Archive for Economics & Fundamentals – Page 4

European indices hit new highs. Oil prices jump 4%

By JustMarkets 

On Wednesday, trading on the US stock market concluded with moderate gains. By the end of the day, the Dow Jones index (US30) rose by 0.23%. The S&P 500 (US500) climbed by 0.56%. The tech-heavy Nasdaq (US100) closed higher by 0.80%. The minutes from the January FOMC meeting revealed a divergence of positions within the US Federal Reserve regarding the future rate trajectory. Some participants allow for a resumption of federal funds rate cuts if inflation slows further, while others insist on maintaining current policy parameters for an extended period, and some do not rule out tightening in the event of persistently elevated price pressure. At the same time, the majority noted a decrease in risks to the labor market but highlighted lingering threats from inflation. The overall tone of the document emphasizes a cautious approach and the dependence of future decisions on incoming macro data.

European markets ended Tuesday with gains. Germany’s DAX (DE40) rose by 1.12%, France’s CAC 40 (FR40) closed up 0.81%, Spain’s IBEX 35 (ES35) gained 1.35%, and the UK’s FTSE 100 (UK100) closed up 1.23%. The French CAC 40 Index hit a new all-time high at 8,429 points amid slowing inflation and steady demand for defense and financial stocks. Annual price growth in France fell to 0.3% in January, a low since late 2020, which bolstered expectations that the ECB will maintain a dovish course. The British FTSE 100 also reached a record high, exceeding 10,691 points, as UK inflation slowed to 3%, its lowest level since March 2025. Lower prices for fuel, airfare, food, and education fueled expectations of Bank of England policy easing, supporting demand for equities.

WTI prices jumped by more than 4%, exceeding $65 per barrel and hitting monthly highs amid supply tightening and strengthening demand in Asia. According to the International Energy Agency, winter disruptions and export restrictions reduced global production by approximately 1.2 million barrels per day in January, while active purchasing from China and India further tightened available volumes on international markets. Geopolitical tensions in the Middle East and risks to shipping through the Strait of Hormuz added to the risk premium.

Palladium (XPD) prices exceeded $1,700, reaching a weekly high amid a general strengthening of platinum group metals despite a strong dollar. Prices were further supported by signals from China, where new measures to stabilize the automotive sector are intended to offset a sharp drop in sales in January. Expectations of an automotive market recovery are boosting demand prognoses for palladium, which is widely used in catalytic converters.
Asian markets traded mostly higher yesterday. Japan’s Nikkei 225 (JP225) rose by 1.02%, China’s FTSE China A50 (CHA50) will not trade for the entire week due to Lunar New Year celebrations, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng (HK50) also did not trade yesterday, and Australia’s ASX 200 (AU200) showed a positive result of 0.54%.

The Australian dollar (AUD) strengthened to 0.706, holding near three-year highs on the back of resilient employment data. Unemployment remained at 4.1% in January, a seven-month low, while the number of employed persons increased by 17.8k, confirming labor market tightness and strengthening the case for further Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) policy tightening. Markets increased the probability of a rate hike to 4.10% in May to approximately 77%, although most analysts still expect a pause in March. Since the beginning of the year, the currency has gained more than 5.5%, becoming one of the strongest in the G10 group.

The New Zealand dollar (NZD) recovered to 0.597 after a sharp drop the previous day caused by a dovish signal from the Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ). At the first meeting chaired by Anna Breman, the regulator kept the rate at 2.25% and signaled that supportive policy would remain as inflation is expected to return to the midpoint of the target range within the year. While the possibility of a rate hike later this year remains, it will depend on actual economic dynamics and is not yet fully priced in. Following the decision, the market adjusted expectations, shifting the likely timing of tightening closer to the end of 2026.

S&P 500 (US500) 6,881.32 +38.10 (+0.56%)

Dow Jones (US30) 49,663.03 +129.84 (+0.26%)

DAX (DE40) 25,278.21 +279.81 (+1.12%)

FTSE 100 (UK100) 10,686.18 +130.01 (+1.23%)

USD Index 97.73 +0.57% (+0.59%)

News feed for: 2026.02.19

  • Australia Unemployment Rate (m/m) at 02:30 (GMT+2); – AUD (HIGH)
  • Indonesia BI Interest Rate Decision at 09:30 (GMT+2); – IDR (MED)
  • Canada Trade Balance (m/m) at 15:30 (GMT+2); – CAD (MED)
  • US Trade Balance (m/m) at 15:30 (GMT+2); – USD (MED)
  • US Initial Jobless Claims (w/w) at 15:30 (GMT+2); – USD (MED)
  • US Natural Gas Reserves (w/w) at 17:30 (GMT+2); – XNG (HIGH)
  • US Crude Oil Reserves (w/w) at 19:00 (GMT+2); – WTI (HIGH)
  • New Zealand Trade Balance (q/q) at 23:45 (GMT+2). – NZD (MED)

By JustMarkets

 

This article reflects a personal opinion and should not be interpreted as an investment advice, and/or offer, and/or a persistent request for carrying out financial transactions, and/or a guarantee, and/or a forecast of future events.

RBNZ holds rates as expected and confirms dovish stance. Inflation declines in Canada

By JustMarkets 

On Tuesday, trading on the US stock market concluded with moderate gains. By the end of the day, the Dow Jones Index (US30) rose by 0.07%. The S&P 500 (US500) climbed by 0.10%. The tech-heavy Nasdaq (US100) closed higher by 0.14%. The financial sector outperformed the broader market: shares of JPMorgan Chase and Citigroup strengthened following statements from FOMC representatives regarding the likely maintenance of tight policy, which supports expectations for net interest margins. Investors are now awaiting the publication of the regulator’s minutes and core PCE inflation data to assess the sustainability of the disinflationary trend.

The Canadian dollar (CAD) weakened to 1.367 per US dollar, retreating from a 16-month high reached in late January amid slowing inflation and deteriorating foreign trade conditions. Consumer price growth slowed to 2.3% in January, while the Bank of Canada’s (BoC) core indicator dropped to 2.4%. This reinforced expectations of a pause in policy tightening at a rate of 2.25% and narrowed the yield differential that had previously supported the currency. Additional pressure is coming from the commodities factor: oil quotes are being held back amid discussions within OPEC+ regarding a potential production increase starting in April.

