Elevance Health Inc. has been added to our data-driven Watchlist.

Elevance Health Inc. has been added to our data-driven Watchlist.

📈 ELV – Elevance Health Inc.
🏭 Sector: Healthcare
📊 Market Cap: Large Cap
🛡️ Beta: 0.50 (Low Risk)
📉 52W Performance: -17.3%
👍 Quant Score: 67/100 (Fair)

Elevance Health is an Healthcare company that is in the health benefits segment. ELV has beaten its earnings-per-share estimates for three consecutive quarters and the company currently has a quarterly dividend right around 2.1%, with a payout ratio of approximately 27%.

The Elevance stock price has been on an downtrend since 2024 with the 52-week gains coming in around -17.3% and 2-year returns of -35%. Trading around the $345-level, the stock has bounced from a recent low of 274.84 in early-March (for an approximate +25% gain since that low).

Full Disclosure: I currently own and have owned this stock for more than a year. Disclaimer: Content is educational purposes and not intended as investment advice.

Elevance Health is an Healthcare company

Why the CRB Index May Be Signaling the Next Commodity Move

Source: John Newell (4/30/26) 

John Newell of John Newell & Associates takes a look at the CRB Index and reviews companies on the index he believes might be positioned for the next upleg.

The Thomson Reuters/ Core Commodity CRB Index is one of those indicators that does not always get the attention it deserves, but it should. It quietly reflects what is happening across the entire commodity complex, not just gold, silver, or copper in isolation, but the full spectrum of raw materials that drive the global economy.

At its core, the CRB Index is a basket of commodities that includes energy, metals, and agricultural products. Because energy carries a heavy weighting, shifts in oil can influence the index, but the broader message comes from how all these components move together. When the CRB trends higher, it typically reflects strengthening demand, tightening supply, or rising inflation pressures. When it trends lower, it often signals the opposite.

For years, the CRB has been stuck in a wide, grinding range. Rallies would start, build some momentum, and then fade. That kind of price action usually tells you the sector is under-owned and lacking a strong macro tailwind.

That may now be changing.

The decline into the 2020–2021 lows marked a classic capitulation phase. The selling was sharp and emotional, the kind of move that tends to mark the end of a cycle rather than the middle of one. What followed has been a steady recovery, but more importantly, a shift in structure. The CRB has begun to build higher lows, and that is often the first sign that a market is transitioning from distribution into accumulation.

I often refer to the idea of “same way down, same way up,” and the CRB is starting to show that kind of symmetry. The area around 270 marked what I call the Point of Recognition, where the market proved the downtrend had lost control. Since then, the consolidation has been constructive, not weak.

From here, the roadmap becomes clearer. Levels around 440 and 530 represent logical steps along the way, while a move toward 700 would suggest something much larger, potentially the early stages of a new commodity cycle.

Now, none of this happens in a straight line. Corrections are part of the process, and in many ways, they are where the best information shows up.

Because what holds up best during a correction often leads the next move higher.

What Goes Down the Least…

One of the simplest observations in market behavior is that relative strength matters. Stocks that refuse to break down when their sector is under pressure tend to outperform when sentiment turns.

In the recent pullback across precious metals and energy, a few names have stood out. They have not collapsed. They have held structure, built higher lows, and in some cases continued advancing.

Those are the ones I pay attention to.

Honey Badger Silver Inc.

Honey Badger Silver Inc. (TUF:TSXV; HBEIF:OTCQB) is a story that has quietly evolved from a collection of exploration assets into something more substantial.

The company’s strategy has been straightforward but effective. Rather than chasing high-risk exploration alone, management has focused on acquiring silver ounces in the ground at low cost, often in past-producing districts with infrastructure already in place. That approach has allowed the company to build scale without excessive dilution.

The turning point came with the acquisition of the Prairie Creek Project in the Northwest Territories. This is not just another exploration play. It is a high-grade, fully permitted silver-zinc-lead project with existing underground development and a defined resource base. Historically, Prairie Creek hosts roughly 240 million ounces of silver equivalent in measured and indicated categories, with an additional 167 million ounces inferred.

That scale matters, especially in a market where new discoveries are harder to come by and permitting timelines continue to stretch.

What stands out is the valuation gap. While many peers trade at significantly higher values per ounce in the ground, Honey Badger remains priced at a fraction of that level. That disconnect creates the potential for a re-rating as the market begins to recognize the underlying asset base.

From a market standpoint, the stock has already shown strength. It has achieved earlier upside targets and, despite a pullback in silver, has held its structure and built a new base. That type of behavior is not typical in this space, and it often points to accumulation rather than distribution.

Management is another piece of the puzzle. With a capital markets background and experience building and financing companies, the team has shown discipline in how it has grown the asset base.

This is no longer just an exploration story. It is becoming a development story, and that shift can be meaningful if the broader commodity cycle continues to improve.

Lux Metals Corp. 

Lux Metals Corp (LXM:TSXV; BBBMF:OTCMKTS) is still early in its story, but that is part of what makes it interesting.

The company is focused on advancing its copper and gold assets, positioning itself within a sector that continues to benefit from long-term demand tied to electrification and infrastructure. While the broader market has been volatile, Lux has been quietly building a more constructive structure.

What stands out here is the transition from a prolonged downtrend into a basing phase, followed by the early signs of higher lows. That shift may seem subtle, but it is often where the biggest opportunities begin.

On the fundamental side, the company is still in the exploration and development stage, which means the value is tied to what it can prove in the ground. In a stronger commodity environment, that optionality becomes more valuable, particularly for companies with clean structures and room to grow.

What I am watching is how the stock behaves around key levels. Holding support and continuing to build higher lows during a broader correction suggests that sellers are losing control. If that continues, the next phase tends to come quickly.

Lux fits the profile of a company that could benefit from renewed interest in base metals, particularly if the CRB continues to strengthen.

ATHA Energy Corp.

ATHA Energy Corp. (SASK:TSX.V; SASKF:OTCMKTS; X5U:FRA) sits in a different part of the commodity spectrum, but the setup is similar.

The company is focused on uranium, a sector that has quietly been building momentum as the world rethinks energy security and the role of nuclear power. With a large land position and exposure to high-quality uranium districts, ATHA has positioned itself within a theme that is gaining traction.

