The Online Forex Trading System – Don’t Fight the System

By Forex Mansion

An online forex trading system trades automatically on your behalf. The automated online forex trading systems can constantly monitor various markets simultaneously and perform trades. The systems are preprogrammed to trade according to the parameters set by the use. Automatic systems can trade any time of day at any pace.

Online forex trading systems are not just for traders who don’t know how to trade on their own. The benefits of automated systems for even the most experienced trader are readily apparent. The clearest advantages of online computerized systems are 24-hour-a-day trading, multimarket trading, varied calculations, and their lack of human emotion:

• The automated systems can trade all day long. From 20:15 on Sunday to 22:00 on Friday (GMT) the system is online and running. The system can constantly monitor the market non-stop. Even the best traders have to take their eyes off the screen at some point in the day. The online system never sleeps. The systems, according to the settings preprogrammed by the trader himself, will always be ready for any trade opportunity that may arise at any time.
• The forex trading systems can market all the markets simultaneously. This enables the trader to diversify investments over varied geopolitical arenas. Investment diversification is a necessity to protect against risk while maintaining for speculative gain.
• The programs also generally contain numerous mathematical chart analysis theories and financial formulas that can all be calculated at once. This provides the trader with a broader picture of market trending and more accurate predictions for reversals.
• Even the best and most experienced traders are still fallible humans. Emotion can get in the way of good decision making. The psychological pressures involved with trading can sometimes push somebody to buy or sell at just the wrong moment. Online forex trading systems never succumb to psychological or emotional pressures because they are essentially robots.

However, it should always be stressed that online systems are not meant to work alone. Behind the system stands a trader. This cooperation is important for many reasons including setting parameters, monitoring progress, reacting to news, and introducing the human element:
• The automated systems operate according to preprogrammed settings. Therefore, as a beginning step, there needs to be a trader who will instruct the system what to trade, how, and set it on course.
• A computer program is unlikely to make mistakes, but when dealing with real money, it is always important to monitor the progress of the system and make sure that everything is copasetic.
• The computer programs are very advanced, but not advanced enough to predict or react to current events. Therefore, whenever events occur that affect the markets being traded in, it is crucial for the human to reset the parameters of the trading in accordance with the aftereffects of the event that occurred.
• As much as the machine has the advantage of removing the disadvantageous sides of the human element, such as succumbing to emotional weaknesses, nevertheless, there is no replacement for a good trader’s intuition. Therefore, it is crucial that there always remain a degree of human involvement.

It is the proper cooperation of the human trader in complement with the online forex trading system that will get the best trade results and achieve great profitability.

More Forex and Stocks Day Trading information from the industry’s best forex brokers can be found here http://www.forexmansion.com.

About the Author

This article will explain how an online forex trading system is the perfect complement for any trader by optimizing trading to maximize profits.

E-Mini Trading: Is Your Trading a Business or a Hobby?

By David Adams

E-mini trading draws a wide variety of individuals who have differing motives for entering the trading business. On the other hand, most individuals enter the business seeking added income and financial security. To be sure, many individuals consider e-mini trading a “get rich quick” type of business and plunge headlong into trading with gusto, and usually disappointment.

I want to make the thesis of this article clear from the start; if you want to make a living in the e-mini business you must treat your trading as a full-time job. Over the years, I have watched hundreds of traders employ a variety of unusual approaches to succeeding in the e-mini trading business, usually unsuccessfully. For example:

• Waking up at 11 o’clock ready to trade until the session close. I start trading at 6 AM CST ready to trade. I do take an extended lunch during the “stand down period” from 11:30 AM CST to 12:45 PM CST; during these times the action can be sluggish and unproductive.
• Some traders have days when they just don’t feel like trading. I hear this often. Of course, if a trader had a normal job they would not take a couple of days off every week cause they just didn’t feel like working.
• Many traders enter the e-mini trading arena with little or no training and hope for positive results. This can happen on a regular basis, even when the students are enrolled in and organized course to learn to trade the e-mini contracts. In lieu of reading the material and mastering some of the trading techniques, they come to the trading room in hopes of “picking up” trading techniques from the instructor or other students. It doesn’t work that way.
• One great way to fail is to perform only the minimum requirements. Don’t do any additional reading on e-mini contracts, don’t subscribe to trading publications, don’t keep abreast of current economic and trading news; just show up and hope for the best.
• I find many traders schedule personal appointments during prime trading hours without consideration of the effect their absence will have on their business. When possible, I schedule doctor’s appointments and other similar unavoidable appointments during the lunch hour or after 3 PM CST so that I can avoid trading interruptions.

There are a plethora of other reasons why brand-new e-mini traders fail, but failing to put forth a maximum effort in your fledgling business is a tragic mistake. My point is a simple one, if you open any sort of business, you would keep regular hours and keep your shelves fully stocked and go the extra mile to please your customers and suppliers. For whatever reason, this level of dedication is sorely lacking in the e-mini trading business. In my estimation, the majority of entry-level e-mini traders give it the “old college try” in hopes of success.

