Archive for Energy – Page 4

Brent has risen with support from an OPEC+ decision

By RoboForex Analytical Department

The price of a Brent barrel climbed to 81.20 USD on Monday.

The market primarily relies on OPEC+ member countries reducing crude oil supply to control prices. Energy carrier prices have declined for four consecutive weeks due to diminishing concerns about supply disruptions related to the Middle East conflict.

An OPEC+ meeting is scheduled for 26 November. The possibility of discussing additional supply cuts may arise.

Since the end of September, crude oil prices have dropped by nearly 20%.

Technical analysis of Brent oil:

On the H4 Brent chart, a growth wave is forming to 82.72. A correction to 79.70 might follow, after which a new growth wave to 86.85 could initiate. This is a local target. Technically, this scenario is confirmed by the MACD, with its signal line below zero, strictly pointing upwards.

On the H1 Brent chart, the growth wave movement to 82.72 is complete. This represents the first target. After the price reaches this level, a correction to 79.70 is expected to start, and a rise to 83.25 is expected next. Breaking through this level may unlock the potential for climbing to 86.85. This is a local target. Technically, this scenario is confirmed by the Stochastic oscillator, with its signal line above 80, strictly pointing upwards. New highs are expected to be set in this scenario.

Disclaimer

Any predictions contained herein are based on the author’s particular opinion. This analysis shall not be treated as trading advice. RoboForex shall not be held liable for the results of the trades arising from relying upon trading recommendations and reviews contained herein.

Hydrogen Firm Craters Over Liquidity Concerns

Source: Streetwise Reports  (11/16/23)

Many people consider hydrogen an important part of the emerging green economy. However, one major player in the field for the past 20 years is facing new and growing issues.

Plug Power Inc. (PLUG:NASDAQ) has spent the past two decades trying to position itself as a provider of turnkey hydrogen fuel cell turnkey solutions. It provides electrolyzers that allow industrial refueling stations to generate hydrogen on-site for use as a fuel.

Plug Power focuses on using this fuel for industrial mobility applications, including electric forklifts and electric industrial vehicles, as well as stationary power systems that support critical operations, such as data centers, microgrids, and generation facilities.

Its technologies are designed to be used in both backup power and continuous power roles, with the ultimate goal of replacing batteries, diesel generators, and the grid for telecommunication logistics, transportation, and utility customers.

The company’s products include GenDrive, GenFuel, GenCare, GenSure, GenKey, ProGen, Electrolyzers, Liquefaction Systems and Cryogenic Equipment. It serves the North American and European material handling markets. It is based in LathamNew York.

 Collapsing Share Price, Market Confidence

On November 13, Investing.com reported that “Plug Power shares slipped in premarket U.S. trading, extending a steep loss posted on Friday, after Morgan Stanley slashed its share price target of the hydrogen fuel cell system developer in the wake of a going concern warning.”

Morgan Stanley lowered its price target for Plug Power from US$9.00 to US$3.50, explaining that it expects “valuation pressure will remain until the company, at a minimum, improves its liquidity position.”

“[We] believe the next three to four months will be consequential in rebuilding investor confidence in the business model,” Morgan Stanley analysts wrote.

Morgan Stanley lowered its price target for Plug Power from US$9.00 to US$3.50, explaining that it expects “valuation pressure will remain until the company, at a minimum, improves its liquidity position.”

This considerable valuation downgrade comes after Plug Power raised doubts about its own viability last week. In a regulatory filing, the company estimated that its “existing cash and available for sale and equity securities will not be sufficient to fund its operations” over a 12-month horizon.

Quite simply, the company was expressing that it would need to secure additional capital in order to stay in business, a concern that the Morgan Stanley analysts echoed. Plug Power claims it is facing a “historically difficult” hydrogen supply environment, especially in North America, where it is facing “multiple frequent force majeure events.”

Shares in the company lost more than 40% of their value on Friday, and the company as a whole has lost over half of its market capitalization since the start of the year.

Hydrogen Hype Hides Inefficiencies

Hydrogen as a fuel has a long and storied history, but the tech and associated supply lines have never really matured in a manner capable of causing a green revolution. In fact, over two years ago, Forbes was already asking, “Why Are We Still Talking About Hydrogen?” In that insightful piece, James Morris examined the many impediments to widespread hydrogen adoption.

