Archive for Economics & Fundamentals – Page 85

China is preparing a massive economic stimulus. The International Monetary Fund has lowered its GDP forecast for 2024

By JustMarkets

At Tuesday’s stock market close, the Dow Jones Index (US30) increased by 0.40%, while the S&P 500 Index (US500) added 0.52%. The NASDAQ Technology Index (US100) closed positive by 0.58% yesterday. All three indices hit their 2-week price highs. On Tuesday morning, stocks opened higher amid prospects of additional stimulus in China, which will favor global growth after Bloomberg reported that China is preparing for a new round of stimulus to support its economy. Stocks further extended gains after comments from FRB Atlanta President Bostic reinforced speculation that the Fed is about to take a pause in raising interest rates.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) warned of persistent inflation and urged the world’s central banks to maintain tight policy until price pressures ease, lowering its 2024 global GDP forecast to 2.9% from July’s forecast of 3.0% and raising its 2024 global inflation forecast to 5.8% from July’s forecast of 5.2%.

Equity markets in Europe were mostly up yesterday. Germany’s DAX (DE40) increased by 1.95%, France’s CAC 40 (FR40) gained 2.01% on Tuesday, Spain’s IBEX 35 (ES35) jumped by 2.19%, and the UK’s FTSE 100 (UK100) closed up by 1.82%. Eurozone economic news on Tuesday lent support to the euro after Italian industrial production unexpectedly rose by 0.2% m/m in August, exceeding expectations of a decrease by 0.3% m/m. ECB Governing Council spokesman Holzmann said yesterday that inflation needs to be kept under control, and supply shocks could force the ECB to raise interest rates one or two more times. This is a more hawkish stance than was previously the case.

Minutes from the Bank of England’s last monetary policy meeting showed that the UK Banking System remains strong enough to support households and businesses even if economic conditions are worse than we expect. The UK banking system has substantial capital reserves and other resources to cover potential losses or cash outflows. Participants believe that interest rates are likely to remain high for an extended period of time.

There was profit taking in crude oil after the IMF lowered its global GDP forecast for 2024. But losses in crude oil were limited by a weaker dollar and heightened fears that the conflict between Israel and Hamas could widen and disrupt crude oil supplies from the Middle East. In addition, the prospect of additional stimulus from China is supporting energy demand and oil prices.

Asian markets traded flat yesterday. Japan’s Nikkei 225 (JP225) was up by 2.43%, China’s FTSE China A50 (CHA50) decreased by 0.58%, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng (HK50) added 0.84%, and Australia’s ASX 200 (AU200) ended the day positive by 1.01%.

China is considering widening its budget deficit for 2023 as the government prepares for a new round of stimulus to help the economy reach its 5% growth target. Policymakers may issue an additional 1 trillion yuan ($137 billion) worth of government debt to finance infrastructure spending.

S&P 500 (F)(US500) 4,358.24 +22.58 (+0.52%)

Dow Jones (US30) 33,739.30 +134.65 (+0.40%)

DAX (DE40)  15,423.52 +295.41 (+1.95%)

FTSE 100 (UK100) 7,628.21 +136.00 (+1.82%)

USD Index  105.77 -0.31 (-0.29%)

News feed for 2023.10.11:
  • – US FOMC Member Daly Speaks at 01:00 (GMT+3);
  • – German Consumer Price Index (m/m) at 09:00 (GMT+3);
  • – US FOMC Member Bowman Speaks at 11:15 (GMT+3);
  • – US Producer Price Index (m/m) at 15:30 (GMT+3);
  • – Canada Building Permits (m/m) at 15:30 (GMT+3);
  • – US FOMC Member Bostic Speaks at 19:15 (GMT+3);
  • – US FOMC Meeting Minutes at 21:00 (GMT+3).

By JustMarkets

 

This article reflects a personal opinion and should not be interpreted as an investment advice, and/or offer, and/or a persistent request for carrying out financial transactions, and/or a guarantee, and/or a forecast of future events.

Oil rises amid concerns about lower supplies from the Middle East. Chinese stocks are showing weakness after the holidays

By JustMarkets

As of Monday’s stock market close, the Dow Jones Index (US30) added 0.59%, while the S&P 500 Index (US500) increased by 0.63%. The NASDAQ Technology Index (US100) closed positive by 1.60% yesterday. The S&P 500 (US500) and Nasdaq 100 (US100) indices rose to 2-week highs, while the Dow Jones Industrials (US30) reached a one-week-high. Stock indices rose on Monday amid dovish comments from the Federal Reserve, suggesting that the Fed may pause its rate hike cycle. Fed Vice Chairman Jefferson said policymakers are “in a position to proceed cautiously in assessing the degree of additional policy tightening that may be necessary” as the recent rise in Treasury bond yields acts as a potential additional constraint on the economy.

Another positive upside for equities is Monday’s 4% rise in crude oil prices, which sparked a rally in energy stocks. In addition, the surprise Hamas attack on Israel over the weekend contributed to a rally in defense stocks.

On Monday, the Bank of Israel announced its intention to sell up to $30 billion in foreign exchange reserves to support its national currency, which has fallen sharply since the weekend incursion by Hamas militants. The Israeli shekel traded at 3.90 against the US dollar yesterday, the weakest in seven years.

Equity markets in Europe were mostly down yesterday. Germany’s DAX (DE40) decreased by 0.67%, France’s CAC 40 (FR40) fell by 0.55% on Monday, Spain’s IBEX 35 (ES35) lost 0.91% and the UK’s FTSE 100 (UK100) closed down by 0.03%. German industrial production for August fell by 0.2% m/m, weaker than expectations of 0.1% m/m.

Hamas’ attack on Israel drove crude oil prices up over 4% amid concerns that the conflict could widen and jeopardize Middle East oil supplies. The US has sent a group of warships to the eastern Mediterranean. The Wall Street Journal reports that Iranian intelligence services helped Hamas plan Saturday’s surprise attack, raising the risk of retaliation against Iran.

Asian markets were mostly down yesterday. Japan’s Nikkei 225 (JP225) was not trading yesterday, China’s FTSE China A50 (CHA50) decreased by 0.69%, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng (HK50) added 0.18%, and Australia’s ASX 200 (AU200) ended the day positive by 0.23%.

Japan is unlikely to try to reverse the yen’s downtrend through currency intervention as the currency’s fall reflects real economic fundamentals, former chief currency diplomat Naoyuki Shinohara said yesterday. Shinohara said there are no set rules or general agreement among the G7 advanced economies on what currency movements are defined as “excessive volatility” that justifies intervention. The remarks contrast with the views of current chief foreign exchange diplomat Masato Kanda, who said last week that a sustained fall in the yen over a long period could be grounds for intervention.