European markets ended the day with gains. Germany’s DAX (DE40) rose by 0.80%, France’s CAC 40 (FR40) closed up 0.54%, Spain’s IBEX 35 (ES35) gained 0.60%, and the UK’s FTSE 100 (UK100) closed up 0.79%. The German DAX 40 closed Tuesday at 24,998 points, a one-week high, reflecting improved sentiment across European trading floors.

WTI oil prices held above $62 per barrel, breaking the recent decline as markets assessed the outcome of negotiations between the US and Iran regarding the nuclear program. Tehran reported reaching a general understanding on key points of a potential deal, while the American side announced the continuation of dialogue in Geneva. However, uncertainty remains: Iran temporarily restricted shipping in the Strait of Hormuz due to military exercises, and the US dispatched a second aircraft carrier to the region.

Platinum (XPT) prices dropped to approximately $2,000 per ounce, hitting a two-month low amid a general decline in the precious metals segment and reduced trading activity due to holidays in Asia and the US. Despite the slowdown in US inflation, which bolstered expectations of Fed rate cuts later this year, investors remain cautious ahead of the release of new data and the regulator’s minutes.

Natural gas (XNG) prices in the US fell by 5% to approximately $3.07 per MMBtu, hitting a low since October. Pressure on quotes was intensified by near-record production volumes and prognoses of warmer weather through early March, which weakens heating demand and allows for the accumulation of large inventories in storage. Average production in the Lower 48 states rose to 108.5 billion cubic feet per day (bcf/d) in February, up from 106.3 billion in January, with daily figures recently hitting 111 billion bcf/d, approaching historic highs. Additional market support comes from rising exports to LNG terminals, which increased to 18.6 bcf/d in February and could surpass the December record.

Asian markets traded without a uniform trend yesterday. Japan’s Nikkei 225 (JP225) declined by 0.42%, China’s FTSE China A50 (CHA50) will not trade for the entire week due to Lunar New Year celebrations, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng (HK50) also did not trade yesterday, and Australia’s ASX 200 (AU200) showed a positive result of 0.24%.

The New Zealand dollar (NZD) declined to $0.601 following the Reserve Bank of New Zealand’s (RBNZ) decision to maintain the key rate and confirm a dovish policy stance. The regulator signaled that supportive conditions will remain in the near term, and further steps will be gradual as the economy strengthens and inflation returns to the target level. Meanwhile, updated expectations allow for a possible 25 bp rate hike as early as the end of the year – significantly earlier than previous guidance for 2027.

S&P 500 (US500) 6,843.24 +7.07 (+0.10%)

Dow Jones (US30) 49,533.19 +32.26 (+0.07)

DAX (DE40) 24,998.40 +197.49 (+0.80%)

FTSE 100 (UK100) 10,556.17 +82.48 (+0.79%)

USD Index 97.16 +0.24% (+0.25%)

News feed for: 2026.02.18

  • Japan Trade Balance (m/m) at 01:50 (GMT+2); – JPY (LOW)
  • Australia Wage Price Index (m/m) at 02:30 (GMT+2); – AUD (MED)
  • New Zealand RNBZ Interest Rate Decision at 03:00 (GMT+2); – NZD (HIGH)
  • New Zealand RNBZ Monetary Policy Statement at 03:00 (GMT+2); – NZD (HIGH)
  • New Zealand RNBZ Press Conference at 04:00 (GMT+2); – NZD (MED)
  • UK Inflation Rate (m/m) at 09:00 (GMT+2); – GBP (HIGH)
  • US Durable Goods Orders (m/m) at 15:30 (GMT+2); – USD (MED)
  • US Building Permits (m/m) at 15:30 (GMT+2); – USD (LOW)
  • US Industrial Production (m/m) at 16:15 (GMT+2); – USD (LOW)
  • US FOMC Meeting Minutes at 21:00 (GMT+2). – USD (HIGH)

By JustMarkets

 

This article reflects a personal opinion and should not be interpreted as an investment advice, and/or offer, and/or a persistent request for carrying out financial transactions, and/or a guarantee, and/or a forecast of future events.

RBA minutes provide no clear guidance. Markets watch second round of US-Iran talks

By JustMarkets 

There was no trading on the US stock market on Monday.

European markets ended Monday mixed, maintaining the subdued momentum of the previous week as investors assessed the impact of a strong euro and expectations that benchmark rates will remain unchanged. Germany’s DAX (DE40) declined by 0.46%, France’s CAC 40 (FR40) closed up 0.06%, Spain’s IBEX 35 (ES35) gained 0.99%, and the UK’s FTSE 100 (UK100) closed up 0.26%. Trading activity was low due to holidays in North America and China.

The Swiss franc (CHF) traded around 0.77 per US dollar, remaining near historic highs amid expectations that the Swiss National Bank (SNB) will maintain a loose monetary policy in the near term. Safe-haven demand continues to provide additional support to the currency, though its influence has diminished slightly of late. Preliminary Q4 GDP data showed economic growth of 0.2% following a 0.5% contraction in Q3. This points to the relative resilience of the Swiss economy even under external pressure, including the 39% tariffs imposed by the Donald Trump administration.

On Tuesday, silver (XAG) fell by more than 2% to drop below $76 per ounce, continuing a three-week correction amid low liquidity due to holiday closures in China, Hong Kong, and several other Asian countries. The speculative surge in January, largely driven by Chinese traders, has been replaced by a sharp reversal, prompting regulators to take measures to mitigate market risks. After reaching record levels above $120 in late January, prices fell toward $64 early this month due to the closing of leveraged positions and forced asset liquidations.

West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil prices fluctuated near $63 per barrel on Monday following two consecutive weeks of declines. Markets are monitoring the second round of negotiations between the US and Iran amid an increased US military presence in the region and tough rhetoric from Donald Trump. Iran, for its part, has signaled a readiness to make concessions on its nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief. Despite the geopolitics, pressure on prices persists due to oversupply. OPEC+ nations are discussing a potential production increase in April, while the International Energy Agency confirmed its projections of a significant oil surplus in 2026 and lowered its estimate for global demand growth.

Asian markets traded without a uniform trend last week. Japan’s Nikkei 225 (JP225) fell by 0.24%, China’s FTSE China A50 (CHA50) will not trade for the entire week due to Lunar New Year celebrations, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng (HK50) rose by 0.52%, and Australia’s ASX 200 (AU200) showed a positive result of 0.22%.