Chief among these is that “It can’t seem to escape how massively inefficient it is compared to battery-powered alternatives.”

“The flaw is basically caused by the laws of physics,” Morris explains. “For hydrogen to be completely green, it must be produced by electrolyzing water, which splits this into the H2 and O that it is made of.

New Constructs credit rating issued a suspended neutral rating for Plug Power on November 11, classing the company’s Adjusted Debt to Capital and Adjusted Cash to Debt ratios as “Very Attractive” while listing the Adjusted EBITDA to Debt and Adjusted FCF (3yr avg) to Debt ratios, as well as the Adjusted Interest Coverage, as “Very Unattractive.”

You can produce H2 from fossil fuels (usually methane), but this creates either “gray” hydrogen (which still produces lots of CO2) or “blue” hydrogen (which captures 90% of the CO2 and stores it, merely delaying the problem). Only electrolyzing hydrogen from water using electricity generated from renewable sources makes the fuel entirely green.”

“This is an inefficient system that wastes energy,” Morris continues. “According to a frequently cited study by Transport & Environment, the process of electrolyzing hydrogen already loses 30% of the energy from the process of splitting the H2 from the O. You then have another 26% loss of the remaining energy from transporting the hydrogen to the fuel station, meaning you’ve already lost a total of 48% of the energy before any hydrogen makes it into a vehicle.”

“You can save some of this by making hydrogen on-site,” — which is the model Plug Power is attempting to develop — “but electrolysis plants cost millions, so they will more likely be centralized.

In comparison, the typical loss from transferring electricity over wires to a charging station is just 5%, so you still have 95% left.”

Non-Automotive Solutions

Now, there’s a valid argument that Plug Power isn’t competing in the automotive market but rather in the industrial space. However, as electric vehicle technology grows in popularity, we will inevitably see spillover into industrial uses, such as forklift operation, further squeezing the market for on-site industrial solutions.

In addition, poor efficiency is only one of the concerns associated with the increased use of hydrogen fuel in industrial settings. Writing for Issues in Science and Technology, Joseph J. Romm explains that “hydrogen has its own major safety issues. It is highly flammable, with an ignition energy that is 20 times smaller than that of natural gas or gasoline. It can be ignited by cell phones or by electrical storms located miles away.”

“Hence,” he writes, “leaks pose a significant fire hazard, particularly because they are hard to detect. Hydrogen is odorless, and the addition of common odorants such as sulfur is impractical, in part because they poison fuel cells. Hydrogen burns nearly invisibly, and people have unwittingly stepped into hydrogen flames.”

“Hydrogen can cause many metals, including the carbon steel widely used in gas pipelines, to become brittle. In addition, any high-pressure storage tank presents a risk of rupture. For these reasons, hydrogen is subject to strict and cumbersome codes and standards, especially when used in an enclosed space where a leak might create a growing gas bubble.”

These strict use codes further hamper the industry’s ability to endorse and onboard hydrogen solutions, even where they would otherwise be a decent fit.

“Some 22% or more of hydrogen accidents are caused by undetected hydrogen leaks,” Romm reports.

Such leaks occur “despite the special training, standard operating procedures, protective clothing, electronic flame gas detectors provided to the limited number of hydrogen workers,” writes Russell Moy, former group leader for energy storage programs at Ford, in the November 2003 Energy Law Journal, concluding that “with this track record, it is difficult to imagine how hydrogen risks can be managed acceptably by the general public when wide-scale deployment of the safety precautions would be costly and public compliance impossible to ensure.”

Why Now? Massive Discount

Given the realities of the hydrogen market and the considerable barriers to its growth mentioned above, it might be easy to give up on Plug Power. Clearly, many former shareholders have already made that determination.

That said, where some see crisis, others see opportunity. If you’ve been looking for an undervalued pathway into the hydrogen market in particular — perhaps as a hedge against electric vehicles or even fossil fuels — this massive writedown could be just the goad you need to pick up a position after someone else has eaten a major loss.

However, if you choose to play in these waters, remember that volatility is the name of the game. Third-party advisors seem more unsure of what to do with Plug Power than any stock in recent memory.