S&P 500 (F)(US500) 4,335.66 +27.16 (+0.63%)

Dow Jones (US30) 33,604.65 +197.07 (+0.59%)

DAX (DE40)  15,128.11 −101.66 (−0.67%)

FTSE 100 (UK100) 7,492.21 −2.37 (−0.032%)

USD Index  106.09 +0.05 (+0.04%)

News feed for 2023.10.10:
  • – Australia NAB Business Confidence (m/m) at 03:30 (GMT+3);
  • – Norway Consumer Price Index (m/m) at 09:00 (GMT+3);
  • – UK FPC Meeting Minutes at 12:30 (GMT+3);
  • – US FOMC Member Bostic Speaks at 16:30 (GMT+3);
  • – US FOMC Member Kashkari Speaks at 22:00 (GMT+3).

By JustMarkets

 

This article reflects a personal opinion and should not be interpreted as an investment advice, and/or offer, and/or a persistent request for carrying out financial transactions, and/or a guarantee, and/or a forecast of future events.

Israel-Hamas war spooks markets as investors urged to avoid knee-jerk

By George Prior

Oil prices surged by 5% following Hamas’ unexpected attack on Israel over the weekend, but investors need to avoid knee-jerk reactions, warns the CEO of one of the world’s largest independent financial advisory, asset management and fintech organizations.

The warning from Nigel Green of deVere Group comes as global investors digest the news that the Palestinian Islamist group Hamas on Saturday launched the largest military assault on Israel in decades, killing hundreds of Israelis and triggering a wave of retaliatory Israeli air strikes on the Gaza Strip.

Heading into the third day, the death toll was 1,100, while the US said it was sending warships to the region.

The deVere CEO says: “The events in this region are now directly impacting financial markets worldwide, which, as ever in times of increased volatility, is immediately prompting some investors into selling off riskier parts of their portfolios, such as stocks and some currencies.

“Oil has a disproportionate impact on global financial markets due to its pivotal role in the world economy, its interconnectedness with various sectors, and its potential to influence broader economic conditions and investor sentiment.

“I would urge investors to avoid knee-jerk reactions to the oil price surge and geopolitical tensions that are creating the market turbulence.

“Investors are likely to profit by sitting still and not selling and then having to buy back at higher prices.”

He continues: “Indeed, savvy investors, including the likes of Warren Buffett, will likely use the volatility and lower entry points to top-up their portfolios for the long-term with high quality stocks that have robust fundamentals.”

Ensure your investment portfolio is diversified across various asset classes, such as stocks, bonds, and commodities. “Diversification is your best weapon to mitigate the risks associated with geopolitical events,” observes Nigel Green.

He also recommends that you keep a close eye on energy-related stocks and companies, as they are likely to be directly impacted by the fluctuating oil prices. Companies involved in oil production and exploration may benefit from higher prices, while industries that rely heavily on energy consumption may face challenges.

“While short-term market fluctuations can be unsettling, it’s essential to maintain a long-term perspective when making investment decisions. Historically, markets have rebounded from geopolitical crises, and a well-constructed portfolio can weather such storms,” he concludes.

About:

deVere Group is one of the world’s largest independent advisors of specialist global financial solutions to international, local mass affluent, and high-net-worth clients.  It has a network of offices across the world, over 80,000 clients and $12bn under advisement.

Geopolitical risk returns with renewed vigor

By JustMarkets

As of Friday’s stock market close, the Dow Jones Index (US30) increased by 0.87% (week-to-date -0.14%), while the S&P 500 Index (US500) added 1.18% (week-to-date +0.56%). The NASDAQ Technology Index (US100) closed positive 1.60% (week-to-date +1.61%) on Friday. Stock indexes rose sharply on Friday despite a strong Nonfarm Payrolls report. Stocks retreated initially Friday morning, with the Dow Jones Industrials Index falling to a 4-month low after bond yields jumped on the back of a 336,000 increase in US employment numbers. Additionally, August employment data was revised upward by 40,000 to 227,000 from the originally announced 187,000. The unemployment rate for September was unchanged at 3.8%. But a short time later, stocks returned to the upside amid a falling dollar. The US consumer credit for August unexpectedly contracted by $15.62 billion, the largest decline in 3 years and weaker than expectations for a $11.70 billion increase.

Canada’s labor market beat expectations for the third consecutive month, and wage growth accelerated. The country added 63,800 jobs in September, and the unemployment rate was 5.5%, where it has been since July. The data beat expectations for a modest gain of 20,000 jobs and an unemployment rate of 5.6%. Workers’ compensation growth rose to 5.3%, also beating expectations of 5.1% and up from 5.2% a month earlier. This is the third consecutive month of accelerating growth. The data suggests that even in the face of rising interest rates, the economy continues to expand jobs and wage growth strongly. Overnight swap traders raised bets on further policy tightening by the Bank of Canada, with another 25 basis point rate hike expected by March 2024.

Equity markets in Europe were mostly up on Friday. The German DAX (DE40) rose by 1.06% (-1.36% for the week), the French CAC 40 (FR40) gained 0.88% (-1.45% for the week), the Spanish IBEX 35 (ES35) added 0.78% (-2.31% for the week), the British FTSE 100 (UK100) closed up by 0.58% (-1.49% for the week).

ECB Executive Board spokesperson Schnabel said on Friday, “I still see upside risks to inflation, and if they materialize, further interest rate hikes may be necessary.” European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde said in an interview published Sunday that she was confident the ECB would meet its inflation target of 2% and was relatively confident about Europe’s gas reserves situation.

On Saturday, militants from the Palestinian group Hamas launched an unprecedented attack on Israel. The number of Israelis killed since the attack began totaled more than 700, and another 750 were reported missing. In response, Israel imposed a state of war for the first time since 1973. The country’s leadership enacted a special clause, “40 alef,” which means a formal declaration of war and that the army is given full freedom of action. The Hamas attack was openly welcomed by Iran and the Lebanese group Hezbollah, an ally of Iran. Western countries, led by the US, condemned the attack and declared their support for Israel. The aftermath of the outbreak of the war between Israel and Hamas was reflected in the stock markets of Middle Eastern countries on Sunday. Israel’s TA-35 stock index, calculated in Tel Aviv, ended the session down about 7%, mainly due to a drop in bank stocks. It was the sharpest market decline in three years. Analysts say the impact on the Gulf and Middle East markets depends on whether the conflict spreads. If so, it will increase uncertainty in the markets, inflation, and economic growth will take a back seat to geopolitical risk. Analysts say rising geopolitical risk could lead to the buying of assets such as gold and the US dollar and potentially boost demand for US Treasuries. The dollar, considered a safe haven in tough times, rose against the euro and pound sterling in early trading. Gold also showed the gap up.

Over the past week, Brent Crude fell about 11%, and WTI crude fell more than 8% amid concerns that continued high interest rates will lead to a slowdown in global economic growth, which in turn will affect fuel demand. On Sunday, Bahrain, Iraq, Kuwait, Oman, Oman, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates reaffirmed their commitment to “collective and individual voluntary adjustments” in oil production levels. In other words, OPEC+ countries may resort to further supply cuts if oil prices continue to decline.

Asian markets were mostly down last week. Japan’s Nikkei 225 (JP225) fell by 3.45% for the week, China’s FTSE China A50 (CHA50) did not trade all week due to holidays, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng (HK50) ended the week up by 0.01%, and Australia’s ASX 200 (AU200) ended the week negative by 1.34%.