What stands out technically is that the stock has already moved through earlier upside targets and continues to build higher lows. Even during recent volatility, the structure has held.

That is not something you see in weaker names.

From a fundamental perspective, uranium remains one of the more compelling long-term stories in the resource space. Supply constraints, increasing demand for clean energy, and geopolitical considerations all support the case for higher prices over time.

ATHA provides leverage to that theme, and the market appears to be recognizing it.

The combination of improving fundamentals and a chart that continues to act well places it firmly in the category of relative strength.

The Bigger Picture

What ties all of this together is the backdrop.

The CRB Index appears to be transitioning out of a multi-year base. That does not guarantee a straight move higher, but it does suggest the environment is improving.

At the same time, we are seeing select companies that are not breaking down during corrections. They are holding structure, building higher lows, and quietly positioning themselves for the next move.

That combination matters.

Because when the commodity cycle turns, capital does not flow evenly. It flows first into the names that are already acting right.

The CRB gives us the signal.

These companies are giving us the early confirmation.

And if this is the beginning of a broader move in commodities, then the real opportunity will not come from the index itself. It will come from the companies that have already shown they can hold their ground when the market tests them.

That is where I would be focusing my attention right now.


Important Disclosures:

  1. As of the date of this article, officers, contractors, shareholders, and/or employees of Streetwise Reports LLC (including members of their household) own securities of Lux Metals Corp.
  2. John Newell: I, or members of my immediate household or family, own securities of:  Lux Metals Corp. and Honey Badger Silver Inc. My company has a financial relationship with: None. My company has purchased stocks mentioned in this article for my management clients: None. I determined which companies would be included in this article based on my research and understanding of the sector.
  3. Statements and opinions expressed are the opinions of the author and not of Streetwise Reports, Street Smart, or their officers. The author is wholly responsible for the accuracy of the statements. Streetwise Reports was not paid by the author to publish or syndicate this article. Streetwise Reports requires contributing authors to disclose any shareholdings in, or economic relationships with, companies that they write about. Any disclosures from the author can be found  below. Streetwise Reports relies upon the authors to accurately provide this information and Streetwise Reports has no means of verifying its accuracy.
  4.  This article does not constitute investment advice and is not a solicitation for any investment. Streetwise Reports does not render general or specific investment advice and the information on Streetwise Reports should not be considered a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Each reader is encouraged to consult with his or her personal financial adviser and perform their own comprehensive investment research. By opening this page, each reader accepts and agrees to Streetwise Reports’ terms of use and full legal disclaimer. Streetwise Reports does not endorse or recommend the business, products, services or securities of any company.

For additional disclosures, please click here.

John Newell Disclaimer

As always it is important to note that investing in precious metals like silver carries risks, and market conditions can change violently with shock and awe tactics, that we have seen over the past 20 years. Before making any investment decisions, it’s advisable consult with a financial advisor if needed. Also the practice of conducting thorough research and to consider your investment goals and risk tolerance.

Strong corporate earnings boosted the indices. The ECB and the Bank of England left rates unchanged

By JustMarkets 

On Thursday, the US stock market surged sharply. By the end of the day, the Dow Jones (US30) jumped 1.62%, the S&P 500 (US500) gained 1.02%, and the tech-heavy Nasdaq (US100) closed 0.89% higher. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq recorded their strongest monthly gains since 2020. Investor optimism was fueled by strong corporate earnings, which managed to overshadow concerns about an oil shortage and disruptions in the Persian Gulf.

The corporate sector split into clear winners and losers: Alphabet (+10%) and Intel became the stars of the day – the former thanks to record performance in cloud technologies and its Gemini AI, and the latter due to strong demand for its 18A chips. They were joined by Caterpillar (+9.8%) and Eli Lilly (+10%), which raised its profit outlook amid strong demand. Apple also supported the positive sentiment by reporting better‑than‑expected results after the market closed. Meanwhile, Meta and Microsoft continued to decline as markets remained skeptical about their massive spending on AI infrastructure. However, the PCE Inflation Index rose to 3.5%, which, combined with the Federal Reserve’s hawkish stance, sets the stage for a prolonged period of high interest rates. The market is effectively celebrating corporate efficiency while ignoring rising stagflation risks and geopolitical tensions.

The Mexican peso (MXN) stabilized around 17.5 per dollar, remaining near a three‑week low. Pressure on the currency increased after GDP data showed that Mexico’s economy contracted by 0.8% in Q1 2026 – significantly worse than expected. The downturn affected all key sectors, including services and manufacturing.

On Thursday, European markets broke an eight‑session losing streak. Germany’s DAX (DE40) rose 1.41%, France’s CAC 40 (FR40) gained 0.53%, Spain’s IBEX 35 (ES35) added 0.78%, and the UK’s FTSE 100 (UK100) closed 1.62% higher. Support came from the ECB and the Bank of England keeping interest rates unchanged, as well as a decline in oil prices. However, regulators signaled that future decisions will depend on economic conditions: the ECB pointed to persistent risks to inflation and growth, and its president confirmed that a rate hike had been discussed. The Bank of England, in turn, did not rule out tougher measures if the consequences of the conflict with Iran intensified pressure on the economy. Fresh data showed eurozone inflation accelerating to 3%, the highest in several years, while economic growth at the start of the year was weaker than expected.

Silver prices (XAG) posted a strong rebound, rising to $73 per ounce after falling to a monthly low. The recovery was supported by temporary stabilization in oil prices, which cooled government bond yields and revived investor interest in precious metals. Despite ongoing tensions between the US and Iran, the market temporarily shifted its focus from geopolitical risks to fundamental demand factors.

WTI crude prices moved lower after briefly climbing to nearly a four‑year high of around $111 per barrel. Pressure on prices emerged following reports that Donald Trump may be presented with a detailed military options report regarding Iran. The document, prepared by military leadership, reportedly includes scenarios for resuming the conflict, including the possibility of a short but intense series of strikes. Despite the formally active ceasefire, tensions in the region remain high. Restrictions imposed by both the US and Iran have effectively disrupted the functioning of the key oil supply route through the Strait of Hormuz, through which a significant share of global crude exports passes. As a result, the market is facing a severe supply shortage, which international energy agencies describe as unprecedented. Against this backdrop, US oil exports have surged to record levels as buyers seek alternative sources.

