InvestMacro

COT Bonds Charts: Speculator Bets led by Ultra Treasury Bonds & Ultra 10-Year Bonds

Here are the latest charts and statistics for the Commitment of Traders (COT) reports data published by the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

The latest COT data is updated through Tuesday August 20th and shows a quick view of how large traders (for-profit speculators and commercial hedgers) were positioned in the futures markets.

Weekly Speculator Changes led by Ultra Treasury Bonds & Ultra 10-Year Bonds

The COT bond market speculator bets were lower this week as just two out of the eight bond markets we cover had higher positioning while the other six markets had lower speculator contracts.

Leading the gains for the bond markets was the Ultra Treasury Bonds (23,519 contracts) with the Ultra 10-Year Bonds (15,073 contracts) also showing a positive week.

The bond markets with declines in speculator bets for the week were the 10-Year Bonds (-177,869 contracts), the SOFR 3-Months (-63,211 contracts), the 2-Year Bonds (-47,974 contracts), the Fed Funds (-45,221 contracts), the 5-Year Bonds (-41,738 contracts) and with the US Treasury Bonds (-7,165 contracts) also registering lower bets on the week.

Bonds Net Speculators Leaderboard

Legend: Weekly Speculators Change | Speculators Current Net Position | Speculators Strength Score compared to last 3-Years (0-100 range)

Strength Scores led by SOFR 3-Months & US Treasury Bonds

COT Strength Scores (a normalized measure of Speculator positions over a 3-Year range, from 0 to 100 where above 80 is Extreme-Bullish and below 20 is Extreme-Bearish) showed that the SOFR 3-Months (80 percent) and the US Treasury Bonds (72 percent) lead the bond markets this week. The Ultra Treasury Bonds (69 percent) comes in as the next highest in the weekly strength scores.

On the downside, the 5-Year Bonds (0 percent) and the 10-Year Bonds (0 percent) come in at the lowest strength level currently and are in Extreme-Bearish territory (below 20 percent). The next lowest strength scores were the 2-Year Bonds (21 percent) and the Ultra 10-Year Bonds (30 percent).

Strength Statistics:
Fed Funds (35.9 percent) vs Fed Funds previous week (46.2 percent)
2-Year Bond (20.7 percent) vs 2-Year Bond previous week (23.8 percent)
5-Year Bond (0.0 percent) vs 5-Year Bond previous week (2.4 percent)
10-Year Bond (0.0 percent) vs 10-Year Bond previous week (14.6 percent)
Ultra 10-Year Bond (29.7 percent) vs Ultra 10-Year Bond previous week (26.5 percent)
US Treasury Bond (71.8 percent) vs US Treasury Bond previous week (74.3 percent)
Ultra US Treasury Bond (68.8 percent) vs Ultra US Treasury Bond previous week (56.4 percent)
SOFR 3-Months (80.0 percent) vs SOFR 3-Months previous week (83.3 percent)

Ultra Treasury Bonds & SOFR 3-Months top the 6-Week Strength Trends

COT Strength Score Trends (or move index, calculates the 6-week changes in strength scores) showed that the Ultra Treasury Bonds (42 percent) and the SOFR 3-Months (27 percent) lead the past six weeks trends for bonds. The 2-Year Bonds (5 percent) and the are the next highest positive movers in the latest trends data.

The 10-Year Bonds (-51 percent) leads the downside trend scores currently with the 5-Year Bonds (-10 percent) and the Fed Funds (-1 percent) following next with lower trend scores.

Strength Trend Statistics:
Fed Funds (-0.7 percent) vs Fed Funds previous week (15.5 percent)
2-Year Bond (5.1 percent) vs 2-Year Bond previous week (7.4 percent)
5-Year Bond (-9.9 percent) vs 5-Year Bond previous week (-9.2 percent)
10-Year Bond (-50.9 percent) vs 10-Year Bond previous week (-42.2 percent)
Ultra 10-Year Bond (-0.5 percent) vs Ultra 10-Year Bond previous week (0.3 percent)
US Treasury Bond (0.3 percent) vs US Treasury Bond previous week (-1.6 percent)
Ultra US Treasury Bond (42.2 percent) vs Ultra US Treasury Bond previous week (23.2 percent)
SOFR 3-Months (27.5 percent) vs SOFR 3-Months previous week (36.5 percent)

Secured Overnight Financing Rate (3-Month) Futures:

The Secured Overnight Financing Rate (3-Month) large speculator standing this week was a net position of 381,853 contracts in the data reported through Tuesday. This was a weekly reduction of -63,211 contracts from the previous week which had a total of 445,064 net contracts.

This week’s current strength score (the trader positioning range over the past three years, measured from 0 to 100) shows the speculators are currently Bullish with a score of 80.0 percent. The commercials are Bearish-Extreme with a score of 19.9 percent and the small traders (not shown in chart) are Bullish-Extreme with a score of 87.2 percent.

Price Trend-Following Model: Weak Uptrend

Our weekly trend-following model classifies the current market price position as: Weak Uptrend. The current action for the model is considered to be: Hold – Maintain Long Position.

SOFR 3-Months Statistics	SPECULATORS	COMMERCIALS	SMALL TRADERS
– Percent of Open Interest Longs:	15.4	55.2	0.4
– Percent of Open Interest Shorts:	11.9	58.7	0.4
– Net Position:	381,853	-380,583	-1,270
– Gross Longs:	1,686,980	6,061,551	38,761
– Gross Shorts:	1,305,127	6,442,134	40,031
– Long to Short Ratio:	1.3 to 1	0.9 to 1	1.0 to 1
NET POSITION TREND:
– Strength Index Score (3 Year Range Pct):	80.0	19.9	87.2
– Strength Index Reading (3 Year Range):	Bullish	Bearish-Extreme	Bullish-Extreme
NET POSITION MOVEMENT INDEX:
– 6-Week Change in Strength Index:	27.5	-27.5	-0.6

30-Day Federal Funds Futures:

The 30-Day Federal Funds large speculator standing this week was a net position of -136,512 contracts in the data reported through Tuesday. This was a weekly decline of -45,221 contracts from the previous week which had a total of -91,291 net contracts.

This week’s current strength score (the trader positioning range over the past three years, measured from 0 to 100) shows the speculators are currently Bearish with a score of 35.9 percent. The commercials are Bullish with a score of 62.2 percent and the small traders (not shown in chart) are Bullish with a score of 68.4 percent.

Price Trend-Following Model: Downtrend

Our weekly trend-following model classifies the current market price position as: Downtrend. The current action for the model is considered to be: Hold – Maintain Short Position.

30-Day Federal Funds Statistics	SPECULATORS	COMMERCIALS	SMALL TRADERS
– Percent of Open Interest Longs:	8.5	75.3	1.7
– Percent of Open Interest Shorts:	16.4	66.9	2.2
– Net Position:	-136,512	145,612	-9,100
– Gross Longs:	147,009	1,304,235	28,950
– Gross Shorts:	283,521	1,158,623	38,050
– Long to Short Ratio:	0.5 to 1	1.1 to 1	0.8 to 1
NET POSITION TREND:
– Strength Index Score (3 Year Range Pct):	35.9	62.2	68.4
– Strength Index Reading (3 Year Range):	Bearish	Bullish	Bullish
NET POSITION MOVEMENT INDEX:
– 6-Week Change in Strength Index:	-0.7	3.7	-25.6

2-Year Treasury Note Futures:

The 2-Year Treasury Note large speculator standing this week was a net position of -1,152,580 contracts in the data reported through Tuesday. This was a weekly fall of -47,974 contracts from the previous week which had a total of -1,104,606 net contracts.

This week’s current strength score (the trader positioning range over the past three years, measured from 0 to 100) shows the speculators are currently Bearish with a score of 20.7 percent. The commercials are Bullish with a score of 72.5 percent and the small traders (not shown in chart) are Bullish-Extreme with a score of 96.7 percent.

Price Trend-Following Model: Strong Uptrend

Our weekly trend-following model classifies the current market price position as: Strong Uptrend. The current action for the model is considered to be: Hold – Maintain Long Position.

2-Year Treasury Note Statistics	SPECULATORS	COMMERCIALS	SMALL TRADERS
– Percent of Open Interest Longs:	14.5	76.8	6.9
– Percent of Open Interest Shorts:	40.3	55.4	2.6
– Net Position:	-1,152,580	960,037	192,543
– Gross Longs:	648,767	3,436,139	307,340
– Gross Shorts:	1,801,347	2,476,102	114,797
– Long to Short Ratio:	0.4 to 1	1.4 to 1	2.7 to 1
NET POSITION TREND:
– Strength Index Score (3 Year Range Pct):	20.7	72.5	96.7
– Strength Index Reading (3 Year Range):	Bearish	Bullish	Bullish-Extreme
NET POSITION MOVEMENT INDEX:
– 6-Week Change in Strength Index:	5.1	-8.3	10.6

5-Year Treasury Note Futures:

The 5-Year Treasury Note large speculator standing this week was a net position of -1,736,810 contracts in the data reported through Tuesday. This was a weekly fall of -41,738 contracts from the previous week which had a total of -1,695,072 net contracts.

This week’s current strength score (the trader positioning range over the past three years, measured from 0 to 100) shows the speculators are currently Bearish-Extreme with a score of 0.0 percent. The commercials are Bullish-Extreme with a score of 100.0 percent and the small traders (not shown in chart) are Bullish-Extreme with a score of 99.9 percent.

Price Trend-Following Model: Strong Uptrend

Our weekly trend-following model classifies the current market price position as: Strong Uptrend. The current action for the model is considered to be: Hold – Maintain Long Position.

5-Year Treasury Note Statistics	SPECULATORS	COMMERCIALS	SMALL TRADERS
– Percent of Open Interest Longs:	8.5	82.1	7.1
– Percent of Open Interest Shorts:	33.9	60.4	3.5
– Net Position:	-1,736,810	1,486,515	250,295
– Gross Longs:	586,030	5,625,205	488,422
– Gross Shorts:	2,322,840	4,138,690	238,127
– Long to Short Ratio:	0.3 to 1	1.4 to 1	2.1 to 1
NET POSITION TREND:
– Strength Index Score (3 Year Range Pct):	0.0	100.0	99.9
– Strength Index Reading (3 Year Range):	Bearish-Extreme	Bullish-Extreme	Bullish-Extreme
NET POSITION MOVEMENT INDEX:
– 6-Week Change in Strength Index:	-9.9	5.9	16.8

10-Year Treasury Note Futures:

The 10-Year Treasury Note large speculator standing this week was a net position of -1,038,112 contracts in the data reported through Tuesday. This was a weekly decrease of -177,869 contracts from the previous week which had a total of -860,243 net contracts.

