Golden Opportunity for These 3 Mining Stocks

By Ino.com

It’s been a tough year for investors in the Gold Miners Index (GDX), with the ETF shedding 38% of its value since its April highs.

It’s been a tough year for investors, with the ETF shedding more than 45% from its multi-year highs. A gold price decline exacerbated this tumble. For the weakest producers, this is a concern.

While this has led to many investors steering clear of the sector, some miners are now at their lowest multiples since the 2015 bear market bottom, when margins were half what they are today. Many miners were carrying considerable amounts of debt.

Today, this same group of producers will enter Q4 2022 in net cash positions, are paying out dividends double that of the S&P-500 (SPY), and are much more disciplined, learning from past mistakes. To summarize, I see this as a rare opportunity to buy a few high-quality businesses.

Let’s take a look at three stand-out names below:

Agnico Eagle (AEM)

Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM) is the world’s 3rd largest gold producer, on track to produce approximately 3.3MM ounces of gold this year. This significant growth from ~2.0MM ounces in 2021 is related to the merger of equals with Kirkland Lake Gold (KL), which saw the company add three of the world’s most profitable mines to its portfolio (now 11 mines total).

Notably, the company did not sacrifice from a jurisdictional safety standpoint when considering this transaction, adding three mines in two of the most attractive jurisdictions globally: Canada and Australia.

Normally, the large producers do not make great investments. This is because they struggle to grow production and reserves per share. The lack of growth is not their fault and is not due to poor management.

Instead, it’s because major discoveries are becoming rarer, and their size makes it hard to grow organically, with 100,000 – 200,000 ounce per annum operations not really moving the needle.

However, AEM is in a unique situation, having multiple opportunities to grow production within its portfolio and four development projects in the wings where it could also grow production. So, if the company can execute successfully, it could see production increase to 4.5MM ounces per annum by 2029.

AEM’s potential for a 35% production growth rate (2029 vs. 2022) means that it should be able to grow cash flow and earnings per share each year regardless of whether the gold price chooses to cooperate or not, a key differentiator.

Meanwhile, its operating costs should average $950/oz (2023-2026), making it one of the few producers that could withstand a drop to $1,400/oz in the gold price.

Despite this unique position, the stock is trading at its lowest levels since 2015, at a valuation reserved for a producer with a weak balance sheet and slim margins. This is not the case at all, though, with AEM set to end the year in a net cash position and being one of the highest-margin producers sector-wide.

AEM Chart

(Source: FASTGraphs.com)
 

As shown above, AEM has historically traded at 26x cash flow and currently trades at less than 7x FY2022 cash flow estimates.

Even if we use a more conservative multiple of 13x cash flow, a 50% discount to the historical multiple, AEM would command a valuation of $78.00 per share, which also assumes more conservative cash flow per share estimates ($6.00 per share). Hence, I see this pullback in the stock as a gift, with it rarely ever being this cheap over the past decade.

Kinross Gold (KGC)

Kinross Gold (KGC) is a mid-cap gold producer with multiple mines in the Americas, as well as the massive Tasiast Mine in Mauritania.

Like Agnico, Kinross has been punished over the past year and is down a whopping 70% from its highs. This under-performance is partially due to having to sell its Russian assets in a 50% off sale following the invasion of Ukraine.

Although this padded the company’s balance sheet with $300MM in cash and an additional $200MM from its Chirano Mine sale, it put a severe dent in what Kinross was touting as a growth profile post-2022 (400,000 fewer ounces of annual production related to its sales).

While this is a downgrade from the previous investment thesis (20%+ growth at slightly lower costs), the sell-off in the stock looks to be overdone. This is because with Kinross shedding its Russian exposure, it should be able to command a P/NAV and cash flow multiple that’s closer to that of its peer group vs. the discounted valuation it was stuck with previously.

So, even though Kinross has seen a $1.1 billion decline in net asset value [NAV] from its sales, it will be partially made up for with an increase in its P/NAV multiple.

In addition, the company is now a lot more attractive to prospective investors (aside from its lacking growth), with more than half of future production coming from Tier-1 jurisdictions (United States, Canada, Chile).

KGC Chart

(Source: FASTGraphs.com)
 

Looking at the chart above, we can see that KGC has historically traded at 11x cash flow, but its 10-year average has been closer to 6x cash flow. Currently, the stock trades at just 3.25x FY2022 cash flow estimates, and this assumes that cash flow per share comes in at just $1.00.

So, while there are certainly more attractive names out there to own, given Kinross’ mediocre long-term track record, this is an opportunity to buy a decent business at a very attractive price. To summarize, I see this pullback below $3.30 as a rare buying opportunity, and I would not be surprised to see the stock trade above $5.00 in the next 12 months.

Eldorado Gold (EGO)

The final name worth keeping an eye on is Eldorado Gold (EGO), a much riskier and more speculative name given that it’s a smaller producer in some less favorable jurisdictions (Greece, Turkey).

However, the stock is now down more than 50% from its highs and trading at one of its cheapest valuations in years. Based on FY2022 guidance, Eldorado Gold expects to produce over 450,000 ounces of gold, with the potential to grow production to more than 500,000 ounces at sub $1,100/oz costs by 2025. This base case scenario is not all that attractive, even if Eldorado is very reasonably valued at just ~3.0x FY2022 cash flow estimates.

However, in addition to its current operating portfolio, Eldorado owns the Skouries gold-copper Project in Greece, a mine capable of producing more than 160,000 ounces of gold per annum between 2025-2035. While this isn’t that significant of a production profile, the cost profile will be industry-leading, with all-in sustaining costs after by-product credits expected to come in at less than $100/oz.

