Defense Products Firm To Be Cash Flow Positive This Year

Source: Darren Odell  (3/15/23)

This Australian company, which is experiencing sales momentum and attracting defense contractors’ attention, also is a takeout target, noted a Peloton Capital report.

DroneShield Ltd. (DRO:ASX; DRSHF:OTC) will be operating cash flow positive by year-end and “is an acquisition target,” purported Peloton Capital analyst Darren Odell in a March 9 research note.

With respect to achieving this cash goal, the Australian counterdrone products and solutions company has the following many factors working in its favor, Odell wrote.

1) DroneShield recently raised AU$29.4 million (AU$29.4M) through its stock purchase plan resulting from the AU$10.9M placement last month.

“The recent capital raise has provided DroneShield the ability to build inventory in anticipation of material contracts (and fulfill smaller contracts faster) that are expected to close, in the short to medium term,” wrote Odell.

2) DroneShield recently landed two contracts totaling AU$22M.

3) The company has a robust AU$200M sales pipeline consisting of multiple contracts, each worth more than AU$10. Peloton Capital expects DroneShield to close three large and several smaller deals this year.

“Our DroneShield valuation to AU$0.84 is based on increased confidence on the closure of larger contracts in 2023 and beyond,” wrote Odell.

Compared to Peloton’s AU$0.84 target price, DroneShield’s current share price is about AU$0.335. The company is a Buy.

4) Existing contracted customers in the Five Eyes countries will likely buy more products from DroneShield.

5) The U.S. Department of Defense recommends DroneShield.

6) The Russia-Ukraine war has heightened interest in products like those sold by DroneShield.

Attractive to Potential Buyers

With respect to DroneShield likely being acquired, Odell indicated the following factors support the belief it will happen.

1) One of DroneShield’s shareholders, owning about a 5% interest, is Epirus, a California-based unmanned aerial vehicle firm.

2) Private equity backs DroneShield.

3) The U.S. government recommends DroneShield.

4) Global defense contractors have taken note of DroneShield and its recent contracts.

 

Disclosures:
1) Doresa Banning wrote this article for Streetwise Reports LLC and provides services to Streetwise Reports as an independent contractor. She or members of her household own securities of the following companies mentioned in the article: None. She or members of her household are paid by the following companies mentioned in this article: None.

2) The following companies mentioned in this article are billboard sponsors of Streetwise Reports: None. Click here for important disclosures about sponsor fees. The information provided above is for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. As of the date of this article, an affiliate of Streetwise Reports has a consulting relationship with: DroneShield Ltd. Please click here for more information. The information provided above is for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation to buy or sell any security.

3) The article does not constitute investment advice. Each reader is encouraged to consult with his or her individual financial professional and any action a reader takes as a result of information presented here is his or her own responsibility. By opening this page, each reader accepts and agrees to Streetwise Reports’ terms of use and full legal disclaimer. This article is not a solicitation for investment. Streetwise Reports does not render general or specific investment advice and the information on Streetwise Reports should not be considered a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Streetwise Reports does not endorse or recommend the business, products, services or securities of any company mentioned on Streetwise Reports.

4) From time to time, Streetwise Reports LLC and its directors, officers, employees or members of their families, as well as persons interviewed for articles and interviews on the site, may have a long or short position in securities mentioned. Directors, officers, employees or members of their immediate families are prohibited from making purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market or otherwise from the time of the decision to publish an article until three business days after the publication of the article. The foregoing prohibition does not apply to articles that in substance only restate previously published company releases. As of the date of this article, officers and/or employees of Streetwise Reports LLC (including members of their household) own securities of DroneShield Ltd., a company mentioned in this article.

Disclosures For Peloton Capital, DroneShield Ltd., March 9, 2023

This report is provided by Peloton Capital Pty Ltd (Peloton) (ABN 22 149 540 018, AFSL 406040) and is general in nature. It is intended solely for the use of wholesale clients, within the meaning of the Australian Corporations Act 2001. This report must not be copied or reproduced, or distributed to any person, unless otherwise expressly agreed by Peloton. This document contains only general securities information or general financial product advice. The information contained in this report has been obtained from sources that were accurate at the time of issue, including the company’s ASX releases which have been relied upon for factual accuracy. The information has not been independently verified. Peloton does not warrant the accuracy or reliability of the information in this report. The report is current as of the date it has been published.

In preparing the report, Peloton did not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any specific recipient. The report is published only for informational purposes and is not intended to be personal financial product advice. This report is not a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any financial product. Peloton is not aware whether a recipient intends to rely on this report and is not aware of how it will be used by the recipient. Before acting on this general financial product advice, you should consider the appropriateness of the advice having regard to your personal situation, investment objectives or needs. Recipients should not regard the report as a substitute for the exercise of their own judgment.

Peloton may assign ratings as ‘speculative buy’, ‘buy’ and ‘sell’ to securities from time to time. Securities not assigned are deemed to be ‘neutral’. Being assigned a ‘speculative buy’, ‘buy’ or ‘sell’ is determined by a security total return potential, with the total return potential being aligned to the upside or downside differential between the current share price and the targeted price within a specified time horizon, if deemed appropriate. The views expressed in this report are those of the analyst/author named on the cover page. No part of the compensation of the analyst is directly related to inclusion of specific recommendations or views in this report. The analyst/author receives compensation partly based on Peloton revenues as well as performance measures such as accuracy and efficacy of both recommendations and research reports.

Peloton believes that the information contained in this document is correct and that any estimates, opinions, conclusions or recommendations are reasonably held or made at the time of its compilation in an honest and fair manner that is not compromised. However, no representation is made as to the accuracy, completeness or reliability of any estimates, opinions, conclusions or recommendations (which may change without notice) or other information contained in this report. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Peloton disclaims all liability and responsibility for any direct or indirect loss that may be suffered by any recipient through relying on anything contained in or omitted from this report. Peloton is under no obligation to update or keep current the information contained in this report and has no obligation to tell you when opinions or information in this report change.

