Speculator Extremes: Bitcoin, Copper, GBP & Lean Hogs lead Bullish & Bearish Positions

By InvestMacro 

The latest update for the weekly Commitment of Traders (COT) report was released by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) on Friday for data ending on Tuesday June 23rd.

This weekly Extreme Positions report highlights the Most Bullish and Most Bearish Positions for the speculator category and is a current snapshot of how speculators were positioned as of Tuesday. Extreme positioning in these markets can foreshadow strong moves in the underlying market.

To signify an extreme position, we use the Strength Index (also known as the COT Index) of each instrument, a common method of measuring COT data. The Strength Index is simply a comparison of current trader positions against the range of positions over the previous 3 years. We use over 80 percent as extremely bullish and under 20 percent as extremely bearish (Compare Strength Index scores across all markets in the data table or cot leaders table).

The 6-WK Trend score is the change in the Strength Index over the past 6 weeks and signals how strong and which way the Strength Index is going.


Extreme Bullish Speculator Table


Here Are This Week’s Most Bullish Speculator Positions:

Bitcoin

Extreme Bullish Leader
The Bitcoin speculator position comes in as the most bullish extreme standing this week as the speculators tend to use the futures as a hedging instrument for Bitcoin. The Bitcoin speculator level is currently at a 100 percent score of its 3-year range.

The six-week trend for the percent strength score totaled a rise higher by 38 percentage points this week while the overall net speculator position was a total of 3,524 net contracts this week with an increase of 49 contract in the weekly speculator bets.


Speculators or Non-Commercials Notes:

Speculators, classified as non-commercial traders by the CFTC, are made up of large commodity funds, hedge funds and other significant for-profit participants. The Specs are generally regarded as trend-followers in their behavior towards price action – net speculator bets and prices tend to go in the same directions. These traders often look to buy when prices are rising and sell when prices are falling. To illustrate this point, many times speculator contracts can be found at their most extremes (bullish or bearish) when prices are also close to their highest or lowest levels.

These extreme levels can be dangerous for the large speculators as the trade is most crowded, there is less trading ammunition still sitting on the sidelines to push the trend further and prices have moved a significant distance. When the trend becomes exhausted, some speculators take profits while others look to also exit positions when prices fail to continue in the same direction. This process usually plays out over many months to years and can ultimately create a reverse effect where prices start to fall and speculators start a process of selling when prices are falling.

 


Copper

Extreme Bullish Leader
The Copper speculator position comes next in the extreme standings this week with the Copper speculator level now at a 94 percent score of its 3-year range.

The six-week trend for the percent strength score was a decline of -4 percentage points this week. The speculator position registered 71,620 net contracts this week with a decrease of -3,730 contracts in speculator bets.


Cotton

Extreme Bullish Leader
The Cotton speculator position comes in third this week in the extreme standings as the Cotton speculator level resides at a 89 percent score of its 3-year range.

The six-week trend for the speculator strength score came in at a decline of -11 percentage points this week and the overall speculator position was 83,558 net contracts this week with an increase of 4,881 contracts in the weekly speculator bets.


Steel

Extreme Bullish Leader
The Steel speculator position comes up number four in the extreme standings this week as the Steel speculator level is currently at an 87 percent score of its 3-year range.

The six-week trend for the speculator strength score totaled a boost of 2 percentage points this week while the overall speculator position was 11,781 net contracts this week with a decline of -216 contracts in the speculator bets.


5-Year Bond

Extreme Bullish Leader
The 5-Year Bond speculator position rounds out the top five in this week’s bullish extreme standings with the 5-Year speculator level sitting at a 82 percent score of its 3-year range. The six-week trend for the speculator strength score was an advance by 4 percentage points this week.

The speculator position was -1,301,269 net contracts this week with a rise of 48,908 contracts in the weekly speculator bets.


The Most Bearish Speculator Positions of the Week:

Extreme Bearish Speculator Table


British Pound

Extreme Bearish Leader
The British Pound speculator position comes in as the most bearish extreme standing this week as the GBP speculator level is at a 0 percent minimum score of its 3-year range.

The six-week trend for the speculator strength score was a decrease by -25 percentage points this week and the overall speculator position was -105,719 net contracts this week with a retreat of -34,134 contracts in the speculator bets.


Lean Hogs

Extreme Bearish Leader
The Lean Hogs speculator position comes in second for the most bearish extreme standing on the week with the Lean Hogs speculator level at a 1 percent score of its 3-year range.

The six-week trend for the speculator strength score was a retreat of -34 percentage points this week while the speculator position was -57,209 net contracts this week with a rise of 2,133 contracts in the weekly speculator bets.


New Zealand Dollar

Extreme Bearish Leader
The New Zealand Dollar speculator position comes in as third most bearish extreme standing of the week. The NZD speculator level resides at a 2 percent score of its 3-year range.

The six-week trend for the speculator strength score was a decrease by -18 percentage points this week and the overall speculator position was -54,844 net contracts this week with a decline of -9,683 contracts in the speculator bets.


Cocoa Futures

Extreme Bearish Leader
The Cocoa Futures speculator position comes in as this week’s fourth most bearish extreme standing as the Cocoa speculator level is at just a 3 percent score of its 3-year range.

The six-week trend for the speculator strength score was a retreat of -6 percentage points this week and the speculator position was -19,789 net contracts this week with an advance of 1,091 contracts in the weekly speculator bets.


3-Month Secured Overnight Financing Rate

Extreme Bearish Leader
Lastly, the 3-Month Secured Overnight Financing Rate speculator position comes in as the fifth most bearish extreme standing for this week with the SOFR 3-Months speculator level at a 3 percent score of its 3-year range.

The six-week trend for the speculator strength score was a decrease by -45 percentage points this week while the speculator position was -2,808,392 net contracts this week with an addition of 100,586 contracts in the weekly speculator bets.


Article By InvestMacroReceive our weekly COT Reports by Email

*COT Report: The COT data, released weekly to the public each Friday, is updated through the most recent Tuesday (data is 3 days old) and shows a quick view of how large speculators or non-commercials (for-profit traders) were positioned in the futures markets.