On Tuesday, the Australian dollar (AUD) fell toward $0.70 after the publication of the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) meeting minutes, which provided no clear guidance on the future interest rate trajectory. The regulator emphasized that future decisions will depend on incoming data and the balance of risks, noting that without further tightening, inflation could remain above the 2-3% target range for longer. Markets are now awaiting Q4 wage data and the January labor market report to assess the outlook for inflation and RBA policy.

S&P 500 (US500) 6,836.17 0 (0%)

Dow Jones (US30) 49,500.93 0 (0%)

DAX (DE40) 24,800.91 −113.97 (−0.46%)

FTSE 100 (UK100) 10,473.69 +27.34 (+0.26%)

USD Index 97.07 +0.16% (+0.16%)

News feed for: 2026.02.17

  • Australia RBA Meeting Minutes at 02:30 (GMT+2); – AUD (MED)
  • German Inflation Rate (m/m) at 09:00 (GMT+2); – EUR (MED)
  • UK Claimant Count Change (m/m) at 09:00 (GMT+2); – GBP (HIGH)
  • UK Average Earnings Index (m/m) at 09:00 (GMT+2); – GBP (HIGH)
  • UK Unemployment Rate (m/m) at 09:00 (GMT+2); – GBP (HIGH)
  • Eurozone ZEW Economic Sentiment (m/m) at 12:00 (GMT+2); – EUR (MED)
  • Canada Consumer Price Index (m/m) at 15:30 (GMT+2); – CAD (HIGH)
  • New Zealand Producer Price Index (q/q) at 23:45 (GMT+2). – NZD (MED)

By JustMarkets

 

This article reflects a personal opinion and should not be interpreted as an investment advice, and/or offer, and/or a persistent request for carrying out financial transactions, and/or a guarantee, and/or a forecast of future events.

Silver fell by more than 10%. The Mexican peso reached its highest level since mid-2024

By JustMarkets 

On Thursday, the US stock market closed lower. The Dow Jones Index (US30) fell by 1.34%, the S&P 500 (US500) dropped by 1.57%, and the tech-heavy Nasdaq (US100) closed sharply lower by 2.03%. Early attempts at a rally quickly fizzled out amid ongoing pressure in the technology sector. Investors have become more skeptical regarding the scale and return on investment (ROI) of artificial intelligence infrastructure, triggering a sell-off in shares of major tech companies and software developers. Banks also faced pressure amid discussions regarding interest rates on credit products. The strong employment report released earlier in the week continued to weigh on expectations for an early Fed pivot, supporting bond yields and intensifying pressure on growth stocks. Meanwhile, defensive companies appeared more resilient than the broader market. Investors are now focused on upcoming inflation data, which may set the further direction for index dynamics.

The Mexican peso (MXN) strengthened beyond 17.15 per dollar, reaching its highest level since mid-2024, driven by declining US yields and capital inflows into emerging market assets. Even after recent cuts, the Banxico rate remains near 7%, providing one of the highest real yields and supporting demand for peso-denominated bonds, while the regulator maintains a cautious tone regarding further easing.

Bitcoin (BTC) dropped toward $66,000, surrendering most of its recent gains amid general pressure on the digital assets market. Sentiment soured following warnings from Standard Chartered about potential further declines and weak earnings from Coinbase, which recorded a quarterly loss of $667 million alongside a revenue drop of more than 20%. Since its October peak above $126,000, Bitcoin has lost over 45%, and recovery attempts remain fragile, indicating a slump in speculative demand. Analysts warn that consolidating below the $60,000-$58,000 zone could intensify the sell-off, with a potential move toward levels around $40,000.

European equity markets mostly declined yesterday. The German DAX (DE40) edged down by 0.01%, the French CAC 40 (FR40) closed up 0.33%, the Spanish IBEX 35 (ES35) fell by 0.82%, and the British FTSE 100 (UK100) closed down 0.67%. European stocks ended Thursday lower, tracking the sell-off in North American markets fueled by concerns over AI investment returns and the prospect of the Fed maintaining a restrictive policy.

Silver (XAG) collapsed by nearly 10% to below $76 per ounce, continuing a sharp reversal amid broad liquidation of positions across financial markets. Investors sold off precious metals to free up liquidity; the decline occurred even as US Treasury yields fell, suggesting market stress and position closures rather than a reassessment of rate expectations. The pressure also affected gold and copper, amplifying the general decline in the commodities segment.

Natural gas (XNG) prices in the US rose toward $3.23 per MMBtu, supported by active LNG exports and a significant reduction in inventories. For the week ending February 6, 249 billion cubic feet (bcf) were withdrawn from storage, following a record 360 bcf the previous week – substantially higher than both last year’s level and the five-year average. Deliveries to LNG export terminals remain near record highs. However, a prognosed warming through the end of February could reduce heating demand and limit the potential for further price increases.

Asian markets declined on Thursday. Japan’s Nikkei 225 (JP225) fell by 0.02%, the Chinese FTSE China A50 (CHA50) dropped 0.60%, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng (HK50) lost 0.86%, while the Australian ASX 200 (AU200) posted a positive result of 0.32%.

A quarterly survey by the Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ) showed an increase in inflation projections for Q1 2026. Businesses expect inflation at 2.37% over a two-year horizon (up from 2.28% previously), while one-year expectations rose to 2.59% – a seven-quarter high. At the same time, respondents await the Official Cash Rate (OCR) to remain unchanged at 2.25% by the end of March 2026. Previously, the regulator cut the rate by 25 bps to 2.25% in November 2025.
The Malaysian economy grew by 6.3% year-on-year in Q4 2025, exceeding the initial estimate of 5.7% and accelerating from 5.4% in the third quarter. This marks the highest growth rate since Q4 2022, indicating a steady recovery in domestic demand and the external sector toward the end of the year. On a quarterly basis, GDP increased by 0.8% following a stronger 2.7% growth in the previous quarter, suggesting some loss of momentum. For the full year 2025, the country’s economy expanded by 5.2%, maintaining a robust growth pace despite regional and global volatility.

