Archive for Economics & Fundamentals – Page 84

Extreme weather could burn many investment portfolios by mid-century

By Noël Amenc, EDHEC Business School; Abhishek Gupta, EDHEC Business School; Bertrand Jayles, EDHEC Business School; Darwin Marcelo, EDHEC Business School; Frédéric Blanc-Brude, EDHEC Business School; Leonard Lum, EDHEC Business School; Nishtha Manocha, EDHEC Business School, and Qinyu Goh, EDHEC Business School 

Climate change is one of the most pressing challenges facing humanity today, with potentially severe implications for infrastructure assets. Infrastructure investments such as roads, bridges, ports, airports, and power plants have long lifetimes, typically spanning several decades, and are designed to operate under specific climatic conditions. However, climate change is causing more frequent and intense extreme weather events, such as floods, droughts, heat waves, and storms, which can damage or disrupt infrastructure assets. These physical risks can lead to direct losses, increased maintenance costs, and lower asset values.

At the same time, climate change induces changes in policy, technology, and consumer preferences that can impact the value of infrastructure assets. This is known as transition risks. For example, new regulations and carbon-pricing schemes could make carbon-intensive infrastructure assets less attractive or even “stranded”, leading to significant financial losses . Additionally, changes in consumer behaviour, such as a shift toward electric vehicles or renewable energy sources, could render certain infrastructure assets obsolete.

50% potential loss of value

If the energy transition has a cost for private investors (transition risks), so does climate change (physical risks). Extreme weather events, which experts predict will increase over the next few years, thus greatly increase the risk of losing value in portfolios.

In an August 2023 study, “It’s getting physical”, EDHEC Infrastructure and Private Assets Research Institute shows that some investors could see the value of their portfolio fall by more than 50% before 2050. The average investor’s portfolio, which generally holds around 10 assets, could drop by a quarter.

The reason is that over the past two decades, institutional investors – such as insurance companies, mutual and pension funds – have been allocating more and more capital to private infrastructure companies, which operate motorway toll roads, airports, power stations, bridges, pipelines, wind and photovoltaic farms, and so on. This represents a total value of 4.1 trillion dollars in the 25 most active markets. These markets include sectors like renewable energy projects, sustainable infrastructure development, clean technology ventures, electric vehicle manufacturing, carbon offset trading, and green real estate investment, among others. These infrastructures are particularly exposed to climate risks.

In the aftermath of the Covid-19 pandemic, public spending on physical infrastructure has persistently failed to keep up with economic growth; the United States spends only 2.3% of its GDP on infrastructure, compared to 5% for European countries and 8% for China. Still, private-investor exposure appears to be considerable.

27% loss of value on average

To measure the likely losses of infrastructure investors, we randomly constructed thousands of portfolios. To do this, we included hundreds of assets belonging to infrastructure investments across eight industrial superclasses, including transport (air, rail and road), power generation (gas- and coal-fired, nuclear, etc.), renewable energy (wind, solar, hydroelectric, etc.), network utilities (electricity, gas or water distribution), water resources (oil, gas or water pipelines, gas or liquid storage), etc. For all these assets, it is possible to obtain information on the associated climate risks in EDHEC’s InfraMetrics database.

Overall, we observed a high concentration of risk. Most infrastructure investors generally have few assets in their portfolios (between 5 and 20 on average). Their portfolios are poorly diversified, with a relatively limited number of assets held directly by each investor.

Furthermore, portfolios containing infrastructure assets are often concentrated in a single sector – for example, wind farms. In practical terms, an investor who started building a portfolio in 2018 and plans to hold the assets for another 30 years is exposed to losses solely due to physical risks ranging from -54% to -10%, depending on the number of assets held.

In addition, the loss in value of assets exposed to climate change is -27% on average [by 2050]. In a scenario where temperatures rise faster than expected, they could reach 54% for the most-concentrated portfolios. For instance, the “Hot House World” scenario predicts a rise in temperatures of about 3.2ºC above pre-industrial levels by 2100.

Some sectors are also more exposed to climate risks than others. In the transport sector, for example, the loss in net asset value would be four times greater than in the renewable energies sector. Investors in developed countries – in particular the United States, Europe and Australia and others – are the most exposed to losses in value worldwide. Indeed, the more valuable assets are concentrated in a given location, the greater the risk of value destruction.

More inaction, even greater risk

This study shows the scale of the potential losses that investors will have to face. And that’s before the 2050 deadline, as long as climate change predictions remain unchanged. Without action from governments and other stakeholders, climate risks could have a major impact on the overall value of investments, and on the economy as a whole.