US-listed Chinese stocks rose on Friday after it was reported that spending on Chinese internet platforms during the Golden Week holiday exceeded pre-pandemic levels. As a result, shares of PDD Holdings (PDD) rose more than 7% and led the Nasdaq 100 stock price gains. JD.com (JD) and Baidu (BIDU) also rose more than 3%. In addition, shares of Alibaba Group Holding (BABA) rose more than 2%.

S&P 500 (F)(US500) 4,308.50 +50.31 (+1.18%)

Dow Jones (US30) 33,407.58 +288.01 (+0.87%)

DAX (DE40)  15,229.77 +159.55 (+1.06%)

FTSE 100 (UK100) 7,494.58 +43.04 (+0.58%)

USD Index  106.10 −0.23 (−0.22%)

News feed for 2023.10.09:
  • – German Industrial Production (m/m) at 09:00 (GMT+3).

By JustMarkets

 

This article reflects a personal opinion and should not be interpreted as an investment advice, and/or offer, and/or a persistent request for carrying out financial transactions, and/or a guarantee, and/or a forecast of future events.

Markets are expecting a strong Nonfarm Payrolls report. Natural gas prices jumped to an 8-month high

By JustMarkets

At yesterday’s stock market close, the Dow Jones Index (US30) decreased by 0.03%, while the S&P 500 Index (US500) lost 0.13%. The NASDAQ Technology Index (US100) closed negative 0.12% on Thursday. Weekly jobless claims rose less than expected, a sign of a strengthening labor market that is hawkish for Fed policy.

The US weekly initial jobless claims rose by 2,000 to 207,000, a sign of a resilient labor market versus expectations of 210,000.

Today, market attention will focus on the monthly US Nonfarm Payrolls employment report, which is expected to show a 170,000 increase and a 0.1 decline in the September unemployment rate to 3.7%. A stronger-than-expected reading would indicate a strong and resilient labor market. In turn, this would emphasize the Fed’s stance of “holding rates longer,” and this would directly pressure risk assets such as the euro, pound, stock indices, and even gold. But any hints of a slowing labor market or any unexpected jumps in unemployment will be seen as a negative interest rate impact by the economy, which will weaken the dollar, lower government bond yields, and put confidence back into risk assets, gold, and indices.

Markets are currently pricing in a 22% probability that the FOMC will raise rates by 25 bps at its next meeting on November 1 and a 35% probability that the rate will be raised by 25 bps at its December 13 meeting.

The Canadian dollar rose in September despite the overall strengthening of the US dollar. Given that the Bank of Canada (BoC) left the rate unchanged in early September and expressed concerns about the sustainability of core inflation, it is clear that the Bank of Canada has a desire to keep the possibility of an additional rate hike alive.

Equity markets in Europe traded flat on Thursday. Germany’s DAX (DE40) fell by 0.20%, France’s CAC 40 (FR40) closed around the opening price, Spain’s IBEX 35 (ES35) added 0.67%, and the UK’s FTSE 100 (UK100) closed positive by 0.53%. ECB Vice President de Guindos said yesterday that with inflation still high, it is “premature” to discuss the possibility of cutting interest rates. Economists regard this stance by the ECB as hawkish. German exports fell by 1.2% m/m in August, worse than forecasts of 0.6% m/m. Imports in August also unexpectedly fell by 0.4% m/m vs. expectations of 0.5% m/m growth. Germany’s construction PMI for September fell by 2.2 to 39.3, the sharpest decline since the data series began in 2020. The economic outlook for the Eurozone’s largest economy remains sluggish.

Oil and gasoline prices continued to fall on Thursday, with oil falling to a 5-week low and gasoline falling to a 9-month low. Oil prices have been falling on concerns that slowing global growth will reduce energy demand and consumption. But a weaker dollar on Thursday limited the decline in energy prices. Tension in the oil market is expected to continue as the OPEC+ agreement to cut production is extended. Saudi Arabia recently said it will maintain its unilateral 1.0 million BPD oil production cut through December. The move will keep Saudi oil production at around 9 million BPD, the lowest in three years.

Natural gas prices jumped to an 8-month high on Thursday amid a smaller-than-expected rise in weekly natural gas inventories at the EIA. EIA natural gas inventories rose by 86 Bcf, below expectations of 94 Bcf. The natural gas market is also supported by forecasts that cooler temperatures in the US will increase demand for gas for heating. As of October 2, European natural gas storage inventories were 96% full, above the 5-year seasonal average of 88% for this time of year. The US natural gas inventories as of September 29 were 5.3% above the 5-year seasonal average.

Asian markets were mostly down yesterday. Japan’s Nikkei 225 (JP225) increased by 1.80% on Thursday, China’s FTSE China A50 (CHA50) will not trade for the rest of the week due to holidays, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng (HK50) added 0.10%, and Australia’s ASX200 (AU200) was positive by 0.51%.

S&P 500 (F)(US500) 4,258.19 −5.56 (−0.13%)

Dow Jones (US30) 33,119.57 −9.98 (−0.030%)

DAX (DE40)  15,070.22 −29.70 (−0.20%)

FTSE 100 (UK100) 7,451.54 +39.09 (+0.53%)

USD Index  106.35 −0.45 (−0.42%)

News feed for 2023.10.03:
  • – Australia Retail Sales (m/m) at 03:30 (GMT+3);
  • – Switzerland Unemployment Rate (m/m) at 08:45 (GMT+3);
  • – US Nonfarm Payrolls (m/m) at 15:30 (GMT+3);
  • – US Unemployment Rate (m/m) at 15:30 (GMT+3);
  • – Canada Unemployment Rate (m/m) at 15:30 (GMT+3);
  • – US FOMC Member Waller Speaks (m/m) at 19:00 (GMT+3).

By JustMarkets

 

This article reflects a personal opinion and should not be interpreted as an investment advice, and/or offer, and/or a persistent request for carrying out financial transactions, and/or a guarantee, and/or a forecast of future events.

Interest rates: Monetary policy is always political as central banks opt to back the financial sector

By Dan Cohen, Queen’s University, Ontario; Emily Rosenman, Penn State, and Martine August, University of Waterloo

As the Bank of Canada prepared to announce its decision on interest rates in early September, Tiff Macklem, the bank’s governor, received imploring letters from premiers spanning both the country and the political spectrum.

New Democrat David Eby of British Columbia wrote to the Bank of Canada, followed by Ontario’s Doug Ford, a Conservative, and by Liberal Andrew Furey of Newfoundland and Labrador.

In their letters, the premiers urged the bank against raising rates again and to think of the “human impact of rate increases” on Canadians already burdened by rising mortgage payments and financial pain.

When Macklem announced he was holding the rate at five per cent, Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland called the decision “a welcome relief for Canadians.”

Facing subsequent accusations from economists and journalists that she was meddling, Freeland made clear a few hours later that she respected the independence of the Bank of Canada.

Social impact of monetary policy

But the criticism raises important questions. Is monetary policy really outside the realm of politics? What are the social ramifications of our current monetary policy system?

The view that central banks should be independent of politics has shifted many times over the history of central banks.

