AI Agent Firm With Payments Technology Expands Into Texas, New Jersey

Source: Streetwise Reports (2/17/26)

The FUTR Corp. (FTRC:TSX; FTRCF:OTC) announces it has signed agreements with four new dealerships, expanding the reach of its FUTR Payments product into Houston, Texas, and further strengthening its presence in New Jersey. Find out why one analyst says the company is uniquely positioned to take advantage of this “pivotal moment” in the history of AI.

The FUTR Corp. (FTRC:TSX; FTRCF:OTC) announced that it has signed agreements with four new auto dealerships, expanding the reach of its FUTR Payments product into Houston, Texas, and further strengthening its presence in New Jersey, according to a February 17 release from the company.

FUTR is the creator of the FUTR Agent App, which allows users to store, manage, access, and monetize their personal information and make real-time payments.

AI agents were at the center of what “is shaping up to be one of the most audacious branding plays in the history of the internet,” a new US$70 million mega deal for the domain name AI.com announced during last weekend’s Super Bowl.

The signed agreements mark FUTR Payments’ first dealer relationship in Texas and are the initial results of the company’s newly deployed sales resources aimed at geographic expansion and reinforcing its presence in existing markets. With these agreements, FUTR Payments’ U.S. footprint now includes Texas, New York, New Jersey, Delaware, Florida, Iowa, and Connecticut.

These initial dealership partnerships are expected to serve as reference points as FUTR Payments continues to grow its presence in U.S. regional markets. The company said it plans to provide future updates as more dealerships, dealer groups, and regions join the platform.

“Expanding our footprint in New Jersey and entering the Texas market represent an important inflection point for FUTR Payments as we scale our platform across major U.S. markets,” said FUTR Payments Chief Business Officer Mindy Bruns. “These early dealership partnerships validate the demand we’re seeing for intelligent payment infrastructure that helps consumers build financial security while enabling dealers to engage customers in more durable, data-driven ways. We believe this expansion is an early indicator of the broader national opportunity ahead.”

Texas is one of the largest and most diverse automotive markets in the United States, with a significant concentration of independent and used-vehicle dealerships. Trailer Wheel & Frame Co., the company’s first Houston dealer, introduces a new asset category for FUTR Payments, expanding the applicability of its intelligent payment rails beyond traditional automotive inventory. The newly signed agreement with Speedway Motors LLC in Paterson, N.J., further expands the company’s presence in New Jersey by adding three more storefronts.

FUTR Payments is part of FUTR’s broader strategy, which combines intelligent payment infrastructure with consented consumer data and AI-enabled Agents.

Analyst: A ‘Pivotal Moment’ in AI Marketing

According to an updated research note by Research Capital Corp. Analyst Greg McLeish on February 11, “This year’s Super Bowl marked a pivotal moment in how artificial intelligence is being marketed to consumers.”

AI-related advertising has emerged as a key theme, illustrating how quickly AI has transitioned from an abstract concept to a mainstream consumer offering, Business Insider reported. The focus has shifted from chatbots to utility-driven AI systems that can perform tasks on behalf of users. In this context, Crypto.com’s launch of AI.com garnered significant attention and traffic, highlighting the growing interest in “AI agents that do things,” rather than systems that merely respond to prompts. Additionally, OpenClaw’s viral success in late January provided further validation, showing that autonomous, task-executing agents are gaining traction across both consumer platforms and developer communities. These developments indicate that AI agents are becoming mainstream as everyday utilities, rather than novelty tools.

“Crypto.com’s Super Bowl debut of AI.com reinforced that AI agents are moving decisively beyond experimental chat interfaces into mass-market, action-oriented tools,” McLeish wrote. “By committing roughly US$70 million for the AI.com domain and positioning its product as a ‘private AI agent,’ the company highlighted a shift toward autonomous digital assistants capable of managing schedules, automating workflows, and completing tasks on behalf of users. Post-game traffic reportedly overwhelmed early infrastructure, reinforcing strong initial engagement and signaling that consumer adoption is increasingly driven by execution rather than conversation.”

While recent agent launches validate the rising demand for autonomous AI, many early entrants lack the infrastructure needed for durable, real-world deployment, the analyst said.

“The FUTR Corp. is differentiated by anchoring its AI Agent in a SOC 2–compliant digital vault and embedding it directly into regulated financial workflows,” McLeish wrote. “FUTR’s platform combines compliance-grade data infrastructure, live banking and payment rails, and enterprise integrations that allow an agent not only to recommend actions, but to execute them securely across payments, credit, insurance, and home finance. Unlike consumer-facing agents that rely on generic cloud access, or open-source solutions that place security and operational burdens on the user, FUTR’s agent operates within institutional guardrails and is distributed through enterprise partnerships.”

McLeish continued, “In our view, this positions FUTR as an AI-native financial infrastructure layer, rather than a chatbot alternative, as agents move from novelty to necessity.”

Research Capital Corp. maintained its Speculative Buy rating on the stock with a CA$3 target price, a 991% return based on a sum-of-the-parts valuation taken at the time of writing.

“The result is a high-conviction opportunity at the intersection of consumer data, tokenized incentives, and privacy-first infrastructure,” McLeish said.

Most Expensive Domain Purchase in History

The US$70 million acquisition of AI.com by Crypto.com founder Kris Marszalek marks the most expensive domain purchase in history, paid entirely in cryptocurrency to an undisclosed seller, as reported by the Financial Times and covered by Connie Loizos for TechCrunch on February 8. This transaction sets a new standard in domain sales, surpassing previous record holders such as CarInsurance.com at US$49.7 million (2010), VacationRentals.com at US$35 million (2007), and Voice.com at US$30 million (2019).

In a letter to shareholders following the announcement, Alex McDougall, CEO of The FUTR Corp. (FTRC:TSX; FTRCF:OTC), stated that this acquisition “officially marks the beginning of functional AI Agents going mainstream.”

McDougall expressed the belief that this will become “the largest category the world has ever seen and as foundational as the advent of the internet.” He emphasized that FUTR is “ideally positioned to be at the front of the wave that is here.”

McDougall outlined the company’s progress: “We have set up the infrastructure in Q2, built the technology stack through Q3, signed the first wave of commercial partnerships through Q4, and now in Q1 it’s coming to market and the timing couldn’t be better” for FUTR’s agent. The company’s agent offers significant real-world utility, such as rewarding users for taking a picture of their property tax slip, knowing when those taxes are due, helping reserve cash flow in the budget to pay the tax, reminding users 15 days before the due date, comparing property taxes to other neighborhoods and home values, making the payment, and even reporting the payment to credit bureaus to maximize credit scores.

“That’s deep real-world utility,” McDougall said.