Streetwise Ownership Overview*

Plug Power Inc. (PLUG:NASDAQ)

Institutions: 56.95%
Retail: 33.08%
Strategic Investors: 9.08%
Management & Insiders: 0.89%
57.0%
33.1%
9.1%
*Share Structure as of 11/16/2023

 

For example, New Constructs credit rating issued a suspended neutral rating for Plug Power on November 11, classing the company’s Adjusted Debt to Capital and Adjusted Cash to Debt ratios as “Very Attractive” while listing the Adjusted EBITDA to Debt and Adjusted FCF (3yr avg) to Debt ratios, as well as the Adjusted Interest Coverage, as “Very Unattractive.”

Ownership and Share Structure

According to Reuters, 0.89% of the company is owned by management and insiders. Out of this group, Director and Chairman of the Board George McNamee has the most at 0.15%, with 0.94 million shares.

9.08% is with one strategic investor, SK Inc., which owns 9.08%, at 54.97 million shares.

56.95% is held by institutions. Top investors in this category include The Vangaurd Group Inc. at 8.85%, with 53.60 million shares, and BlackRock Institutional Trust Company N.A. at 4.98%, with 30.16 million.

The rest is with retail investors.

Plug Power Inc. has a market cap of  US$2.13 billion with 605.5 million shares outstanding.

 

Important Disclosures:

  1. Owen Ferguson wrote this article for Streetwise Reports LLC and provides services to Streetwise Reports as an independent contractor.
  2. The article does not constitute investment advice. Each reader is encouraged to consult with his or her individual financial professional and any action a reader takes as a result of information presented here is his or her own responsibility. By opening this page, each reader accepts and agrees to Streetwise Reports’ terms of use and full legal disclaimer. This article is not a solicitation for investment. Streetwise Reports does not render general or specific investment advice and the information on Streetwise Reports should not be considered a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Streetwise Reports does not endorse or recommend the business, products, services or securities of any company mentioned on Streetwise Reports.

For additional disclosures, please click here.

Week Ahead: More pain ahead for oil?

By ForexTime 

  • Oil tumbles into bear market on demand fears
  • Keep eye on incoming EIA report and US data
  • Oil slump throws OPEC+ into spotlight
  • Bears in power but RSI oversold
  • Key levels of interest at $75.30, $72.50 and $70

Despite the holiday-shortened week ahead in the United States, financial markets could see some action thanks to top-tier economic releases across the globe.

Monday, 20th November   

  • CNH: China loan prime rates
  • GBP: Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey
  • USD: Conference Board leading index

Tuesday, 21st November 

  • CAD: Canada CPI
  • EUR: Eurozone new car registrations
  • NZD: New Zealand trade
  • USD: US FOMC minutes, existing home sales
  • NQ100_m: Nvidia earnings

Wednesday, 22nd November

  • EUR: Eurozone consumer confidence
  • GBP: UK government’s Autumn Statement
  • USD: US initial jobless claims, University of Michigan consumer sentiment

Thursday, 23rd November  

  • EUR: Eurozone/Germany S&P Global PMIs
  • GBP: UK S&P Global /CIPS Manufacturing PMI
  • US Markets closed – Thanksgiving holiday

Friday, 24th November

  • CAD: Canada retail sales
  • EUR: Germany IFO business climate, GDP
  • JPY: Japan CPI
  • USD: S&P Global manufacturing PMI
  • US markets close early – 1:00 pm ET

Sunday, 26th November

  • OPEC+ meeting

Our focus falls on crude oil which has collapsed into a bear market. 

The global commodity is under intense pressure, heading for its fourth straight week of declines.

Note: A bear market happens when an instrument drops by 20% or more from its most recent high.

The pain started mid-week as swelling US inventories fuelled demand-side fears with disappointing economic data from the largest economy in the world exciting oil bears further.

Before the hefty 4.7% selloff this week, oil prices were already being pressured by weak data from China and easing fears over the Israel-Hamas conflict disrupting supply from the region.

With the path of least resistance for oil pointing south, further losses could be on the cards.

Here are 4 key factors that may influence oil in the week ahead:

  1. US Energy Information Agency (EIA) report

It is worth noting that markets received 2 weeks of data from the EIA due to a planned system upgrade.

