Archive for Financial News – Page 216

The ECB and the US Federal Reserve are planning to raise rates this week

By JustMarkets

At the closing of the stock market on Friday, the Dow Jones (US30) gained 0.80% (+0.87% for the week), and S&P 500 (US500) increased by 0.83% (+0.91% for the week). The NASDAQ Technology Index (US100) gained 0.69% (+1.44% for the week).

The Personal Consumption Price (PCE) Index, excluding food and energy, the Fed’s preferred measure of core inflation, was up 0.3% in March from the previous month. The PCE price data, especially with rising labor costs, support projections that Fed policymakers will raise the benchmark interest rate by another quarter percentage point at this week’s meeting. Fed officials and markets remain at odds over the future trajectory of interest rates, with the Central Bank expecting interest rates to remain at current levels through 2023, while investors are betting on lower rates by the end of the year. Given renewed signs of stress in the banking sector in recent days, as well as problems at First Republic Bank (FRC), Fed officials may signal a pause in June.

Equity markets in Europe traded flat on Friday. German DAX (DE30) gained 0.74% (+0.44% for the week), French CAC 40 (FR40) added 0.10% (-0.72% for the week), Spanish IBEX 35 (ES35) decreased by 0.79% (-1.52% for the week), British FTSE 100 (UK100) closed on Friday in the plus 0.50% (-0.55% for the week).

According to current prices, there is a 78% chance the ECB will raise interest rates by 25 bps this week. But much will depend on the inflation data coming out on Tuesday (CPI) and Wednesday (PPI). The main focus is on core CPI inflation. If this indicator shows signs of growth, the ECB might go back to the 0.5% step at the May meeting. But it should be noted that Eurozone GDP fell by 0.1% for the last quarter, indicating that high-interest rates are already starting to slow economic growth.

On Friday, the International Monetary Fund urged the ECB to keep raising interest rates until mid-2024 and European Union finance ministers to tighten fiscal policy as part of a concerted effort to reduce high inflation.

The Swiss National Bank (SNB) is demanding an overhaul of banking regulations after the collapse of Credit Suisse. Future regulations will force banks to hold sufficient assets that can be pledged as collateral so that existing liquidity facilities can be used. This would allow the central bank to provide the necessary liquidity without having to pass emergency legislation.

The World Bank yesterday published its latest Commodity Market Outlook report for 2023. Energy prices are projected to average $84 per barrel this year. Also, over the weekend, it became known that OPEC+ countries plan to reduce production levels further ahead of the summer to support black gold prices.

Asian markets traded flat last week. Japan’s Nikkei 225 (JP225) gained 0.78% over the week, China’s FTSE China A50 (CHA50) gained 2.22%, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng (HK50) ended the week down by 0.77%, India’s NIFTY 50 (IND50) jumped by 2.31%, and Australia’s S&P/ASX 200 (AU200) decreased by 0.73%.

The Bank of Japan forecasts a slowdown in inflation to 1.6% in fiscal year 2025 and said the risks to that price outlook have been shifted downward. The Bank of Japan (BOJ) kept interest rates ultra-low on Friday but announced a plan to review its past monetary policy moves.

China’s manufacturing activity unexpectedly declined in April, adding to problems for the economy in the midst of a mixed recovery from COVID-19 with sluggish global demand and a still fragile domestic real estate sector. The official manufacturing purchasing managers’ index (PMI) was 49.2, down from 51.9 in March. Taiwan’s economy plunged into recession after contracting at its fastest pace since the global financial crisis. The 3.02% drop is the sharpest since the end of the quarter in June 2009, highlighting the difficult outlook for the trade-dependent economy. Singapore’s core inflation, a key indicator tracked by the central bank, slowed for the first time since October.

In the commodities market, futures on sugar (+8.34%) and natural gas (+7.39%) showed the biggest gains last week. Futures on palladium (-6.49%), wheat (-5.87%), corn (-5.04%), platinum (-4.41%), lumber (-4.04%), and coffee (-2.98%) showed the biggest drops.

S&P 500 (F) (US500) 4,169.48 +34.13 (+0.83%)

Dow Jones (US30)34,098.16 +272.00 (+0.80%)

DAX (DE40) 15,922.38  +121.93 (+0.77%)

FTSE 100 (UK100) 7,870.57 +38.99 (+0.50%)

USD Index 101.67 +0.17 +0.17%

Important events for today:
  • – Japan Manufacturing PMI (m/m) at 01:00 (GMT+3);
  • – Canada Manufacturing PMI (m/m) at 16:30 (GMT+3);
  • – US ISM Manufacturing PMI (m/m) at 17:00 (GMT+3).

By JustMarkets

 

This article reflects a personal opinion and should not be interpreted as an investment advice, and/or offer, and/or a persistent request for carrying out financial transactions, and/or a guarantee, and/or a forecast of future events.

COT Stock Market Charts: Weekly Speculator Changes led by Russell & Nasdaq

By InvestMacro

Here are the latest charts and statistics for the Commitment of Traders (COT) data published by the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

The latest COT data is updated through Tuesday April 25th and shows a quick view of how large traders (for-profit speculators and commercial entities) were positioned in the futures markets.

Weekly Speculator Changes led by Russell-Mini & Nasdaq-Mini

The COT stock markets speculator bets were lower this week as two out of the seven stock markets we cover had higher positioning while the other six markets had lower speculator contracts.

Leading the gains for the stock markets was the Russell-Mini (7,043 contracts) with the Nasdaq-Mini (2,457 contracts) also showing a positive week.

The markets with the declines in speculator bets this week were the S&P500-Mini (-19,010 contracts), the VIX (-18,089 contracts), MSCI EAFE-Mini (-2,041 contracts), DowJones-Mini (-1,276 contracts) and with the Nikkei 225 (-16 contracts) also registering lower bets on the week.


