“Market Manipulation” Is Not Why Most Traders Lose

A look at EWI president Robert Prechter’s requirements for successful trading

By Elliott Wave International

How often have you heard analysts refer to a down day on Wall Street as “traders taking profits”? Sounds great, but the sobering fact is that most traders — in futures, commodities, or forex — lose money.

Any book on trading will list for you the many reasons why most traders lose. Yet some traders do win; some even set records. In 1984, Elliott Wave International’s founder and president Robert Prechter won the U.S. Trading Championship, setting a new all-time profit record of 444.4% in a monitored real-money options account. Later in his monthly Elliott Wave Theorist, Prechter published a Special Report “What A Trader Really Needs To Be Successful” with 5 important insights for would-be market speculators (including the explanation of why “market manipulation” is not why most traders lose.)

Here’s a quick excerpt — and to read Prechter’s Special Report in full, free, look below.

“What A Trader Really Needs To Be Successful” (excerpt)
By Robert Prechter

Ever since winning the United States Trading Championship in 1984 (see footnotes, p.4), subscribers have asked for a list of “tips” on trading, or even a play-by-play of the approximately 200 short term trades I made while following hourly market data over a four month period. Neither of these would do anyone any good. What successful trading requires is both more and less than most people think.

In watching the reports of each new Championship over the past three years, it has been a joy to see what a large percentage of the top winners have been Elliott Wave Theorist subscribers and telephone consultation customers. (In fact, in the latest “standings” report from the USTC, of the top three producers in each of four categories, half are EWT subscribers!) However, while good traders may want the input from EWT, not all EWT subscribers are good traders. Obviously the winners know something the losers don’t. What is it? What are the guidelines you really need to meet in order to trade the markets successfully?

When I first began trading, I did what many others who start out in the markets do: I developed a list of trading rules. The list was created piecemeal, with each new rule added, usually, following the conclusion of an unsuccessful trade. I continually asked myself, what would I do differently next time to make sure that this mistake would not recur? The resulting list of “do’s” and “don’ts” ultimately comprised about 16 statements. Approximately six months following the completion of my carved-in-stone list of trading rules, I balled up the paper and threw it in the trash.

What was the problem with my list, a list typical of so many novices who think they are learning something? After several months of attempting to apply the “rules,” it became clear that I made not merely a mistake here and there in the list, but a fundamental error in compiling the list in the first place. The error was in taking aim at the last trade each time, as if the next trading situation would present a similar problem. By the time 16 rules are created, all situations are covered and the trader is back to square one.

Let me give you an example of the ironies that result from the typical method of generating a list of trading rules. One of the most popular trading maxims is, “You can’t go broke taking a profit.” (The brokers invented that one, of course, which is one reason that new traders always hear of it!) This trading maxim appears to make wonderful sense, but only when viewed in the context of a recent trade with a specific outcome. When you have entered a trade at a good price, watched it go your way for a while, then watched it go against you and turn into a loss, the maxim sounds like a pronouncement of divine wisdom. What you are really saying, however, is that in the context of the last trade “I should have sold when I had a small profit.”

Now let’s see what happens on the next trade. You enter a trade, and after just a few days of watching it go your way, you sell out, only to stare in amazement as it continues to go in the direction you had expected, racking up paper gains of several hundred percent. You ask a more experienced trader what your error was, and he advises you sagely while peering over his glasses, “Remember this forever: Cut losses short; let profits run.” So you reach for your list of trading rules and write this maxim, which means only, of course “I should NOT have sold when I had a small profit.”

So trading rules #2 and #14 are in direct conflict. Is this an isolated incident? What about rule #3, which reads, “Stay cool; never let emotions rule your trading,” and #8, which reads, “If a trade is obviously going against you, get out of the way before it turns into a disaster.” Stripped of their fancy attire, #3 says, “Don’t panic during trading” and #8 says, “Go ahead and panic!” Such formulations are, in the final analysis, utterly useless.

What I finally desired to create was a description not of each of the trees, but of the forest. After several years of trading, I came up with — guess what — another list! But this is not a list of “trading rules”; it’s a list of requirements for successful trading. Most worthwhile truths are simple, and this list contains only five items. …

Read the rest of Prechter’s report now, free! Here’s what you’ll learn:

  • Why a trading method is a “must” for your success
  • What part discipline plays in your trading success
  • Why “market manipulation” is not why most traders lose
  • How to gain trading experience
  • More

Keep reading this free report now.