Price Trend-Following Model: Strong Uptrend

Our weekly trend-following model classifies the current market price position as: Strong Uptrend. The current action for the model is considered to be: Hold – Maintain Long Position.

10-Year Treasury Note Statistics	SPECULATORS	COMMERCIALS	SMALL TRADERS
– Percent of Open Interest Longs:	7.8	78.3	9.3
– Percent of Open Interest Shorts:	27.4	61.3	6.7
– Net Position:	-1,038,112	898,127	139,985
– Gross Longs:	411,629	4,134,790	493,072
– Gross Shorts:	1,449,741	3,236,663	353,087
– Long to Short Ratio:	0.3 to 1	1.3 to 1	1.4 to 1
NET POSITION TREND:
– Strength Index Score (3 Year Range Pct):	0.0	100.0	99.0
– Strength Index Reading (3 Year Range):	Bearish-Extreme	Bullish-Extreme	Bullish-Extreme
NET POSITION MOVEMENT INDEX:
– 6-Week Change in Strength Index:	-50.9	67.9	15.0

Ultra 10-Year Notes Futures:

The Ultra 10-Year Notes large speculator standing this week was a net position of -135,560 contracts in the data reported through Tuesday. This was a weekly gain of 15,073 contracts from the previous week which had a total of -150,633 net contracts.

This week’s current strength score (the trader positioning range over the past three years, measured from 0 to 100) shows the speculators are currently Bearish with a score of 29.7 percent. The commercials are Bullish with a score of 53.4 percent and the small traders (not shown in chart) are Bullish-Extreme with a score of 87.6 percent.

Price Trend-Following Model: Weak Uptrend

Our weekly trend-following model classifies the current market price position as: Weak Uptrend. The current action for the model is considered to be: Hold – Maintain Long Position.

Ultra 10-Year Notes Statistics	SPECULATORS	COMMERCIALS	SMALL TRADERS
– Percent of Open Interest Longs:	13.3	74.4	10.3
– Percent of Open Interest Shorts:	19.4	66.3	12.2
– Net Position:	-135,560	177,795	-42,235
– Gross Longs:	291,156	1,634,861	225,405
– Gross Shorts:	426,716	1,457,066	267,640
– Long to Short Ratio:	0.7 to 1	1.1 to 1	0.8 to 1
NET POSITION TREND:
– Strength Index Score (3 Year Range Pct):	29.7	53.4	87.6
– Strength Index Reading (3 Year Range):	Bearish	Bullish	Bullish-Extreme
NET POSITION MOVEMENT INDEX:
– 6-Week Change in Strength Index:	-0.5	-5.3	12.7

US Treasury Bonds Futures:

The US Treasury Bonds large speculator standing this week was a net position of -33,495 contracts in the data reported through Tuesday. This was a weekly decrease of -7,165 contracts from the previous week which had a total of -26,330 net contracts.

This week’s current strength score (the trader positioning range over the past three years, measured from 0 to 100) shows the speculators are currently Bullish with a score of 71.8 percent. The commercials are Bearish-Extreme with a score of 5.7 percent and the small traders (not shown in chart) are Bullish-Extreme with a score of 96.7 percent.

Price Trend-Following Model: Strong Uptrend

Our weekly trend-following model classifies the current market price position as: Strong Uptrend. The current action for the model is considered to be: Hold – Maintain Long Position.

US Treasury Bonds Statistics	SPECULATORS	COMMERCIALS	SMALL TRADERS
– Percent of Open Interest Longs:	19.6	63.1	12.9
– Percent of Open Interest Shorts:	21.5	66.6	7.6
– Net Position:	-33,495	-62,345	95,840
– Gross Longs:	349,758	1,123,590	230,592
– Gross Shorts:	383,253	1,185,935	134,752
– Long to Short Ratio:	0.9 to 1	0.9 to 1	1.7 to 1
NET POSITION TREND:
– Strength Index Score (3 Year Range Pct):	71.8	5.7	96.7
– Strength Index Reading (3 Year Range):	Bullish	Bearish-Extreme	Bullish-Extreme
NET POSITION MOVEMENT INDEX:
– 6-Week Change in Strength Index:	0.3	-10.4	22.6

Ultra US Treasury Bonds Futures:

The Ultra US Treasury Bonds large speculator standing this week was a net position of -325,614 contracts in the data reported through Tuesday. This was a weekly rise of 23,519 contracts from the previous week which had a total of -349,133 net contracts.

This week’s current strength score (the trader positioning range over the past three years, measured from 0 to 100) shows the speculators are currently Bullish with a score of 68.8 percent. The commercials are Bearish with a score of 39.8 percent and the small traders (not shown in chart) are Bearish with a score of 44.4 percent.

Price Trend-Following Model: Strong Uptrend

Our weekly trend-following model classifies the current market price position as: Strong Uptrend. The current action for the model is considered to be: Hold – Maintain Long Position.

Ultra US Treasury Bonds Statistics	SPECULATORS	COMMERCIALS	SMALL TRADERS
– Percent of Open Interest Longs:	8.9	77.3	10.9
– Percent of Open Interest Shorts:	28.2	59.4	9.5
– Net Position:	-325,614	301,909	23,705
– Gross Longs:	150,286	1,305,478	184,173
– Gross Shorts:	475,900	1,003,569	160,468
– Long to Short Ratio:	0.3 to 1	1.3 to 1	1.1 to 1
NET POSITION TREND:
– Strength Index Score (3 Year Range Pct):	68.8	39.8	44.4
– Strength Index Reading (3 Year Range):	Bullish	Bearish	Bearish
NET POSITION MOVEMENT INDEX:
– 6-Week Change in Strength Index:	42.2	-52.6	21.2

Article By InvestMacro – Receive our weekly COT Newsletter

*COT Report: The COT data, released weekly to the public each Friday, is updated through the most recent Tuesday (data is 3 days old) and shows a quick view of how large speculators or non-commercials (for-profit traders) were positioned in the futures markets.

The CFTC categorizes trader positions according to commercial hedgers (traders who use futures contracts for hedging as part of the business), non-commercials (large traders who speculate to realize trading profits) and nonreportable traders (usually small traders/speculators) as well as their open interest (contracts open in the market at time of reporting). See CFTC criteria here.

24 Aug

COT Soft Commodities Charts: Speculator Bets led by Wheat & Soybean Oil

By InvestMacro

Here are the latest charts and statistics for the Commitment of Traders (COT) reports data published by the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

The latest COT data is updated through Tuesday August 20th and shows a quick view of how large traders (for-profit speculators and commercial entities) were positioned in the futures markets.

Weekly Speculator Changes led by Wheat & Soybean Oil

The COT soft commodities markets speculator bets were slightly lower this week as five out of the eleven softs markets we cover had higher positioning while the other six markets had lower speculator contracts.

Leading the gains for the softs markets was Wheat (13,199 contracts) with Soybean Oil (6,693 contracts), Coffee (5,218 contracts), Lean Hogs (4,692 contracts) and Soybean Meal (4,159 contracts) also showing positive weeks.

The markets with the declines in speculator bets this week were Sugar (-15,258 contracts) with Soybeans (-13,170 contracts), Corn (-11,291 contracts), Cocoa (-1,380 contracts), Cotton (-1,158 contracts) and with Live Cattle (-615 contracts) also registering lower bets on the week.

Soft Commodities Net Speculators Leaderboard

Legend: Weekly Speculators Change | Speculators Current Net Position | Speculators Strength Score compared to last 3-Years (0-100 range)

Strength Scores led by Coffee & Wheat

COT Strength Scores (a normalized measure of Speculator positions over a 3-Year range, from 0 to 100 where above 80 is Extreme-Bullish and below 20 is Extreme-Bearish) showed that Coffee (88 percent) leads the softs markets this week. Wheat (52 percent) comes in as the next highest in the weekly strength scores.

On the downside, Cotton (0 percent), Soybeans (4 percent), Sugar (8 percent), Corn (13 percent), Lean Hogs (13 percent), Live Cattle (17 percent) and Soybean Oil (18 percent) come in at the lowest strength levels currently and are in Extreme-Bearish territory (below 20 percent).

Strength Statistics:
Corn (12.8 percent) vs Corn previous week (14.3 percent)
Sugar (7.9 percent) vs Sugar previous week (13.1 percent)
Coffee (88.4 percent) vs Coffee previous week (83.3 percent)
Soybeans (4.3 percent) vs Soybeans previous week (7.4 percent)
Soybean Oil (18.1 percent) vs Soybean Oil previous week (14.4 percent)
Soybean Meal (33.0 percent) vs Soybean Meal previous week (31.3 percent)
Live Cattle (17.3 percent) vs Live Cattle previous week (18.0 percent)
Lean Hogs (12.7 percent) vs Lean Hogs previous week (8.6 percent)
Cotton (0.0 percent) vs Cotton previous week (0.7 percent)
Cocoa (39.4 percent) vs Cocoa previous week (40.8 percent)
Wheat (51.6 percent) vs Wheat previous week (42.0 percent)

Corn tops the 6-Week Strength Trends

COT Strength Score Trends (or move index, calculates the 6-week changes in strength scores) showed that Corn (10 percent), Lean Hogs (7 percent) and Wheat (7 percent) lead the past six weeks trends for soft commodities.

Soybean Oil (-27 percent) leads the downside trend scores currently with Soybean Meal (-22 percent), Live Cattle (-17 percent) and Sugar (-16 percent) following next with lower trend scores.

Strength Trend Statistics:
Corn (9.5 percent) vs Corn previous week (9.5 percent)
Sugar (-16.5 percent) vs Sugar previous week (-10.3 percent)
Coffee (-11.0 percent) vs Coffee previous week (-8.6 percent)
Soybeans (-6.8 percent) vs Soybeans previous week (-10.3 percent)
Soybean Oil (-26.9 percent) vs Soybean Oil previous week (-10.2 percent)
Soybean Meal (-21.6 percent) vs Soybean Meal previous week (-27.6 percent)
Live Cattle (-16.9 percent) vs Live Cattle previous week (-15.5 percent)
Lean Hogs (6.7 percent) vs Lean Hogs previous week (2.2 percent)
Cotton (-11.2 percent) vs Cotton previous week (-14.8 percent)
Cocoa (-2.9 percent) vs Cocoa previous week (0.1 percent)
Wheat (6.5 percent) vs Wheat previous week (-0.2 percent)

Individual Soft Commodities Markets:

CORN Futures:

The CORN large speculator standing this week totaled a net position of -165,296 contracts in the data reported through Tuesday. This was a weekly decline of -11,291 contracts from the previous week which had a total of -154,005 net contracts.