Data Snapshot of Stock Market Traders | Columns Legend
Apr-25-2023OIOI-IndexSpec-NetSpec-IndexCom-NetCOM-IndexSmalls-NetSmalls-Index
S&P500-Mini2,265,79420-363,2670386,640100-23,37322
Nikkei 22512,3746-2,572611,8064176638
Nasdaq-Mini247,654395,130783,46929-8,59937
DowJones-Mini99,21762-25,673832,600100-6,92710
VIX370,16375-81,8506082,90635-1,05690
Nikkei 225 Yen44,218295,4665115,71154-21,17735

 


Strength Scores led by Nasdaq-Mini & Nikkei 225

COT Strength Scores (a normalized measure of Speculator positions over a 3-Year range, from 0 to 100 where above 80 is Extreme-Bullish and below 20 is Extreme-Bearish) showed that the Nasdaq-Mini (78 percent) and the Nikkei 225 (61 percent) lead the stock markets this week. The VIX (60 percent) comes in as the next highest in the weekly strength scores.

On the downside, the S&P500-Mini (0 percent) and the DowJones-Mini (8 percent) come in at the lowest strength level currently and is in Extreme-Bearish territory (below 20 percent).

Strength Statistics:
VIX (59.6 percent) vs VIX previous week (72.9 percent)
S&P500-Mini (0.0 percent) vs S&P500-Mini previous week (3.2 percent)
DowJones-Mini (8.1 percent) vs DowJones-Mini previous week (11.5 percent)
Nasdaq-Mini (77.9 percent) vs Nasdaq-Mini previous week (76.5 percent)
Russell2000-Mini (40.7 percent) vs Russell2000-Mini previous week (36.5 percent)
Nikkei USD (61.3 percent) vs Nikkei USD previous week (61.4 percent)
EAFE-Mini (21.4 percent) vs EAFE-Mini previous week (23.9 percent)

 

Nasdaq-Mini tops the 6-Week Strength Trends

COT Strength Score Trends (or move index, calculates the 6-week changes in strength scores) showed that the Nasdaq-Mini (6.5 percent) leads the past six weeks trends and is the only positive mover for the stock markets this week.

The S&P500-Mini (-41 percent) leads the downside trend scores currently with the MSCI EAFE-Mini (-29 percent) coming in as the next market with lower trend scores.

Strength Trend Statistics:
VIX (-14.9 percent) vs VIX previous week (-1.3 percent)
S&P500-Mini (-40.6 percent) vs S&P500-Mini previous week (-22.5 percent)
DowJones-Mini (-14.7 percent) vs DowJones-Mini previous week (-30.8 percent)
Nasdaq-Mini (6.5 percent) vs Nasdaq-Mini previous week (8.4 percent)
Russell2000-Mini (-1.7 percent) vs Russell2000-Mini previous week (-5.2 percent)
Nikkei USD (-1.1 percent) vs Nikkei USD previous week (4.8 percent)
EAFE-Mini (-29.3 percent) vs EAFE-Mini previous week (-14.1 percent)


Individual Stock Market Charts:

VIX Volatility Futures:

VIX Volatility Futures COT ChartThe VIX Volatility large speculator standing this week was a net position of -81,850 contracts in the data reported through Tuesday. This was a weekly lowering of -18,089 contracts from the previous week which had a total of -63,761 net contracts.

This week’s current strength score (the trader positioning range over the past three years, measured from 0 to 100) shows the speculators are currently Bullish with a score of 59.6 percent. The commercials are Bearish with a score of 35.5 percent and the small traders (not shown in chart) are Bullish-Extreme with a score of 90.4 percent.

VIX Volatility Futures StatisticsSPECULATORSCOMMERCIALSSMALL TRADERS
– Percent of Open Interest Longs:19.654.26.8
– Percent of Open Interest Shorts:41.731.87.1
– Net Position:-81,85082,906-1,056
– Gross Longs:72,595200,74725,269
– Gross Shorts:154,445117,84126,325
– Long to Short Ratio:0.5 to 11.7 to 11.0 to 1
NET POSITION TREND:
– Strength Index Score (3 Year Range Pct):59.635.590.4
– Strength Index Reading (3 Year Range):BullishBearishBullish-Extreme
NET POSITION MOVEMENT INDEX:
– 6-Week Change in Strength Index:-14.912.019.1

 


S&P500 Mini Futures:

SP500 Mini Futures COT ChartThe S&P500 Mini large speculator standing this week was a net position of -363,267 contracts in the data reported through Tuesday. This was a weekly decline of -19,010 contracts from the previous week which had a total of -344,257 net contracts.

This week’s current strength score (the trader positioning range over the past three years, measured from 0 to 100) shows the speculators are currently Bearish-Extreme with a score of 0.0 percent. The commercials are Bullish-Extreme with a score of 100.0 percent and the small traders (not shown in chart) are Bearish with a score of 22.0 percent.

S&P500 Mini Futures StatisticsSPECULATORSCOMMERCIALSSMALL TRADERS
– Percent of Open Interest Longs:9.277.110.6
– Percent of Open Interest Shorts:25.260.111.6
– Net Position:-363,267386,640-23,373
– Gross Longs:207,3331,747,428240,239
– Gross Shorts:570,6001,360,788263,612
– Long to Short Ratio:0.4 to 11.3 to 10.9 to 1
NET POSITION TREND:
– Strength Index Score (3 Year Range Pct):0.0100.022.0
– Strength Index Reading (3 Year Range):Bearish-ExtremeBullish-ExtremeBearish
NET POSITION MOVEMENT INDEX:
– 6-Week Change in Strength Index:-40.630.18.6

 


Dow Jones Mini Futures:

Dow Jones Mini Futures COT ChartThe Dow Jones Mini large speculator standing this week was a net position of -25,673 contracts in the data reported through Tuesday. This was a weekly fall of -1,276 contracts from the previous week which had a total of -24,397 net contracts.

This week’s current strength score (the trader positioning range over the past three years, measured from 0 to 100) shows the speculators are currently Bearish-Extreme with a score of 8.1 percent. The commercials are Bullish-Extreme with a score of 100.0 percent and the small traders (not shown in chart) are Bearish-Extreme with a score of 10.1 percent.

