Is the LONG Wait Soon to Be Over for Azarga Uranium?

Source: Peter Epstein for Streetwise Reports   10/22/2020

Peter Epstein of Epstein Research wonders if investors’ patience with U.S.-focused Azarga Uranium will finally be rewarded.

Azarga Uranium Corp. (AZZ:TSX; AZZUF:OTCQB) has been battling to obtain the permits, licenses and approvals to construct a world-class in-situ recovery (ISR) uranium operation in South Dakota for over a decade. I’ve been both supportive and optimistic on uranium fundamentals and on Azarga for four years.

Local opposition has slowed the process down, but in December 2019, the company eliminated the last remaining contention on its U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) license at the 100%-owned Dewey Burdock (DB) project. Now, the company remains focused on obtaining final U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) permits.

In August 2020, management arranged funding for the financial assurance bonds required by the EPA. This is a critical step in advance of the final EPA permits being issued. With the NRC license in place and EPA permits thought to be imminent, a number of institutional investors, as well as strategic and financial partners, could drive the valuation higher.

Today’s share price of CA$0.18 is 28% below its April 2020 high of CA$0.25. To be fair, the entire sector has sold off as the underlying uranium price declined from $34.25/lb to ~$30/lb, despite industry fundamentals that, arguably, have never been better.

Peers Energy Fuels Inc. (EFR:TSX; UUUU:NYSE.American), Ur-Energy Inc. (URG:NYSE.MKT; URE:TSX), Denison Mines Corp. (DML:TSX; DNN:NYSE.MKT), Fission Uranium Corp. (FCU:TSX; FCUUF:OTCQX; 2FU:FSE), Global Atomic Corp. (GLATF:OTCMKTS) and GoviEx Uranium (GXU: CSE) are down between 25%–40% from 52-week highs.

However, very few (if any) uranium juniors have as impactful a news release hanging over them as Azarga does. It seems reasonable to wonder if the share price could surpass its 52-week high upon finally reaching this long-awaited stage of being granted final EPA permits for DB.

Of course, we’ve seen this movie before, right? I’ve been expecting this development to unfold for a long time. Importantly though, I don’t believe that management has ever deceived me. CEO Blake Steele has always been open with me about the challenges and timing uncertainties.

The company has had advisors, consultants and lawyers working with it on DB virtually every step of the way. CEO Steele and his board have listened to the experts, and their efforts could pay off fairly soon.

Here I am again, suggesting that the long wait could soon be over. The market cap has languished in the CA$30 million (CA$30M) range, currently at CA$34M. If Azarga can show line of sight toward getting DB into production in the next three years, what might the company potentially be worth?

The after-tax, preliminary economic assessment (PEA)-derived, net present value (NPV)(8%) of Dewey is $147M = CA$195M. Azarga is trading at 17.5% of its NPV. That’s pretty cheap, again assuming that DB could be up and running within three years.

Three U.S.-focused peers, UR-Energy, Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC:NYSE.MKT) and Energy Fuels trade at enterprise values of CA$111 to CA$271M (average = CA$206M). All should be interested in partnering with Azarga on DB, or acquiring Azarga outright for its larger portfolio of Western U.S. uranium assets in South Dakota, Wyoming and Colorado.

Cameco Corp. (CCO:TSX; CCJ:NYSE) has three uranium operations in the area. To the extent these companies have deposits or projects near DB, there might be meaningful synergies to gain with Azarga.

In the chart below, notice that at Dewey’s base-case, long-term uranium price assumption of $55/lb, its internal rate of return (IRR) is 55%. Compare that to the average of eight similar-stage peers; $58/lb and an IRR of 31.8%. The current long-term contract price is $35/lb.

This means Azarga might possibly be able to sign a five-year contract for a portion of its nameplate capacity at a price that most global peers would not, or could not, accept.

Readers are reminded that of the $31.7M of upfront capital needed, $20–$25M could probably be raised in debt. Of the remainder, some might potentially be satisfied with an upfront payment on an off-take agreement with a utility.

Even more impressive is that Dewey’s NPV divided by its upfront capex is 5.4x. This is very strong for any mining project, not just in the uranium sector. The average NPV/capex ratio of peers is 1.2x. This is perhaps the biggest differentiating factor between Azarga and other juniors, including dozens not in the chart.

Even at a long-term uranium price assumption of $45/lb, which I believe we could see within 12–24 months, DB’s IRR is 37% (still above the average of peers). However, at $45/lb, the average IRR among peers falls to 20%–25%. Several names in the chart might not be financeable at $40¬–$45/lb uranium.

It’s worth noting that of the many dozens of preconstruction uranium projects across the globe, the vast majority cannot possibly deliver commercial quantities within three years. Time to market matters, and DB is looking at fairly near-term production.