While central bank decision-making is independent from government, the banks follow mandates set by governments. These mandates vary in different countries.

The United States Federal Reserve (the Fed), for example, has a dual mandate: to manage inflation and pursue maximum stable employment. The Bank of Canada’s mandate, by contrast, is focused entirely on managing inflation, with an arbitrary target of two per cent.

In theory, central banks pursue these goals without interference from government.

But we don’t believe political debates over monetary policy should be off limits.

Ties between politics and monetary policy

In the 1970s, Fed chairman Paul Volcker famously used monetary policy — specifically a campaign of rapid interest rate increases — to erode the bargaining power of labour as a means of taming inflation.

That decision had wide-ranging effects — including a reduction in union membership — that continue to have an impact on American society and placed the burden of fighting inflation onto the working class.

This logic continues, crudely captured in a recent viral video when Australian real estate developer Tim Gurner argued:

“We need to see unemployment rise, we need to see pain in the economy … to remind people that they work for the employer, not the other way around.”

In more polite language, Phillip Lowe, outgoing governor of Australia’s central bank, recently acknowledged that the effects of monetary policy are “felt unevenly across the community.”

The scene in Canada

According to our research, monetary policy likewise has an impact on wealth inequality in Canada by supporting the financial sector over other parts of the economy.

Indeed, the overt goal of monetary policy is to stabilize the financial system, a priority that disproportionately benefits those in the financial sector.

This has become clear in recent decades, beginning with the 2008 global financial crisis and continuing to the COVID-19 pandemic, when central banks around the world began to use “quantitative easing” to stimulate the economy.

While monetary policy had previously centred on setting the rates at which regulated banks could borrow, central banks expanded their role by undertaking massive asset purchasing campaigns via quantitative easing.

Central banks began supporting not just regulated banks but investment funds, hedge funds and other “non-bank financial intermediaries” — also known as shadow banks — that are largely unregulated.

This involved tactics like purchasing corporate bonds to stabilize the corporate debt market.

Investors benefit

These new Bank of Canada policies grant “infrastructural power” over how monetary policy is implemented to the financial sector, buttressing the profits of investors with public dollars. This allows investors to determine how the capital provided by the bank will be invested — with little regulation or public oversight.

Acknowledging this shift, Bank of Canada deputy governor Toni Gravelle said the bank has moved from its traditional role as “lender of last resort” to “liquidity provider of last resort,” promising to “resolve market-wide stresses when the financial system cannot find its footing.”

When the working class cannot “find its footing,” however, the Bank of Canada doesn’t extend a helping hand. In 2022, for example, Macklem told employers not to increase wages despite rampant inflation, and told unionized workers not to ask for a raise.

The central bank’s decision to support the financial sector is, in fact, political. It benefits some — financial sector executives and investors — at the expense of others, and tilts economic decision-making in their favour.

When a public institution buys hundreds of billions in assets as the Bank of Canada did in March 2020, Canadians are right to ask questions about its impact, and politicians should respond.

Enriching the already rich

The premiers’ letters to the Bank of Canada, while described as unprecedented, expose how monetary policy involves fundamentally political questions about the distribution of wealth in our society.

As we demonstrated in our research, the Bank of Canada’s quantitative easing tactics during the pandemic had a vastly uneven impact, driving up house prices and enriching already wealthier homeowners, while lower-income households and renters faced higher rents and precarity.

It also helped investors who took advantage of cheap capital and rising asset values to scoop up multi-family apartments and houses in Canada.

The impact doesn’t stop at housing. As inflation rose, central banks hiked interest rates, assuming that would boost unemployment, reduce labour costs and slow the economy so that inflation would fall.

But at a time when the causes of inflation are highly contested (there are ongoing debates around supply chain disruptions and “sellers inflation,” for example) choosing to focus on wages is political.

What should central banks do?

Where does this leave us in terms of the politics of monetary policy and central bank independence?

While central bank decisions may need to be independent of government influence, the factors banks consider are determined by our political systems.

Central banks could consider factors that benefit workers and people who don’t own assets — from maximizing employment to promoting housing affordability and addressing climate change risks.

European Central Bank president Christine Lagarde, for example, has said climate change should factor into central bank decision-making.

Others argue monetary policy can be used to fund the green transition, building on the European Central Bank’s practice of using targeted loans to influence the financial sector rather than leaving decision-making in the hands of financial institutions.

Given the connection between monetary policy and inequality, it’s time for a serious debate on why central banks use public institutions to support private finance — and what they should be doing differently.


The authors would like to acknowledge and thank research assistant Yun Liu for her work on this article.The Conversation

Dan Cohen, Assistant Professor, Queen’s University, Ontario; Emily Rosenman, Assistant Professor of Geography, Penn State, and Martine August, Associate Professor, School of Planning, University of Waterloo

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Weak ADP employment data supported stock indices. Australia has seen an increase in exports

By JustMarkets

At yesterday’s stock market close, the Dow Jones Index (US30) increased by 0.39%, while the S&P 500 Index (US500) added 0.81%. The NASDAQ Technology Index (US100) closed positive by 1.35% on Wednesday. Stocks closed modestly higher on Wednesday as lower bond yields temporarily eased interest rate concerns and supported gains in equities. Bond yields fell after the monthly ADP employment report showed fewer jobs than expected, a dovish factor for Fed policy.

The ADP US employment change for September came in at an 89,000 increase, weaker than expectations of 150,000 and the lowest increase in 2.5 years. The ISM Services Business Activity Index for September fell from 0.9 to 53.6, stronger than expectations of 53.5. Factory orders in the US for August rose by 1.2% m/m, stronger than expectations of 0.3% m/m.

Alphabet (GOOGL) closed higher by more than 2% after introducing the new Pixel 8 and Pixel 8 pro phones, as well as the new Pixel Watch. The company also said it will release a version of its Bard artificial intelligence-powered virtual assistant. Palantir Technologies (PLTR) closed higher by more than 5% as the company emerged as the top bidder for a contract to modernize the UK’s National Health Service.

Equity markets in Europe were mostly down on Tuesday. Germany’s DAX (DE40) added 0.10%, France’s CAC 40 (FR 40) closed at its opening price, Spain’s IBEX 35 (ES35) fell by 0.58%, and the UK’s FTSE 100 (UK100) closed down by 0.77%. Eurozone retail sales fell by 1.2% m/m in August, weaker than expectations of 0.5% m/m and the largest decline in 8 months. The eurozone goods and services price index came in at a record drop of 11.5% y/y in August after 7.6% y/y in July, which was in line with expectations.

ECB President Lagarde said yesterday that future ECB decisions “will ensure that interest rates are set at sufficiently restrictive levels for as long as necessary.” Investors viewed this ECB stance as hawkish.

On Wednesday, Saudi Arabia and Russia announced they would maintain their oil production cuts through the end of the year. But oil prices fell by nearly 6%, marking the biggest one-day sell-off since September 2022. The collapse in oil prices on Wednesday came amid several factors. Chief among them was concern about the state of the global economy, especially the most vulnerable Europe versus the relatively robust US economy. Another driving force behind Wednesday’s drop in oil prices was the seasonal slowdown in US demand, a fact that seems to have been missed by those betting that the last quarter’s oil rally would continue indefinitely.