This week’s current strength score (the trader positioning range over the past three years, measured from 0 to 100) shows the speculators are currently Bearish-Extreme with a score of 12.8 percent. The commercials are Bullish-Extreme with a score of 88.7 percent and the small traders (not shown in chart) are Bullish with a score of 65.3 percent.

Price Trend-Following Model: Strong Downtrend

Our weekly trend-following model classifies the current market price position as: Strong Downtrend. The current action for the model is considered to be: Hold – Maintain Short Position.

CORN Futures Statistics	SPECULATORS	COMMERCIALS	SMALL TRADERS
– Percent of Open Interest Longs:	20.6	44.9	9.1
– Percent of Open Interest Shorts:	31.2	32.2	11.1
– Net Position:	-165,296	197,121	-31,825
– Gross Longs:	319,844	697,858	140,896
– Gross Shorts:	485,140	500,737	172,721
– Long to Short Ratio:	0.7 to 1	1.4 to 1	0.8 to 1
NET POSITION TREND:
– Strength Index Score (3 Year Range Pct):	12.8	88.7	65.3
– Strength Index Reading (3 Year Range):	Bearish-Extreme	Bullish-Extreme	Bullish
NET POSITION MOVEMENT INDEX:
– 6-Week Change in Strength Index:	9.5	-7.1	-28.1

SUGAR Futures:

The SUGAR large speculator standing this week totaled a net position of 19,304 contracts in the data reported through Tuesday. This was a weekly fall of -15,258 contracts from the previous week which had a total of 34,562 net contracts.

This week’s current strength score (the trader positioning range over the past three years, measured from 0 to 100) shows the speculators are currently Bearish-Extreme with a score of 7.9 percent. The commercials are Bullish-Extreme with a score of 92.7 percent and the small traders (not shown in chart) are Bearish-Extreme with a score of 11.8 percent.

Price Trend-Following Model: Downtrend

Our weekly trend-following model classifies the current market price position as: Downtrend. The current action for the model is considered to be: Hold – Maintain Short Position.

SUGAR Futures Statistics	SPECULATORS	COMMERCIALS	SMALL TRADERS
– Percent of Open Interest Longs:	22.9	54.2	7.5
– Percent of Open Interest Shorts:	20.5	55.8	8.3
– Net Position:	19,304	-13,294	-6,010
– Gross Longs:	188,316	446,314	62,107
– Gross Shorts:	169,012	459,608	68,117
– Long to Short Ratio:	1.1 to 1	1.0 to 1	0.9 to 1
NET POSITION TREND:
– Strength Index Score (3 Year Range Pct):	7.9	92.7	11.8
– Strength Index Reading (3 Year Range):	Bearish-Extreme	Bullish-Extreme	Bearish-Extreme
NET POSITION MOVEMENT INDEX:
– 6-Week Change in Strength Index:	-16.5	19.2	-24.5

COFFEE Futures:

The COFFEE large speculator standing this week totaled a net position of 64,158 contracts in the data reported through Tuesday. This was a weekly rise of 5,218 contracts from the previous week which had a total of 58,940 net contracts.

This week’s current strength score (the trader positioning range over the past three years, measured from 0 to 100) shows the speculators are currently Bullish-Extreme with a score of 88.4 percent. The commercials are Bearish-Extreme with a score of 10.8 percent and the small traders (not shown in chart) are Bullish with a score of 71.8 percent.

Price Trend-Following Model: Strong Uptrend

Our weekly trend-following model classifies the current market price position as: Strong Uptrend. The current action for the model is considered to be: Hold – Maintain Long Position.

COFFEE Futures Statistics	SPECULATORS	COMMERCIALS	SMALL TRADERS
– Percent of Open Interest Longs:	40.9	38.8	4.3
– Percent of Open Interest Shorts:	7.7	73.8	2.4
– Net Position:	64,158	-67,737	3,579
– Gross Longs:	79,032	74,979	8,296
– Gross Shorts:	14,874	142,716	4,717
– Long to Short Ratio:	5.3 to 1	0.5 to 1	1.8 to 1
NET POSITION TREND:
– Strength Index Score (3 Year Range Pct):	88.4	10.8	71.8
– Strength Index Reading (3 Year Range):	Bullish-Extreme	Bearish-Extreme	Bullish
NET POSITION MOVEMENT INDEX:
– 6-Week Change in Strength Index:	-11.0	10.5	6.5

SOYBEANS Futures:

The SOYBEANS large speculator standing this week totaled a net position of -178,893 contracts in the data reported through Tuesday. This was a weekly reduction of -13,170 contracts from the previous week which had a total of -165,723 net contracts.

This week’s current strength score (the trader positioning range over the past three years, measured from 0 to 100) shows the speculators are currently Bearish-Extreme with a score of 4.3 percent. The commercials are Bullish-Extreme with a score of 97.6 percent and the small traders (not shown in chart) are Bullish with a score of 64.0 percent.

Price Trend-Following Model: Strong Downtrend

Our weekly trend-following model classifies the current market price position as: Strong Downtrend. The current action for the model is considered to be: Hold – Maintain Short Position.

SOYBEANS Futures Statistics	SPECULATORS	COMMERCIALS	SMALL TRADERS
– Percent of Open Interest Longs:	13.0	62.7	4.9
– Percent of Open Interest Shorts:	34.9	38.5	7.2
– Net Position:	-178,893	197,454	-18,561
– Gross Longs:	105,737	511,626	39,933
– Gross Shorts:	284,630	314,172	58,494
– Long to Short Ratio:	0.4 to 1	1.6 to 1	0.7 to 1
NET POSITION TREND:
– Strength Index Score (3 Year Range Pct):	4.3	97.6	64.0
– Strength Index Reading (3 Year Range):	Bearish-Extreme	Bullish-Extreme	Bullish
NET POSITION MOVEMENT INDEX:
– 6-Week Change in Strength Index:	-6.8	9.1	-20.9

SOYBEAN OIL Futures:

The SOYBEAN OIL large speculator standing this week totaled a net position of -42,670 contracts in the data reported through Tuesday. This was a weekly gain of 6,693 contracts from the previous week which had a total of -49,363 net contracts.

This week’s current strength score (the trader positioning range over the past three years, measured from 0 to 100) shows the speculators are currently Bearish-Extreme with a score of 18.1 percent. The commercials are Bullish-Extreme with a score of 82.3 percent and the small traders (not shown in chart) are Bearish with a score of 27.7 percent.

Price Trend-Following Model: Strong Downtrend

Our weekly trend-following model classifies the current market price position as: Strong Downtrend. The current action for the model is considered to be: Hold – Maintain Short Position.

SOYBEAN OIL Futures Statistics	SPECULATORS	COMMERCIALS	SMALL TRADERS
– Percent of Open Interest Longs:	23.3	53.2	5.3
– Percent of Open Interest Shorts:	30.7	46.4	4.7
– Net Position:	-42,670	39,149	3,521
– Gross Longs:	133,857	305,934	30,612
– Gross Shorts:	176,527	266,785	27,091
– Long to Short Ratio:	0.8 to 1	1.1 to 1	1.1 to 1
NET POSITION TREND:
– Strength Index Score (3 Year Range Pct):	18.1	82.3	27.7
– Strength Index Reading (3 Year Range):	Bearish-Extreme	Bullish-Extreme	Bearish
NET POSITION MOVEMENT INDEX:
– 6-Week Change in Strength Index:	-26.9	24.3	-0.6

SOYBEAN MEAL Futures:

The SOYBEAN MEAL large speculator standing this week totaled a net position of 13,574 contracts in the data reported through Tuesday. This was a weekly lift of 4,159 contracts from the previous week which had a total of 9,415 net contracts.

This week’s current strength score (the trader positioning range over the past three years, measured from 0 to 100) shows the speculators are currently Bearish with a score of 33.0 percent. The commercials are Bullish with a score of 64.2 percent and the small traders (not shown in chart) are Bearish with a score of 48.5 percent.

Price Trend-Following Model: Strong Downtrend

Our weekly trend-following model classifies the current market price position as: Strong Downtrend. The current action for the model is considered to be: Hold – Maintain Short Position.

SOYBEAN MEAL Futures Statistics	SPECULATORS	COMMERCIALS	SMALL TRADERS
– Percent of Open Interest Longs:	22.2	46.4	9.3
– Percent of Open Interest Shorts:	19.6	52.8	5.4
– Net Position:	13,574	-34,197	20,623
– Gross Longs:	118,191	247,393	49,516
– Gross Shorts:	104,617	281,590	28,893
– Long to Short Ratio:	1.1 to 1	0.9 to 1	1.7 to 1
NET POSITION TREND:
– Strength Index Score (3 Year Range Pct):	33.0	64.2	48.5
– Strength Index Reading (3 Year Range):	Bearish	Bullish	Bearish
NET POSITION MOVEMENT INDEX:
– 6-Week Change in Strength Index:	-21.6	19.9	11.5

LIVE CATTLE Futures:

The LIVE CATTLE large speculator standing this week totaled a net position of 35,622 contracts in the data reported through Tuesday. This was a weekly reduction of -615 contracts from the previous week which had a total of 36,237 net contracts.

This week’s current strength score (the trader positioning range over the past three years, measured from 0 to 100) shows the speculators are currently Bearish-Extreme with a score of 17.3 percent. The commercials are Bullish-Extreme with a score of 95.1 percent and the small traders (not shown in chart) are Bearish with a score of 20.4 percent.

Price Trend-Following Model: Weak Uptrend

Our weekly trend-following model classifies the current market price position as: Weak Uptrend. The current action for the model is considered to be: Hold – Maintain Long Position.

LIVE CATTLE Futures Statistics	SPECULATORS	COMMERCIALS	SMALL TRADERS
– Percent of Open Interest Longs:	34.3	36.0	9.7
– Percent of Open Interest Shorts:	21.9	43.9	14.2
– Net Position:	35,622	-22,612	-13,010
– Gross Longs:	98,255	103,189	27,738
– Gross Shorts:	62,633	125,801	40,748
– Long to Short Ratio:	1.6 to 1	0.8 to 1	0.7 to 1
NET POSITION TREND:
– Strength Index Score (3 Year Range Pct):	17.3	95.1	20.4
– Strength Index Reading (3 Year Range):	Bearish-Extreme	Bullish-Extreme	Bearish
NET POSITION MOVEMENT INDEX:
– 6-Week Change in Strength Index:	-16.9	22.5	-14.9

LEAN HOGS Futures:

The LEAN HOGS large speculator standing this week totaled a net position of -21,796 contracts in the data reported through Tuesday. This was a weekly boost of 4,692 contracts from the previous week which had a total of -26,488 net contracts.