The CFTC categorizes trader positions according to commercial hedgers (traders who use futures contracts for hedging as part of the business), non-commercials (large traders who speculate to realize trading profits) and nonreportable traders (usually small traders/speculators) as well as their open interest (contracts open in the market at time of reporting).See CFTC criteria here.

All information and opinions on this website and contained in this article are for general informational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice.

GBP/USD Ends the Month with Its Worst Performance in a Year

By RoboForex Analytical Department

The GBP/USD pair continued to decline against the US dollar on Friday and is set to close June with its worst monthly performance since July last year, trading near 1.3182. Since the start of the month, sterling has lost around 2.2%. Current levels are the lowest since November last year.

Several factors are weighing on the British currency. First, lower oil prices following the easing of tensions between the US and Iran have reduced inflation risks and lowered the likelihood of more aggressive rate hikes by the Bank of England. The market now expects only one rate increase before the end of the year, compared with two that were priced in just a few weeks ago.

Domestic UK politics has become an additional source of uncertainty. Following the resignation of Prime Minister Keir Starmer, investors are awaiting the appointment of a new head of government and, most importantly, a new finance minister. Andy Burnham is seen as the most likely successor, although the composition of the future government’s economic team remains unclear.

The market is closely watching the new cabinet’s staffing decisions. These appointments will shape the country’s future fiscal policy and influence investor sentiment towards British assets.

Technical Analysis

On the H4 chart of GBP/USD, the market completed a downward wave to 1.3140 and a growth wave towards 1.3217. In practice, a wide consolidation range is forming around 1.3200.

If the pair breaks out of this range to the upside, the potential will open for the wave to continue towards 1.3240. If the pair breaks out to the downside, the potential will open for a continuation of the decline towards 1.3033.

Technically, this scenario is confirmed by the MACD indicator. Its signal line is below the zero mark and is pointing firmly downwards.

On the H1 chart, GBP/USD formed a compact consolidation range around 1.3180. At the moment, the range has expanded downwards to 1.3140. Further growth towards 1.3220 is expected, followed by a decline to 1.3060.

The Stochastic oscillator also supports this scenario. Its signal line is below 50 and is pointing firmly downwards towards 20.

Disclaimer

Any forecasts contained herein are based on the author’s particular opinion. This analysis may not be treated as trading advice. RoboForex bears no responsibility for trading results based on trading recommendations and reviews contained herein.

Oil prices fall back to pre‑war levels. Silver drops to a 7‑month low

By JustMarkets 

On Wednesday, the US stock indices closed mixed as caution persisted in the technology sector. By the end of the day, the Dow Jones Index (US30) rose by 0.35%. The S&P 500 Index (US500) declined by 0.10%. The Technology Index NASDAQ (US100) closed lower by 0.43%. Investors attempted to assess whether real demand for AI infrastructure can justify the enormous capital expenditures of major IT giants. Traditional sectors of the economy, by contrast, received notable support. Easing inflation concerns due to the prospect of a rapid resumption of energy exports from the Middle East pushed US Treasury yields lower. As a result, the Dow Jones outperformed. The Index was also supported by expectations of a major reshuffling: on Monday, June 29, Alphabet (Google’s parent company) will officially replace Verizon in the Dow Jones Industrial Average, significantly increasing the weight of the technology and AI sectors in this historic benchmark.

The Canadian dollar (USD/CAD) posted a sharp decline, falling to a yearly low of 1.42 per US dollar. The main driver of the “loonie’s” weakness was the powerful global rally of the US dollar. Traders are aggressively pricing in a hawkish scenario in the United States after several FOMC members under Kevin Warsh signaled the need for more than one rate hike before the end of 2026. Unlike the Fed’s firm stance, the Bank of Canada (BoC) is taking a far more cautious and patient approach, depriving the national currency of monetary support.

At the end of June, the Mexican peso fell to 17.6 per US dollar, hitting its lowest level since early April. The main driver of the peso’s weakness was the sharp global strengthening of the US dollar against both developed and emerging‑market currencies. Meanwhile, domestic Mexican factors removed fundamental support for the peso. Fresh economic data showed that headline inflation in Mexico unexpectedly slowed to a ten‑month low of 3.55% in the first half of June, while core inflation also fell more than expected. This cooling of price growth, combined with a weakening national economy (GDP contracted by 0.6% in Q1), strengthened the case for further monetary easing by the Bank of Mexico, which has already cut its policy rate to 6.50%.

European indices traded without a unified direction yesterday. By the end of the day, Germany’s DAX (DE40) fell by 0.62%, France’s CAC 40 (FR40) rose by 0.54%, Spain’s IBEX 35 (ES35) declined by 0.45%, and the UK’s FTSE 100 (UK100) closed higher by 0.31%.

On Wednesday, silver prices (XAG/USD) plunged by roughly 5%, falling to $59 per ounce and hitting their lowest level since December of last year amid a broad strengthening of the US dollar. With inflation concerns easing and oil prices falling below $70, silver lost its key growth drivers. However, strong industrial demand from green energy and AI‑related infrastructure may prevent the metal from falling below the critical support zone of $55-56.

The US crude oil (WTI) prices fell below the psychological $70 per barrel mark during trading (with lows at $69.63), hitting their lowest levels since late February – the beginning of the conflict’s hot phase. The sharp decline (40% from wartime peaks) is driven by the rapid disappearance of the geopolitical risk premium. After the interim agreement between the US and Iran, shipowners began confidently restoring traffic through the Strait of Hormuz with transponders on, having received official safety guarantees from the UN’s International Maritime Organization (IMO). According to the IEA, exports from the UAE have already recovered to 85% of pre‑crisis levels, while total oil shipments from the Persian Gulf recently reached around 60 million barrels.