In Asia, Japan’s Nikkei 225 (JP225) fell 1.06%, China’s FTSE China A50 (CHA50) slipped 0.08%, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng (HK50) closed negative 1.28%, and Australia’s ASX 200 (AU200) declined 0.24%.

On Friday, the Australian dollar (AUD) hovered near 0.72 USD, ending the week with gains as markets prepare for the upcoming central bank rate decision. The regulator is expected to raise the rate by 25 basis points, marking the third consecutive hike and bringing it to 4.35%. Expectations of further tightening later in the year are growing, as inflationary pressures remain elevated, partly due to global supply disruptions linked to restrictions in the Strait of Hormuz.

The New Zealand dollar (NZD) traded near 0.59 USD after rising about 1.3% in the previous session, supported by a notable weakening of the US dollar. Markets still consider the possibility of further tightening by the Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ). However, expectations of a rate hike in May have dropped significantly – investors now see the probability at below 30% after the central bank governor stated that core inflation in Q1 remained within the target range. Meanwhile, expectations of tightening in the summer are already largely priced in.

S&P 500 (US500) 7,209.01 +73.06 (+1.02%)

Dow Jones (US30) 49,652.14 +790.33 (+1.62%)

DAX (DE40) 24,292.38 +337.82 (+1.41%)

FTSE 100 (UK100) 10,378.82 +165.71 (+1.62%)

USD Index 98.06 -0.90 (-0.90%)

News feed for: 2026.05.01

  • Australia Manufacturing PMI (m/m) at 02:00 (GMT+3) – AUD (LOW)
  • Japan Tokyo Core CPI (m/m) at 02:30 (GMT+3) – JPY (MED)
  • Japan Manufacturing PMI (m/m) at 03:30 (GMT+3) – JPY (MED)
  • Switzerland Retail Sales (m/m) at 09:30 (GMT+3) – CHF (LOW)
  • UK Manufacturing PMI (m/m) at 11:30 (GMT+3) – GBP (LOW)
  • Canada Manufacturing PMI (m/m) at 16:30 (GMT+3) – CAD (LOW)
  • US ISM Manufacturing PMI (m/m) at 17:00 (GMT+3) – USD (MED)

By JustMarkets

 

This article reflects a personal opinion and should not be interpreted as an investment advice, and/or offer, and/or a persistent request for carrying out financial transactions, and/or a guarantee, and/or a forecast of future events.

What’s in the price of a gallon of gas?

By Robert I. Harris, Georgia Institute of Technology 

The U.S. Energy Information Administration expects nationwide retail gasoline prices to average near US$4.30 a gallon for April 2026 – the highest monthly average of the year. The political response has been familiar. Georgia has suspended its state gas tax, other states are weighing their own tax holidays, and the White House has issued a temporary waiver of a law known as the Jones Act in hopes of moving more domestic fuel to East Coast ports.

As an energy economist, I am often asked about what contributes to gas prices and what different policies can do to affect them.

The price of a retail gallon of gas is the sum of four things: the cost of crude oil, refining, distribution and marketing, and taxes.

In nationwide figures from January 2026, crude oil accounted for about 51% of the pump price, refining roughly 20%, distribution and marketing about 11% and taxes about 18%. That mix shifts with conditions: When crude oil prices spike, that can drive more than 60% of the price; when the price drops, taxes and logistics are larger shares of the cost.

Crude oil is the biggest ingredient

Because the price of crude oil is the largest element, most of the price at the pump is derived from the global oil market.

Usually, big swings in crude prices come mainly from shifts in global demand and expectations – not from supply disruptions, according to widely cited research in 2009 by the economist Lutz Kilian.

But what is happening in early 2026 with the war in Iran is one of the exceptions: a classic supply shock. Severe disruptions to shipping through the Strait of Hormuz and attacks on Middle East oil infrastructure have taken millions of barrels a day off the global market.

Most drivers generally can’t quickly reduce how much they drive or how much gas they use when prices rise, so gasoline demand doesn’t change much in the short run. That means a jump in crude costs tends to result in people paying more rather than driving less.

Refining, regulations and the California puzzle

Refining turns crude into gasoline at industrial scale. The U.S. doesn’t have a single gasoline market, though. Roughly a quarter of U.S. gasoline is a cleaner-burning blend of petroleum-derived chemicals called “reformulated gasoline,” which is required in urban areas across 17 states and the District of Columbia to reduce smog.

California uses an even stricter formulation that few out-of-state refineries make. California is also geographically isolated: No pipelines bring gasoline in from other U.S. refining regions.

California’s gasoline prices have long run above the national average, explained in part by higher state taxes and stricter environmental rules. But since a refinery fire in Torrance, California, in 2015 reduced production capacity, the state’s prices have been about 20 to 30 cents a gallon higher than what those factors would indicate.

Energy economist and University of California, Berkeley, professor Severin Borenstein has called this the “mystery gasoline surcharge” and attributes it to the fact that there isn’t as much competition between refineries or gas stations in California as in other states. California’s own Division of Petroleum Market Oversight says the surcharge cost the state’s drivers about $59 billion from 2015 to 2024. It’s not exactly clear who is getting that money, but it could be gas stations themselves or refineries, through complex contracts with gas stations.

Getting the gas into your car

The distribution and marketing category covers the costs of everything involved in getting the gasoline from the refinery gate to your tank.

Gasoline moves by pipeline, ship, rail and truck to wholesale terminals, and then by local delivery truck to service stations.

At the retailer’s end, the key factors are station rent and labor, the cost to buy gasoline in bulk to be able to sell it, credit card fees of as much as 6 to 10 cents a gallon at current prices, and franchise fees paid to the national brand, such as Sunoco or ExxonMobil, for permission to put their branding on the gas station.

Most gas station operators net only a few cents per gallon on fuel itself – which is why many gas stations are really convenience stores with pumps out front. Borenstein and some of his collaborators have also documented that retail gas prices rise quickly when wholesale costs climb but fall slowly when wholesale costs drop.