Another observation is that DB is in the U.S., a place I believe will be better to operate a mine in than countries like Argentina, Zambia or Niger.

But wait, the story gets even more interesting. In addition to a robust PEA, there are up to three potential satellite deposits that could feed the DB project: Dewey Terrace, Gas Hills and Aladdin. Once Azarga gets over the permitting hurdle, these satellite deposits will instantly become more valuable.

Having millions of additional pounds of uranium available to enhance the DB project might make a meaningful difference to the economics depicted in the PEA. Instead of 14 years of operation at 1.0M lbs/year, perhaps 15–20 years at 1.5 to 2.0M lbs/year will be contemplated.

Once Azarga Uranium clears the final hurdle, a number of investment catalysts will present themselves. Preliminary discussions on off-take agreements with utilities would be launched. Lining up debt funding for construction would be aggressively pursued. More earnest talks with prospective strategic/financial partners would take place.

Importantly, management could probably sell off a modest interest (15%–20%?) of the DB project to cover 100% of its funding needs through cash flow positive operations.

All eyes are on Azarga Uranium, and the uranium price in coming months. Will investors’ patience finally be rewarded?

Peter Epstein is the founder of Epstein Research. His background is in company and financial analysis. He holds an MBA degree in financial analysis from New York University’s Stern School of Business.

Disclosures: The content of this article is for information only. Readers fully understand and agree that nothing contained herein, written by Peter Epstein of Epstein Research [ER], (together, [ER]) about Azarga Uranium, including but not limited to, commentary, opinions, views, assumptions, reported facts, calculations, etc. is not to be considered implicit or explicit investment advice. Nothing contained herein is a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell any security. [ER] is not responsible under any circumstances for investment actions taken by the reader. [ER] has never been, and is not currently, a registered or licensed financial advisor or broker/dealer, investment advisor, stockbroker, trader, money manager, compliance or legal officer, and does not perform market making activities. [ER] is not directly employed by any company, group, organization, party or person. The shares of Azarga Uranium are highly speculative, not suitable for all investors. Readers understand and agree that investments in small cap stocks can result in a 100% loss of invested funds. It is assumed and agreed upon by readers that they will consult with their own licensed or registered financial advisors before making any investment decisions.

At the time this article/interview was originally posted, Peter Epstein owned stock options in Azarga Uranium and the company was an advertiser on [ER].

Readers should consider me biased in my view of the Company. Readers understand and agree that they must conduct their own due diligence above and beyond reading this interview. While the author believes he’s diligent in screening out companies that, for any reasons whatsoever, are unattractive investment opportunities, he cannot guarantee that his efforts will (or have been) successful. [ER] is not responsible for any perceived, or actual, errors including, but not limited to, commentary, opinions, views, assumptions, reported facts and financial calculations, or for the completeness of this interview or future content. [ER] is not expected or required to subsequently follow or cover events and news, or write about any particular company or topic. [ER] is not an expert in any company, industry sector or investment topic.

Streetwise Reports Disclosure:
1) Peter Epstein’s disclosures are listed above.
2) The following companies mentioned in the article are billboard sponsors of Streetwise Reports: Azarga Uranium. Click here for important disclosures about sponsor fees. Please click here for more information. The information provided above is for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
3) Statements and opinions expressed are the opinions of the author and not of Streetwise Reports or its officers. The author is wholly responsible for the validity of the statements. The author was not paid by Streetwise Reports for this article. Streetwise Reports was not paid by the author to publish or syndicate this article. Streetwise Reports requires contributing authors to disclose any shareholdings in, or economic relationships with, companies that they write about. Streetwise Reports relies upon the authors to accurately provide this information and Streetwise Reports has no means of verifying its accuracy.

4) The article does not constitute investment advice. Each reader is encouraged to consult with his or her individual financial professional and any action a reader takes as a result of information presented here is his or her own responsibility. By opening this page, each reader accepts and agrees to Streetwise Reports’ terms of use and full legal disclaimer. This article is not a solicitation for investment. Streetwise Reports does not render general or specific investment advice and the information on Streetwise Reports should not be considered a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Streetwise Reports does not endorse or recommend the business, products, services or securities of any company mentioned on Streetwise Reports.
5) From time to time, Streetwise Reports LLC and its directors, officers, employees or members of their families, as well as persons interviewed for articles and interviews on the site, may have a long or short position in securities mentioned. Directors, officers, employees or members of their immediate families are prohibited from making purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market or otherwise from the time of the decision to publish an article until three business days after the publication of the article. The foregoing prohibition does not apply to articles that in substance only restate previously published company releases. As of the date of this article, officers and/or employees of Streetwise Reports LLC (including members of their household) own securities of Azarga Uranium, a company mentioned in this article.