Successful businessman carefully plan their marketing strategy, work long hours, and go the extra mile to assure their success. I can’t imagine a new businessman starting a business with a halfhearted attitude and coming to work when it seems convenient to do so. I want to reiterate my point; treat your e-mini trading business as a full-time job and devote the effort one would expect from an individual starting a new career. Notice I use the word career, not job. Trading can never be considered a run-of-the-mill job because of the extraordinary amount of effort it takes to attain success and continue that success; when you start an e-mini trading career, you have embarked on a career path, not a dalliance to fritter away a few meaningless years.

In summary, I have stressed the importance of treating the e-mini trading business has a full-time career and stressed the importance of devoting a solid effort into your success. Because you are essentially your own boss in this business, it is easy to schedule unproductive activities during periods of time when you should be actively trading. In short, nothing less than a maximum effort in both time and workload can lead you to profitability. Keep this in mind next time you cancel an afternoon trading session to play golf or run errands.

About the Author

Real Live Trading Doesn’t Lie. Spend several days in my trading room and see if you can benefit from a fresh and unique view on trading e-mini contracts. Sign up for your free trading experience by clicking here

E-Mini Trading: The Difference between the 90% and 50% Failure Rate

By David Adams

In my e-mini trading room I get to see a variety of new and experienced students trade their accounts. Oddly enough, experienced students who are looking for an e-mini trade room usually meet with the least success. When I speak with these students, I often find that they have taken numerous trading courses with minimal success. On the other hand, students with minimal training in my trading room enjoy similar success as the experienced traders who have taken a multitude of e-mini trading courses. The reason for the disparity in the success lies in past e-mini trading instructors and the effort the student put forth in learning a particular trading course.

That’s a bit of an anomaly, isn’t it?

The intent of this short article is not to enumerate specific courses that are of high quality and other courses that are of lesser quality; the strengths and effectiveness of training courses run the gamut of effectiveness. No, my intent is to stress finding a system that works and then learning that system so well that you can trade it instinctively. Like many e-mini trading educators, I find it frustrating when I have a student fail. It is my intention to train students to trade the e-mini contracts successfully. In a sense, their failure becomes my failure.

On the other hand, every student has the responsibility to familiarize and thoroughly learn the methodologies and techniques presented in an e-mini trading course and the accompanying e-mini trading room. Without a certain level of mastery of methodology and e-mini technique, the student’s chances for success diminish greatly. There is, in fact, a dual responsibility by both the e-mini trading instructor and student to effectively learn and convey the basic principles of the e-mini course trading style.

Lacking that dual responsibility, most new e-mini traders are destined to fail and e-mini educators feel the pain of failure. In short, this is the difference between a 90% fail rate and a 50% fail rate. I have to concede at this point that at least half of all potential e-mini traders will find the trading profession unduly demanding or tedious. Another group of students do not care to spend the day parked in front of a computer screen. These are all normal reasons that students will leave an e-mini trading program. Trading isn’t for everyone, and there is nothing to change that immutable fact.

But the focus of this particular article is the amount of effort that both the instructor and student must expend to reach a level of consistently profitable trading. This is no small feat considering the wide-ranging level of information traders are required to assimilate. In short, surveying the level of technical information can seem, at first, daunting and discouraging. Like most areas of study though, a concerted effort by the student and consistent support by the e-mini trading instructor will result in the potential for positive results. As I mentioned earlier, the failure of either instructor or student to exert strenuous and ongoing effort will leave a gaping hole in the student’s technical and methodological skill level.

In summary, we have discussed the dual role both students and e-mini instructors play in the game of successful e-mini trading. A lack of effort on either partner in this “contract of learning” can result in a highly unsatisfactory result. As a student, choosing a responsive and helpful instructor and time-tested system is essential, but the student also must be willing to provide maximum effort in achieving his or her goals. Trading is not a profession where instincts and natural ability will necessarily lead to success.

Students with minimal training in my trading room enjoy similar success as the experienced traders who have taken a multitude of e-mini trading courses. The reason for the disparity in the success lies in past e-mini trading instructors and the effort the student put forth in learning a particular trading course.

About the Author

Real Live Trading Doesn’t Lie. Spend several days in my trading room and see if you can benefit from a fresh and unique view on trading e-mini contracts. Sign up for your free trading experience by clicking here

How to Start CFD Trading

By Nicholas Dockerty

Before you can start Trading in Contracts for Difference (CFDs), it is important that you have all the necessary tools to help you do this. This is very important because if you do not have the correct tools, you will put yourself at a disadvantage, which could see you miss out on profits. One of the first things that you need to do is understand how the stock market works, as well as to have knowledge about the stock you are interested in placing a CFD on.

The reason why it is important to understand the stock market is because you would be looking to place either a long position or a short position, depending on which way the market is moving. Markets also play a very big role in helping us understand investor sentiment.