Peloton does and seeks to do business with companies covered in research. As a result, investors should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest which it seeks to manage and disclose. Peloton and its directors, officers and employees or clients may have or had interests in the financial products referred to in this report and may make purchases or sales in those the financial products as principal or agent at any time and may affect transactions which may not be consistent with the opinions, conclusions or recommendations set out in this report. Peloton and its Associates may earn brokerage, fees or other benefits from financial products referred to in this report. Furthermore, Peloton may have or have had a relationship with or may provide or has provided, capital markets and/or other financial services to the relevant issuer or holder of those financial products.

Specific Disclosure: Peloton Capital raised $40.3m for DroneShield (DRO), announced March 2023, for which it earned fees.

Specific Disclosure: The analyst does hold securities in DRO.

Specific Disclosure: The report has been reviewed by DRO for factual accuracy.

Specific Disclosure: As at 9th March, Peloton Capital held c.1m DRO shares and 15m call options. This position may change at any time and without notice, including on the day that this report has been released. Peloton and its employees may from time-to-time own shares in DRO and trade them in ways different from those discussed in research. Peloton Capital may arrange the buying and selling securities on behalf of clients.

Murrey Math Lines 16.03.2023 (USDCHF, XAUUSD)

By RoboForex.com

USDCHF, “US Dollar vs Swiss Franc”

On H4, USDCHF pair has broken through the 200-day Moving Average and is now above it, which indicates a possible bullish trend. The RSI is approaching the overbought area. In this situation we should expect the price to test 5/8 (0.9338) and its further breakdown and increase to resistance level of 6/8 (0.9399). A break-down of the support at 4/8 (0.9277) will cancel this scenario. In this case the pair may fall to the 3/8 (0.9216).

USDCHF_H4
Risk Warning: the result of previous trading operations do not guarantee the same results in the future

On M15, the upper line of the VoltyChannel indicator has been broken. This event increases the probability of further price growth.

USDCHF_M15
Risk Warning: the result of previous trading operations do not guarantee the same results in the future

XAUUSD, “Gold vs US Dollar”

On H4, level 8/8 (1937.50) and broke away from it, which indicates a possible corrective decline in the price. Convergence is observed on the RSI, which is also a signal of drop in the price. As a result, the price is likely to break down the level of 6/8 (1906.25) and then fall to the support level 4/8 (1875.00). Overcoming resistance at 7/8 (1921.88) can cancel this scenario. If that happens, the price of gold might return to the 8/8 (1937.50).

XAUUSD_H4
Risk Warning: the result of previous trading operations do not guarantee the same results in the future

On M15, a break-down of the bottom line of the VoltyChannel indicator will be an additional signal for the downside movement of the price.

XAUUSD_M15

Article By RoboForex.com

Attention!
Forecasts presented in this section only reflect the author’s private opinion and should not be considered as guidance for trading. RoboForex LP bears no responsibility for trading results based on trading recommendations described in these analytical reviews.

European indices collapsed because of the problems with Credit Suisse. Oil falls amid intensifying banking crisis

By JustMarkets 

The released US producer price index data came in better than expected. Factory inflation decreased by 0.1% last month. Markets reacted with a drop in US Treasury bond yields. This indicates an impending change in the Fed’s rhetoric and the imminent end of the rate hike cycle. Federal funds futures show a 40% probability that the rate will remain unchanged at the March 22 meeting and a 60% probability that 25 bps will raise the rate to the 5.00% level. At the same time, it is expected that the maximum rates will be formed already at the next meeting, and by the end of 2023, the Fed will cut the rate to 3.75%. At the close of the stock market on Tuesday, the Dow Jones Index (US30) was down by 0.87%, and the S&P 500 Index (US500) fell by 0.70%. The NASDAQ Technology Index (US100) gained 0.05% yesterday.

Concerns about the deepening banking crisis persist. Shares of the struggling Swiss bank Credit Suisse fell to a new historic low. Credit Suisse’s biggest sponsor, the National Bank of Saudi Arabia, said it would not provide further financial assistance to the bank. The bank’s shares fell more than 26%. After European markets closed, Swiss regulators said that Credit Suisse was now meeting capital and liquidity requirements and that the Swiss National Bank would provide additional liquidity if needed. It became known today that Credit Suisse will exercise an option to borrow up to 50 billion Swiss francs ($53.68 billion) from the Swiss National Bank under two lines of credit to strengthen liquidity conditions. This situation has led to renewed sell-offs among European banks: French Societe Generale, Spanish Banco de Sabadell, and German Commerzbank fell sharply yesterday, pulling European indices into the abyss. German DAX (DE30) shed by 3.27%, French CAC 40 (FR40) fell by 3.58%, Spanish IBEX 35 (ES35) lost 4.37%, British FTSE 100 (UK100) closed yesterday down by 3.83%.

The consumer price index in France rose from 6.0% to 6.3% in annual terms. Inflationary pressures in Europe remain resilient and figures from Germany, Spain, and France clearly show it. Reuters reported yesterday that the European Central Bank intends to stick to its plans to raise its key rate by 50 basis points at its meeting today. ECB head Christine Lagarde’s remarks on the European central bank’s future plans are also worth a closer look. The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) forecast, taking into account the new UK budget, argues that the country will not enter a technical recession as originally thought. Instead, the UK economy is expected to contract by a modest 0.2%. The government has also pledged to halve inflation, and further OBR projections suggest that inflation will fall to 2.9% by the end of 2023.