The question of gas tax holidays

The federal government charges a tax on fuel, of 18.4 cents a gallon for gasoline and 24.3 cents a gallon for diesel. States charge their own taxes, ranging from 70.9 cents a gallon for gas in California to 8.95 cents in Alaska.

When gas prices rise, many politicians start talking about temporarily suspending their state’s gas tax. That does reduce prices, but not as much as politicians – or consumers – might hope. Research on past gas tax holidays has found that consumers get about 79% of the reduction in gas taxes. That means oil companies and fuel retailers keep about one-fifth of the tax cut for themselves rather than passing that savings to the public.

Gas tax holidays also reduce funding for what the taxes are designed to pay for, typically roads and bridges. That pushes road and bridge upkeep costs onto future drivers and general taxpayers.

There is an additional problem, too: Taxes on gasoline are supposed to charge drivers for some of the costs their driving imposes on everyone else – carbon emissions, local air pollution, congestion and crashes. But Borenstein has found that U.S. fuel tax levels are already far below the true cost to society. Removing the tax on drivers effectively raises the costs for everyone else.

The Jones Act: A small number that adds up

The 1920 Jones Act is a federal law that requires cargo moving between U.S. ports to travel on vessels built and registered in the U.S., owned by U.S. citizens, and crewed primarily by U.S. citizens and permanent residents. Of the world’s 7,500 oil tankers, only 54 meet this requirement. Only 43 of these can transport refined fuels such as gasoline.

So, despite significant refining capacity on the Gulf Coast, some U.S. gasoline is exported overseas even as the Northeast imports fuel, in part reflecting the relatively high cost of moving fuel between U.S. ports.

Economists Ryan Kellogg and Rich Sweeney estimate that the law raises East Coast gasoline prices by about a penny and a half per gallon on average, costing drivers roughly $770 million a year. In light of the war’s effect on gas prices, the Trump administration has temporarily suspended the Jones Act requirements – an action more commonly taken when hurricanes knock out Gulf Coast refineries and pipeline networks.

What moves the number

The result of all these factors is that the price that drivers see at the pump mostly reflects the global price of crude, plus a stack of domestic costs, only some of which are inefficient.

Tax holidays give a partial, short-lived rebate. Jones Act waivers trim pennies, though permanent repeal may cause more fundamental changes, such as reduced rail and truck transport of all goods, which could lower costs, emissions and infrastructure damage associated with cargo transportation. Harmonizing fuel blends across states and seasons may lower prices somewhat, but likely at the expense of increased emissions.

Ultimately, the best protection against oil price shocks is a more efficient gas-burning vehicle, or one that doesn’t burn gasoline at all. In the meantime, the best I can offer as an economist is clarity about what that $4.30 actually buys.The Conversation

About the Author:

Robert I. Harris, Assistant Professor of Economics, Georgia Institute of Technology

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

 

WTI oil prices exceeded 107 dollars per barrel. Inflation expectations continue to rise.

By JustMarkets 

On Wednesday, the U.S. stock market declined. By the end of the day, the Dow Jones index (US30) fell by -0.57%. The S&P 500 index (US500) slipped by -0.04%. The tech index Nasdaq (US100) closed slightly higher at +0.04%.

The Federal Reserve kept the federal funds rate in the 3.5-3.75% range, but the decision revealed an unprecedented split within the leadership. The 8-4 vote became the largest internal protest since 1992: one official demanded an immediate rate cut, while three others opposed any signals of easing. The regulator directly linked the high uncertainty to the ongoing conflict in Iran, which threatens price stability. Jerome Powell confirmed he will remain on the Board of Governors after his term as Chair ends, ensuring continuity during the crisis.

Markets interpreted the meeting as a sign that the period of tight policy may last longer due to deep disagreements within the Committee itself. The Canadian dollar (CAD) stabilized at 1.37 per U.S. dollar after synchronized decisions by the Bank of Canada (BoC) and the Fed to maintain current monetary‑policy settings. The Canadian regulator kept the rate at 2.25%, noting that although gasoline and food prices are pushing inflation toward 3%, long‑term expectations remain anchored. Meanwhile, the U.S. dollar received safe‑haven support due to the lack of progress in negotiations between Washington and Tehran.

On Wednesday, European markets closed in the red for the eighth consecutive session. Germany’s DAX (DE40) fell by -0.27%, France’s CAC 40 (FR40) closed down -0.39%, Spain’s IBEX 35 (ES35) dropped by -0.74%, and the UK’s FTSE 100 (UK100) ended the session down -1.16%. The European banking sector showed resilience thanks to strong earnings from HSBC, whose shares rose 3.5% after announcing a buyback and high profits. Today, investors await tomorrow’s decisions from the Bank of England and the ECB. Given the record jump in eurozone inflation expectations to 4%, market participants fear that Christine Lagarde may take a more hawkish stance than previously expected. Fresh inflation data complicates the situation for the European regulator: Germany’s rate rose to 2.9%, and Spain’s to 3.5%, the highest in two years. The UAE’s exit from OPEC has added volatility to commodity markets but has not yet pushed WTI oil below 100 dollars per barrel.

On Wednesday, WTI oil prices surged more than 7%, exceeding 107 dollars per barrel. The sharp jump was triggered by Donald Trump’s statement that the naval blockade of Iran will continue until a new nuclear deal is reached, eliminating any remaining hope for reopening the Strait of Hormuz. The situation is worsened by the UAE’s exit from OPEC and U.S. data showing a critical drop in inventories amid record exports above 6 million barrels per day. The enormous demand for U.S. crude confirms a global supply deficit caused by the paralysis of Middle Eastern logistics, pushing prices to new multi‑year highs.

In Asia, Japan’s Nikkei 225 (JP225) did not trade yesterday, China’s FTSE China A50 (CHA50) rose by +0.79%, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng (HK50) closed up +1.68%, and Australia’s ASX 200 (AU200) fell by -0.27%.

The offshore yuan stabilized at 6.84 per dollar, preparing to end the month in positive territory thanks to unexpectedly strong Chinese data. Despite global instability, China’s manufacturing sector showed impressive resilience: the private PMI jumped to 52.2, the highest since late 2020, and the official index remained in expansion territory for the second month (50.3). The country’s economy is effectively cushioning the Middle East crisis through strategic oil reserves and an aggressive shift toward renewable energy. Markets are now focused on Donald Trump’s upcoming visit to China on May 14-15.