The next important thing is to make sure you have done your research on the company or stock that you are going to trade on. By doing this, you will know whether or not the company is in a strong financial position. It is also important to know how to identify where the stock price may reverse, allowing you to more accurately choose a long or short position. Many investors often follow the trends of the stock or market, when they should be trying to find where these trend reversals will take place. These two points are crucial to know before you get started with your CFD trading. The next port of call will be to find a suitable CFD broker or trader who can execute your trades.

There are two types of accounts that you can open. The first will be an execution only account, whereby you will choose which stocks you want to place CFDs on, and what kind of position it will be. You should use this kind of account if you are confident in your trading abilities. In most cases, the trades will be done via the Internet, so it is advisable that you have a connection that allows you access to trade CFDs online at any time. Because this kind of account is more of a do-it-yourself type, the charges or commissions should be lower than that of an advisory account.

The other type of account will provide you with a broker, who will advise you on different strategies and tips on what stocks you should consider placing a CFD on. Other services that they offer would include keeping an eye on your account, making sure that they get you in and out of the trade at the best possible times so as to maximize your profits. Contact with your broker will be through e-mails, telephone and in some cases text messages, so that you are always informed. This kind of service may have higher charges and higher commissions than an execute only account. This is particularly useful for you if you do not have confidence or you are not familiar with the ins and outs of the stock market. However, you will always have the last say as to what you want done.

In both cases you will need to open an account and place a deposit (margin) in order for your broker to place the trades. Different brokers or accounts will require different amounts to open the account with. Find out what the margin policies are, as they can change at any time. It is also up to you to maintain your account with sufficient funding.

About the Author

For more information visit Australia’s number one CFD provider: www.igmarkets.com.au.

Always remember that trading CFDs can result in losses as well as profits, so make sure you fully understand the risks involved.

Central Bank Meeting Calendar Launched

Central Bank News has just launched a central bank meeting calendar; compiling the scheduled monetary policy meeting dates of 25 of the world’s central banks for the rest of 2011 on a single page.  The central banks featured in the table span the key developed market banks such as the US Federal Reserve, the ECB, and also features many key emerging market central banks such as the Banco Central do Brasil, Bank Indonesia, and others.  The central bank monetary policy meeting calendar complements the other central banking resources available on the Central Bank News website.

The launch of the central bank calendar follows on from the global central bank interest rate table, and the inflation targets table.  Along with those resources and the central bank website directory, an additional table on currency regimes has also been added to the site.  Central banks are often tasked with managing the stability of their currency, or even using it as a key tool e.g. Singapore, so it’s only natural to feature a table of countries with their currency name, ISO code, and type of exchange rate regime.  Frequent visitors to the website can expect continued development and refinement of central banking resources, as Central Bank News becomes the go-to site for central banking news and intelligence.

www.CentralBankNews.info

Monetary Policy Week in Review – 16 July 2011

The past week in monetary policy was dominated by Asian central banks, with the central banks of Japan, Indonesia, Thailand, and South Korea all announcing interest rate decisions.  The only banks to adjust interest rates were Thailand +25bps to 3.25%, and Kenya, which dropped its discount window rate -175bps to 6.25%.  Meanwhile those that held interest rates unchanged were: Japan 0.10%, Indonesia 6.75%, Latvia 3.50%, South Korea 3.25%, and Chile 5.25%.  Elsewhere in monetary policy and central banking, Brazil‘s central bank announced further policy measures to curb speculation on its currency, the Real.


While inflation remained a threat for most of the central banks who reviewed monetary policy settings during the week, for many the focus was squarely on the downside risks to both domestic and global growth.  Indeed a couple of the banks pointed specifically to the tail risks in the form of the European sovereign debt crisis.  For those that held rates unchanged, for the most part the messaging was positive, with some viewing inflationary pressures as somewhat contained, while many presented a positive outlook on their domestic economy.

As per usual, following is a selection of key quotes from central bank monetary policy statements and media releases from the past week:

  • Bank of Japan (held interest rate at 0.10%): “Japan’s economic activity is picking up with an easing of the supply-side constraints caused by the earthquake disaster.  After declining sharply following the earthquake, production has recently shown clear signs of picking up with the easing of supply-side constraints.”
  • Bank Indonesia (held interest rate at 6.75%): “Bank Indonesia views that the current BI Rate level is still in line with the effort to maintain stronger economic activities supported by stability, amid domestic excess liquidity and continued large capital inflows… Meanwhile, inflation is estimated to be under control and could be lower than earlier forecasted if there is no Government policies regarding energy prices while the supply and distribution of basic foods are well maintained.”
  • Bank of Thailand (increased interest rate 25bps to 3.25%): “In light of the continued risks to inflation amid robust domestic demand, the MPC deemed it necessary to continue increasing the policy rate to maintain economic stability and anchor inflation expectations… Inflationary pressure remained high due to elevated energy prices and continued upward adjustments in the prices of prepared foods.”
  • Bank of Korea (held interest rate at 3.25%): “The Committee expects the high level of inflation to continue in the coming months, driven largely by demand-side pressures resulting from the underlying uptrend in economic activity and by inflation expectations.”
  • Banco Central de Chile (held interest rate at 5.25%): “Domestically, output, demand and labor market figures are progressing with strength, showing signs of moderation in line with the baseline scenario in the last Monetary Policy Report.  Annual CPI inflation indicators have hovered around 3%, while measures of core inflation remain bounded. Private inflation expectations show a decline, although some of them remain above the target.”