Gold strengthened its position at $1900 on Wednesday, hitting a new six-week high. The banking crisis is forcing investors to hide money in precious metals. The technical on spot gold suggests it could go much higher. The fundamental picture now is also in favor of further growth in gold and silver.

Crude oil prices are down for the third straight day. The US WTI crude oil has fallen below $70 a barrel. The collapse of SVB, the problems of Credit Suisse, and the general financial instability contribute to the decline in quotes. While US authorities tried to ease fears of a broader contagion in the banking sector, the financial turmoil at Swiss bank Credit Suisse posed an additional threat to the global economy. At the same time, the IEA (International Energy Agency) reported an increase in oil inventories, pushing oil supply to an 18-month-high.

Asian markets were mostly up yesterday. Japan’s Nikkei 225 (JP225) gained 0.03%, China’s FTSE China A50 (CHA50) added 0.02%, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng (HK50) jumped by 1.52%, India’s NIFTY 50 (IND50) declined by 0.42% and Australia’s S&P/ASX 200 (AU200) was positive 0.86% by Wednesday.

Bank of Japan (BOJ) Governor Haruhiko Kuroda, who is retiring in April, said his ten-year monetary experiment, during which $3.7 trillion was injected into the economy, was “half successful.” In addition to lowering borrowing costs, Kuroda’s policies sought to sway public opinion and lead the public out of deflation with a powerful kick of monetary stimulus. Kuroda left a mixed legacy for the Bank of Japan: his massive stimulus was praised for pulling the economy out of deflation, but it reduced bank profits and distorted market functions through prolonged low rates. In 2016, Kuroda added a cap on long-term rates as part of a policy called yield curve control (YCC), which is still in effect. Many analysts expect the Bank of Japan to begin dismantling Kuroda’s stimulus policy under a new governor, Kazuo Ueda.

In Australia, the latest labor market data showed that the economy added 64,600 jobs last month, with the unemployment rate falling to a record 3.5%. The stronger-than-expected employment figures for February reinforced fears of further interest rate hikes by the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA).

S&P 500 (F) (US500) 3,891.93 −27.36 (−0.70%)

Dow Jones (US30)31,874.57 −280.83 (−0.87%)

DAX (DE40) 14,735.26 −497.57 (−3.27%)

FTSE 100 (UK100) 7,344.45 −292.66 (−3.83%)

USD Index 104.74 +1.14 (+1.10%)

Important events for today:
  • – Japan Trade Balance (m/m) at 01:50 (GMT+2);
  • – Australia Unemployment Rate (m/m) at 02:30 (GMT+2);
  • – Italian Consumer Price Index (m/m) at 11:00 (GMT+2);
  • – US Building Permits (m/m) at 14:30 (GMT+2);
  • – US Initial Jobless Claims (w/w) at 14:30 (GMT+2);
  • – US Philadelphia Fed Manufacturing Index (m/m) at 14:30 (GMT+2);
  • – Eurozone ECB Interest Rate Decision at 15:15 (GMT+2);
  • – Eurozone ECB Monetary Policy Statement at 15:15 (GMT+2);
  • – Eurozone ECB Press Conference at 15:45 (GMT+2);
  • – US Natural Gas Storage (w/w) at 16:30 (GMT+2).

By JustMarkets

 

This article reflects a personal opinion and should not be interpreted as an investment advice, and/or offer, and/or a persistent request for carrying out financial transactions, and/or a guarantee, and/or a forecast of future events.

Silicon Valley Bank: how interest rates helped trigger its collapse and what central bankers should do next

By Charles Read, University of Cambridge 

A former prime minister of Britain, Harold Wilson, is famous for remarking that a week is a long time in politics. But in the world of finance, it seems everything can change in just two days.

Only 48 hours elapsed between a statement from US-based Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) on March 8 that it was seeking to raise US$2.5 billion (£2 billion) to repair a hole in its balance sheet, and the announcement by US regulator the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation that the bank had collapsed.

At its peak in 2021, SVB was worth US$44 billion and managed over $200 billion in assets. America’s 16th largest deposit-taking institution just a week ago, it has now become the second biggest banking failure in US history. Only the collapse of Washington Mutual during the 2008 global financial crisis was larger.

Although SVB had been ailing for some time, the speed of its collapse took nearly all commentators – as well as its customers, mostly from the tech sector – by surprise. Tech firms around the world have their cash locked up in SVB deposits and were concerned about how they would pay their workers and their bills until government support was announced in the US, alongside HSBC’s deal to buy SVB’s UK arm.

And it looks like the run on SVB that heralded its collapse – by some metrics the fastest in history – is spreading to other institutions with similar characteristics. On March 12, two days after SVB’s collapse, regulators in New York closed Signature Bank, citing systemic risk.

But was what happened to SVB unpredictable, unpreventable and unavoidable? My research suggests not. My latest book about the history of financial crises, Calming the Storms: the Carry Trade, the Banking School and British Financial Crises Since 1825, was coincidentally launched the day before SVB failed and describes three situations in which a banking crisis may unfold.

Why SVB collapsed

One potential cause is when changes in interest rates between countries cause movements in capital flows to suddenly start or stop as investors chase better rates. This affects the availability of finance. This is what happened during the 2007 credit crunch that preceded the global financial crisis, but it wasn’t behind SVB’s collapse.

SVB’s failure does tie in with the other two situations I describe in my book.

The first is when interest rates rise rapidly. The cause may be a central bank reacting to a surge of inflation, a war or a tight labour market. Indeed, the Federal Reserve, alongside other central banks, has raised rates from a band of 0.25%-0.5% to 4.5%-4.75% over the past 12 months.

Higher rates tighten credit conditions. This makes it harder for financial institutions to finance themselves, while also damaging the value of their existing loans and assets.