Crude oil inventories expanded for a fourth week, rising by 3.6 million barrels in the week ended November 10. This was followed by a huge 13.9 million-barrel build in the previous period.

The next EIA report published on Wednesday 22nd November may shape oil’s short to medium-term outlook.

  • Another build in US crude inventories may further darken the demand outlook, dragging the global commodity lower as a result.
  • A decline in US inventories could soothe fears around waning oil demand, potentially limiting downside pressures on crude.
  1. FOMC minutes + US data 

Much has changed since the Federal Reserve policy meeting on the 1st of November with the soft US inflation report extinguishing any remaining bets around the Fed hiking rates.

Nevertheless, the Fed minutes could offer additional insight into what Fed officials thought about the US economic outlook. On the data front, there will be some key economic releases including the US initial jobless claims, university of Michigan consumer sentiment, and manufacturing PMI which could trigger dollar volatility.

  • Should the minutes strike a cautious note and overall US economic data disappoint, this could feed fears around waning demand – dragging oil prices lower.
  • While a positive set of US economic data may quell fears around the demand outlook and supporting oil – a stronger dollar could limit upside gains.
  1. Anticipation ahead of OPEC+ meeting 

Note: the full impacts of what is decided during the OPEC+ meeting will not be reflected until Monday 27th November. However, the growing anticipation could influence oil prices ahead of this major event.

Oil prices are trading at their lowest levels since July ahead of the OPEC+ meeting on Sunday 26th November.

The latest selloff in oil prices has added more focus to the upcoming meeting, opening the doors for greater supply cuts as the cartel continues its quest to rebalance markets. It is worth keeping in mind that OPEC+ has been cutting production since late 2022 with a broader deal to limit supply throughout 2024.

Markets already expect the extension of production cuts by Saudi Arabia and Russia into the early parts of 2024. So, the cartel may need to offer something new to revive oil bulls.

  • Oil prices could be thrown a lifeline if the cartel moves ahead with deeper supply cuts.
  1. Technical forces 

Prices are under intense pressure on the daily charts with crude respecting a bearish channel. There have been consistently lower lows and lower highs while the MACD trades to the downside. However, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) is flirting near 30, indicating that crude may be oversold. While this has the potential to trigger a technical rebound, the scales of power remain in favour of bears.

  • A solid daily close below $74 could send prices back towards $72.50 and $70, respectively.
  • Should prices push back above $75.30, this could open the doors towards the 200-day SMA at $78 and $79.80.


Forex-Time-LogoArticle by ForexTime

ForexTime Ltd (FXTM) is an award winning international online forex broker regulated by CySEC 185/12 www.forextime.com

Brent Oil Price is Declining Again

By RoboForex Analytical Department

The commodity market started the week with a new wave of selloffs. The price of a barrel of Brent crude decreased to 80.65 USD.

Investors began reducing long positions on Friday amid uncertainty in the Middle East.

This week, the monthly reports from the International Energy Agency and OPEC are expected to be released. These documents will hold fresh assessments of the situation in the oil sector and, possibly, forecasted supply and demand parameters.

Also, the market eagerly awaits the latest inflation statistics from the US. This is one of the key indicators in shaping the Fed’s monetary policy, which is also significant for the oil market.

Brent technical analysis

On the H4 chart, Brent has completed an upward impulse reaching the level of 81.89. Today, the quotes might correct to 80.37. After the correction is completed, a new wave of growth to 84.00 could begin, from where the trend could continue to 87.87. Technically, this scenario is confirmed by the MACD indicator. Its signal line is below zero and strictly directed upwards.

On the H1 chart, Brent has completed an upward wave to 81.89. Today, a correction to 80.37 is forming. After the price reaches this level, a wave of growth to 81.89 could follow. A breakout of this level could open the potential for a rise to 84.09. This is a local target. Technically, this scenario is confirmed by the Stochastic oscillator: its signal line is below 20 and strictly directed upwards. The indicator is expected to renew the highs.

Disclaimer

Any forecasts contained herein are based on the author’s particular opinion. This analysis may not be treated as trading advice. RoboForex bears no responsibility for trading results based on trading recommendations and reviews contained herein.