This week’s current strength score (the trader positioning range over the past three years, measured from 0 to 100) shows the speculators are currently Bearish-Extreme with a score of 12.7 percent. The commercials are Bullish-Extreme with a score of 91.6 percent and the small traders (not shown in chart) are Bullish with a score of 62.2 percent.

Price Trend-Following Model: Strong Downtrend

Our weekly trend-following model classifies the current market price position as: Strong Downtrend. The current action for the model is considered to be: Hold – Maintain Short Position.

LEAN HOGS Futures Statistics	SPECULATORS	COMMERCIALS	SMALL TRADERS
– Percent of Open Interest Longs:	36.9	39.1	6.1
– Percent of Open Interest Shorts:	46.3	27.7	8.1
– Net Position:	-21,796	26,506	-4,710
– Gross Longs:	86,247	91,225	14,296
– Gross Shorts:	108,043	64,719	19,006
– Long to Short Ratio:	0.8 to 1	1.4 to 1	0.8 to 1
NET POSITION TREND:
– Strength Index Score (3 Year Range Pct):	12.7	91.6	62.2
– Strength Index Reading (3 Year Range):	Bearish-Extreme	Bullish-Extreme	Bullish
NET POSITION MOVEMENT INDEX:
– 6-Week Change in Strength Index:	6.7	-5.4	-11.0

COTTON Futures:

The COTTON large speculator standing this week totaled a net position of -42,828 contracts in the data reported through Tuesday. This was a weekly decrease of -1,158 contracts from the previous week which had a total of -41,670 net contracts.

This week’s current strength score (the trader positioning range over the past three years, measured from 0 to 100) shows the speculators are currently Bearish-Extreme with a score of 0.0 percent. The commercials are Bullish-Extreme with a score of 99.3 percent and the small traders (not shown in chart) are Bearish-Extreme with a score of 14.0 percent.

Price Trend-Following Model: Downtrend

Our weekly trend-following model classifies the current market price position as: Downtrend. The current action for the model is considered to be: Hold – Maintain Short Position.

COTTON Futures Statistics	SPECULATORS	COMMERCIALS	SMALL TRADERS
– Percent of Open Interest Longs:	25.2	49.5	5.8
– Percent of Open Interest Shorts:	43.7	30.8	5.9
– Net Position:	-42,828	43,223	-395
– Gross Longs:	58,393	114,521	13,326
– Gross Shorts:	101,221	71,298	13,721
– Long to Short Ratio:	0.6 to 1	1.6 to 1	1.0 to 1
NET POSITION TREND:
– Strength Index Score (3 Year Range Pct):	0.0	99.3	14.0
– Strength Index Reading (3 Year Range):	Bearish-Extreme	Bullish-Extreme	Bearish-Extreme
NET POSITION MOVEMENT INDEX:
– 6-Week Change in Strength Index:	-11.2	9.1	13.3

COCOA Futures:

The COCOA large speculator standing this week totaled a net position of 28,888 contracts in the data reported through Tuesday. This was a weekly reduction of -1,380 contracts from the previous week which had a total of 30,268 net contracts.

This week’s current strength score (the trader positioning range over the past three years, measured from 0 to 100) shows the speculators are currently Bearish with a score of 39.4 percent. The commercials are Bullish with a score of 56.7 percent and the small traders (not shown in chart) are Bullish with a score of 66.5 percent.

Price Trend-Following Model: Weak Downtrend

Our weekly trend-following model classifies the current market price position as: Weak Downtrend. The current action for the model is considered to be: Hold – Maintain Short Position.

COCOA Futures Statistics	SPECULATORS	COMMERCIALS	SMALL TRADERS
– Percent of Open Interest Longs:	38.9	30.3	8.8
– Percent of Open Interest Shorts:	17.3	56.7	4.0
– Net Position:	28,888	-35,270	6,382
– Gross Longs:	51,923	40,369	11,703
– Gross Shorts:	23,035	75,639	5,321
– Long to Short Ratio:	2.3 to 1	0.5 to 1	2.2 to 1
NET POSITION TREND:
– Strength Index Score (3 Year Range Pct):	39.4	56.7	66.5
– Strength Index Reading (3 Year Range):	Bearish	Bullish	Bullish
NET POSITION MOVEMENT INDEX:
– 6-Week Change in Strength Index:	-2.9	3.2	-2.6

WHEAT Futures:

The WHEAT large speculator standing this week totaled a net position of -25,706 contracts in the data reported through Tuesday. This was a weekly lift of 13,199 contracts from the previous week which had a total of -38,905 net contracts.

This week’s current strength score (the trader positioning range over the past three years, measured from 0 to 100) shows the speculators are currently Bullish with a score of 51.6 percent. The commercials are Bearish with a score of 48.9 percent and the small traders (not shown in chart) are Bearish with a score of 34.2 percent.

Price Trend-Following Model: Strong Downtrend

Our weekly trend-following model classifies the current market price position as: Strong Downtrend. The current action for the model is considered to be: Hold – Maintain Short Position.

WHEAT Futures Statistics	SPECULATORS	COMMERCIALS	SMALL TRADERS
– Percent of Open Interest Longs:	32.4	33.9	7.8
– Percent of Open Interest Shorts:	38.6	26.3	9.1
– Net Position:	-25,706	31,360	-5,654
– Gross Longs:	134,387	140,441	32,167
– Gross Shorts:	160,093	109,081	37,821
– Long to Short Ratio:	0.8 to 1	1.3 to 1	0.9 to 1
NET POSITION TREND:
– Strength Index Score (3 Year Range Pct):	51.6	48.9	34.2
– Strength Index Reading (3 Year Range):	Bullish	Bearish	Bearish
NET POSITION MOVEMENT INDEX:
– 6-Week Change in Strength Index:	6.5	-6.5	-2.8

Article By InvestMacro – Receive our weekly COT Newsletter

COT Updates Financial News Soft Commodities

24 Aug

COT Stock Market Charts: Speculator Bets led by DowJones & Nasdaq

By InvestMacro

Here are the latest charts and statistics for the Commitment of Traders (COT) data published by the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

The latest COT data is updated through Tuesday August 20th and shows a quick view of how large traders (for-profit speculators and commercial entities) were positioned in the futures markets.

Weekly Speculator Changes led by DowJones & Nasdaq

The COT stock markets speculator bets were lower this week as two out of the seven stock markets we cover had higher positioning while the other five markets had lower speculator contracts.

Leading the gains for the stock markets was the DowJones-Mini (5,491 contracts) with the Nasdaq-Mini (2,897 contracts) also showing positive weeks.

The markets with the declines in speculator bets this week were the S&P500-Mini (-61,352 contracts), the Russell-Mini (-13,871 contracts), the VIX (-4,330 contracts), the Nikkei 225 (-2,316 contracts) and with the MSCI EAFE-Mini (-461 contracts) also registering lower bets on the week.

Stock Market Net Speculators Leaderboard

Legend: Weekly Speculators Change | Speculators Current Net Position | Speculators Strength Score compared to last 3-Years (0-100 range)

Strength Scores led by VIX & DowJones-Mini

COT Strength Scores (a normalized measure of Speculator positions over a 3-Year range, from 0 to 100 where above 80 is Extreme-Bullish and below 20 is Extreme-Bearish) showed that the VIX (89 percent) and the DowJones-Mini (71 percent) lead the stock markets this week. The Russell-Mini (66 percent) and Nikkei 225 (60 percent) come in as the next highest in the weekly strength scores.

On the downside, the MSCI EAFE-Mini (27 percent) comes in at the lowest strength level currently.

Strength Statistics:
VIX (88.5 percent) vs VIX previous week (93.2 percent)
S&P500-Mini (52.1 percent) vs S&P500-Mini previous week (61.2 percent)
DowJones-Mini (71.2 percent) vs DowJones-Mini previous week (62.3 percent)
Nasdaq-Mini (56.8 percent) vs Nasdaq-Mini previous week (52.3 percent)
Russell2000-Mini (65.9 percent) vs Russell2000-Mini previous week (75.7 percent)
Nikkei USD (59.8 percent) vs Nikkei USD previous week (79.5 percent)
EAFE-Mini (27.4 percent) vs EAFE-Mini previous week (27.9 percent)

VIX & Russell-Mini top the 6-Week Strength Trends

COT Strength Score Trends (or move index, calculates the 6-week changes in strength scores) showed that the VIX (40 percent) leads the past six weeks trends for the stock markets. The Russell-Mini (29 percent), the Nikkei 225 (20 percent) and the Nasdaq-Mini (10 percent) are the next highest positive movers in the latest trends data.

The MSCI EAFE-Mini (-15 percent) leads the downside trend scores currently with the S&P500-Mini (-4 percent) coming in as the next market with lower trend scores.

Strength Trend Statistics:
VIX (39.9 percent) vs VIX previous week (35.9 percent)
S&P500-Mini (-4.4 percent) vs S&P500-Mini previous week (-1.7 percent)
DowJones-Mini (-1.7 percent) vs DowJones-Mini previous week (-8.9 percent)
Nasdaq-Mini (9.6 percent) vs Nasdaq-Mini previous week (-3.6 percent)
Russell2000-Mini (28.7 percent) vs Russell2000-Mini previous week (44.1 percent)
Nikkei USD (20.5 percent) vs Nikkei USD previous week (36.6 percent)
EAFE-Mini (-14.9 percent) vs EAFE-Mini previous week (-9.4 percent)

Individual Stock Market Charts:

VIX Volatility Futures:

The VIX Volatility large speculator standing this week recorded a net position of -24,592 contracts in the data reported through Tuesday. This was a weekly lowering of -4,330 contracts from the previous week which had a total of -20,262 net contracts.

This week’s current strength score (the trader positioning range over the past three years, measured from 0 to 100) shows the speculators are currently Bullish-Extreme with a score of 88.5 percent. The commercials are Bearish-Extreme with a score of 3.4 percent and the small traders (not shown in chart) are Bullish-Extreme with a score of 100.0 percent.

Price Trend-Following Model: Strong Uptrend

Our weekly trend-following model classifies the current market price position as: Strong Uptrend. The current action for the model is considered to be: Hold – Maintain Long Position.