Asian markets were mostly down yesterday. Japan’s Nikkei 225 (JP225) decreased by 2.28% on Wednesday, China’s FTSE China A50 (CHA50) will not trade for the rest of the week due to holidays, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng (HK50) fell by 0.78%, and Australia’s ASX200 (AU200) was negative 0.77%.

The Australian Bureau of Statistics released the trade balance data for August, which showed a significant increase in Australian exports (+4% for the month while -2% was expected), which may provide temporary support to the Australian dollar (AUD). Why temporary? Because the AUD is being dovishly supported by the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA).

S&P 500 (F)(US500) 4,263.75 +34.30 (+0.81%)

Dow Jones (US30) 33,129.55 +127.17 (+0.39%)

DAX (DE40)  15,099.92 +14.71 (+0.10%)

FTSE 100 (UK100) 7,412.45 −57.71 (−0.77%)

USD Index  106.78 −0.21 (−0.20%)

News feed for 2023.10.03:
  • – Australia Trade Balance (m/m) at 03:30 (GMT+3);
  • – German Trade Balance (m/m) at 09:00 (GMT+3);
  • – UK Construction PMI (m/m) at 11:30 (GMT+3);
  • – Canada Trade Balance (m/m) at 15:30 (GMT+3);
  • – US Trade Balance (m/m) at 15:30 (GMT+3);
  • – US Initial Jobless Claims (w/w) at 15:30 (GMT+3);
  • – Canada Ivey PMI (m/m) at 17:00 (GMT+3);
  • – US Natural Gas Storage (w/w) at 17:30 (GMT+3);
  • – US FOMC Member Daly Speaks (m/m) at 18:30 (GMT+3);
  • – US FOMC Member Barr Speaks (m/m) at 19:15 (GMT+3).

By JustMarkets

 

This article reflects a personal opinion and should not be interpreted as an investment advice, and/or offer, and/or a persistent request for carrying out financial transactions, and/or a guarantee, and/or a forecast of future events.

How To Invest Through the Next Crisis

Source: Michael Ballanger  (10/2/23) 

Michael Ballanger of GGM Advisory Inc. shares his experience surviving three major crashes and one mini crash to tell you how he survived. He also shares stocks he believes are worth looking into and explains why he believes you should invest in copper. 

As I pore through dozens of “Daily Market Commentaries” offered each morning by the major banks and brokerages around North America and Europe, there is one old horse chestnut that will never disappear: “Fear sells.”

The Three Major

One thing that has not yet failed in my septuagenarian memory center is my recollection of the three major and one mini-market crashes through which I survived amidst fear and loathing early in my career and greed and excitement later in my career. The reason for this metamorphosis is the financial scar tissue that was developed in the early years served to guide me in later years, acting as a psychological sedative during times of market unrest.

Back in October 1987, watching a $500,000 portfolio (carrying $250,000 of margin debt) go to a $16,000 equity value, thanks in large to the merciless pen of my firm’s margin clerk, it was a valuable lesson for a young man trying to succeed in the wild world of investing “other people’s money” (know unaffectionately as “OTM”) while managing the far more important (tongue-in-cheek) personal account (affectionately known as “my P.A.”). I recall the perverse levels of glee exhibited by brokerage house managers across the system at the extraordinary commissions being generated by the forced sellouts of under-margined accounts, thinking: “These people are never coming back. . .” and ruing the day that turned out to be true.

In response to the 22.6%, one-day plunge in the Dow Jones, Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan introduced the first emergency measure of the modern era by opening up the liquidity spigots, sending long-term bond yields plunging while injecting tens of billions into the financial system to shore up the banks and brokers. One year later, stocks hit new highs, thus setting the template for stock market bailouts for decades (although it took years to sink in for most investors).

By the time we got to 2007, we had survived all kinds of mini-corrections, including fears of massive computer malfunctions at the turn of the New Millennium and the 9/11 tragedy, so by 2008, I was enjoying the “China buys EVERYTHING” commodity boom and was completely oblivious to the mortgage fraud being perpetrated everywhere (setting a template for repeats in Canada, China, Australia, and New Zealand fifteen years later).

The next major one was eleven years later when a number of men then considered “the smartest in the room” decided to set up a highly-leveraged investment fund of systemic size (and potential impact) and named it Long Term Capital Management which was a misnomer as it was run by a gaggle of trigger-fingered ex-bond-traders whose idea of a “long-term trade” was the amount of time it took for the ink to dry on the confirmations slips.

Despite the PHD and MBA shingles hanging ceremoniously from every wall, their high-browed strategy assumed that markets would remain rational forever, and when the Rooskies decided to tell bondholders to pound sand in the summer of 1998, the ensuing liquidity crisis set off a domino effect of cash calls and down went LTCM with a crash that forced the banks (all except Lehman Bros.) to bail them out but not before stocks had suffered a 22% crash over the next sixty days. The career-risk panic by the end of September 1998 was palpable, with notable oxymorons of the day being “wealthy client” and “responsible broker.”

Once again, the Fed/Wall St. bailout team came to the rescue, and stocks recovered all losses by year-end, once again installing a Pavlovian imprint into the risk management psyches of the investing public.

By the time we got to 2007, we had survived all kinds of mini-corrections, including fears of massive computer malfunctions at the turn of the New Millennium and the 9/11 tragedy, so by 2008, I was enjoying the “China buys EVERYTHING” commodity boom and was completely oblivious to the mortgage fraud being perpetrated everywhere (setting a template for repeats in Canada, China, Australia, and New Zealand fifteen years later).

Arriving like a thief in the night, the third crash was in 2008 and was a classic example of a self-inflicted shotgun blast to the sternum of the financial system, the gun armed and aimed by the banking sector aided and abetted by both the rating agencies and the mortgage industry.

As long as the music kept playing,”  they said,  “they had to keep dancing,”  but what the public failed to grasp was that the bankers knew that if and when the music stopped, Congress and the Fed would provide an unlimited number of high-backed and very plush chairs for the bankers but cold, hard concrete for the masses.

Alas, as if scripted by a Hollywood team, stocks caught a foothold in March 2009 and screamed to all-time highs four years later, propelled by a veritable gusher of liquidity (DEBT) conjured up by the central bankers and their political henchmen.

The House of Fear

The rest of the decade of 2010-2020 was a pleasure ride of the highest order. It was a goldilocks dreamworld of low inflation and low borrowing costs, largely the result of the gutting of the Western labor unions and the expatriation of the American middle class. China and Latin America now had all of the manufacturing businesses that once employed the average American breadwinner, but this wonderful era of “globalization” was really a ploy to enrich and empower the banking sector because as long as managers of assembly plants in Beijing or Hermosillo did not need worry about picket lines, their profit margins were sacrosanct and bottom lines and top lines could be exceeded while stock option plans were making them richer than they had ever imagined.