My Newest Electrification Play as Demand for Nuclear Surges

Source: Michael Ballanger  (11/6/23)

 As the demand for uranium grows, Michael Ballanger of GGM Advisory Inc. shares one stock he believes is worth looking into.

I have been bullish on uranium since 2017, which means I have seen two rallies, neither of which I traded.

At the start of the year, I came up with the concept of the “Electrification Trilogy,” calling for increases in demand for new sources of electricity (nuclear/uranium), transmission infrastructure (wiring/copper), and electrical storage (batteries/lithium) and while I maintained exposure to copper and lithium, I really only had a small position in one uranium developer forgetting all the while that the best proxy for uranium has to be Cameco Corp. (CCO:TSX; CCJ:NYSE).

While I find it difficult to own any stock after it has nearly doubled, I listened to the conference call this week after they reported blow-out earnings, and what grabbed me by the throat was the forward guidance in which they said: “We are seeing durable, full-cycle demand growth across the nuclear energy industry.”

That is really positive guidance, and with 57 new reactors currently under construction around the globe and with Germany reversing their decision to dismantle three of their power plants, the demand for uranium is going to kick in long before new supply can hit the market.

Accordingly, I decided to bite the bullet and take a punt on a few Cameco March US$40 calls in the US$5.00 range on the assumption that I will see all-time highs above US$46.41 by New Year’s Day and US$50 in Q1/2024.

I know I am late to the party, but with guidance so powerfully bullish and nuclear the only real solution to the global energy problem, I cannot see getting hurt despite the modest overbought conditions it moved into on Friday before backing off.

Important Disclosures:

  1. As of the date of this article, officers and/or employees of Streetwise Reports LLC (including members of their household) own securities of Cameco Corp.
  2. Michael Ballanger: I, or members of my immediate household or family, own securities of: Cameco Corp. My company has a financial relationship with: Cameco Corp. I determined which companies would be included in this article based on my research and understanding of the sector.
  3. Statements and opinions expressed are the opinions of the author and not of Streetwise Reports or its officers. The author is wholly responsible for the validity of the statements. The author was not paid by Streetwise Reports for this article. Streetwise Reports was not paid by the author to publish or syndicate this article. Streetwise Reports requires contributing authors to disclose any shareholdings in, or economic relationships with, companies that they write about. Streetwise Reports relies upon the authors to accurately provide this information and Streetwise Reports has no means of verifying its accuracy.
  4.  This article does not constitute investment advice. Each reader is encouraged to consult with his or her individual financial professional. By opening this page, each reader accepts and agrees to Streetwise Reports’ terms of use and full legal disclaimer. This article is not a solicitation for investment. Streetwise Reports does not render general or specific investment advice and the information on Streetwise Reports should not be considered a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Streetwise Reports does not endorse or recommend the business, products, services or securities of any company.

For additional disclosures, please click here.

Michael Ballanger Disclosures

This letter makes no guarantee or warranty on the accuracy or completeness of the data provided. Nothing contained herein is intended or shall be deemed to be investment advice, implied or otherwise. This letter represents my views and replicates trades that I am making but nothing more than that. Always consult your registered advisor to assist you with your investments. I accept no liability for any loss arising from the use of the data contained on this letter. Options and junior mining stocks contain a high level of risk that may result in the loss of part or all invested capital and therefore are suitable for experienced and professional investors and traders only. One should be familiar with the risks involved in junior mining and options trading and we recommend consulting a financial adviser if you feel you do not understand the risks involved.

Mid-Week Technical Outlook: Oil closes below 200-day SMA

By ForexTime 

  • Crude dives over 4% in previous session
  • Prices secure daily close below 200-day SMA
  • Monthly and weekly timeframe signal further downside
  • Bears in control on D1 charts but RSI near oversold territory
  • Key levels of interest at $82, $78 and $74

Oil struggled on Wednesday after sliding more than 4% in the previous session to levels not seen since July.

The global commodity was hammered by demand concerns which provided a platform for bears to drag prices below the 200-day Simple Moving Average (SMA) for the first time in over three months.