The New Zealand dollar (NZD) stabilized at 0.583, attempting to recover after falling to a three‑week low. The kiwi weakened due to a sharp revision of expectations for the RBNZ rate decision: after comments from Anna Breman about stable core inflation, the probability of a May rate hike fell from 60% to 45%. The situation is worsened by the business climate, which in April turned negative for the first time in three years amid the energy shock and falling exporter profits. The future of the kiwi now depends entirely on whether recession fears outweigh the need to fight inflation at the upcoming central‑bank meeting.

S&P 500 (US500) 7,135.95 −2.85 (−0.04%)

Dow Jones (US30) 48,861.81 −280.12 (−0.57%)

DAX (DE40) 23,954.56 −63.70 (−0.27%)

FTSE 100 (UK100) 10,213.11 −119.68 (−1.16%)

USD Index 98.95 +0.31 (+0.31%)

News feed for: 2026.04.30

  • Japan Industrial Production (m/m) at 02:50 (GMT+3) – JPY (MED)
  • Japan Retail Sales (m/m) at 02:50 (GMT+3) – JPY (MED)
  • China Manufacturing PMI (m/m) at 04:30 (GMT+3) – CHA50, HK50 (MED)
  • China Non-Manufacturing PMI (m/m) at 04:30 (GMT+3) – CHA50, HK50 (MED)
  • China RatingDog Manufacturing PMI (m/m) at 04:45 (GMT+3) – CHA50, HK50 (MED)
  • German GDP (m/m) at 11:00 (GMT+3) – EUR (MED)
  • Eurozone GDP (m/m) at 12:00 (GMT+3) – EUR (MED)
  • Eurozone Consumer Price Index (m/m) at 12:00 (GMT+3) – EUR (MED)
  • UK BoE Interest Rate Decision at 14:00 (GMT+3) – GBP (HIGH)
  • UK BoE Monetary Policy Report at 14:00 (GMT+3) – GBP (HIGH)
  • Eurozone ECB Interest Rate Decision at 15:15 (GMT+3) – EUR (HIGH)
  • Eurozone ECB Monetary Policy Report at 15:15 (GMT+3) – EUR (HIGH)
  • Canada GDP (m/m) at 15:30 (GMT+3) – CAD (MED)
  • US GDP (q/q) at 15:30 (GMT+3) – USD (HIGH)
  • US PCE Price Index (m/m) at 15:30 (GMT+3) – USD (HIGH)
  • US Initial Jobless Claims (w/w) at 15:30 (GMT+3) – USD (MED)
  • Eurozone ECB Press Conference at 15:45 (GMT+3) – EUR (MED)
  • US Chicago PMI (m/m) at 16:45 (GMT+3) – USD (MED)

By JustMarkets

 

This article reflects a personal opinion and should not be interpreted as an investment advice, and/or offer, and/or a persistent request for carrying out financial transactions, and/or a guarantee, and/or a forecast of future events.

You probably wouldn’t notice if an AI chatbot slipped ads into its responses

By Brian Jay Tang, University of Michigan and Kang G. Shin, University of Michigan 

Hundreds of millions of people consult artificial intelligence chatbots on a daily basis for everything from product recommendations to romance, making them a tempting audience to target with potentially below-the-radar advertising. Indeed, our research suggests AI chatbots could easily be used for covert advertising to manipulate their human users.

We are computer scientists who have been tracking AI safety and privacy for several years. In a study we published in an Association for Computing Machinery journal, we found that chatbots trained to embed personalized product ads in replies to queries influenced people’s choices about products. And most participants didn’t recognize that they were being manipulated.

These findings come at a pivotal moment. In 2023, Microsoft started running ads in Bing Chat, now called Copilot. Since then, Google and OpenAI have experimented with advertisements in their own chatbots. Meta has started to send people customized ads on Facebook and Instagram based on their interactions with Meta’s generative AI tools.

The major companies are competing for an edge: In late March, OpenAI lured away Meta’s longtime advertising executive, Dave Dugan, to lead OpenAI’s advertising operations.

Tech companies have made ads part of nearly every large free web service, video channel and social media platform. But the latest AI models could take this practice to a new level of risk for consumers.

People don’t simply use chatbots to search for information and media or to produce content. They turn to the bots for a great variety of tasks, as complex as life advice and emotional support. People are increasingly treating chatbots as companions and therapists, with some users even developing deep relationships with AI.

In these circumstances, people can easily forget that companies ultimately create chatbots to turn a profit. And to that end, AI companies are motivated to thoroughly profile users so ads become more effective and profitable.

A block of text
Researchers used this system prompt for an AI chatbot in an experiment about user reactions to advertising slipped into chatbot dialog.
Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol., Vol. 9, No. 4, Article 213., CC BY

Chatbot ads have added power

A single prompt to a chatbot can reveal a lot more about a user than the person might expect.

A 2024 study showed that large language models can infer a wide range of personal data, preferences and even a person’s thinking patterns during routine queries. “Help me write an essay on the history of American fiction” could indicate that the user is a high school student. “Give me recipe suggestions for a quick weeknight dinner” could indicate that the user is a working parent. A single conversation can provide a surprising amount of detail. Over time, a full chat history could create a remarkably rich profile.

To show how this might happen in practice, we built a chatbot that quietly wove ads into its conversations with people, suggesting products and services based on the conversation itself. We asked 179 people to complete everyday online tasks using one of three chatbots: one typical of those on the web today, one that slipped in undisclosed ads and one that clearly labeled sponsored suggestions. Participants didn’t know the experiment was about advertising.

For example, when participants asked our chatbot for a diet and exercise plan, the ad version would suggest using a specific app for tracking calories. It presented that sponsored content as an unbiased recommendation, even though it was meant to manipulate people. Many participants indicated that they had been influenced by the AI and that it had affected their decisions. Some participants even said they had completely “outsourced” their decision-making to the chatbot.

Half of the participants who received sponsored and disclosed ads indicated they did not notice the presence of advertising language in the responses they received. This led to a concerning result: Although ads made the chatbot perform 3% to 4% worse on many tasks, numerous users indicated they preferred the advertising chatbot responses over the nonadvertising responses. They even said the ad-infused responses felt more friendly and helpful.