However, there is still a glimmer of hope: if the stakeholders manage to organise an effective transition to a low-carbon economy, the losses mentioned in the article could be halved for all investors. All that remains – and this is undoubtedly the most difficult part – is to take action.The Conversation

About the Authors:

Noël Amenc, Professeur de finance, EDHEC Business School; Abhishek Gupta, Associate Director at the EDHEC Infrastructure Institute, EDHEC Business School; Bertrand Jayles, Senior Sustainability Data Scientist, EDHEC Infrastructure & Private Assets Research Institute, EDHEC Business School; Darwin Marcelo, Project Director at the EDHEC Infrastructure & Private Assets Research Institute, EDHEC Business School; Frédéric Blanc-Brude, Directeur de l’EDHEC Infrastructure Institute, EDHEC Business School; Leonard Lum, Data analyst, EDHECinfra, EDHEC Business School; Nishtha Manocha, EDHECinfra Senior Research Engineer, EDHEC Business School, and Qinyu Goh, MSc Urban Science, Sustainability Data Scientist at the EDHEC Infrastructure & Private Assets Research Institute, EDHEC Business School

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Blowout US GDP growth data but it is what’s coming next that matters…

By George Prior 

The strong third-quarter Gross Domestic Product growth for the US economy should not be the focus for investors, warns the CEO of deVere Group.

The warning from Nigel Green, chief executive of one of the world’s largest independent financial advisory, asset management and fintech organizations, comes as GDP, or the sum of all goods and services produced in the US economy, is revealed to be a 4.9% annualized gain for the third quarter.

“This is the strongest output since the fourth quarter of 2021. It appears that consumers are still happy to spend despite the higher interest rates.

“While its important data that shows the resilience of the world’s largest economy, it should not be the focus of investors,” he says.

“This data shows what has already happened. Investors need to focus on what will happen, if they’re serious about preserving their capital and growing their wealth, because the US economy faces serious headwinds in the months ahead.”

The deVere CEO cites three major reasons that indicate the economic trajectory might not be as rosy in the near future.

“First, the bond market is sending red-flag signals that it believes a recession is looming. For more than a year now, we’ve seen an inverted yield curve, which is when the yield on the two-year Treasury has overtaken that of the 10-year note.

“From the 1960s to today, every time the long-term rate was lower than a short-term rate, a recession followed. It’s happened for the last eight recessions – and it’s never been wrong.”

He continues: “Second, the new US Speaker, Mike Johnson, a close ally of Donald Trump, will be less inclined to make deals than Kevin McCarthy.

“Therefore, he’s more likely to affect a partial government shutdown in mid-November in order to try and seize a political advantage.  It is also more likely that under this scenario, a shutdown would be extended – unlike the previous, more symbolic, ones.

“A government shutdown creates uncertainty about the world’s largest economy, budgetary decisions, and the potential for disruptions in federal services. It erodes investor confidence, both domestically and internationally, meaning investors pull back from the US financial markets, leading to a decrease in asset prices and potential capital flight.

“We expect that should a shutdown occur, it will prompt Moody’s to cut the US credit rating below AAA.  This would be the third rating agency to downgrade the US.”

Nigel Green adds: “And third, the Israel-Hamas war will weigh on sentiment as individuals and businesses become more risk averse about spending and investing, which could lead to a recession.

“Also, conflicts in the Middle East tend to lead to spikes in oil prices which can trigger significant uncertainty in global markets.”

Against this backdrop, investors are being urged not to feel “too fuzzy” about the latest Gross Domestic Product growth data for the US economy.

“Investors shouldn’t be complacent about this strong data. They shouldn’t focus on the backward-looking; they should be thinking about what’s next, particularly the headwinds on the horizon.

“We would urge them to review their portfolios to mitigate risks and seize the opportunities that will come from a shifting investment environment,” concludes Nigel Green.

About:

deVere Group is one of the world’s largest independent advisors of specialist global financial solutions to international, local mass affluent, and high-net-worth clients.  It has a network of offices across the world, over 80,000 clients and $12bn under advisement.

Euro shaky ahead of ECB meeting

By ForexTime 

  • ECB expected to pause on rate hikes
  • Inflationary pressures have eased in Europe
  • However, economic outlook paints gloomy picture
  • Hawkish messaging may leave doors open to December hike
  • EURUSD back within range, potential breakout on horizon.

As far as markets are concerned, the European Central Bank (ECB) is expected to leave rates unchanged in October for the first time in over a year, amid signs of cooling inflation. Over the past few months, price pressures have eased in Europe, with the headline rate falling to 4.3% in September, which was the lowest since October 2021.

ECB officials signalled at their previous September meeting that rates were high enough to bring inflation back towards the 2% target. However, concerns are rising about the worsening economic outlook, along with geopolitical tensions in the Middle East.  Indeed, the string of recent disappointing data paints a gloomy picture with recession fears rife as high rates impact households and businesses.

Investors will pay close attention to any fresh clues the ECB has to offer on monetary policy for the rest of 2023 and beyond. Should the ECB communicate that rates will remain higher for longer, this could leave the door open for one final hike in December. As of writing, traders are pricing in only around a 10% probability of an ECB rate hike by December with the odds of a rate cut by April roughly 50%.

Looking at the technical picture, EURUSD remains under pressure on the daily charts.

Prices are back within a wide range with support at 1.0450 and resistance at 1.0630. The euro could find itself under fresh pressure if the ECB strikes a cautious tone and hints that no more hikes are expected down the road. This may drag the EURUSD back towards the 1.0450 support level as a result.

Should the central bank strike a hawkish note, this could push EURUSD back towards 1.0630 and beyond as bets increase on a December rate move.