Dow Jones Mini Futures StatisticsSPECULATORSCOMMERCIALSSMALL TRADERS
– Percent of Open Interest Longs:23.063.811.4
– Percent of Open Interest Shorts:48.930.918.4
– Net Position:-25,67332,600-6,927
– Gross Longs:22,82963,28111,297
– Gross Shorts:48,50230,68118,224
– Long to Short Ratio:0.5 to 12.1 to 10.6 to 1
NET POSITION TREND:
– Strength Index Score (3 Year Range Pct):8.1100.010.1
– Strength Index Reading (3 Year Range):Bearish-ExtremeBullish-ExtremeBearish-Extreme
NET POSITION MOVEMENT INDEX:
– 6-Week Change in Strength Index:-14.712.3-2.4

 


Nasdaq Mini Futures:

Nasdaq Mini Futures COT ChartThe Nasdaq Mini large speculator standing this week was a net position of 5,130 contracts in the data reported through Tuesday. This was a weekly increase of 2,457 contracts from the previous week which had a total of 2,673 net contracts.

This week’s current strength score (the trader positioning range over the past three years, measured from 0 to 100) shows the speculators are currently Bullish with a score of 77.9 percent. The commercials are Bearish with a score of 28.6 percent and the small traders (not shown in chart) are Bearish with a score of 37.3 percent.

Nasdaq Mini Futures StatisticsSPECULATORSCOMMERCIALSSMALL TRADERS
– Percent of Open Interest Longs:26.257.614.2
– Percent of Open Interest Shorts:24.156.217.7
– Net Position:5,1303,469-8,599
– Gross Longs:64,807142,70735,188
– Gross Shorts:59,677139,23843,787
– Long to Short Ratio:1.1 to 11.0 to 10.8 to 1
NET POSITION TREND:
– Strength Index Score (3 Year Range Pct):77.928.637.3
– Strength Index Reading (3 Year Range):BullishBearishBearish
NET POSITION MOVEMENT INDEX:
– 6-Week Change in Strength Index:6.5-19.437.3

 


Russell 2000 Mini Futures:

Russell 2000 Mini Futures COT ChartThe Russell 2000 Mini large speculator standing this week was a net position of -52,119 contracts in the data reported through Tuesday. This was a weekly gain of 7,043 contracts from the previous week which had a total of -59,162 net contracts.

This week’s current strength score (the trader positioning range over the past three years, measured from 0 to 100) shows the speculators are currently Bearish with a score of 40.7 percent. The commercials are Bullish with a score of 62.8 percent and the small traders (not shown in chart) are Bearish-Extreme with a score of 9.7 percent.

Russell 2000 Mini Futures StatisticsSPECULATORSCOMMERCIALSSMALL TRADERS
– Percent of Open Interest Longs:11.683.33.9
– Percent of Open Interest Shorts:21.772.15.0
– Net Position:-52,11957,566-5,447
– Gross Longs:59,738428,83220,133
– Gross Shorts:111,857371,26625,580
– Long to Short Ratio:0.5 to 11.2 to 10.8 to 1
NET POSITION TREND:
– Strength Index Score (3 Year Range Pct):40.762.89.7
– Strength Index Reading (3 Year Range):BearishBullishBearish-Extreme
NET POSITION MOVEMENT INDEX:
– 6-Week Change in Strength Index:-1.74.6-16.4

 


Nikkei Stock Average (USD) Futures:

Nikkei Stock Average (USD) Futures COT ChartThe Nikkei Stock Average (USD) large speculator standing this week was a net position of -2,572 contracts in the data reported through Tuesday. This was a weekly decline of -16 contracts from the previous week which had a total of -2,556 net contracts.

This week’s current strength score (the trader positioning range over the past three years, measured from 0 to 100) shows the speculators are currently Bullish with a score of 61.3 percent. The commercials are Bearish with a score of 41.2 percent and the small traders (not shown in chart) are Bearish with a score of 37.9 percent.

Nikkei Stock Average Futures StatisticsSPECULATORSCOMMERCIALSSMALL TRADERS
– Percent of Open Interest Longs:20.147.432.5
– Percent of Open Interest Shorts:40.932.826.3
– Net Position:-2,5721,806766
– Gross Longs:2,4855,8674,022
– Gross Shorts:5,0574,0613,256
– Long to Short Ratio:0.5 to 11.4 to 11.2 to 1
NET POSITION TREND:
– Strength Index Score (3 Year Range Pct):61.341.237.9
– Strength Index Reading (3 Year Range):BullishBearishBearish
NET POSITION MOVEMENT INDEX:
– 6-Week Change in Strength Index:-1.13.0-4.4

 


MSCI EAFE Mini Futures:

MSCI EAFE Mini Futures COT ChartThe MSCI EAFE Mini large speculator standing this week was a net position of -18,693 contracts in the data reported through Tuesday. This was a weekly decline of -2,041 contracts from the previous week which had a total of -16,652 net contracts.

This week’s current strength score (the trader positioning range over the past three years, measured from 0 to 100) shows the speculators are currently Bearish with a score of 21.4 percent. The commercials are Bullish with a score of 74.1 percent and the small traders (not shown in chart) are Bearish with a score of 47.9 percent.

MSCI EAFE Mini Futures StatisticsSPECULATORSCOMMERCIALSSMALL TRADERS
– Percent of Open Interest Longs:7.189.52.8
– Percent of Open Interest Shorts:11.786.41.2
– Net Position:-18,69312,4906,203
– Gross Longs:28,394359,98011,143
– Gross Shorts:47,087347,4904,940
– Long to Short Ratio:0.6 to 11.0 to 12.3 to 1
NET POSITION TREND:
– Strength Index Score (3 Year Range Pct):21.474.147.9
– Strength Index Reading (3 Year Range):BearishBullishBearish
NET POSITION MOVEMENT INDEX:
– 6-Week Change in Strength Index:-29.341.6-52.1

 


Article By InvestMacroReceive our weekly COT Newsletter

*COT Report: The COT data, released weekly to the public each Friday, is updated through the most recent Tuesday (data is 3 days old) and shows a quick view of how large speculators or non-commercials (for-profit traders) were positioned in the futures markets.