On Wednesday, Japan’s Nikkei 225 (JP225) fell by 0.88%, China’s FTSE China A50 closed higher by 0.39%, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng (HK50) rose by 0.33%, and Australia’s ASX 200 (AU200) closed higher by 0.24%. The Hang Seng Index fell to 23,106, retracing the previous session’s gains and hitting its lowest level since June 2025. Investors chose to lock in profits and act cautiously ahead of Hong Kong’s fresh trade balance data, pushing the benchmark to two‑year lows. However, the decline was partially offset by a strong rally in the Asian tech sector.

On Thursday, the Australian dollar (AUD) broke key support and fell below 0.690 USD, settling near a three‑month low amid a powerful global rally of the US dollar. This aggressive decline in the “aussie” occurred despite strong domestic labor‑market data: in May, Australia created 40,300 new jobs after April’s drop of 40,600, while the unemployment rate predictably fell to 4.4%. Nevertheless, the positive employment report only intensified investor concerns about the Reserve Bank of Australia’s next steps, as a strong labor market combined with high core inflation gives the regulator room to continue its tightening cycle.

S&P 500 (US500) 7,358.22 -7.24 (-0.10%)

Dow Jones (US30) 51,666.84 +182.06 (+0.35%)

DAX (DE40) 24,740.36 -153.22 (-0.62%)

FTSE 100 (UK100) 10,461.63 +32.78 (+0.31%)

USD Index 101.61 +0.20 (+0.20%)

News feed for: 2026.06.25

  • Australia Unemployment Rate (m/m) at 04:30 (GMT+3) – AUD (MED)
  • German GfK Consumer Climate (m/m) at 09:00 (GMT+3) – EUR (MED)
  • US PCE Price index (m/m) at 15:30 (GMT+3) – USD (HIGH)
  • US Initial Jobless Claims (w/w) at 15:30 (GMT+3) – USD (MED)
  • US Durable Goods Orders (m/m) at 15:30 (GMT+3) – USD (MED)
  • US Final GDP (m/m) at 15:30 (GMT+3) – USD (MED)
  • US Natural Gas Storage (w/w) at 17:30 (GMT+3) – XNG (HIGH)
  • Mexico Interest Rate Decision at 22:00 (GMT+3) – MXN (HIGH)

By JustMarkets

 

This article reflects a personal opinion and should not be interpreted as an investment advice, and/or offer, and/or a persistent request for carrying out financial transactions, and/or a guarantee, and/or a forecast of future events.

Gold Falls to an Eight-Month Low: This May Not Be the Bottom

By RoboForex Analytical Department

Gold stabilised near 4,000 USD per troy ounce on Thursday but remained close to its lowest levels in almost eight months. The market continues to face pressure from a stronger US dollar and growing expectations of further monetary policy tightening by the Federal Reserve.

The US Dollar Index refreshed its highest level in more than a year, making gold more expensive for buyers using other currencies. This traditionally reduces demand for the precious metal.

Last week, the Federal Reserve left interest rates unchanged but signalled that it remained ready to tighten policy further. Fed Chair Kevin Warsh once again reaffirmed the regulator’s commitment to fighting inflation. The market is now pricing in a high probability of a rate hike as early as September, with the possibility of further moves before the end of the year.

Expectations of higher interest rates are currently outweighing the support that gold could have received from lower geopolitical tensions.

Progress in negotiations between the US and Iran helped oil prices return to the levels seen before the conflict and significantly reduced inflation risks. As a result, demand for safe-haven assets was left without strong support.

Technical Analysis

On the H4 chart of XAU/USD, the market formed a consolidation range around 4,099 and completed a downward wave to 3,960. We expect a corrective move towards 4,099, testing this level from below. After that, the probability of a new decline towards 3,869 may be considered, with the potential for the wave to extend to 3,828.

The MACD indicator confirms the current downward impulse. The signal line is below the central line and is pointing firmly downwards.

On the H1 chart, the market broke below 4,099 and completed a downward wave towards 3,960. Going forward, the possibility of a correction towards 4,099 may be considered, with this level tested from below.

In practice, a trend-continuation pattern is forming to the downside. After that, a decline towards 3,860 is expected, with the potential for the trend to continue towards 3,828.

The Stochastic oscillator confirms this scenario: the signal line remains below 50 and is under pressure to decline towards 20.

 

Disclaimer

Any forecasts contained herein are based on the author’s particular opinion. This analysis may not be treated as trading advice. RoboForex bears no responsibility for trading results based on trading recommendations and reviews contained herein.

How local communities are challenging Big Tech data centers’ noise, pollution and rising electricity bills

By Rachel Mural, Harvard Kennedy School 

As the race to build data centers across the United States accelerates, local governments worry that the tech industry mantra of “move fast and break things” means their communities are at risk of being broken.

I’m a Harvard researcher studying the relationship between data centers and energy. I’ve closely monitored how local governments respond to proposals or even just concerns about the potential for data centers in their communities. What I’ve found is a complex story of community needs, political tensions and corporate power – all interacting with local, state and national democratic processes.

Promises and potential

Technology companies stay competitive by being ready to provide data and communications services even before customer demand rises. Data centers already power online communications, shopping and banking systems. Now, expanding demand for artificial intelligence has led to over 1,000 pending data center proposals across the country.

Federal actions also drive development. The Trump administration has identified data center build-out as a strategic priority. The administration has promoted data center capacity as a measure of American strength and signaled that federal regulations on data centers may be eased.

At the community level, technology companies claim that data centers bring jobs, economic revitalization, digital connectivity and economic growth to local communities.

Not great neighbors

So far, however, data centers’ benefits are overshadowed by more visible harms.

Nearby residents experience higher air pollution and excess noise. Data processing also uses a lot of water to cool the buildings and their equipment.

Simultaneously, electricity prices continue to outpace inflation, burdening families across the country. These trends reflect, in part, the costly infrastructure investments needed to power data centers.

The local movement

My research has found that local governments across the U.S. are trying to avoid or reduce these harms.