That all stopped when a wayward, disease-infected bat worked his way out of a laboratory in Wuhan, China, and ended up on a dinner plate in the local “wet market.” Sensing an opportunity to seize votes, politicians the world over donned phony Dollar Store masks and stood arm-in-arm in front of the cameras, ordering common citizens to stay indoors, distance themselves from others, stay home from school, and not visit their ailing parents.

To rub salt in the wounds, they then ordered those citizens to get jabbed with a substance that failed to meet even the laxest of testing standards for new medicines. They fired people for refusing “medical treatment” where the right to refuse such is actually a law. The final straw was when these “science-following” fools shut down the global economy and then papered over the error by dropping trillions of dollars out of helicopters into the laps of all shut-in, masked, vaccinated, and unemployed citizens, failing to understand that everything they would be buying through Amazon would be in short supply because nobody was manufacturing it.

The abject stupidity of it was hard to fathom, but since the politicians were and are always right, they made sure that interest rates stayed “zero-bound,” all the while these trillions of dollars were desperately seeking out goods and services that were about to get a lot more expensive. Only after a 35% crash in March of 2020 did the Fed wake up along with Washington (and Ottawa and London and Paris, etc., etc. etc.) and begin to open up the floodgates of “emergency stimulus.”

This stimulus continued even after stocks had recovered all of their COVID crash losses until late in 2021 when inflation data confirmed that it was not exactly “transitory” as pronounced by Fed Chairman (and ex-stock salesman) Jerome Powell, but in fact was “sticky.”

Remember that since “Fear Sells,”  the specter of the explosion of the debt bomb is what the newsletters use to sell subscriptions. It is also what prompts customers to move assets from the conservative bond house to the “House of Fear,” where gold guns and cabins in the mountains are the topics of the “Daily Market Commentaries.” Somewhere in the middle is the desired destination for the rational investor.

Since stocks topped in January 2022, they have had a begrudging correction that has at its core total ambivalence over serious structural problems in the global supply chain and an unsurmountable amount of sovereign debt that today threatens to choke the life out of the bull market in everything including housing, stocks, and congressional bribery.

The only reason that stocks are sitting today within an earshot of all-time highs is that the gargantuan flow of money into stocks each and every month is being executed by those who only know the “bailout” kind of market environment.

In 1987, there was no such precedent for a stock market rescue because that would be a violation of the All-American philosophy of “free market capitalism” spouted out by the Larry Kudlow’s and Jim Cramer’s of the world until, of course, their portfolios have seen a 40% drawdown and a margin call threatened a total wipeout.

“They know nothing!” shouted Cramer back in 2008, thinking that we all thought he meant the central bankers. What he really meant was that what they did not know was how much money he had lost buying Bear Sterns at $50 days before it got a rescue bid at $10 by the Almighty and Powerful Jamie Dimon and J.P. Morgan. The world of “socialized losses” and “privatized profits” is alive and well in 2023, but I would hazard a guess that the one thing standing in its way is that the debt bomb has a soon-to-be lit fuse that is now out of reach of the water hoses of the central banks and politicians. They doused that fuse during every crash since 1987 and hid it behind a mountain of liquidity, but as the mountain begins to melt away under the heat of economic stagflation, the fuse is once again both dry and exposed with the combination of de-globalization and elevated inflation and interest rates representing a “clear-and-present blowtorch” to the unsuspecting fuse.

Debt liquidation is not an inflationary happenstance; it is the ultimate deflation. Imagine prices for goods and services around the world going “NO BID” in a total absence of liquidity (credit), which is the lifeblood of all commerce here in 2023. It was not that way fifty years ago. Economies prospered or went bus bust upon adherence to (or lack thereof) sound money principles and the Christian Work Ethic (“Western” Work Ethic” being more politically correct). It is not my wish that the debt bomb explodes, but it is certainly my greatest living fear, both as an investor and as a citizen. A debt explosion vaporizes the purchasing power of all domestic currencies that rely upon credit, with the only survivors being those who have stores of value in their operational incomes, like farming, medicine, and most of the basic trades. One can barter to treat an ailment or mend fencing or repair tractors, but the last thing “of value” is financial services and especially “advice.”

Remember that since “Fear Sells,”  the specter of the explosion of the debt bomb is what the newsletters use to sell subscriptions. It is also what prompts customers to move assets from the conservative bond house to the “House of Fear,” where gold guns and cabins in the mountains are the topics of the “Daily Market Commentaries.”

Somewhere in the middle is the desired destination for the rational investor.

Stocks

I have been a bear on stocks since the top in early August when the S&P 500 registered a bearish MACD crossover and started the first leg down in this corrective move — and that is just what it is — a corrective move. It is not the start of a market crash a secular bear market, or even a full-blown correction, although the NASDAQ is currently in that category.

I am now a cautious-about-to-turn-aggressive bull looking out to mid-October for a major rally that could quite possibly take stocks to all-time highs above SPX 4,818 by New Year’s. In this morning’s pre-opening email alert, I typed:  This morning, I am anticipating a mid-session pullback as the last of the institutional window dressing is completed. Then, look for a rally to $445.00 on the SPDR Gold Shares ETF (GLD:NYSE) to commence.”

The reason for this is that sudden crashes in stock prices do not appear when “others are fearful,” and right now, the big traders are just that — fearful.

Compared to July when artificial intelligence ruled the roost and traders were making bets on a “Fed Pivot by Labour Day,” they have now dismissed AI in favor of “higher for longer” and the abject certainty that “something will break” in October, triggering a crash.

Stocks are on the defensive as margin calls on everything but your pet chihuahua are being met with month-end selling but my money, FWIW, is on a face-ripping rally to commence in October leaving the bears cowering in fetal positions in their dens.

All of the major indicators are either in or are quickly approaching oversold status and while the monthly numbers look a tad scary, the GLD:NYSE could easily rally back to $445.00 at which point I will re-assess.

Conditions favoring a year-end rally are rounding into shape from perspectives of both technical and sentimental set-ups.

Gold and Silver

I have been flat gold and silver trading positions since early September for no other reason than they “just weren’t acting right,” and while that could be true for the past three years since the Fed and Treasury opened up the monetary fire hoses, during the summer pullback in the U.S, dollar (USD) neither metal could mount any kind of momentum.

Once the USD bottomed in late August, it began a meteoric ascent driven by rising U.S. bond yields that is still ongoing despite rising energy prices and slowing (ex-food and energy) CPI numbers.

With the USD now firmly in overbought territory (RSI 70.95) and the GLD:NYSE in oversold territory (RSI 25), conditions are ripe for a turn, and with the Gold Miners Bullish Percent Index at 10.71, sentiment for the gold and silver stocks is putrid.

Norseman Silver Ltd. (NOC:TSX.V; NOCSF:OTCQB)CQB)

In fact, colleagues of mine have been asking me what I think of the current state of the Canadian junior resource market, and my only response is “What market?” because outside of selected uranium and lithium stocks (and lithium came under huge pressure in September), there is little demand and relative to the junior gold and silver markets, there is patently NO demand, whatsoever.

If one is a contrarian, one has to be backing up the truck as one accumulates some very promising juniors like Norseman Silver Ltd. (NOC:TSX.V; NOCSF:OTCQB) whose seasoned and very competent management team is scouring the planet for an advanced project within the “Electrification Trilogy” of uranium, copper, and lithium.

