Archive for Economics & Fundamentals – Page 4

Americans face an insurability crisis as climate change worsens disasters – a look at how insurance companies set rates and coverage

By Andrew J. Hoffman, University of Michigan 

Home insurance rates are rising in the United States, not only in Florida, which saw tens of billions of dollars in losses from hurricanes Helene and Milton, but across the country.

According to S&P Global Market Intelligence, homeowners insurance increased an average of 11.3% nationwide in 2023, with some states, including Texas, Arizona and Utah, seeing nearly double that increase. Some analysts predict an average increase of about 6% in 2024.

These increases are driven by a potent mix of rising insurance payouts coupled with rising costs of construction as people build increasingly expensive homes and other assets in harm’s way.

When home insurance averages $2,377 a year nationally, and $11,000 per year in Florida, this is a blow to many people. Despite these rising rates, Jacques de Vaucleroy, chairman of the board of reinsurance giant Swiss Re, believes U.S. insurance is still priced too low to fully cover the risks.

It isn’t just that premiums are changing. Insurers now often reduce coverage limits, cap payouts, increase deductibles and impose new conditions or even exclusions on some common perils, such as protection for wind, hail or water damage. Some require certain preventive measures or apply risk-based pricing – charging more for homes in flood plains, wildfire-prone zones, or coastal areas at risk of hurricanes.

Homeowners watching their prices rise faster than inflation might think something sinister is at play. Insurance companies are facing rapidly evolving risks, however, and trying to price their policies low enough to remain competitive but high enough to cover future payouts and remain solvent in a stormier climate. This is not an easy task. In 2021 and 2022, seven property insurers filed for bankruptcy in Florida alone. In 2023, insurers lost money on homeowners coverage in 18 states.

But these changes are raising alarm bells. Some industry insiders worry that insurance may be losing its relevance and value – real or perceived – for policyholders as coverage shrinks, premiums rise and exclusions increase.

How insurers assess risk

Insurance companies use complex models to estimate the likelihood of current risks based on past events. They aggregate historical data – such as event frequency, scale, losses and contributing factors – to calculate price and coverage.

However, the increase in disasters makes the past an unreliable measure. What was once considered a 100-year event may now be better understood as a 30- or 50-year event in some locations.

What many people do not realize is that the rise of so-called “secondary perils” – an insurance industry term for floods, hailstorms, strong winds, lightning strikes, tornadoes and wildfires that generate small to mid-size damage – is becoming the main driver of the insurability challenge, particularly as these events become more intense, frequent and cumulative, eroding insurers’ profitability over time.

Climate change plays a role in these rising risks. As the climate warms, air can hold more moisture – about 7% more with every degree Celsius of warming. That leads to stronger downpours, more thunderstorms, larger hail events and a higher risk of flooding in some regions. The U.S. was on average 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.6 degrees Fahrenheit) warmer in 2022 than in 1970.

Insurance companies are revising their models to keep up with these changes, much as they did when smoking-related illnesses became a significant cost burden in life and health insurance. Some companies use climate modeling to augment their standard actuarial risk modeling. But some states have been hesitant to allow climate modeling, which can leave companies systematically underrepresenting the risks they face.

Each company develops its own assessment and geographic strategy to reach a different conclusion. For example, Progressive Insurance has raised its homeowner rates by 55% between 2018 and 2023, while State Farm has raised them only 13.7%.

While a homeowner who chooses to make home improvements, such as installing a luxury kitchen, can expect an increase in premiums to account for the added replacement value, this effect is typically small and predictable. Generally, the more substantial premium hikes are due to the ever-increasing risk of severe weather and natural disasters.

Insurance for insurers

When risks become too unpredictable or volatile, insurers can turn to reinsurance for help.

Reinsurance companies are essentially insurance companies that insure insurance companies. But in recent years, reinsurers have recognized that their risk models are also no longer accurate and have raised their rates accordingly. Property reinsurance alone increased by 35% in 2023.

Reinsurance is also not very well suited to covering secondary perils. The traditional reinsurance model is focused on large, rare catastrophes, such as devastating hurricanes and earthquakes.

Two maps show highest costs on the coasts and in the West and Northeast.
Maps illustrate the average loss from flooding alone and expected increases by mid-century. About 90% of catastrophes in the U.S. involve flooding, but just 6% of U.S. homeowners have flood insurance.
Fifth National Climate Assessment

As an alternative, some insurers are moving toward parametric insurance, which provides a predefined payment if an event meets or exceeds a predefined intensity threshold. These policies are less expensive for consumers because the payouts are capped and cover events such as a magnitude 7 earthquake, excessive rain within a 24-hour period or a Category 3 hurricane in a defined geographical area. The limits allow insurers to provide a less expensive form of insurance that is less likely to severely disrupt their finances.

Protecting the consumer

Of course, insurers don’t operate in an entirely free market. State insurance regulators evaluate insurance companies’ proposals to raise rates and either approve or deny them.

The insurance industry in North Carolina, for example, where Hurricane Helene caused catastrophic damage, is arguing for a homeowner premium increase of more than 42% on average, ranging from 4% in parts of the mountains to 99% in some waterfront areas.

If a rate increase is denied, it could force an insurer to simply withdraw from certain market sectors, cancel existing policies or refuse to write new ones when their “loss ratio” – the ratio of claims paid to premiums collected – becomes too high for too long.

Since 2022, seven of the top 12 insurance carriers have either cut existing homeowners policies or stopped selling new ones in the wildfire-prone California homeowner market, and an equal number have pulled back from the Florida market due to the increasing cost of hurricanes.