As for next week the Reserve Bank of Australia (19th of July), and the Bank of England (20th of July) will release the minutes from their most recent monetary policy meetings, meanwhile the following central banks are scheduled to review interest rates:

  • Canada (Bank of Canada) – expected to hold at 1.00% on the 19th of July
  • Brazil (Banco Central do Brasil) – expected to increase rate 25bps to 12.50% on the 20th of July
  • South Africa (South African Reserve Bank) – expected to hold at 5.50% on the 21st of July
  • Turkey (Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey) – expected to hold at 6.25% on the 21st of July

Source: www.CentralBankNews.info

Article source:  
http://www.centralbanknews.info/2011/07/monetary-policy-week-in-review-16-july.html

What if the U.S. Fails to Reach Debt Limit Deal?

Most analysts believe U.S. lawmakers will ultimately arrive at an agreement to lift the $14.3 trillion debt limit in time to avoid defaulting on upcoming interest and debt payments. And just in case the two sides need a little encouragement or reminder of the potential consequences should they fail to arrive at a deal, Moody’s Investors Services and Standard & Poor’s have both served notice that the U.S. is under credit review pending the outcome of the discussions.

The warnings come as representatives from both the Democrats and the Republicans continue to hammer out an agreement to pave the way for the government to borrow beyond the existing debt limit. The Treasury Department has named August 2nd as the deadline, warning that failing to act before this date will leave the country without sufficient funds to meet upcoming debt obligations. After this date, the government will effectively be broke and have no option but to default.

On Wednesday, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke used part of his appearance before the Senate Banking Committee to encourage federal lawmakers to get a deal done before the Treasury Department’s cut-off date. Bernanke told the committee that should the Treasury default, the action would send “shockwaves” throughout the global economy.

But what if a deal is not made in time? What would Bernanke’s “shockwaves” look like?

For starters, America’s credit rating would immediately be downgraded to reflect the new “default” status. The government would still have to borrow to cover its operational deficit but with the loss of it’s triple-A rating, borrowing costs would increase dramatically – assuming historical lenders including China, Japan, and Britain would still be willing to bankroll the country. The alternative would be a combination of steep tax hikes and deep spending cuts to cover the shortfall.

The increased costs for the government to borrow money would soon trickle-down to the consumer level thereby increasing the cost to borrow money for everything from dishwashers to automobiles. The implications this would have on an already nervous consumer goes without saying but there is little doubt the economy would soon be heading for another recession.

As cash becomes scarce, banks may become unwilling – or perhaps unable – to lend as institutions with cash may simply “go to ground” in an attempt to ride out the storm just as they did during the credit crunch that helped spark the last recession. Global stock markets would certainly fall and savers would in short order find their investments decimated.

For now, the prevailing belief is that U.S. lawmakers will do what is necessary to avoid a default. There is just too much at stake to allow politics to trump reason.

However, even if the debt ceiling is lifted in time to prevent a default, there will almost certainly not be a comprehensive plan outlining the steps the U.S. will take to close the deficit and eventually tackle the debt. A “business as usual” approach will no longer be received favorably by investors who are looking for more clarity on how the U.S. intends to deal with its chronic budget shortfall.

For this reason, and even if a default is avoided next month, there is still a possibility that investors will demand higher yields in future bond auctions due to the higher risk now associated with U.S. debt.

 Scott Boyd is a currency analyst and a regular contributor to the OANDA MarketPulse FX blog

7-15-11 MTS Video: July Expiration

Danny Rileys – Mr Top Step talks about the July expiration in the S&P options on the CME floor. Riley says “The expiration is slightly weighted to the put side” that from 1310 to 1350 there are 24k calls (open interest) and on the put side from 1310 to 1270 there are 35k puts.

Why Oil Companies Hate Me

oil industryNote from Managing Editor Sara Nunnally: Oil prices are up again today…

As our government inches ever closer to defaulting on our debt, oil companies are raking in the profits. They know our government’s got their back — no one’s going to touch those billions of dollars in tax breaks for the oil industry.

That’s why, instead of our regular Smart Investing Daily article, I want to share with you a very important letter from our executive publisher Sandy Franks.

Fair warning… what you’re about to read will make you angry at and disgusted with the oil industry.

But this isn’t just a rant about high gas prices. This is a call to action — to take a stand against oil and government cronyism. Their “friendship” is costing us billions of dollars in debt and tax dollars, while they sit on billions in profits.