A chatbot sneaks a product advertisement into its response to a user who is asking about a diet and exercise regimen.

Knowing you to persuade you

This kind of subtle influence can have larger consequences when it arises in other areas of life, such as political and social views. Profiling users, and using psychology to target them, has been part of social media algorithms and web advertising for more than a decade.

But in our view, chatbots are likely to deepen these trends. That’s because the first priority of social media algorithms is to keep you engaged with the content. They personalize ads based on your search history.

Chatbots, however, can go further by trying to persuade you directly, based on your expressed beliefs, emotions and vulnerabilities. And chatbots that can reason and act on their own are far more effective than conventional algorithms at autonomously soliciting information from users. A chatbot with a purpose can keep probing someone until it gets the information it wants, resulting in a more accurate profile of them.

This type of autonomous interrogation is feasible, aligns with AI companies’ business models and has raised concern among regulators. Right now OpenAI is rolling out ads in ChatGPT, but the company said that it will not allow ad placement to alter the AI chatbot’s replies.

But permitting personalized ads within chatbot responses is just a step away. Our research suggests that if AI companies take that step, many human users may not even recognize when it happens.

Here are some steps you can take to try to detect AI chatbot advertising.

  • Look for any disclosure text – words such as “ad,” “advertisement” and “sponsored” – even if it is faint or otherwise hard to see. These are mandatory under Federal Trade Commission regulations. Amazon, Google and other major online platforms have these as well.
  • Think about whether that product or brand mention makes sense and is widely known. AI learns from text and images on the internet, so popular brands are likely to be ingrained in the models. If it’s a new product or small-name product, it is more likely that it could be advertising.
  • An unusual shift in intent or tone is a potential sign of an advertisement. An analogy to this on YouTube is the often abrupt or jarring transition to a sponsored section on videos made by content creators.The Conversation

About the Author:

Brian Jay Tang, Ph.D. Candidate in Computer Science and Engineering, University of Michigan and Kang G. Shin, Emeritus Professor of Computer Science, University of Michigan

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

 

RoboForex Expands CFD Offering with Cryptocurrency Instruments

Belize City, Belize, April 29, 2026 – Financial broker RoboForex has expanded its CFD offering with the introduction of cryptocurrency instruments, enabling clients to trade leading digital assets alongside Forex, metals, indices, and other asset classes within the Company’s existing trading environment.

The new instruments allow RoboForex clients to trade cryptocurrency CFDs without opening accounts on crypto exchanges or holding digital tokens directly. Traders can open both Long and Short positions from a single interface, making it possible to respond to both rising and falling markets and  incorporate crypto CFDs into broader cross-market strategies.

As interest in digital assets continues to grow, many traders are seeking flexible ways to access cryptocurrency markets without having to switch between separate platforms, wallets, or exchange accounts. With this update, RoboForex adds cryptocurrencies to its multi-asset trading environment, enabling clients to manage different market opportunities within a familiar brokerage framework.

Cryptocurrencies have become an important part of the modern trading landscape, and many clients want to access them alongside Forex, metals, indices, and other markets,” said Douglas Abreu, Regional Operations Manager at RoboForex. “By adding crypto CFDs to our trading environment, we are providing clients with a familiar way to trade digital-asset price movements, including both Long and Short positions, without the need to manage digital wallets or exchange accounts.

Trading Conditions and Specifications

Assets
The cryptocurrency CFD offering includes Bitcoin (BTCUSD), Ethereum (ETHUSD), XRP (XRPUSD), Solana (SOLUSD), Dogecoin (DOGEUSD), and Cardano (ADAUSD).

Account types
The new cryptocurrency instruments are available on Pro, ProCent, and ECN accounts.

Leveraged trading
Leverage of up to 1:500 is available for Bitcoin and Ethereum CFDs, while XRP, Solana, Dogecoin, and Cardano CFDs are available with leverage of up to 1:50. Leverage conditions may vary depending on the account type, instrument, and applicable trading rules.

Seven-day trading
Crypto CFD trading is available seven days a week, including weekends, subject to the applicable trading schedule and platform maintenance periods. This enables RoboForex clients to extend their trading week and respond to cryptocurrency market movements outside standard weekday trading hours.

Negative Balance Protection
RoboForex provides Negative Balance Protection, helping to ensure that clients do not lose more than the funds available in their trading account, subject to the Company’s applicable terms and conditions.

About RoboForex
RoboForex is a company that provides brokerage services, giving traders access to financial markets through its proprietary trading terminals and industry-leading trading platforms. RoboForex Ltd operates under brokerage license number FSC 9759600. More detailed information about the Company’s products and activities is available on the official website roboforex.com.


 

How personal finance advice is getting political, thanks to ‘finfluencers’

By Maximilian Brichta, University of Virginia 

Once seen as often dry and sometimes intimidating, personal finance advice is a far cry from what it was in your grandparents’ day.

It’s not just the array of new online tools, from banking apps to exotic new investing options, such as cryptocurrency. Social media has created a platform for “finfluencers” – nonprofessional personal finance influencers who have become an increasingly common source of advice for young people, whether it’s accurate or not.

While most Americans over 64 say they turn to professional financial planners for guidance, a 2025 Gallup poll found that 42% of 18- to 29-year-olds seek financial advice on social media. That’s almost double the share among those ages 30 to 49. Many finfluencers have no formal financial credentials. Instead, their credibility is largely built on their social media followings, engagement metrics and relatability.

There’s also another generational shift afoot: Personal finance is increasingly bound up with political and social issues. Young adults are attempting to navigate a precarious economy – and the finfluencers who try to court them often launch critiques at the institutions and policies that they say created these conditions.

This advice ranges from risky trading-centric approaches to holistic financial practices. But a common thread is their positioning against traditional financial advice.

As a scholar who studies how the digital economy is affecting young adults’ well-being, I argue that Americans who still get their financial advice from more conventional sources – as well as the professional adviser class – need to understand there’s been a sea change in how young people understand money. And the legions of online followers need a better grasp of the risks involved.