AI Agents Tailored to Your Data

According to FUTR, the AI agent within their app is not only easily accessible but also operates under your guidance, tailored specifically to your data. This AI is designed for individuals and works exclusively for you around the clock to accomplish your tasks. It integrates data from various sources and smoothly handles complex financial queries and services. “Chat GPT can find you information. It can order you food. It can do things in your browser,” McDougall told Streetwise Reports. But “FUTR can take your insurance policy, tell you where it’s good, where it’s bad, and find you a better one from our curated brand partners. If you put your mortgage into it, FUTR can read it, learn about it, tell you what clauses are suspect, find a better payment schedule for you, and then actually connect to payment rails and make those payments for you to take that intelligence and turn it into real action.”

For renters, FUTR could track when to renew your lease and report your rent payments to the credit bureau to help build your credit. “That’s really a key differentiator,” McDougall said. “There are a lot of AI agents that can tell you things. FUTR can go and do things for you.”

In a unique feature, FUTR tokens, created by the FUTR Foundation on the BASE Blockchain that powers the FUTR ecosystem, reward consumers and enterprises with tokens for sharing data, which they can use to purchase goods and services from FUTR brand partners. “Brands can purchase FUTR tokens or earn them from consumers and use those tokens to pay for leads from FUTR,” the company stated on its website.

According to the company, upcoming catalysts that could impact the stock price include the broad launch of the FUTR AI Agent App and FUTR Token sometime this quarter. The company also plans to introduce a FUTR Visa card.

The Catalyst: ‘Your Person For Everything’

According to the company, FUTR’s agent “can be your person for everything,” as McDougall explained. Unlike Chat GPT, which is designed for billions and processes data in a generalized way, the FUTR AI creates a personalized AI stack for each user, which the company refers to as “high fidelity AI.” A key advantage is that instead of your data being monetized without your knowledge, “every piece of data that goes into this agent and into this engine, you’re getting paid for it,” he said.

AI-powered shopping, with agents like FUTR’s acting on our behalf, signifies a major shift in the marketplace, according to a report by McKinsey & Co. This development points to a future where AI anticipates consumer needs, explores shopping options, negotiates deals, and completes transactions, all aligned with human intentions but operating independently through multistep processes enabled by reasoning models.

“This isn’t just an evolution of e-commerce,” the report stated. “It’s a rethinking of shopping itself in which the boundaries between platforms, services, and experiences give way to an integrated intent-driven flow, through highly personalized consumer journeys that deliver a fast, frictionless outcome.”

Streetwise Ownership Overview*

Insiders and Management: 23%
Share Structure as of 2/3/2026

By 2030, the U.S. B2C retail market alone could see up to US$1 trillion in orchestrated revenue from agentic commerce, with global estimates ranging from US$3 trillion to US$5 trillion, according to McKinsey research. This trend is expected to have an impact comparable to previous web and mobile-commerce revolutions, but it could progress even more rapidly since agents can navigate the same digital paths to purchase as humans, effectively “riding on the rails” established by these earlier transformations, researchers noted.

“This presents both benefits and risks for today’s commerce ecosystem,” McKinsey explained. “All kinds of businesses — brands, retailers, marketplaces, logistics and commerce services providers, and payments players — will need to adapt to the new paradigm and successfully navigate the challenges of trust, risk, and innovation.”

Ownership and Share Structure1

Approximately 23% of the company is owned by management and insiders. The remainder is held by retail investors.

Top shareholders include G. Scott Paterson with 8.38%, Melrose Ventures LLC with 2.08%, Michael Hillmer with 0.74%, Ashish Kapoor with 0.55%, and Jason G. Ewart with 0.52%.

The company’s market cap on February 12 was CA$35.1 million with 125.36 million shares outstanding. It trades within a 52-week range of CA$0.09 and CA$0.42.


Important Disclosures:

  1. The FUTR Corp. is a billboard sponsor of Streetwise Reports and pays SWR a monthly sponsorship fee between US$3,000 and US$6,000.
  2. As of the date of this article, officers, contractors, shareholders, and/or employees of Streetwise Reports LLC (including members of their household) own securities of The FUTR Corp.
  3. Steve Sobek wrote this article for Streetwise Reports LLC and provides services to Streetwise Reports as an employee.
  4. This article does not constitute investment advice and is not a solicitation for any investment. Streetwise Reports does not render general or specific investment advice and the information on Streetwise Reports should not be considered a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Each reader is encouraged to consult with his or her personal financial adviser and perform their own comprehensive investment research. By opening this page, each reader accepts and agrees to Streetwise Reports’ terms of use and full legal disclaimer. Streetwise Reports does not endorse or recommend the business, products, services or securities of any company.

For additional disclosures, please click here.

1. Ownership and Share Structure Information

The information listed above was updated on the date this article was published and was compiled from information from the company and various other data providers.

RBNZ holds rates as expected and confirms dovish stance. Inflation declines in Canada

By JustMarkets 

On Tuesday, trading on the US stock market concluded with moderate gains. By the end of the day, the Dow Jones Index (US30) rose by 0.07%. The S&P 500 (US500) climbed by 0.10%. The tech-heavy Nasdaq (US100) closed higher by 0.14%. The financial sector outperformed the broader market: shares of JPMorgan Chase and Citigroup strengthened following statements from FOMC representatives regarding the likely maintenance of tight policy, which supports expectations for net interest margins. Investors are now awaiting the publication of the regulator’s minutes and core PCE inflation data to assess the sustainability of the disinflationary trend.

The Canadian dollar (CAD) weakened to 1.367 per US dollar, retreating from a 16-month high reached in late January amid slowing inflation and deteriorating foreign trade conditions. Consumer price growth slowed to 2.3% in January, while the Bank of Canada’s (BoC) core indicator dropped to 2.4%. This reinforced expectations of a pause in policy tightening at a rate of 2.25% and narrowed the yield differential that had previously supported the currency. Additional pressure is coming from the commodities factor: oil quotes are being held back amid discussions within OPEC+ regarding a potential production increase starting in April.

European markets ended the day with gains. Germany’s DAX (DE40) rose by 0.80%, France’s CAC 40 (FR40) closed up 0.54%, Spain’s IBEX 35 (ES35) gained 0.60%, and the UK’s FTSE 100 (UK100) closed up 0.79%. The German DAX 40 closed Tuesday at 24,998 points, a one-week high, reflecting improved sentiment across European trading floors.

WTI oil prices held above $62 per barrel, breaking the recent decline as markets assessed the outcome of negotiations between the US and Iran regarding the nuclear program. Tehran reported reaching a general understanding on key points of a potential deal, while the American side announced the continuation of dialogue in Geneva. However, uncertainty remains: Iran temporarily restricted shipping in the Strait of Hormuz due to military exercises, and the US dispatched a second aircraft carrier to the region.

Platinum (XPT) prices dropped to approximately $2,000 per ounce, hitting a two-month low amid a general decline in the precious metals segment and reduced trading activity due to holidays in Asia and the US. Despite the slowdown in US inflation, which bolstered expectations of Fed rate cuts later this year, investors remain cautious ahead of the release of new data and the regulator’s minutes.