This would help Eldorado to transform itself from a 450,000-ounce per annum producer at $1,100/oz costs to a ~650,000-ounce per annum producer at sub $900/oz costs, which should lead to a re-rating in the stock. So, with the stock down over 55% from its highs just four months ago, this violent correction looks like a buying opportunity. However, this is not a stock for risk-averse investors, given its sub $1.2BB market cap.

Once every few years, a fat pitch arrives in the gold sector, offering an opportunity to invest in gold miners that are trading at levels where they could potentially double over the next two years. This opportunity looks to have arisen, and AEM looks like the lowest-risk way to play this opportunity at $40.00 per share.

Disclosure: I am long AEM, KGC, GLD

Taylor Dart
INO.com Contributor

Disclaimer: This article is the opinion of the contributor themselves. Taylor Dart is not a Registered Investment Advisor or Financial Planner. This writing is for informational purposes only. It does not constitute an offer to sell, a solicitation to buy, or a recommendation regarding any securities transaction. The information contained in this writing should not be construed as financial or investment advice on any subject matter. Taylor Dart expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken based on any or all of the information in this writing. Given the volatility in the precious metals sector, position sizing is critical, so when buying small-cap precious metals stocks, position sizes should be limited to 5% or less of one’s portfolio.

By Ino.com – See our Trader Blog, INO TV Free & Market Analysis Alerts

Source: Golden Opportunity for These 3 Mining Stocks

The Analytical Overview of the Main Currency Pairs on 2022.07.27

By JustForex

The EUR/USD currency pair

Technical indicators of the currency pair:
  • Prev Open: 1.0215
  • Prev Close: 1.0117
  • % chg. over the last day: -0.96%

TOn Tuesday, the dollar rose against a basket of major currencies ahead of an important US Federal Reserve meeting. At the same time, concerns about the possibility of another reduction in Russian gas supplies put pressure on the euro. Hedge fund EDL Capital is betting that the euro will fall to 80 cents to the dollar as rampant inflation fuels volatility in politics and bond markets, which could test the region’s unity. The EDL founder points out that risks related to Russian gas supplies will lead to record inflation in Europe, causing aggressive rate hikes during the recession and forcing Germany to potentially forego the cost of maintaining Eurozone unity.

Trading recommendations
  • Support levels: 1.0120, 1.0035, 1.0000
  • Resistance levels: 1.0171, 1.0202, 1.0250, 1.0284, 1.0365, 1.0415, 1.050

From the technical point of view, the trend on the EUR/USD currency pair on the hourly time frame is bullish. The price is forming a wide balance, but there is seller pressure. The MACD indicator has become negative. Under such market conditions, it is best to look for buy trades on intraday time frames from the support level of 1.0120, but only with confirmation. Sell trades can be considered from the resistance level of 1.0171 or 1.0202, but only after additional confirmation and only with short targets.

Alternative scenario: if the price breaks down through the 1.0035 support level and fixes below, the downtrend will likely resume.

EUR/USD
News feed for 2022.07.27:
  • – US Core Durable Goods Orders (m/m) at 15:30 (GMT+3);
  • – US Pending Home Sales (m/m) at 17:00 (GMT+3);
  • – US Crude Oil Reserves (w/w) at 17:30 (GMT+3);
  • – US FOMC Statement at 21:00 (GMT+3);
  • – US Fed Interest Rate Decision at 21:00 (GMT+3);
  • – US FOMC Press Conference at 21:30 (GMT+3).

The GBP/USD currency pair

Technical indicators of the currency pair:
  • Prev Open: 1.2035
  • Prev Close: 1.2025
  • % chg. over the last day: -0.08%

On Tuesday, the pound sterling hit a two-week high as analysts assessed the prospect of a 50 basis point rate hike by the Bank of England amid a deteriorating economic outlook. But there is also the other side. The worsening economic outlook will pressure the Bank of England to take a less hawkish stance. A Reuters poll of economists indicates that the Bank of England will stick to a gradual 0.25% hike. Currently, the interest rate differential between the US Fed and the Bank of England is in favor of lower GBP/USD quotes.

Trading recommendations
  • Support levels: 1.2027, 1.1907, 1.1803
  • Resistance levels: 1.2056, 1.2085, 1.2137

From the technical point of view, the trend on the GBP/USD currency pair on the hourly time frame is bullish. Buyers’ pressure remains, but there was a false break out of yesterday’s highs. The MACD indicator shows signs of divergence. Under such market conditions, buy trades are best to look at intraday time frames from the support level of 1.2027, but only with confirmation. Sell trades can be considered from the resistance level of 1.2056, but only after additional confirmation and with short targets.

Alternative scenario: if the price breaks down through the 1.1907 support level and fixes below, the downtrend will likely resume.

GBP/USD
News feed for 2022.07.27:
  • – US FOMC Statement at 21:00 (GMT+3);
  • – US Fed Interest Rate Decision at 21:00 (GMT+3);
  • – US FOMC Press Conference at 21:30 (GMT+3).

The USD/JPY currency pair

Technical indicators of the currency pair:
  • Prev Open: 136.65
  • Prev Close: 136.92
  • % chg. over the last day: +0.20%

The US Federal Reserve will raise rates by 0.75-1% today, further widening the gap between the US and Japanese central banks. For the Japanese yen, fundamentally, there is no reason to strengthen right now, as the Bank of Japan is still sticking to its soft monetary policy and is not going to take a hawkish stance anytime soon.

Trading recommendations
  • Support levels: 136.70, 135.99, 135.40, 134.64, 134.11
  • Resistance levels: 137.26, 137.81, 138.25, 138.56, 140.29

From the technical point of view, the medium-term trend on the USD/JPY currency pair is bearish. Any fundamental factors do not accompany the fall in the USD/JPY quotes, so traders should be careful. The price is now trading between the moving averages. The MACD indicator has become positive. Under such market conditions, buy trades can be searched for intraday from the support level of 136.70, but with additional confirmation. For sell deals, traders can consider the resistance level of 137.26 or 137.81, but only with additional confirmation and short targets.