The CFTC categorizes trader positions according to commercial hedgers (traders who use futures contracts for hedging as part of the business), non-commercials (large traders who speculate to realize trading profits) and nonreportable traders (usually small traders/speculators) as well as their open interest (contracts open in the market at time of reporting). See CFTC criteria here.

The Federal Reserve and the art of navigating a soft landing … when economic data sends mixed signals

By Christopher Decker, University of Nebraska Omaha 

With inflation easing and the U.S. economy cooling, is the Federal Reserve done raising interest rates? After all, gently bringing down the trajectory of prices without crashing the economy was the central bank’s objective when it began jacking up rates over a year ago.

Gross domestic product, the broadest measure of an economy’s output, expanded at an annual pace of a mere 1.1% in the first quarter, according to data released April 27, 2023 – down from 2.6% recorded in the final three months of 2022. And the latest consumer price data, from March, shows inflation slowing to 5% on an annualized basis, the least in about a year.

Unfortunately for consumers and businesses weary of soaring borrowing costs, the Fed’s not likely done hiking rates quite yet. Financial markets are predicting another quarter-point hike when the Fed meets for a two-day meeting that ends May 3, 2023. And there could be several more increases to come.

But this does raise another important question: With all the recent, often conflicting, data and narratives regarding inflation, bank failures and layoffs in the tech sector, is the Fed close to engineering the “soft landing” it’s been hoping for?

The economy zigs then zags

The GDP data is a mixed bag and provides some clues to the answer.

Overall, the recent GDP figures suggest a likely economic slowdown going forward, due largely to a drawdown in inventories – that is, rather than ordering new goods, companies are relying more on stuff currently in storage. Businesses seems more inclined to sell what is on hand rather than order up new products, likely in anticipation of a slowdown in consumption. And business investment declined 12.5% in the quarter.

At the same time, consumer spending, which represents about two-thirds of GDP, grew at a healthy 3.7% pace, and investment in equipment such as computers and robotics increased by 11.2% – though this category is quite volatile and could easily turn in subsequent quarters.

Other data also points to a slowdown, such as a decline in new orders for manufactured goods. This, combined with the drawdown in inventories in the GDP report, might suggest that businesses are anticipating a slowdown in demand for goods and services.

When we look at the labor market, while job increases have been strong – 334,000 over the past six months – job openings have been declining. After peaking at about 12 million in March 2022, openings dropped to about 9.9 million as of February, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Inflation: Is it high or low?

In terms of inflation, we can also see conflicting numbers.

The headline consumer price index has indeed slowed steadily since peaking in June 2022 at 9.1%. But the core preferred consumption index, the Fed’s favored measure of inflation, has remained stubbornly elevated. The latest data, released on April 28, 2023, showed the index, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, was up 4.6% in March from a year earlier and has barely budged in months.

Meanwhile, wages, which when rising can have a strong upward push on prices, climbed at an annualized 5.1% in the first quarter, also according to data released on April 28. That’s down from the peak of 5.7% in the second quarter of 2022 but is still about the fastest pace of wage gains in at least two decades.

More hikes to come

So what might all this suggest about Fed actions on interest rates?

The next meeting is scheduled to end on May 3, with the market odds greatly favoring another 0.25 percentage point increase – which would be the 10th straight hike since March 2022.

With the inflation rate still well above the Fed’s target of about 2%, combined with continued job growth and a low unemployment rate, the central bank is likely not done ratcheting up rates. I agree with the market odds pricing in a quarter-point hike for the May meeting. Future data will guide any future rate increases beyond that.

The good news is that, I believe, the larger rate increases are well in the past.

Landing softly – or at least mildly

That brings us back to the big question: How close is the Fed to sticking a soft landing, in which the U.S. economy manages to tame inflation without a recession?

Sadly, it’s too early to tell. Labor markets can be very volatile and political and international events – such as potential gridlock on debt ceiling talks or further escalations in the Ukraine War – can turn things upside down. That said, we are either looking at a mild recession or a growth recession.

What’s the difference? A growth recession signals a weak economy but not enough to significantly drive up unemployment – and that’s preferable to even a mild recession of multiple quarterly drops in GDP and much higher unemployment.

We just don’t know which is more likely. What I think is true now, though, is that, barring any catastrophic and unpredictable events, a severe recession has been avoided.The Conversation

About the Author:

Christopher Decker, Professor of Economics, University of Nebraska Omaha

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

 

Banking crises rooted in a system that rewards excessive risk-taking – as First Republic’s precarious situation shows

By Alexandra Digby, University of Rochester; Dollie Davis, Minerva Schools at KGI, and Robson Hiroshi Hatsukami Morgan, Minerva Schools at KGI 

First Republic Bank is on the brink of collapse, a victim of the panic that has roiled small and midsize banks since the failure of Silicon Valley Bank in March 2023.

Should First Republic fail, it would underscore how the impact of risky decisions at one bank can quickly spread into the broader financial system. It should also provide the impetus for policymakers and regulators to address a systemic problem that has plagued the banking industry from the savings and loan crisis of the 1980s to the financial crisis of 2008 to the recent turmoil following SVB’s demise: incentive structures that encourage excessive risk-taking.

The Federal Reserve’s top regulator seems to agree. On April 28, 2023, the central bank’s vice chair for supervision delivered a stinging report on the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank, blaming its failures on its weak risk management, as well as supervisory missteps.

We are professors of economics who study and teach the history of financial crises. In each of the financial upheavals since the 1980s, the common denominator was risk. Banks provided incentives that encouraged executives to take big risks to boost profits, with few consequences if their bets turned bad. In other words, all carrot and no stick.

One question we are grappling with now is what can be done to keep history from repeating itself and threatening the banking system, economy and jobs of everyday people.

S&L crisis sets the stage

The precursor to the banking crises of the 21st century was the savings and loan crisis of the 1980s.

The so-called S&L crisis, like the collapse of SVB, began in a rapidly changing interest rate environment. Savings and loan banks, also known as thrifts, provided home loans at attractive interest rates. When the Federal Reserve under Chairman Paul Volcker aggressively raised rates in the late 1970s to fight raging inflation, S&Ls were suddenly earning less on fixed-rate mortgages while having to pay higher interest to attract depositors. At one point, their losses topped US$100 billion.