VIX Volatility Futures Statistics	SPECULATORS	COMMERCIALS	SMALL TRADERS
– Percent of Open Interest Longs:	18.2	47.0	7.9
– Percent of Open Interest Shorts:	24.2	41.7	7.2
– Net Position:	-24,592	21,531	3,061
– Gross Longs:	75,004	193,348	32,701
– Gross Shorts:	99,596	171,817	29,640
– Long to Short Ratio:	0.8 to 1	1.1 to 1	1.1 to 1
NET POSITION TREND:
– Strength Index Score (3 Year Range Pct):	88.5	3.4	100.0
– Strength Index Reading (3 Year Range):	Bullish-Extreme	Bearish-Extreme	Bullish-Extreme
NET POSITION MOVEMENT INDEX:
– 6-Week Change in Strength Index:	39.9	-43.6	12.8

S&P500 Mini Futures:

The S&P500 Mini large speculator standing this week recorded a net position of -84,803 contracts in the data reported through Tuesday. This was a weekly fall of -61,352 contracts from the previous week which had a total of -23,451 net contracts.

This week’s current strength score (the trader positioning range over the past three years, measured from 0 to 100) shows the speculators are currently Bullish with a score of 52.1 percent. The commercials are Bearish with a score of 39.3 percent and the small traders (not shown in chart) are Bullish with a score of 74.1 percent.

Price Trend-Following Model: Strong Uptrend

Our weekly trend-following model classifies the current market price position as: Strong Uptrend. The current action for the model is considered to be: Hold – Maintain Long Position.

S&P500 Mini Futures Statistics	SPECULATORS	COMMERCIALS	SMALL TRADERS
– Percent of Open Interest Longs:	13.5	70.1	12.7
– Percent of Open Interest Shorts:	17.7	70.4	8.3
– Net Position:	-84,803	-4,339	89,142
– Gross Longs:	277,634	1,438,541	260,164
– Gross Shorts:	362,437	1,442,880	171,022
– Long to Short Ratio:	0.8 to 1	1.0 to 1	1.5 to 1
NET POSITION TREND:
– Strength Index Score (3 Year Range Pct):	52.1	39.3	74.1
– Strength Index Reading (3 Year Range):	Bullish	Bearish	Bullish
NET POSITION MOVEMENT INDEX:
– 6-Week Change in Strength Index:	-4.4	5.3	-3.6

Dow Jones Mini Futures:

The Dow Jones Mini large speculator standing this week recorded a net position of 6,728 contracts in the data reported through Tuesday. This was a weekly advance of 5,491 contracts from the previous week which had a total of 1,237 net contracts.

This week’s current strength score (the trader positioning range over the past three years, measured from 0 to 100) shows the speculators are currently Bullish with a score of 71.2 percent. The commercials are Bearish with a score of 27.2 percent and the small traders (not shown in chart) are Bullish with a score of 52.0 percent.

Price Trend-Following Model: Strong Uptrend

Our weekly trend-following model classifies the current market price position as: Strong Uptrend. The current action for the model is considered to be: Hold – Maintain Long Position.

Dow Jones Mini Futures Statistics	SPECULATORS	COMMERCIALS	SMALL TRADERS
– Percent of Open Interest Longs:	25.8	56.7	15.6
– Percent of Open Interest Shorts:	18.1	65.4	14.6
– Net Position:	6,728	-7,610	882
– Gross Longs:	22,507	49,419	13,628
– Gross Shorts:	15,779	57,029	12,746
– Long to Short Ratio:	1.4 to 1	0.9 to 1	1.1 to 1
NET POSITION TREND:
– Strength Index Score (3 Year Range Pct):	71.2	27.2	52.0
– Strength Index Reading (3 Year Range):	Bullish	Bearish	Bullish
NET POSITION MOVEMENT INDEX:
– 6-Week Change in Strength Index:	-1.7	5.0	-12.5

Nasdaq Mini Futures:

The Nasdaq Mini large speculator standing this week recorded a net position of 11,381 contracts in the data reported through Tuesday. This was a weekly boost of 2,897 contracts from the previous week which had a total of 8,484 net contracts.

This week’s current strength score (the trader positioning range over the past three years, measured from 0 to 100) shows the speculators are currently Bullish with a score of 56.8 percent. The commercials are Bearish with a score of 28.2 percent and the small traders (not shown in chart) are Bullish with a score of 75.2 percent.

Price Trend-Following Model: Uptrend

Our weekly trend-following model classifies the current market price position as: Uptrend. The current action for the model is considered to be: Hold – Maintain Long Position.

Nasdaq Mini Futures Statistics	SPECULATORS	COMMERCIALS	SMALL TRADERS
– Percent of Open Interest Longs:	22.8	58.5	16.0
– Percent of Open Interest Shorts:	18.1	67.6	11.5
– Net Position:	11,381	-22,205	10,824
– Gross Longs:	55,674	142,783	38,994
– Gross Shorts:	44,293	164,988	28,170
– Long to Short Ratio:	1.3 to 1	0.9 to 1	1.4 to 1
NET POSITION TREND:
– Strength Index Score (3 Year Range Pct):	56.8	28.2	75.2
– Strength Index Reading (3 Year Range):	Bullish	Bearish	Bullish
NET POSITION MOVEMENT INDEX:
– 6-Week Change in Strength Index:	9.6	-7.1	0.6

Russell 2000 Mini Futures:

The Russell 2000 Mini large speculator standing this week recorded a net position of -27,127 contracts in the data reported through Tuesday. This was a weekly fall of -13,871 contracts from the previous week which had a total of -13,256 net contracts.

This week’s current strength score (the trader positioning range over the past three years, measured from 0 to 100) shows the speculators are currently Bullish with a score of 65.9 percent. The commercials are Bearish with a score of 29.5 percent and the small traders (not shown in chart) are Bullish with a score of 73.0 percent.

Price Trend-Following Model: Strong Uptrend

Our weekly trend-following model classifies the current market price position as: Strong Uptrend. The current action for the model is considered to be: Hold – Maintain Long Position.

Russell 2000 Mini Futures Statistics	SPECULATORS	COMMERCIALS	SMALL TRADERS
– Percent of Open Interest Longs:	15.3	76.0	7.4
– Percent of Open Interest Shorts:	21.7	72.7	4.3
– Net Position:	-27,127	14,057	13,070
– Gross Longs:	64,562	321,263	31,232
– Gross Shorts:	91,689	307,206	18,162
– Long to Short Ratio:	0.7 to 1	1.0 to 1	1.7 to 1
NET POSITION TREND:
– Strength Index Score (3 Year Range Pct):	65.9	29.5	73.0
– Strength Index Reading (3 Year Range):	Bullish	Bearish	Bullish
NET POSITION MOVEMENT INDEX:
– 6-Week Change in Strength Index:	28.7	-28.7	14.3

Nikkei Stock Average (USD) Futures:

The Nikkei Stock Average (USD) large speculator standing this week recorded a net position of -2,391 contracts in the data reported through Tuesday. This was a weekly reduction of -2,316 contracts from the previous week which had a total of -75 net contracts.

This week’s current strength score (the trader positioning range over the past three years, measured from 0 to 100) shows the speculators are currently Bullish with a score of 59.8 percent. The commercials are Bearish with a score of 35.8 percent and the small traders (not shown in chart) are Bullish with a score of 63.2 percent.

Price Trend-Following Model: Strong Uptrend

Our weekly trend-following model classifies the current market price position as: Strong Uptrend. The current action for the model is considered to be: New Buy – Long Position.

Nikkei Stock Average Futures Statistics	SPECULATORS	COMMERCIALS	SMALL TRADERS
– Percent of Open Interest Longs:	15.8	60.0	24.2
– Percent of Open Interest Shorts:	32.3	50.7	17.0
– Net Position:	-2,391	1,342	1,049
– Gross Longs:	2,295	8,711	3,523
– Gross Shorts:	4,686	7,369	2,474
– Long to Short Ratio:	0.5 to 1	1.2 to 1	1.4 to 1
NET POSITION TREND:
– Strength Index Score (3 Year Range Pct):	59.8	35.8	63.2
– Strength Index Reading (3 Year Range):	Bullish	Bearish	Bullish
NET POSITION MOVEMENT INDEX:
– 6-Week Change in Strength Index:	20.5	-13.1	-10.0

MSCI EAFE Mini Futures:

The MSCI EAFE Mini large speculator standing this week recorded a net position of -38,563 contracts in the data reported through Tuesday. This was a weekly decline of -461 contracts from the previous week which had a total of -38,102 net contracts.

This week’s current strength score (the trader positioning range over the past three years, measured from 0 to 100) shows the speculators are currently Bearish with a score of 27.4 percent. The commercials are Bullish with a score of 69.9 percent and the small traders (not shown in chart) are Bearish with a score of 46.9 percent.

Price Trend-Following Model: Strong Uptrend

Our weekly trend-following model classifies the current market price position as: Strong Uptrend. The current action for the model is considered to be: Hold – Maintain Long Position.

MSCI EAFE Mini Futures Statistics	SPECULATORS	COMMERCIALS	SMALL TRADERS
– Percent of Open Interest Longs:	6.6	90.1	3.0
– Percent of Open Interest Shorts:	15.9	82.3	1.6
– Net Position:	-38,563	32,556	6,007
– Gross Longs:	27,458	375,143	12,596
– Gross Shorts:	66,021	342,587	6,589
– Long to Short Ratio:	0.4 to 1	1.1 to 1	1.9 to 1
NET POSITION TREND:
– Strength Index Score (3 Year Range Pct):	27.4	69.9	46.9
– Strength Index Reading (3 Year Range):	Bearish	Bullish	Bearish
NET POSITION MOVEMENT INDEX:
– 6-Week Change in Strength Index:	-14.9	13.5	4.8

Article By InvestMacro – Receive our weekly COT Newsletter

COT Updates Financial News Stock Market News

23 Aug

Quantum information theorists are shedding light on entanglement, one of the spooky mysteries of quantum mechanics

By William Mark Stuckey, Elizabethtown College

The year 2025 marks the 100th anniversary of the birth of quantum mechanics. In the century since the field’s inception, scientists and engineers have used quantum mechanics to create technologies such as lasers, MRI scanners and computer chips.

Today, researchers are looking toward building quantum computers and ways to securely transfer information using an entirely new sister field called quantum information science.

But despite creating all these breakthrough technologies, physicists and philosophers who study quantum mechanics still haven’t come up with the answers to some big questions raised by the field’s founders. Given recent developments in quantum information science, researchers like me are using quantum information theory to explore new ways of thinking about these unanswered foundational questions. And one direction we’re looking into relates Albert Einstein’s relativity principle to the qubit.

Quantum computers

Quantum information science focuses on building quantum computers based on the quantum “bit” of information, or qubit. The qubit is historically grounded in the discoveries of physicists Max Planck and Einstein. They instigated the development of quantum mechanics in 1900 and 1905, respectively, when they discovered that light exists in discrete, or “quantum,” bundles of energy.