Some counties and cities that don’t have specific zoning rules and regulations for data center development are using short-term moratoriums. These pauses in data center permitting and construction give communities time to consider how to define new laws and regulations about the facilities’ location, electricity use, water conservation and noise buffering.

Speaking about his town’s decision to impose a one-year data center moratorium, Rick Bella, the town council president in Merrillville, Indiana, about 40 miles southeast of Chicago, stressed a desire to “evaluate real-world impacts and learn from a project developing right next door before determining what may or may not be appropriate for Merrillville.”

Other places want to block data centers altogether. In April 2026, for example, the Ypsilanti Community Utilities Authority near Detroit, Michigan, passed a yearlong halt to the “delivery, commitment, reservation, extension, or approval of water and sewer services” for data centers. The move blocks data centers, including one under development by the University of Michigan and Los Alamos National Laboratory, from getting the water they need to operate.

Separately, towns across Ohio, Wisconsin, Maryland, Nevada and California have put questions related to data centers on their local ballots. Through these referendums, voters can weigh in on construction bans, tax incentives and zoning ordinances.

Power struggles

While public attitudes around data centers have remained largely nonpartisan, local and state officials don’t always see eye to eye.

Officials in Hood County, Texas, for example, rejected a proposal for a six-month moratorium after a state senator urged the Texas attorney general to intervene and prevent the measure.

In 2025, West Virginia passed a bill that reduces local governments’ zoning and regulatory powers in relation to data centers and microgrids. A similar bill in New Hampshire’s legislature was defeated in May 2026.

Tech companies are also flexing their legal and financial muscles. For example, data center developers sued Saline Township, Michigan, and Chatham County, North Carolina, seeking to overturn their local zoning decisions, to be able to proceed with data center construction.

Changing tides

Local pushback comes at a pivotal moment for artificial intelligence technology itself.

As seen in objections to the internet’s expanding AI “slop,” backlash over AI-generated Super Bowl ads, worries about an AI-related financial bubble and complaints about Google’s pivot to AI-directed search, Americans are reckoning with AI’s role in society.

Further, many people are questioning the role of technology broadly. Increasing numbers of teens and adults are addicted to their smartphones, emotionally and psychologically dependent on their availability. Parents and teachers are questioning the usefulness of various types of digital technologies in classrooms. Even the pope has warned that technology must serve humanity – and not the other way around.

Americans are responding to this moment through the power of their voices and votes.

Technology companies may view moratoriums and new regulations as delays in project development. But the town hall discussions, community coalitions, public petitions and even farmers’ unions reflect American democracy at work.

In Sunbury, Ohio, local officials considered a moratorium only after witnessing the scope of public protest over a proposed data center.

In April 2026, voters in Festus, Missouri, removed several City Council members after they supported a new data center despite resident pushback.

The question of whether a community wants or should have a data center does not have a universal answer. I believe it’s a question that deserves deliberate processes, transparency and consideration.

To me, these local-level actions reflect a desire to slow down. There is little question that data centers and AI will be part of our collective future. Today, communities are asking for a fair say in what their futures will be.The Conversation

About the Author:

Rachel Mural, Senior Research Associate in Environment and Natural Resources and Science, Technology, and Public Policy, Harvard Kennedy School

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

 

Quantum sensors could spot hidden damage in the thousands of US bridges rated ‘structurally deficient’

By Alex Krasnok, Florida International University 

Every bridge has parts that drivers never see: steel buried in concrete, welds tucked under girders, and soil packed around foundations below the waterline. A bridge can look fine from the road while rust spreads around steel hidden inside concrete. A small fatigue crack can lengthen. A flood can wash soil away from a pier. By the time cracks, loose concrete or lane closures appear, the cheapest repair window may already have closed.

When it comes to these damaged bridges, this problem is national. The United States has more than 624,000 highway bridges. About 220,000 need major repair or replacement, and 41,677 are rated poor, also called structurally deficient. While “poor” does not mean unsafe, it does mean at least one key bridge element received a poor rating, indicating deterioration or cracking that will require significant repair.

As a researcher who studies photonics and quantum sensing, I work on devices that measure faint or hidden signals. My lab applies physics to develop devices, including quantum sensors. Advanced sensors of this type might one day be able to help engineers pinpoint where to look to determine whether hidden damage in infrastructure is worsening. However, they cannot replace human inspectors.

The Dames Point Bridge spans a river in Jacksonville, Fla.
Jonathan Zander/Wikimedia Commons, CC BY

Inspections keep bridges safe, but are snapshots

Federal bridge inspections – rooted in National Bridge Inspection Standards mandated by Congress in 1968 – exist because past failures showed that small defects can threaten large structures.

Under current federal rules, many bridges must be inspected in, at most, 24-month intervals. Higher-risk bridges, such as those carrying heavy interstate traffic, those with aging structures or known defects, or those built over saltwater, may require shorter intervals. Lower-risk bridges with lighter traffic and sound materials may qualify for longer intervals.

Those inspections remain essential, but they are snapshots. A bridge may change during the months between visits. Corrosion can spread below a deck that looks sound. A small crack can sit inside a weld. A river can displace soil from a foundation while the roadway above looks unchanged. Sensors extend inspections by tracking these change that form between scheduled checks.

Hidden damage can grow quietly

The three common hidden threats to bridges are corrosion, fatigue and scour. Corrosion begins when water, oxygen and salts reach steel. A concrete layer usually protects steel, but cracks, salt spray and chloride ions from seawater or deicing salts can break that protection. The rust then expands, much like ice widening a crack in a sidewalk. It pushes the concrete outward and can cause the material to come loose or the layers to separate.

Fatigue damage is the bridge version of bending a paper clip back and forth. Just as a paper clip eventually snaps after repeated bending, a bridge’s steel components weaken and break down under continuous cycles of stress. Thousands of heavy vehicles can make tiny cracks grow near welds, bolted connections or older steel details.

Scour damage is different: Moving water removes soil around the bridge’s foundations. The bridge above can look stable, while the support below loses the ground it needs.