It is worth noting that technical indicators were already in favour of bears before yesterday’s steep selloff. Oil was already respecting a negative channel on the daily charts, creating lower lows and lower highs. The daily close below the 200-day SMA may open doors to lower price levels in the short to medium term.

Zooming out to the weekly charts, we see a similar bearish picture with crude on the path to securing its third negative trading week. Prices have broken through the $80 weekly support with the next key level of interest on the W1 timeframe around $73 and $68.

Peeking at the monthly charts, the bearish candlestick created in October further supports the bearish case, signaling the possibility of lower prices to come with key monthly support found at $66.50.

Redirecting our attention back to the daily timeframe, bears are certainly in control and may use the current momentum to drag crude toward the next daily support at $74. However, the Relative Strength Index (RSI) is flirting near 30, indicating that crude may be oversold. While this could trigger a technical rebound down the road, the path of least resistance remains south.

  • Sustained weakness below the 200-day SMA may send prices towards $74 and $72.50.

  • Should prices push back above the 200-day SMA, this could spark a move back towards $82


Forex-Time-LogoArticle by ForexTime

ForexTime Ltd (FXTM) is an award winning international online forex broker regulated by CySEC 185/12 www.forextime.com

Oil and Gas Company Trading at 25% Of Book Value Production Set to Double

Source: Jeffery Hunter  (11/2/23) 

Jeffery Hunter of BullishBriefs shares his thoughts on energy company Avila Energy’s stock.

Avila Energy Corp. (PTRVF:OTCMKTS;VIK:CSE) is an overlooked opportunity trading at a steep discount to book value. After the share price was hit hard after a dramatic SPAC merger breakdown, this diversified energy company currently has a market capitalization under US$5 million, despite having total equity of US$21.3 million on the books. That means Avila Energy’s stock trades at around 25% of its book value per share of US$0.15.

With the price of Western Canadian crude oil sustaining over US$64 per barrel, now could be the ideal time to take advantage of Avila’s discounted share price. The company is focused on ramping up near-term production to capitalize on high commodity prices.

Avila currently produces approximately 570 barrels of oil equivalent per day (boe/d) from its operations in Alberta, Canada. The company plans to double production to 950-1,040 boe/d through a combination of workovers, recompletions, and new drilling. Assuming the lower end of production, US$64 WCS oil and US$3.10 natural gas, my math gives me about 8.1m in annual revenue, considerably higher than their current market cap.

To help fund this growth, Avila Energy is undertaking a US$2.2 million private placement. The capital raised will go directly toward adding barrels and increasing cash flow at a time when market conditions are favorable.

Beyond conventional oil and gas production, Avila Energy is making moves into the clean energy space. The company is developing carbon capture and sequestration technology to reduce the emissions from its upstream operations. Avila is also launching a Vertically Integrated Energy Business using patented micro-turbine technology.

This micro-turbine technology enables modular power generation for homes and businesses. By selling the power directly to consumers, Avila can establish a stable recurring revenue stream. The company estimates each customer could generate around US$500 per month on average.

Avila Energy is positioning itself for the global energy transition. Through a balanced mix of oil and gas production and clean energy sales, the goal is to achieve carbon neutrality by 2024 and net zero emissions by 2027.

With fossil fuel production providing steady cash flow and clean energy initiatives driving future growth, Avila aims to become a unique diversified energy provider. The company has the team and vision to bridge the gap between traditional and renewable energy.

Trading at just a fraction of book value, with near-term production set to double and a pivotal move into clean energy, Avila Energy offers substantial upside for investors. With the CEO owning a whopping 28% of outstanding shares, the opportunity is compelling for those who see the long-term potential in the strategic transition Avila is undertaking.

 

Important Disclosures:

  1. As of the date of this article, officers and/or employees of Streetwise Reports LLC (including members of their household) own securities of Avila Energy Corp.
  2. Jeffery Hunter: I determined which companies would be included in this article based on my research and understanding of the sector.
  3. Statements and opinions expressed are the opinions of the author and not of Streetwise Reports or its officers. The author is wholly responsible for the validity of the statements. The author was not paid by Streetwise Reports for this article. Streetwise Reports was not paid by the author to publish or syndicate this article. Streetwise Reports requires contributing authors to disclose any shareholdings in, or economic relationships with, companies that they write about. Streetwise Reports relies upon the authors to accurately provide this information and Streetwise Reports has no means of verifying its accuracy.
  4.  This article does not constitute investment advice. Each reader is encouraged to consult with his or her individual financial professional. By opening this page, each reader accepts and agrees to Streetwise Reports’ terms of use and full legal disclaimer. This article is not a solicitation for investment. Streetwise Reports does not render general or specific investment advice and the information on Streetwise Reports should not be considered a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Streetwise Reports does not endorse or recommend the business, products, services or securities of any company.