I should add (very quietly) that NOC/NOCSF closed at the ridiculous price of CA$0.035 today, which is less than the cost of buying a Vancouver shell.

I confess to having exhibited strong masochistic tendencies since 2020 in the full and unwavering belief that a junior resource bull “to end all bulls” is lurking just around the corner. While I have enjoyed marginal success in the uranium and lithium space, the copper space has been largely ignored and unloved throughout the entire post-pandemic monetary print-fest. Therein lies my next serious hunt, as there can be no successful transition to electric vehicles unless there is a tenfold increase in the transmission grid, and critical to expanding that grid is copper.

Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. (IVN:TSX; IVPAF:OTCQX)

It was weak in September, falling over 7.3% before a modest bounce into month-end. Since the big money has found electrical storage in lithium and since they have more recently gone after clean energy in uranium, they have yet to anoint energy transmission and copper as the last member of that very special trilogy. As a warning, I will continue to beat the copper drum until Bob Friedland forces me to buy shares in his behemoth Ivanhoe Mines Ltd., the crown jewel of the Friedland Empire.

As a casual observer of the deal since 2005, I have watched the genius that is Robert Friedland over the years (after meeting him in 1993) amass a large fortune through mining, first leaving North America for Singapore, then managing Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. (IVN:TSX; IVPAF:OTCQX) through intricate deals in Mongolia and Africa with the result being the largest copper producer in the world at Kamoa-Kakula which is situated in the Democratic Republic of the Congo in partnership with the government and Chinmet, the Chinese National Mining Company.

Arguably the finest salesman on the planet, Friedland deserves every penny of accolade bestowed to him by the usually agnostic press, which seem to view him as the fast-and-furious penny stock promoter of the 1980s and 1990s (which he was), but every time I listen to him addressing the Saudi princes or the Chinese mandarins in conferences throughout the Middle East and Asia, I am reminded of the time in 2002 he addressed a bunch of salesmen with the former Yorkton Securities in Toronto shortly after the dotcom market had blown up.

He took off his Armani jacket and rolled up his $300 shirt sleeves, and scolded the demoralized and destitute brokers up one side and down the other with visceral derision for failing to understand that “Technology is effin’ DEAD, and you mutts will have no clients left if you do not get them OUT and into commodities!” His vitriol was beyond “frightening.”

Within six months, Friedland was bang on, and by 2003, the metals markets were screaming higher, and it lasted until 2011 as China was the top dog in the race, exactly as he had predicted during that meeting.

So, when I start spouting off and tripping the light fantastic over “old guys” that I totally admire, I try to look beyond their self-laudatory idiosyncrasies and focus on their accomplishments, many of which can be attributed to chaps like Bob Friedland.

The reasons that he likes copper are anchored in the reasons he has been successful. The reasons he has been successful are anchored in his understanding of the mining industry. The reasons he understands the mining industry are anchored in the failures that built up the scar tissue early in his career. With that scar tissue, he can withstand the slings and arrows that appear in the mirror every morning of his life in an industry filled with body bags. A remarkable talent at best. . .

Copper is a buy; Ivanhoe Mines is a buy. Bob Friedland is a buy. End of story.

 

 

Important Disclosures:

  1. Norseman Silver Ltd. is a billboard sponsor of Streetwise Reports and pays SWR a monthly sponsorship fee between US$4,000 and US$5,000.
  2. As of the date of this article, officers and/or employees of Streetwise Reports LLC (including members of their household) own securities of Norseman Silver Ltd.
  3. Michael Ballanger: I, or members of my immediate household or family, own securities of: All. I determined which companies would be included in this article based on my research and understanding of the sector.
  4. Statements and opinions expressed are the opinions of the author and not of Streetwise Reports or its officers. The author is wholly responsible for the validity of the statements. The author was not paid by Streetwise Reports for this article. Streetwise Reports was not paid by the author to publish or syndicate this article. Streetwise Reports requires contributing authors to disclose any shareholdings in, or economic relationships with, companies that they write about. Streetwise Reports relies upon the authors to accurately provide this information and Streetwise Reports has no means of verifying its accuracy.
  5.  This article does not constitute investment advice. Each reader is encouraged to consult with his or her individual financial professional. By opening this page, each reader accepts and agrees to Streetwise Reports’ terms of use and full legal disclaimer. This article is not a solicitation for investment. Streetwise Reports does not render general or specific investment advice and the information on Streetwise Reports should not be considered a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Streetwise Reports does not endorse or recommend the business, products, services or securities of any company.
  6.  This article does not constitute medical advice. Officers, employees and contributors to Streetwise Reports are not licensed medical professionals. Readers should always contact their healthcare professionals for medical advice.

For additional disclosures, please click here.

The yields of government bonds continue to update the maximums. RBNZ left the rate unchanged

By JustMarkets

At yesterday’s stock market close, the Dow Jones Index (US30) was down by 1.29%, while the S&P 500 Index (US500) decreased by 1.37%. The NASDAQ Technology Index (US100) closed negative by 1.87% on Tuesday. The S&P 500 (US500) and Dow Jones Industrials (US30) indices fell to 4-month lows as the dollar index and government bond yields surged to 16-year highs. Hawkish comments from Fed Chair Cleveland Mester and Atlanta Fed Chair Bostic pushed 10-year T-note yields to a 16-year high as they voiced their support for keeping interest rates higher. Economic data on the labor market also supported the dollar. The US job openings rose by 690,000 from the previous month to 9.61 million in August, well above the market’s consensus forecast of 8.80 million and indicating a robust labor market. Investors fear that the Fed will raise the rate once again this year (the probability is already over 40%).

JPMorgan Asset Management warned that there is a risk of further stock market declines due to rising interest rates, “We didn’t expect this rate hike. This is something that will at least slow or even reverse the progress of stock markets.” Airbnb (ABNB) stock prices fell more than 6% and topped the list of losers on the Nasdaq 100 index after KeyBanc Capital Markets downgraded the company’s stock to sector Perform from Outperform. Goldman Sachs (GS) was down more than 3% and topped the list of losers in the Dow Jones Industrials after Morgan Stanley cut its target price on the stock to $329 from $347.

Prospects for a reduction in global fuel supplies are lending support to oil. Late last month, Russia announced a ban on gasoline and diesel exports in an attempt to stabilize domestic fuel prices. The ban will reduce fuel supplies by about 1 million BPD, about 3.4% of total global demand. The OPEC+ country will meet today. No surprises are expected – the countries are forecast to continue their previously planned cuts.

Asian markets were mostly declining yesterday. Japan’s Nikkei 225 (JP225) decreased by 1.64% on Tuesday, China’s FTSE China A50 (CHA50) will not trade for the rest of the week due to holidays, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng (HK50) was down by 2.69% on Tuesday, and Australia’s ASX 200 (AU200) was negative 1.28%.

The Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ) left the interest rate unchanged at 5.5% and expressed a relatively soft stance on the future trajectory of the OCR in an accompanying statement. Key factors determining the likelihood and size of a November tightening will be third-quarter inflation data due on October 17 and labor market data on November 1.