These quanta of energy also come in small forms of matter, such as atoms and electrons, which make up everything in the universe. It is the odd properties of these tiny packets of matter and energy that are responsible for the computational advantages of the qubit.

A computer based on a quantum bit rather than a classical bit could have a significant computing advantage. And that’s because a classical bit produces a binary response – either a 1 or a 0 – to only one query.

In contrast, the qubit produces a binary response to infinitely many queries using the property of quantum superposition. This property allows researchers to connect multiple qubits in what’s called a quantum entangled state. Here, the entangled qubits act collectively in a way that arrays of classical bits cannot.

That means a quantum computer can do some calculations much faster than an ordinary computer. For example, one device reportedly used 76 entangled qubits to solve a sampling problem 100 trillion times faster than a classical computer.

But the exact force or principle of nature responsible for this quantum entangled state that underlies quantum computing is a big unanswered question. A solution that my colleagues and I in quantum information theory have proposed has to do with Einstein’s relativity principle.

Quantum superposition and entanglement allow qubits to contain far more information than classical bits.

Quantum information theory

The relativity principle says that the laws of physics are the same for all observers, regardless of where they are in space, how they’re oriented or how they’re moving relative to each other. My team showed how to use the relativity principle in conjunction with the principles of quantum information theory to account for quantum entangled particles.

Quantum information theorists like me think about quantum mechanics as a theory of information principles rather than a theory of forces. That’s very different than the typical approach to quantum physics, in which force and energy are important concepts for doing the calculations. In contrast, quantum information theorists don’t need to know what sort of physical force might be causing the mysterious behavior of entangled quantum particles.

That gives us an advantage for explaining quantum entanglement because, as physicist John Bell proved in 1964, any explanation for quantum entanglement in terms of forces requires what Einstein called “spooky actions at a distance.”

That’s because the measurement outcomes of the two entangled quantum particles are correlated – even if those measurements are done at the same time and the particles are physically separated by a vast distance. So, if a force is causing quantum entanglement, it would have to act faster than the speed of light. And a faster-than-light force violates Einstein’s theory of special relativity.

Quantum entanglement is important to quantum computing.

Many researchers are trying to find an explanation for quantum entanglement that doesn’t require spooky actions at a distance, like my team’s proposed solution.

Classical and quantum entanglement

In entanglement, you can know something about two particles collectively – call them particle 1 and particle 2 – so that when you measure particle 1, you immediately know something about particle 2.

Imagine you’re mailing two friends, whom physicists typically call Alice and Bob, each one glove from the same pair of gloves. When Alice opens her box and sees a left-hand glove, she’ll know immediately that when Bob opens the other box he will see the right-hand glove. Each box and glove combination produces one of two outcomes, either a right-hand glove or a left-hand glove. There’s only one possible measurement – opening the box – so Alice and Bob have entangled classical bits of information.

But in quantum entanglement the situation involves entangled qubits, which behave very differently than classical bits.

Qubit behavior

Consider a property of electrons called spin. When you measure an electron’s spin using magnets that are oriented vertically, you always get a spin that’s up or down, nothing in between. That’s a binary measurement outcome, so this is a bit of information.

Two diagrams showing electrons passing through magnets. The top diagram shows one on top and one below the electrons' path. The electrons are either deflected up or down, as indicated by the split paths, after passing through the magnet. The bottom diagram shows two magnets, one on the left and one on the right of the electrons' path. The electrons are either deflected left or right, as indicated by the split paths, after passing through the magnet. — Two magnets oriented vertically can measure an electron’s vertical spin. After moving through the magnets, the electron is deflected either up or down. Similarly, two magnets oriented horizontally can measure an electron’s horizontal spin. After moving through the magnets, the electron is deflected either left or right.
Timothy McDevitt

If you turn the magnets on their sides to measure an electron’s spin horizontally, you always get a spin that’s left or right, nothing in between. The vertical and horizontal orientations of the magnets constitute two different measurements of this same bit. So, electron spin is a qubit – it produces a binary response to multiple measurements.

Quantum superposition

Now suppose you first measure an electron’s spin vertically and find it is up, then you measure its spin horizontally. When you stand straight up, you don’t move to your right or your left at all. So, if I measure how much you move side to side as you stand straight up, I’ll get zero.

That’s exactly what you might expect for the vertical spin up electrons. Since they have vertically oriented spin up, analogous to standing straight up, they should not have any spin left or right horizontally, analogous to moving side to side.

Surprisingly, physicists have found that half of them are horizontally right and half are horizontally left. Now it doesn’t seem to make sense that a vertical spin up electron has left spin (-1) and right spin (+1) outcomes when measured horizontally, just as we expect no side-to-side movement when standing straight up.

But when you add up all the left (-1) and right (+1) spin outcomes you do get zero, as we expected in the horizontal direction when our spin state is vertical spin up. So, on average, it’s like having no side-to-side or horizontal movement when we stand straight up.

This 50-50 ratio over the binary (+1 and -1) outcomes is what physicists are talking about when they say that a vertical spin up electron is in a quantum superposition of horizontal spins left and right.

Entanglement from the relativity principle

According to quantum information theory, all of quantum mechanics, to include its quantum entangled states, is based on the qubit with its quantum superposition.

What my colleagues and I proposed is that this quantum superposition results from the relativity principle, which (again) states the laws of physics are the same for all observers with different orientations in space.

If the electron with a vertical spin in the up direction were to pass straight through the horizontal magnets as you might expect, it would have no spin horizontally. This would violate the relativity principle, which says the particle should have a spin regardless of whether it’s being measured in the horizontal or vertical direction.

Because an electron with a vertical spin in the up direction does have a spin when measured horizontally, quantum information theorists can say that the relativity principle is (ultimately) responsible for quantum entanglement.

And since there is no force used in this principle explanation, there are none of the “spooky actions at a distance” that Einstein derided.

With quantum entanglement’s technological implications for quantum computing firmly established, it’s nice to know that one big question about its origin may be answered with a highly regarded physics principle.

About the Author:

William Mark Stuckey, Professor of Physics, Elizabethtown College

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Opinions Programming

23 Aug

AUD/USD Sees Rebound: Weak US Dollar and RBA’s Steady Stance Support Strength

By RoboForex Analytical Department

AUD/USD is finding its footing, currently stabilising at around 0.6725, as the US dollar weakens further in anticipation of Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s speech at the Jackson Hole symposium.

The Australian dollar’s resilience is bolstered by the minutes from the Reserve Bank of Australia’s latest meeting, indicating that the central bank is not in a hurry to ease monetary policy despite a slowdown in inflation. The RBA remains cautious, projecting inflation to stay above its 2-3% target range until the end of 2025. This suggests that interest rates may remain steady for an extended period, providing a stable backdrop for the Australian dollar.

Recent data highlights robust performance in Australia’s private sector for August, particularly in services, while the contraction in manufacturing is easing. This paints a picture of an Australian economy that is adjusting well and could sustain its momentum without immediate monetary stimulus. Investors are watching closely for cues on future policy shifts, influencing forex forecasts.

Technical analysis of AUD/USD

The AUD/USD pair recently peaked at 0.6760 but is now poised for a correction. The immediate focus is on a potential descent to 0.6684, marking the first significant support level. Upon reaching this target, a retest of 0.6725 from below may occur, defining the boundaries of a possible consolidation range. A break below this consolidation could initiate a further decline towards 0.6600, potentially extending to 0.6555. The MACD indicator supports a bearish outlook in the short term, with the signal line peaking and poised for a downward trajectory.

In the hourly frame, AUD/USD has retraced from a recent low of 0.6696 to 0.6725, indicating a corrective phase. The anticipated continuation of this downtrend could see the pair targeting 0.6686 shortly. If this support holds, a rebound to 0.6725 could follow. The Stochastic oscillator indicates an overbought condition, with the signal line expected to move downwards from 80 to 20, supporting the potential for further declines.

Disclaimer

Any forecasts contained herein are based on the author’s particular opinion. This analysis may not be treated as trading advice. RoboForex bears no responsibility for trading results based on trading recommendations and reviews contained herein.

Financial News Forex and Currency News

23 Aug

The Bank of Japan is set to raise rates further. The Fed gov will speak at the annual symposium in Jackson Hole today

By JustMarkets

On Thursday, stocks in the US ended the session down. The Dow Jones Index (US30) was down 0.43%, while the S&P 500 Index (US500) fell by 0.88%. The NASDAQ Technology Index (US100) closed negative at 1.67% yesterday. The rise in bond yields on Thursday was negative for stocks. Hawkish comments from Kansas City Fed President Schmid pushed bond yields higher when he said he wanted to see more economic data before supporting any decision to cut interest rates, as demand could rise again if the Fed is not careful. On the other hand, Boston Fed President Colleen said she expects the Fed to begin easing interest rates soon and that a “gradual, methodical pace” of rate cuts would likely be appropriate. Also, Philadelphia Fed President Harker said that he is agreeable to an interest rate cut in September if data align with expectations and that a “slow, methodical approach to lowering rates is the right way to go.”

The US weekly initial jobless claims rose by 4,000 to 232,000, matching expectations. S&P’s US manufacturing PMI fell by 1.6 to 48.0, weaker than expectations of 49.5 and the lowest report in 8 months. US existing home sales for July rose by 1.3% m/m to 3.95 million, slightly stronger than expectations of 3.94 million. Today, markets await Fed Chair Powell’s opening comments at the Fed’s annual symposium in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, for new insights on the Fed’s future policy path. Powell is expected to indicate a willingness to cut rates in September but will not specify the exact timing or size of the cut. Markets rate the odds of a 25 bps rate cut at the September 17-18 FOMC meeting at 100% and a 50 bps rate cut at 25%.

Bitcoin has held its recent rise to above $60,000, hitting its highest levels in three weeks. However, recent data showed that bitcoin inventories held by miners reached the highest level in two years. An increase in bitcoin inventories held by miners has historically been associated with falling prices, suggesting that miners may be preparing to sell large amounts of bitcoin.

Equity markets in Europe mostly went up yesterday. Germany’s DAX (DE40) rose by 0.24%, France’s CAC 40 (FR40) closed down 0.01%, Spain’s IBEX 35 (ES35) added 0.37%, and the UK’s FTSE 100 (UK100) closed upv0.05%. The S&P Eurozone Manufacturing PMI for August from S&P fell by 0.2 to 45.6, weaker than expected. However, the Eurozone Composite PMI for August unexpectedly rose by 1.0 to 51.2, stronger than expectations for a decline to 50.1. The ECB reported that Eurozone wage growth fell to 3.6% y/y in Q2 from 4.7% y/y in Q1. The eurozone consumer confidence index unexpectedly fell by 0.4 to 13.4 in August, weaker than expectations of an increase to 12.6.