Forex-Time-LogoArticle by ForexTime

ForexTime Ltd (FXTM) is an award winning international online forex broker regulated by CySEC 185/12 www.forextime.com

US tightening sanctions on Iran oil could impact your investments

By George Prior 

Should the US tighten sanctions on Iran’s crude oil exports in response to the country backing Hamas, it will impact investment portfolios around the world, says the CEO of one of the world’s largest independent financial advisory, asset management and fintech organizations.

The analysis from deVere Group’s Nigel Green comes ahead of a widely expected ground offensive by Israel into Gaza, which could shift the mood music for the West’s response to Iran.

He says: “These sanctions, while driven by geopolitical concerns, are likely to significantly impact portfolios for individual and institutional investors globally. As ever, with increased volatility, there will be fresh opportunities and fresh risks.

“Portfolios that include energy sector assets can be directly affected by the sanctions on Iran’s crude oil. Iran is a major oil producer, and restrictions on its exports can result in a reduction in global oil supply, which, in turn, could boost the profitability of energy companies.

“While some energy stocks may benefit from rising oil prices, others may face challenges due to increased production costs.

“Dividend stocks in the energy sector could see price increases, which might be positive for income-focused investors. However, dividend sustainability may be threatened if higher oil prices lead to increased expenses for energy companies.”

The rise in oil prices due to sanctions can lead to broader economic consequences, particularly in the form of inflation.

“Central banks, which have been battling to bring down multi-decade high inflation peaks over the last two years, may respond to rising inflation by considering increasing interest rates again.

“Higher interest rates make borrowing more expensive for businesses, impacting their expansion plans and investments. This, in turn, affects stock prices and overall portfolio performance.”

Nigel Green continues: “Companies across various industries would also face increased production costs due to higher oil prices. These added expenses can pressure businesses to pass the costs onto consumers, potentially impacting their profitability and share prices.

“Developing economies are particularly vulnerable to oil price spikes. Many of these countries rely heavily on imported oil, and surging prices can strain their trade balances and currencies. As such, investors with heavy exposure to these markets need to be extra cautious as risks are heightened.

“In addition, changes in oil prices influence currency exchange rates. Investors in currency markets may need to navigate these shifts, which can impact the value of their investments.”

Sanctions on Iranian oil can introduce geopolitical risks to your investment portfolio. To mitigate these risks, you need to ensure proper diversification of your portfolio across different asset classes, industries, and geographical regions to spread risk and reduce the impact of sanctions on specific sectors.

Also, you should develop a risk management strategy that includes setting stop-loss orders, adjusting your asset allocation, and staying informed about geopolitical events that can impact your investments.

Working with financial advisors who can provide insights and recommendations tailored to your specific investment goals and risk tolerance is likely to prove highly beneficial.

“The US tightening sanctions on Iranian oil could have a negative impact on individual and institutional investment portfolios by disrupting the energy sector, contributing to inflationary pressures, and intensifying geopolitical risks. You need to be aware of the risks – but also the opportunities,” concludes the deVere Group CEO.

About:

deVere Group is one of the world’s largest independent advisors of specialist global financial solutions to international, local mass affluent, and high-net-worth clients.  It has a network of offices across the world, over 80,000 clients and $12bn under advisement.

Inflationary pressures are rising sharply in Australia. Corporate earnings keep indices from falling

By JustMarkets

As of Tuesday’s stock market close, the Dow Jones Index (US30) was up by 0.54%, while the S&P 500 (US500) increased by 0.73%. The NASDAQ Technology Index (US100) closed positive by 0.93% yesterday. Stocks rose moderately on Tuesday on the back of better-than-expected corporate earnings results. A negative factor for stocks was Tuesday’s stronger-than-expected US manufacturing activity data, which was hawkish for Fed policy. The S&P US manufacturing PMI for October unexpectedly rose to a 6-month high of 50.0, which was stronger than expectations of a decline to 49.5.

General Electric (GE) closed higher by more than 6% after reporting third-quarter adjusted EPS of 82 cents, well above the consensus of 56 cents, and raising its 2023 adjusted EPS guidance. Verizon Communications (VZ) shares are up more than 9%, leading gains in the S&P 500 (US500) and Dow Jones Industrials (US30), after the company reported third-quarter adjusted earnings per share of $1.22, which was better than the consensus estimate of $1.18. Coca-Cola Co (KO) closed higher by more than 3% after reporting 11% organic revenue growth in the third quarter, well above the consensus of 6.91%. Shares of Google Alphabet (GOOG) Inc. are down more than 5% after weaker-than-expected revenue growth from its cloud computing operations. Microsoft (MSFT) reported fiscal first-quarter results on Tuesday that beat Wall Street forecasts, as the tech giant’s investments in artificial intelligence fueled growth in its Azure cloud business. The stock price rose more than 4% after the report was published.

In the Middle East, French President Macron met with Prime Minister Netanyahu in Israel on Tuesday before calling for an international coalition to fight Hamas and warning other Iranian-backed militant groups against opening new fronts in the war between Israel and Hamas.

Equity markets in Europe were mostly up yesterday. Germany’s DAX (DE40) rose by 0.54%, France’s CAC 40 (FR40) gained 0.63% on Tuesday, Spain’s IBEX 35 (ES35) fell by 0.28%, and the UK’s FTSE 100 (UK100) closed positive 0.20%.