Waiting costs more

The earlier engineers can identify damage to aging bridges, the more time and options they have to fix them. The average U.S. bridge is about 47 years old. Many bridges are near or past the 50-year life they were designed for, and about 45% have exceeded their planned design lives.

Typically, it’s less costly to preserve bridges in fair condition than those already in poor condition. Making all the identified necessary U.S. bridge repairs would cost about US$467 billion.

Past failures show why small details matter. As one example, the 2007 I-35W bridge collapse in Minneapolis was partially due to undersized gusset plates – steel plates that connect the intersecting beams in a bridge’s structural framework – along with added weight and construction loads. The collapse killed 13 people and injured 145.

Monitoring bridges can pinpoint structural damage that could eventually lead to devastating collapses.

Sensors alone are not a cure for such failures, but better measurements can help engineers notice when important details are changing.

Sensors help engineers look, listen and scan

Sensor systems are easiest to categorize based on what they do.

Some sensors see: Drones can photograph cracks and loose concrete, infrared cameras can show heat patterns linked to damaged deck zones, and LiDAR, short for light detection and ranging, can build three-dimensional maps.

Some sensors listen: Ultrasonic testing and impact-echo probes send sound waves into concrete or steel, acoustic emission sensors listen for active cracking, and accelerometers track how a bridge vibrates.

Some sensors scan below the surface. Specialized radio tools try to locate hidden steel, trapped moisture, empty pockets or crumbling layers inside the concrete. Meanwhile, magnetic and electrical instruments attempt to guess whether that buried steel is rusting away.

The value of sensors often comes from combining methods. One bridge deck inspection robot uses subsurface radar, electrical tools that measure moisture, and a standard camera to collect data. It then builds simple visual maps showing the exact health of the bridge deck. Fiber-optic sensing could be another route. Researchers have shown that existing telecommunication cables can record bridge vibration signatures.

Sensors are evidence, not verdicts

While instruments provide crucial clues about a structure’s condition, they do not automatically dictate the solution. Engineers still need to examine the bridge design, inspection history, traffic loads, weather, material condition and measurement uncertainty before deciding whether to repair, restrict traffic or close a bridge.

Field data is messy. Wet concrete can blur radar results. Traffic, wind and temperature can mask vibration changes.

The best systems answer narrow questions: Where is the concrete deck beginning to split into horizontal layers underneath the surface? Is this crack actively widening? Is a suspension cable losing its structural strength because its inner steel wires are rusting away? Is the fast-moving water washing away the critical soil supporting the bridge’s underwater foundations after a storm?

Quantum sensors are a frontier

Quantum sensors may help when the signs of structural distress are weak, buried or noisy. These devices use quantum systems, such as atoms or electron spins, as highly sensitive probes.

By measuring how these atomic properties shift in response to extremely subtle changes in gravity, motion or magnetic fields, the sensors can detect flaws that traditional instruments miss.

For bridges, the nearest-term opportunity is likely magnetic inspection. My team and I co-authored a review, which has not yet been peer-reviewed, on quantum magnetometers for infrastructure inspection. These sensors identify signals from induction responses, magnetic flux leakage, stress, corrosion and operational currents.

In plain terms, these sensors may help map weak magnetic fields near steel, cables or electrical conductors. Changes or disruptions in these local magnetic fields can reveal hidden rust, snapped wire strands inside a thick suspension cable, or abnormal stress points in the steel before a crack even forms.

a small piece of electronics
Atomic magnetometers are a type of sensor that use atoms in a vapor cell to measure faint magnetic fields. They can operate at room temperature.
J. Kitching/NIST

The hard part is not building a record-setting sensor in a quiet lab, but rather making a device that works on a noisy bridge, near traffic, weather, steel and electrical interference. Quantum sensors will matter only where they beat cheaper classical tools in real inspection conditions.

The goal is not to make every bridge smart. The goal is to make damage harder to hide. Sensors give engineers more ways to see inside concrete, steel, soil and water, turning some surprise closures into repairs planned months earlier.

The public may never notice the best use of bridge sensors. That is the point: The safest infrastructure technology often works before a problem becomes visible from the road.The Conversation

About the Author:

Alex Krasnok, Assistant Professor of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Florida International University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

How everyone pays the cost for patents on seeds, and private companies get rich from keeping them secret

By Julie Dawson, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Kiki Hubbard, University of Wisconsin-Madison, and Paulina Jenney, University of Wisconsin-Madison 

The United States is one of only a handful of countries that allows companies to hold patents on plant varieties. As a result, a small number of corporations can – and do – suppress competition in the seed industry, stifle innovation and turn taxpayer subsidies intended for farmers into corporate profits.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture has found that two companies control more than 70% of U.S. corn and soybean seed sales, and the top four cottonseed companies control nearly 94% of that market.

In a May 2026 court filing in a legal dispute between two U.S. seed companies, the Department of Justice said patents on seeds are obstructing competition and research in the agriculture industry.

As researchers who work on plant breeding and seed policy, we have seen how that plays out. When huge companies assert their patents, smaller businesses and public plant breeders who often lack the legal resources to fight back are frequently dissuaded from conducting research and development that might actually not be illegal at all.

And a lack of competition allows dominant companies – not always based in the U.S. – to collect large sums of taxpayer money that Congress allocated in hopes it would help farmers, not shareholders’ and executives’ bottom lines.

Noah Coppess, a farmer in Iowa, testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Oct. 28, 2025.

A shift in ownership

For most of human agricultural history, farmers freely saved, exchanged and planted seeds season after season, creating a diversity of crops suited to the places and people who grew them.

While some communities restricted the exchange of seeds for cultural or ceremonial reasons, seeds were broadly understood to be a shared resource. Even as recently as the 1970s, most plant breeding was carried out by public researchers at government stations and universities, while private companies focused on producing and selling those varieties at scale.

That diverse and decentralized system also served as an invisible insurance policy against disease and disaster: If one variety failed, there were plenty of others distinct enough to fill its place.