Natural gas (XNG) prices in the US fell by 5% to approximately $3.07 per MMBtu, hitting a low since October. Pressure on quotes was intensified by near-record production volumes and prognoses of warmer weather through early March, which weakens heating demand and allows for the accumulation of large inventories in storage. Average production in the Lower 48 states rose to 108.5 billion cubic feet per day (bcf/d) in February, up from 106.3 billion in January, with daily figures recently hitting 111 billion bcf/d, approaching historic highs. Additional market support comes from rising exports to LNG terminals, which increased to 18.6 bcf/d in February and could surpass the December record.

Asian markets traded without a uniform trend yesterday. Japan’s Nikkei 225 (JP225) declined by 0.42%, China’s FTSE China A50 (CHA50) will not trade for the entire week due to Lunar New Year celebrations, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng (HK50) also did not trade yesterday, and Australia’s ASX 200 (AU200) showed a positive result of 0.24%.

The New Zealand dollar (NZD) declined to $0.601 following the Reserve Bank of New Zealand’s (RBNZ) decision to maintain the key rate and confirm a dovish policy stance. The regulator signaled that supportive conditions will remain in the near term, and further steps will be gradual as the economy strengthens and inflation returns to the target level. Meanwhile, updated expectations allow for a possible 25 bp rate hike as early as the end of the year – significantly earlier than previous guidance for 2027.

S&P 500 (US500) 6,843.24 +7.07 (+0.10%)

Dow Jones (US30) 49,533.19 +32.26 (+0.07)

DAX (DE40) 24,998.40 +197.49 (+0.80%)

FTSE 100 (UK100) 10,556.17 +82.48 (+0.79%)

USD Index 97.16 +0.24% (+0.25%)

News feed for: 2026.02.18

  • Japan Trade Balance (m/m) at 01:50 (GMT+2); – JPY (LOW)
  • Australia Wage Price Index (m/m) at 02:30 (GMT+2); – AUD (MED)
  • New Zealand RNBZ Interest Rate Decision at 03:00 (GMT+2); – NZD (HIGH)
  • New Zealand RNBZ Monetary Policy Statement at 03:00 (GMT+2); – NZD (HIGH)
  • New Zealand RNBZ Press Conference at 04:00 (GMT+2); – NZD (MED)
  • UK Inflation Rate (m/m) at 09:00 (GMT+2); – GBP (HIGH)
  • US Durable Goods Orders (m/m) at 15:30 (GMT+2); – USD (MED)
  • US Building Permits (m/m) at 15:30 (GMT+2); – USD (LOW)
  • US Industrial Production (m/m) at 16:15 (GMT+2); – USD (LOW)
  • US FOMC Meeting Minutes at 21:00 (GMT+2). – USD (HIGH)

By JustMarkets

 

This article reflects a personal opinion and should not be interpreted as an investment advice, and/or offer, and/or a persistent request for carrying out financial transactions, and/or a guarantee, and/or a forecast of future events.

Gold and Silver Move in Different Directions

Source: Adrian Day (2/17/26)

Global Analyst Adrian Day looks at the action of gold and silver the week of February 7, 2026, and shares his view on how to invest. He also looks at developments from several companies on his list.

The action in gold and silver over the past week since the large drops is mixed. Since the Monday low for gold just above $4,000 (1:38 a.m. Eastern), the action has been encouraging, with gold gaining over $900, if not steadily. Silver, however, fell further.

It staged an impressive rally at the beginning of the week moving over $90, before dropping again, hitting its low of just over $64 an ounce on Friday morning in Asia, before recovering to close a tad below $78. That is 36% down from the high a week-ago Thursday, while gold is down just 11% from its peak.

We expect these trends to continue, with gold moving two steps forward, one back for the next few weeks before hitting new highs within a couple of months. I expect we have see the lows. Silver, however, I expect to be more volatile, and may retest its lows, but I expect it to be longer before we see new highs.

Should You Invest Now in the Precious Metals Equities?

We are buying the gold stocks, perhaps with a narrower focus, and opportunistically. Given the volatility, we are looking to buy the bests companies on the down days. Thursday was a good day to buy, but we were scarcely buying anything Friday. As for silver, the declines in the equities have been fairly muted given the large decline in the metal.

In fairness, though, many of the silver names had not moved higher in line with the silver price in December and January. However, a longer recovery with perhaps new lows for silver might see the stocks decline further. Thus, we have few “top buys” among the gold stocks below, but if you are an active trader, you should be alert to any pullbacks during the week.

Barrick Plans Reorganization With New CEO

Barrick Mining Corp. (ABX:TSX; B:NYSE) released year-end results and forward guidance, overshadowed by a flood of important announcements on the company’s strategy and future. Disturbingly, many details were omitted, even when questioned by analysts.

  • The company plans to proceed with an IPO of its North American assets, including the Nevada Gold Mines (NGM), saying it intended to IPO a minority of around 10-15% of its interest with a target completion in the fourth quarter of this year. However, details were light, and during its analyst call, it would not respond to several questions on the specifics.
  • It completed an operational review, with safety top priority. Business units have been restructured, with Pueblo Viejo going into the North American region, now overseen by Tim Crib, moved from Reko Diq; he is the group COO. The review appears to have been focused on Nevada which had had some operational issues in recent years, and difficulty attracting and retaining people. A Chief Technical Officer has been named at the group level.
  • Barrick said its board is concerned about security in Balochistan, the province hosting the Reko Diq copper project. A review of the project is underway, though the company says “all options are being considered.”
  • It named Mark Hill as permanent CEO after “an extensive search”. He stepped in as interim CEO when Mark Bristow abruptly left the company in September. Hill joined Barrick in 2019 after the merge with Randgold and was not seen as a Bristow loyalist.
  • Barrick also introduced a new dividend policy, increasing its base dividend, and changing its bonus dividend program to a target of 50% of free cash flow. This equates to an estimated yield of 3.7%, one of the largest in the industry. This replaces the policy based on free cash on the balance sheet that had been in place only a couple of years, and adds more discretion to the dividend.
  • The new dividend policy will replace buybacks going forward; the share buyback authorization has not been renewed for 2026. Last year, Barrick repurchased $1.5 billion of shares, representing about 3% of the shares outstanding. It was only a few years ago that Barrick started a buyback program, after stubbornly rejecting it for years under Bristow.

Pakistan Project’s Future Appears Uncertain

Barrick seems to be moving towards a smaller North American-focused company, with growing indications it will (or at least wants to) scale back its investments in Pakistan. One sign was its statement that it had paused proceeding with a loan for the project until its review had been concluded.

“It is too early to say” if a divestiture is on the table. As discussed before, the Saudi Arabian sovereign wealth fund wants into the project and was earlier rebuffed by Barrick who told the Saudis they should buy some of the Pakistan government’s stake. So there might be a ready buyer for part of Barrick’s interest.