S&P 500 (US500) 6,832.76 −108.71 (−1.57%)

Dow Jones (US30) 49,451.98 −669.42 (−1.34%)

DAX (DE40) 24,852.69 −3.46 (−0.014%)

FTSE 100 (UK100) 10,402.44 −69.67 (−0.67%)

USD Index 96.92 +0.08% (+0.08%)

News feed for: 2026.02.13

  • Switzerland Inflation Rate (m/m) at 09:30 (GMT+2); – CHF (HIGH)
  • Eurozone Employment Change (m/m) at 12:00 (GMT+2); – EUR (MED)
  • Eurozone GDP (m/m) at 12:00 (GMT+2); – EUR (MED)
  • Eurozone Trade Balance (m/m) at 12:00 (GMT+2); – EUR (MED)
  • US Consumer Price Index (m/m) at 15:30 (GMT+2). – USD (HIGH)

By JustMarkets

 

This article reflects a personal opinion and should not be interpreted as an investment advice, and/or offer, and/or a persistent request for carrying out financial transactions, and/or a guarantee, and/or a forecast of future events.

Strong employment data reduced expectations of imminent Fed easing

By JustMarkets

On Wednesday, the US stock market closed with a decline. The Dow Jones Index (US30) lost 0.13%, though it hit a new all-time high at the session opening. The S&P 500 (US500) edged down by 0.01%, and the tech-heavy Nasdaq (US100) closed 0.16% lower. Strong employment data (NFP growth of 130k and a decrease in unemployment) confirmed the resilience of the labor market and lowered expectations for an early easing of Fed policy. Non-Farm Payrolls rose by 130k due to private sector support, more than double the expectations, while the unemployment rate unexpectedly fell.

Stock markets in Europe mostly declined yesterday. The German DAX (DE40) dropped by 0.53%, the French CAC 40 (FR40) closed down 0.18%, and the Spanish IBEX 35 (ES35) fell 0.43%. Conversely, the British FTSE 100 (UK100) closed 1.14% higher. European indices ended Wednesday without a clear trend amid mixed corporate earnings reports. Siemens Energy surged 8.5% due to a nearly threefold increase in profit, and Ferrari rose by more than 4%.
Platinum prices (XPT) are holding just above $2,100 per ounce, remaining under pressure near annual lows. Weak demand for autocatalysts and rising US yields are offsetting the impact of mining restrictions in South Africa, while existing inventories and recycling mitigate deficit risks. Additional pressure comes from strong US labor market statistics and expectations of delayed Fed rate cuts, which support the dollar and reduce investment interest in precious metals.

WTI prices rose more than 1% to above $65 per barrel, approaching highs not seen since September amid intensifying tensions surrounding Iran. The market is reacting to reports of a possible tightening of the US stance, which could jeopardize oil supplies if negotiations fail. However, gains were limited by EIA data showing US crude inventories increased by 8.5 million barrels – the highest jump in a year. Investors are also awaiting reports from OPEC and the IEA, where signals of a possible supply surplus this year are expected.

Asian markets rose confidently on Wednesday. While Japan’s Nikkei 225 (JP225) did not trade, the Chinese FTSE China A50 (CHA50) fell by 0.22%, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng (HK50) gained 0.31%, and the Australian ASX 200 (AU200) posted a positive result of 1.66%.

On Thursday, the offshore yuan (CNH) strengthened beyond 6.89 per dollar, extending its winning streak to a sixth session and hitting its highest level since May 2023. The currency is supported by statements from Xi Jinping regarding the ambition to elevate the yuan’s global status as a reserve currency. Since the beginning of last year, the dollar has weakened against the yuan by approximately 6%. However, growth is limited by the People’s Bank of China’s “moderately dovish” stance and weak inflation data: in January, CPI slowed to 0.2%, and producer price deflation narrowed to 1.4% – a one-and-a-half-year low.

The Australian dollar (AUD) rose above $0.71, reaching a three-year high following hawkish signals from the RBA. Governor Michele Bullock stated a readiness for further rate hikes if inflation remains persistent, emphasizing that figures “starting with a three” are unacceptable. Inflation expectations rose to 5% in February, strengthening hawkish sentiment. The market is now pricing in the probability of a rate hike in May.

S&P 500 (US500) 6,941.47 −0.34 (−0.01%)

Dow Jones (US30) 50,121.40 −66.74 (−0.13%)

DAX (DE40) 24,856.15 −131.70 (−0.53%)

FTSE 100 (UK100) 10,472.11 +118.27 (+1.14%)

USD Index 96.92 +0.12% (+0.13%)

News feed for: 2026.02.12

  • Japan Producer Price Index (m/m) at 01:50 (GMT+2); – JPY (MED)
  • UK GDP (q/q) at 09:00 (GMT+2); – GBP (MED)
  • UK Industrial Production (m/m) at 09:00 (GMT+2); – GBP (MED)
  • UK Trade Balance (m/m) at 09:00 (GMT+2); – GBP (MED)
  • US Initial Jobless Claims (w/w) at 15:30 (GMT+2); – USD (MED)
  • US Existing Home Sales (m/m) at 17:00 (GMT+2); – USD (MED)
  • US Natural Gas Storage (w/w) at 17:30 (GMT+2). – XNG (HIGH)

By JustMarkets

 

This article reflects a personal opinion and should not be interpreted as an investment advice, and/or offer, and/or a persistent request for carrying out financial transactions, and/or a guarantee, and/or a forecast of future events.

The rise of ‘Merzoni’: How an alliance between Germany’s and Italy’s leaders is reshaping Europe

By Julia Khrebtan-Hörhager, Colorado State University 

“Merzoni” isn’t a neologism that easily trips off the tongue, and it hasn’t fully taken hold in the world of European politics.

Yet, for months, a pragmatic alliance between German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has been building.

And despite the politicians being, in many ways, unlikely partners, the union has quietly been redefining Europe’s power balance. In the latest display of this dynamic, a joint-policy paper drawn up by Merz and Meloni is set to be delivered to European Union partners at an informal summit on Feb. 12, 2026, urging reforms to improve the bloc’s competitiveness.

As a scholar of European politics, history and culture, I see the union as being born of necessity but nonetheless serving the interests of both parties – and possibly those of the European Union, too.

Moving on from ‘Merkron’

Post-war European politics has seen the center of its gravity move before, but it has largely revolved around shifts to and from France or Germany, the bloc’s current two largest economies. The U.K.’s ability to dominate EU politics was always stymied by its lateness to the “European project” and ambivalence at home. And it was ended outright by a referendum in 2016 that saw the U.K.’s exit from the union.