The second is when short-term interest rates rise above long-term rates, as has happened in America over the past few months. During the pandemic, tech startups with spare cash from funding rounds in a world of easy money placed their deposits with SVB. With little demand for loans from this sector, SVB invested most of the money in long-term bonds – mostly mortgage-backed securities and US Treasuries.

In short, SVB was taking funds mainly on short-term deposit and tying them up in long-term investments. Then, over the past few months, short-term rates rose higher than the returns on longer-dated bonds (see chart below). This is because interest rates were soaring, thanks to the Fed’s rate hikes.

US interest rate changes

Line graph showing long- and short-term US interest rates rising over time, with short overtaking long in 2022.
Author provided from OECD data

With funding rounds harder to come by in a high-interest rate environment, tech firms began to withdraw and spend their deposits. At the same time, these higher rates resulted in falling prices for the bonds in which SVB had been investing. That squeezed SVB’s profit margins and put its balance sheet on shaky ground.

This situation was made worse because SVB needed to sell some of its longer-dated bonds at a loss to fund the deposits its customers were withdrawing from the bank. The news of the sales made depositors withdraw more funds, which had to be funded through more sales. A doom loop ensued.

The March 8 announcement that SVB was looking to raise US$2.5 billion to plug the hole in its balance sheet left by these asset fire sales triggered the bank run that finished it off.

Concerns about systemic risk

How worried should we be about the collapse of SVB? It is not a major player in the world’s financial system. It is also almost unique in modern banking in terms of its dependence on one sector for its client base and the vulnerability of its balance sheet to interest rate rises.

But even if SVB’s collapse does not trigger a wider financial crisis, it should serve as an important warning. Rapidly rising interest rates over the past year have made the global economy fragile.

The world’s central bankers are treading a narrowing path of trying to combat inflation without harming financial stability. Central bankers must manage interest rates more carefully, while regulators should discourage the finance sector from borrowing short to lend long without sufficient hedging of the risks this entails.

It is also important that central banks monitor the impact that interest rate differences and cross-border capital flows have on the credit that’s available to both banks and businesses. Even if the failures of SVB and Signature prove to be no more than “little local difficulties” (to quote another past UK prime minister, Harold Macmillan), the systemic risks that their collapse have highlighted can no longer be ignored.The Conversation

About the Author:

Charles Read, Fellow in Economics and History at Corpus Christi College, University of Cambridge

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

STOX50 Wobbles As Markets Eye ECB Amid Credit Suisse Drama

By ForexTime 

European shares traded mixed on Thursday as investors remained guarded towards the chaos revolving around Credit Suisse Group AG ahead of the European Central Bank (ECB) meeting.

Despite Credit Suisse receiving a US $54 billion lifeline from the Swiss National Bank, Switzerland’s central bank, some caution still lingered in the air.  The STOX50 Index which represents the 50 largest companies from 11 Eurozone countries struggled for direction this morning amid the lingering unease. However, the banking sector flashed green with Credit Suisse shares rallying over 20% following the emergency loan. With the ECB meeting just a few hours away and investors digesting the series of events concerning Credit Suisse, markets may switch into standby mode until another fundamental spark is brought into the picture.

Taking a brief look at the technical picture, the STOX50 is under pressure on the daily charts. The recent breakdown and daily close below the 4100 support level may open the door to further downside.

It’s all about the ECB meeting…

The European Central Bank is set to announce its rate decision this afternoon at 13:15 GMT.

According to a survey of economists by Bloomberg, most expect a 50-basis point hike. However, when factoring the negative developments concerning Credit Suisse – expectations may differ from reality.

The red flags appeared last week (March 9th) after Credit Suisse was forced to delay the publishing of its annual report thanks to a last-minute query from the US Securities and Exchange Commission. Yesterday (March 15th) the alarm bells rang after Ammar Al Khudairy, the chairman of Credit Suisse’s largest shareholder, Saudi National Bank, said that he would “absolutely not” make further investments in Credit Suisse. These comments sent shockwaves across financial markets and compounded recent fears following Silicon Valley Bank’s failure.

A battle between ECB hawks and doves

There is no doubt that the Credit Suisse drama will add more flavor to the pending ECB meeting.

Growing fears around the overall health of the financial system following the latest developments could empower ECB doves. This may result in the ECB opting for a smaller-than-expected rate hike to prevent further damaging the financial system. On the other hand, inflation still remains hot with core inflation hitting a record high of 5.6% year-on-year in January. This could serve as a strong enough argument for ECB hawks  – resulting in a 50-bp hike. Whatever the outcome, it will be a challenging meeting for the ECB and will certainly set the tone for the euro this month.

How does this impact the STOX50 Index?

Now, this is where things get interesting.

Given today’s environment, a larger-than-expected rate hike may fuel recession risks for the Eurozone while further damaging confidence about the health of the financial system. This would be bad news for European stock markets as the risk aversion, empowers equity bears – sending the STOX50 lower. It will be interesting to see whether the ECB mentions anything about the Credit Suisse situation.  If the central bank strikes a confident tone and suggests that the Credit Suisse situation is temporary, this could boost investor confidence – ultimately supporting the STOX50.

A deep dive into the technicals…

The STOX50 index on the D1 time frame was in a strong uptrend that made a last higher top at 4325.0 on 6 March. The bears then saw an opportunity and started coming into the market in more numbers.

After the top at 4325.0, the price broke through the 15 and 34 Simple Moving Averages (SMA) and the Momentum Oscillator changed course to the downside, both also confirming the increased bearish momentum in the market. A weekly support level was also breached and this became a new resistance level.