To stem this tide, California is reforming its regulations to speed up the rate increase approval process and allow insurers to make their case using climate models to judge wildfire risk more accurately.

Florida has instituted regulatory reforms that have reduced litigation and associated costs and has removed 400,000 policies from the state-run insurance program. As a result, eight insurance carriers have entered the market there since 2022.

Looking ahead

Solutions to the mounting insurance crisis also involve how and where people build. Building codes can require more resilient homes, akin to how fire safety standards increased the effectiveness of insurance many decades ago.

By one estimate, investing $3.5 billion in making the two-thirds of U.S. homes not currently up to code more resilient to storms could save insurers as much as $37 billion by 2030.

In the end, if affordability and relevance of insurance continue to degrade, real estate prices will start to decline in exposed locations. This will be the most tangible sign that climate change is driving an insurability crisis that disrupts wider financial stability.

About the Authors:

Justin D’Atri, Climate Coach at the education platform Adaptify U and Sustainability Transformation Lead at Zurich Insurance Group, contributed to this article.The Conversation

Andrew J. Hoffman, Holcim (US) Professor of Sustainable Enterprise, Ross School of Business, School for Environment & Sustainability, University of Michigan

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

 

RBNZ may cut the rate by 0.75% next week. NVDA report did not meet investors’ expectations

By JustMarkets

At Wednesday’s end, the Dow Jones Index (US30) rose by 0.32%. The S&P 500 Index (US500) closed at the opening price. The Nasdaq Technology Index (US100) declined 0.08%.

Nvidia (NVDA) reported fiscal third-quarter results that beat Wall Street estimates, but its plans for the current quarter fell short of investors’ inflated expectations amid hot demand for artificial intelligence. NVIDIA Corporation shares fell more than 2% in after-hours trading following the report. Qualcomm (QCOM) closed down more than 6%, leading to a decline in chip stocks after Susquehanna Financial cut its price target on the company’s shares to $210 from $230. Additionally, shares of Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) and Texas Instruments (TXN) were down more than 1%.

Of the 90% of S&P 500 companies that posted Q3 earnings, 75% beat estimates, slightly below the 3-year average. According to Bloomberg Intelligence, S&P 500 companies reported an average 8.5% year-over-year increase in Q3 quarterly earnings, more than double estimates.

Equity markets in Europe ended trading yesterday on a weak note. The German DAX (DE40) fell by 0.29%, the French CAC 40 (FR40) closed down 0.43%, the Spanish IBEX 35 (ES35) rose by 0.01%, the British FTSE 100 (UK100) closed down 0.17%. Investors sold risk assets following reports that Ukraine fired UK-made Storm Shadow missiles at Russian territory for the first time since the war began in 2022. This followed the firing of US-made ATACMS missiles the same morning Russia expanded the scenario, justifying the use of nuclear weapons and raising fears of a wider conflict with possible NATO involvement. However, by the end of the day, geopolitical tensions in Europe had eased after Reuters reported that Russian President Putin was willing to discuss a ceasefire agreement in Ukraine with US President-elect Trump, which could roughly freeze the war on current front lines.

The US crude inventories rose by 545,000 barrels last week, exceeding market projections. Oil markets have come under pressure in recent months amid concerns about a possible oil glut next year due to slowing demand growth in China and record-high production levels, even as OPEC+ maintains current production levels.

The US natural gas (XNG/USD) prices rose more than 6% to nearly $3.2/MMBtu, the highest since June 11, as colder weather in late November is expected to boost heating demand.

Asian markets were flat yesterday. Japan’s Nikkei 225 (JP225) fell by 0.16%, China’s FTSE China A50 (CHA50) rose by 0.13%, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng (HK50) gained 0.21%, and Australia’s ASX 200 (AU200) was negative 0.57%.

On Thursday, the New Zealand Treasury said it is likely to revise its economic and fiscal estimates downward due to a prolonged slowdown in labor productivity growth. This has prompted investors to increasingly consider the possibility that the Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ) will cut its 4.75% cash rate by 75bps more aggressively at its meeting next week, with a 50bps cut already fully priced in.

China’s Central Bank left key lending rates unchanged this week as expected, but investors remain hopeful that Beijing will introduce additional stimulus measures to support economic growth. Meanwhile, the prospect of higher tariffs on Chinese goods under the upcoming Trump administration adds to concerns about the country’s economic outlook.

S&P 500 (US500) 5,917.11 +0.13 (+0.0022%)

Dow Jones (US30) 43,408.47 +139.53 (+0.32%)

DAX (DE40) 19,004.78 −55.53 (−0.29%)

FTSE 100 (UK100) 8,085.07 −13.95 (−0.17%)

USD Index 106.67 −0.47 (−0.44%)

News feed for: 2024.11.21

  • Japan BOJ Gov Ueda Speaks at 07:10 (GMT+2);
  • Australia RBA Bullock Speech at 10:00 (GMT+2);
  • US Initial Jobless Claims (w/w) at 15:30 (GMT+2);
  • US Existing Home Sales (m/m) at 17:00 (GMT+2);
  • US Natural Gas Storage (w/w) at 17:30 (GMT+2).

By JustMarkets

 

This article reflects a personal opinion and should not be interpreted as an investment advice, and/or offer, and/or a persistent request for carrying out financial transactions, and/or a guarantee, and/or a forecast of future events.

The PBoC kept interest rates. The escalating war between Ukraine and Russia is negatively affecting investor sentiment

By JustMarkets

The Dow Jones Index (US30) fell by 0.28% on Tuesday. The S&P500 Index (US500) was up 0.40%, and the Nasdaq Technology Index (US100) rose by 0.71%. The escalating Ukraine-Russia war caused a de-risking of stock markets and liquidation of equities. Investors sought safer assets after Ukraine used Western-made missiles to strike Russia, and President Vladimir Putin expanded Russia’s nuclear doctrine to authorize a nuclear response to major conventional attacks.