North American IPO Only a Minority Interest, With Details Unclear

The North American assets proposed for the new company IPO represent just under 60% of Barrick’s NAV. The small spin off ensues that Barrick retains a controlling interest in NGMs and the other joint-venture mines. Separating the higher-quality North American assets will help to release some value but, if it spins off less than 15% of its interest–so less than 10% of the total mines–I question whether the new company would trade at the premium multiple the company is expecting. Conglomerate discounts are common, due to the complexity of organizations, and a partial spin off of assets partially owned, add to complexity.

Several question remain hanging over the transaction, most notably the ROFR held by Newmont Corp. (NEM:NYSE; NGT:TSX; NEM:ASX). Barrick, in answers to questions, said “we are well aware of our legal contracts,” which does not really answer the question. The last thing the company needs is a legal dispute with Newmont over rights.

Given that Newmont apparently has a ROFR on NGM, is a partner in the Pueblo Viejo mine, and has rights to invest in Fourmile, Newmont must be looking seriously at whether to make a bid for these assets. On the analyst call, Barrick would not say whether it had held talks with Newmont over its rights. In addition, Barrick has yet to address the use of proceeds; and the domicile of the new company, important for index inclusion.

A Large Dividend Boost, Despite Capital Needs

The new dividend policy represents an annual distribution of $2.8 billion or more. Given the company’s large capital requirements, one might question the wisdom of such a large dividend.

This might also be another signal on intentions regarding Reko Dik. Although one metric may be better than another, the large gold companies (Barrick and Newmont) have a history of introducing dividend policies only to abandon or change them, which defeats the point of having a policy in the first place. Barrick’s previous policy had only been in place a couple of years.

Results Were Strong, Though Guidance Soft

The announcements on the IPO, Pakistan, the new CEO, and the dividend, overshadowed the fourth-quarter results which were in line with expectations, though guidance was distinctly weak. The fourth-quarter saw strong financial results, with the highest production of the year (as indicated by Bristow last January that it would), and unsurprisingly, given the gold and copper prices, record cash flow and adjusted earnings per share.

Gold production was up 5% over the third-quarter, driven by large increases at the Nevada mines, while copper output was 13% higher than Q3, primarily driven by Lumwana in Zambia. However, costs in the fourth quarter were higher than anticipated. Annual shareholder returns in 2025, from share buybacks and the dividend, were the highest ever.

On specific mines, Barrick said it had restarted all three underground mines at Loulo-Gounkoto in Mali and said the relationship with the government is being reset. It paid the government over quarter-of-a-billion dollars to settle the dispute as well as committing to pay the government all retained earnings. In addition, it appears to have conceded the government’s demand to increase its ownership to 20%. Barrick said the mine complex was expected to produce this year only half its 2024 output as it ramps back up.

It also said that recoveries at the Pueblo Viejo mine in Dominican Republic remain a challenge, and it set a new lower target recovery rate. Currently recoveries are around 75% and the new target is 84%. Hill said that, despite lower recovery rates, the mine life would be extended to 2048 maintaining the same total output produced.

Guidance Calls for Lower Production and Higher Costs

Guidance for 2026 was soft, with no guidance beyond. The company said it expected the seventh consecutive year of lower gold production, 10% higher costs (14% above consensus estimates), and significantly higher capex than expected (again, questioning the dividend increase). The production drop comes despite the restart of Loulo-Gounkoto. Once again, the second-half is expected to be stronger with about 55% of the annual production. It would appear, however, that the company has deliberately set cautious guidance, which it aims to achieve, rather than the admittedly optimistic guidance provided by Bristow, which often seemed more like goals.

Longer term, the company indicated that the cost outlook beyond 2026 should remain flat, rather than the cost reductions earlier indicated. This was in response to a question. Interesting, and rather disturbingly, many of the more significant details (long-term cost outlook, size of NGM IPO and more) were only revealed in answers to questions rather than stated upfront by the company.

Barrick’s proven and probable reserves totaled 85 million ounces at year-end, calculated at $1,500, with 150 million ounces of measured and indicated resources, calculated at $2,000. These numbers are lower than 2024 due to the sale of two mines. Copper resources, calculated at $3.25/lb, remained stabled at 18 million ounces. For reference, spot prices at $4,964 and $5.88, so the assumed prices seem very low.

We are holding, awaiting progress on the North American IPO.

Transition at Wheaton as CEO Moves Up

Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM:TSX; WPM:NYSE) said founder and CEO Randy Smallwood would step down and become non-executive Chairman of the Board, to be replaced at CEO by current President, Haytham Hodaly. Helping to found the company in 2004, Smallwood has led the company for 15 years.

A mining engineer by training and former analyst at RBC, Hodaly joined Wheaton in 2012 and has recently been in charge of executing streaming transactions.

Hold.

Tether Strengthens Its Grip on Metalla

Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA:TSX.V; MTA:NYSE American) saw Tether report additional share purchases, taking its stake to 8.9%. It last reported a month ago, with 7.8%. It appears to be buying in the market, consistently, rather than actively taking advantage of price dips. It is now the second largest holder, behind Beedie Investments (10.3%) which had provided debt facilities to the company before converting entirely to equity, and ahead of Euro Pacific at 6.2%.

(Disclosure: I manage Euro Pacific gold fund and gold accounts.)

Metalla is a buy independent of Tether’s growing interest.

Ares Maintains Dividend and Credit Standing

Ares Capital Corp. (ARCC:NASDAQ) reports a solid quarter, with 50 cents per share of core earnings, once again in excess of the dividend, which remains stable at 48 cents per quarter. Credit, both non-accruals and the investment grade, remained stable, while the Net Asset Value increased slightly over the year-ago quarter (though modestly down quarter-on-quarter). It is the highest rated BDC by all three ratings agencies.

New activity remains strong, with the majority for loans during the year to existing portfolio companies, for growth, while the second half saw a pick up of new borrowers, adding over 100 new companies. Exits averaged an IRR of 25%. The company remains in a great position to invest in undervalued areas with high cash balance and low leverage.

In keeping the dividend flat, the company said it was in a good position to maintain the dividend, despite lower rates in the economy. It has low leverage (1.08x), its portfolio companies have strong debt coverage, while its carry forward income equivalent to $1.38 per share, represents nearly three quarters of dividends, providing a cushion for any temporary income shortfalls. It estimates that the decline in rates, and therefore a decline in earnings, will represent about 1 cent per share in the current quarter.

How Exposed to Software Weakness in Ares?

On the analyst call, there was much discussion on the risks posed by the software industry. It was positive to see the company tackle the subject head on, and not wait for questions to respond. CEO Kort Schnabel said the company recognized the risks of new technology and obsolescence. But he added that Ares’s portfolio will remain “highly resistant”, since it invests in foundational technology, as well as software for regulated industries, which are much slower to change software.

Trading just below NAV with a yield of 9.95%, Ares is a buy for long-term income investors. Disruption in the sector, however, including possible dividend cuts or credit troubles, even at other companies, will raise concerns about even the strongest companies in the sector, so we may see increased volatility going forward.