For additional disclosures, please click here.

What is a virtual power plant? An energy expert explains

By Daniel Cohan, Rice University 

After nearly two decades of stagnation, U.S. electricity demand is surging, driven by growing numbers of electric cars, data centers and air conditioners in a warming climate. But traditional power plants that generate electricity from coal, natural gas or nuclear energy are retiring faster than new ones are being built in this country. Most new supply is coming from wind and solar farms, whose output varies with the weather.

That’s left power companies seeking new ways to balance supply and demand. One option they’re turning to is virtual power plants.

These aren’t massive facilities generating electricity at a single site. Rather, they are aggregations of electricity producers, consumers and storers – collectively known as distributed energy resources – that grid managers can call on as needed.

Some of these sources, such as batteries, may deliver stored electric power. Others may be big electricity consumers, such as factories, whose owners have agreed to cut back their power use when demand is high, freeing up energy for other customers. Virtual power sources typically are quicker to site and build, and can be cleaner and cheaper to operate, than new power plants.

Virtual power plants are more resilient against service outages than large, centralized generating stations because they distribute energy resources across large areas.

A growing resource

Virtual power plants aren’t new. The U.S. Department of Energy estimates that there are already 30 to 60 gigawatts of them in operation today. A gigawatt is 1 billion watts – roughly the output of 2.5 million solar photovoltaic panels or one large nuclear reactor.

Most of these virtual power plants are industrial customers that have agreed to reduce demand when conditions are tight. But as growing numbers of homes and small businesses add rooftop solar panels, batteries and electric cars, these energy customers can become not only consumers but also suppliers of power to the grid.

For example, homeowners can charge up their batteries with rooftop solar when it’s sunny, and discharge power back to the grid in the evening when demand is high and prices sometimes spike.

As smart thermostats and water heaters, rooftop solar panels and batteries enable more customers to participate in them, DOE estimates that virtual power plants could triple in scale by 2030. That could cover roughly half of the new capacity that the U.S. will need to cover growing demand and replace retiring older power plants. This growth would help to limit the cost of building new wind and solar farms and gas plants.

And because virtual power plants are located where electricity is consumed, they’ll ease the burden on aging transmission systems that have struggled to add new lines.

New roles for power customers

Virtual power plants scramble the roles of electricity producers and consumers. Traditional power plants generate electricity at central locations and transmit it along power lines to consumers. For the grid to function, supply and demand must be precisely balanced at all times.

Customer demand is typically assumed to be a given that fluctuates with the weather but follows a fairly predictable pattern over the course of a day. To satisfy it, grid operators dispatch a mix of baseload sources that operate continuously, such as coal and nuclear plants, and more flexible sources such as gas and hydropower that can modulate their output quickly as needed.

Output from wind and solar farms rises and falls during the day, so other sources must operate more flexibly to keep supply and demand balanced. Still, the basic idea is that massive facilities produce power for millions of passive consumers.

Virtual power plants upend this model by embracing the fact that consumers can control their electricity demand. Industrial consumers have long found ways to flex their operations, limiting demand when power supplies are tight in return for incentives or discounted rates.

Now, thermostats and water heaters that communicate with the grid can let households modulate their demand too. For example, smart electric water heaters can heat water mostly when power is abundant and cheap, and limit demand when power is scarce.

In Vermont, Green Mountain Power is offering its customers incentives to install batteries that will provide power back to the grid when it’s needed most. In Texas, where I live, deadly blackouts in 2021 highlighted the importance of bolstering our isolated power grid. Now, utilities here are using Tesla Powerwalls to help turn homes into virtual power sources. South Australia aims to connect 50,000 homes with solar and batteries to build that country’s largest virtual power plant.