A possible critical support level formed when a lower bottom was recorded at 4070.6 on 13 March. Bulls tried to push the market up without success and the price formed a lower top on 14 March at 4190.4, touching the new weekly resistance level.

The very next day the bears broke through the critical support level at 4070.6 and three possible price targets were projected from there. Attaching the Fibonacci tool to the lower bottom at 4070.6, and dragging it to the lower top at 4190.4, the following targets were calculated. The first target can be estimated at 3996.6 (161.8%) which is located at the next weekly support level. The second price target may be calculated at 3876.8 (261.8%) and the price will have to break through yet another weekly support level to reach the third and final target which might be expected at 3682.9 (423.6%).

If the resistance level at 4190.4 is broken, the above scenario is canceled and must be re-assessed.

As long as the bears stay in control, the outlook for STOX50 on the D1 time frame will remain negative.


Forex-Time-LogoArticle by ForexTime

ForexTime Ltd (FXTM) is an award winning international online forex broker regulated by CySEC 185/12 www.forextime.com

Data Communications Co. To Buy Printing Firm

Source: Chris Thompson  (3/14/23)

The strategic merger between these two Canadian entities should enhance the acquirer’s “capabilities and growth potential,” noted an eResearch Corp. report. 

Data Communications Management Corp. (DCM:TSX; DCMDF:OTCQX) agreed to acquire the Canadian operations of R.R. Donnelley & Sons, called Moore Canada (RRD Canada), for CA$123 million (CA$123M), which should provide beneficial synergies, reported eResearch Corp. analyst Chris Thompson in a March 10 research note. The transaction should close in Q2/23.

“We believe the deal will be accretive to Data Communications Management’s financial profile as it accelerates [the company’s] revenue and EBITDA growth and diversifies its revenue base,” Thompson wrote. “It could help accelerate sales growth, lower some organizational costs, and enhance operational efficiency, which could lead to an improved overall financial performance.”

In other news, the analyst reported Data Communications reported strong preliminary full-year 2022 (FY22) financial results, noteworthy for higher-than-expected revenue as well as year-over-year (YOY) increases in revenue, gross profits, and EBITDA.

Boosts to Target Price

Thompson highlighted that the merger and strong FY22 are “positive for the company valuation, according to our model.” Incorporating last year’s revenue increases eResearch’s target price on Data Communications to CA$4.59 per share, whereas accounting only for the acquisition takes it to CA$5.92 per share. Combining both raises it to CA$6.02 per share.

Data Communications is rated Buy.

The private equity investment firm, however, plans to keep its target price as is, now CA$4.50 per share, until the merger closes or final FY22 financial results are released.

Compared to the current CA$4.50 per share target price, this provider of marketing and business communication solutions is currently trading at about CA$2.06 per share, noted Thompson. This price difference implies significant potential gains for investors. Data Communications is rated Buy.

Impacts of the Deal

Thompson highlighted the acquisition should boost Data Communications’ capabilities and growth potential given RRD Canada’s “highly complementary” operating model and the expectation RRD Canada will bring online more products, services, and technological abilities.

RRD Canada provides print and print-related services to thousands of Canadian customers through 10 locations and with 1,000 employees. Last year, RRD generated about CA$250M in revenue. With the merger, Data Communications will be able to offer RRD’s services and solutions to its existing customers and take advantage of cross-selling opportunities.

According to the terms of the share purchase agreement, Data Communications will acquire three RRD Canada-owned sites at an implied value of about CA$30M. After closing, Data Communications plans to pursue a sale and leaseback agreement for each of these locations.

The acquisition would take Data Communications’ 16 locations to 21 and its number of enterprise clients to 400-plus from 250. These additional clients would add scale, for instance, to Data Communications’ marketing workflow technology platform, DCMFlex, and its digital asset management platform, ASMBL.

Snapshot of 2022 Finances

For FY22, Data Communications reported preliminary revenue of between CA$270M and CA$274M. This is higher than eResearch’s estimate of $265.3M and reflects a 15–16.5% increase over FY21 revenue.

Similarly, gross profit last year was between 30.5% and 31%, up 20–21% from that in FY21. FY22 EBITDA was between CA$35.5M and CA$36.5M, a 41–45% YOY increase.

Total debt, net of cash, down dropped about 35% from 2021’s amount. Data Communications plans on paying for the acquisition of RRD entirely through committed credit facilities noted Thompson.

Data Communications is scheduled to release full financial FY22 results on March 21, 2023, and hold an investor call and webcast the next day.

Sign up for our FREE newsletter

Disclosures:

1) Doresa Banning wrote this article for Streetwise Reports LLC as an independent contractor. They or members of their household own securities of the following companies mentioned in the article: None. They or members of their household are paid by the following companies mentioned in this article: None.

2) The following companies mentioned in this article are billboard sponsors of Streetwise Reports: Data Communications Management Corp. Click here for important disclosures about sponsor fees. The information provided above is for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation to buy or sell any security.

3) Statements and opinions expressed are the opinions of the author and not of Streetwise Reports or its officers. The author is wholly responsible for the validity of the statements. The author was not paid by Streetwise Reports for this article. Streetwise Reports was not paid by the author to publish or syndicate this article. Streetwise Reports requires contributing authors to disclose any shareholdings in or economic relationships with, companies that they write about. Streetwise Reports relies upon the authors to accurately provide this information and Streetwise Reports has no means of verifying its accuracy.

4) This article does not constitute investment advice. Each reader is encouraged to consult with his or her individual financial professional and any action a reader takes as a result of information presented here is his or her own responsibility. By opening this page, each reader accepts and agrees to Streetwise Reports’ terms of use and full legal disclaimer. This article is not a solicitation for investment. Streetwise Reports does not render general or specific investment advice and the information on Streetwise Reports should not be considered a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Streetwise Reports does not endorse or recommend the business, products, services or securities of any company mentioned on Streetwise Reports.