The Canadian dollar strengthened above 1.4 per dollar as inflation data tempered expectations about the extent of the Bank of Canada’s (BoC) rate cuts. The reduced average core inflation rate, the Bank of Canada’s preferred measure of core inflation, rose to 2.6% in October from a three-year low of 2.4% in September, beating expectations. This came amid favorable economic data, including a lower-than-expected unemployment rate and strong PMI readings, further dampening prospects for a significant rate cut.

Equity markets in Europe ended trading yesterday on a weak note. Germany’s DAX (DE40) fell by 0.67%, France’s CAC 40 (FR40) closed down 0.67%, Spain’s IBEX 35 (ES35) lost 0.74%, and the UK’s FTSE 100 (UK100) closed down 0.13% on Tuesday. Concerns over the impact of US trade tariffs on Eurozone growth and geopolitical tensions weighed on sentiment.

WTI crude oil prices traded around $69 per barrel, caught between geopolitical tensions and easing worries in the Middle East. Russia’s conflict with Ukraine intensified as Ukrainian forces used Western-supplied missiles for the first time, and President Putin expanded Russia’s nuclear doctrine. Meanwhile, the IAEA announced that Iran has agreed to halt uranium production, potentially reducing tensions in the region.

Asian markets mostly rose yesterday. Japan’s Nikkei 225 (JP225) rose by 0.51%, China’s FTSE China A50 (CHA50) gained 0.35%, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng (HK50) added 0.44%, and Australia’s ASX 200 (AU200) increased by 0.89%.

The People’s Bank of China (PBOC) kept key lending rates unchanged at the November fixing, in line with market assessments. The one-year prime rate (LPR), the benchmark for most corporate and household loans, was maintained at 3/1%. The five-year rate, the benchmark for mortgage loans, remained at 3/6 %. Both rates remain at record lows following rate cuts in October and July. The latest decision reflects the Chinese Central Bank’s current assessment of existing stimulus measures.

S&P 500 (US500) 5,916.98 +23.36 (+0.40%)

Dow Jones (US30) 43,268.94 −120.66 (−0.28%)

DAX (DE40) 19,060.31 −128.88 (−0.67%)

FTSE 100 (UK100) 8,099.02 −10.30 (−0.13%)

USD index 106.18 −0.09 (−0.09%)

News feed for: 2024.11.20

  • Japan Trade Balance (m/m) at 01:50 (GMT+2);
  • China PBoC Loan Prime Rate (m/m) at 03:15 (GMT+2);
  • UK Consumer Price Index (m/m) at 09:00 (GMT+2);
  • Eurozone ECB President Lagarde Speaks at 15:00 (GMT+2);
  • US Crude Oil Reserves (w/w) at 17:30 (GMT+2).

By JustMarkets

 

This article reflects a personal opinion and should not be interpreted as an investment advice, and/or offer, and/or a persistent request for carrying out financial transactions, and/or a guarantee, and/or a forecast of future events.

The RBA will maintain a restrictive monetary policy until the end of the year.

By JustMarkets

At the end of Monday, the Dow Jones Index (US30) fell by 0.13%. The S&P 500 (US500) was up 0.39%. The Nasdaq Technology Index (US100) was up 0.71%. The US stock indices changed a little as investors await key earnings reports this week, including Nvidia (NVDA) and major retailers. In after-hours trading, Walmart (WMT) is up 1.5% ahead of its earnings release scheduled for Tuesday morning. Conversely, Alphabet (GOOG) shares are down nearly 1% following reports that the US Justice Department plans to ask a judge to force Google to abandon its Chrome browser, citing antitrust concerns. Tesla is up 5.6% following reports that President-elect Donald Trump’s team is exploring easing regulations for self-driving cars. In addition, shares of Advance Micro Devices (AMD) are up more than 3% after IBM said it had signed a deal with the company to supply MI300x gas pedal chips for its cloud network.

Equity markets in Europe ended trading yesterday on a weak note. Germany’s DAX (DE40) fell by 0.11%, France’s CAC 40 (FR40) closed up 0.12%, Spain’s IBEX 35 (ES35) rose by 0.33%, and the UK’s FTSE 100 (UK100) closed up 0.57%. Nagel, a representative of the ECB’s governing council and president of the Bundesbank, said that if international tensions escalate, this could lead to increased inflationary pressures or increased volatility in consumer price growth, and central banks may have to respond by raising interest rates. His colleague, also a representative of the ECB’s governing council, Stournaras, warned that economic activity could weaken and the Eurozone could fall into recession if the US imposes additional tariffs. Swaps discount the odds of a 25bp ECB rate cut at the December 12 meeting at 100% and a 50bp rate cut at the same meeting at 17%.

WTI crude oil prices traded above $69 per barrel on Tuesday after rising 3.2% in the previous session amid concerns over supply disruptions and ongoing geopolitical tensions. Tensions between Russia and Ukraine escalated after the US and other countries approved Ukraine’s use of US-made long-range missiles on Russian territory, which could draw the US into the conflict. Oil prices were further supported by a weaker US dollar, making oil more attractive to foreign buyers.

Asian markets traded yesterday without any unified dynamics. Japanese Nikkei 225 (JP225) declined by 1.09%, Chinese FTSE China A50 (CHA50) fell by 1.02%, Hong Kong Hang Seng (HK50) rose by 0.77%, and Australian ASX 200 (AU200) yesterday showed a positive result of 0.07%.