Virtual power, real challenges

Virtual power plants aren’t a panacea. Many customers are reluctant to give up even temporary control of their thermostats, or have a delay when charging their electric car. Some consumers are also concerned about the security and privacy of smart meters. It remains to be seen how many customers will sign up for these emerging programs and how effectively their operators will modulate supply and demand.

There also are challenges at the business end. It’s a lot harder to manage millions of consumers than dozens of power plants. Virtual power plant operators can overcome that challenge by rewarding customers for allowing them to flex their supply and demand in a coordinated fashion.

As electricity demand rises to meet the needs of growing economies and replace fossil fuel-burning cars and furnaces, and reliance on renewable resources increases, grid managers will need all the flexibility they can get to balance the variable output of wind and solar generation. Virtual power plants could help reshape electric power into an industry that’s more nimble, efficient and responsive to changing conditions and customers’ needs.The Conversation

About the Author:

Daniel Cohan, Associate Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rice University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Crude oil bears dominate the scene

By ForexTime 

  • Crude oil under pressure on D1 timeframe
  • H4 timeframe confirms that bears are in control
  • Keep eye on Parabolic SAR and MACD
  • Three potential bearish targets identified on H4 chart
  • If the 83.94 level broken, H4 bearish scenario invalidated

Oil prices remain dominated by bears on the daily timeframe as the global commodity creates a lower top followed by a lower bottom.

This represents a downtrend that could send prices toward the weekly support level of 80.45. However, bulls have the potential to jump back into the scene by starting a correction wave with their goal none other than the weekly resistance level at 84.47.

The H4 chart confirms that the bears are in charge with a downtrend in progress. Bulls started a correction wave in the downtrend with both the Parabolic SAR indicator and the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) oscillator sanctioning this direction.

Attaching a modified Fibonacci tool to a trigger level near the last lower bottom at 81.46 and dragging it close to the top of a large bearish candle at 83.94, three possible targets can be established:

  • The first possible target is at 80.71 (Target 1), just before a weekly support level. This target will help with risk management.

  • The second price target is likely at 78.72 (Target 2) if the bears can break through the weekly support level.

  • The third and last price target is feasible at 76.99 (Target 3).

If the price at 83.94 is broken, this scenario is no longer relevant.


Forex-Time-LogoArticle by ForexTime

ForexTime Ltd (FXTM) is an award winning international online forex broker regulated by CySEC 185/12 www.forextime.com

Brent Crude Holds Ground Around $90 Amid Geopolitical Tensions and Future Expiries

By RoboForex Analytical Department

Brent crude is maintaining a steady position, trading close to $89.50 as the market endeavors to find a balance.

Middle Eastern tensions remain the central focus for traders, as the on-ground operations in the region have introduced multiple uncertainties that can sway prices.

Adding to the mix of factors influencing Brent crude this week is the expiration of December Brent futures. This expiration could lead to short-term volatility and impact prices accordingly.

Recent data from Baker Hughes indicates that the number of active oil rigs in the U.S. is on the rise. This week saw an increase of two units, bringing the total to 504 rigs. This growth marks the third week in a row of expansion.

Technical Analysis: Brent Crude

Brent has witnessed a corrective move to the $86.50 mark and is currently crafting an upward trajectory targeting $89.50. Should prices successfully surpass this resistance, we might witness a rally towards $93.20, and potentially even further to the $95.00 mark. The MACD on this timeframe solidifies this bullish sentiment. With its signal positioned below the zero line, it’s on an upward trajectory, hinting at possible future highs.

On the hourly frame, Brent has wrapped up a bullish wave reaching $89.36, succeeded by a minor pullback to $87.90 earlier today. The stage appears set for a subsequent bullish move, aiming for the $89.50 resistance. Breaking above this level could potentially unlock the door to $92.50. The Stochastic oscillator on this timeframe amplifies this bullish stance. Its signal, currently below the 20 mark, is pointed sharply upwards, suggesting a possible rally to the 80 level.

Disclaimer

Any forecasts contained herein are based on the author’s particular opinion. This analysis may not be treated as trading advice. RoboForex bears no responsibility for trading results based on trading recommendations and reviews contained herein.