Hutchison’s Revenue and Profits Increase as It Struggles With Global Trade

Hutchison Port Holdings Trust (HPHT:Singapore)  reported revenue up 2.6% for the year, with profit up over 15%. Despite this, the final distribution was cut again, to 6½ cents (HKD) down from 8 cents two years ago, representing a forward dividend of 6.7%. Revenue rose thanks to higher throughput at the Yantian terminals in Shenzhen. The company noted that though exports from Yantian remained strong, more ships were returning empty. Throughput at the Hong Kong terminals, which were the historic base of the company, fell again, by over 6%. The high profits increase was largely due to the revaluation of the company’s yuan-denominated financial assets, offset partly by higher capex.

The company said the outlook was uncertain, facing “a complex landscape marred by the constant shifting in trade and tariff policies.” The new “China plus one” strategy of diversifying dependence on China for materials, is unlikely to change back to sole reliance on China, even if the trade dispute smooths over, in my view. So this is a fundamental shift for Hutchison. At the same time, growth across Europe is expected to be subdued amid geopolitical tensions.

Hold, particularly as part of a diversified income portfolio.

TOP BUYS this week, in addition to above, include Kingsmen Creatives Ltd. (KMEN:SI), Lara Exploration Ltd. (LRA:TSX.V), and Orogen Royalties Inc. (OGN:TSXV; OGNNF:OTC).


Important Disclosures:

  1. As of the date of this article, officers and/or employees of Streetwise Reports LLC (including members of their household) own securities of Barrick Mining Corp., Wheaton Precious Metals Corp., Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd., Lara Exploration Ltd., and Orogen Royalties Inc.
  2. Adrian Day: I, or members of my immediate household or family, own securities of: All. My company has a financial relationship with: None. My company has purchased stocks mentioned in this article for my management clients: All. I determined which companies would be included in this article based on my research and understanding of the sector.
  3. Statements and opinions expressed are the opinions of the author and not of Streetwise Reports, Street Smart, or their officers. The author is wholly responsible for the accuracy of the statements. Streetwise Reports was not paid by the author to publish or syndicate this article. Streetwise Reports requires contributing authors to disclose any shareholdings in, or economic relationships with, companies that they write about. Any disclosures from the author can be found  below. Streetwise Reports relies upon the authors to accurately provide this information and Streetwise Reports has no means of verifying its accuracy.
  4.  This article does not constitute investment advice and is not a solicitation for any investment. Streetwise Reports does not render general or specific investment advice and the information on Streetwise Reports should not be considered a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Each reader is encouraged to consult with his or her personal financial adviser and perform their own comprehensive investment research. By opening this page, each reader accepts and agrees to Streetwise Reports’ terms of use and full legal disclaimer. Streetwise Reports does not endorse or recommend the business, products, services or securities of any company.

For additional disclosures, please click here.

Adrian Day Disclosures

Adrian Day’s Global Analyst is distributed for $990 per year by Investment Consultants International, Ltd., P.O. Box 6644, Annapolis, MD 21401. (410) 224-8885. www.AdrianDayGlobalAnalyst.com. Publisher: Adrian Day. Owner: Investment Consultants International, Ltd. Staff may have positions in securities discussed herein. Adrian Day is also President of Global Strategic Management (GSM), a registered investment advisor, and a separate company from this service. In his capacity as GSM president, Adrian Day may be buying or selling for clients securities recommended herein concurrently, before or after recommendations herein, and may be acting for clients in a manner contrary to recommendations herein. This is not a solicitation for GSM. Views herein are the editor’s opinion and not fact. All information is believed to be correct, but its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The owner and editor are not responsible for errors and omissions. © 2023. Adrian Day’s Global Analyst. Information and advice herein are intended purely for the subscriber’s own account. Under no circumstances may any part of a Global Analyst e-mail be copied or distributed without prior written permission of the editor. Given the nature of this service, we will pursue any violations aggressively.

USD/JPY Moderately Higher: Market Balances Between Data and Forecasts

By RoboForex Analytical Department

USD/JPY rose to 153.50 on Wednesday. The yen gave up some of the gains from the previous session, despite strong foreign trade statistics.

Japan’s exports rose at their fastest pace in more than three years in January, driven by robust demand for AI-related chips. This data increased expectations of continued policy normalisation by the Bank of Japan.

At the same time, weak fourth-quarter GDP, which came in below forecasts and narrowly avoided a technical recession, is restraining optimism.

Investors believe Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s economic policy could support growth and indirectly strengthen the case for a gradual rate hike. The market is now pricing in the possibility of a tightening policy in April.

The IMF has previously stated that it does not set a specific target level for the yen, believing instead that the exchange rate is determined by market factors.

Technical Analysis

On the H4 chart, USD/JPY has entered a consolidation phase following a sharp drop from 157.50–158.00. The price is currently held in the range of 152.25–153.80. The Bollinger Bands have narrowed markedly, indicating that volatility is declining and the market is forming a base. The 153.80–153.95 area represents the nearest resistance. Support stands at 152.25. As long as the price remains below 153.80, the structure remains neutral to bearish.

On the shorter H1 time frame, there is a short-term local rebound from 152.80–153.00 with an attempt to exit towards the upper limit of the range. The price is approaching 153.90, where strong intraday resistance is forming. A break above 153.95 would open the way towards 154.60. Failure to break resistance could bring the pair back to 153.00 and then on to 152.25.

Overall, the market is compressing ahead of a potential move. A breakout of the range will set the direction for the next motion.

Conclusion

In summary, USD/JPY remains caught between conflicting fundamental factors: robust export data support BoJ normalisation expectations, but weak GDP and political uncertainty limit yen strength. Technically, the pair is coiling within a tightening range, signalling an imminent directional breakout. The neutral-bearish bias persists as long as the price holds below 153.80–153.95 resistance. A clear break above this level would target 154.60, while failure could trigger a retest of 152.25 support. With the BoJ’s April policy meeting in focus, the next significant move awaits a fresh catalyst.

 

Disclaimer

Any forecasts contained herein are based on the author’s particular opinion. This analysis may not be treated as trading advice. RoboForex bears no responsibility for trading results based on trading recommendations and reviews contained herein.

EURUSD Slides Smoothly: Fed Minutes in Focus

By RoboForex Analytical Department

EURUSD is moving smoothly downward and has touched 1.1840. Investors are preparing for the release of key US statistics that could affect expectations for the Fed’s future policy.

The focus is on the minutes of the last Fed meeting, a preliminary estimate of GDP, and the PCE core inflation index. The latter is a key policy gauge for the regulator.

The dollar came under pressure last week following softer inflation data, which increased expectations of rate easing in the second half of the year. However, a strong labour market report – showing the highest employment growth in more than a year and an unexpected decline in unemployment – pointed to the resilience of the economy.

The market is now pricing in the first rate cut in June. Overall, around 62 basis points of easing are expected for 2026, corresponding to two 25 bp reductions and roughly a 50% probability of a third step.