So please, take five minutes to read this letter from Sandy.


Why Oil Companies Hate Me

Most people would describe me as friendly, happy-go-lucky and easy to get along with… and while those statements might be true, there’s one thing that makes my blood boil: the oil industry.

And I can guarantee you that oil companies soon won’t have too many nice things to say about me. In fact, they’re probably going to hate my guts.

How can I be so sure? Because my new book, Barbarians of Oil, is now officially released to the public. And it’s going to turn BIG OIL inside out.

Now I admit, barbarian isn’t normally a word associated with oil companies, particularly Big Oil companies. I’m not just talking about OPEC either. Everyone knows the story of how these Arab oil barons have held us hostage for years.

Here’s the thing. When it comes to oil, there are no “good guys” in the petroleum business. Whether the companies are American, Canadian, Venezuelan or Arab, the oil industry is full of barbarians.

Once you read Barbarians of Oil, I think you’ll agree with me. Not only that, but I hope you’ll call, write or email the congressman and legislators in your area and tell them you’ve had enough of Big Oil’s dirty deeds.

If they don’t listen to you, then tell them you’re going to vote them out of office. In fact, in this letter, I’ll tell you exactly what to say to your legislator.

But first let me tell you why…

Big Oil Companies Are Not Your Friend

Look up the word “barbarian” in a thesaurus and you’ll find upward of 30 synonyms, all of them grim. Among the standouts are savage, brute, hooligan, thug, wrecker, destroyer and cannibal.

Make no mistake. Oil companies ARE savage, ruthless hooligans. They are deliberately destroying American prosperity… but more importantly, your prosperity.

What’s so awful is that most people have no idea how oil companies have purposely hoodwinked us into thinking oil is the ONLY source of energy we need.

Oil companies want you to think that alternative energy sources such as wind, solar, geothermal and others are just too expensive to use or won’t be enough to satisfy our growing energy demands.

But that’s simply not true. Look, I’m not a tree hugger by any means. And global warming… well, I haven’t seen enough evidence to be 100% convinced it’s not simply Mother Nature wreaking havoc on temperatures worldwide.

Yet there’s one thing I’m convinced beyond a shadow of a doubt: That it’s entirely possible we could reduce our dependency on oil… especially foreign oil.

Other countries are already showing us how to do just that. In Barbarians of Oil, you’ll learn about a little island off the coast of Denmark that gets 100% of its energy needs from renewable sources.

That’s right… 100% of its energy needs come from renewable sources. But have you heard about this island’s success? Not likely.

The name of the island is Samso Island. And what this island has done could completely change your view on the oil industry forever. And believe me, that’s the last thing the oil industry wants. They want to keep you in the dark.

The bottom line is this: The less you know about the truth, the more you become a victim of their costly game. They don’t want success stories like Samso Island getting out to the public.

But let me take a minute right now to share a little of the island’s story with you. Believe me, you’ll be shocked how residents of this island banded together and told…

Big Oil to Take a Hike

Once unknown to many people, Samso Island has now become a popular tourist destination. The tourists are there not only to enjoy the popular music festivals, sailing activities and the beautiful beaches, but also to see firsthand how the island won the title as the world’s first 100% renewable energy state.

What do I mean by renewable energy? Well, simply that the island found ways to create energy for things like electricity, heating homes and driving vehicles without using a single ounce of petroleum. Essentially what the island residents did is tell Big Oil to shove it.

You see, back in 1997 Denmark (which Samso is part of) held a national competition for a one-of-a-kind experiment. The winner would be expected to convert all of its energy supply to 100% renewable within 10 years.

Because Samso is an island that has no conventional energy resources of its own, it was the ideal choice for such a controlled experiment. So in 1998, Samso began converting its energy into renewable energy sources.

Of course, the biggest challenge for island residents was transforming their transportation needs into renewable sources. The island government, with the residents’ blessing, enacted a ban on all traditional combustion engines. Why? Well, because combustion engines require the most amount of petroleum.

The island began investing in hydrogen power plants. Using excess electricity from the wind farms they built, the islanders use hydrogen to fuel their vehicles. Sorry, Exxon, no place to sell your bloodstained $5 gas here.

Another project in the works to reduce vehicle fuel needs is using rapeseed oil in place of petroleum. Rapeseed oil is extracted from the seeds and then filtered. Once filtered, it is stored for use in vehicles, including tractors.

You see, tractors use an astonishing amount of diesel, and by replacing it with homemade rapeseed oil, farmers save a lot of money and the island further reduces its dependency on petroleum.

What’s more, the goal to achieve renewable energy independence has created higher-paying jobs and boosted the standard of living for all residents. And get this: Residents take pride in their energy independence.

There’s no doubt what Samso Island has done is truly remarkable. And you can read all about it in Chapter 21 of Barbarians of Oil.