Top Chinese officials are gathering for an investment summit in Hong Kong, where the heads of key economic and financial bodies are expected to discuss the latest developments in China’s financial sector. Investors are also focused on the PBOC’s upcoming LPR decision scheduled for Wednesday.

The Australian dollar climbed above $0.65 on Tuesday, rising for the third consecutive session, as investors reacted to minutes from the Reserve Bank of Australia’s November meeting. The minutes showed that the Central Bank plans to maintain a restrictive monetary policy until it is confident that inflation is moving steadily toward the target while remaining cautious about upside risks to inflation. Currently, markets do not expect the RBA to cut the RBA rate until May next year, and the probability of this happening in February is estimated at 38%.

S&P 500 (US500) 5,893.62 +23.00 (+0.39%)

Dow Jones (US30) 43,389.60 −55.39 (−0.13%)

DAX (DE40) 19,189.19 −21.62 (−0.11%)

FTSE 100 (UK100) 8,109.32 +45.71 (+0.57%)

USD Index 106.23 −0.45 (−0.42%)

News feed for: 2024.11.19

  • Australia RBA Meeting Minutes at 02:30 (GMT+2);
  • Switzerland Trade Balance (m/m) at 09:00 (GMT+2);
  • Eurozone Consumer Price Index (m/m) at 12:00 (GMT+2);
  • UK Monetary Policy Report Hearings at 12:15 (GMT+2);
  • Canada Consumer Price Index (m/m) at 15:30 (GMT+2);
  • US Building Permits (m/m) at 15:30 (GMT+2).

By JustMarkets

 

This article reflects a personal opinion and should not be interpreted as an investment advice, and/or offer, and/or a persistent request for carrying out financial transactions, and/or a guarantee, and/or a forecast of future events.

Safe-haven assets rally on nuclear concerns

By ForexTime 

  • Gold ↑ 0.9% on risk-off sentiment
  • JPY best performing G10 currency vs USD today
  • Swiss franc second best performer
  • USDInd steady around 106.40
  • Risk assets take hit, US futures point to ↓ open

Investors rushed toward safer assets on Tuesday as fresh concern over the conflict in Ukraine sparked risk aversion.

Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a decree allowing Russia to fire nuclear weapons in response to any attack on its land.

This development comes after US President Joe Biden’s decision to enable Ukraine to attack Russia using US long-range weapons.

In response, a wave of risk aversion has swept across global markets with traditional safe-haven assets rallying this morning.

  • Gold

The precious metal is up almost 1%, pushing its week-to-date gains to nearly 3%.  Prices could extend higher on the risk-off sentiment with the 50-day SMA and 21-day SMA acting as key levels of interest.

gold

Bloomberg’s FX model forecasts a 72% chance that XAUUSD will trade within the $2580 – $2691.75 range, using current levels as a base, over the next one-week period.

 

  • Yen

Yen bulls are on a roll this morning, drawing strength from the risk-off mode. It has also been supported by warnings from Japanese authorities on excessive currency movements. The Yen is the best performing G10 currency today, gaining over 0.7% against the USD.

risk off

The Swiss franc is the second best performing G10 currency against the dollar, while the USD has appreciated against every other G10 currency excluding the Swiss franc and Yen.

Fears over the risk of nuclear warfare is likely to keep markets on edge this week.

Such a development may pressure risk-assets with European markets flashing red and US futures pointing to a negative open later today.

Should tensions escalate further, this could spell more gains for safe-haven assets while dragging equity markets lower.


Forex-Time-LogoArticle by ForexTime

ForexTime Ltd (FXTM) is an award winning international online forex broker regulated by CySEC 185/12 www.forextime.com

The hawkish attitude of FOMC representatives puts pressure on stock indices. Oil is growing amid escalation in Eastern Europe

By JustMarkets

At the end of Friday, the Dow Jones (US30) fell by 0.70% (-1.39% for the week). The S&P 500 Index (US500) was down 1.23% (for the week -2.30%). The Nasdaq Technology Index (US100) was down 2.40% (-3.67% for the week). Wall Street saw a sharp decline on Friday as investors evaluated Fed Chair Powell’s remarks. Fed Chair Powell’s hawkish stance on interest rates pressured the market as he emphasized the strength of the economy, a robust labor market, and steady inflation, which led to lower expectations for a rate cut. The Fed’s hawkish comments lowered the odds of a Fed rate cut next month to 55% from 82% a day earlier. US retail sales in October exceeded estimates, rising by 0.4%. The technology sector suffered significant losses, with major companies such as Nvidia, Amazon, Meta, and Alphabet falling by more than 2%. The pharmaceutical sector also came under pressure due to news that Trump may nominate vaccine skeptic Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to head the Department of Health and Human Services.

The Dollar Index held near 106.6 on Monday, trading near two-year highs amid expectations of Federal Reserve interest rate cuts and bets on US economic growth under a Trump presidency. Last week, Fed Chairman Jerome Powell said the Central Bank has no immediate plans to cut rates, citing the strength of the economy, a stable labor market, and continued inflationary pressures. Stronger-than-expected reports on retail sales and inflation supported hawkish views on Fed policy. Markets rate the odds of a 25 bps rate cut at the December 17–18 FOMC meeting as 55%.

Pfizer (PFE) shares are down more than 3% after Wolfe Research initiated coverage on the stock with an “underperform” recommendation and a $25 price target. Palantir (PLTR) is up more than 9%, leading gains in S&P 500 stocks after the company said its listing on the New York Stock Exchange will close at the close of trading on November 25, with trading on the Nasdaq beginning the following day.