For nearly a decade after Britain’s exit, Europe revolved around the axis of Germany’s Angela Merkel and France’s Emmanuel Macron, an alliance given the nickname “Merkron”: Merkel’s clumsy charm and cautious pragmatism paired with Macron’s charisma and sweeping European idealism. Their dual-stewardship helped steer the EU through Brexit, Donald Trump’s first presidency and the pandemic.

But times have changed.

Merkel is gone. She stepped down as German chancellor in December 2021. Macron, meanwhile, has struggled politically at home and increasingly resembles what diplomats and journalists describe as a European “Cassandra”: right in his warnings about global instability, yet less able to mobilize support domestically or across the continent to confront the issues.

The end of the “Merkron” era coincided with myriad crises confronting Europe, including Russia’s ongoing war in Ukraine, current U.S. unpredictability, growing climate pressures, never-stopping migration tensions and the collapse of arms-control regimes.

The comforting post-Cold War assumption that peace in Europe was permanent has vanished.

An unlikely partnership

Into this vacuum stepped Merz and Meloni. At first glance, the pairing looks odd.

Merz is a conservative Atlanticist and unapologetic economic liberal. His message, and the title of his 2008 book, “Dare More Capitalism,” signals a move toward an assertive pro-market agenda after years of cautious centrism under Merkel. Merz insists Germany must rebuild military capacity – a departure from decades of both German domestic and EU-wide reticence toward such a move.

Meloni, meanwhile, rose to power from Italy’s nationalist right. The lineage of her home party, Fratelli d’Italia, or Brothers of Italy, traces back to the rump of Mussolini’s fascists. Yet in office, she has proved politically agile, repositioning herself as a responsible and quite successful European actor. Meloni as prime minister has maintained support for Ukraine and cooperation with the European Union – shrugging off concerns over both areas prior to her coming to power. She has equally skillfully cultivated strong ties with Washington – including Trump’s political camp, and overall has demonstrated successful strategic chameleonism.

Critics call her opportunistic; admirers call her pragmatic. Either way, Meloni has mastered political shape-shifting, becoming a bridge between nationalist and mainstream Europe.

What unites Merz and Meloni is less ideology than necessity.

Germany remains Europe’s economic engine but needs partners to push Europe toward greater defense capacity and economic competitiveness. Italy is seeking greater influence and credibility at Europe’s core.

Both governments now speak the language of strategic autonomy: Europe must be able to defend itself and protect its interests even if the U.S. becomes unreliable. As the joint-paper reportedly being presented to other EU partners puts it: “Continuing on the current path is not an option. Europe must act now.”

Europe unites against a frenemy

Ironically, Europe’s unity has often emerged in response to crisis.

Brexit strengthened pro-EU sentiment on the mainland. Similarly, Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine revived NATO and EU cooperation.

Now, Trump – with his flirtation with abandoning NATO commitments, threatening tariffs and questioning of territorial arrangements in places like Greenland – has delivered a shock to European political consciousness.

Recent surveys show overwhelming European support for stronger EU defense cooperation and greater unity against global threats.

For leaders like Merz and Meloni, this creates political space for policies that would have seemed unthinkable, or certainly more difficult, a decade ago, such as military buildups, defense integration, industrial protection and tougher migration policies.

Defense and militarization

The most dramatic change is, arguably, happening in Germany. For decades, Berlin avoided military leadership, haunted by its history and sheltered under U.S. security guarantees. That era is ending. German officials increasingly speak about rearmament, European defense readiness and long-term strategic competition.

The timing could not be more urgent. Merz, framing Moscow’s ongoing aggression as a direct assault on European security and unity, stated in September 2025 that “we are not at war, but we are no longer at peace either.”

The new German-Italian action plan explicitly strengthens cooperation on defense, cybersecurity and strategic industries. Both governments stress NATO loyalty while simultaneously pushing for stronger European military capacity.

The idea of a future European defense force, once dismissed as fantasy, now circulates seriously in policy circles. Rome is reportedly planning a major procurement deal with German arms manufacturer Rheinmetall worth up to US$24 billion (20 billion euros). Including hundreds of armored vehicles and new-generation tanks, it would represent one of Europe’s largest joint defense projects.

The move reflects a shared push by Berlin and Rome to strengthen Europe’s military capacity while anchoring rearmament in European industrial partnerships.

What’s in it for Meloni and Merz?

For Meloni, partnership with Berlin delivers legitimacy. Italy has traditionally oscillated between European leadership and peripheral frustration. By aligning with Germany, Rome reenters Europe’s decision-making core.

At the same time, Meloni can present herself as both nationalist at home and indispensable to Europe. Her political positions allow her to maintain channels with Washington while remaining inside EU consensus – a balancing act few European leaders can manage.

Germany, meanwhile, gains political flexibility and a partner more aligned with big-picture EU politics.

Macron’s ambitious federalist vision has at times alienated more cautious partners in the bloc. Italy offers a pragmatic counterweight for Merz, focused on competitiveness, migration control and industrial policy rather than a grand European redesign.

Macron isn’t being entirely squeezed out. France still leads on nuclear deterrence and many diplomatic initiatives. Yet political momentum is shifting and now lies with governments willing to prioritize economic competitiveness and security over institutional reform.

Will it work?

The Merzoni partnership faces major tests.

Italy’s economy remains fragile, and Germany’s export model struggles amid global economic shifts. Far-right and populist movements still challenge EU cohesion. And defense integration remains politically sensitive across member nations.

Yet necessity often drives European integration. And as crises accumulate, cooperation becomes less optional.

The real question is whether Europe can move from reactive crisis management to having a proactive geopolitical strategy. For now, the unlikely German-Italian partnership suggests Europe’s political map is being redrawn – not through grand federal visions but through pragmatic alliances shaped by fear, necessity and opportunity.The Conversation

About the Author:

Julia Khrebtan-Hörhager, Associate Professor of Critical Cultural & International Studies, Colorado State University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

 

Has globalization lessened the importance of physical distance? For economic shocks, new research suggests ‘yes’

By Josh Ederington, Miami University and Jenny Minier, Miami University 

National economies are increasingly moving in sync and responding to the same booms and busts as a result of near-instantaneous communications and interdependent global supply chains. This is a sharp change from much of the 21st century, when economies were primarily affected by economic shocks in neighboring countries.