The Eurozone manufacturing PMI for October unexpectedly fell by 0.4 to 43.0, weaker than expectations of a rise to 43.7. The German GfK consumer confidence index for November fell by 1.4 to a 7-month low of 28.1, weaker than expectations of 27.0. In her speech yesterday, ECB President Lagarde told the Presidents of the European Commission, European Council, and Eurogroup that stagnation and downside risks await the Eurozone economy in the next few quarters, although inflation risks have become more balanced.

Asian markets were predominantly up yesterday. Japan’s Nikkei 225 (JP225) increased by 0.20%, China’s FTSE China A50 (CHA50) added 0.03%, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng (HK50) ended the day down by 1.05%, and Australia’s ASX 200 (AU200) ended Tuesday positive 0.19%. Chinese stocks continued their recovery rally on Wednesday after the government announced plans for a massive bond issue. Beijing announced plans to issue 1 trillion yuan ($1=7.3088 yuan) worth of government bonds to support the economy. Nevertheless, Chinese stocks remain near 2023 lows, having suffered significant losses on fears of slowing economic growth and a collapse in the real estate market. Despite Wednesday’s optimism, the factors that drove domestic markets lower are still in place.

Japan’s business activity index for the manufacturing sector for October was unchanged at 48.5. The services PMI for October fell by 2.7 to 51.1, the lowest reading in 10 months.

In Australia, the consumer price index unexpectedly rose. In annual terms, the inflation rate rose from 5.2% to 5.6%. In quarterly terms, the index rose from 0.8% to 1.2%. Such data gives grounds for further interest rate increase by the Reserve Bank of Australia next week.

S&P 500 (F)(US500) 4,247.68 +30.64 (+0.73%)

Dow Jones (US30) 33,141.38 +204.97 (+0.62%)

DAX (DE40)  14,879.94  +79.22 (+0.54%)

FTSE 100 (UK100) 7,389.70 +14.87 +(0.20%)

USD Index  106.26 +0.73 (+0.69%)

News feed for 2023.10.25:
  • – Australia Consumer Price Index (m/m) at 03:30 (GMT+3);
  • – German Ifo Business Climate (m/m) at 11:00 (GMT+3);
  • – US Building Permits (m/m) at 15:00 (GMT+3);
  • – US New Home Sales (m/m) at 17:00 (GMT+3);
  • – Canada BoC Monetary Policy Report at 17:00 (GMT+3);
  • – Canada BoC Interest Rate Decision at 17:00 (GMT+3);
  • – US Crude Oil Reserves (w/w) at 17:30 (GMT+3);
  • – Canada BoC Press Conference at 18:00 (GMT+3);
  • – Eurozone ECB President Lagarde Speaks at 20:00 (GMT+3);
  • – US Fed Chair Powell Speaks at 23:35 (GMT+3).

By JustMarkets

 

This article reflects a personal opinion and should not be interpreted as an investment advice, and/or offer, and/or a persistent request for carrying out financial transactions, and/or a guarantee, and/or a forecast of future events.

The situation in the Middle East has a negative impact on market sentiment

By JustMarkets

American stock indices traded yesterday without any unified dynamics. At Monday’s close, the Dow Jones Index (US30) decreased by 0.58%, while the S&P 500 Index (US500) was down by 0.17%. The NASDAQ Technology Index (US100) closed positive by 0.27%. The decline in T bond yields on Monday was bearish for the US dollar and bullish for stock indices. The dollar on Monday initially found support in the jump in the 10-year bond yield to a new 16-year high, but then bond yields reversed and headed lower. From a fundamental perspective, the tightening of financial conditions in the US is certainly reducing the need for further monetary tightening, and many US Fed officials have moved to a less hawkish tone. Markets are currently pricing in just a 2% chance that the FOMC will raise the lending rate by 25 bps at its next meeting, which ends on November 1, and a 23% chance that the rate will be raised by 25 bps at its December 13 meeting.

The fear that the war between Israel and Hamas could escalate into a regional conflict is weighing on market sentiment. Western countries stepped up efforts to prevent the war between Israel and Hamas from escalating, and EU leaders supported the UN’s call for a “humanitarian pause” in the war. President Biden held talks with the presidents of Canada, France, Germany, and Italy to strengthen coordination among the allies. At the same time, late yesterday, there was news of explosions at three US military bases in the Middle East. This news interrupted Biden’s live-streamed remarks. Intelligence reports indicate that Iranian-backed militias are poised to step up attacks on US troops in the Middle East. Israel has said it supports diplomatic efforts to get Hamas to release hostages from Gaza, which could delay a possible ground invasion, but is not going to wait long to launch a ground offensive. Iran and its proxy forces in Lebanon, Iraq, and Yemen have warned they could retaliate against Israel if Israeli troops enter Gaza.

Equity markets in Europe traded flat yesterday. Germany’s DAX (DE40) rose by 0.02%, France’s CAC 40 (FR40) added 0.50% on Monday, Spain’s IBEX 35 (ES35) decreased by 0.37%, and the UK’s FTSE 100 (UK100) closed negative by 0.37%.