Equity markets in Europe were declining on Friday. Germany’s DAX (DE40) fell by 0.27% (week ended -0.91%), France’s CAC 40 (FR40) closed down 0.58% (week ended -1.70%), Spain’s IBEX 35 (ES35) gained 0.97% (week ended -0.03%), and the UK’s FTSE 100 (UK100) closed down 0.09% (week ended -0.11%) on Friday. The European Commission’s Fall 2024 estimates call for the Eurozone economy to grow by 0.8% this year, the same as the previous Spring prognosis. Growth estimates for 2025 have been revised downward to 1.3% from 1.4%, and for 2026, the euro area economy is predicted to grow by 1.6%. As for inflation, despite a small rise in October, mainly driven by energy prices, core inflation in the Eurozone will more than halve to 2.4% in 2024 from 5.4% in 2023 and then gradually decline to 2.1% in 2025 and 1.9% in 2026.

WTI crude oil prices rose above $67 a barrel on Monday, pausing a recent decline, as the escalating conflict between Russia and Ukraine raised concerns about possible supply disruptions. Over the weekend, Russia launched its largest airstrike on Ukraine in nearly three months, further undermining an already crippled energy system. Meanwhile, concerns about weakening demand in China, the world’s largest oil importer, contributed to the bearish market sentiment. In addition, downward pressure on prices is exerted by the strengthening of the US dollar, supported by expectations of a slowdown in the pace of rate cuts by the Federal Reserve.

Asian markets were mostly declining last week. Japan’s Nikkei 225 (JP225) decreased by 1.96%, China’s FTSE China A50 (CHA50) fell by 2.40%, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng (HK50) lost 4.11%, and Australia’s ASX 200 (AU200) was negative 0.16%.

The offshore yuan weakened to 7.24 per dollar, back to its lowest level in more than three months, as investors await a decision on China’s marginal lending rate this week. Markets expect the People’s Bank of China to keep the one-year and five-year LPR rates at 3.1 percent and 3.6 percent, respectively. Last week, investors reacted to mixed economic data indicating that Beijing’s stimulus measures may not yet be yielding the expected results.

The Australian dollar stabilized above $0.645 on Monday, supported by a hawkish view on the Reserve Bank of Australia’s (RBA) monetary policy. Last week, RBA Governor Michele Bullock said that interest rates are quite restrictive and will remain at current levels until the Central Bank is confident about the inflation outlook. Investors are awaiting the release of the minutes of the latest RBA meeting this week for further guidance on the Central Bank’s policy direction.

S&P 500 (US500) 5,870.62 −78.55 (−1.32%)

Dow Jones (US30) 43,444.99 −305.87 (−0.70%)

DAX (DE40) 19,210.81 −52.89 (−0.27%)

FTSE 100 (UK100) 8,063.61 −7.58 (−0.094%)

USD Index 106.74 +0.05 (+0.05%)

News feed for: 2024.11.18

  • Japan BOJ Gov Ueda Speaks at 03:05 (GMT+2);
  • Eurozone Trade Balance at 12:00 (GMT+2);
  • Eurozone ECB President Lagarde Speaks at 20:30 (GMT+2).

By JustMarkets

 

This article reflects a personal opinion and should not be interpreted as an investment advice, and/or offer, and/or a persistent request for carrying out financial transactions, and/or a guarantee, and/or a forecast of future events.

Profit-taking is observed on stock indices. The data on wages in Australia haven’t met expectations

By JustMarkets

At the end of Tuesday, the Dow Jones Index (US30) fell by 0.29%. The S&P 500 Index (US500) was down 0.29%. The NASDAQ Technology Index (US100) closed negative 0.17%. Higher bond yields on Tuesday contributed to some profit-taking in equities after five consecutive sessions of gains. In addition, the liquidation of long positions in equities ahead of Wednesday’s release of the US consumer price report had a negative impact on the overall market.

Shares of Nvidia (NVDA) closed higher by more than 2% after Redburn initiated a “buy” recommendation with a $178 price target. Airbnb (ABNB) shares closed down more than 2% after Phillip Securities downgraded the stock to a downgrade from neutral with a $120 price target.

Today, the US will release its monthly consumer inflation report. Economists expect annualized core inflation, which excludes food and fuel costs, to remain at 3.3%. Overall inflation is estimated at 2.5% y/y, up from 2.4% y/y last month. The October CPI may not have a strong impact on the market, as the US Fed will have both October and November inflation reports in hand before the December meeting, and the decision will be based more on the latest report. Also, the Trump factor should not be ruled out, as many believe that his proposals, in particular tariff hikes, may lead to higher consumer prices. Therefore, if the inflation data remains stable or shows a slight increase, it will be more positive for the US dollar as it will increase the probability that the US Fed may pause in December. If, however, the inflation data is better than expected and shows a reduction in inflationary pressures, this will hurt the US dollar but will be positive for indices and precious metals.

Equity markets in Europe decreased yesterday. Germany’s DAX (DE40) fell by 2.13%, France’s CAC 40 (FR40) closed down 2.69%, Spain’s IBEX 35 (ES35) lost 1.85%, and the UK’s FTSE 100 (UK100) closed down 1.22%. Expectations for German economic growth in the November ZEW survey unexpectedly fell by 3.7 to 7.4 versus expectations of an increase to 13.2. ECB Governing Council spokesman Rehn said yesterday that disinflation in the Eurozone is “well underway” and “this strengthens the case for an ECB rate cut in December.” Swaps discount the odds of a 25bp ECB rate cut at the December 12 meeting at 100% and a 50bp rate cut at the same meeting at 23%.