The ECB’s July 17-18 policy meeting summary states that “the September meeting was an appropriate time to reassess the level of monetary policy tightening, as new economic data and a new set of staff forecasts will emerge.” Swaps discount the odds of a 25 bps ECB rate cut at the September 12 meeting at 97%.

Asian markets were mostly up yesterday. Japan’s Nikkei 225 (JP225) rose by 0.68% yesterday, China’s FTSE China A50 (CHA50) added 0.35%, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng (HK50) gained 1.44% over yesterday and Australia’s ASX 200 (AU200) was positive 0.21%.

The Bank of Japan (BoJ) reiterated its commitment to raise interest rates if inflation steadily reaches its 2% target but realizes that markets at home and abroad remain volatile, BoJ Governor Kazuo Ueda told parliament on Friday. He added that the central bank continues to monitor market volatility following its decision to raise borrowing costs in July. Ueda emphasized that the BoJ’s stance on adjusting the degree of monetary policy easing has not changed.

Singapore’s annual inflation rate in July 2024 was 2.4%, unchanged from the previous month, the lowest since August 2021, and below market forecasts of 2.5%. The annualized core inflation rate fell to 2.5% from 2.9% in the previous month, the lowest since February 2022, and fell short of forecasts of 2.9%.

S&P 500 (US500) 5,570.64 −50.21 (−0.89%)

Dow Jones (US30) 40,712.78 −177.71 (−0.43%)

DAX (DE40) 18,493.39 +44.44 (+0.24%)

FTSE 100 (UK100) 8,288.00 +4.57 (+0.06%)

USD Index 101.52 +0.48 (+0.47%)

Important events today:

– New Zealand Retail Sales (q/q) at 01:45 (GMT+3);
– Japan National Core CPI (m/m) at 02:30 (GMT+3);
– Singapore Consumer Price Index (m/m) at 08:00 (GMT+3);
– Jackson Hole Symposium at 15:00 (GMT+3);
– Canada Retail Sales (m/m) at 15:30 (GMT+3);
– US Fed Chair Powell Speaks at 17:00 (GMT+3);
– US New Home Sales (m/m) at 17:00 (GMT+3);
– UK BoE Gov Bailey Speaks at 22:00 (GMT+3).

By JustMarkets

This article reflects a personal opinion and should not be interpreted as an investment advice, and/or offer, and/or a persistent request for carrying out financial transactions, and/or a guarantee, and/or a forecast of future events.

Economics & Fundamentals Financial News

23 Aug

Week Ahead: Nvidia earnings showdown could set market tone

By ForexTime

Nvidia shares ↑150% year-to-date

Data center business and Q3 guidance in focus

Shares could move 10.4% ↑ or ↓ post earnings

Prices edging higher on H1 but RSI near oversold

Technical levels – $130, $119, 200 SMA and $110

Financial markets may end August with a bang thanks to key data and high-impact events.

Earnings from tech titan Nvidia and the Fed’s preferred inflation gauge have the potential to set the tone for the new trading month:

Monday, 26th Aug

GER40: Germany IFO business climate
NGN: Nigeria GDP
SG20: Singapore industrial production
US500: US durable goods

Tuesday, 27th Aug

CN50: China industrial profits
GER40: Germany GDP
AU200: BHP, Woodside Energy earnings
US30: US Conference Board consumer confidence

Wednesday 28th Aug

AU200: Australia CPI
NAS100: Nvidia earnings
USDInd: Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic speech

Thursday, 29th Aug

EU50: Eurozone consumer confidence
GER40: Germany CPI
SEK: Sweden GDP
US500: US GDP, initial jobless claims, Fed speak

Friday, 30th Aug

CHINAH: ICBC (China’s largest commercial bank) earnings
CAD: Canada GDP
EU50: Eurozone CPI, German unemployment
JP225: Japan unemployment, Tokyo CPI, industrial production, retail sales
US500: US PCE report, University of Michigan consumer sentiment

The end of earnings season is near, and Nvidia now comes into sharp focus, after mostly disappointing results from the so-called Magnificent Seven.

When considering Nvidia’s central role in the AI boom, its upcoming earnings have the potential to shape market sentiment with investors undoubtedly looking for another round of outstanding results.

Fun fact: Nvidia shares are up roughly 150% since the start of 2024

When will earnings be published

Nvidia reports its earnings for the second quarter of its 2025 fiscal year after US markets close on Wednesday 28th August.

Market expectations

The tech giant is forecast to post earnings per share of $0.65 compared to $0.27 a year ago.

Quarterly revenues are expected to rise $28.7 billion from $13.5 billion in the prior year – representing a 112.6% increase.

Investors will also be paying close attention to the data center segment and whether earning guidance is raised for Q3.

As highlighted earlier, there is little room for error with exceptional results needed to justify its whopping $3 trillion valuation.

Potential challenges

Concerns over the Blackwell chip delay potentially weighing on the business outlook.

Increasing competition from the likes of AMD and Intel which are investing in their own AI chips.

Potential US bans hitting demand for Nvidia chips in China

How will Nvidia shares react to earnings

Markets are forecasting a 10.4% move, either Up or Down, for Nvidia stocks on Thursday post earnings.

This is equivalent to a move of roughly $300 billion, bigger than the entire market cap of many large companies in the S&P500 and Nasdaq 100.

How will wider markets be influenced?

Over the past 12 months, the Nasdaq 100 has shown a 74% positive correlation with Nvidia shares.

But more interestingly, over a rolling 5-day from the past 10 years:

US500: +97%

UK100: +53%

Intel Corp: +95%

Broadcom: +99%

Advanced Micro Devices: +90%

What does this mean?

Given how some US and European equities are trading near all-time highs, a positive set of results from Nvidia could mean fresh upside gains – opening the doors to more records.

Technical forces

Prices may continue to consolidate within a range until the earnings are published.

Still, Nvidia stocks have been trending higher on the H1 charts with prices above the 100 and 200- SMA. But weakness below the 50 SMA could signal a decline toward the 119.00 support regions. Keep an eye on the Relative Strength Index (RSI) index is edging towards oversold levels.

Key levels of interest can be found at $130, 119, 200 SMA and $110.

Article by ForexTime

ForexTime Ltd (FXTM) is an award winning international online forex broker regulated by CySEC 185/12 www.forextime.com

Opinions Stock Market News

23 Aug

Banana apocalypse, part 2 – a genomicist explains the tricky genetics of the fungus devastating bananas worldwide

By Li-Jun Ma, UMass Amherst

Did you know that the bananas you eat today are not the same type as the ones people were eating a few generations ago? The banana you might have had with your breakfast today is a variety called the Cavendish banana, while the one that was in grocery stores up to the 1950s was a variety called Gros Michel, which was wiped out by a disease called Fusarium wilt of banana, or FWB.

FWB of Gros Michel was caused by Fusarium oxysporum race 1, a fungal pathogen that affects bananas. This fungal infection kills a plant by occupying its vascular system, blocking water and mineral transportation.

Plant biologists developed the Fusarium-resistant Cavendish variety to replace the Gros Michel. Yet, over the past few decades, a resurgence of FWB caused by a different strain of the same fungus called tropical race 4, or TR4, is once again threatening global banana production.

How did Fusarium oxysporum gain the ability to overcome resistance and infect so many different plants?

The two-part genome of F. oxysporum

I am a genomicist who has spent the past decade studying the genetic evolution of Fusarium oxysporum. As a species complex, F. oxysporum can cause wilt and root rot diseases in over 120 plant species. Certain strains can also infect people.

In 2010, my lab discovered that each F. oxysporum genome can be divided into two parts: a core genome shared among all strains that codes for essential housekeeping functions, and an accessory genome varying from strain to strain that codes for specialized functions like the ability to infect a specific plant host.

Each species of plant has a sophisticated immune response to defend against microbial invasion. So to establish an infection, each F. oxysporum strain uses its accessory genome to suppress a plant’s unique defense system. This functional compartmentalization allows F. oxysporum to greatly increase its host range.

Petri dish with four red, oblong colonies crowing on separate corners — The genomic structure of *Fusarium oxysporum* allows it to have a wide range of hosts, such as tomatoes, cucumbers and watermelon.
Edward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Bugwood.org, CC BY-SA

In our newly published research, my team and colleagues in China and South Africa found that the TR4 strain that kills Cavendish bananas has a different evolutionary origin and different sequences in its accessory genome compared with the strain that killed Gros Michel bananas.

Looking at the interface of where the TR4 strain is battling with its Cavendish banana host, we found that some of its activated accessory genes release nitric oxide, a gas harmful to the Cavendish banana. This sudden burst of toxic gases facilitates infection by disarming the plant’s defense system. At the same time, the fungus protects itself by increasing production of chemicals that detoxify nitric oxide.

Increasing banana diversity

In tracing the global spread of this new version of Fusarium oxysporum, we realized that a major cause for the recent resurgence of this fungal infection is the domination of the international banana industry by a single clone of banana.

Growing different varieties of bananas can make agriculture more sustainable and reduce disease pressure on a single crop. Farmers and researchers can control Fusarium wilt of banana by identifying or developing banana varieties that are tolerant or resistant to TR4. Our findings suggest that another way to protect Cavendish bananas would be to design effective nitric oxide scavengers to reduce the toxic pressure of the gas burst.

The banana industry has dark origins.

It can be hard to imagine how a consumer who simply enjoys eating bananas could participate in the battle against the disease devastating banana crops. However, consumers determine the market, and farmers are forced to grow what the market demands.

You can help increase banana diversity in your supermarket by intentionally trying one or more of the other hundreds of other existing banana varieties when they show up there. You can also buy local varieties of other fruits and agricultural products to help preserve plant diversity and support local growers.

Collaboration among scientists, farmers, industry and consumers around the world can help avoid future shortages of bananas and other crops.

About the Author:

Li-Jun Ma, Professor of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, UMass Amherst

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Economics & Fundamentals Opinions

22 Aug

Thailand’s democracy has taken another hit, but the country’s progressive forces won’t be stopped

By Adam Simpson, University of South Australia

After two tumultuous weeks in Thai politics, the country has a new prime minister and new opposition party in parliament. The sweeping changes have demonstrated yet again the power of the Constitutional Court over Thailand’s fragile democratic institutions.

The political intrigue began on August 7 when the court dissolved the progressive Move Forward Party, the main opposition party in parliament following its surprising showing in the 2023 national elections.