5) From time to time, Streetwise Reports LLC and its directors, officers, employees or members of their families, as well as persons interviewed for articles and interviews on the site, may have a long or short position in securities mentioned. Directors, officers, employees or members of their immediate families are prohibited from making purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market or otherwise from the time of the decision to publish an article until three business days after the publication of the article. The foregoing prohibition does not apply to articles that in substance only restate previously published company releases.

Disclosures for eResearch, Data Communications Management Corp., March 10, 2023

ANALYST ACCREDITATION

eResearch Analyst on this Report: Chris Thompson CFA, MBA, P.Eng. Analyst Affirmation: I, Chris Thompson, hereby state that, at the time of issuance of this research report, I do not own common shares, share options, or share warrants of DATA Communications Management Corp. (TSX:DCM).

eRESEARCH DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

eResearch is engaged solely in the provision of equity research to the investment community. eResearch provides published research and analysis to its Subscribers on its website (www.eresearch.com), and to the general investing public through its extensive electronic distribution network and newswire agencies. eResearch makes all reasonable efforts to distribute research material simultaneously to all of its Subscribers. eResearch does not manage money or trade with the general public, provides full disclosure of all fee arrangements, and adheres to the strict application of its Best Practices Guidelines. eResearch accepts fees from the companies it researches (the “Covered Companies”), and from financial institutions or other third parties. The purpose of this policy is to defray the cost of researching small and medium-capitalization stocks which otherwise receive little or no research coverage.

DATA Communications Management Corp. paid eResearch a fee to have it conduct research and publish reports on the Company for one year.

To ensure complete independence and editorial control over its research, eResearch follows certain business practices and compliance procedures. For instance, fees from Covered Companies are due and payable before research starts. Management of the Covered Companies is sent copies, in draft form without a Recommendation or a Target Price, of the Initiating Report and the Update Report before publication to ensure our facts are correct, that we have not misrepresented anything, and have not included any non-public, confidential information. At no time is management entitled to comment on issues of judgment, including Analyst opinions, viewpoints, or recommendations. All research reports must be approved, before publication, by eResearch’s Director of Research, who is a Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA).

All Analysts are required to sign a contract with eResearch before engagement and agree to adhere at all times to the CFA Institute Code of Ethics and Standards of Professional Conduct. eResearch Analysts are compensated on a per-report, per-company basis and not based on his/her recommendations. Analysts are not allowed to accept any fees or other considerations from the companies they cover for eResearch. Officers, analysts, and directors of eResearch are allowed to trade in shares, warrants, convertible securities, or options of any of the Covered Companies only under strict, specified conditions, which restrict trading 30 days before and after a Research Report is published.

How to use free satellite data to monitor natural disasters and environmental changes

By Qiusheng Wu, University of Tennessee 

If you want to track changes in the Amazon rainforest, see the full expanse of a hurricane or figure out where people need help after a disaster, it’s much easier to do with the view from a satellite orbiting a few hundred miles above Earth.

Over 8,000 satellites are orbiting Earth today, capturing images like this, of the Louisiana coast.
NASA Earth Observatory

Traditionally, access to satellite data has been limited to researchers and professionals with expertise in remote sensing and image processing. However, the increasing availability of open-access data from government satellites such as Landsat and Sentinel, and free cloud-computing resources such as Amazon Web Services, Google Earth Engine and Microsoft Planetary Computer, have made it possible for just about anyone to gain insight into environmental changes underway.

I work with geospatial big data as a professor. Here’s a quick tour of where you can find satellite images, plus some free, fairly simple tools that anyone can use to create time-lapse animations from satellite images.

For example, state and urban planners – or people considering a new home – can watch over time how rivers have moved, construction crept into wildland areas or a coastline eroded.

A squiggly river moves surprisingly quickly over time.
Landsat time-lapse animations show the river dynamics in Pucallpa, Peru.
Qiusheng Wu, NASA Landsat
Animation shows the shoreline shrinking.
A Landsat time-lapse shows the shoreline retreat in the Parc Natural del Delta, Spain.
Qiusheng Wu, NASA Landsat

Environmental groups can monitor deforestation, the effects of climate change on ecosystems, and how other human activities like irrigation are shrinking bodies of water like Central Asia’s Aral Sea. And disaster managers, aid groups, scientists and anyone interested can monitor natural disasters such as volcanic eruptions and wildfires.

The lake, created by damming the river, has shrunk over time.
GOES images show the decline of the crucial Colorado River reservoir Lake Mead since the 1980s and the growth of neighboring Las Vegas.
Qiusheng Wu, NOAA GOES
A volcanic eruption bursts into view.
A GOES satellite time-lapse shows the Hunga Tonga volcanic eruption on Jan. 15, 2022.
Qiusheng Wu, NOAA GOES

Putting Landsat and Sentinel to work

There are over 8,000 satellites orbiting the Earth today. You can see a live map of them at keeptrack.space.

Some transmit and receive radio signals for communications. Others provide global positioning system (GPS) services for navigation. The ones we’re interested in are Earth observation satellites, which collect images of the Earth, day and night.

Landsat: The longest-running Earth satellite mission, Landsat, has been collecting imagery of the Earth since 1972. The latest satellite in the series, Landsat 9, was launched by NASA in September 2021.

In general, Landsat satellite data has a spatial resolution of about 100 feet (about 30 meters). If you think of pixels on a zoomed-in photo, each pixel would be 100 feet by 100 feet. Landsat has a temporal resolution of 16 days, meaning the same location on Earth is imaged approximately once every 16 days. With both Landsat 8 and 9 in orbit, we can get a global coverage of the Earth once every eight days. That makes comparisons easier.