That’s what we found in a paper published in the journal Economic Letters, in which we calculated measures of economic correlation using data on gross domestic product for 70 countries over the past 60 years. Along with fellow economic scholars Yoonseon Han and David Lindequist, we found that physical distance was indeed less important than it used to be, particularly with regard to how interconnected countries are to one another.

Specifically, we measured the extent to which countries have found their business cycles — the traditional boom-bust intervals of economic performance — in sync. For example, when there is a positive shock to production in Germany, to what extent does this affect incomes in the United States?

We were interested in whether the relationship between distance and economic correlation has changed over time.

What we found was that from 1960-1999, business cycles were strongly localized. That is, a country’s economy was much more likely to be impacted by shocks to nearby countries than by shocks in faraway countries. For example, the U.S. was more affected by economic conditions in Canada or Mexico than it was to economic conditions in the United Kingdom or South Korea.

This finding is not surprising and fits well with a long economic literature showing that countries are more likely to trade with nearby countries and that the volume of trade between two countries is a significant predictor of how synchronized their business cycles are.

However, we went on to find that this relationship between physical distance and economic correlation started to break down after 2000. Specifically, for the past 20 years, there has been no statistically significant relationship between the geographic distance between two countries and the extent to which incomes in the two countries move together — what economists refer to as their economic covariance.

Why it matters

In the late 1990s and early 2000s, a number of economists, including Frances Cairncross and Thomas Friedman, popularized the idea that new technologies like the internet and containerization had led to the death of distance, in which our new lives would be increasingly globalized. They imagined a future in which these new technologies not only impacted how goods were produced — like global supply chains — but also how we work and live.

Such theories were met with some skepticism by trade researchers at the time, and not all of the predictions have come true. For example, the link between distance and trade flows has proved stubbornly persistent. Even today, the top-two trading partners of the U.S. remain Canada and Mexico. And one only has to look at housing prices in major urban centers in the U.S. to see that physical location remains highly valued to most people.

However, our research suggests that at least some of the popular predictions about the globalized economy might be coming true. For instance, the world economy appears to have made countries increasingly susceptible to global, as opposed to localized, shocks.

This was made devastatingly clear to millions of people during the pandemic, when supply chain bottlenecks reverberated across the globe, subsequently generating a worldwide rise in prices. As a result, U.S. economic and trade policy discussions have been increasingly focused on potential vulnerabilities to foreign shocks. Indeed, a new buzzword during the Biden administration was “supply chain resiliance.”

What still isn’t known

Our work provides evidence that business cycles and economic shocks have become more globalized over the past couple of decades. Many of the main economic events from 1960-2000 – like the 1980s savings and loan crisis or the 1997 Asian currency crisis – had primarily localized effects. But more recently, the principal economic events of the past two decades — like the 2008 financial crisis — have had far more global implications.

What we don’t know is whether this pattern will continue, resulting in a new era in which most of the world’s economies move in tandem. Or will a new turn toward economic nationalism lead to a reversal in which economies – and economic shocks – become more localized once again?

The Research Brief is a short take on interesting academic work.The Conversation

About the Author:

Josh Ederington, Professor of Economics, Miami University and Jenny Minier, Julian Lange Professor of Economics, Miami University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

 

Chinese stocks show growth ahead of the holiday week

By JustMarkets 

On Tuesday, trading on the US stock market closed with mixed performance. The Dow Jones Index (US30) gained 0.10%. The S&P 500 (US500) declined by 0.33%. The tech-heavy Nasdaq (US100) closed lower by 0.59%. The market was pressured by weak US retail sales data for December (0% against projections of +0.4%), which intensified concerns regarding consumer demand and supported expectations of more than two Fed rate cuts this year. Bond yields decreased across the curve. A positive outlier was Spotify, whose shares soared 14.8% due to strong earnings and audience growth.

Stock markets in Europe mostly declined yesterday. The German DAX (DE40) fell by 0.11%, the French CAC 40 (FR40) closed up 0.06%, the Spanish IBEX 35 (ES35) dropped 0.40%, and the British FTSE 100 (UK100) closed down 0.31%. Investors remained cautious ahead of key US employment and inflation data, which may clarify the Fed’s next steps. The focus also remained on the corporate earnings season.

On Wednesday, silver (XAG) rose nearly 2% to $82 per ounce, recovering previous session losses amid weak US data and declining confidence in American assets. Retail sales in December unexpectedly slowed, fueling fears for consumer demand. Attention is now focused on the jobs report; weak data could further support precious metals. Markets are already pricing in about 60 bps of Fed rate cuts by the end of the year. Additional demand for safe-haven assets is linked to outflows from dollar instruments amid political uncertainty in the US. However, market participants remain cautious due to recent high volatility and sharp fluctuations in metal prices.

The US natural gas prices (XNG) rose to $3.17 per MMBtu, snapping a two-day decline amid near-record LNG exports. Deliveries to the eight largest terminals in February reached 18.5 billion cubic feet per day, limiting domestic supply. Previously, Arctic cold led to a record reduction in inventories, which are currently about 1% below normal.

Asian markets grew confidently on Tuesday. The Japanese Nikkei 225 (JP225) jumped 2.28%, the FTSE China A50 (CHA50) rose by 0.02%, the Hong Kong Hang Seng (HK50) gained 0.58%, while the Australian ASX 200 (AU200) showed a negative result of 0.03%.

Chinese stocks ended the session higher amid expectations of high consumer demand during the Lunar New Year period. Additional optimism was sparked by reports of a possible meeting between Donald Trump and Xi Jinping in April. On Wednesday, the offshore yuan held around 6.91 per dollar, near highs since April 2023, amid steady daily fixing by the PBoC. The Central Bank set the midpoint rate at 6.9438, signaling a desire for stable and moderate currency appreciation despite softer policy rhetoric. However, the yuan’s rise is capped by the confirmation of a “moderately easy” monetary policy stance. January inflation slowed to 0.2% YoY from 0.8%, while producer price deflation narrowed to 1.4% thanks to stabilizing commodity prices and measures to limit excessive competition.

The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) stated its readiness for further measures to curb inflation, which, according to RBA Deputy Governor Andrew Hauser, remains “too high.” The regulator intends to “do whatever is necessary” to return inflation to the 2-3% target range. Last week, the RBA raised the rate by 25 bps, reversing a previous cut after inflation again exceeded projections. Both headline and core inflation remain above the target, and a return to the target level is not expected until mid-2027.