Beginning in the 20th century, though, governments began to grant companies patents on living organisms, beginning with a genetically engineered bacterium that broke down crude oil. Suddenly, chemical and pharmaceutical companies saw opportunities to earn money by engineering specific traits, such as herbicide tolerance, into key crop plants, including corn, soybeans, cotton and canola, and patenting those varieties.

Then they used those patent rights to prohibit other plant breeders, even university researchers, from conducting research and breeding with their seeds and to forbid farmers from saving their own seeds from one season to the next.

Those steps eliminated seed companies’ two most obvious sources of competition: other developers building on their work and farmers saving seed. The seed companies then had enough market power to set prices so high they took nearly all of farmers’ potential profits, while leaving them just enough of a margin to remain customers.

According to a report from the Department of Agriculture’s Economic Research Service, the price for genetically engineered seeds has more than quintupled since 1990, rising by 463%. But over that same period of time, the price farmers have received for their crops has increased only by 56%.

Subsidies get diverted

When the prices farmers receive for certain crops fall below a certain threshold, or when farmers suffer losses from bad weather or unexpected trade disputes, the Department of Agriculture has a multitude of programs that offer payments to make up the difference.

But that money tends to spend little time in farmers’ pockets.

An August 2025 study shows that when farm subsidies increase, seed companies respond by raising their prices, charging based on what farmers can afford to pay rather than their own cost of producing and marketing the seed. Specifically, for every 1% increase in farm subsidies, seed companies raise their prices by 0.5%.

And when farmers go to sell their crops to grain processors, those companies benefit from being able to purchase commodity grains, such as corn, soybeans and canola, at a predictable price, held low because subsidies help farmers produce an abundant supply at margins that would otherwise drive farms out of business.

Testifying at an October 2025 Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on competition issues in the seed and fertilizer industries, Iowa farmer Noah Coppess put it plainly: “The reality in farming today is we’re price takers rather than price makers. That’s especially true when consolidation limits our options. … I have concerns with our input and equipment supply chains and their ability to manipulate our costs.”

The result is a system in which public money intended for farmers is redistributed to the seed suppliers and commodity purchasers who profit on either side of them.

Limiting research

Dominant seed companies prevent competitors from developing new breeding programs through a complex web of patents and restrictive licensing contracts that make it nearly impossible to acquire enough genetic material to get started.

The patent system is built on the premise that applicants must completely disclose how their inventions were made in order to get protection. This allows the public to understand the scope of the invention, as well as to improve upon it.

Genetic analyses on the protected seeds would be required to understand how a variety was bred and the genetic traits it contains. However, seed companies have also threatened independent researchers with patent-infringement lawsuits. Those threats prevent independent researchers from studying the crops that make up the country’s supply of food, feed, fuel and fiber.

The result is that no one outside of the dominant companies, not even the U.S. government, knows which economically crucial crops, most of which are grown from patented seeds, might be vulnerable to emerging pests and pathogens. For years, plant breeders have been calling for genetic assessments of these seeds and the crops they grow; to date, no such studies have been conducted.

A shift in direction

But the May 2026 Justice Department court filing saying seed patents are blocking agricultural competition and research indicates the tide may be turning.

In 2023, multinational agrochemical company Corteva sued a genetic engineering startup, Inari, for infringing its patents by, among other things, obtaining samples of Corteva’s patented seeds from a public repository and analyzing their genetic makeup.

Though the Justice Department didn’t weigh in favor of either company, its court filing said companies should not be able to restrict the public from sequencing genetic material that was deposited as part of the process of securing patent protection.

Notably, the department’s court filing came from the Antitrust Division rather than the Civil Division, which usually handles intellectual property issues. That difference suggests that the government sees this extension of patent rights as an illegitimate way for a company to exclude other companies from competing.

The case is still winding its way through the legal process. But if the judge agrees, his decision could be consequential. For starters, competitors could begin to understand the strengths and weaknesses in seed varieties on the market and find ways to build on that innovation, which is precisely the type of activity the patent system was designed to encourage.

More competition in the market could provide an important check on seed prices, reducing the burden on American farmers and, thereby, taxpayers. Finally, researchers could conduct the studies that are needed to begin rebuilding the kind of genetic knowledge that was, for most of human history, held in common – an insurance policy in the best interest of us all.The Conversation

About the Authors:

Julie Dawson, Professor of Plant and Agroecosystem Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Kiki Hubbard, Researcher, Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, and Paulina Jenney, Research Coordinator, Urban and Regional Food System Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

 

Stock indices came under heavy selling pressure amid growing skepticism about AI investments

By JustMarkets 

On Tuesday, the US stock indices closed sharply lower due to a large‑scale sell‑off in the technology sector. By the end of the day, the Dow Jones Index (US30) fell by 1.44%. The S&P 500 Index (US500) declined by 1.44%. The Technology Index NASDAQ (US100) closed down by 3.29% amid growing investor skepticism regarding the profitability of massive investments by major hyperscale companies into artificial intelligence infrastructure. An additional trigger for the decline in chipmakers was the decision by South Korea’s SK Hynix to partially redirect capacity from advanced AI‑chip production toward standard DRAM memory, signaling a potential cooling of demand. Against this backdrop, shares of AI‑race leaders posted sharp losses: Nvidia dropped 4.2%, Broadcom 3.1%, AMD 5.8%, Qualcomm 8%, while Micron and Sandisk plunged 13.2% and 11.2%, respectively. The market capitalization of Tesla and Oracle also fell by 5.8%.

Pressure on the stock market was further intensified by the bond market, where US Treasury yields remained at multi‑month highs, depriving traditional sectors of room for recovery. This occurred despite the continued decline in energy prices, as investors continue to price in the Fed’s hawkish dot‑plot projections.
In June 2026, the preliminary US Services PMI (S&P Global US Services PMI) showed moderate improvement, rising to 51.3 from May’s 50.7. Although the figure slightly exceeded market expectations (51.0) and marked the fastest expansion in the sector since February, the detailed report indicates persistent structural problems. The short‑term boost in business activity was largely driven by the FIFA World Cup, while underlying consumer and investment demand remained subdued due to high prices and the Fed’s tight interest‑rate policy.