British consumers are curbing their spending ahead of the festive season, and the latest survey from Gfk suggests that the weather is not the only reason for this. Retail sales fell by 0.9% in September, well above expectations of a 0.3% decline. The Gfk Consumer Confidence Index fell back to 30. The outlook for the British economy remains bleak as growth is sluggish, and recent economic indicators point to a slowdown in manufacturing activity, while UK inflation remains stubbornly high.

The potential for an escalation of the conflict between Israel and Hamas and poor corporate earnings have left investors looking for safe havens, of which there are few left. The US dollar is not in the best position at the moment, as the US Federal Reserve does not plan to continue its tightening policy in the near future. According to economists, apart from the US dollar, only gold and the Swiss franc remain as safe havens. The Swiss franc is a longtime safe haven asset that recently hit its highest level against the euro since 2015 and has held up against the losses of its traditional peers.

Last Wednesday, the US said it would ease sanctions on Venezuela’s oil exports for six months in exchange for measures to ensure the country holds fair presidential elections next year. The easing of sanctions will bring additional oil supplies to the global market, which some analysts estimate will be about 200,000 barrels per day. However, oil traders believe that tension in the oil market will still remain due to the extension of the OPEC+ agreement on production cuts.

Asian markets were mostly declining yesterday. Japan’s Nikkei 225 (JP225) decreased by 0.83%, China’s FTSE China A50 (CHA50) was down by 0.62%, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng (HK50) lost 0.72% on the day, and Australia’s ASX 200 (AU200) was negative by 0.82% on Monday. On Tuesday, most Asian stocks extended losses after weak business activity data in Japan and Australia. At the same time, Chinese markets rebounded from pre-pandemic lows thanks to a government fund starting to buy some stocks.

Japanese government bond (JGB) yields rose to new multi-year highs on Monday as investors assess the likelihood that the Bank of Japan will continue to adjust its yield curve control (YCC) policy next week. One possibility being discussed is an increase in the 1% ceiling for the 10-year yield.

S&P 500 (F)(US500) 4,217.04 −7.12 (−0.17%)

Dow Jones (US30) 32,936.41 −190.87 (−0.58%)

DAX (DE40)  14,800.72 +2.25 (+0.015%)

FTSE 100 (UK100) 7,374.83 −27.31 (−0.37%)

USD Index  105.62 −0.54 (−0.51%)

News feed for 2023.10.24:
  • – Australia Manufacturing PMI (m/m) at 01:00 (GMT+3);
  • – Australia Services PMI (m/m) at 01:00 (GMT+3);
  • – Japan Manufacturing PMI (m/m) at 03:30 (GMT+3);
  • – Japan Services PMI (m/m) at 03:30 (GMT+3);
  • – UK Unemployment Rate (m/m) at 09:00 (GMT+3);
  • – German Manufacturing PMI (m/m) at 10:30 (GMT+3);
  • – German Services PMI (m/m) at 10:30 (GMT+3);
  • – Australia RBA Gov Bullock Speaks at 11:00 (GMT+3);
  • – Eurozone Manufacturing PMI (m/m) at 11:00 (GMT+3);
  • – Eurozone Services PMI (m/m) at 11:00 (GMT+3);
  • – UK Manufacturing PMI (m/m) at 11:30 (GMT+3);
  • – UK Services PMI (m/m) at 11:30 (GMT+3);
  • – Eurozone ECB President Lagarde Speaks at 15:30 (GMT+3);
  • – US Manufacturing PMI (m/m) at 16:45 (GMT+3);
  • – US Services PMI (m/m) at 16:45 (GMT+3).

By JustMarkets

 

This article reflects a personal opinion and should not be interpreted as an investment advice, and/or offer, and/or a persistent request for carrying out financial transactions, and/or a guarantee, and/or a forecast of future events.

Warning: The anti-ESG movement could hit your wealth

By George Prior 

The backlash against ESG – the use of environmental, social, and governance factors in investing – could hit your wealth, warns the CEO and founder of one of the world’s largest independent financial advisory, asset management and fintech organizations.

The warning from Nigel Green of deVere Group comes as the IEA’s World Energy Outlook for 2023 published on Tuesday reveals that demand for oil, coal and natural gas is set to peak by 2030.

It also follows findings from a separate report published in the journal Nature Communications that damage from the global climate crisis has amounted to $391 million per day over the past two decades.

The deVere CEO says: “The International Energy Agency’s World Energy Outlook shows that there’s a major evolution taking place in how the planet is powered. From 2030, oil, coal and natural gas will play a significantly less dominant role.

“The unprecedented rise of clean energy technologies, including wind, solar, heat pumps and electric cars, will play a vital role.

“Yet despite this evidence that cleaner energy is the future – and, therefore ,should be uncontroversially appealing to investors – the anti-ESG movement is real and is growing.”

In a recent survey by The Conference Board of more than 100 large US companies, almost half said they have already “experienced ESG backlash”, and 61% anticipate it to continue or intensify over the next two years.

“Much of this has been focused on the financial industry, and large asset managers in particular, which means that your investments could be being repositioned away from ESG.  This, we believe, could have a longer-term, detrimental impact on your wealth.”