To help the teetering banks, the federal government deregulated the thrift industry, allowing S&Ls to expand beyond home loans to commercial real estate. S&L executives were often paid based on the size of their institutions’ assets, and they aggressively lent to commercial real estate projects, taking on riskier loans to grow their loan portfolios quickly.

In the late 1980s, the commercial real estate boom turned bust. S&Ls, burdened by bad loans, failed in droves, requiring the federal government take over banks and delinquent commercial properties and sell the assets to recover money paid to insured depositors. Ultimately, the bailout cost taxpayers more than $100 billion.

Short-term incentives

The 2008 crisis is another obvious example of incentive structures that encourage risky strategies.

At all levels of mortgage financing – from Main Street lenders to Wall Street investment firms – executives prospered by taking excessive risks and passing them to someone else. Lenders passed mortgages made to people who could not afford them onto Wall Street firms, which in turn bundled those into securities to sell to investors. It all came crashing down when the housing bubble burst, followed by a wave of foreclosures.

Incentives rewarded short-term performance, and executives responded by taking bigger risks for immediate gains. At the Wall Street investment banks Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers, profits grew as the firms bundled increasingly risky loans into mortgage-backed securities to sell, buy and hold.

As foreclosures spread, the value of these securities plummeted, and Bear Stearns collapsed in early 2008, providing the spark of the financial crisis. Lehman failed in September of that year, paralyzing the global financial system and plunging the U.S. economy into the worst recession since the Great Depression.

Executives at the banks, however, had already cashed in, and none were held accountable. Researchers at Harvard University estimated that top executive teams at Bear Stearns and Lehman pocketed a combined $2.4 billion in cash bonuses and stock sales from 2000 to 2008.

A familiar ring

That brings us back to Silicon Valley Bank.

Executives tied up the bank’s assets in long-term Treasury and mortgage-backed securities, failing to protect against rising interest rates that would undermine the value of these assets. The interest rate risk was particularly acute for SVB, since a large share of depositors were startups, whose finances depend on investors’ access to cheap money.

When the Fed began raising interest rates last year, SVB was doubly exposed. As startups’ fundraising slowed, they withdrew money, which required SVB to sell long-term holdings at a loss to cover the withdrawals. When the extent of SVB’s losses became known, depositors lost trust, spurring a run that ended with SVB’s collapse.

For executives, however, there was little downside in discounting or even ignoring the risk of rising rates. The cash bonus of SVB CEO Greg Becker more than doubled to $3 million in 2021 from $1.4 million in 2017, lifting his total earnings to $10 million, up 60% from four years earlier. Becker also sold nearly $30 million in stock over the past two years, including some $3.6 million in the days leading up to his bank’s failure.

The impact of the failure was not contained to SVB. Share prices of many midsize banks tumbled. Another American bank, Signature, collapsed days after SVB did.

First Republic survived after it was rescued by a consortium of major banks led by JPMorgan Chase, but the damage was already done. First Republic recently reported that depositors withdrew more than $100 billion in the six weeks following SVB’s collapse, and now it appears that it could soon fail too.

The crisis isn’t over yet. Banks had over $620 billion in unrealized losses at the end of 2022, largely due to rapidly rising interest rates.

The big picture

So, what’s to be done?

We believe the bipartisan bill recently filed in Congress, the Failed Bank Executives Clawback, would be a good start. In the event of a bank failure, the legislation would empower regulators to claw back compensation received by bank executives in the five-year period preceding the failure.

Clawbacks, however, kick in only after the fact. To prevent risky behavior, regulators could require executive compensation to prioritize long-term performance over short-term gains. And new rules could restrict the ability of bank executives to take the money and run, including requiring executives to hold substantial portions of their stock and options until they retire.

The Fed’s new report on what led to SVB’s failure points in this direction. The 102-page report recommends new limits on executive compensation, saying leaders “were not compensated to manage the bank’s risk,” as well as stronger stress-testing and higher liquidity requirements.

We believe these are also good steps, but probably not enough.

It comes down to this: Financial crises are less likely to happen if banks and bank executives consider the interest of the entire banking system, not just themselves, their institutions and shareholders.The Conversation

About the Authors:

Alexandra Digby, Adjunct Assistant professor of Economics, University of Rochester; Dollie Davis, Associate Dean of Faculty, Minerva Schools at KGI, and Robson Hiroshi Hatsukami Morgan, Assistant Professor of Social Sciences, Minerva Schools at KGI

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Banks’ demand for emergency loans could signal more rate hikes

By George Prior 

US banks continuing to increase emergency loans from the Federal Reserve will hinder attempts to cool inflation, giving the central bank more reason to continue interest rate hikes.

This is the stark warning from Nigel Green, the CEO of deVere Group, one of the world’s largest independent financial advisory, asset management and fintech organizations, as new data shows that banks’ demand for loans from the Fed increased for the second consecutive week.

The US central bank now has provided more than $155.2 billion in loans to financial institutions through two backstop lending programs since the string of bank collapses in March.

The deVere chief executive says: “The $25 billion Bank Term Funding Program, which offers banks loans of up to one year, is surely going to turn out to be inflationary.

“It’s increasing the balance sheet of the Federal Reserve at a time when it’s supposedly intent on trying to reduce it.

“The emergency borrowing program is, essentially, another form of quantitative easing, which, as we know, adds to inflationary pressures.”

He continues: “The increase in demand for loans from financial institutions demonstrates ongoing stress in the US financial system, and this together with the inflationary consequences of the emergency program, are likely to give the Fed more reason to continue with its tightening campaign, despite weaker-than-expected GDP data, which has some investors betting that the central bank could soon wrap up its current agenda.”

Earlier this week, Nigel Green said in a statement that he expects the Federal Reserve will raise interest rates once again at its upcoming May meeting and that this is likely to cause jitters in the market as some investors, concerned about short-term profits, will move into panic-selling mode.

“Furthermore, they will have legitimate concerns that further rate hikes now – when monetary policy time lags are notoriously long – could steer economies into a recession.”