Technical Analysis

On the H4 time frame, EURUSD is consolidating after pulling back from January highs. The range has expanded, but the price is gradually moving towards its lower limit. The key level stands at 1.1835, an intermediate support within the wider range of 1.1765–1.2000. If it holds, sideways movement with attempts to correct upward is likely to persist. A break below 1.1835 would open the way to 1.1765. A return above 1.1890–1.1900 would ease bearish pressure and return the pair to the middle of the range.

Short-term downward pressure remains on the H1 chart for EURUSD. The price consistently forms lower highs and lows, trading near the bottom of the Bollinger Bands. The middle line acts as dynamic resistance.

The Stochastic oscillator is in the oversold zone, which allows for local rebounds, but the MACD remains in negative territory – momentum is still on the side of sellers. The nearest support is at 1.1835. Securing below it would intensify the decline towards 1.1810–1.1800. Resistance stands at 1.1860–1.1870.

Conclusion

In summary, EURUSD remains under steady selling pressure as markets await pivotal US data that will shape Fed expectations. The pair is testing critical support at 1.1835, with technical indicators confirming bearish momentum despite oversold conditions. The fundamental picture is mixed: softer inflation points to eventual Fed easing, but robust employment data complicates the timeline. The near-term direction hinges entirely on today’s releases. A break below 1.1835 would likely accelerate losses towards 1.1765, while a rebound above 1.1890–1.1900 could signal a temporary respite. Until then, the path of least resistance remains lower.

 

Disclaimer

Any forecasts contained herein are based on the author’s particular opinion. This analysis may not be treated as trading advice. RoboForex bears no responsibility for trading results based on trading recommendations and reviews contained herein.

RBA minutes provide no clear guidance. Markets watch second round of US-Iran talks

By JustMarkets 

There was no trading on the US stock market on Monday.

European markets ended Monday mixed, maintaining the subdued momentum of the previous week as investors assessed the impact of a strong euro and expectations that benchmark rates will remain unchanged. Germany’s DAX (DE40) declined by 0.46%, France’s CAC 40 (FR40) closed up 0.06%, Spain’s IBEX 35 (ES35) gained 0.99%, and the UK’s FTSE 100 (UK100) closed up 0.26%. Trading activity was low due to holidays in North America and China.

The Swiss franc (CHF) traded around 0.77 per US dollar, remaining near historic highs amid expectations that the Swiss National Bank (SNB) will maintain a loose monetary policy in the near term. Safe-haven demand continues to provide additional support to the currency, though its influence has diminished slightly of late. Preliminary Q4 GDP data showed economic growth of 0.2% following a 0.5% contraction in Q3. This points to the relative resilience of the Swiss economy even under external pressure, including the 39% tariffs imposed by the Donald Trump administration.

On Tuesday, silver (XAG) fell by more than 2% to drop below $76 per ounce, continuing a three-week correction amid low liquidity due to holiday closures in China, Hong Kong, and several other Asian countries. The speculative surge in January, largely driven by Chinese traders, has been replaced by a sharp reversal, prompting regulators to take measures to mitigate market risks. After reaching record levels above $120 in late January, prices fell toward $64 early this month due to the closing of leveraged positions and forced asset liquidations.

West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil prices fluctuated near $63 per barrel on Monday following two consecutive weeks of declines. Markets are monitoring the second round of negotiations between the US and Iran amid an increased US military presence in the region and tough rhetoric from Donald Trump. Iran, for its part, has signaled a readiness to make concessions on its nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief. Despite the geopolitics, pressure on prices persists due to oversupply. OPEC+ nations are discussing a potential production increase in April, while the International Energy Agency confirmed its projections of a significant oil surplus in 2026 and lowered its estimate for global demand growth.

Asian markets traded without a uniform trend last week. Japan’s Nikkei 225 (JP225) fell by 0.24%, China’s FTSE China A50 (CHA50) will not trade for the entire week due to Lunar New Year celebrations, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng (HK50) rose by 0.52%, and Australia’s ASX 200 (AU200) showed a positive result of 0.22%.

On Tuesday, the Australian dollar (AUD) fell toward $0.70 after the publication of the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) meeting minutes, which provided no clear guidance on the future interest rate trajectory. The regulator emphasized that future decisions will depend on incoming data and the balance of risks, noting that without further tightening, inflation could remain above the 2-3% target range for longer. Markets are now awaiting Q4 wage data and the January labor market report to assess the outlook for inflation and RBA policy.

S&P 500 (US500) 6,836.17 0 (0%)

Dow Jones (US30) 49,500.93 0 (0%)

DAX (DE40) 24,800.91 −113.97 (−0.46%)

FTSE 100 (UK100) 10,473.69 +27.34 (+0.26%)

USD Index 97.07 +0.16% (+0.16%)

News feed for: 2026.02.17

  • Australia RBA Meeting Minutes at 02:30 (GMT+2); – AUD (MED)
  • German Inflation Rate (m/m) at 09:00 (GMT+2); – EUR (MED)
  • UK Claimant Count Change (m/m) at 09:00 (GMT+2); – GBP (HIGH)
  • UK Average Earnings Index (m/m) at 09:00 (GMT+2); – GBP (HIGH)
  • UK Unemployment Rate (m/m) at 09:00 (GMT+2); – GBP (HIGH)
  • Eurozone ZEW Economic Sentiment (m/m) at 12:00 (GMT+2); – EUR (MED)
  • Canada Consumer Price Index (m/m) at 15:30 (GMT+2); – CAD (HIGH)
  • New Zealand Producer Price Index (q/q) at 23:45 (GMT+2). – NZD (MED)

By JustMarkets

 

This article reflects a personal opinion and should not be interpreted as an investment advice, and/or offer, and/or a persistent request for carrying out financial transactions, and/or a guarantee, and/or a forecast of future events.

Why is US health care still the most expensive in the world after decades of cost-cutting initiatives?

By Patrick Aguilar, Washington University in St. Louis 

In announcing its “Great Healthcare Plan” in January 2026, the Trump administration became the latest in a long history of efforts by the U.S. government to rein in the soaring cost of health care.

As a physician and professor studying the intersection of business and health, I know that the challenges in reforming the sprawling U.S. health care system are immense. That’s partly for political and even philosophical reasons.

But it also reflects a complex system fraught with competing interests – and the fact that patients, hospitals, health insurance companies and drug manufacturers change their behaviors in conflicting ways when faced with new rules.

Soaring costs

U.S. health care is the most expensive in the world, and according to a poll published in late January 2026, two-thirds of Americans are very worried about their ability to pay for it – whether it’s their medications, a doctor’s visit, health insurance or an unpredictably costly medical emergency.

Disputes over health policy even played a central role in the federal government shutdown in fall 2025.

Trump’s health care framework outlines no specific policy actions, but it does establish priorities to address a number of longtime concerns, including prescription drug costs, price transparency, lowering insurance premiums and making health insurance companies generally more accountable.

Why have these challenges been so difficult to address?

Drug price sticker shock

Prescription drug costs in the U.S. began rising sharply in the 1980s, when drugmakers increased the development of innovative new treatments for common diseases. But efforts to combat this trend have resembled a game of whack-a-mole because the factors driving it are so intertwined.