Sure, Samso Island is small and not as populated as the U.S. I’m not suggesting we could achieve what Samso has done and have all our energy needs be 100% renewable. But what their story shows is that it is possible to reduce our dependency on foreign oil.

After all, if a little island can do this, we should be able to do a heck of a lot more than we’ve done over the years to wean ourselves from And yet here’s the sad thing about their story. Experts from different countries around the world have noticed their efforts and are flocking to the island to talk to the local government and residents to see how they can use these ideas in their own countries.

Countries other than the U.S., that is. Nope, here in the U.S. it’s a different story altogether. Oil industries, backed by our very own government, want very little to do with renewable or alternative energy sources. For them, it’s all about keeping us addicted to oil.

A Costly and Ugly Addiction

Let me ask you a question. How much is “too much” to pay for a barrel of oil?

Some experts argue that $80 is a reasonable price, especially when you consider that in July 2008 oil reached $145 a barrel.

But given the crisis that continues to unfold in the Middle East, it’s possible oil could spike to 2008 levels or, worse yet, go much higher.

In fact, with the protests in Egypt, the cost of oil began to rise sharply. And with increased violence in Libya, prices spiked from around $86 to over $100 per barrel.

While you and I may not be buying barrels of oil, unfortunately every time oil prices climb so does the price of gasoline. That’s because crude oil accounts for about 55% of the price of gas.

Recently prices at the pump have been rising rapidly. In less than three weeks, the national average for the price of one gallon of regular gas rose to $3.79. And if you live in California, you’re paying about $4 for a single gallon of gasoline.

Could prices go higher? Absolutely. Yes, we’ve seen a slight correction in gas prices. But the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) admits that motorists will likely see further increases since the recent increase in crude oil prices has not yet been fully passed through to gasoline prices.

How much more could prices go up? The EIA expects the price of regular-grade gasoline will be roughly 77 cents per gallon higher than it was in 2010.

That doesn’t sound like a lot of money. But here’s the thing. Every time gas prices go up, that puts a dent in your bank account.

Karen Harbert, president and CEO of the Institute for 21st Century Energy, when addressing the economic pain rising gasoline prices inflict on American families, said, “The average American household is expected to spend $2,800 on gasoline this year.”

That’s represents about a 45% spike in expenses to drive yourself back and forth to work… to go to the grocery store to get food… or to take your kids to school. That’s a lot of money to put out each year to drive your car.

What’s worse is that driving isn’t necessarily a luxury. Many of us live in rural areas of the country with no easy access to public transportation. So having a car is the only choice of transportation available, forcing a lot of Americans to be at the mercy of the oil industry.

When Is Too Much Enough?

Now let me ask you another question. If paying $5 for gas or $80 for a barrel of oil is reasonable, then how many lives sacrificed for the sake of oil are too many?

Here’s the sad truth. When it comes to lives lost, to date, 5,885 U.S. soldiers have given their lives fighting for Middle East oil. Commenting on lives lost, former President Bush once said that the outcome of the war “will merit the sacrifice.”

Have any of those lives lost saved us a cent in gas? Or helped us acquire a more secure source of oil? The answer is nothing has changed.

We are just as dependent on Middle East oil as we’ve ever been. As for those lives lost, I’m not certain that any death over oil merits the sacrifice, especially when you consider that most of the oil we use comes from countries that have created a powerful cartel against us.

Worse yet, many of those countries openly voice their hatred for America. Yet we continue to use more and more of their oil.

What most people may not realize is that the U.S. is the world’s largest consumer of oil, using about 20 million barrels every day. And get this: Most of the oil we use is imported from foreign countries.

In 2010, we imported over 4.2 billion barrels of oil at an average cost of about $79 a barrel. That means as a country we spent about $336 trillion on oil. Or to put it another way, that’s hundreds of trillions of dollars we are sending our overseas enemies.

Remember how I told you gas prices are on the rise? Well, of the petroleum we use, over 70% is solely for transportation purposes.

Yep, that’s right. Almost all of the oil we use is for getting around. Not for heating our homes. Not for manufacturing products. Nope, the largest amount is used just for transportation.

Now, don’t get me wrong. I’m not trying to put all of this on your shoulders. And I’m not trying to make you feel guilty about driving your car.

In fact, if there’s anyone to blame, it’s our government, auto manufacturers and oil companies. That’s why I call them…

A Three-Headed Monster

One of the reasons Samso Island had such success in reducing its dependency on foreign oil is that the residents had the FULL backing of their government. Unfortunately, that’s not the case here in the U.S.

The truth is, our government backs the oil industry. You know the stories of how corporations with the deepest pockets get the most votes. Well, the oil industry has some pretty deep pockets, big enough to influence Congress.

Here’s what I mean. Over the past 11 years, oil companies and their cronies have spent roughly $2 billion on lobbying activities to stop Congress from enacting regulations that would make them clean up their activities.

On top of that, the American Petroleum Institute, an organization made up of oil and energy companies, spent $11 million lobbying Congress to defeat pollution restrictions AND maintain certain industry tax loopholes. Together, that’s about $181 million a year.