Alternative scenario: If the price fixes above 138.25, the uptrend will likely resume.

USD/JPY
News feed for 2022.07.27:
  • – US FOMC Statement at 21:00 (GMT+3);
  • – US Fed Interest Rate Decision at 21:00 (GMT+3);
  • – US FOMC Press Conference at 21:30 (GMT+3).

The USD/CAD currency pair

Technical indicators of the currency pair:
  • Prev Open: 1.2845
  • Prev Close: 1.2883
  • % chg. over the last day: +0.29%

The Canadian dollar is a commodity currency highly dependent on the US Dollar Index and oil prices. The US Dollar Index got stronger yesterday in anticipation of the Fed meeting on the interest rate, and oil, on the contrary, went down as the United States is selling more reserves amid the worsening of the economic statistics. As a result, the USD/CAD quotes increased. It should be noted that after the US Fed rate hike of 0.75%, the central banks of the US and Canada will have rates at the same level. Therefore, traders should expect a wide sideways movement on this currency pair without any single dynamics in the coming weeks.

Trading recommendations
  • Support levels: 1.2840, 1.2781
  • Resistance levels: 1.2912, 1.3006, 1.3085, 1.3154

In terms of technical analysis, the trend on the USD/CAD currency pair is bearish. At the moment, the price is forming a wide balance and is trading at the levels of the moving lines. The MACD indicator has become inactive again. Under such market conditions, it is best to consider sell deals from the resistance level of 1.2912, but with confirmation. Buy trades should be considered on the lower time frames from the support level 1.2840, but only with confirmation and short targets.

Alternative scenario: if the price breaks out and consolidates above the 1.3006 resistance level, the uptrend will likely be resume.

USD/CAD
News feed for 2022.07.27:
  • – US Crude Oil Reserves (w/w) at 17:30 (GMT+3);
  • – US FOMC Statement at 21:00 (GMT+3);
  • – US Fed Interest Rate Decision at 21:00 (GMT+3);
  • – US FOMC Press Conference at 21:30 (GMT+3).

By JustForex

 

This article reflects a personal opinion and should not be interpreted as an investment advice, and/or offer, and/or a persistent request for carrying out financial transactions, and/or a guarantee, and/or a forecast of future events.

US economic indicators worsen, but reporting season keeps indices from falling

By JustForex

US consumer confidence fell in July for the third month in a row, indicating a slowdown in growth early in the third quarter. The index was negative, with values worse than economists’ estimates. New home sales in the US fell just over 8% in June from a month earlier and were down double digits from a year earlier, suggesting a weakening housing market due to the rise in mortgages. As the stock market closed yesterday, the Dow Jones Index (US30) decreased by 0.71%, and the S&P 500 Index (US500) lost 1.15%. The NASDAQ Technology Index (US100) gained 0.59% yesterday.

The Fed is having its monetary policy meeting today, where the US central bank will once again raise interest rates. The market has a 77.5% chance of a 75bp hike and a 22.5% chance of a 100bp increase. The Fed is not likely to go against the market, so there is a 0.75% chance of a rate hike. But it is also necessary to be prepared for surprises. The main focus of the market will also be concentrated on the speech of the head of the Fed – Jerome Powell. Mr. Powell will talk about the Fed plans for the future, which will be the basis for the key assets pricing.

Such companies as Meta Platforms (META), T-Mobile US (TMUS), Qualcomm (QCOM), Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMY), Boeing (BA), ADP (ADP), Airbus Group NV (EADSY), Ford Motor (F), Shopify Inc (SHOP) and others will report today. Deutsche Bank analysts said weak Q2 company reports are already “priced in,” so there is a high probability that the market will rise on the publication facts. Optimistic reports from Alphabet (GOOGL) and Microsoft (MSFT) eased investor fears about the bleak economic outlook. More than three-quarters of the firms that have reported earnings so far have either beaten expectations or met them, providing some hope for investors.

Equity markets in Europe were mainly down yesterday. Germany’s DAX (DE30) decreased by 0.86% on Tuesday, France’s CAC 40 (FR 40) lost 0.42%, Spain’s IBEX 35 (ES35) fell by 0.20%, and the British FTSE 100 (UK100) closed at its opening price.

On Monday, Russian energy giant Gazprom, citing instructions from the industry regulator, said that gas flows to Germany through the Nord Stream 1 pipeline will be reduced to 33 million cubic meters per day starting Wednesday, or half of the current flow which was already only 40%. The EDL founder points out that risks associated with Russian gas supplies will lead to record inflation in Europe, causing rates to rise aggressively during the recession.

Oil is getting cheaper as the US sells more reserves amid worsening economic statistics. The White House said it had released about 125 million barrels to make up for a global oil supply shortfall and a spike in fuel prices, which intensified after Russia invaded Ukraine in February.

Asian markets traded flat yesterday. Japan’s Nikkei 225 (JP225) fell by 0.16%, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng (HK50) added 1.67%, and Australia’s S&P/ASX 200 (AU200) was up 0.26% on the day. Global Central Bank rate hikes, the war in Ukraine, and sluggish prospects for the Chinese economy are all putting pressure on investor sentiment in the region.

Australia’s Consumer Price Index increased to 6.1% in annual terms. Inflation rose by 1.8% in the last quarter but was below economists’ forecasts. The rise in inflation is mainly due to higher housing costs and automobile fuel prices. Average annual trimmed inflation, which excludes significant price rises and falls, increased by 4.9%, the highest since 2003. New home prices recorded their largest increase since 1999. The price increases continue to be driven by high construction rates combined with persistent shortages of materials and labor. Fuel prices rose for the eighth consecutive quarter.

US President Joe Biden is scheduled to speak with Chinese President Xi Jinping this Thursday about tensions over Taiwan.

S&P 500 (F) (US500) 3,921.05 −45.79 (−1.15%)

Dow Jones (US30) 31,761.54 −228.50 (−0.71%)

DAX (DE40) 13,096.93 −113.39 (−0.86%)

FTSE 100 (UK100) 7,306.28 −0.020 (−0.003%)

USD Index 107.22 +0.73 (+0.69%)

Important events for today:
  • – Australia Consumer Price Index (m/m) at 04:30 (GMT+3);
  • – US Core Durable Goods Orders (m/m) at 15:30 (GMT+3);
  • – US Pending Home Sales (m/m) at 17:00 (GMT+3);
  • – US Crude Oil Reserves (w/w) at 17:30 (GMT+3);
  • – US FOMC Statement at 21:00 (GMT+3);
  • – US Fed Interest Rate Decision at 21:00 (GMT+3);
  • – US FOMC Press Conference at 21:30 (GMT+3).

By JustForex

 

This article reflects a personal opinion and should not be interpreted as an investment advice, and/or offer, and/or a persistent request for carrying out financial transactions, and/or a guarantee, and/or a forecast of future events.

Tech firms face more regulation after moves to stop ‘killer’ acquisitions – but innovation could also be under threat

By Renaud Foucart, Lancaster University 

One way to eliminate the competition in business is simply to buy them out and shut them down. And that means less choice for consumers and sometimes the loss of innovative and, in the case of the pharmaceutical industry, even life-saving products. But such so-called killer acquisitions are likely to face greater scrutiny in the US and EU following a recent expansion of competition regulators’ powers.

A July 2022 decision by the European Court of Justice has expanded the European Commission’s ability to investigate a wider range of mergers and acquisitions (M&A). And last year, the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) also changed its criteria for scrutinising certain deal types.

Historically, these regulators have only been empowered to examine business deals of a certain size, mostly between potential direct competitors. These recent rulings will empower them to examine almost any purchase.

When applying these new powers to fast-moving industries such as pharma or technology, however, regulators must navigate a world of costly and risky investments in research and development. It’s very difficult for regulators to spot a killer acquisition before it happens, and many M&A deals can actually benefit consumers. So calling it wrong could actually stifle innovation and stop new products from reaching the market.

US and EU regulators share the same fear: if dominant players are allowed to buy up start-ups, this could impact innovation and market concentration, depriving consumers of the benefit of new products and technology. In its announcement about its new approach, the FTC said “several decades” of consolidation across the economy has corresponded with a “lessening of competition reflected in growing mark-ups and shrinking wages”.

There is research to support this view. Similarly, EU regulators want to be able to investigate – and potentially prevent – any acquisitions they believe may hurt consumers.

Killer acquisitions

When competition regulators try to ensure that established firms buying small innovative players don’t hinder or even destroy innovation, killer acquisitions are one of their top concerns. As documented in an influential economic paper on the pharmaceutical industry, the goal of the dominant firm in such a deal is to destroy a potential competitor to its own business, even if it means patients never benefit from better treatments.

The recent changes to US and EU M&A scrutiny powers were triggered by a 2020 announcement by US biotech firm Illumina about its plans to acquire Grail, a developer of early-detection cancer tests. At the time, this sounded like the kind of acquisition that would not suffer much scrutiny by antitrust authorities.

Grail’s product is not yet operational and acquiring it does not affect the dominant market position of Illumina. The deal did not even breach the EU merger regulation threshold of €5 billion (£4.3 billion) combined worldwide turnover for the companies involved.

Almost immediately, however, regulators in the US and the EU challenged the merger. Both announced plans to scrutinise its potential impact on competition and innovation in the market for genome-based diagnosis.

In this kind of situation, regulators are often concerned about market concentration. If another start-up comes up with better diagnostic tests, for example, a dominant player like Illumina might make its life difficult in order to protect its recent acquisition.

But killer acquisitions are the most extreme case of this kind of acquisition deal. Research shows that only about 6% of pharma acquisitions involve a large company buying a smaller one with a promising new drug simply to discontinue the innovative project.

In digital markets, dominant firms are also often suspected of pursuing a similar strategy. Last year, the UK regulator ordered Facebook to sell Giphy, a database of GIF-like animations it had acquired in 2020 for US$315 million (£262 million), for fear that it was a killer acquisition aimed at destroying a potential rival in the advertising market. When Meta started its appeal of this decision in April 2022, Giphy had yet to sell a single ad in the UK.

Similar to the pharma sector, however, few tech deals seem to correspond to the specific definition of a killer acquisition. And, in fact, dominant firms buying innovative start-ups before they generate any profit is a common business model in the digital economy.

In 2013, Waze was a potential disruptor to Google Maps as the dominant firm in the market for free online maps. But when Google acquired it for US$1.1 billion, it did not close Waze, as you would expect with a killer acquisition.

Instead, it added some of Waze’s innovative features into Google Maps and kept the former as a niche product. This allowed Google to stay dominant and to boost its profits from user data.

In this case, consumers benefited from a better Google Maps product, but Waze now has less incentive to innovate because it is not competing anymore. The FTC did not oppose the acquisition in 2013 but is now reportedly considering looking at it again.

Regulators’ big gamble

If regulators routinely block such acquisitions, start-ups will need to operate differently. Rather than relying on an acquisition by a dominant player to inject capital into the company, they will have to find other ways to earn money – possibly by charging consumers directly.

WhatsApp and Instagram, for example, had almost no revenue when Facebook bought them for US$19 billion and US$1 billion respectively. But they benefited from being acquired by a larger platform. Neither were killer acquisitions, but both increased market concentration.

By opening acquisitions of small and innovative firms to more scrutiny, regulators are taking a massive bet. To block an acquisition, they must demonstrate that it actually hurts innovation, often in very technical fields.

While researchers have been able to identify killer acquisitions after the fact, convincing a judge at the time of the purchase that a deal is bad for consumers is much more difficult. As such, the stakes are high for regulators: a wrong decision could affect the future of medicine and the future of our digital lives.The Conversation

About the Author:

Renaud Foucart, Senior Lecturer in Economics, Lancaster University Management School, Lancaster University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

 

Ichimoku Cloud Analysis 26.07.2022 (EURUSD, XAUUSD, NZDUSD)

Article By RoboForex.com

URUSD, “Euro vs US Dollar”

As we can see in the H4 chart, after forming a Shooting Star reversal pattern close to the resistance area, the asset is moving sideways. At the moment, EURUSD may reverse in the form of another descending impulse. In this case, the downside target may be at 1.0110. However, an alternative scenario implies that the price may correct to reach 1.0340 and continue the downtrend only after testing the resistance area.

EURUSD
Risk Warning: the result of previous trading operations do not guarantee the same results in the future

USDJPY, “US Dollar vs Japanese Yen”

As we can see in the H4 chart, USDJPY has formed a Hammer reversal pattern not far from the support area. At the moment, the asset may reverse and form a new ascending impulse. In this case, the upside target may be at 137.80. At the same time, an opposite scenario implies that the price may correct to reach 135.70 and continue the uptrend only after testing the support area.

USDJPY
Risk Warning: the result of previous trading operations do not guarantee the same results in the future

EURGBP, “Euro vs Great Britain Pound”

As we can see in the H4 chart, after forming an Engulfing reversal pattern near the resistance area, EURGBP is reversing in the form of a new descending impulse. In this case, the downside target may be the support level at 0.8420. Later, the market may test this level, break it, and continue moving downwards. Still, there might be an alternative scenario, in which the asset may correct to reach 0.8550 before testing 0.8420.

EURGBP

Article By RoboForex.com

Attention!
Forecasts presented in this section only reflect the author’s private opinion and should not be considered as guidance for trading. RoboForex LP bears no responsibility for trading results based on trading recommendations described in these analytical reviews.

Japanese Candlesticks Analysis 26.07.2022 (EURUSD, USDJPY, EURGBP)

Article By RoboForex.com

EURUSD, “Euro vs US Dollar”

As we can see in the H4 chart, after forming a Shooting Star reversal pattern close to the resistance area, the asset is moving sideways. At the moment, EURUSD may reverse in the form of another descending impulse. In this case, the downside target may be at 1.0110. However, an alternative scenario implies that the price may correct to reach 1.0340 and continue the downtrend only after testing the resistance area.

EURUSD
Risk Warning: the result of previous trading operations do not guarantee the same results in the future

USDJPY, “US Dollar vs Japanese Yen”

As we can see in the H4 chart, USDJPY has formed a Hammer reversal pattern not far from the support area. At the moment, the asset may reverse and form a new ascending impulse. In this case, the upside target may be at 137.80. At the same time, an opposite scenario implies that the price may correct to reach 135.70 and continue the uptrend only after testing the support area.

USDJPY
Risk Warning: the result of previous trading operations do not guarantee the same results in the future

EURGBP, “Euro vs Great Britain Pound”

As we can see in the H4 chart, after forming an Engulfing reversal pattern near the resistance area, EURGBP is reversing in the form of a new descending impulse. In this case, the downside target may be the support level at 0.8420. Later, the market may test this level, break it, and continue moving downwards. Still, there might be an alternative scenario, in which the asset may correct to reach 0.8550 before testing 0.8420.

EURGBP

Article By RoboForex.com

Attention!
Forecasts presented in this section only reflect the author’s private opinion and should not be considered as guidance for trading. RoboForex LP bears no responsibility for trading results based on trading recommendations described in these analytical reviews.

The Analytical Overview of the Main Currency Pairs on 2022.07.26

By JustForex

The EUR/USD currency pair

Technical indicators of the currency pair:
  • Prev Open: 1.0208
  • Prev Close: 1.0218
  • % chg. over the last day: -0.10%

The US central bank has no reason to get more hawkish, especially as the economy may be on the verge of recession. According to analysts, lower inflation expectations and an expected decline in the consumer price index are imminent in the coming months. It means that the Fed’s peak hawkishness has likely passed, removing a powerful bullish catalyst from the US dollar. On that basis, the most likely scenario of this week’s Fed meeting will be a 75 basis point rate hike. And this scenario is already priced in.

Trading recommendations
  • Support levels: 1.0181, 1.0106, 1.0035, 1.0000
  • Resistance levels: 1.0250, 1.0284, 1.0365, 1.0415, 1.050

From the technical point of view, the trend on the EUR/USD currency pair on the hourly time frame is bullish. The price is forming a wide balance, and the MACD indicator has become inactive, but the buyers’ pressure remains. Under such market conditions, it is best to look for buy trades on intraday time frames from the support level of 1.0181 or 1.0106, but only with confirmation. Sell trades can be considered from the resistance level of 1.0250 or 1.0284, but only after additional confirmation and only with short targets.

Alternative scenario: if the price breaks down through the 1.0000 support level and fixes below, the downtrend will likely resume.

EUR/USD
News feed for 2022.07.26:
  • – US CB Consumer Confidence (m/m) at 17:00 (GMT+3);
  • – US New Home Sales (m/m) at 17:00 (GMT+3).

The GBP/USD currency pair

Technical indicators of the currency pair:
  • Prev Open: 1.1993
  • Prev Close: 1.2046
  • % chg. over the last day: +0.44%

Despite gains in recent days, fundamentally, the British currency remains weak as the struggle for the Conservative Party leadership highlights the problems facing the country. The latest data from the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission shows that investors slightly reduced their net short positions in the sterling last week, halting a two-week rise but still keeping the market negative for the pound. As the race for the Prime Minister’s seat intensifies, analysts will be watching today’s televised debate between Foreign Secretary Liz Truss and former Finance Minister Rishi Sunak. Many expect UK policy to increase negative sentiment against the sterling in the coming months.

Trading recommendations
  • Support levels: 1.2000, 1.1907, 1.1803
  • Resistance levels: 1.2085, 1.2137

From the technical point of view, the trend on the GBP/USD currency pair on the hourly time frame is bullish. Buyers’ pressure has intensified. The MACD indicator is positive again, but there are signs of divergence. Under such market conditions, buy trades are best to look at intraday time frames from the support level of 1.2000, but only with confirmation. Sell trades can be considered from the resistance level of 1.2085, but only after additional confirmation and with short targets.

Alternative scenario: if the price breaks down through the 1.1907 support level and fixes below, the downtrend will likely resume.

GBP/USD
There is no news feed for today.

The USD/JPY currency pair

Technical indicators of the currency pair:
  • Prev Open: 136.09
  • Prev Close: 136.65
  • % chg. over the last day: +0.41%

According to the monetary policy minutes report, the Bank of Japan expects core consumer prices (excluding food and fuel) in Japan to rise by 2.3% this fiscal year on an annualized basis, mainly due to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the impact of yen depreciation. For the fiscal 2023 year, the forecasts are a 1.7% increase in consumer prices. Crude oil and other energy prices are expected to remain high. So, there are no fundamental reasons for the yen to strengthen at the moment, and the decrease in USD/JPY quotes occurs mainly due to the decline in the US Dollar Index.

Trading recommendations
  • Support levels: 135.99, 135.40, 134.64, 134.11
  • Resistance levels: 136.60, 137.26, 137.81, 138.25, 138.56, 140.29

From the technical point of view, the medium-term trend on the USD/JPY currency pair is bearish. The price is trading below the moving averages. The MACD indicator is not active. It should be noted that any fundamental factors do not accompany the fall in the USD/JPY quotes, so selling is still a very cautious option. Under such market conditions, buy trades can be searched for intraday from the support level of 135.99, but with additional confirmation. For sell deals, traders can consider the resistance level of 136.60 or 137.26, but only with additional confirmation and short targets.

Alternative scenario: If the price fixes above 138.25, the uptrend will likely resume.

USD/JPY
News feed for 2022.07.26:
  • – Japan Monetary Policy Meeting Minutes (m/m) at 02:50 (GMT+3).

The USD/CAD currency pair

Technical indicators of the currency pair:
  • Prev Open: 1.2917
  • Prev Close: 1.2846
  • % chg. over the last day: -0.55%

The Canadian dollar is a commodity currency, so rising oil prices are strengthening the Canadian currency. The Bank of Canada, as well as the Fed, is on the path of aggressive interest rate increases. The difference between rates is minimal. The Central Bank of Canada holds the rate at 2.5%, while the Fed has a rate of 1.75%. A 0.75% rate hike on Wednesday would put both central banks’ rates at 2.5%. Therefore, traders should not expect a medium-term trend on the USD/CAD currency pair right now.

Trading recommendations
  • Support levels: 1.2781
  • Resistance levels: 1.2841, 1.2912, 1.3006, 1.3085, 1.3154

In terms of technical analysis, the trend on the USD/CAD currency pair is bearish. At the moment, the price is forming a balance and trading at the levels of the moving lines. The MACD indicator has become negative again. Under such market conditions, it is best to consider sell deals from the resistance level of 1.2841 or 1.2912, but with confirmation. Buy trades should be considered on the lower time frames from the support level 1.2781, but only with confirmation and short targets.

Alternative scenario: if the price breaks out and consolidates above the 1.3006 resistance level, the uptrend will likely resume.

USD/CAD
There is no news feed for today.

By JustForex

 

This article reflects a personal opinion and should not be interpreted as an investment advice, and/or offer, and/or a persistent request for carrying out financial transactions, and/or a guarantee, and/or a forecast of future events.

Traders focus on big-company reports today

By JustForex

The Dow Jones index had a positive start to the week on Monday as a rally in energy offset weakness in the technology sector ahead of quarterly reports from major technology companies and a Federal Reserve meeting. As the stock market closed yesterday, the Dow Jones index (US30) increased by 0.28%, and the S&P 500 Index (US500) added 0.13%. The Technology Index NASDAQ (US100) was down by 0.35% yesterday.

The threat of a recession could push the Fed to roll back its hike cycle as the central bank tries to get a soft landing for the US economy, and raising interest rates brings the US economy closer to recession. According to analysts, lower inflation expectations and an expected decline in the Consumer Price Index are imminent in the coming months. That means the Fed’s hawkishness is at its peak, and a change in the Fed’s outlook could lead to a bearish US dollar reaction.

On Monday, US retailer Walmart (WMT) Inc lowered its earnings forecast and said shoppers are cutting back on discretionary purchases as inflation hits family budgets. Shares of WMT fell by 10% on the report.

Microsoft (MSFT), Alphabet (GOOGL), Visa (V), Louis Vuitton ADR (LVMUY), Coca-Cola (KO), McDonald’s (MCD), United Parcel Service (UPS), Texas Instruments (TXN), Raytheon Technologies (RTX), Unilever ADR (UL), 3M (MMM), General Electric (GE), General Motors (GM) and others report today.

Equity markets in Europe were mostly up yesterday. German DAX (DE30) was down by 0.33% on Monday, French CAC 40 (FR40) gained 0.33%, Spanish IBEX 35 (ES35) gained0.42%, British FTSE 100 (UK100) was up by 0.41%.

Business sentiment in Germany is cooling down. The Ifo Business Climate Index fell to 88.6 points in July from 92.2 points (seasonally adjusted) in June and reached its lowest value since June 2020. Companies expect doing business to become much more difficult in the coming months. Higher energy prices and the threat of gas shortages are putting pressure on the economy. Germany is on the verge of a recession.

Oil rose in volatile trading ahead of the Federal Reserve’s rate decision this week. Oil prices increased amid expectations that a reduction in natural gas supplies from Russia to Europe could encourage a switch to crude oil.

Asian markets traded lower yesterday. Japan’s Nikkei 225 (JP225) decreased by 0.77%, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng (HK50) fell by 0.22%, and Australia’s S&P/ASX 200 (AU200) ended the day gaining 0.02%.

Singapore’s Consumer Price Index rose from 5.6% to 6.7% year on year, surpassing economists’ median estimate of 6.2%. The last time such a figure was in 2008. The core Consumer Price Index, which excludes fuel and living expenses, increased to 4.4% in June from 3.6% in May. According to experts, a rebound in domestic demand in some regional economies as the Covid-19 restrictions are loosened could lead to a further rise in inflation.

In Australia, inflation data will be released on Wednesday. In addition to being an important indicator, Australia publishes consumer price data once a quarter. The RBA is expected to hold its monetary policy meeting next week. It is expected that inflation will rise to 4.7% YoY from 3.7%. Thus, the most likely scenario for the central bank’s further actions is another 0.5% rate hike.

S&P 500 (F) (US500) 3,966.84 +5.21 (+0.13%)

Dow Jones (US30) 31,990.04 +90.75 (+0.28%)

DAX (DE40) 13,210.32 −43.36 (−0.33%)

FTSE 100 (UK100) 7,306.30 +29.93 (+0.41%)

USD Index 106.43 −0.30 (−0.28%)

Important events for today:
  • – Japan Monetary Policy Meeting Minutes (m/m) at 02:50 (GMT+3);
  • – US CB Consumer Confidence (m/m) at 17:00 (GMT+3);
  • – US New Home Sales (m/m) at 17:00 (GMT+3).

By JustForex

 

This article reflects a personal opinion and should not be interpreted as an investment advice, and/or offer, and/or a persistent request for carrying out financial transactions, and/or a guarantee, and/or a forecast of future events.

Big Tech earnings and Fed meeting in focus

By ForexTime

Asian markets edged higher on Tuesday, drawing support from China’s technology sector as investors braced for another busy and potentially volatile week for financial markets.

Overnight, Wall Street delivered a mixed performance thanks to the growing caution ahead of earnings from the tech titans, as well as the Federal Reserve decision on Wednesday. In the FX space, the dollar weakened against most G10 currencies while gold traded within a tight range, waiting for a fresh fundamental catalyst. Oil prices are on the front foot this morning following reports that Russia plans to tighten its gas supplies on Europe.

On the data front, the IMF will be in focus today as it releases an updated world economic outlook. There are also a couple of key economic releases from major economies over the next few days, especially in the United States. It may be wise to keep an eye out on the latest US consumer confidence report for July, US Q2 GDP, and the PCE core deflator among other key economic releases.

The tech megacaps will be under the spotlight as they publish their earnings this week. Google’s parent company, Alphabet, and Microsoft announce their results today after US markets close. Meta, Amazon, and Apple report their earnings over the next few days. If these titans report much better than expected quarterly result, this could support US equity markets, especially the Nasdaq 100 which is down almost 25% year-to-date.

It’s all about the Fed meeting

The Federal Reserve is widely expected to raise interest rates by 75-basis points for a second straight meeting tomorrow. However, the main focus will be directed towards Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s post-meeting conference. When considering how financial markets remain highly sensitive to any topic relating to inflation and interest rates, Powell will have to choose his words very wisely. He is likely to highlight the Fed’s determination to extinguish inflation while inflicting more pain on the economy with continued policy tightening. While the U.S economy seems to be holding steady with the latest employment numbers encouraging, inflation remains a cause for concern as consumer prices jumped 9.1% in June from a year earlier. There have also been worrying signs from recent data with weakness in business survey data and the jobless claims.

If the Fed moves ahead with a 75-basis point hike, this may not be enough to keep dollar bulls in the driving seat. Such a move needs to be complemented by firmly hawkish comments from Powell, feeding speculation around more aggressive hikes this year. Should the Fed surprise the market with a smaller than expected hike, this could send the dollar tumbling with a cautious-sounding Powell adding insult to injury. Whatever the outcome of the Fed meeting, it is likely to influence the dollar which has weakened against most G10 currencies this week.

Commodity spotlight – Gold

Gold is likely to remain on standby until the Fed rate decision on Wednesday. The precious metal has barely moved since Monday due to the absence of a fresh directional catalyst. It will be interesting to see how gold reacts when the Fed moves ahead with a 75-basis rate hike. Will the precious metal weaken due to its zero-yielding status? Or will a weaker dollar limit downside losses?

Looking at the technical picture, prices are trading around the $1724 level as of writing. The $1700 remains a key point of interest this week and a level that can determine whether gold rebounds or extends the decline.


Forex-Time-LogoArticle by ForexTime

ForexTime Ltd (FXTM) is an award winning international online forex broker regulated by CySEC 185/12 www.forextime.com

Cross-pollination among neuroscience, psychology and AI research yields a foundational understanding of thinking

By Paul S. Rosenbloom, University of Southern California; Christian Lebiere, Carnegie Mellon University, and John E. Laird, University of Michigan 

Progress in artificial intelligence has enabled the creation of AIs that perform tasks previously thought only possible for humans, such as translating languages, driving cars, playing board games at world-champion level and extracting the structure of proteins. However, each of these AIs has been designed and exhaustively trained for a single task and has the ability to learn only what’s needed for that specific task.

Recent AIs that produce fluent text, including in conversation with humans, and generate impressive and unique art can give the false impression of a mind at work. But even these are specialized systems that carry out narrowly defined tasks and require massive amounts of training.

It still remains a daunting challenge to combine multiple AIs into one that can learn and perform many different tasks, much less pursue the full breadth of tasks performed by humans or leverage the range of experiences available to humans that reduce the amount of data otherwise required to learn how to perform these tasks. The best current AIs in this respect, such as AlphaZero and Gato, can handle a variety of tasks that fit a single mold, like game-playing. Artificial general intelligence (AGI) that is capable of a breadth of tasks remains elusive.

Ultimately, AGIs need to be able to interact effectively with each other and people in various physical environments and social contexts, integrate the wide varieties of skill and knowledge needed to do so, and learn flexibly and efficiently from these interactions.

Building AGIs comes down to building artificial minds, albeit greatly simplified compared to human minds. And to build an artificial mind, you need to start with a model of cognition.

a robot with a single arm grasps one of five colored blocks on a small table
This robot, powered by an AI called Rosie, learned how to solve this puzzle from a human who communicated to the robot using natural language.
James Kirk, CC BY-ND

From human to Artificial General Intelligence

Humans have an almost unbounded set of skills and knowledge, and quickly learn new information without needing to be re-engineered to do so. It is conceivable that an AGI can be built using an approach that is fundamentally different from human intelligence. However, as three longtime researchers in AI and cognitive science, our approach is to draw inspiration and insights from the structure of the human mind. We are working toward AGI by trying to better understand the human mind, and better understand the human mind by working toward AGI.

From research in neuroscience, cognitive science and psychology, we know that the human brain is neither a huge homogeneous set of neurons nor a massive set of task-specific programs that each solves a single problem. Instead, it is a set of regions with different properties that support the basic cognitive capabilities that together form the human mind.

These capabilities include perception and action; short-term memory for what is relevant in the current situation; long-term memories for skills, experience and knowledge; reasoning and decision making; emotion and motivation; and learning new skills and knowledge from the full range of what a person perceives and experiences.

Instead of focusing on specific capabilities in isolation, AI pioneer Allen Newell in 1990 suggested developing Unified Theories of Cognition that integrate all aspects of human thought. Researchers have been able to build software programs called cognitive architectures that embody such theories, making it possible to test and refine them.

Cognitive architectures are grounded in multiple scientific fields with distinct perspectives. Neuroscience focuses on the organization of the human brain, cognitive psychology on human behavior in controlled experiments, and artificial intelligence on useful capabilities.

The Common Model of Cognition

We have been involved in the development of three cognitive architectures: ACT-R, Soar and Sigma. Other researchers have also been busy on alternative approaches. One paper identified nearly 50 active cognitive architectures. This proliferation of architectures is partly a direct reflection of the multiple perspectives involved, and partly an exploration of a wide array of potential solutions. Yet, whatever the cause, it raises awkward questions both scientifically and with respect to finding a coherent path to AGI.

Fortunately, this proliferation has brought the field to a major inflection point. The three of us have identified a striking convergence among architectures, reflecting a combination of neural, behavioral and computational studies. In response, we initiated a communitywide effort to capture this convergence in a manner akin to the Standard Model of Particle Physics that emerged in the second half of the 20th century.

a graphic showing a human head and brain on the left, a robot head with circuits on the right, and a chart with five colored blocks and arrows connecting the blocks
This basic model of cognition both explains human thinking and provides a blueprint for true artificial intelligence.
Andrea Stocco, CC BY-ND

This Common Model of Cognition divides humanlike thought into multiple modules, with a short-term memory module at the center of the model. The other modules – perception, action, skills and knowledge – interact through it.

Learning, rather than occurring intentionally, happens automatically as a side effect of processing. In other words, you don’t decide what is stored in long-term memory. Instead, the architecture determines what is learned based on whatever you do think about. This can yield learning of new facts you are exposed to or new skills that you attempt. It can also yield refinements to existing facts and skills.

The modules themselves operate in parallel; for example, allowing you to remember something while listening and looking around your environment. Each module’s computations are massively parallel, meaning many small computational steps happening at the same time. For example, in retrieving a relevant fact from a vast trove of prior experiences, the long-term memory module can determine the relevance of all known facts simultaneously, in a single step.

Guiding the way to Artificial General Intelligence

The Common Model is based on the current consensus in research in cognitive architectures and has the potential to guide research on both natural and artificial general intelligence. When used to model communication patterns in the brain, the Common Model yields more accurate results than leading models from neuroscience. This extends its ability to model humans – the one system proven capable of general intelligence – beyond cognitive considerations to include the organization of the brain itself.

We are starting to see efforts to relate existing cognitive architectures to the Common Model and to use it as a baseline for new work – for example, an interactive AI designed to coach people toward better health behavior. One of us was involved in developing an AI based on Soar, dubbed Rosie, that learns new tasks via instructions in English from human teachers. It learns 60 different puzzles and games and can transfer what it learns from one game to another. It also learns to control a mobile robot for tasks such as fetching and delivering packages and patrolling buildings.

Rosie is just one example of how to build an AI that approaches AGI via a cognitive architecture that is well characterized by the Common Model. In this case, the AI automatically learns new skills and knowledge during general reasoning that combines natural language instruction from humans and a minimal amount of experience – in other words, an AI that functions more like a human mind than today’s AIs, which learn via brute computing force and massive amounts of data.

From a broader AGI perspective, we look to the Common Model both as a guide in developing such architectures and AIs, and as a means for integrating the insights derived from those attempts into a consensus that ultimately leads to AGI.The Conversation

About the Author:

Paul S. Rosenbloom, Professor Emeritus of Computer Science, University of Southern California; Christian Lebiere, Research Psychologist, Carnegie Mellon University, and John E. Laird, John L. Tishman Professor of Engineering, University of Michigan

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.