Japan’s finance ministry conducted another currency intervention yesterday to support the exchange rate, although there was no official statement from officials. A spokesman for Japan’s finance ministry was not available to comment on whether Japan had intervened against the yen. But analysts pointed to other explanations, such as standing orders to sell dollars at the 150 level because of the threat of official action. Others speculate that there may have been a check by Japanese authorities on exchange rates at banks, a move often seen as a prelude to further official action.

S&P 500 (F)(US500) 4,229.45 −58.94 (−1.37%)

Dow Jones (US30) 33,002.38 −430.97 (−1.29%)

DAX (DE40)  15,085.21 −162.00 (−1.06%)

FTSE 100 (UK100) 7,470.16 −40.56 (−0.54%)

USD Index  107.06 +0.16 (+0.15%)

News feed for 2023.10.03:
  • – Japan Services PMI (m/m) at 03:30 (GMT+3);
  • – New Zealand Interest Rate Decision at 04:00 (GMT+3);
  • – New Zealand RBNZ Rate Statement at 04:00 (GMT+3);
  • – Eurozone Services PMI (m/m) at 11:00 (GMT+3);
  • – Eurozone ECB President Lagarde Speaks (m/m) at 11:15 (GMT+3);
  • – UK Services PMI (m/m) at 11:30 (GMT+3);
  • – Eurozone Producer Price Index (m/m) at 12:00 (GMT+3);
  • – Eurozone Retail Sales (m/m) at 12:00 (GMT+3);
  • – OPEC+ meeting at 13:00 (GMT+3);
  • – US ADP Nonfarm Employment Change (m/m) at 15:15 (GMT+3);
  • – US ISM Services PMI (m/m) at 17:00 (GMT+3);
  • – US FOMC Member Bowman Speaks (m/m) at 17:25 (GMT+3);
  • – US Crude Oil Reserves (w/w) at 17:30 (GMT+3);
  • – Eurozone ECB President Lagarde Speaks (m/m) at 19:00 (GMT+3).

By JustMarkets

 

This article reflects a personal opinion and should not be interpreted as an investment advice, and/or offer, and/or a persistent request for carrying out financial transactions, and/or a guarantee, and/or a forecast of future events.

OPEC+ plans to maintain production cuts. The RBA left the rate unchanged

By JustMarkets

At yesterday’s stock market close, the Dow Jones Index (US30) decreased by 0.22%, while the S&P 500 Index (US500) added 0.08%. The NASDAQ Technology Index (US100) closed positive by 0.57% on Monday. Rising T-note yields lent support to the dollar after the 10-year bond yield rose to a 16-year high of 4.701% on Monday. The US economic news released on Monday was mostly better than expected and was bullish for the dollar. The ISM manufacturing index for September rose by 1.4 to 49.0, beating expectations of 47.9. In addition, construction spending for August rose by 0.5% m/m, matching expectations.

Fed Chair Bowman’s hawkish comments on Monday were favorable for the dollar when she stated: “I continue to expect that further interest rate increases are likely to be needed to bring inflation back to the 2% level in a timely manner, as high energy prices could reverse some of the gains we have seen in recent months.” For today, markets are factoring in a 31% probability that the FOMC will raise the lending rate by 25 bps at its next meeting on November 1 and a 51% probability that the rate will be raised by 25 bps at the meeting that ends on December 13.

Goldman Sachs said on Monday that US large-cap tech stocks are likely to perform well in the third quarter after the recent sell-off led to lower valuations, and “the divergence between lower valuations and improving fundamentals represents an opportunity for investors.”

Equity markets in Europe were mostly down on Monday. Germany’s DAX (DE40) fell by 0.91%, France’s CAC 40 (FR40) lost 0.94% yesterday, Spain’s IBEX 35 (ES35) declined by 1.16%, and the UK’s FTSE 100 (UK100) closed down by 1.28%. On Monday, ECB Vice President Gindos said that keeping interest rates at current levels will help bring inflation down to the ECB’s 2% target and that talk of a rate cut by the ECB is premature. This is a negative for the European currency as the ECB is likely to end its tightening cycle.

The rally of the dollar index to a 10-month high on Monday had a negative impact on energy prices. The likelihood of further interest rate hikes could slow economic growth and energy demand. But comments from the United Arab Emirates energy minister on Monday lent support to oil prices as he favored maintaining OPEC+ oil production cuts, saying the alliance was pursuing the “right policy.” Tensions in the oil market are expected to continue as OPEC+ production cuts are extended. Saudi Arabia recently said it would maintain its unilateral oil production cut of 1.0 million BPD through December. The move will keep Saudi oil production at around 9 million BPD, the lowest in three years.

Asian markets were mostly down yesterday. Japan’s Nikkei 225 (JP225) decreased by 0.31% on Monday, China’s FTSE China A50 (CHA50) will not trade for the rest of the week due to holidays, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng (HK50) was not trading yesterday, and Australia’s ASX 200 (AU200) was negative 0.22%.

Yesterday morning, minutes from the Bank of Japan’s meeting were released, discussing the move out of negative interest rates. One board representative expressed risk management concerns about a major policy shift, as the BoJ may have enough data to make a decision on negative rates in the first quarter of next year. The prospect of a move away from negative interest rates has led to another rise in yields on 10-year Japanese government bonds, requiring the bank to make unplanned bond purchases. Japanese officials have been warning markets against currency speculation for weeks now, with the Japanese yen reaching last year’s levels when the BoJ intervened.

China’s manufacturing PMI for September rose by 0.5 to a 6-month high of 50.2, exceeding expectations of 50.1. In addition, China’s non-manufacturing PMI for September rose by 0.7 to 51.7, exceeding expectations of 51.6.

The Reserve Bank of Australia kept its interest rate unchanged at 4.1%. At the same time, the central bank reiterated its warning that further tightening might be needed to contain inflation within a “reasonable time frame.”

S&P 500 (F)(US500) 4,288.39 +0.34 (+0.08%)

Dow Jones (US30) 33,433.35 −74.15 (−0.22%)

DAX (DE40)  15,247.21 −139.37 (−0.91%)

FTSE 100 (UK100) 7,510.72 −97.36 (−1.28%)

USD Index  107.02 +0.80 (+0.75%)

News feed for 2023.10.03:
  • – US FOMC Member Mester Speaks (m/m) at 02:30 (GMT+3);
  • – Australia RBA Interest Rate Decision (m/m) at 06:30 (GMT+3);
  • – Australia RBA Rate Statement (m/m) at 06:30 (GMT+3);
  • – Switzerland Consumer Price Index (m/m) at 09:30 (GMT+3);
  • – US FOMC Member Bostic Speaks (m/m) at 15:00 (GMT+3);
  • – US JOLTs Job Openings (m/m) at 17:00 (GMT+3).

By JustMarkets

 

This article reflects a personal opinion and should not be interpreted as an investment advice, and/or offer, and/or a persistent request for carrying out financial transactions, and/or a guarantee, and/or a forecast of future events.