One issue is the unique set of challenges that define drug development. As with any consumer good, manufacturers price prescription drugs to cover costs and earn profits. Drug manufacturing, however, involves an expensive and time-consuming development process with a high risk of failure.

Patent protection is another issue. Drug patents last 20 years, but completing costly trials necessary for regulatory approval takes up much of that period, reducing the time when manufacturers have exclusive rights to sell the drug. After a patent expires, generic versions can be made and sold for significantly less, lowering the profits for the original manufacturer. Though some data challenges this claim, the pharmaceutical industry contends that high prices while drugs are under patent help companies recover their investment, which then funds the discovery of new drugs. And they often find ways to extend their patents, which keeps prices elevated for longer.

Then there are the intermediaries. Once a drug is on the market, prices are typically set through negotiations with administrators called pharmacy benefit managers, who negotiate discounts and rebates on prescription drugs for health insurers and employers offering benefits to their workers. Pharmacy benefit managers are paid based on those discounts, so they do not have an incentive to lower total drug prices, though new transparency rules enacted Feb. 3 aim to change payment practices. Drugmakers often raise the list price of drugs to make up for the markdowns that pharmacy benefit managers negotiate – and possibly even more than that.

In many countries, centralized government negotiators set the price for prescription drugs, resulting in lower drug prices. This has prompted American officials to consider using those prices as a reference for setting drug prices here. In its blueprint, the Trump administration has called for a “most-favored nation” drug pricing policy, under which some U.S. drug prices would match the lowest prices paid in other countries.

This may work in the short term, but manufacturers say it could also curtail investment in innovative new drugs. And some industry experts worry that it may push manufacturers to raise international prices.

Policy experts have questioned whether TrumpRx will bring down drug prices.

In late 2025, 16 pharmaceutical companies agreed to most-favored nation pricing for some drugs. Consumers can now buy them directly from manufacturers through TrumpRx, a portal that points consumers to drug manufacturers and provides coupons for purchasing more than 40 widely used brand-name drugs at a discount, which launched Feb. 5. However, many drugs available through the platform can be purchased at lower prices as generics

Increasing price transparency

Fewer than 1 in 20 Americans know how much health care services will cost before they receive them. One fix for this seems obvious: Make providers list their prices up front. That way, consumers could compare prices and choose the most cost-effective options for their care.

Spurred by bipartisan support in Congress, the government has embraced price transparency for health care services over the past decade. In February 2025, the Trump administration announced stricter enforcement for hospitals, which must now post actual prices, rather than estimates, for common medical procedures. Data is mixed on whether the approach is working as planned, however. Hospitals have reduced prices for people paying out of pocket, but not for those paying with insurance, according to a 2025 study.

For one thing, when regulations change, companies make strategic decisions to achieve their financial goals and meet the new rules – sometimes yielding unintended consequences. One study found, for example, that price transparency regulations in a series of clinics led to an increase in physician charges to insurance companies because some providers who had been charging less raised their prices to match more expensive competitors.

Additionally, a 2024 federal government study found that 46% of hospitals were not compliant. The American Hospital Association, a trade group, suggested price transparency imposes a high administrative burden on hospitals while providing confusing information to patients, whose costs may vary depending on unique aspects of their conditions. And the fine for noncompliance, US$300 per day, may be insufficient to offset the cost of disclosing this information, according to some health policy experts.

Beyond high costs, patients also worry that insurers won’t actually cover the care they receive. Cigna is currently fighting a lawsuit accusing its doctors of denying claims almost instantly – within an average of 1.2 seconds – but concerns about claims denial are rampant across the industry. Companies’ use of artificial intelligence to deny claims is compounding the problem.

Curbing the rise in health insurance premiums

Many Americans struggle to afford monthly insurance premiums. But curbing that increase significantly may be impossible without reining in overall health care costs and, paradoxically, keeping more people insured.

Insurance works by pooling money paid by members of an insurance plan. That money covers all members’ health care costs, with some using more than they contribute and others less. Premium prices therefore depend on how many people are in the plan, as well as the services insurance will cover and the services people actually use. Because health care costs are rising overall, commercial insurance companies may not be able to significantly lower premiums without reducing their ability to cover costs and absorb risk.

Nearly two-thirds of Americans under age 65 receive health insurance through employers. Another 6.9% of them get it through Affordable Care Act marketplaces, where enrollment numbers are extremely sensitive to premium costs.

Enrollment in ACA plans nearly doubled in 2021, from about 12 million to more than 24 million, when the government introduced subsidies to reduce premiums during the COVID-19 pandemic. But when the subsidies expired on Jan. 1, 2026, about 1.4 million dropped coverage, and for most who didn’t, premiums more than doubled. The Congressional Budget Office projects that another 3.7 million will become uninsured in 2027, reversing some of the huge gains made since the ACA was passed in 2010.

When health insurance costs rise, healthier people may risk going without. Those who remain insured tend to need more health services, requiring those more costly services to be covered by a smaller pool of people and raising premium prices even higher.

The Trump administration has proposed routing the money spent on subsidies directly to eligible Americans to help them purchase health insurance. How much people would receive is unclear, but amounts in previous proposals wouldn’t cover what the subsidies provided.

To sum it up, health care is extremely complicated and there are numerous barriers to reforms, as successive U.S. administrations have learned over the years. Whether the Trump administration finds some success will depend on how well the policies are able to surmount these and other obstacles.The Conversation

About the Author:

Patrick Aguilar, Managing Director of Health, Washington University in St. Louis

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

 

ZTS – Zoetis Inc. has been added to our Stock Watchlist

🚨 ZTS – Zoetis Inc. has just been added to our data-driven Watchlist.

Here are the details:

📈 ZTS – Zoetis Inc.
🏭 Sector: Healthcare
📊 Market Cap: Medium Cap
⚖️ Beta: 0.96 (Moderate Risk)
📉 52W Performance: -26.6%
📊 Quant Score: 50/100 (Watchlist)

Zoetis just beat it’s latest earnings data and has beaten its earnings-per-share estimates for four consecutive quarters. Currently, it has a dividend just below 1.70 percent, with a payout ratio of approximately 35%. The current P/E ratio is slightly above 20 with the 5-year average P/E coming in around 36.

The price trend for ZTS has been lower over the past couple of years with a -26.6% decline in the past 52-weeks. ZTS currently trades around the $126.65 per share level.

Full Disclosure: I do not currently own this stock. Disclaimer: Content is educational purposes and not intended as investment advice.

Week Ahead: USDJPY braces for quadruple risk cocktail

By ForexTime

  • USDJPY ↓ 2.5% YTD
  • Yen expected to be one of the most volatile G10 currencies vs USD
  • US PCE + Japan CPI combo = fresh volatility?
  • Japan CPI forecast to trigger moves of ↑ 0.4% & ↓ 0.2%
  • Bloomberg FX model – 74% USDJPY – (150.21 – 155.26)

Even as anticipation builds ahead of the US CPI report this afternoon (Friday, 13th February), traders are bracing for more high-risk events in the week ahead.