Nigel Green continues: “Anti-ESG proponents, including some financial advisors, often argue that ESG investing is just a trend that will eventually fizzle out. However, the data suggests otherwise.

“The growing emphasis on ESG factors is not just a fleeting fashion, but rather a reflection of changing market dynamics and consumer preferences. Ignoring these shifts would put a company’s stock performance at risk – and therefore, potentially, your investments.”

“Anti-ESG proponents may encourage you to miss out on profitable investment opportunities. Numerous studies have shown that companies with strong ESG performance often outperform their peers. Ignoring this data may lead to missed opportunities for portfolio growth,” he notes.

One of the primary drivers of ESG investing is risk mitigation. “Companies that perform well in ESG criteria tend to be better prepared to navigate a range of challenges, from environmental disasters to social controversies.  Again, if you overlook these considerations, you may find your investment portfolio vulnerable to unforeseen risks that can lead to financial losses.”

An undeniable fact is that governments and regulatory bodies are increasingly recognising the importance of ESG factors. Ignoring ESG criteria can expose companies – and therefore their investors – to regulatory risks, including fines and legal liabilities associated with non-compliance with evolving ESG regulations.

Nigel Green concludes: “The anti-ESG movement – which is alive and well and becoming increasingly powerful – fails to see the bigger, longer-term picture.

“Our concern is that people will be coerced into this narrow, backward-looking view and miss out on major opportunities that could negatively affect their prospects for growing and safeguarding their wealth.”

About:

deVere Group is one of the world’s largest independent advisors of specialist global financial solutions to international, local mass affluent, and high-net-worth clients.  It has a network of offices across the world, over 80,000 clients and $12bn under advisement.

Lego’s ESG dilemma: Why an abandoned plan to use recycled plastic bottles is a wake-up call for supply chain sustainability

By Tinglong Dai, Johns Hopkins University; Christopher S. Tang, University of California, Los Angeles, and Hau L. Lee, Stanford University 

Lego, the world’s largest toy manufacturer, has built a reputation not only for the durability of its bricks, designed to last for decades, but also for its substantial investment in sustainability. The company has pledged US$1.4 billion to reduce carbon emissions by 2025, despite netting annual profits of just over $2 billion in 2022.

This commitment isn’t just for show. Lego sees its core customers as children and their parents, and sustainability is fundamentally about ensuring that future generations inherit a planet as hospitable as the one we enjoy today.

So it was surprising when the Financial Times reported on Sept. 25, 2023, that Lego had pulled out of its widely publicized “Bottles to Bricks” initiative.

This ambitious project aimed to replace traditional Lego plastic with a new material made from recycled plastic bottles. However, when Lego assessed the project’s environmental impact throughout its supply chain, it found that producing bricks with the recycled plastic would require extra materials and energy to make them durable enough. Because this conversion process would result in higher carbon emissions, the company decided to stick with its current fossil fuel-based materials while continuing to search for more sustainable alternatives.

As experts in global supply chains and sustainability, we believe Lego’s pivot is the beginning of a larger trend toward developing sustainable solutions for entire supply chains in a circular economy. New regulations in the European Union – and expected in California – are about to speed things up.

Examining all the emissions, cradle to grave

Business leaders are increasingly integrating environmental, social and governance factors, commonly known as ESG, into their operational and strategic frameworks. But the pursuit of sustainability requires attention to the entire life cycle of a product, from its materials and manufacturing processes to its use and ultimate disposal.

The results can lead to counterintuitive outcomes, as Lego discovered.

Understanding a company’s entire carbon footprint requires looking at three types of emissions: Scope 1 emissions are generated directly by a company’s internal operations. Scope 2 emissions are caused by generating the electricity, steam, heat or cooling a company consumes. And scope 3 emissions are generated by a company’s supply chain, from upstream suppliers to downstream distributors and end customers.

Lists of examples of sope 1, 2, 3 emissions sources with an illustration of a factory in the center
What scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions involve.
Chester Hawkins/Center for American Progress

Currently, fewer than 30% of companies report meaningful scope 3 emissions, in part because these emissions are difficult to track. Yet, companies’ scope 3 emissions are on average 11.4 times greater than their scope 1 emissions, data from corporate disclosures reported to the nonprofit CDP show.

Lego is a case study of this lopsided distribution and the importance of tracking scope 3 emissions. A staggering 98% of Lego’s carbon emissions are categorized as scope 3.

From 2020 to 2021, the company’s total emissions increased by 30%, amid surging demand for Lego sets during the COVID-19 lockdowns – even though the company’s scope 2 emissions related to purchased energy such as electricity decreased by 40%. The increase was almost entirely in its scope 3 emissions.

Lego’s tour of how its toy bricks are made doesn’t address the supply chain, where most of Lego’s greenhouse gas emissions originate.

As more companies follow in Lego’s footsteps and begin reporting scope 3 emissions, they will likely find themselves in the same position, realizing that efforts to reduce carbon emissions often boil down to supply chain and consumer-use emissions. And the results may force them to make some tough choices.