WTI crude oil prices rose above $68 a barrel on Wednesday, rebounding slightly from two-week lows, helped by a short-term supply shortage in the physical market. Investors also continued to assess OPEC’s latest downwardly revised demand growth estimates for 2024 and 2025, driven in part by China’s slowing economy. While OPEC’s estimates remain higher than those of other agencies, the lower demand outlook and China’s weakness continue to weigh on market sentiment.

Asian markets were predominantly down yesterday. Japan’s Nikkei 225 (JP225) fell by 0.40%, China’s FTSE China A50 (CHA50) lost 1.06%, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng (HK50) decreased by 2.84% and Australia’s ASX 200 (AU200) was negative 0.13%.

Australian wage growth slowed to a near two-year low of 3.5% in the third quarter, missing estimates of 3.6%. On a more positive note, consumer confidence rose to a two-and-a-half-year high in November, driven by easing fears of interest rate hikes. Currently, markets do not expect a rate cut by the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) shortly, with the first possible rate cut expected in mid-2025.

The New Zealand dollar traded near its lowest level since early August as the US dollar strengthened further on speculation that Treasury yields will rise due to President-elect Trump’s pro-tariff policies, which could lead to higher inflation. Additional pressure on the kiwi came from China’s recent stimulus measures, which failed to meet investor expectations and dampened demand prospects from New Zealand’s largest trading partner. Domestically, markets are expecting another 50 basis point rate cut by the Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ) later this month, with the possibility of a further 75 basis point cut being considered.

S&P 500 (US500) 5,983.99 −17.36 (−0.29%)

Dow Jones (US30) 43,910.98 −382.15 (−0.86%)

DAX (DE40) 19,033.64 −414.96 (−2.13%)

FTSE 100 (UK100) 8,025.77 −99.42 (−1.22%)

USD Index 105.94 +0.39 (+0.37%)

News feed for: 2024.11.13

  • US FOMC Member Harker Speaks at 00:00 (GMT+2);
  • US FOMC Member Barkin Speaks at 00:30 (GMT+2);
  • Japan Producer Price Index (m/m) at 01:50 (GMT+2);
  • Australia Wage Price Index (q/q) at 02:30 (GMT+2);
  • US Consumer Price Index (m/m) at 15:30 (GMT+2);
  • US FOMC Member Logan Speaks at 16:45 (GMT+2);
  • US FOMC Member Musalem Speaks at 20:00 (GMT+2);
  • US FOMC Member Schmid Speaks at 20:30 (GMT+2).

By JustMarkets

 

This article reflects a personal opinion and should not be interpreted as an investment advice, and/or offer, and/or a persistent request for carrying out financial transactions, and/or a guarantee, and/or a forecast of future events.

Companies are buying up cheap carbon offsets − data suggest it’s more about greenwashing than helping the climate

By Sehoon Kim, University of Florida 

Carbon offsets have become big business as more companies make promises to protect the climate but can’t meet the goals on their own.

When a company buys carbon offsets, it pays a project elsewhere to reduce greenhouse gas emissions on its behalf – by planting trees, for example, or generating renewable energy. The idea is that reducing greenhouse gas emissions anywhere pays off for the global climate.

But not all offsets have the same value. There is growing skepticism about many of the offsets sold on voluntary carbon markets. In contrast to compliance markets, where companies buy and sell a limited number of allowances that are issued by regulators, these voluntary carbon markets have few rules that can be enforced consistently. Investigations have found that many voluntary offset projects, forest management projects in particular, have done little to benefit the climate despite their claims.

I specialize in sustainable finance and corporate governance. My colleagues and I recently conducted the first systematic, evidence-based look at the global landscape of voluntary carbon offsets used by hundreds of large, publicly listed firms around the world.

The results raise questions about how some companies use these offsets and cast doubt on how effective voluntary carbon markets – at least in their current state – are in assisting a global transition to net-zero-emissions.

Which companies use low-quality offsets might surprise you

Our analysis shows that the global carbon-offset market has grown to comprise a rich variety of offset projects. Some generate renewable energy, contribute to energy-efficient housing and appliances, or capture and store carbon. Others preserve forests and grassland. The majority are based in Asia, Africa and the Americas, but they exist in other regions too.

Companies use these projects to boost their environmental claims in order to help attract investors, customers and support from various groups. That practice has skyrocketed, from virtually nothing in 2005 to roughly 30 million metric tons of carbon offset per year in 2022. Investment banking firm Morgan Stanley in 2023 forecast that the voluntary offset market would grow to about US$100 billion by 2030 and to around $250 billion by 2050.

For our analysis, we examined 866 publicly traded companies that used offsets between 2005 and 2021.

We found that large firms with a high percentage of big institutional investors and commitments to reach net-zero emissions are particularly active in voluntary carbon markets.

Our results also reveal a peculiar pattern: Industries with relatively low emissions, such as services and financial industries, are much more intensive in their use of offsets. Some used offsets for almost all of the emissions cuts they claimed.

In contrast, high-emissions industries, such as oil and gas, utilities or transportation, used negligible amounts of offsets compared to their heavy carbon footprints.

These facts cast a cloud of doubt on how effective voluntary carbon markets could really be at cutting global greenhouse gas emissions. They also raise questions about companies’ motives for using offsets.

Why companies rely on offsets: 2 explanations

One explanation for these patterns is that offsetting is a means to “outsource” efforts to transition away from greenhouse gas emissions. Companies with smaller carbon footprints find it cheaper to buy offsets than to make expensive investments in reducing their own emissions.

At the same time, we found that emissions-heavy companies were more likely to reduce their own emissions in-house, because offsetting massive amounts of emissions every year for an indefinite future would be more costly.