European indices mostly declined yesterday. By the end of the day, Germany’s DAX (DE40) fell by 0.98%, France’s CAC 40 (FR40) closed down by 0.71%, Spain’s IBEX 35 (ES35) dropped by 0.34%, and the UK’s FTSE 100 (UK100) ended the session lower by 0.09%.

Global crude oil prices hit a three‑month low: US WTI fell to $73.1 per barrel (with intraday lows at $72.48), while European benchmark Brent corrected toward $77. The main driver of the decline was the 60‑day general sanctions waiver issued by the US Treasury. This step legally opened access for global refineries and buyers to Iranian crude and petroleum products, effectively removing the geopolitical risk premium and pushing prices down 40% from the conflict‑driven peak. The further trajectory of prices will depend directly on institutional factors. Given the Fed’s tight monetary stance under Kevin Warsh and weak global energy demand, full stabilization is possible only after the final signing of the agreement in Geneva, de‑escalation in Lebanon between Israel and Hezbollah, and complete de‑mining of the Strait of Hormuz, which has now restored shipping to 85% of pre‑crisis levels.

On Tuesday, Japan’s Nikkei 225 (JP225) fell by 3.55%, China’s FTSE China A50 closed down by 2.74%, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng (HK50) declined by 1.82%, and Australia’s ASX 200 (AU200) closed lower by 0.33%.

The Australian dollar stabilized around 0.691, holding near its lowest levels in eleven weeks. The newly released macroeconomic inflation report for May left investors with mixed impressions. On one hand, the annual headline inflation rate slowed more than expected – from 4.2% to 4.0% – hitting a three‑month low thanks to a significant drop in retail gasoline prices. On the other hand, core price pressure proved extremely persistent: the volatility‑adjusted Trimmed Mean CPI – the indicator used by the regulator – rose by 0.4% for the month and pushed annual core inflation higher, from 3.4% to 3.6%.

S&P 500 (US500) 7,365.46 -107.33 (-1.44%)

Dow Jones (US30) 51,666.84 -45.87 (-0.09%)

DAX (DE40) 24,893.58 -246.11 (-0.98%)

FTSE 100 (UK100) 10,437.85 -9.00 (-0.09%)

USD Index 101.39 +0.37 (+0.37%)

News feed for: 2026.06.24

  • Australia Inflation Rate (m/m) at 04:30 (GMT+3) – AUD (HIGH)
  • German Ifo Business Climate (m/m) at 11:00 (GMT+3) – EUR (MED)
  • US New Home Sales (m/m) at 17:00 (GMT+3) – USD (LOW)
  • US Crude Oil Reserves (w/w) at 17:30 (GMT+3) – WTI (HIGH)

By JustMarkets

 

This article reflects a personal opinion and should not be interpreted as an investment advice, and/or offer, and/or a persistent request for carrying out financial transactions, and/or a guarantee, and/or a forecast of future events.

The Pound Is Pressured Not by Politics, but by a Strong US Dollar

By RoboForex Analytical Department

The GBP/USD pair fell to 1.3193 on Wednesday. The British pound came under pressure amid a stronger US dollar and political uncertainty in the UK following the announcement of Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s resignation.

Andy Burnham is considered the main contender for the post of head of government and has already received support from several influential figures within the ruling party. Markets are generally taking the prospect of his appointment positively, as investors expect a smooth transfer of power without serious shocks to the economy or financial markets.

The appointment of a new finance minister also remains in focus. Wes Streeting is seen as the favourite for the role. Market participants view him as a more predictable and business-friendly candidate.

Weak macroeconomic data added further pressure on the pound. According to S&P Global, business activity in the UK contracted in June at the fastest pace since April 2025. The composite PMI fell below the 50-point mark, signalling a decline in economic activity. The services sector posted its weakest performance since early 2023.

Against this backdrop, the pound declined against the US dollar, while showing little change against the euro. Investors are assessing the prospects of the new political team and its ability to support the economy. Meanwhile, the UK economy remains close to stagnation.

Technical Analysis


On the H4 chart of GBP/USD, the market completed a downward wave to 1.3185. We expect a growth phase towards 1.3200. In practice, a wide consolidation range is forming below this level.

If the pair breaks out of the range to the upside, the potential will open for the wave to continue towards 1.3240. If the pair breaks out to the downside, the potential will open for a continuation of the decline towards 1.3140.

Technically, this scenario is confirmed by the MACD indicator. Its signal line is below the zero mark and is pointing firmly downwards.

On the H1 chart, GBP/USD has formed a compact consolidation range around 1.3222. At the moment, the range has expanded downwards to 1.3185. Further growth towards 1.3200 is expected, followed by a decline to 1.3140.

The Stochastic oscillator also supports this scenario. Its signal line is below 50 and is pointing firmly downwards towards 20.

Disclaimer

Any forecasts contained herein are based on the author’s particular opinion. This analysis may not be treated as trading advice. RoboForex bears no responsibility for trading results based on trading recommendations and reviews contained herein.

Global crude oil prices continued to decline. The AUD/USD exchange rate hit an 11‑week low

By JustMarkets 

On Monday, the US stock indices closed mixed amid a balance between sell‑offs in the technology sector and geopolitical optimism. By the end of the day, the Dow Jones Index (US30) rose by 0.29%. The S&P 500 Index (US500) fell by 0.37%. The Technology Index NASDAQ (US100) closed lower by 0.19%. The tech sector declined due to investor concerns over rising capital expenditures on artificial intelligence, which led to a drop in Alphabet shares by 5.2%, Palantir by 7%, Amazon by 4.4%, and Meta by 2.7%. Additional pressure on the market came from a 16.4% low plunge in SpaceX shares after the announcement of a debut $20 billion bond issuance, although the stock price still remains 40% above its recent June IPO level.