The time lag in monetary policies is very high. Economists estimate interest rate changes take up to 18 months to have the full effect. This means monetary policymakers need to try and predict the state of the economy for up to 18 months ahead.

Nigel Green concludes: “The latest data showing banks increasing their emergency borrowings will give the Fed more excuse to continue with their tightening next week.”

About:

deVere Group is one of the world’s largest independent advisors of specialist global financial solutions to international, local mass affluent, and high-net-worth clients.  It has a network of more than 70 offices across the world, over 80,000 clients and $12bn under advisement.

The cryptocurrency market digest (BTC). Overview for 28.04.2023

By RoboForex.com

Investors remained unperturbed by the disappointing publication of the US GDP statistics for Q1 2023. The economy increased by 1.1%, two times less than expected. Today will also be tense: personal income and spending reports for March are scheduled for publication alongside the Core PCE inflation component.

Technically, the market still craves for securing above 29,800 USD. If so, the target for purchases at 30,000 USD will become easy to reach. The next targets lie in the range between 34,000-35,000 USD.

The capitalisation of the crypto market has increased to 1.210 trillion USD. The BTC part skyrocketed to 47.2%, while the ETH share remained at 19.0%.

California introduces a digital wallet for state services

Santa Cruz County (North California) reported the implementation of a blockchain-based digital wallet to be used in the frame of state services. Primarily, the system is used for digitalising paper documents, appointments, and services.

Google Cloud cooperates with Polygon

The Google Cloud platform signed an agreement with Polygon. This alliance can speed up the implementation of the key Polygon protocols into the corporate infrastructure and instruments.

CryptoSpotty was bought for 18 thousand USD

Primary sales of the CryptoSpotty token as a part of VKontakte NFT collection took just an hour to start and amounted to 18 thousand USD. 8 thousand NFTs were issued, featuring Spotty, the dog symbol of the social medium.

Article By RoboForex.com

Attention!
Forecasts presented in this section only reflect the author’s private opinion and should not be considered as guidance for trading. RoboForex LP bears no responsibility for trading results based on trading recommendations described in these analytical reviews.

The Bank of Japan maintained all monetary policy settings. META boosted the tech sector

By JustMarkets

The Nasdaq Technology Index led a rally on Wall Street Thursday as a strong report from parent company Facebook (META) outweighed concerns about slowing US economic growth. As the stock market closed yesterday, the Dow Jones Index (US30) increased by 1.57%, and the S&P 500 Index (US500) added 1.96%. The NASDAQ Technology Index (US100) jumped by 2.43%.

Meta stock soared more than 13% yesterday, hitting its highest in more than a year after the company reported quarterly earnings above estimates and CEO Mark Zuckerberg said artificial intelligence is driving traffic to Facebook and Instagram and boosting ad sales. First-quarter earnings expectations have improved sharply, with analysts forecasting a 2.4% year-over-year drop in S&P 500 companies’ earnings, compared with a 5.1% decline forecast at the start of the reporting season.

The US economic growth slowed more than expected in the first quarter of 2023. GDP data for the quarter showed growth of 1.1% compared to the forecast of 2.0%. The slowdown in GDP growth largely reflected weak inventory investment. Housing investment recorded its eighth consecutive quarterly decline, although the rate of decline slowed considerably from October through December. But the labor market remains resilient. Jobless claims came in at 230,000, less than the projected 247,000.

Equity markets in Europe were mostly up on Thursday. German DAX (DE30) gained 0.03%, French CAC 40 (FR40) added 0.23%, Spanish IBEX 35 (ES35) increased by 0.16%, and British FTSE 100 (UK100) closed yesterday down by 0.27%.

The ECB meeting will be held next week, and the main question is which rate hike the Central Bank of Europe will choose. At the moment, analysts are leaning towards 0.25%. However, it is worth realizing that the probability may change due to the new incoming data. A number of GDP and inflation statistics will be released in Europe today, and the Eurozone core inflation report will be released two days before the meeting next week. Any signs of solid inflation, especially the core indicator, will raise the odds of a 0.5% rate hike at the May meeting.

European commercial real estate investment has fallen to its lowest level in 11 years. Higher interest rates and the economic outlook spook investors. A recent JP Morgan investor survey cited commercial real estate as the most likely cause of the next financial crisis.

Oil prices stabilized Thursday, offsetting some losses from the previous session after OPEC+ indicated it saw no need to cut production further.

Asian markets were also mostly on the rise yesterday. Japan’s Nikkei 225 (JP225) gained 0.15%, China’s FTSE China A50 (CHA50) increased by 1.09%, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng (HK50) gained 0.42%, India’s NIFTY 50 (IND50) added 0.57%, and Australia’s S&P/ASX 200 (AU200) closed negative 0.32%.

Argentina is planning a sharp rate hike to 91% to stop the peso’s decline. Since Argentina’s inflation rate is above 100%, its Central Bank raised its rate last week by 300 basis points to 81%. Argentina, a major global supplier of grain and beef, is struggling with inflation, which topped 104% in March, with analysts predicting that prices will rise about 110-130% this year.

The Chinese yuan is slowly but surely being accepted for more international payments, which analysts say could set the stage for a trading system that runs parallel to the dominant US dollar. In March, there were more cross-border transactions with China in yuan than in dollars, and Argentina said it aims to pay for Chinese goods in yuan rather than dollars regularly.

The Bank of Japan left the interest rate unchanged and also did not change its yield curve control policy and is considering a comprehensive review of past monetary policy easing decisions. The policy report indicates that the abrupt move to roll back quantitative easing could create huge problems for Japan’s regional banks and exacerbate global market conditions. Tokyo’s consumer price index inflation rose more than expected in April, returning to 40-year highs. On an annualized basis, the core CPI rose to 3.5% from 3.2%. Japan’s unemployment rate rose from 2.6% to 2.8%.