This article was syndicated by Elliott Wave International and was originally published under the headline “Market Manipulation” Is Not Why Most Traders Lose. EWI is the world’s largest market forecasting firm. Its staff of full-time analysts led by Chartered Market Technician Robert Prechter provides 24-hour-a-day market analysis to institutional and private investors around the world.

 

 

Monetary Policy Week in Review – 24 Dec 2011

The past week in monetary policy featured decisions from 8 central banks around the world from Europe to Africa.  Those that changed interest rates were; Sweden -25bps to 1.75%, Hungary +50bps to 7.00%, and Russia -25bps to 8.00%.  Meanwhile, those that announced no changed to interest rates were; Morocco 3.25%, Japan 0.10%, the Czech Republic 0.75%, Ghana 12.50%, and Turkey 5.75%.  Brazil also announced some fine tuning measures to the way it pays interest on reserves, effectively further loosening monetary policy settings.


Many of the central banks which met over the past week made mention of and are particularly wary about the ongoing European sovereign debt crisis, and uncertainty on the global economic growth outlook.  Below are listed some of the key quotes from the central banks that announced monetary policy decisions:

  • Central Bank of Russia (cut rate 25bps to 8.00%): “The said decision was made considering the assessment of inflation risks and risks to the sustainability of economic growth, including those associated with the global economic uncertainty. Narrowing of the gap between interest rates on the Bank of Russia liquidity providing and absorbing operations is neutral in terms of monetary policy stance. It should contribute to restraining money market rates volatility and strengthening of the interest rate channel of monetary policy transmission to inflation.”
  • Hungary (increased rate 50bps to 7.00%): “The Monetary Council decided to raise the base rate by 50 basis points in view of increased perceptions of the risks associated with the economy and upside risks to inflation. If risk perceptions and the outlook for inflation deteriorate significantly further, it may prove necessary to raise interest rates again.”
  • Sweden (cut rate 25bps to 1.75%): There is still considerable uncertainty regarding the public-finance problems in, above all, the euro area and several euro countries are expected to implement more stringent fiscal tightening than was previously assumed. Growth in the euro area is therefore expected to be low in the period ahead. However, the global economy as a whole is growing at a relatively good rate.”
  • Bank of Japan (held rate at 0-0.10%): The pick-up in Japan’s economic activity has paused, mainly due to the effects of a slowdown in overseas economies and of the appreciation of the yen.  As for domestic demand, business fixed investment has been on a moderate increasing trend and private consumption has remained firm.  On the other hand, exports and production have remained more or less flat, due in part to the effects of the slowdown in overseas economies and of the yen’s appreciation as well as of the flooding in Thailand.  Improvement in business sentiment has slowed on the whole despite steady improvement in domestic demand-oriented sectors.”

There is no major central bank activity scheduled for next week.  Happy holidays to all our loyal readers, and may the new year bring you prosperity and happiness.

Investment Ideas for 2012

Dec. 23 (Bloomberg) — Paul Hickey, co-founder of Bespoke Investment Group, Neel Kashkari, head of global equities at Pacific Investment Management Co., and Charles De Vaulx, portfolio manager at International Value Advisers LLC, talk with Bloomberg Television about investment ideas for 2012. Jacqueline Novogratz, chief executive officer for Acumen Fund, and Steve LeBlanc, senior managing director for the Teacher Retirement System of Texas, also speak. (Source: Bloomberg)

Central Bank of Russia Cuts Rate 25bps to 8.00%

The Central Bank of Russia dropped its benchmark refinancing rate by 25 basis points to 8.00%.  The Bank said: “The said decision was made considering the assessment of inflation risks and risks to the sustainability of economic growth, including those associated with the global economic uncertainty. Narrowing of the gap between interest rates on the Bank of Russia liquidity providing and absorbing operations is neutral in terms of monetary policy stance. It should contribute to restraining money market rates volatility and strengthening of the interest rate channel of monetary policy transmission to inflation.”