In May 2026, Canada’s annual inflation rate accelerated to 3.2% from April’s 2.8%, exceeding the analysts’ consensus expect of 3.0% and reaching its highest level since December 2023. The main driver of price growth was the energy sector: amid the Middle East conflict and the suspension of oil exports, gasoline prices surged by 33.2% year‑over‑year, while overall energy costs rose by 9.0%. Despite the jump in the headline figure, core inflationary pressure remains fully under the control of the Bank of Canada. The regulator’s key indicators – CPI‑trim and CPI‑median – remained stable at their target levels of 2.0% and 2.1%, respectively.

European indices mostly rose yesterday. By the end of the day, Germany’s DAX (DE40) increased by 0.62%, France’s CAC 40 (FR40) closed down by 0.25%, Spain’s IBEX 35 (ES35) gained 1.01%, and the UK’s FTSE 100 (UK100) ended the session higher by 0.72%. A powerful trigger for investor optimism was Iran’s statement about significant progress in negotiations with the United States and the signing of a memorandum of understanding on a permanent peace agreement, which sharply reduced the risk of oil supply disruptions and eased global inflation concerns. The banking sector became the locomotive of the market rally: shares of Santander, BBVA, and Nordea rose by about 2% due to falling Eurozone sovereign bond yields, which improved lending margin prospects. The technology sector saw another investment boom, with shares of chipmaker Infineon jumping 5%, supporting the broader trend of hyperscale companies attracting capital for artificial intelligence infrastructure.

On Monday, global crude oil prices (WTI) continued to fall, hitting their lowest level since early March – US WTI dropped below $74 per barrel. The main driver of the sell‑off was news that the US and Iran had agreed on a “roadmap” to reach a peace agreement within 60 days, supported by the US Treasury’s decision to temporarily allow the extraction, supply, and sale of Iranian oil. Expectations of a rapid increase in supply are confirmed by real‑time data: shipping volumes through the Strait of Hormuz have risen noticeably, and Iran has increased visible exports through this route to the highest level since the start of the conflict, while offering discounts on cargoes for China.

The US natural gas price (XNG) corrected downward to $3.23 per MMBtu after a local rally to two‑week highs. The main factor behind the decline was the continued comfortable surplus in the domestic market, supported by the fact that commercial gas inventories in underground storage remain 5.8% above the long‑term seasonal norm.

On Monday, palladium prices (XPD) held near $1,270 per ounce, trading close to their lowest levels since late September amid a decline in geopolitical risk premiums. Progress in US-Iran negotiations and preparations to lift the naval blockade in the Strait of Hormuz significantly eased investor fears about supply disruptions. An additional negative factor for palladium is the deterioration of its fundamental market conditions. After 14 years of persistent deficits, analysts now expect the platinum‑group metals market to shift into surplus in 2026 due to declining investment demand and reduced ETF activity. The situation is further aggravated by long‑term structural changes in China’s automotive sector, where the rapid growth of electric vehicle adoption is undermining palladium consumption, traditionally used in catalytic converters for internal combustion engines.

On Friday, Japan’s Nikkei 225 (JP225) rose by 1.55%, China’s FTSE China A50 closed higher by 2.04%, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng (HK50) fell by 0.65%, and Australia’s ASX 200 (AU200) closed lower by 0.14%.

The Australian dollar fell below the psychological level of 0.70, hitting an eleven‑week low. The main factor behind the weakening of the “Aussie” was the powerful global rally of the US dollar, fueled by hawkish signals from the Federal Reserve and expectations of further rate hikes in the United States. Investors have taken a wait‑and‑see approach ahead of the release of critically important national macroeconomic data that will determine the next steps of the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA). The May report is expected to show an acceleration in headline inflation to 4.4% (from 4.2%) and core inflation to 3.5% (from 3.4%), significantly exceeding the regulator’s 2-3% target range. Traders are also focused on labor market data: the consensus prediction expects a net job gain of 25,000 and a decline in unemployment to 4.4% after last month’s multi‑year high of 4.5%. Given that the RBA already raised the rate to 4.35% at its May meeting, strong macro data this week may force the regulator to proceed with new rounds of rate hikes in 2026, potentially triggering a sharp reversal and recovery in the AUD exchange rate.

S&P 500 (US500) 7,472.79 -27.79 (-0.37%)

Dow Jones (US30) 51,712.71 +148.01 (+0.29%)

DAX (DE40) 25,139.69 +153.87 (+0.62%)

FTSE 100 (UK100) 10,437.85 +74.58 (+0.72%)

USD Index 101.02 +0.17 (+0.17%)

News feed for: 2026.06.23

  • Australia Manufacturing PMI (m/m) at 02:00 (GMT+3) – AUD (MED)
  • Australia Services PMI (m/m) at 02:00 (GMT+3) – AUD (MED)
  • Japan Manufacturing PMI (m/m) at 03:30 (GMT+3) – JPY (MED)
  • Japan Services PMI (m/m) at 03:30 (GMT+3) – JPY (MED)
  • Singapore Inflation Rate (m/m) at 08:00 (GMT+3) – SGD (MED)
  • German Manufacturing PMI (m/m) at 10:30 (GMT+3) – EUR (MED)
  • German Services PMI (m/m) at 10:30 (GMT+3) – EUR (MED)
  • Eurozone Manufacturing PMI (m/m) at 11:00 (GMT+3) – EUR (MED)
  • Eurozone Services PMI (m/m) at 11:00 (GMT+3) – EUR (MED)
  • UK Manufacturing PMI (m/m) at 11:30 (GMT+3) – GBP (MED)
  • UK Services PMI (m/m) at 11:30 (GMT+3) – GBP (MED)
  • US Manufacturing PMI (m/m) at 16:45 (GMT+3) – USD (MED)
  • US Services PMI (m/m) at 16:45 (GMT+3) – USD (MED)

By JustMarkets

 

This article reflects a personal opinion and should not be interpreted as an investment advice, and/or offer, and/or a persistent request for carrying out financial transactions, and/or a guarantee, and/or a forecast of future events.