S&P 500 (US500) 6,941.81 −23.01 (−0.33%)

Dow Jones (US30) 50,188.14 +52.27 (+0.10%)

DAX (DE40) 24,987.85 −27.02 (−0.11%)

FTSE 100 (UK100) 10,353.84 −32.39 (−0.31%)

USD Index 96.85 +0.04% (+0.04%)

News feed for: 2026.02.11

  • China Inflation Rate (m/m) at 03:30 (GMT+2); – CHA50, HK50 (MED)
  • US Non Farm Payrolls (m/m) at 15:30 (GMT+2); – USD, XAU (HIGH)
  • US Unemployment Rate (m/m) at 15:30 (GMT+2); – USD, XAU (HIGH)
  • US Crude Oil Reserves (w/w) at 17:30 (GMT+2). – WTI (HIGH)

By JustMarkets

 

This article reflects a personal opinion and should not be interpreted as an investment advice, and/or offer, and/or a persistent request for carrying out financial transactions, and/or a guarantee, and/or a forecast of future events.

The Swiss franc is trading near a 15-year high against the dollar. The Chinese yuan strengthened to 6.9 per dollar

By JustMarkets 

On Monday, trading on the US stock market closed higher. The Dow Jones Index (US30) gained 0.04%. The S&P 500 Index (US500) rose by 0.47%. The Nasdaq Technology Index (US100) closed higher by 0.90%. The market was primarily supported by shares of large technology companies and AI-related issuers, which offset investor caution ahead of the publication of key US macroeconomic data. The growth leaders were Nvidia (+2.5%), Broadcom (+3.4%), and Oracle (+9.6%) following analyst upgrades amid steady demand for AI infrastructure. At the same time, software developers lagged, reflecting concerns regarding generative AI’s pressure on margins and the outlook for the cloud business. Market focus is shifting to the delayed employment report and upcoming US inflation data.

The Canadian dollar (CAD) strengthened to 1.356 per USD, approaching a 16-month high, amid strong labor market data and rising commodity prices. In January, unemployment fell to 6.5%, the lowest since September 2024, while growth in full-time employment and wages weakened expectations for an early policy easing by the Bank of Canada and supported foreign capital inflows. The CAD received additional support from the general weakening of the US dollar following weak US labor data and rising oil prices, which improved Canada’s terms of trade.

The Mexican peso (MXN) strengthened to 17.20 per dollar, hitting a new high since mid-2024 amid USD weakening and the market’s reaction to January inflation data. Banxico’s decision to maintain the rate at 7% and its emphasis on inflationary risks reduced expectations of rapid policy easing, supporting the peso’s real yield. Inflation in January accelerated to 3.79% y/y, slightly missing projections, with moderate monthly price growth, allowing the regulator to maintain a cautious approach.

Equity markets in Europe mostly rose yesterday. The German DAX (DE40) rose by 1.19%, the French CAC 40 (FR40) closed up 0.60%, the Spanish IBEX 35 (ES35) gained 1.40%, and the British FTSE 100 (UK100) closed positive 0.16%. European stock indices closed with sharp gains on Monday, supported by banks, industrial giants, and the technology sector amid a series of positive corporate news and a steady view of relatively favorable macroeconomic conditions for equities this year.

The Swiss franc (CHF) strengthened to 0.770 per dollar, approaching its highest levels since 2011 amid demand for safe-haven assets and USD weakness. Investors remain cautious due to risks surrounding AI and recommendations from Chinese regulators to reduce holdings in US Treasuries, which is intensifying capital outflows from the dollar. The market focus this week is on Swiss inflation data for January (February 13), where prices are expected to rise by only 0.1% y/y. SNB Chairman Martin Schlegel noted the challenges of low inflation with a 0% rate, emphasizing the bank’s readiness to intervene in the currency market if necessary, rather than rushing to cut rates, maintaining a course toward price stability.

On Tuesday, WTI oil prices declined toward $64.2 per barrel but retained most of the gains recorded on Monday amid ongoing geopolitical tensions between the US and Iran. Prices were supported by Washington’s warning to US-flagged vessels to avoid Iranian waters when passing through the Strait of Hormuz, despite reports of progress in negotiations held in Oman. At the same time, uncertainty surrounding a possible agreement persists as Iran continues to insist on uranium enrichment. An additional risk factor for the market remains the situation with Indian imports of Russian oil: a possible freeze on purchases as part of a new trade agreement with the US could significantly support oil quotes.

Asian markets rose confidently on Monday. The Japanese Nikkei 225 (JP225) jumped 3.89% after the weekend elections, the Chinese FTSE China A50 (CHA50) rose by 1.24%, the Hong Kong Hang Seng (HK50) gained 1.76%, and the Australian ASX 200 (AU200) showed a positive result of 1.85%. Sentiment in Asia improved after Japan’s ruling party won a convincing election victory, but investors are still grappling with an uncertain economic outlook and concerns over the impact of artificial intelligence on various sectors.
On Tuesday, the offshore yuan (CNH) strengthened to 6.9 per dollar, approaching a 34-month high following reports that Chinese regulators recommended banks reduce excessive exposure to US Treasuries. The measure is aimed at reducing concentration risks amid uncertain US economic policy and has strengthened expectations of a broader global shift away from dollar assets, as well as a gradual structural shift in China’s currency strategy. The yuan received additional support from increased corporate demand ahead of the Lunar New Year, when companies traditionally convert dollars for payroll, supplier settlements, and bonuses.

S&P 500 (US500) 6,964.82 +32.52 (+0.47%)

Dow Jones (US30) 50,135.87 +20.20 (+0.04%)

DAX (DE40) 25,014.87 +293.41 (+1.19%)

FTSE 100 (UK100) 10,386.23 +16.48 (+0.16%)

USD Index 96.86 −0.77% (−0.79%)

News feed for: 2026.02.10

  • Australia NAB Business Confidence (m/m) at 02:30 (GMT+2); – AUD (MED)
  • Norway Inflation Rate (m/m) at 09:00 (GMT+2); – NOK (MED)
  • US Retail Sales (m/m) at 15:30 (GMT+2). – USD (MED)

By JustMarkets

 

This article reflects a personal opinion and should not be interpreted as an investment advice, and/or offer, and/or a persistent request for carrying out financial transactions, and/or a guarantee, and/or a forecast of future events.