The Russian central bank previously left 
interest rates unchanged, while it last raised the fixed overnight deposit rate by 25bps to 3.50% in May, and the benchmark refinancing rate by 25 basis points to 8.25% in April this year.  Russia reported annual inflation of 6.8% in November, 7.2% in September and October, down from 8.2% in August, 9% in July, and 9.4% in June, meanwhile Bank Chairman Sergey Ignatiev is trying to keep inflation between 6% and 7%.  


Russian economic growth was recorded at 5.2% y/y in Q3 this year, compared to 3.4% in Q2, 4.1% in Q1, and 4.5% in the December quarter of 2010; the IMF is expecting 4.5% growth for the full year.  The Russian Ruble (RUB) has weakened about 2% against the US dollar this year, while the USDRUB exchange rate last traded around 31.20

www.CentralBankNews.info

AT&T and Dish Network: M&A Match Made In Heaven?

AT&T and Dish Network: M&A Match Made In Heaven?

by Mike Kapsch, Investment U Research
Friday, December 23, 2011

AT&T (NYSE: T) created a stir on Wall Street last month when its nine month pursuit to acquire Deutsche Telekom AG’s (PINK: DTEGY) T-Mobile for $39 billion epically failed.

The deal could have catapulted AT&T to the top spot of the telecommunications industry… knocking out current champ – Verizon (NYSE: VZ).

But instead, the botched trade only left AT&T on the hook to hand $1 billion of its own broadband spectrum over to Deutsche Telekom and an additional $3 billion for backing out of the deal. (Note: Opposition from the FCC and the Justice Department were the main reasons the deal was cut short.)

And that’s very unfortunate… Because boosting AT&T’s spectrum was the only reason it wanted to buy T-Mobile in the first place.

Now The Wall Street Journal reports, “AT&T has said it faces a potentially crippling shortage of airwaves, or spectrum, as customers clog the network with video and music downloads to their iPhones and tablet computers. Yet, without the T-Mobile deal it has few remaining options to help bolster its capacity.”

So how can AT&T quickly recoup its spectrum losses and get back on track? The solution may lie in Dish Network (Nasdaq: DISH)…

The Dish on Dish Network

With a $12 billion market cap and a solid price-to-earnings ratio of just 8, Dish Network has recently become a potential takeover/merger target for the telecom industry. For the past few years, it has stockpiled $3 billion worth of wireless spectrum in the hopes it will soon begin expanding its business in the telecom space.

Yet with so many major players in the industry already, its unlikely Dish can become telecom’s next big thing on its own. In fact, Dish even knows this. That’s why it’s hoping to partner up with a telecom provider to get its foot in the door as an alternative.

AT&T looks like a perfect fit. But there’s one problem….

During AT&T’s T-Mobile fiasco, Dish was one of AT&T’s main critics.

And even though Dish and AT&T would certainly benefit each other by joining forces… they currently see each other more as direct competitors than partners.

A chance for big profits may soon change that though…

The Telecom Industry’s Spectrum Scramble

All five of the major telecom players – Verizon, AT&T, Sprint (NYSE: S), MetroPCS (NYSE: PCS), and T-Mobile – admit they’ll need more spectrum within the next three years. Currently, Verizon is estimated to have as much as 56 percent more spectrum than its closest competitor AT&T.

But Dish Network could change all of that. Forbes reports, “AT&T could quickly gain a sizeable lead over Verizon by buying Dish Networks or Dish’s spectrum.”

Plus, as an added bonus, AT&T likely wouldn’t have to worry about all the regulatory issues it ran into trying to buy T-Mobile.

According to Tim Farrar, an analyst at TMF Associates, “Dish doesn’t have an operating wireless network so there are none of the same concerns about competition [as the T-Mobile deal].”

Will AT&T and Dish squash their egos and join forces for the better part of their businesses?

Only time will tell. But investors will certainly want to keep a close eye on this potential takeover/merger in 2012.

Good investing,

Mike Kapsch

Article by Investment U

Chatwell Says ECB Buying Makes Bunds Favored Investment

Dec. 23 (Bloomberg) — Peter Chatwell, a fixed-income strategist at Credit Agricole SA, discusses the outlook for German bunds as the European Central Bank buys government debt of other euro-zone nations. He speaks from London with Mark Barton on Bloomberg Television’s “On the Move.”