From the Fed’s meeting minutes to the Japan CPI report and the US December PCE index, among other key reports will be in focus:

Monday, 16th February

  • US Markets closed for Presidents’ Day holiday
  • JPY: Japan Q4 GDP, industrial production
  •  EUR: Eurozone Industrial Production (Dec)
  • CAD: Canada Housing Starts (Jan)

 

Tuesday, 17th February

  • AUD: RBA Meeting Minutes
  • GBP: UK Unemployment Rate (Dec)
  • EUR: Germany ZEW Economic Sentiment Index (Feb)
  • JPY: Japan Balance of Trade (Jan)
  • USD: US Empire manufacturing

 

Wednesday, 18th February

  • GBP: UK Inflation Rate (Jan)
  • USD: FOMC Minutes, US Building Permits (Nov, Dec), Durable Goods Orders (Dec), Housing Starts (Nov, Dec)
  • NZD: New Zealand rate decision
  • Crude (WTI, Brent): US API Crude Oil Stock Change (w/e Feb 13)

 

Thursday, 19th February

  • AUD: Australia Employment Data (Jan)
  • USD: US Balance of Trade (Dec), Initial Jobless Claims (w/e Feb 14)
  • EUR: Eurozone Consumer Confidence (Feb)
  • Crude (WTI, Brent): US EIA Crude Oil stocks Change (w/e Feb 13)
  • US30: Walmart earnings

 

Friday, 20th February

  • GBP: UK Retail Sales (Jan), S&P Global Manufacturing & Services PMIs (Feb)
  • EUR: Germany HCOB Manufacturing, Services & Composite PMIs (Feb)
  • CAD: Canada Retail Sales (Jan)
  • JPY: Japan CPI, S&P Global manufacturing
  • USD: US PCE Price Index (Dec), GDP Growth Rate (Q4), Personal Income & Spending (Dec)

 

The USDJPY is back in focus thanks to a string of high-impact data releases from the United States and Japan.

Over the past few weeks, the USDJPY has exhibited heightened volatility amid concerns about intervention, political risk in Japan, and overall dollar volatility.

With the Yen expected to be one of the most volatile G10 currencies versus the USD next week, this could spell fresh trading opportunities.

 

 

Here are 3 reasons why the USDJPY could see significant swings:

 

1) Fed minutes + US December PCE

The Federal Reserve releases minutes from its Jan 27 – 28 meeting, when it held interest rates steady. Any new clues regarding future policy moves may impact expectations for lower rates over the coming months.

But the major risk event for the dollar may be the Fed’s preferred inflation gauge – the Core PCE.

Markets are forecasting the core PCE deflator to rise 2.9% in December compared to 2.8% in the previous month. Ultimately, signs of rising inflationary pressures may further cool bets around the Fed cutting rates anytime soon.

USDJPY is forecast to move 0.2% up or 0.3% down in a 6-hour window after the US PCE report.

 

2) Japan Q4 GDP + Japan CPI

It’s a data heavy week in Japan with the latest GDP figures and key CPI report likely to shape bets around the BoJ hiking rates.

Economic growth is expected to have rebounded in Q4, while CPI is seen cooling 1.6% in January compared to the 2.1% in the previous month.

Traders are currently pricing in a 78% chance that the BoJ hikes rates by April. Any major shifts to these expectations could rock the Japanese Yen.

 

3) Technical forces

The USDJPY is under pressure on the daily charts with prices approaching the 152.00 support level. However, the RSI is approaching oversold levels.

  •  A solid breakout and daily close below 152.00 may open a path toward the 200-day SMA at 150.50.
  •  Should 152.00 prove to be reliable support, this could send prices toward the 100 and 50-day SMA.

Bloomberg’s FX model points to a 74.6% chance that USDJPY will trade within the 150.28 – 155.04 range over the next one-week period.


 

Forex-Time-LogoArticle by ForexTime

 

ForexTime Ltd (FXTM) is an award winning international online forex broker regulated by CySEC 185/12 www.forextime.com

EUR/USD Consolidates Ahead of US Inflation Data

By RoboForex Analytical Department

EUR/USD ended the week at 1.1868, remaining within a narrow sideways range for the fourth consecutive session. The market has adopted a wait-and-see approach ahead of the release of January’s US consumer price index. The report could influence expectations for Federal Reserve policy.

Forecasts suggest a slowdown in headline inflation to 2.5% year-on-year from 2.7%, while core inflation is expected to ease to 2.5% from 2.6%.

Earlier in the week, strong employment data confirmed the resilience of the labour market, although recent jobless claims came in higher than expected. Investors are now pricing in rates remaining unchanged in March, followed by two 25-basis-point cuts in the second half of the year, in June and September.

The broader backdrop for EUR/USD remains clear: most Fed officials have adopted a wait-and-see stance and are not ready to resume rate cuts imminently. Despite previous easing and the current rate range of 3.50-3.75%, inflation remains below 3%, and the economy continues to demonstrate stability. January’s employment data only strengthens the case for a pause.

While some Fed policymakers support further easing, they remain in the minority. The market is shifting expectations for the first cut closer to July. For EUR/USD, this maintains structural support for the dollar. The pair’s next move will depend on inflation and signs of a real cooling in the US economy.

Technical Analysis

On the H4 chart, EUR/USD remains in a sideways consolidation phase following January’s upward momentum. The price is held within the 1.1785-1.1930 range and is currently trading near 1.1870. Bollinger Bands have narrowed, signalling declining volatility. The MACD is hovering near the zero line, indicating weak momentum, while the Stochastic oscillator remains neutral, without a clear directional signal. The market is trading in the middle of the range.

On the H1 chart, price action reflects a tight consolidation with occasional volatility spikes. Buyers quickly absorbed the latest downward move, but attempts to break above 1.1925 have failed. The price has stabilised near the midline of the Bollinger Bands. The MACD remains close to zero, and the Stochastic oscillator is turning lower in neutral territory. In the near term, range trading remains the preferred strategy.

Conclusion

In summary, EUR/USD remains in a state of consolidation, trapped in its narrowest range in weeks as markets await the crucial US inflation report. The pair is caught between two opposing forces: resilient US economic data and delayed Fed easing expectations (supporting the dollar), versus a relatively hawkish ECB stance and already priced-in policy divergence (supporting the euro).

 

Technically, compressed volatility and neutral indicators signal a breakout may be approaching, but its direction will depend entirely on tonight’s CPI outcome. A hotter-than-expected inflation reading would likely push the pair towards the lower boundary at 1.1785, while softer inflation could trigger a retest of resistance near 1.1930. Until then, the range remains the game.

 

Disclaimer

Any forecasts contained herein are based on the author’s particular opinion. This analysis may not be treated as trading advice. RoboForex bears no responsibility for trading results based on trading recommendations and reviews contained herein.