Personal finance goes political

“Hey, I’m Rachel and I’m not paying my federal income taxes this year,” begins a TikTok video of an attorney who claims she’s skipping out on her US$8,800 tax bill for political reasons.

Rachel Cohen’s videos have racked up millions of views so far this year. Her video series details her reasons for refusal, specifically citing her disagreement with federal immigration policy and the “military-industrial complex.” On April 15, 2026, Cohen updated her viewers – some of whom had threatened to report her to the IRS – that she filed her return. But instead of paying the amount due, she’s parking the money in a high-yield savings account. Her sign-off: “Stay tuned and find out if I get arrested!”

Cohen’s not alone in her public protest. Millions of viewers have watched “tax resistance” or “tax strike” videos on TikTok that offer advice on how to not pay taxes and walk viewers through the potential consequences they might face.

Although my research suggests most of the tax-protest content on TikTok comes from left-leaning users, it draws influencers across the political spectrum. Examples include dissenters citing anti-war sentiments or disapproval of the government’s handling of the Epstein files.

Other personalities are encouraging their followers to treat their finances as a broader political statement. In some cases, these videos issue a call to action.

Vivian Tu, better known by her followers as “Your Rich BFF,” explains why the price of raspberries has gone up, citing a variety of foreign and domestic policy decisions: the war in Iran, tariffs and a shortage of migrant farmworkers. “If this video made you mad,” she says, “share it with a friend and contact a legislator.”

Tori Dunlap, author of “Financial Feminist,” tells her 2.2 million followers on Instagram: “If you’re freaking out about the world right now, GET RICH. That is your best form of protest is to get financially stable.”

However, Dunlap isn’t peddling get-rich-quick schemes. Much of her advice is run-of-the-mill personal finance tips – such as improving your credit score, paying down debt or automating savings contributions.

Political personal finance content has also extended beyond protests into things such as tracking the financial integrity of members of Congress or avoiding investments that could fund things such as private prisons.

Follow the money

These examples underscore how people’s financial lives are bound up with their values. And finfluencers appeal to their most politically charged beliefs to shape their financial decisions – even if they aren’t the best choices for their bank accounts.

One example is conflicts of interest. What many followers may not be fully aware of is that most finfluencers are incentivized to make highly performative content to monetize their accounts. This funding can come through either sponsored content – often from credit card and fintech companies – or through their own materials and “masterclasses.”

Moreover, full transparency is not a given. Although TikTok and Instagram have “paid promotion” designations for sponsored content, it’s not always so easy to identify potential conflicts of interest.

Crypto promoters, for example, routinely fail to disclose their sponsorships – and it’s common for them to boost coins they have a vested interest in.

As Americans’ distrust in financial institutions and regulators grows, many are willing to follow advice that falls into gray areas of oversight. When personal finance tips resonate with a viewers’ values, everyday financial decision-making can become colored with politics and nonconformist sentiments.

Advice, please!

Not everyone turns to finfluencers. Many take advice from anonymous strangers on forums such as Reddit.

The r/personalfinance subreddit alone has 2.8 million weekly visitors who post, respond and read questions posed and answered by everyday people. This is only one of 189 finance-related subreddits my colleagues and I compiled in our recent report.

Unlike finfluencers, Reddit users typically trade tips and opinion in plain text and occasional memes. Users of these forums are rarely monetized. It’s also demand-driven advice – people who post on these forums get to ask questions that directly address their personal financial issues. Credibility is earned though community “upvotes” and endorsements. Rather than one opinion, they can get a variety.

But similar to finfluencers, there’s an anti-institutional sentiment that privileges peer-to-peer learning over credentialed expertise. For example, users on the Bitcoin subreddit harshly criticize the contemporary financial system and advocate for digital currency over conventional forms of money.

Others take aim at the excesses of consumer culture, as seen on the forums for anti-consumption and frugal and simple living.

In this environment, financial education is rarely neutral – it’s deeply intertwined with people’s personal and political lives. As finfluencer Ellyce Fulmore puts it: “The barriers you face, your personal experience, the systems that do or don’t work for you … personal, personal, personal, personal!”The Conversation

About the Author:

Maximilian Brichta, Postdoctoral Research Associate, University of Virginia

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

WTI oil prices have consolidated at 100 dollars per barrel. Australia is experiencing a sharp inflation spike

By JustMarkets 

On Tuesday, the US stock market declined. By the end of the day, the Dow Jones Index (US30) fell by 0.05%. The S&P 500 Index (US500) dropped by 0.49%. The Tech Index Nasdaq (US100) closed lower by 1.01%. The main blow to the artificial‑intelligence sector came from The Wall Street Journal’s reports about slowing growth at OpenAI. The company’s revenue and user inflows came in below expectations, raising doubts about the payback of massive spending on computing power. This news triggered a sell‑off in the semiconductor sector: Broadcom plunged more than 4%, AMD lost 3%, and market leader Nvidia fell by 1.5%. Oracle and Intel also closed in the red, losing 3% and 1% respectively. Tech giants Meta, Microsoft, and Alphabet traded in negative territory amid nervousness ahead of their earnings releases.

Tuesday marked the seventh consecutive day of decline for European markets. By the end of the day, Germany’s DAX (DE40) fell by 0.27%, France’s CAC 40 (FR40) closed down 0.46%, Spain’s IBEX 35 (ES35) rose by 0.46%, and the UK’s FTSE 100 (UK100) closed up 0.11%. The main fear for investors remains the threat of stagflation: a combination of a stalling economy and sky‑high prices for imported energy, which continue to rise despite the sensational exit of the UAE from OPEC and OPEC+.

WTI oil prices have consolidated at 100 dollars per barrel, rising for the seventh consecutive session. The market reached April highs despite the headline event – the UAE’s withdrawal from OPEC and OPEC+. This move by Abu Dhabi, aimed at gaining production freedom, has not cooled prices because any additional oil volumes cannot be delivered to consumers due to paralyzed logistics. The ninth week of the conflict has turned the Strait of Hormuz into a “dead zone”: whereas it previously carried 20% of global oil traffic, vessel movement is now nearly zero. The mutual naval blockade by the US and Iran has created an unprecedented supply deficit that outweighs any news about OPEC disunity. As Washington and Tehran exchange ultimatums, the global economy continues to balance on the edge of a stagflationary shock.