Policy and disclosure: The next frontier

New regulations in the European Union and pending in California are designed to increase corporate emissions transparency by including supply chain emissions.

The EU in June 2023 adopted the first set of European Sustainability Reporting Standards, which will require publicly traded companies in the EU to disclose their scope 3 emissions, starting in their reports for fiscal year 2024.

California’s legislature passed similar legislation requiring companies with revenues of more than $1 billion to disclose their scope 3 emissions. California’s governor has until Oct. 14, 2023, to consider the bill and is expected to sign it.

At the federal level, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission released a proposal in March 2022 that, if finalized, would require all public companies to report climate-related risk and emissions data, including scope 3 emissions. After receiving significant pushback, the SEC began reconsidering the scope 3 reporting rule. But SEC Chairman Gary Gensler suggested during a congressional hearing in late September 2023 that California’s move could influence federal regulators’ decision.

SEC Chairman Gary Gensler explains the importance of climate-related risk disclosures.

This increased focus on disclosure of scope 3 emissions will undoubtedly increase pressure on companies.

Because scope 3 emissions are significant, yet often not measured or reported, consumers are rightly concerned that companies that claim to have low emissions may be greenwashing without taking action to reduce emissions in their supply chains to combat climate change.

At the same time, we suspect that as more investors support sustainable investing, they may prefer to invest in companies that are transparent in disclosing all areas of emissions. Ultimately, we believe consumers, investors and governments will demand more than lip service from companies. Instead, they’ll expect companies to take actionable steps to reduce the most significant part of a company’s carbon footprint – scope 3 emissions.

A journey, not a destination

The Lego example serves as a cautionary tale in the complex ESG landscape for which most companies are not well prepared. As more companies come under scrutiny for their entire carbon footprint, we may see more instances where well-intentioned sustainability efforts run into uncomfortable truths.

This calls for a nuanced understanding of sustainability, not as a checklist of good deeds, but as a complex, ongoing process that requires vigilance, transparency and, above all, a commitment to the benefit of future generations.The Conversation

About the Author:

Tinglong Dai, Professor of Operations Management & Business Analytics, Carey Business School, Johns Hopkins University; Christopher S. Tang, Professor of Supply Chain Management, University of California, Los Angeles, and Hau L. Lee, Professor of Operations, Information & Technology, Stanford University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

The situation in the Middle East is heating up. Inflation data in China disappointed investors

By JustMarkets

At Wednesday’s stock market close, the Dow Jones Index (US30) decreased by 0.51%, while the S&P 500 Index (US500) lost 0.62%. The NASDAQ Technology Index (US100) closed yesterday negative by 0.63%. Stocks posted moderate losses on Thursday amid a stronger-than-expected US CPI report for September. In addition, weekly US initial jobless claims remained unchanged, which was hawkish for Fed policy. Thursday’s hawkish reports keep the likelihood of another Fed rate hike this year alive. Stocks continued to lose ground Thursday afternoon as T-bond yields rose further amid weak demand at the $20 billion auction of 30-year Treasury bonds.

Concerns that the conflict between Israel and Hamas will spread to the Middle East was another negative factor for stocks amid reports that Israel launched airstrikes on major airports in Damascus and Aleppo in Syria. In turn, Iran has begun moving military equipment to its western border. Whether this equipment will travel further through Iraq toward Israel is still unknown, but the geopolitical risks of another major war have increased significantly in recent days.

The US Consumer Price Index for September came in at 3.7% y/y, unchanged from August and stronger than the 3.6% y/y decline. The core CPI excluding food and energy for September declined to 4.1% y/y from 4.3% y/y in August, which was in line with expectations. US weekly initial jobless claims were unchanged at 209,000, indicating a slight strengthening of the labor market compared to expectations of a rise to 210,000.

FRB Boston President Collins commented that she favors a pause in Fed rate hikes.

Equity markets in Europe traded lower yesterday. Germany’s DAX (DE40) decreased by 0.23%, France’s CAC 40 (FR40) lost 0.37% on Thursday, Spain’s IBEX 35 (ES35) was 0.26% cheaper, and the UK’s FTSE 100 (UK100) closed positive by 0.32%.

ECB Governing Council spokesperson Centeno said yesterday, “At the current level of interest rates, we will make a significant contribution to the 2% inflation target. We will achieve this target by continuing with this monetary policy stance, holding it for some time until we are fully confident that inflation is falling.” Another representative of the ECB Governing Council, Wunsch, said, “If we continue to see inflation figures in line with the forecast, we will not need to raise interest rates again.” Minutes from the ECB’s September 13-14 meeting showed that the risks of too much tightening and too little tightening have become more balanced and the ECB will hold off on raising interest rates.

Crude oil prices gave up early gains on Thursday amid a stronger dollar and after the EIA’s weekly crude oil inventories report showed an unexpected rise in crude stockpiles and US crude production hit a record high. Oil initially opened higher on Thursday on concerns over the escalating conflict between Israel and Hamas. Oil was also supported by comments from Saudi Arabia’s Energy Minister, Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman, who said oil producers will continue to work together and be proactive to keep the oil market balanced.