S&P 500 (F) (US500) 4,135.35 +79.36 (+1.96%)

Dow Jones (US30)33,826.16 +524.29 (+1.57%)

DAX (DE40) 15,800.45 +4.72 (+0.03%)

FTSE 100 (UK100) 7,831.58 −21.06 (−0.27%)

USD Index 101.52 +0.05 +0.05%

Important events for today:
  • – Japan Tokyo Core CPI (m/m) at 02:30 (GMT+3);
  • – Japan Unemployment Rate (m/m) at 02:30 (GMT+3);
  • – Japan Industrial Production (m/m) at 02:50 (GMT+3);
  • – Japan Retail Sales (m/m) at 02:50 (GMT+3);
  • – Australia Producer Price Index (q/q) at 04:30 (GMT+3);
  • – Japan BoJ Monetary Policy Statement at 06:00 (GMT+3);
  • – Japan BoJ Interest Rate Decision at 06:00 (GMT+3);
  • – Japan BoJ Outlook Report at 06:00 (GMT+3);
  • – Japan BoJ Press Conference at 08:00 (GMT+3);
  • – French GDP (q/q) at 08:30 (GMT+3);
  • – French Consumer Price Index (m/m) at 09:45 (GMT+3);
  • – Spanish GDP (q/q) at 10:00 (GMT+3);
  • – Spanish Consumer Price Index (m/m) at 10:00 (GMT+3);
  • – German Unemployment Rate (m/m) at 10:55 (GMT+3);
  • – German GDP (q/q) at 11:00 (GMT+3);
  • – Switzerland SNB Chairman Thomas Jordan speaks at 11:00 (GMT+3);
  • – Eurozone GDP (q/q) at 11:00 (GMT+3);
  • – German Consumer Price Index (m/m) at 15:00 (GMT+3);
  • – US PCE Price Index (m/m) at 15:30 (GMT+3);
  • – Canada GDP (q/q) at 15:30 (GMT+3);
  • – US Michigan Consumer Sentiment (m/m) at 17:00 (GMT+3).

By JustMarkets

 

This article reflects a personal opinion and should not be interpreted as an investment advice, and/or offer, and/or a persistent request for carrying out financial transactions, and/or a guarantee, and/or a forecast of future events.

Market mood positive ahead of US data

By ForexTime 

It has certainly been a busy week for global financial markets thanks key economic data and earnings from some of the largest companies in the world.

Overall sentiment remains supported by upbeat results despite lingering worries about the U.S. banking sector. Stocks in Europe gained this morning after reversing losses while US equity futures are pointing to strong open. Interestingly, the encouraging first-quarter results from Microsoft, Alphabet, and Meta have failed to inspire Nasdaq bulls with the index down 1.5% this week. In the currency space, the dollar is on standby ahead of the US GDP and jobless claims data this afternoon. We see a similar theme on the yen ahead of the Bank of Japan (BoJ) rate decision on Friday, the first with new governor Kazuo Ueda. Looking at commodities, oil is stabilizing while gold seems to be waiting for a fresh fundamental spark.

With the new trading month around the corner, here are some potential setups to watch out for.

DXY to resume downtrend?

The Dollar Index (DXY) remains trapped within a range on the daily charts. Support can be found around the 100.80 regions and resistance at 102.00. A breakout could be on the horizon with the pending US economic data acting as a potential catalyst. Weakness below 100.82 could encourage a decline toward 100.46 and 100.00, respectively. Should prices break above 102.00, this may open the doors toward 103.00.

EURUSD capped below 1.1075?

Euro bulls have struggled to conquer the 1.1075 level on repeated occasions. Although the trend remains bullish, bears could jump back into the scene if prices slip back below 1.1000. Such a development may inspire a steeper decline towards 1.0910 and potentially lower. Should 1.1075 prove to be unreliable resistance, the next key level of interest can be found at 1.1150.

GBPUSD trapped within a range

A breakout could be pending on the GBPUSD. It has been same the old story for the currency pair with prices trading within a very wide range. Support can be found at 1.2380 and resistance around 1.2500. Should prices slip back below 1.2380, the next key level of interest can be found at 1.2200. A breakout above 1.2500 may signal an incline back towards 1.25457.

USDJPY waits on BoJ decision

Where the yen concludes this week may be influenced by the BoJ rate decision on Friday morning. The USDJPY is trading marginally below the 133.70 support level as of writing. Sustained weakness below this level could inspire a selloff towards 132.90. A move back above 133.70 could open the doors back towards 135.00 and 137.00 – where the 200-day SMA resides.

Commodity Spotlight – Gold

Gold remains trapped within a sticky range. Price action suggests that a fresh catalyst is needed to trigger a bullish or bearish breakout. A strong move above $2000 may inspire a push toward $2032 and $2048. If prices remain below $2000, gold could test $1950 and $1935.


Forex-Time-LogoArticle by ForexTime

ForexTime Ltd (FXTM) is an award winning international online forex broker regulated by CySEC 185/12 www.forextime.com

Gold returned to growth amid rising recession fears. Tech companies reports beat forecasts

By JustMarkets

Stronger-than-expected reports from tech companies Microsoft (MSFT) and Google Alphabet (GOOGL) helped improve investor sentiment in the tech sector. But weak economic data exacerbated recession fears in the world’s largest economy as rising recession risks threaten consumer spending. At the close of the stock market on Wednesday, the Dow Jones Index (US30) decreased by 0.68%, and the S&P 500 Index (US500) fell by 0.38%. The NASDAQ Technology Index (US100) gained 0.47% yesterday.

Shares of Activision Blizzard (ATVI), the largest video game maker, plummeted more than 10% after the UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) blocked the acquisition of Activision Blizzard by Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The regulator fears that the deal could lead to a significant decrease in competition in the markets for game consoles, subscriptions, and cloud computing.

Alphabet (GOOGL) Inc. reported better-than-expected first-quarter results and a $70 billion stock buyback plan. Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) gained 7% after posting quarterly results that beat Wall Street estimates as its Azure cloud business performed better than expected. According to Refinitiv IBES, of 163 S&P 500 companies that reported first-quarter earnings, 79.8% beat analysts’ expectations.

Stock markets in Europe were mostly down Wednesday. German DAX (DE30) decreased by 0.48%, and French CAC 40 (FR40) lost 0.86%, Spanish IBEX35 (ES35) closed at the opening price, British FTSE100 (UK100) closed negative 0.49% yesterday.

