“The desire for gold is the most universal and deeply rooted commercial instinct of the human race.” – Gerald M. Loeb

Gerald M. Loeb was a founding partner of the famous brokerage house E.F. Hutton, where he honed his skills as a Wall Street trader and investment banker. Having survived the 1929 market crash, that experience marred him for life, creating an investment style that involved “never holding a stock position for the long-term.”

He wrote the book that I have read cover-to-cover three times in forty-five years, The Battle for Investment Survival, which emphasized the concept of cutting losses quickly and letting profits “ride” as a surefire strategy for above-average performance and risk control. It is also in direct contravention of the Benjamin Graham/Warren Buffet rules of investment engagement that dictate that value investors buy and hold securities for longer-term periods.

Loeb’s quote at the top of this page joins the famous quote by J.P. Morgan, “Gold is money; everything else is credit.” in defining how these two merchants of the 1900’s bond and stock markets viewed the one asset that today’s Wall Street mavens view as a “barbarous relic.”

As gold moves to escape velocity above the magical USD $2,500/oz. level, and the SPDR Gold Shares ETF (GLD:NYSE) hits an all-time high this morning, it is instructive to sit back and ponder the remarks of two titans of finance when it comes to their view on gold’s utility within portfolios.

The current Wall Street narrative is now dominated with this nagging debate over the Fed’s next course of action. The “stocks for the long-term” spin machine has done such a wonderful job of training the portfolio managers to drool uncontrollably at the mere mention of rate cuts, it is as if Pavlov has forgotten to ring the bell for a solid week in front of a cage of ravenous, starving canines.

It seems like it was just yesterday that the world was on the brink of a total self-immolation of the banking system thanks to the unbridled overindulgence in leverage everywhere that a commission fee could be levied. The GFC of 2008 was followed by bailout after bailout, replete with outsized bonus pools for all that participated in the sub-prime scam. No jail time, no convictions, and zero regulatory reprimand for any of the architects of the largest public swindle of taxpayer money in the history of the planet.

Yet without mention anywhere amongst the legions of “expert commentators” in the financial media is the fact that gold bullion purchased in January 2003 has outperformed the S&P 500 by a margin of 615% to 529%.

Why is that?

Well, let us start with the fee structure. It is no secret that recommending that a client go on a monthly investment plan for gold involves no rotation, and in the world of Wall Street “comp,” there are much larger fees for turning a client’s portfolio over three or four times a year especially when in-house products with big fat underwriting fees are included. Also, investment banking is a huge source of revenue for Wall Street banks like Goldman or JP Morgan, and again, it is no mystery that “paper” products like IPOs are easier with which to conjure up financial wizardry with huge built-in fees that are geared around “sophistication” (more appropriately called “the ability to confuse and confound“) as they bundle up various layers of credit risk to resemble an AAA-rated security.

You simply cannot do that with a metal that carries the periodic number “79.” In reality, if you really backed out all the fees generated within the perimeter of the S&P 500 realm of companies by the Wall Street geniuses, that 529% for the S&P return would probably be half that number.

In a fit of forlorn reasoning, I decided back in May that I would refrain from adding to my gold holdings until mid-August, a practice that I have used frequently in setting up a year-end portfolio structure that captures gold’s seasonality trade. Because I had my head buried in a seemingly enlightened crevice of self-certainty and intransigence, I anchored the notion that just because I thought it made sense, it just had to happen.

Well, a month ago, I woke up to the reality that gold had decided that perhaps — just perhaps — the “analyst” from Port Perry was going to get left summarily behind in his maniacal quest to pick gold off in the $2,250-2,300 range or the GLD in the $200-205 range before new highs could be possibly achieved.

Alas, as usually happens, I forgot the “Twainian” Rule that goes something like this: “It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble’; it’s what you know for sure that turns out to be not exactly so.”

I knew “for sure” that gold would bottom in mid-August, and luckily, my hedges on GLD were modest at best, and they did not exactly get me “into trouble.” What it represented was more of an opportunity cost more than a financial cost with a smattering of reputational embarrassment thrown in. Nevertheless, as the famous quote by Martin Zweig goes, “It’s OK to be wrong; it’s unforgivable to stay wrong.”

GLD has moved to an all-time high today (which is the exact definition of the term “mid-August) with a move to $231.10, surpassing the prior high of $229.65 last seen on July 17.

Silver

iShares Silver Trust (ETF) (SLV:NYSE), by contrast, has failed to come anywhere near its 2022 high of $29.56, last seen on May 20. Using the GLD:SLV to arrive at the gold-silver ratio, the GSR is now at 88.30 up from 74, which marked the May low for that very important ratio. The GSR is the concrete that bonds together all aspects of the gold-silver bull thesis because (and I know you are all rolling your eyes) without this ratio making new lows as the precious metals advance, any rally is doomed. Silver is the speculative spark that ignites the animal spirits that drive the precious metals shares which in turn drives the retail public into the explorers and developers where most of the leverage is contained. To attract the interest (and dollars) of the wild-eyed speculator, there needs to be a “hook.”

Silver fills that roll.

Just as most of the tried-and-true rules surrounding stocks are now prehistoric drivel thanks largely to the predominance of the algobots, it is entirely possible that gold can continue to outperform silver right through $3,000/ounce driven by the current narrative that the main buyers of the precious metals are central banks where record after record continues to be broken in terms of physical offtake.

No such offtake is occurring in the silver arena. Only industrial and investment demand (primarily from retail) drives silver, and thus far, that has been insufficient to replace the sheer volume of central bank buying in the yellow metal. Hence, I have stuck to gold and copper as my top metals to own for the past decade.

Copper

Speaking of the copper market, I have been typing away since the Nikkei “carry trade crash” on August 5, urging subscribers to replace all of the copper names they sold back in May when copper broke below $4.00/lb. bottoming in the $3.92/lb. range joining stocks in that Monday rout.

Copper just initiated a bullish MACD crossover and is now on a “buy signal,” as is the money flow indicator. RSI at 48.73 provides considerable runway for price before it approaches overbought territory so these momentum indicators are pretty powerful reasons to own the red metal.

As for target prices, the 50-dma at $4.33/lb. and the 100-dma at $4.42 will probably cap the advance but if they are taken out, what now must be classified as a “bear market rally” will be reclassified as a “bull market resumption” and the negative implications of the 24.6% correction from the May highs get thrown overboard.

Fundamentals for copper remain strongly bullish, with the most recent comment by RBC being retweeted by Ivanhoe Mines founder Robert Friedland. “An attractive entry point for <copper> equities”  is exactly what I have been hammering since the August 5 flush with my number one portfolio move in months being the replacement of all stock and call option positions in Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX:NYSE).