The numbers could be higher. That’s because oil companies spend millions on political advertising campaigns, but they don’t have to classify them as lobbying efforts.

On top of this, oil companies that donate money to trade associations are allowed to keep that information secret. So we can’t say for sure how much money oil companies actually spend to influence members of Congress, but you can imagine, it’s a lot!

Have their lobbying efforts paid off? You bet! To date no legislation has been passed and industry tax loopholes still exist. The head of the Public Citizen’s Energy Program, Tyson Slocum, says, “Politicians routinely deliver on campaign contributions that are provided to them, by giving goodies to the industry.”

But what’s so awful about a few tax loopholes? Well, when they add up to about $35 billion a year, it’s a big deal.

Did the government give you any special tax loopholes to help you pay less in taxes each year? Did they help offset the costs of rapidly rising gas prices?

Even worse, the oil industry is using the fat profits they collect from you at the gas pump to continue lobbying for your economic demise. You can see why I call them “barbarians.” They have no compassion for your plight.

The binding ties of the oil industry to Congress run deep. For example, the oil industry has been “heavily invested” in the state of Louisiana. Louisiana Senator Mary Landrieu has received $758,000 from the industry.

There seems to be a long list of BP officials who have donated generously to Landrieu. The current president of BP America, Lamar McKay, gave $1,000 to Landrieu’s 2008 re-election campaign. Robert A. Malone, previous president of BP America, gave $2,300 to Landrieu’s campaign.

Now what’s interesting about this is that $2,300 was the campaign contribution maximum amount allowed. This means the former president of BP dumped every penny he legally could into Landrieu’s campaign.

That’s not all. Margaret Hudson, BP America’s vice president, gave $1,100. Benjamin Cannon, BP America’s federal affairs director, gave $2,300. In fact, Landrieu topped the list of members of Congress who received money from BP. In return, she’s become one of their biggest allies.

Of course it wouldn’t be fair to talk about special favors the oil industry receives without mentioning the man who provides the most favors.

Friends in High Places

The old saying “It pays to have friends in high places” couldn’t be truer for the oil industry, especially when George W. Bush was president. In 2005, Bush signed an energy bill that gave $14.5 billion in tax breaks for the industry.

Interestingly enough, at the time, Bush received more money from the oil and gas industry than any other politician.

But here’s what truly demonstrates the political connection to the oil industry. During his presidency Bush asked Vice President Cheney to head up a special task force to help develop the country’s energy policies.

Cheney recruited executives from Exxon Mobil, ConocoPhillips, Shell, BP and Chevron to sit in on his special task force. In reality, the task force was a meeting of the big oil companies to enact regulations that favored their industry.

Many of the components in the energy bill Bush signed were recommendations made by the task force. In addition to tax breaks for the industry, the task force did away with exemptions that the industry didn’t consider beneficial.

When information about the task force became public, many of the oil company officials denied they attended these meetings. In hearings held in 2005 before both the Senate Energy and Commerce committees, executives said they had not participated in meetings with Cheney or were not involved in the task force.

However, The Washington Post had obtained documents that showed otherwise:

  • On April 17, the task force met with Royal Dutch/Shell’s chairman, Sir Mark Moody-Stuart, and two other oil company executives.

  • The group met again on March 22, this time with BP regional president Bob Malone, chief economist Peter Davies and company employees Graham Barr and Deb Beaubien.

Turns out these special task force meetings were held in secrecy. On the matter, Senator Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., said, “The White House went to great lengths to keep these meetings secret, and now oil executives may be lying to Congress about their role in the Cheney task force.” You can say this is cronyism at its finest.

Big Oil’s Side Kick

So besides Congress and the president, who else aids the oil industry? If you guessed the automobile industry, you’d be right.

For years, the auto industry has dragged its feet on producing cars with higher fuel efficiency. The industry says it sells the kind of car the public wants and so far, fuel efficiency just hasn’t made it to the top of the list.

But the Consumer Federation of America says a national survey shows that most consumers support 60-mile-per-gallon (mpg) fuel economy standards.

Is it possible to make cars that achieve these kinds of fuel efficiency standards? The automobile industry would like you to think increasing fuel efficiency in cars is almost impossible.

However, a spokesperson for the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers says, “There’s no question that the technology exists or that the technology will exist to achieve these goals.”

In fact, the industry has already shown it can improve fuel efficiency. The first standards went into place in 1978. The goal was to double the 1974 passenger car fuel economy average to 27.5 mpg by 1985.

Although the standards increased to 27.5 mpg, the auto industry isn’t jumping for joy. Automakers, the ones bailed out by their friends in Washington, say that increasing fuel efficiency means costs will rise and fewer Americans will be able to buy new cars.

The industry also says that in order to build more efficient cars they will have to be made from lighter materials, reducing the weight of the vehicles, which will make them unsafe in an auto accident.