Asian markets were predominantly rising yesterday. Japan’s Nikkei 225 (JP225) rose by 1.75%, China’s FTSE China A50 (CHA50) gained 0.85%, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng (HK50) rose by 1.93% and Australia’s ASX 200 (AU200) ended the day positive by 0.04%.

In China, the Consumer Price Index (CPI) was unchanged in September, missing forecasts for a 0.2% y/y rise. In August, the CPI rose by 0.1% y/y. On an annualized basis, core inflation, excluding food and fuel prices, was up by 0.8%, the same as in August. The Producer Price Index (PPI) fell to 2.5% y/y, marking the 12th consecutive negative month, although the rate of decline slowed from August. Economists had forecast a drop to 2.4% y/y. CPI inflation at zero indicates that deflationary pressures in China remain a real threat to the economy. The recovery in domestic demand will not be strong without significant stimulus from the government.

S&P 500 (F)(US500) 4,349.61 −27.34 (−0.62%)

Dow Jones (US30) 33,631.14 −173.73 (−0.51%)

DAX (DE40)  15,425.03 −34.98 (−0.23%)

FTSE 100 (UK100) 7,644.78 +24.75 (+0.32%)

USD Index  106.58 +0.76 (+0.72%)

News feed for 2023.10.13:
  • – Singapore GDP (q/q) at 03:00 (GMT+3);
  • – China Consumer Price Index (m/m) at 04:30 (GMT+3);
  • – China Producer Price Index (m/m) at 04:30 (GMT+3);
  • – China Trade Balance (m/m) at 06:00 (GMT+3);
  • – Sweden Consumer Price Index (m/m) at 09:00 (GMT+3);
  • – Switzerland Producer Price Index (m/m) at 09:30 (GMT+3);
  • – UK BoE Gov Bailey Speaks at 11:00 (GMT+3);
  • – Eurozone Industrial Production (m/m) at 12:00 (GMT+3);
  • – US FOMC Member Harker Speaks at 16:00 (GMT+3);
  • – Eurozone ECB President Lagarde Speaks (m/m) at 16:00 (GMT+3);
  • – US Michigan Consumer Sentiment (m/m) at 17:00 (GMT+3).

By JustMarkets

 

This article reflects a personal opinion and should not be interpreted as an investment advice, and/or offer, and/or a persistent request for carrying out financial transactions, and/or a guarantee, and/or a forecast of future events.

US CPI comes in above expectations – what should you do with investments?

By George Prior 

US Consumer Price Index (CPI) data published Thursday supports the case that the Federal Reserve will likely implement one more interest rate hike, says the CEO of one of the world’s leading financial advisory, asset management and fintech organizations.

The prediction from Nigel Green of deVere Group comes as September CPI inflation rises 3.7%, above expectations of 3.6%. US CPI is now up for four consecutive months. Core CPI inflation fell to 4.1%, in line with expectations.

He comments: “Taking into account the latest US CPI data, and the minutes from the most recent Federal Reserve meeting, which were published on Monday, we expect there to be one last 25 basis point hike at its two-day meeting beginning October 31.

“The Fed will be conscious of growing uncertainty of the trajectory of the world’s largest economy and the risks of overtightening – especially in times of growing geopolitical uncertainty; while at the same time, want to avoid complacency in the continuing battle against inflation.”

The deVere CEO continues: “As a result, we expect that interest rates will still continue to remain higher for longer.”

Based on the assertion that interest rate hikes are likely to be nearing an end, and high-interest rates are expected to continue, investors may want to consider rebalancing their portfolios.

“Financial institutions, such as banks and insurance companies, tend to benefit from higher interest rates as they can charge more for loans and earn higher yields on their investments. A portfolio allocation to financial services stocks or exchange-traded funds (ETFs) may be considered,” says Nigel Green.

“The energy sector also benefits from a robust economy and high interest rates. It’s typically positively correlated with economic growth and tends to perform well in such environments.

“Certain segments of the consumer discretionary sector, such as automotive, housing, and luxury goods, can perform well when interest rates are high. Consumer spending can remain strong, particularly if the economy is healthy, and these industries can benefit.

“Industrial companies often benefit from increased infrastructure spending and a robust economy. With expectations of continued high interest rates, these companies are likely to see growth opportunities in construction, manufacturing, and transportation.”

He goes on to add: “While technology stocks can be sensitive to interest rate changes, some tech companies continue to thrive in a high-interest rate environment, especially those with strong fundamentals and growth potential.

“Meanwhile, the healthcare sector is typically less sensitive to interest rate changes, making it a relatively stable option for a portfolio, as will essential goods, such as food, beverages, and household products.”

As ever, an investor’s best tool for mitigating risk and seizing opportunities is to remain properly diversified and by working with an independent financial advisor.

The FOMC since March 2022 has raised its key interest rate 11 times, taking it to a targeted range of 5.25%-5.5%, the highest level in 22 years.

Nigel Green concludes: “We don’t think we’re at the end of the hiking cycle just yet, even though we’re close, and rates will continue to be high, potentially impacting your investment portfolio.”

About:

deVere Group is one of the world’s largest independent advisors of specialist global financial solutions to international, local mass affluent, and high-net-worth clients.  It has a network of offices across the world, over 80,000 clients and $12bn under advisement.