Landsat data has been freely available to the public since 2008. During the Pakistan flood of 2022, scientists used Landsat data and free cloud-computing resources to determine the flood extent and estimated the total flooded area.

Images show how the flood covered about a third of Pakistan.
Landsat satellite images showing a side-by-side comparison of southern Pakistan in August 2021 (one year before the floods) and August 2022 (right)
Qiusheng Wu, NASA Landsat

Sentinel: Sentinel Earth observation satellites were launched by the European Space Agency (ESA) as part of the Copernicus program. Sentinel-2 satellites have been collecting optical imagery of the Earth since 2015 at a spatial resolution of 10 meters (33 feet) and a temporal resolution of 10 days.

GOES: The images you’ll see most often in U.S. weather forecasting come from NOAA’s Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites, or GOES. They orbit above the equator at the same speed Earth rotates, so they can provide continuous monitoring of Earth’s atmosphere and surface, giving detailed information on weather, climate, and other environmental conditions. GOES-16 and GOES-17 can image the Earth at a spatial resolution of about 1.2 miles (2 kilometers) and a temporal resolution of five to 10 minutes.

Animation showing swirling clouds off the coast and the long river of moisture headed for California.
A GOES satellite shows an atmospheric river arriving on the West Coast in 2021.
Qiusheng Wu, GOES

How to create your own visualizations

In the past, creating a Landsat time-lapse animation of a specific area required extensive data processing skills and several hours or even days of work. However, nowadays, free and user-friendly programs are available to enable anyone to create animations with just a few clicks in an internet browser.

For instance, I created an interactive web app for my students that anyone can use to generate time-lapse animations quickly. The user zooms in on the map to find an area of interest, then draws a rectangle around the area to save it as a GeoJSON file – a file that contains the geographic coordinates of the chosen region. Then the user uploads the GeoJSON file to the web app, chooses the satellite to view from and the dates and submits it. It takes the app about 60 seconds to then produce a time-lapse animation.

How to create satellite time-lapse animations.

There are several other useful tools for easily creating satellite animations. Others to try include Snazzy-EE-TS-GIF, an Earth Engine App for creating Landsat animations, and Planetary Computer Explorer, an explorer for searching and visualizing satellite imagery interactively.The Conversation

About the Author:

Qiusheng Wu, Assistant Professor of Geography and Sustainability, University of Tennessee

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Why SVB and Signature Bank failed so fast – and the US banking crisis isn’t over yet

By Vidhura S. Tennekoon, Indiana University 

Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank failed with enormous speed – so quickly that they could be textbook cases of classic bank runs, in which too many depositors withdraw their funds from a bank at the same time. The failures at SVB and Signature were two of the three biggest in U.S. banking history, following the collapse of Washington Mutual in 2008.

How could this happen when the banking industry has been sitting on record levels of excess reserves – or the amount of cash held beyond what regulators require?

While the most common type of risk faced by a commercial bank is a jump in loan defaults – known as credit risk – that’s not what is happening here. As an economist who has expertise in banking, I believe it boils down to two other big risks every lender faces: interest rate risk and liquidity risk.

Interest rate risk

A bank faces interest rate risk when the rates increase rapidly within a shorter period.

That’s exactly what has happened in the U.S. since March 2022. The Federal Reserve has been aggressively raising rates – 4.5 percentage points so far – in a bid to tame soaring inflation. As a result, the yield on debt has jumped at a commensurate rate.

The yield on one-year U.S. government Treasury notes hit a 17-year high of 5.25% in March 2023, up from less than 0.5% at the beginning of 2022. Yields on 30-year Treasurys have climbed almost 2 percentage points.

As yields on a security go up, its price goes down. And so such a rapid rise in rates in so short a time caused the market value of previously issued debt – whether corporate bonds or government Treasury bills – to plunge, especially for longer-dated debt.

For example, a 2 percentage point gain in a 30-year bond’s yield can cause its market value to plunge by around 32%.

SVB, as Silicon Valley Bank is known, had a massive share of its assets – 55% – invested in fixed-income securities, such as U.S. government bonds.

Of course, interest rate risk leading to a drop in market value of a security is not a huge problem as long as the owner can hold onto it until maturity, at which point it can collect its original face value without realizing any loss. The unrealized loss stays hidden on the bank’s balance sheet and disappears over time.

But if the owner has to sell the security before its maturity at a time when the market value is lower than face value, the unrealized loss becomes an actual loss.

That’s exactly what SVB had to do earlier this year as its customers, dealing with their own cash shortfalls, began withdrawing their deposits – while even higher interest rates were expected.

This bring us to liquidity risk.

Liquidity risk

Liquidity risk is the risk that a bank won’t be able to meet its obligations when they come due without incurring losses.

For example, if you spend US$150,000 of your savings to buy a house and down the road you need some or all of that money to deal with another emergency, you’re experiencing a consequence of liquidity risk. A large chunk of your money is now tied up in the house, which is not easily exchangeable for cash.

Customers of SVB were withdrawing their deposits beyond what it could pay using its cash reserves, and so to help meet its obligations the bank decided to sell $21 billion of its securities portfolio at a loss of $1.8 billion. The drain on equity capital led the lender to try to raise over $2 billion in new capital.

The call to raise equity sent shockwaves to SVB’s customers, who were losing confidence in the bank and rushed to withdraw cash. A bank run like this can cause even a healthy bank to go bankrupt in a matter days, especially now in the digital age.

In part this is because many of SVB’s customers had deposits well above the $250,000 insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. – and so they knew their money might not be safe if the bank were to fail. Roughly 88% of deposits at SVB were uninsured.

Signature faced a similar problem, as SVB’s collapse prompted many of its customers to withdraw their deposits out of a similar concern over liquidity risk. About 90% of its deposits were uninsured.