The German government raised this year’s economic growth forecast to 0.4% from the previous forecast of 0.2%. Current economic indicators like industrial production, new orders, and business climate point to an economic recovery. Economists expect stagnation in the first quarter, followed by an acceleration in growth. For 2024, the government slightly lowered its growth forecast to plus 1.6% from plus 1.8%. Inflation forecasts have also been adjusted downward to 5.9% for 2023 and 2.7% for 2024. The government expects the unemployment rate to be 5.4% in 2023 and 5.2% in 2024, after 5.3% in 2022.

The US crude oil inventories fell last week by 5.1 million barrels to 460.9 million barrels. But oil continued its downward movement yesterday as recession fears outweighed the US inventory decline. Investors also expressed concern that potential interest rate hikes by central banks may slow economic growth and reduce energy demand in the United States, United Kingdom and the European Union.

Gold and silver prices are rising as US recession fears continue to rise. The US 2-10-year bond yield spreads remain heavily inverted, while US Treasury yields fell sharply yesterday as traders continue to count on a US rate cut later this year.

Asian markets traded flat yesterday. Japan’s Nikkei 225 (JP225) decreased by 0.71%, China’s FTSE China A50 (CHA50) was down by 0.03% for the day, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng (HK50) ended the day up 0.71%, India’s NIFTY 50 (IND50) added 0.25%, and Australia’s S&P/ASX 200 (AU200) closed negative by 0.08% for the day.

Last month the yuan became the most widely used currency for cross-border transactions in China, overtaking the dollar for the first time. Cross-border payments and receipts in yuan rose to a record $549.9 billion in March from $434.5 billion a month earlier. China has long promoted the use of the yuan to settle cross-border transactions as part of efforts to internationalize the use of its currency. The use of the yuan in global trade finance remains low, although it is showing strong growth. SWIFT data showed that the share of the yuan in global foreign exchange trade finance transactions rose to 4.5% in March, while the dollar accounted for 83.71%.

S&P 500 (F) (US500) 4,055.96 −15.67 (−0.38%)

Dow Jones (US30)33,301.87 −228.96 (−0.68%)

DAX (DE40) 15,795.73 −76.40 (−0.48%)

FTSE 100 (UK100) 7,852.64 −38.49 (−0.49%)

USD Index 101.86 +0.51 +0.50%

Important events for today:
  • – US GDP (q/q) at 15:30 (GMT+3);
  • – US Initial Jobless Claims (w/w) at 15:30 (GMT+3);
  • – US Pending Home Sales (m/m) at 17:00 (GMT+3);
  • – Natural Gas Storage (w/w) at 17:30 (GMT+3).

By JustMarkets

 

This article reflects a personal opinion and should not be interpreted as an investment advice, and/or offer, and/or a persistent request for carrying out financial transactions, and/or a guarantee, and/or a forecast of future events.

Corporate Bonds: “The Next Shoe to Drop”

“The neckline has been broken over the last few days”

By Elliott Wave International

A “calamity” is likely ahead for corporate bonds, says our head of global research, Murray Gunn.

Some of Murray’s analysis involves the head and shoulders, a classic technical chart pattern. In case you’re unfamiliar with it, here’s an illustration along with an explanation from one of our past publications:

A head-and-shoulders is a reversal pattern that consists of three price extremes. Market technicians refer to [them] as the left shoulder, head, and right shoulder. …it takes a break of the neckline to confirm a reversal… [and it’s] not just a bearish reversal formation. Inverted head-and-shoulders mark bottoms.

With that in mind, here’s a chart and commentary which Murray provided for the April Global Market Perspective, a monthly Elliott Wave International publication which covers 50-plus financial markets:

The chart … shows the relative performance of corporate bonds, as proxied by the iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ticker LQD) versus the iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF (ticker IEF). A distinct Head and Shoulders pattern exists where the neckline has been broken over the last few days. The corporate bond market has held in reasonably well over the last year, but we fully expect this sector to be the next shoe to drop.

Don’t count on the ratings services to provide timely warnings. In the past, downgraded ratings have sometimes come only after most if not all the damage was done.

Remember Enron? The company still had an “investment grade” rating just four days before it collapsed. Ratings services also missed the 1995 debacle at Barings Bank. Olympia and York of Canada is another historical example: the largest real estate developer in the world at the time had a AA rating on its debt in 1991. Less than a year later, it went bankrupt.

Getting back to the present, Murray Gunn also notes:

When … corporate loans are re-set this year, there are going to be a few deep breaths being taken, and more than a fair share of tightened sphincters!

And, speaking of chart patterns of financial markets, another way to monitor the bond market is to use Elliott wave analysis.

If you’d like to delve into the details of this method of analysis, read Frost & Prechter’s Wall Street classic, Elliott Wave Principle: Key to Market Behavior. Here’s a quote from the book:

If indeed markets are patterned, and if those patterns have a recognizable geometry, then regardless of the variations allowed, certain price and time relationships are likely to recur. In fact, experience shows that they do.

It is our practice to try to determine in advance where the next move will likely take the market. One advantage of setting a target is that it gives a sort of backdrop against which to monitor the market’s actual path. This way, you are alerted quickly when something is wrong and can shift your interpretation to a more appropriate one if the market does not do what you expect. The second advantage of choosing a target well in advance is that it prepares you psychologically for buying when others are selling out in despair, and selling when others are buying confidently in a euphoric environment.

If you’d like to read the entire online version of Elliott Wave Principle: Key to Market Behavior, you may do so for free once you become a member of Club EWI, the world’s largest Elliott wave educational community. A Club EWI membership is also free.

Join now by following this link: Elliott Wave Principle: Key to Market Behaviorget free and instant access.

This article was syndicated by Elliott Wave International and was originally published under the headline Corporate Bonds: “The Next Shoe to Drop”. EWI is the world’s largest market forecasting firm. Its staff of full-time analysts led by Chartered Market Technician Robert Prechter provides 24-hour-a-day market analysis to institutional and private investors around the world.