A more pernicious explanation for the growth in voluntary offsets is that offsets enable “greenwashing.” In this view, companies use offsets to cheaply refurbish their image to naive stakeholders who are not well informed about the quality of offsets. Agencies rate offset projects on how likely they are to meet their climate claims, among other indicators of the trustworthiness of offsets. Our reviews of pricing data and ratings found that projects rated as low quality have substantially lower prices.

We found that relatively few of the 1,413 offset projects used by companies in our sample had been verified as high quality by an external carbon rating agency. Most offset credits used by companies were strikingly cheap. More than 70% of retired offsets were priced below $4 per ton.

These explanations are not mutually exclusive. We found that low-emissions companies could easily alter their peer rankings for ESG performance – how well they do on environmental, social and governance issues – by offsetting a small quantity of emissions.

Fixing the voluntary market for the future

Our findings have important implications as policymakers and regulators debate rules for the voluntary carbon markets.

The data suggests that voluntary carbon markets are currently flooded with cheap, low-quality offsets, likely due to a lack of integrity guidelines and regulations for voluntary carbon markets to ensure the transparency and authenticity of offset projects. This lack of guidelines may also encourage the use of low-quality offsets.

Ever since Article 6 of the Paris climate agreement created principles for carbon markets and ways countries could cooperate to reach climate targets, agreeing on how to implement those principles has been a challenge. For the principles to be successful, negotiators must agree on project eligibility and information disclosure standards, among other issues.

In April 2024, SBTi, the world’s leading science-based arbiter of corporate climate targets, added urgency to that process when it announced that it would allow companies to meet their carbon goals with carbon offsets to cover emissions in their supply chains.

The following month, the U.S. Treasury, Energy and Agriculture departments jointly released a policy statement laying out their own template for rules to govern voluntary carbon markets. “Voluntary carbon markets can help unlock the power of private markets to reduce emissions, but that can only happen if we address significant existing challenges,” U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said at the time.

Article 6 and standards for carbon offsets are on the agenda for the 2024 United Nations climate conference, COP29, Nov. 11-22 in Baku, Azerbaijan.

With many segments of voluntary carbon markets faltering, the COP29 summit may be a make-or-break moment for voluntary carbon offsets to become a viable contributor to decarbonization going forward.The Conversation

About the Author:

Sehoon Kim, Assistant Professor of Finance, University of Florida

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

 

The Dow Jones broke the 44 000 mark, and the S&P 500 topped 6 000 for the first time. The deflationary scenario continues in China

By JustMarkets

On Friday, the Dow Jones (US30) rose by 0.59% to reach 44,000 points for the first time (up +4.72% for the week). The S&P 500 Index (US500) gained 0.38% and surpassed the 6,000-point mark for the first time (for the week +4.72%). The NASDAQ Technology Index (US100) closed positive 0.07% (for the week +5.52%). The US stocks continued to rise and closed at record highs on Friday, helped by the optimism associated with Donald Trump’s victory and the Federal Reserve’s interest rate cut. The best-performing sectors were utilities, real estate, and consumer staples, while commodities lagged. Tesla (TSLA) shares jumped 8.2% to $321 as the company reached a trillion-dollar valuation for the first time in two years.

Bitcoin hit the $80,000 mark for the first time, fueled by expectations that Trump would introduce more digital-assets-friendly regulations. During his campaign, Trump vowed to make the US the “capital of digital assets” by creating a strategic Bitcoin reserve and appointing friendlier regulators. Musk, one of Trump’s prominent supporters in this election, has echoed that sentiment, warning that the US risks falling behind if it doesn’t lead innovation in the digital assets’ space.

Equity markets in Europe were declining on Friday. Germany’s DAX (DE40) fell by 0.76% (-0.09% for the week), France’s CAC 40 (FR40) closed down 1.17% (-0.65% for the week), Spain’s IBEX 35 (ES35) lost 0.16% (-2.28% for the week), and the UK’s FTSE 100 (UK100) decreased by 0.84% (-1.28% for the week).

WTI crude oil prices fell as low as $70 per barrel on Monday, extending a decline of nearly 3% from the previous session, as a subdued outlook for major importer China continued to weigh on the market. Data released over the weekend showed weak consumer inflation in China in October and another decline in factory prices, pointing to the risk of deflation despite Beijing’s stimulus measures in late September.

Asian markets were mostly up last week. Japan’s Nikkei 225 (JP225) rose by 2.59%, China’s FTSE China A50 (CHA50) gained 1.20%, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng (HK50) added 0.70%, and Australia’s ASX 200 (AU200) posted a positive 1.54%.

The Australian dollar stabilized near $0.659 on Monday after falling sharply by 1.4% in the previous session as China’s latest stimulus announcements failed to meet market expectations. On Friday, China announced a 10 trillion yuan debt package aimed at easing local government financing and supporting weak economic growth but did not announce any direct economic stimulus.

China’s annual inflation rate in October 2024 was 0.3%, compared with market estimates and September’s 0.4%. It was the ninth consecutive month but the lowest since June, underscoring the growing risks of deflation despite Beijing’s stimulus measures in late September to support the slowing economy. Core consumer prices, excluding food and energy, rose by 0.2% y/y after the lowest gain since February 2021 at 0.1% in September. China’s producer prices fell to 2.9% y/y in October 2024 after declining 2.8% in the previous month and exceeding market expectations for a 2.5% decline. This marked the 25th consecutive month of producer price deflation and the sharpest decline since November 2023, indicating continued weak domestic demand.