Systemic risk?

All banks face interest rate risk today on some of their holdings because of the Fed’s rate-hiking campaign.

This has resulted in $620 billion in unrealized losses on bank balance sheets as of December 2022.

But most banks are unlikely to have significant liquidity risk.

While SVB and Signature were complying with regulatory requirements, the composition of their assets was not in line with industry averages.

Signature had just over 5% of its assets in cash and SVB had 7%, compared with the industry average of 13%. In addition, SVB’s 55% of assets in fixed-income securities compares with the industry average of 24%.

The U.S. government’s decision to backstop all deposits of SVB and Signature regardless of their size should make it less likely that banks with less cash and more securities on their books will face a liquidity shortfall because of massive withdrawals driven by sudden panic.

However, with over $1 trillion of bank deposits currently uninsured, I believe that the banking crisis is far from over.The Conversation

About the Author:

Vidhura S. Tennekoon, Assistant Professor of Economics, Indiana University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

 

Federal Reserve’s dilemma as mistakes from past come back to haunt

By George Prior

The Federal Reserve faces its biggest dilemma yet as mistakes from the past come back to haunt, warns the CEO of one of the world’s largest independent financial advisory, asset management and fintech organizations.

The stark warning from deVere Group’s Nigel Green comes as US CPI data published yesterday reveals that core inflation rose in February in the world’s largest economy.

He says: “The headline CPI last month had risen by 6% from last year, down from the 6.4% pace recorded in January, as expected.

“However, core inflation which takes out volatile elements such as food and energy prices, jumped 0.5% on the month, and 5.5% on the year.

“This presents the biggest dilemma yet for the Fed.”

Nigel Green continues: “The central bank has the unenviable task of trying to cool high inflation – which remains stubbornly high and with core inflation on the rise again – despite one of the most aggressive rate hike programs in the world, as well as maintaining financial stability, in the face of the second and third biggest bank failures in US history in recent days.

“It’s time for an honest conversation. The Fed has already spectacularly failed to control inflation so far.

“Now they need to roll higher rates to cool inflation, but these pumped-up rates could trigger yet more problems for the critical banking sector.

“Investors are increasingly concerned that the Fed’s overtightening now – when monetary policy time lags are notoriously long – could steer the US economy into a recession.”

Time lag in monetary policies is very high. Economists estimate interest rate changes take up to 18 months to have the full effect. This means monetary policymakers need to try and predict the state of the economy 18 months ahead.

“We expect the central bank will remain hawkish. They will argue there’s not enough evidence to revise the hikes.”

The deVere CEO says “mistakes from the past come back to haunt” the Federal Reserve.

“The Fed didn’t act quickly enough to tame inflation. They resisted raising interest rates from near-zero levels for most of 2021, even as prices began shooting up due to pandemic-related supply chain snarls, Covid outbreaks and a persistent labour shortage, amongst other issues,” he notes. “This all leads to sky-high inflation – and especially wage inflation.”

It would seem that the Fed hasn’t learned the lessons from the 1980s.

“During much of the 1970s, the US central bank refused to roll-out rate hikes, probably due to political pressure from leaders unwilling to allow higher unemployment on their watch.

“Of course, this made workers keep asking for ever higher salaries, which forced businesses to keep increasing prices to compensate, and which led to the infamous 1980’s wage-price spiral and the recession.”

The deVere chief also flags not bringing quantitative easing (QE) to an end sooner as another potential mistake made by the Fed.

In 2022, the Fed brought an end to its QE policy, involving purchases of Treasury and mortgage-backed securities. QE was aimed at providing more liquidity to capital markets.

“Could QE have helped spur inflation as the increased money supply resulted in too much money chasing too few goods and services at that time?” he asks.

Nigel Green concludes: “Mistakes of the past are coming back to haunt the Fed as they face their toughest decision yet at their next meeting on March 22.”

About:

deVere Group is one of the world’s largest independent advisors of specialist global financial solutions to international, local mass affluent, and high-net-worth clients.  It has a network of offices across the world, over 80,000 clients and $12bn under advisement.

Japanese Candlesticks Analysis 15.03.2023 (EURUSD, USDJPY, EURGBP)

By RoboForex.com

EURUSD, “Euro vs US Dollar”

On H4, EURUSD has formed a reversal pattern of a Long-Legged Doji near the resistance level. At this stage, the signal from the reversal candlestick pattern may trigger a downward wave. The target for the pullback will be 1.0710. However, one should not exclude the variant with price growth to the level of 1.0790 and continuation of the upward trend without a support test.

EURUSD
Risk Warning: the result of previous trading operations do not guarantee the same results in the future

USDJPY, “US Dollar vs Japanese Yen”

On H4, USDJPY has formed a Inverted Hammer pattern. At this stage, the signal from the reversal candlestick pattern is being worked out in an ascending wave. The target for growth may be the level of 135.90. However, we should not exclude the variant of market situation development with the price rollback to the level of 134.00 and uptrend continuation after support test.

USDJPY
Risk Warning: the result of previous trading operations do not guarantee the same results in the future

EURGBP, “Euro vs Great Britain Pound”

On H4, EURGBP has formed a Inverted Hammer pattern. At this stage, the signal from the candlestick pattern has led to an upward wave. The resistance level of 0.8870 may be the target for the upside. Having tested it and broken through, the price has a chance to continue the upward trend. However, decrease of the price to the level of 0.8815 should not be excluded before the growth.

EURGBP

Article By RoboForex.com

Attention!
Forecasts presented in this section only reflect the author’s private opinion and should not be considered as guidance for trading. RoboForex LP bears no responsibility for trading results based on trading recommendations described in these analytical reviews.