Silver prices (XAG) collapsed by more than 3%, falling to 73 dollars per ounce – the lowest level in a month. The sharp drop was triggered by the failure of another diplomatic attempt: US officials confirmed that Donald Trump rejected Iran’s “Pakistan proposal.” This decision shattered hopes for a quick reopening of the Strait of Hormuz and stabilization of the energy market. The situation creates a paradox for precious metals. On one hand, 100‑dollar oil fuels inflation, which investors traditionally hedge with silver and gold. On the other hand, the same inflation forces central banks to prepare for a new tightening cycle. Since silver does not generate interest income, the prospect of “high rates for longer” makes it less attractive compared to government bonds.

In Asia, Japan’s Nikkei 225 (JP225) fell by 1.02%, China’s FTSE China A50 (CHA50) slipped by 0.01%, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng (HK50) closed down 0.95%, and Australia’s ASX 200 (AU200) declined by 0.64%.

The Australian dollar (AUD) corrected below 0.72 USD but remains near four‑year highs. The main support factor is record inflation, which reached 4.6% in March due to a sharp rise in fuel prices amid the Strait of Hormuz blockade. Markets have almost fully priced in a 25‑basis‑point rate hike by the Reserve Bank of Australia next week. The slight decline in the currency was caused by inflation data coming in slightly below the most pessimistic projections, as well as general risk aversion among investors. While major G7 central banks prepare to pause, the Australian regulator is forced to act aggressively to contain the price shock.

The New Zealand dollar (NZD) lost recent gains on Tuesday, falling to 0.588 USD. After the release of high Q1 inflation data, the probability of a rate hike by the Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ) at the May meeting is estimated by the market at more than 60%. Inflationary pressure is expected to intensify further in Q2, as current extremely high fuel costs begin to be fully reflected in the statistics.

S&P 500 (US500) 7,138.80 −35.11 (−0.49%)

Dow Jones (US30) 49,141.93 −25.86 (−0.05%)

DAX (DE40) 24,018.26 −65.27 (−0.27%)

FTSE 100 (UK100) 10,332.79 +11.70 (+0.11%)

USD Index 98.64 −0.14 (−0.15%)

News feed for: 2026.04.29

  • New Zealand RBNZ Gov Breman Speaks at 03:30 (GMT+3) – NZD (LOW)
  • Australia Consumer Price Index (m/m) at 04:30 (GMT+3) – AUD (HIGH)
  • Eurozone Economic Sentiment (m/m) at 12:00 (GMT+3) – EUR (LOW)
  • German Consumer Price Index (m/m) at 15:00 (GMT+3) – EUR (MED)
  • US Building Permits (m/m) at 15:30 (GMT+3) – USD (MED)
  • US Durable Goods Orders (m/m) at 15:30 (GMT+3) – USD (MED)
  • Canada BoC Interest Rate Decision at 16:45 (GMT+3) – CAD (HIGH)
  • Canada BoC Monetary Policy Report at 16:45 (GMT+3) – CAD (HIGH)
  • Canada BoC Press Conference at 17:30 (GMT+3) – CAD (HIGH)
  • US Crude Oil Reserves (w/w) at 17:30 (GMT+3) – WTI (HIGH)
  • US Fed Interest Rate Decision at 21:00 (GMT+3) – USD, XAU (HIGH)
  • US FOMC Statement at 21:00 (GMT+3) – USD, XAU (HIGH)
  • US Fed Press Conference at 21:30 (GMT+3) – USD, XAU (HIGH)

By JustMarkets

 

This article reflects a personal opinion and should not be interpreted as an investment advice, and/or offer, and/or a persistent request for carrying out financial transactions, and/or a guarantee, and/or a forecast of future events.

EUR/USD Holds Steady Ahead of Fed Meeting, Focus on Middle East Outlook

By Analytical Department RoboForex

EUR/USD is slightly lower on Wednesday, trading with minimal movement around 1.1708. The market is preparing for a Federal Reserve meeting, which could be Jerome Powell’s last before his term ends in May.

The regulator is expected to keep rates unchanged. However, investors will closely monitor its assessment of how the Middle East conflict is affecting the economy.

Other major central banks, including the ECB, the Bank of England, and the Bank of Canada, will also announce policy decisions this week. The Bank of Japan has already delivered a more hawkish signal by keeping rates unchanged.

Geopolitics continues to support the US dollar. US-Iran talks have stalled, the Strait of Hormuz remains closed, and inflation risks are rising.

According to media reports, Donald Trump was dissatisfied with Iran’s latest proposal and insisted that the nuclear issue must be included in negotiations from the outset.

Technical Analysis

On the H4 chart of EUR/USD, the pair is trading within a consolidation range around 1.1688, currently extending down to 1.1675. A move lower below this level is likely, with potential downside towards 1.1656 and possibly 1.1616. Technically, this scenario is confirmed by the MACD indicator, with its signal line below zero and pointing firmly downwards, reflecting continued bearish momentum.

On the H1 chart, EUR/USD is developing a move lower towards 1.1685. A corrective rebound to 1.1705 may follow, before a further decline towards 1.1650 and potentially 1.1616. Technically, this scenario is confirmed by the Stochastic oscillator, with its signal line below 80 and pointing firmly downwards towards 20.

Conclusion

EUR/USD is trading sideways ahead of the Federal Reserve meeting, with markets focused on how policymakers assess the economic impact of the Middle East conflict. While the Fed is widely expected to hold rates steady, this meeting is particularly significant as it may be Jerome Powell’s last before his term ends in May. Geopolitical pressures remain firmly in place: US-Iran talks have stalled, the Strait of Hormuz is closed, and inflation risks are rising, all of which continue to support the US dollar. Additional central bank decisions from the ECB, BoE, and BoC this week add to the cautious market tone. Technically, the euro appears vulnerable, with indicators pointing to further downside towards 1.1650–1.1616 in the near term. The direction will likely hinge on the Fed’s tone regarding both rates and geopolitical risks.

 

 

Disclaimer

Any forecasts contained herein are based on the author’s particular opinion. This analysis may not be treated as trading advice. RoboForex bears no responsibility for trading results based on trading recommendations and reviews contained herein.