Why corporate America is mostly staying quiet as federal immigration agents show up at its doors

By Alessandro Piazza, Rice University 

When U.S. Border Patrol agents entered a Target store in Richfield, Minnesota, in early January, detaining two employees, it marked a new chapter in the relationship between corporate America and the federal government.

Across the Twin Cities, federal immigration enforcement operations have turned businesses into sites of confrontation — with agents in store parking lots rounding up day laborers, armed raids on restaurants and work authorization inspections conducted in tactical gear.

Some retailers report revenue drops of 50% to 80% as customers stay home out of fear. Along Lake Street and in East St. Paul, areas within the Twin Cities, an estimated 80% of businesses have closed their doors at some point since the operations began.

Then came the killing of U.S. citizens Renee Good and Alex Pretti, the latter of which came a day after widespread protests and a one-day business blackout involving over 700 establishments.

The response of corporate America to those killings was instructive — both for what was said and left unsaid. After the Pretti killing, more than 60 CEOs from Minnesota’s largest companies — Target, 3M, UnitedHealth Group, U.S. Bancorp, General Mills, Best Buy and others — signed a public letter organized by the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce. The letter called for “peace,” “focused cooperation” among local, state and federal officials, and a “swift and durable solution” so that families, workers and businesses could return to normal.

What it didn’t do was name Pretti, mention federal immigration enforcement or criticize any specific policy or official. It read less like moral leadership and more like corporate risk management.

As a researcher who studies corporate political engagement, I think the Minnesota CEO letter is a window into a broader shift. For years, companies could take progressive stances with limited risk — activists would punish them if they remained silent on an issue, but conservatives rarely retaliated when they spoke up. That asymmetry has collapsed. Minneapolis shows what corporate activism looks like when the risks cut both ways: hedged language, no names named and calls for calm.

A shifting pattern

In 2022, after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, corporate America was remarkably quiet compared with its vocal stances on LGBTQ+ rights or the war in Ukraine.

The explanation: Companies tend to hedge on issues that are contested and polarizing. In my research with colleagues on companies taking stances on LGBTQ+ rights in the United States, I’ve found that businesses frame their stances narrowly when issues are unsettled — focusing on workplace concerns and internal constituencies like employees rather than broader advocacy. Only after issues are legally or socially settled do some companies shift to clearer activism, adopting the language of social movements: injustice, moral obligation, calls to action.

By that logic, the Minnesota CEOs’ caution makes sense. The Trump administration’s federal immigration enforcement policy is deeply contested. There’s no clear legal or social settlement in sight.

But something else has changed since 2022 — something that goes beyond any particular issue.

For years, corporate activism operated under a favorable asymmetry that allowed them to stake out public positions on controversial topics without much negative consequence.

That is, activists and employees pressured companies to speak out on progressive causes, and silence carried real costs. Meanwhile, conservatives largely subscribed to free-market economist Milton Friedman’s view that the only social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. They generally didn’t demand corporate stances on their issues, and they didn’t organize sustained punishment for progressive corporate speech.

That asymmetry has collapsed

During the Black Lives Matter protests of 2020, corporations rushed to declare their commitments to racial justice, diversity and social responsibility. Many of those same companies have since quietly dismantled diversity, equity and inclusion programs, walked back public commitments and gone silent on issues they once called moral imperatives. It appears that their allegedly deeply held values were contingent on a favorable political environment. When the risks shifted, the values evaporated.

The turning point may have been Disney’s opposition to Florida’s “Don’t Say Gay” law in 2022. The company faced criticism from employees and activists for not doing enough – and then fierce retaliation from Florida’s government, which stripped Disney of self-governing privileges it had held for 55 years.

In other high-profile examples, Delta lost tax breaks in Georgia after ending discounts for National Rifle Association members following the Parkland shooting. And Bud Light lost billions in market value after a single social media promotion that featured Dylan Mulvaney, a transgender influencer.

Conservatives learned to play the game that progressive activists invented. And unlike consumer boycotts, government retaliation carries a different kind of weight.

Minneapolis reveals the new calculus

What makes Minneapolis distinctive is that the federal government isn’t a distant policy actor debating legislation in Washington. It’s a physical presence in companies’ daily operations. When federal agents can show up at your store, detain your employees, raid your parking lot and audit your hiring records, the calculation about whether to criticize federal policy looks very different than when the worst-case scenario is an angry tweet from a politician.

Research finds that politicians are less willing to engage with CEOs who take controversial stances – even in private meetings – regardless of local economic conditions or the politicians’ own views on business. The chilling effect is real. As one observer noted, Minnesota companies communicated through industry associations specifically “to avoid direct exposure to possible retaliation.”

“De-escalation,” then, has become the corporate buzzword of choice because, as one news report in The Wall Street Journal noted, it “sounds humane while remaining politically noncommittal.” It points to a process goal – reduce conflict, restore order – rather than a contested diagnosis of responsibility.

This is the triple bind facing businesses in Minneapolis: pressure from the federal government on one side, pressure from activists and employees on the other, and the economic devastation from enforcement itself — comparable in some areas to the COVID-19 pandemic — crushing them in the middle. It’s a situation that rewards silence and punishes principle, and most companies are making the predictable choice.

And yet the situation within companies is also full of internal tensions, whether they’re companies headquartered in Minnesota or not. At tech company Palantir, which holds contracts with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, employees took to internal Slack channels after Pretti’s death to express that they felt “not proud” to work for a company tied to what they described as “the bad guys.” Similar sentiments could be seen at elsewhere, where rank-and-file employees expressed far more vocal outrage than their bosses.

What comes next

The Minnesota CEO letter is what corporate political engagement looks like when the risks run in every direction: no injustice framing, no attribution of blame, no names named — just calls for stability and cooperation.

As a local Minneapolis writer put it in an op-ed: “Stand up, or sit down … because the Minnesotans who are standing up? We don’t recognize you.”

It’s not cowardice, exactly. It’s what the research predicts when an issue is contested and the costs of speaking cut both ways.

But it does mean Americans shouldn’t expect corporations to lead when government power is directly at stake. The conditions that enabled corporate activism on LGBTQ+ rights — an asymmetry where speaking out was relatively low-risk — don’t exist here.

Until the political landscape shifts, the hedged statement and the cautious coalition letter are the new normal. Corporate activism, it turns out, might always have been more about positioning than principle.The Conversation

About the Author:

Alessandro Piazza, Assistant Professor of Strategic Management, Rice University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.