S&P 500 (US500) 5,995.54 +22.44 (+0.38%)

Dow Jones (US30) 43,988.99 +259.65 (+0.59%)

DAX (DE40) 19,215.48 −147.04 (−0.76%)

FTSE 100 (UK100) 8,072.39 −68.35 (−0.84%)

USD Index 105.04 +0.04 (+0.04%)

News feed for: 2024.11.11

  • New Zealand Inflation Expectations (q/q) at 04:00 (GMT+2).

By JustMarkets

 

This article reflects a personal opinion and should not be interpreted as an investment advice, and/or offer, and/or a persistent request for carrying out financial transactions, and/or a guarantee, and/or a forecast of future events.

World central banks continue to cut interest rates. US stock indices break records again

By JustMarkets

The Dow Jones Index (US30) closed Thursday at the opening price. The S&P 500 Index (US500) gained 0.74%. The NASDAQ Technology Index (US100) closed positive 1.54%. Meanwhile, the S&P 500 and NASDAQ indices hit new all-time highs. Stocks are rising amid speculation that President-elect Trump will boost corporate profits by cutting taxes and reducing regulation. Stock indices also rose as the FOMC, as expected, lowered the target range for the federal funds rate by 25 bps to 4.50%–4.75% from 4.75%–5.00% and said risks to the targets remain “roughly balanced.” The Central Bank noted that labor market conditions have generally eased, and inflation is trending lower, although it remains “somewhat elevated.”

The Mexican peso (MXN) rose to 19.9 per US dollar, rebounding from a two-and-a-half-year low of 20.27 hit on November 1, thanks to hawkish expectations from the Bank of Mexico. October annual inflation rose to 4.76%, beating estimates and September’s six-month low of 4.58%, which may prompt the Bank of Mexico to slow rate cuts and keep rates relatively high, thereby attracting foreign capital and strengthening the peso.

Equity markets in Europe rose steadily yesterday. Germany’s DAX (DE40) rose by 1.70%, France’s CAC 40 (FR40) closed higher by 0.76%, Spain’s IBEX 35 (ES35) gained 0.65%, and the UK’s FTSE 100 (UK100) closed negative 0.32%.

The Bank of England cut interest rates to 4.75% as expected but estimated higher inflation and economic growth following the government’s new budget, which, due to prognoses of the Bank of England, will add almost 0.5 percentage points to peak inflation and delay the return to the 2% target by a year, and boost economic growth by 0.75% in 2024.

In November 2024, Norges Bank left its key rate unchanged at a high of 4.5% for the seventh consecutive meeting, matching market expectations, and signaled that it would hold the rate again in its upcoming December decision. The Central Bank said that restrictive monetary policy is still justified in bringing inflation down to the target level, delaying the start of monetary easing compared to other monetary authorities in Europe.

As expected, Sweden’s Riksbank cut its key rate by 50 bps to 2.75% at its November meeting. The Central Bank has cut the key rate four times this year since May in response to falling inflation and sluggish economic activity. Economic growth has stalled, and inflation has fallen below the 2% target.

The Central Bank of the United Arab Emirates cut its benchmark overnight deposit rate by 25 basis points to 4.65% in November 2024, closely following the US Federal Reserve’s rate cut. However, the interest rate on short-term liquid borrowings from the regulator remained 50 basis points above the prime rate. The UAE Central Bank’s prime rate, which is linked to the Fed Reserve Rate, reflects the path of monetary policy and sets the floor for interest rates in the UAE overnight market.

WTI crude oil prices fell below $72 per barrel on Friday but maintained an upward trend for the week, as investors weigh factors impacting future oil demand and supply. Market sentiment is affected by uncertainty surrounding the incoming Donald Trump administration, which could affect oil prices by increasing US production and possibly imposing tariffs that could slow the economy of China, the world’s largest oil importer, thereby dampening demand. Expectations that the Trump administration may impose tougher sanctions on oil-producing countries such as Iran and Venezuela could also support oil prices as such measures could curb global supply.

Asian markets traded flat yesterday. Japan’s Nikkei 225 (JP225) was down 0.25%, China’s FTSE China A50 (CHA50) was up 3.45%, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng (HK50) added 2.02% and Australia’s ASX 200 (AU200) was positive 0.76%.

The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) cut its benchmark rate by 25 bps to 5.0% on November 8, hours after the US Federal Reserve cut interest rates by the same amount. Monetary policy in the Asian financial hub has become aligned with the US as the local currency is pegged to the US dollar.

The offshore yuan has fallen in value to about 7.16 per dollar as investors fear possible additional tariffs following Donald Trump’s presidential election victory. During his campaign, Trump promised to boost US manufacturing by proposing tariffs of 60% or more on Chinese goods. Markets are betting that Beijing will introduce additional stimulus measures to counter the risk of higher tariffs under a second Trump administration.

Japan’s Index of leading economic indicators, which gauges the economic outlook for the coming months based on data such as job offers and consumer sentiment, rose to 109.4 in September 2024 from 106.9 the previous month, the lowest since October 2020.

S&P 500 (US500) 5,973.10 +44.06 (+0.74%)

Dow Jones (US30) 43,729.34 −0.59 (−0.01%)

DAX (DE40) 19,362.52 +323.21 (+1.70%)

FTSE 100 (UK100) 8,140.74 −25.94 (−0.32%)

USD Index 104.36 −0.73 (−0.69%)

News feed for: 2024.11.08

  • Canada Unemployment Rate (m/m) at 15:30 (GMT+2);
  • US Michigan Consumer Sentiment (m/m) at 17:00 (GMT+2).

By JustMarkets

 

This article reflects a personal opinion and should not be interpreted as an investment advice, and/or offer, and/or a persistent request for carrying out financial transactions, and/or a guarantee, and/or a forecast of future events.