Two days later, the party reconstituted itself as the People’s Party and announced it would continue to lead the opposition.

Then, on August 14, the Constitutional Court disqualified Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin of the Pheu Thai party from holding the post, and removed him from office.

And two days after that decision, the parliament duly elected Pheu Thai leader Paetongtarn Shinawatra as his replacement. She is the third member of her family to serve as prime minister after her father, Thaksin Shinawatra (2001–06), and aunt, Yingluck Shinawatra (2011–14).

Unfortunately, these kinds of incidents have become normalised in Thailand. They demonstrate the extent to which conservative forces in the country continue to use various tools of “lawfare”, including the Constitutional Court, to target opposition politicians and parties and stifle the will of the people.

Despite these setbacks to Thailand’s democracy, the country is changing fast. It is becoming more progressive and less submissive to military and monarchy authority.

So, these latest manoeuvres by the country’s gerontocracy may not be a show of strength after all. Rather, as one Thai politics expert put it, these moves may be the “last gasp” of the conservative old guard that has long dominated Thai politics and society.

Revolving door of prime ministers

Over the last two decades, five prime ministers from the Pheu Thai party and its predecessors have been forced from office.

Thaksin Shinawatra was removed in a military coup in September 2006 and his party was later dissolved by the Constitutional Court.

Yingluck Shinatwatra led another successor party to a win at the 2011 elections, but she, too, was removed from power by the Constitutional Court in 2014, followed by another military coup.

With Paetongtarn Shinawatra’s elevation to prime minister last week, the powerful Shinawatra family has made a stunning return to the top of Thai politics. However, this may not be quite the triumphant re-establishment of a family political dynasty that Thaksin Shinawatra expects.

Paetongtarn Shinawatra is just 37 years old and inexperienced. And despite the fact the economy showed some growth in the first quarter of this year, her government faces significant economic challenges, such as high levels of household and corporate debt and an economic slowdown in the US and China.

Thaksin Shinawatra also remains in the cross-hairs of the conservative military establishment. After spending 15 years in self-imposed exile to avoid facing charges he contends were politically motivated, he returned to Thailand last year after Pheu Thai took power.

He was then indicted in June for allegedly insulting the monarchy during a media interview in 2015.

Another new progressive party dissolved

Perhaps the more concerning development in recent days, however, was the Constitutional Court’s decision to dissolve the progressive Move Forward party, which had won the most seats in parliament in last year’s election.

Progressive politicians have fallen afoul of the court a number of times in recent years.

In the 2019 elections, for example, Future Forward, a brand new progressive political party led by a young, charismatic politician, Thanathorn Juangroongruangkit, stunned observers by winning 80 seats. The court, however, soon disqualified Thanathorn from parliament and dissolved the party.

The party reconstituted itself as Move Forward under the leadership of another young leader, Pita Limjaroenrat, and it did even better in the 2023 elections, winning 151 seats in the House of Representatives.

The court, however, suspended Pita and dissolved his party over its attempts to reform the anti-democratic lese majeste law. It also banned the party’s leadership, including Pita, from politics for ten years.

The party’s remaining MPs will be able to stay in parliament under the banner of the People’s Party, though nearly 40 are now under investigation for alleged ethics violations, including its new leader, Natthaphong Ruengpanyawut.

What does this mean for Thai democracy?

There now appear to be three distinct centres of political power in Thailand:

Thaksin Shinawatra and the Pheu Thai party
the military-monarchy complex and their associated parties
the new progressive People’s Party.

While Pita warned against the continued use of “lawfare” to muzzle the opposition in an essay for The Economist earlier this month, there is some room for optimism.

It appears much of the population has moved on from the nepotism and rampant self-interest that has long defined Thai politics. According to a recent poll, nearly half of respondents said their preferred prime minister would be Pita (47%), while Paetongtarn was favoured by just 10.5% and Srettha just 8.7%.

The People’s Party is also offering a much more democratic vision for Thailand, based on integrity and reforming the lese majeste law. (Its leader, Natthaphong, has acknowledged, though, that the party must now “think carefully about how to amend it”.)

The party’s electoral march towards government looks difficult to stop. It’s likely Move Forward’s win in the 2023 election will turn into a landslide for the People’s Party at the next election.

The historical obedience and submission to the monarchy and military in Thai society is gradually being whittled away, as older, conservative voters are being replaced by those who want a more democratic and responsive government.

In recent years, there has also been some improvement in Thailand for personal freedoms — notably the legalisation of same-sex marriage and cannabis. The pressure to expand and consolidate basic political freedoms within a multi-party democracy will only increase.

Thailand is not an authoritarian regime – unlike its neighbours Myanmar and Laos – and at some point in the not-too-distant future, the rapidly changing Thai society may well force the military-monarchy complex to cede power for good.

About the Author:

Adam Simpson, Senior Lecturer, International Studies, University of South Australia

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Economics & Fundamentals Opinions

22 Aug

The dovish FOMC minutes supported the growth of indices. The Australian index has been growing for 10 consecutive trading sessions

By JustMarkets

Stocks in the US ended the session higher on Wednesday. The Dow Jones Index (US30) rose by 0.14%, while the S&P 500 Index (US500) gained 0.42%. The NASDAQ Technology Index (US100) closed positive, 0.57% yesterday. Stocks rose on Wednesday after a significant downward revision to US payrolls data and a dovish FOMC meeting minutes from July 30-31 drove bond yields lower and reinforced the likelihood that the Fed will cut interest rates next month. The minutes from the July 30-31 FOMC meeting said that “a few” officials considered cutting interest rates at the July meeting, but the “overwhelming majority” of officials thought a rate cut in September was likely. Markets now await Fed Chairman Powell’s opening comments on Friday at the Fed’s annual symposium in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, for more clues about the Fed’s future policy path.

The US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) revised the US employment numbers for the year to March downward by 818,000, stronger than expectations of 600,000 and the largest downward revision since 2009. The report was dovish for Fed policy, pointing to a weaker US labor market than initially reported.

Equity markets in Europe mostly went up yesterday. Germany’s DAX (DE40) rose by 0.50%, France’s CAC 40 (FR40) closed 0.52% higher, Spain’s IBEX 35 (ES35) gained 0.24%, and the UK’s FTSE 100 (UK100) closed up 0.12%.

WTI crude oil prices fell by 1.7% to $71.9 per barrel on Wednesday, settling at their lowest level since January, as investors reacted to the latest Federal Reserve meeting minutes and a significant downward revision to estimates of US job growth. Oil declined despite a drop in US crude inventories, which fell by 4.6 million barrels in the week ended August 16, exceeding analysts’ expectations. In addition, concerns over economic weakness in China could reduce the demand for crude oil and put further pressure on oil prices.

Asian markets traded yesterday without any unified dynamics. Japan’s Nikkei 225 (JP225) fell by 0.29%, China’s FTSE China A50 (CHA50) was down 0.17%, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng (HK50) lost -0.69% over yesterday, while Australia’s ASX 200 (AU200) was positive 0.16%.

The ASX 200 Index (AU200) gained 0.21%, extending its winning streak to a tenth session, as good Australian business activity data boosted market sentiment. Australia’s composite PMI rose to 51.4 in August from 49.9 in July. This is the fastest rise in three months, driven by a pickup in service sector activity despite a deeper contraction in manufacturing output.

Malaysia’s annual inflation rate for July 2024 stood at 2.0%, just below market expectations of 2.1%, and unchanged for the third consecutive month. The reading remained at its highest level since August 2023, with prices continuing to rise for food (1.6% vs. 2.0% in June), alcoholic beverages and tobacco (0.9% vs. 0.7%), and housing (3.2% vs. 3.2%). Core consumer prices, excluding volatile fresh food prices and administrative costs, rose 1.9% y/y in June, holding steady for a fourth month and remaining at the highest level since December 2023.

Au Jibun Bank’s Japan Manufacturing PMI rose to 49.5 in August 2024 from a four-month low of 49.1 in the previous month, compared with the market forecast of 49.8. Preliminary estimates showed a second consecutive month of contraction in factory activity. It also marked the sixth consecutive month of contraction in the manufacturing sector this year, driven by a further decline in new orders.

As expected, the Bank of Korea kept the benchmark rate unchanged at 3.5% for the 13th time at its August meeting. The decision came amid conflicting economic signals, with inflation falling but household debt rising and housing prices soaring after recent government measures. The council noted that short-term inflation expectations have fallen to the upper end of the 2% range. Meanwhile, this year, consumer inflation could reach the lower end of the 2% range, with an annualized rate of 2.5%.

S&P 500 (US500) 5,620.85 +23.73 (+0.42%)

Dow Jones (US30) 40,890.49 +55.52 (+0.14%)

DAX (DE40) 18,448.95 +91.43 (+0.50%)

FTSE 100 (UK100) 8,283.43 +10.11 (+0.12%)

USD index 101.16 −0.28 (−0.28%)

Important events today:

– Australia Manufacturing PMI (m/m) at 02:00 (GMT+3);
– Australia Services PMI (m/m) at 02:00 (GMT+3);
– Japan Manufacturing PMI (m/m) at 03:30 (GMT+3);
– Japan Services PMI (m/m) at 03:30 (GMT+3);
– German Manufacturing PMI (m/m) at 10:30 (GMT+3);
– German Services PMI (m/m) at 10:30 (GMT+3);
– Eurozone Manufacturing PMI (m/m) at 11:00 (GMT+3);
– Eurozone Services PMI (m/m) at 11:00 (GMT+3);
– UK Manufacturing PMI (m/m) at 11:30 (GMT+3);
– UK Services PMI (m/m) at 11:30 (GMT+3);
– Jackson Hole Symposium at 15:00 (GMT+3);
– US Initial Jobless Claims (w/w) at 15:30 (GMT+3);
– US Manufacturing PMI (m/m) at 16:45 (GMT+3);
– US Services PMI (m/m) at 16:45 (GMT+3);
– US Existing Home Sales (m/m) at 17:00 (GMT+3);
– US Natural Gas Storage (w/w) at 17:30 (GMT+3).

By JustMarkets

Economics & Fundamentals Financial News

Risk Disclosure: Foreign Currency trading and trading on margin carries a high level of risk and can result in loss of part or all of your investment. Due to the level of risk and market volatility, Foreign Currency trading may not be suitable for all investors and you should not invest money you cannot afford to lose. Before deciding to invest in the foreign currency exchange market you should carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite. You should be aware of all the risks associated with foreign currency exchange trading, and seek advice from an independent financial advisor should you have any doubts.

All information and opinions on this website are for general informational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice.