Archive for Financial News – Page 267

The ‘Bear Killer’ Does it Again

Source: Michael Ballanger  (11/1/22) 

 Expert Michael Ballanger reviews recent updates in the stock market to tell you where he believes it is headed and why he thinks October was “The Bear Killer,” with countless bear markets ending and bull markets possibly beginning today, November 1, 2022.

People familiar with my missives over the past couple of decades know me well enough to expect sudden and hard-to-explain shifts in positioning at the drop of a hat and with little or no advanced notice.

You also have grown to appreciate that technical analysis, an analytical tool increasingly use (and abused) by generations of relative novices to the world of securities analysis, today dominates everything.

How many times have I written about the dangers of “false breakouts” with the even more insidious “false breakdowns” as mortal traps to avoid?

On September 25 of last month, I penned Email Alert 2022-87, where I highlighted massive trend breakdowns in every major index in North America.

I was fully prepared to call a major sell signal until three days later when the Bank of England reversed their embarkation into QT and decided instead to return to QE to save their pension funds from certain implosion.

That was “the most important headline of 2022” because it confirmed the vulnerability of not just U.K. pension funds but literally every pension fund on the planet striving to meet their minimum 7.5% return needed to meet pensioner obligations. Why I deemed that as a significant event goes back to 1977 while in training with the venerable brokerage firm McLeod, Young & Weir Ltd.

Barring any surprises on Monday, the S&P 500 will clock in at its second-best or best performance month of the year, once again proving that, as I have been writing about all through September, October is known as “The Bear Killer” with countless bear markets ending and bull markets beginning by November 1, 2022.

I was working in the “quant” section, which was headed up by an English gentleman by the name of Peter Williams.

This was long before personal computers or cellular phones or the internet, so all pricing data had to be inputted manually, and while I was updating the prices for all major North American exchanges, I came across the chart of the “FTSE” (Financial Times Stock Index) which, I was soon to learn, was the British version of the Dow Jones Industrials.

I asked Peter why it was necessary to use a foreign stock market when all of our clients were North American. He proceeded to tell me that what happens to stock market trends in the U.K. always shows up in North America in due course.

Over the lunch hour, I drew an overlay of the FTSE onto the S&P chart and what materialized was a lead indicator for North American stocks in the form of the FTSE. Now, since the central banks hijacked the equity markets under Greenspan starting in the late 1980s, it is no longer as pronounced, but the significance lies in the event as opposed to the response.

Pension fund stress brought about by excessive leverage in the 10-year gilts market will unquestionably show up across the pond in North America, and it will include the insurance companies as well striving to meet their actuarial benchmarks.

Most importantly, do not think for a New York minute that Jerome Powell is unaware of this.

Needless to say, when the headline hit the tape about the Band of England’s sudden reversal from gilt seller to gilt buyer, I executed my own personal “pivot” and went from black bearish to pound-the-table bullish with my shift out of the volatility trade (UVXY:US) and into the double-leverage S&P 500 ETF known as UPRO:US (double leverage SPY:US).

The S&P 500 has since put on an 8.8% advance for the month of October, with only Halloween left on Monday.

To put this in perspective, the July rally was +9.11%, and that was before the FANGS (ex-Apple) decided to crater.

The Big Boys

All through October, I have had to answer a torrent of questions as to “Why are stocks rallying?” followed by a minimum of ten reasons they should actually be crashing.

The answer lies in three simple words — The Big Boys.

Who remembers the U.S. elections in November 2016 when the markets were in full “meltdown mode” due to a surprise victory by Republican Donald Trump?

The sheer panic of the post-results hours had stock investors in absolute terror as the S&P was down 8% by midnight. That was until Carl Icahn, and his billionaire buddies stepped up and took the futures straight north and just kept up the buying pressure until the early morning hours when stocks finally opened with wall-to-wall bids and CNBC in ecstasy.

All during the following post-election trading session, the financial news commentators, who were lambasting Trump the night before with stocks in freefall, suddenly changed their narrative such that the Trump victory went from bearish to bullish in less than twenty-four hours.

You really do not want any stock that is found in any of the heavily-leveraged S&P or NASDAQ ETFs because as leverage gets rinsed from the system, the names that dominate will be “on offer” for many more months.

Ever since J.P. Morgan stepped up and rescued Wall Street during the Panic of 1907, it has always been The Big Boys with their bottomless wallets and the ears of every desk trader on the planet that determine where stocks are going.

The secondary clue for me came in the form of a story leaked out of Blackrock that the Fed has already decided to pause, so despite what will still probably be a 75-beep rise in the FFR on Wednesday, the forward guidance will probably be construed as dovish.

Barring any surprises on Monday, the S&P 500 will clock in at its second-best or best performance month of the year, once again proving that, as I have been writing about all through September, October is known as “The Bear Killer” with countless bear markets ending and bull markets beginning by November 1, 2022.

Make no mistake; the beautiful move in the UPRO call options and impending profits are pale when compared to the paper losses in the metals arena. Gold is down 13.43% YTD, with silver down 18.1% and copper off 22.98%.

Every single bullish narrative from 2020/2021 has been summarily vanquished by the 2022 bear market. In tightening cycles, that is what happens. You are repeating the mantra that “copper demand will rocket with the electrification movement,” and it matters not whether or not you turn out to be right on the money in 2023 because this is 2022 and the “electrification trade” is yesterday’s news.

Ditto the precious metals sector, where the senior producers are sporting pristine balance sheets and robust income statements, but no one cares about that because prices are in the tank.

Twenty years ago, Wall Street had thousands of stock analysts, usually C.P.A.’s, and usually C.F.A., that pored through thousands of annual reports and income statements in an attempt to discover an unknown gem commonly described as “undervalued.”

Today, there a perhaps a few dozen left. People that bought shares in companies like these were considered “value investors” as opposed to “growth investors,” and it is no secret that growth has outperformed value ever since the Fed hijacked markets.

Up until Jerome Powell told us all that he was no longer using the term “transitory” to describe the sharp rise in the cost of living, there was really no reason to own value stocks because they are typically lower risk, lower growth issues and with the Fed juicing the market every time it hiccupped, there was simply no need to own value because you were leaving a great portion of alpha (performance of an investment against a market index or benchmark that is considered to represent the market’s movement as a whole) on the table.

Markets that fail to go down into bad news are markets that should be bought.

The good news is that without the “Fed put” rescuing stocks at the faintest hint of corrective action, Wall Street is going to be forced to return to what the pundits like to call a “stock picker’s market,” which means that extraordinary value plays like the gold miners are going to come back onto the radar screens of the big funds.

That means that you really do not want any stock that is found in any of the heavily-leveraged S&P or NASDAQ ETFs because as leverage gets rinsed from the system, the names that dominate will be “on offer” for many more months.

What will avoid leverage purging are the value stocks that live and breathe on their own merits and without the artificial perpetual bids that arrive at the beginning of every month from these passive funds. The supply of stock that will need to be sold in the passive funds will be in stark contrast to the companies that never made it to the dance (inclusion in the ETF baskets).

 

The Junior Resource Sector

 

So where, pray tell, does that leave the junior resource sector?

Firstly, the junior gold stocks (producers, developers, and explorers) could not be expected to enter any kind of a mania resembling crypto or cannabis, or tech, with a gold price down 21.1% since August 2020.

In the period since that peak, we have seen massive fiscal and monetary stimulus, geopolitical turmoil, and bond market blow-ups, the nature of which in past eras would have money gushing into the metals.

However, the only place on the planet where that failed to occur was North America, where the dominance of the U.S. dollar neutralized any need for safe haven positioning because owning dollars (or living in a country that creates them) is the safe haven.

People in Turkey, Argentina, and Latin America have all seen their currencies decline against the greenback, so they have been buying vast quantities of gold and silver and benefitting greatly, in addition to moving huge amounts of domestic savings into the dollar.

Canadian investors have seen their currency hold up incredibly well versus the USD, and for the life of me, I do not know why. Household debt-to-income levels are magnitudes higher than American levels pre-GFC in 2008.

The national debt-to-GDP numbers have Canada ahead of the U.S., Japan, the U.K., and China amidst the largest real estate bubble in the history of modern record-keeping.

One would think that of all the countries in the world in need of safe havens, Canada would be at the forefront.

The problem is that, unlike the U.S., Canada does not hold a reserve currency status, so no one is stockpiling Canadian dollars as an insurance policy against sovereign default.

The Canadian banks operate like miniature versions of the big U.S. banks, so currency traders focus on what the banks are doing rather than on what the government is doing, and therein lies the opportunity.

If anyone making investment decisions were watching the fiscal train wreck lying on the horizon, the CAD would be in the low CA$0.60’s versus the USD.

Canadian and American speculators once used the TSX Venture Exchange as their preferred non-casino location for gambling — owning those Canadian resource companies famous the world over for a) delivering phenomenal mineral discoveries resulting in enormous capital gains and b) fulfilling Mark Twain’s definition of a gold mine: “A hole in the ground with a liar at the top.

Canadian exploration companies have indeed delivered some amazing returns but what must be recognized is the role of the promoter — the jockey — in advancing the project.

By default, the expectation levels are inflated because the only way to raise risk capital is to “sell the dream,” and while statistically, the odds of making a major discovery are long, that dream of owning an early-stage position in Hemlo or Eskay Creek or Voisey’s Bay remains firmly in place.

What the TSX Venture exchange needs desperately is for a series of new developments:

  • S. dollar top
  • New discovery with the attendant share price explosion
  • Major market stability
  • Commodity price reversal

All of the above conditions will occur at the point where financial system instability leaps ahead of price stability in the minds and actions of the U.S. Fed, along with the rest of the global central bank cabal. It is really that simple.

Since the first share of stock ever traded with owners back in Amsterdam in the 1600s, there have been speculators.

In fact, in the 70s, the old-time brokers would lecture me on the importance of being an investor where all one owned was high-quality bonds.

Stocks were for speculators, and bonds were for investors, but the fact remains that in the Canadian resource sector, new discoveries are 100%-funded by speculators.

In a world that has been devoid of any new discoveries and a huge drop-off in CAPEX related to exploration for and development of new deposits, there is going to be an enormous need for new discoveries, which means out of absolute necessity, exploration activity will increase dramatically.

Junior developers with growing resources — Getchell Gold Corp. (GTCH:CSE; GGLDF:OTCQB), Western Uranium & Vanadium Corp. (WUC:CSE; WSTRF:OTCQX). (WUC:CSE; WSTRF:OTCQX), Northisle Copper and Gold Inc. (NCX:TSX; NTCPF:OTCPK)  — will be the first to catch a bid, followed by explorers that have large, district-scale land positions — MAX Resource Corp. (MAX:TSX.V; MXROF:OTCBB), Norseman Silver Ltd. (NOC:TSX.V; NOCSF:OTCQB), Goldcliff Resource Corp. (GCN:TSX.V; GCFFF:OTCBB).

The ones I own are all funded, eliminating the need for any panicking.

Have We Entered a New Bull Market?

Do I think we have entered a new bull market?

Was the low on October 13, 20222, “the low”?

I have no clue, but I will say this: Markets that fail to go down into bad news (earnings disappointments from AMZN, META, MSFT, and NFLX) are markets that should be bought.

The larger question is: “Can I buy stocks here for a seasonal trade into Q1/2023 that works?” I think so.

Maybe we wait until markets pull back after the big institutional money flows are finished allocating Tuesday-Thursday next week. With the corporate buyback blackout period ending at month-end, some US$5 billion in new buyback bids are going to get posted, giving more ammo to a market still dominated by put buyers and short sellers.

In fact, the Twitter feeds I get are rife with gnashing and gnarling of teeth over rising stock prices and an absolute bombardment of outrage that people would be so stupid as to actually think that the Fed will pivot. In other words, they missed the rally.

And there is nothing sourer than a FOMO/YOLO trader left out of the second-best move of the year. That tells me that sentiment is perfectly positioned for a Q3 rally into January, assuming, of course, that the Fed does nothing silly like ramp up the hawkish rhetoric.

The history books tell me that we are just about to exit the month known as “The Bear Killer,” and here in 2022, it lived up to expectations. Scrub from your minds the notion of all-time highs of US$200 silver or US$10 copper.

Instead, I will be focusing on companies that I see as undervalued in commodity sectors experiencing near-shortage conditions. As the markets heal, the bullish narratives for copper and uranium will return, with gold and silver still the two most mispriced metals on the planet.

Michael Ballanger Disclaimer:

This letter makes no guarantee or warranty on the accuracy or completeness of the data provided. Nothing contained herein is intended or shall be deemed to be investment advice, implied or otherwise. This letter represents my views and replicates trades that I am making but nothing more than that. Always consult your registered advisor to assist you with your investments. I accept no liability for any loss arising from the use of the data contained on this letter. Options and junior mining stocks contain a high level of risk that may result in the loss of part or all invested capital and therefore are suitable for experienced and professional investors and traders only. One should be familiar with the risks involved in junior mining and options trading and we recommend consulting a financial adviser if you feel you do not understand the risks involved.

Disclosures:

1) Michael J. Ballanger: I, or members of my immediate household or family, own securities of the following companies mentioned in this article: All. I personally am, or members of my immediate household or family are, paid by the following companies mentioned in this article: My company, Bonaventure Explorations Ltd., has a consulting relationship with Norseman Silver.

2) The following companies mentioned in this article are billboard sponsors of Streetwise Reports: None. Click here for important disclosures about sponsor fees. As of the date of this article, an affiliate of Streetwise Reports has a consulting relationship with Western Uranium & Vanadium Corp. Please click here for more information.

3) Statements and opinions expressed are the opinions of the author and not of Streetwise Reports or its officers. The author is wholly responsible for the validity of the statements. The author was not paid by Streetwise Reports for this article. Streetwise Reports was not paid by the author to publish or syndicate this article. Streetwise Reports requires contributing authors to disclose any shareholdings in, or economic relationships with, companies that they write about. Streetwise Reports relies upon the authors to accurately provide this information and Streetwise Reports has no means of verifying its accuracy.

4) This article does not constitute investment advice. Each reader is encouraged to consult with his or her individual financial professional and any action a reader takes as a result of information presented here is his or her own responsibility. By opening this page, each reader accepts and agrees to Streetwise Reports’ terms of use and full legal disclaimer. This article is not a solicitation for investment. Streetwise Reports does not render general or specific investment advice and the information on Streetwise Reports should not be considered a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Streetwise Reports does not endorse or recommend the business, products, services or securities of any company mentioned on Streetwise Reports.

5) From time to time, Streetwise Reports LLC and its directors, officers, employees or members of their families, as well as persons interviewed for articles and interviews on the site, may have a long or short position in securities mentioned. Directors, officers, employees or members of their immediate families are prohibited from making purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market or otherwise from the time of the decision to publish an article until three business days after the publication of the article. The foregoing prohibition does not apply to articles that in substance only restate previously published company releases.

As of the date of this article, officers and/or employees of Streetwise Reports LLC (including members of their household) own securities of Getchell Gold Corp., Norseman Silver Ltd., and Western Uranium & Vanadium Corp., companies mentioned in this article.

Japanese Candlesticks Analysis 02.11.2022 (EURUSD, USDJPY, EURGBP)

Article By RoboForex.com

EURUSD, “Euro vs US Dollar”

On H4, at the pullback near the support level, the pair has formed a Doji reversal pattern. Currently, the pair may go by the signal in the form of an ascending wave. The goal of growth will be 1.0010. However, the price may pull back to 0.9845, bounce off this level, and continue the uptrend after correction.

EURUSD
Risk Warning: the result of previous trading operations do not guarantee the same results in the future

USDJPY, “US Dollar vs Japanese Yen”

On H4 at a pullback the pair has formed a reversal pattern Hammer. Currently, the pair may go by the signal in the form of an ascending wave. The goal of growth will be 149.00. However, the pair may pull back to 146.55 and continue the uptrend after a correction to the support level.

USDJPY
Risk Warning: the result of previous trading operations do not guarantee the same results in the future

EURGBP, “Euro vs Great Britain Pound”

On H4, the pair has formed a Doji reversal pattern. Currently, the pair may go by the signal in the form of an ascending wave. The goal of growth may be the resistance level of 0.8660. Upon testing and bouncing off it, the pair has the chance for continuing the downtrend. However, the quotes may decline to 0.8500 without pulling back to the resistance level.

EURGBP

Article By RoboForex.com

Attention!
Forecasts presented in this section only reflect the author’s private opinion and should not be considered as guidance for trading. RoboForex LP bears no responsibility for trading results based on trading recommendations described in these analytical reviews.

The cryptocurrency market digest (BTC, TON). Overview for 02.11.2022

Article By RoboForex.com

The BTC paused again. On Wednesday, it mainly fluctuates near 20,507 USD.

Investors are saving powers before the Federal Reserve System decides anything about the interest rate. The main forecast implies an increase by 75 base points to 4% annual. According to the CME, the probability of such a scenario is 86%.

However, the main attention will be focused on the press conference of the Fed’s head Jerome Powell where he will make forecasts and comments about future steps of the regulator.

We will see how capital markets will behave. Fundamentally, nothing changes for them positively: the price of crediting keeps growing, increasing the load on business. Hence, there are few reasons for optimism. However, this pessimism is predictable and habitual.

To be able to attack 21,500 USD efficiently, the BTC needs to step over 21,150-21,350 USD today. This will open a pathway to 22,500 USD.

Capitalisation of the crypto market today is 1,010 trillion USD; the BTC takes up 38.8% of the market, the ETH – 19%.

Americans want transparent regulations

According to The Harris Poll, at least 79% of questioned Americans think that the crypto industry needs more transparent regulations. This implies clear rules for investors in digital assets. The same poll showed that people still consider traditional money more reliable.

TON sky-rocketed

The TON crypto sprouted, growing by 11% overnight without any obvious reasons. Trade volumes amounted to 20.62 million USD.

Article By RoboForex.com

Attention!
Forecasts presented in this section only reflect the author’s private opinion and should not be considered as guidance for trading. RoboForex LP bears no responsibility for trading results based on trading recommendations described in these analytical reviews.

The Analytical Overview of the Main Currency Pairs on 2022.11.02

By JustMarkets

The EUR/USD currency pair

Technical indicators of the currency pair:
  • Prev Open: 0.9882
  • Prev Close: 0.9873
  • % chg. over the last day: -0.09 %

The US Fed is likely to raise the rate by 0.75% today. This scenario is already in the price movement, so the speech of the US Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell will be of most interest. If Mr. Powell hints that the Central Bank needs to take a slower rate hike, it could lead to a sharp drop in the dollar Index and a rise in the European currency. Conversely, hawkish statements that the US Fed will stay on its current course could further strengthen the dollar Index.

Trading recommendations
  • Support levels: 0.9873, 0.9835, 0.9755, 0.9601.
  • Resistance levels: 0.9928, 1.0055, 1.0111, 1.0162, 1.0230

From the technical point of view, the trend on the EUR/USD currency pair on the hourly time frame is bullish. The price is trading at the level of the moving averages. The MACD indicator is in the negative zone, but sellers’ pressure is weak due to the presence of divergence. Under such market conditions, buy trades should be considered from the support level of 0.9873, but with additional confirmation, since the level has already been tested. Sell deals can be considered from the resistance level of 0.9928, but also with confirmation.

Alternative scenario: if the price breaks down through the support level of 0.9834 and fixes below it, the downtrend will likely resume.

EUR/USD
News feed for 2022.11.02:
  • – Spanish Manufacturing PMI (m/m) at 10:15 (GMT+2);
  • – Italian Manufacturing PMI (m/m) at 10:45 (GMT+2);
  • – French Manufacturing PMI (m/m) at 10:50 (GMT+2);
  • – German Manufacturing PMI (m/m) at 10:55 (GMT+2);
  • – German Unemployment Rate (m/m) at 10:55 (GMT+2);
  • – Eurozone Manufacturing PMI (m/m) at 11:00 (GMT+2);
  • – US ADP Nonfarm Employment Change (m/m) at 14:15 (GMT+2);
  • – US FOMC Statement at 20:00 (GMT+2);
  • – US Fed Interest Rate Decision at 20:00 (GMT+2);
  • – US FOMC Press Conference at 20:30 (GMT+2).

The GBP/USD currency pair

Technical indicators of the currency pair:
  • Prev Open: 1.1465
  • Prev Close: 1.1482
  • % chg. over the last day: +0.15 %

The UK manufacturing sector started the last quarter of the year weakly. Production declined for the fourth consecutive month due to a sharp drop in new orders, weak export demand, and supply chain disruptions. The seasonally adjusted purchasing managers’ Index (PMI) fell to a 29-month low of 46.2 in October, down from 48.4 in September. Weakening global economic conditions, lower demand in China, the war in Ukraine, and ongoing Brexit-related problems that are holding back export performance were cited as reasons.

Trading recommendations
  • Support levels: 1.1466, 1.1337, 1.1172, 1.1093, 1.0915, 1.0817
  • Resistance levels: 1.1578, 1.1698, 1.1816, 1.1901

From the technical point of view, the GBP/USD currency pair trend on the hourly time frame is bullish. The price is trading at the level of the moving averages. The MACD indicator is negative, there is a divergence, and buyers’ pressure is still present. Under such market conditions, buy trades can be considered from the support level of 1.1466 or 1.1337, but better after confirmation. Sell trades are best to look for on intraday time frames, the nearest resistance level is 1.1578, but also better with confirmation in the form of a reverse initiative.

Alternative scenario: if the price breaks down of the 1.1172 support level and fixes below it, the downtrend will likely resume.

GBP/USD
News feed for 2022.11.02:
  • – US FOMC Statement at 20:00 (GMT+2);
  • – US Fed Interest Rate Decision at 20:00 (GMT+2).

The USD/JPY currency pair

Technical indicators of the currency pair:
  • Prev Open: 148.74
  • Prev Close: 148.23
  • % chg. over the last day: +0.34 %

Japanese Finance Minister Shun’ichi Suzuki said Tuesday that the country’s currency interventions were a covert operation to maximize the impact. But analysts think Mr. Suzuki is being disingenuous, as there had been talking of intervention long before the intervention itself. In any case, the aim was achieved – the Japanese yen has strengthened against the dollar and now is resisting falling. Experts think that a lot will depend on the US Federal Reserve policy, and if there are hints for a slower rate of increase today, the dollar Index might lose its strength, which would lead to a wide sideways movement or a slow strengthening of the yen. But let’s not forget that the interest rate differential still points to the USD/JPY rising.

Trading recommendations
  • Support levels: 146.64, 145.50, 144.91, 144.19, 143.00
  • Resistance levels: 148.09, 148.82, 147.75, 148.64, 148.64, 150.00, 151.05

From the technical point of view, the medium-term trend on the currency pair USD/JPY is bearish. The price is traded on the moving averages. The MACD indicator has become negative again, but the buyers’ pressure remains. Under such market conditions, buy trades can be sought on the intraday time frames from the support level of 146.64, but only after the confirmation. Sell deals can be searched from the resistance level of 148.09 or 148.82, but only with additional confirmation, as the level has already been tested.

Alternative scenario: If the price fixes above 150.00, the uptrend will likely resume.

USD/JPY
News feed for 2022.11.02:
  • – Japan Monetary Policy Meeting Minutes at 01:50 (GMT+2);
  • – US FOMC Statement at 20:00 (GMT+2);
  • – US Fed Interest Rate Decision at 20:00 (GMT+2).

The USD/CAD currency pair

Technical indicators of the currency pair:
  • Prev Open: 1.3619
  • Prev Close: 1.3629
  • % chg. over the last day: +0.07 %

Bank of Canada (BoC) Governor Tiff Macklem indicated that the Central Bank expects further rate hikes, but the further pace of increase has not yet been determined. According to Macklem, how much further rates rise will depend on how monetary policy works, how supply-side problems are handled and how inflation responds to this tightening cycle. But it was also said that the tightening phase is coming to an end.

Trading recommendations
  • Support levels: 1.3569, 1.3515, 1.3454
  • Resistance levels: 1.3721, 1.3855, 1.3968

From the point of view of technical analysis, the trend on the USD/CAD currency pair is bearish. The price is trading at the level of moving averages, wide-volatility balance is formed. The MACD indicator has become inactive, there is a slight buying pressure. The best way to sell is to consider the resistance level of 1.3721, but only after the additional confirmation. Buy trades should be considered on the lower time frames from the support level of 1.3569 or 1.3542, but also better after confirmation.

Alternative scenario: if the price breaks out and consolidates above the resistance level of 1.3721, the uptrend will likely resume.

USD/CAD
News feed for 2022.11.02:
  • – Canada BOC Macklem Speaks at 00:30 (GMT+2);
  • – US Crude Oil Reserves (w/w) at 16:30 (GMT+2);
  • – US FOMC Statement at 20:00 (GMT+2);
  • – US Fed Interest Rate Decision at 20:00 (GMT+2).

By JustMarkets

 

This article reflects a personal opinion and should not be interpreted as an investment advice, and/or offer, and/or a persistent request for carrying out financial transactions, and/or a guarantee, and/or a forecast of future events.

China plans to open to tourists in spring 2023. Bank of Japan may adjust its ultra-soft policy

By JustMarkets

As the stock market closed on Tuesday, the Dow Jones Index (US30) decreased by 0.24%, and the S&P500 Index (US500) lost 0.41%. The NASDAQ Technology Indexм(US100) decreased by 0.89% yesterday.

The JOLTS report indicated yesterday that the number of job openings rose to 10.7 million, missing analysts’ expectations. Fed officials began hinting that if Friday’s US labor market data indicated strength in the market, the US Fed might not cut the rate of increase until later in the year.

The US Fed is likely to raise rates by 0.75% today. This scenario is already in the price movement, so the biggest interest will be the speech of the head of the US Fed, Jerome Powell. If Mr. Powell hints that the Сentral Bank needs to take a slower rate hike, it could lead to a sharp drop in the dollar Index and a rise in the stock indices. Conversely, hawkish statements that the US Fed will stay on its current course could further strengthen the dollar Index. JP Morgan analysts say the 50bp rate hike combined with a dovish press conference could push the S&P 500 (US500) up 10-12% in 1 day.

Pfizer (PFE) reported third-quarter results that beat Wall Street estimates, despite declining Covid-19 vaccine sales in the quarter. The company’s stock was up more than 3%.

AMD (AMD) released a report Tuesday with third-quarter results that disappointed analysts. The income indicator did not justify the forecasts. But despite such a report, the company’s stock rose in the evening session.

Notable companies reporting today are Qualcomm (QCOM), Booking (BKNG), MetLife (MET), and Ferrari NV (RACE).

European stock markets were mostly up yesterday. German DAX (DE30) gained 0.64%, French CAC 40 (FR40) added 0.98%, Spanish IBEX 35 (ES35) jumped by 0.53%, British FTSE 100 (UK100) closed on Tuesday with 1.29%.

Risks to the global economic growth outlook continue to worsen in October, and leading indicators are signaling an even sharper decline, especially in the Eurozone. On the positive side, the Eurozone managed to avoid a recession in the third quarter, as private consumption proved more resilient to the impact of rising inflation. But inflationary pressures continue to intensify.

Despite a few concrete signs of easing inflation, Central Banks have already given the first signals that “peak growth” has been reached. The Bank of Norway, the Bank of Canada, and the Reserve Bank of Australia have already signaled a lower rate of tightening going forward, and analysts expect the ECB to also lower the rate of increase to 50 basis points in December.

China, the biggest oil importer, said Tuesday it is reviewing social restrictions because of the virus and may fully open for business and tourists by the spring of 2023. The news boosted oil futures after a two-day decline, and major Asian indices also rose.

According to the Wall Street Journal, Saudi Arabia shared intelligence with the US and warned of an imminent attack from Iran. The US, Saudi Arabia, and several other countries in the region raised the alert level of their units.

Asian markets traded higher yesterday. Japan’s Nikkei 225 (JP225) gained 0.33%, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng (HK50) ended the day up 5.23%, and Australia’s S&P/ASX 200 (AU200) increased by 1.65%.

The Reserve Bank of New Zealand, in its Financial Stability Report, indicated that while the financial system is generally strong, some households and businesses will be stressed in the coming months.

Bank of Japan Governor Haruhiko Kuroda said that the bank might adjust its ultra-soft policy if inflation in Japan continues to rise. Inflation in Japan is now close to an eight-year high and is projected to rise in the coming months.

S&P 500 (F) (US500) 3,856.10 −15.88 (−0.41%)

Dow Jones (US30) 32,653.20 −79.75 (−0.24%)

DAX (DE40) 13,338.74 +85.00 (+0.64%)

FTSE 100 (UK100) 7,186.16 +91.63 (+1.29%)

USD Index 111.51 -0.01 (-0.01%)

Important events for today:
  • – New Zealand RBNZ Gov Orr Speaks at 00:00 (GMT+2);
  • – Canada BOC Macklem Speaks at 00:30 (GMT+2);
  • – Japan Monetary Policy Meeting Minutes at 01:50 (GMT+2);
  • – Spanish Manufacturing PMI (m/m) at 10:15 (GMT+2);
  • – Italian Manufacturing PMI (m/m) at 10:45 (GMT+2);
  • – French Manufacturing PMI (m/m) at 10:50 (GMT+2);
  • – German Manufacturing PMI (m/m) at 10:55 (GMT+2);
  • – German Unemployment Rate (m/m) at 10:55 (GMT+2);
  • – Eurozone Manufacturing PMI (m/m) at 11:00 (GMT+2);
  • – US ADP Nonfarm Employment Change (m/m) at 14:15 (GMT+2);
  • – US Crude Oil Reserves (w/w) at 16:30 (GMT+2);
  • – US FOMC Statement at 20:00 (GMT+2);
  • – US Fed Interest Rate Decision at 20:00 (GMT+2);
  • – US FOMC Press Conference at 20:30 (GMT+2).

By JustMarkets

 

This article reflects a personal opinion and should not be interpreted as an investment advice, and/or offer, and/or a persistent request for carrying out financial transactions, and/or a guarantee, and/or a forecast of future events.

Beyond passenger cars and pickups: 5 questions answered about electrifying trucks

By Daniel Sperling, University of California, Davis; Lewis Fulton, University of California, Davis; Marshall Miller, University of California, Davis, and Miguel Jaller, University of California, Davis 

As part of its effort to reduce air pollution and cut greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to climate change, California is pursuing aggressive policies to promote clean trucks. The state already requires that by 2035, all new cars and other light-duty vehicles sold in the state must be zero emission. Its powerful Air Resources Board has adopted rules requiring that most trucks be zero emission by 2035, and is now proposing that all trucks sold by 2040 must be zero emission. The Conversation asked a panel of transportation experts from the University of California, Davis what’s involved in such a rapid transition.

1. Why is California targeting medium- and heavy-duty trucks?

Although diesel engines are valuable for moving heavy loads, they also are major polluters. Diesel trucks account for one-fourth of greenhouse gas emissions and about half of conventional air pollution from transportation in U.S. cities.

Pollutants in diesel exhaust include nitrogen oxides, fine particulates and numerous cancer-causing compounds. Since many disadvantaged communities are located near highways and industrial centers, their residents are especially affected by diesel truck pollution. Two regions in California – the Central Valley and Los Angeles-Long Beach – have some of the dirtiest air in the U.S., so the state has placed particular emphasis on cutting diesel use.

Almost all diesel fuel in the U.S. is used in trucks, not in passenger vehicles.

2. Are zero-emission trucks ready to go?

To a degree, yes. Some new models, mainly powered by batteries but some by hydrogen fuel cells, are available on the market, and more are being announced almost daily.

But the production volumes are still small, and there are many variations of truck models needed for very diverse applications, from delivering mail locally and plowing snow to hauling goods cross-country. Many of these needs cannot be met with currently offered zero-emission trucks.

Another hurdle is that new electric truck models have higher purchase prices than comparable diesel trucks. However, as the market for zero-emission trucks grows, economies of scale should bring these costs down significantly. We already see this happening with zero-emission cars and light-duty trucks.

The total cost of ownership for zero-emission trucks, which includes the purchase price, fuel costs and maintenance, is already competitive in some applications with conventional diesel trucks. One example is trucks used for local goods delivery by companies like Amazon, UPS and FedEx. This stage is also known as last-mile delivery – getting a product to a buyer’s door.

These trucks are typically driven less than 150 miles per day, so they don’t need large battery packs. Their lower energy costs and reduced maintenance needs often offset their higher purchase costs, so owners save money on them over time.

Our studies indicate that by 2025 and especially by 2030, many applications for battery trucks, and perhaps hydrogen fuel cell trucks, will have competitive or even lower total costs of ownership than comparable diesel trucks. That’s especially true because of California subsidies and incentives, such as the Hybrid and Zero-Emission Truck and Bus Voucher Incentive Project, which reduces the cost of new electric trucks and buses. And the state’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard greatly reduces the cost of low-carbon fuels and electricity for truck and bus fleets.

The market in California is already reacting to these policy signals and is developing quickly. In the past year, there has been a large increase in sales of last-mile electric delivery trucks, and companies have stepped up their pledges to procure such vehicles.

Over 150 zero-emission truck models are commercially available and eligible for state incentive funding. They range from large pickup trucks to heavy-duty tractor units for tractor-trailer combinations.

3. Is there enough charging infrastructure to support all these vehicles?

Providing near-zero-carbon electricity for EVs and hydrogen for fuel cells, and expanding charging and hydrogen refueling infrastructure, is just as important as getting zero-emission trucks on the roads.

Fleet owners will need to install chargers that can charge their battery-powered trucks overnight, or sometimes during the day. These stations may require so much power that utilities will need to install additional hardware to bring electricity from the grid to the stations to meet potentially high demands at certain times.

This video from the utility Southern California Edison shows some of the steps involved in electrifying medium- and heavy-duty vehicle fleets.

Fuel cell trucks will require hydrogen stations installed either at fleet depots or public locations. These will allow fast refueling without high instantaneous demands on the system. But producing the hydrogen will require electricity, which will put an additional burden on the electric system.

Presently there are few public or private charging or hydrogen stations for truck fleets in California. But the California Public Utility Commission has allowed utilities to charge their customers to install a significant number of stations throughout the state. And the U.S. Department of Energy recently allocated $8 billion for construction of hydrogen hubs – networks for producing, processing, storing and delivering clean hydrogen – across the country.

Despite these efforts, the rollout of charging and hydrogen infrastructure will likely slow the transition to zero-emission trucks, especially long-haul trucks.

4. Who would be affected by a diesel truck ban?

California’s rules will affect both truck manufacturers and truck users. The state’s Advanced Clean Trucks rule, adopted in 2020, requires the sale of increasing percentages of zero emission trucks starting in 2024. By 2035, 40% to 75% of all trucks, depending on the truck type, must be zero emission.

A new proposal scheduled for adoption in early 2023, the Advanced Clean Fleets rule, would require fleets with over 50 trucks to purchase an increasing number of zero-emission trucks over time, with the requirement that all truck sales and purchases be zero emission by 2040.

These two policies would work together. The Advanced Clean Trucks rule ensures that zero-emission trucks will become available to fleets, and the Advanced Clean Fleets rule would give truck manufacturers confidence that the zero-emission trucks they produce will find buyers.

These two rules are the most ambitious in the world in accelerating a transition to zero-emission trucks.

5. Are other states emulating California?

Yes, there is strong interest in many other states in electrifying trucking. Oregon, Washington, New York, New Jersey and Massachusetts have already adopted the Advanced Clean Trucks rule, and others are in the process of doing so. Seventeen states and the District of Columbia have agreed to work together to foster a self-sustaining market for medium- and heavy-duty vehicles.

We expect that transitioning to zero-emission truck fleets will require strong policy support at least until the 2030s and perhaps longer. The transition should become self-sufficient in most cases as production scales up and fleets adapt their operations, resulting in lower costs. This could be soon, especially with medium-duty trucks.

Converting large long-haul trucks will be especially challenging because they need large amounts of onboard energy storage and benefit from rapid refueling. Fuel cell systems with hydrogen may make the most sense for many of these vehicles; fleets will ultimately decide which technologies are best for them.

The transition to zero-emission trucks will be disruptive for many fleets and businesses, and will require government support during the early years of the transition. Overall, though, we believe prospects are bright for zero-emission trucking, with enormous clean air and climate benefits, and eventually, cost savings for truck owners.The Conversation

About the Author:

Daniel Sperling, Distinguished Blue Planet Prize Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Founding Director, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis; Lewis Fulton, Co-director, STEPS (Sustainable Transportation Energy Pathways), University of California, Davis; Marshall Miller, Senior Development Engineer, institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, and Miguel Jaller, Associate Professor of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of California, Davis

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Bankers need to be personally liable to avoid future financial crises – new research

By David Blake, City, University of London 

Most financial crises have plenty in common. They tend to start in the banking sector and involve excessive borrowing, together with an asset bubble, usually related to property.

The global crisis of 2008 was no different, with the asset bubble focused on US real estate. But my research suggests this crisis had another underlying cause – that some people in the banking sector were playing or “gaming” the system for their own financial gain.

The game being played had several important features. First was the deliberate complexity of the financial products at its core – in particular the products based on pooling residential mortgage loans (called “mortgage-backed securities”) that were sold by banks to other banks and institutional investors.

These products were issued by the very banks that had offered the mortgages to customers who did not earn enough to pay the mortgage interest, and relied on ever-increasing house prices to stay afloat.

Then there are the behavioural biases that pervade decision-making at all levels of the banking industry. My research found that banking can often attract a certain kind of person: those who are prone to overconfidence, excessive risk-taking and, in some cases, psychopathic behaviour.

Such people tend to like complexity for its own sake. But they often do not fully understand the implications of that complexity for the stability of the financial system as a whole. Often they do not care – they are primarily interested in gaming the system to maximise their bonuses.

The next element is risk. There are parts of the banking sector that will always be prone to risk, but my research suggests that many bankers have come to feel immune to its potential impact. Instead, they are comforted and emboldened by the view that, however recklessly banks behave, governments – and hence taxpayers – will always be there to bail them out.

Meanwhile, financial regulators attempt to set out effective rules and codes to mitigate risk. But this usually results only in a continual game of cat and mouse with an industry constantly seeking to circumvent any regulations they consider too onerous.

Game over?

Given all of this, there are no effective measures that any government would be prepared to introduce to deal with this situation. There have been no serious attempts to recognise or address the issue of product complexity, and when it comes to dealing with behaviour and personality types, everyone – including employees, managers, directors and even regulators – is susceptible.

Previous attempts to combat systemic risk in finance were based on the underlying assumption that the financial system is rational and that bankers want to behave rationally if they are given the right incentives. But these assumptions, my research indicates, are questionable.

Gaming in the banking sector seems virtually impossible to eliminate. The only effective measure to end it would be to make bankers personally liable for losses, to remove the sense that their actions – their games – have no personal financial or legal consequences.

It is this, rather than removing the cap on bankers’ bonuses, that has the best chance of preventing the financial system blowing up again.

However, no government has ever passed such a law. And no single government could do so on its own, since this would immediately cause their entire national banking sector to move wholesale to another jurisdiction.

The law would have to be introduced simultaneously in all countries – and the probability of this happening is negligible. In short, the only effective measure to limit gaming will not, and cannot, be introduced.

This may seem like a bleak conclusion, and in many ways it is – particularly for taxpayers. But there is a more positive alternative, which entails the industry returning to the simple products that the banks, their regulators and their customers understand. In most cases the complexity is unnecessary.

For we should not forget that the main functions of banks are pretty straightforward: to raise funds from depositors and wholesale markets in order to lend to households and businesses. Banks have been providing these services successfully for centuries. But today bankers are not interested in simple products – because they are more difficult to game.

Until that changes, the really important lesson of the global financial crisis is that it is bound to be repeated. The “great game” will never end.The Conversation

About the Author:

David Blake, Professor of Finance & Director of Pensions Institute, City, University of London

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Technical analysis for November 2022

Article By RoboForex.com

EURUSD, “Euro vs US Dollar”

The currency pair has completed a wave of growth to 1.0080 and a minimal correction to 0.9890. At the moment, the market is forming a consolidation range above this level. An escape downwards and extension of the range to 0.9800 are not excluded. Next, we expect a structure of growth to develop to 1.0155. The goal is estimated and local. After it is reached, a wave of correction to 0.9890 might begin.

EURUSD
Risk Warning: the result of previous trading operations do not guarantee the same results in the future

GBPUSD, “Great Britain Pound vs US Dollar”

The currency pair continues developing a consolidation range around 1.1315. At the moment, the market escaped the range upwards, reaching 1.1636. A technical test of 1.1315 from above is expected, followed by growth to 1.1680. After this level is reached, a wave of growth to 1.1020 is likely to begin.

GBPUSD
Risk Warning: the result of previous trading operations do not guarantee the same results in the future

USDJPY, “US Dollar vs Japanese Yen”

The pair has completed a wave of growth to 151.80 and the first impulse of decline to 146.13. Today the market has corrected to 148.99. Next, we expext a decline to 146.13. With a breakaway downwards, we will expect the wave of growth to continue to 143.08. The goal is estimated, local. Then growth to 146.00 should follow (a test from below). Next thing — a decline to 140.40. The goal is first.

USDJPY
Risk Warning: the result of previous trading operations do not guarantee the same results in the future

BRENT

Crude oil completed a wave of decline to 88.88. Practically, the correction is over. At the moment, the market is forming one more wave of growth to 101.70. The goal is first. Then correction to 92.70 might develop, after which we should expect growth to 105.77.

BRENT
Risk Warning: the result of previous trading operations do not guarantee the same results in the future

XAUUSD, “Gold vs US Dollar”

Gold performer a wave of decline to 1618.40 and a link of growth to 1674.00. With a bounce off 1674.00 downwards, the wave of growth is continuing to 1618.00. We expect a breakaway of this level downwards and trend continuation to 1565.05. After this level is reached, we expect the wave of growth to 1777.70 to begin.

GOLD
Risk Warning: the result of previous trading operations do not guarantee the same results in the future

S&P 500

The stock index completed a wave of growth to 3866.6. At the moment, the market is forming a consolidation range around it. The range might extend to 3950.0. Then the wave of decline might continue to 3679.3. In case it is broken away, the trend might continue down to 3400.0.

S&P 500

Article By RoboForex.com

Attention!
Forecasts presented in this section only reflect the author’s private opinion and should not be considered as guidance for trading. RoboForex LP bears no responsibility for trading results based on trading recommendations described in these analytical reviews.

Australian dollar grew after RBA decision. Overview for 01.11.2022

Article By RoboForex.com

On Tuesday, the Australian dollar started growing against the US counterpart. The current quote is 0.6419.

At the meeting the Reserve Bank of Australia lifted the interest rate to 2.85% annual from 2.60% previously. This decision was anticipated, and this increase by 25 base points goes in line with the previously voiced RBA policy. This is the seventh increase in a row, so the interest rate has reached the high since April 2013. It seems that the rate is likely to keep growing: the RBA might go on raising it to hold back inflation.

In the comments, the Australian regulator mentioned that the growth of the interest rate is necessary for forming a good balance of supply and demand inside the economic system.

According to RBA expectations, inflation will reach the peak in Q4, hitting 8.00%. In 2023, average CPI is expected to be 4.75%, and in 2024 – 3.00%.

For the Aussie, all said above is a positive supportive factor.

Article By RoboForex.com

Attention!
Forecasts presented in this section only reflect the author’s private opinion and should not be considered as guidance for trading. RoboForex LP bears no responsibility for trading results based on trading recommendations described in these analytical reviews.

The Analytical Overview of the Main Currency Pairs on 2022.11.01

By JustMarkets

The EUR/USD currency pair

Technical indicators of the currency pair:
  • Prev Open: 0.9964
  • Prev Close: 0.9881
  • % chg. over the last day: -0.84 %

The annual inflation rate in the Eurozone reached 10.7%, against expectations of growth of 10.3%. The core consumer price level, which excludes food and energy prices, rose to 5.0% from 4.8%. Eurozone GDP growth slowed in the third quarter, with business activity indices suggesting further declines. Energy prices continue to drive inflation, adding 4.2% to overall inflation in October. Meanwhile, inflation expectations for 2023 have also risen. All this indicates that it is too early for the ECB to slow down the pace of monetary policy tightening, and it is likely that Europe’s Central Bank will again have to aggressively raise interest rates by 0.75% at its next meeting. And that will slow down business activity in the region even more.

Trading recommendations
  • Support levels: 0.9873, 0.9835, 0.9755, 0.9601
  • Resistance levels: 0.9924, 1.0055, 1.0111, 1.0162, 1.0230

From the technical point of view, the trend on the EUR/USD currency pair on the hourly time frame is bullish. The price is trading at the level of the moving averages, but the correction is close to the end. The MACD indicator is in the negative zone, but sellers’ pressure is weak due to the presence of divergence. Under such market conditions, buy trades should be considered from the support level 0.9873, but with additional confirmation, as the level has already been tested. Sell deals can be considered from the resistance level of 0.9924, but also with confirmation.

Alternative scenario: if the price breaks down through the support level of 0.9834 and fixes below it, the downtrend will likely resume.

EUR/USD
News feed for 2022.11.01:
  • – US ISM Manufacturing PMI (m/m) at 16:00 (GMT+2);
  • – US JOLTs Job Openings (m/m) at 16:00 (GMT+2).

The GBP/USD currency pair

Technical indicators of the currency pair:
  • Prev Open: 1.1616
  • Prev Close: 1.1465
  • % chg. over the last day: -1.32 %

The pound fell by 1.3% against the dollar yesterday. The Bank of England is likely to raise rates by 75 basis points at Thursday’s meeting, although analysts say long-term rate expectations are under continued pressure. Bank of England deputy governor Ben Broadbent suggested that the cost of borrowing, as assessed by investors, would hit the UK economy. Noting that, he doubted that the UK could do a “soft landing” or, in other words, bring inflation back to the target level without significantly damaging the real economy.

Trading recommendations
  • Support levels: 1.1466, 1.1337, 1.1172, 1.1093, 1.0915, 1.0817
  • Resistance levels: 1.1578, 1.1698, 1.1816, 1.1901

From the technical point of view, the trend on the GBP/USD currency pair on the hourly time frame is bullish. The price is trading at the level of the moving averages. The MACD indicator is negative, but there is still buying pressure. Under such market conditions, buy trades can be considered from the support level of 1.1466 or 1.1337, but better after confirmation. Sell trades are best sought on intraday time frames, the nearest resistance level is 1.1578, but also better with confirmation in the form of a reverse initiative.

Alternative scenario: if the price breaks down of the 1.1172 support level and fixes below it, the downtrend will likely resume.

GBP/USD
News feed for 2022.11.01:
  • – UK Manufacturing PMI (m/m) at 11:30 (GMT+2).

The USD/JPY currency pair

Technical indicators of the currency pair:
  • Prev Open: 147.41
  • Prev Close: 148.75
  • % chg. over the last day: +0.90 %

Japan’s Finance Ministry said Monday that it spent a record $42.8 billion in currency intervention in October to support the yen. The currency intervention has temporarily strengthened the Japanese currency. Still, the fundamental picture remains the same: the Bank of Japan does not intend to abandon its soft monetary policy until spring 2023, while the US Federal Reserve is in a cycle of tightening and rising interest rates. Even if the US Fed cuts the pace of increases, the interest rate differential will still widen, putting negative pressure on the yen.

Trading recommendations
  • Support levels: 147.99, 146.64, 145.50, 144.91, 144.19, 143.00
  • Resistance levels: 148.82, 147.75, 148.64, 148.64, 150.00, 151.05

From the technical point of view, the medium-term trend on the currency pair USD/JPY is bearish. The price is trading at the level of the moving averages. The MACD indicator has become positive, but the buyers’ pressure is decreasing. Under such market conditions, traders can look for buy trades on the intraday time frames from support at 147.99 or 146.64, but only after the confirmation. Sell deals can be sought from the resistance level of 148.82, but only with additional confirmation, as the level has already been tested.

Alternative scenario: If the price fixes above 150.00, the uptrend will likely resume.

USD/JPY
News feed for 2022.11.01:
  • – Japan Manufacturing PMI (m/m) at 02:30 (GMT+2).

The USD/CAD currency pair

Technical indicators of the currency pair:
  • Prev Open: 1.3605
  • Prev Close: 1.3619
  • % chg. over the last day: +0.10 %

The Canadian dollar is a commodity currency and is highly dependent on the movements of the dollar Index as well as oil price movements. Monthly government data showed that US oil production rose to nearly 12 million BPD in August, the highest since the COVID-19 pandemic. With new blockages in China indicating weak demand, oil prices are declining, negatively affecting the Canadian dollar. But analysts’ medium-term forecasts suggest that oil prices will rise as OPEC+ will cut production in November. This could give a boost to the Canadian dollar, but it should be noted that a substantial increase in energy prices could trigger a new round of higher inflation.

Trading recommendations
  • Support levels: 1.3542, 1.35000, 1.3454
  • Resistance levels: 1.3610, 1.3597, 1.3679, 1.3795, 1.3855, 1.3968.

From the point of view of technical analysis, the trend on the USD/CAD currency pair is bearish. The price is trading at the level of moving averages, wide-volatility balance is formed. The MACD indicator has become negative, there is slight seller pressure. For sell deals, it is best to consider the resistance level of 1.3609, but only after the additional confirmation. Buy trades should be considered on the lower time frames from the support level of 1.3542, but it is also better after confirmation.

Alternative scenario: if the price breaks out and consolidates above the resistance level of 1.3855, the uptrend will likely resume.

USD/CAD
News feed for 2022.11.01:
  • – Canada Manufacturing PMI (m/m) at 15:30 (GMT+2).

By JustMarkets

 

This article reflects a personal opinion and should not be interpreted as an investment advice, and/or offer, and/or a persistent request for carrying out financial transactions, and/or a guarantee, and/or a forecast of future events.