But David Friedman, engineer and director of the Union of Concerned Scientists, who has been studying these types of issues, doesn’t agree. His group designed a minivan — using the same current technology available to automakers — that achieved higher fuel efficiency and lower greenhouse emissions without altering the weight of the vehicle.

Then there’s the study done by the National Academy of Sciences in 2002, which showed that the auto industry could be making midsize SUVs that achieve 34 mpg, a minivan that gets 37 mpg, a pickup truck that gets 30 mpg, and a family car that gets 40 mpg.

Think about it like this. In 1908, when Ford introduced the Model T, it averaged about 17 mpg. Seventy-seven years later, 27.5 mpg became the average. This means automakers have managed to increase the average mpg only by as little as 0.35 for each year.

However, during that same time span we’ve seen better aerodynamics, more powerful engines, improved airbag safety and a host of other technological advances, including built-in GPS systems, Bluetooth capabilities… even cars that can parallel-park themselves. But we don’t have the technology to increase fuel efficiency?

Doesn’t make sense at all. Isn’t increasing fuel efficiency possible? I believe so. That’s why I encourage you to call, write or email your Congressman and tell them enough is enough!

It’s time we put an end to this madness. Our oil addiction is causing…

An Economic Nightmare

Look, here’s the thing. Our oil addiction, especially from countries that are unstable or at direct odds with the United States, such as Iran, adds serious cost implications to our economy.

According to the U.S. Department of Energy, disruptions in supply and sudden price hikes have cost the U.S. $7 trillion over the past 30 years. The Department of Transportation also estimates that each $1 billion of trade deficit costs 27,000 American jobs. Oil imports account for one-third of the total U.S. deficit.

The National Defense Council Foundation (NDCF), a Virginia-based research and education institution that studies the impact of the oil industry on the U.S. economy, says the direct loss of economic activity arising from U.S. oil import dependency amounts to $117.4 billion.

In addition, the NDCF found that importing oil costs 2.4 million American jobs.

The NDCF also says the United States is capable of reducing imports by 40%, but that number could reach 75% in 15 years.

James Martin, chairman of the NDCF, says, “If we do not decrease our dependency, America will see the hemorrhage of cash for oil imports grow and its enemies strengthened.”

It’s clear something has to be done to reduce our dependency on foreign oil. It’s costing you money in unfair and higher taxes. And it’s costing jobs here in the U.S.

But it’s clear you can’t rely on Big Oil to stop their barbarian ways. And obviously not even Congress or the president is willing to turn against them.

Something has to be done. That’s why I say…

Make Yourself Heard

I’m encouraging everyone reading this letter to call, write or email the legislator in your area and tell him or her to put an end to this madness. Heck, I’ll even give you a prewritten letter that you can just add your name to and then mail.

But before you do that, please get your hands on a copy of Barbarians of Oil so that you know the whole truth. You and I both know that politicians don’t like to make changes unless they are PUSHED into action.

That’s why it’s important you know every detail of the oil industry before you make that call or write your letter. All the details, including how the industry works, the favors that are bestowed upon them by Congress, the long list of oil spills that have wreaked havoc on the environment, not to mention the cost you and I pay in millions in higher taxes, the blatant disregard for the environmental damage they’ve caused in countries like Nigeria… and so much more are in Barbarians of Oil.

  • Bill Bonner, president and founder of Agora Publishing and best-selling author, says, “Outside of sex and religion, nothing is more fascinating that the story of oil. Its many effects on modern economies can scarcely be counted, let alone fully measured. In fact, oil — cheap oil — may be an essential ingredient for our standard of living as well as our style of living. Sandy Franks gives us another way to look at it… another way to understand this amazing story. Everyone should read this book.”

  • Dan Denning, author of The Bull Hunter: Tracking Today’s Hottest Investments, writes, “People have been shedding blood for oil for over 100 years now, Sandy Franks tells us in Barbarians of Oil. She and Nunnally show how the Industrial Revolution was really an Energy Revolution — with crude oil as the powerful King. And now, we learn how oil’s bloody reign could end and how investors could profit from a new era in energy.”

  • Myles Norin, CEO of Agora Publishing, writes, “Authors Franks and Nunnally have done readers a great justice in Barbarians of Oil by exposing the dishonest tricks and tactics oil companies use to hoodwink us into thinking we have no options for energy than oil. What’s worse, Washington bureaucrats and automobile manufacturers have supported their antics for decades.

“The authors show us in plain truth and mince no words that Big Oil has set us on a path of economic destruction by relying solely on oil. This is a must read, especially as oil tops $100 a barrel.”

You can order Barbarians of Oil right here, right now. Just click this link to place your order.

When you do, you’ll save about 35% off the official jacket price of $27.95. But that’s not all.

As a free bonus, I’ll also send you a prewritten letter of action you can send to your congressman or senator, asking them to stop buying foreign oil and start investing in alternative energy sources.

All you have to do to receive a copy is email a receipt for your book purchase to [email protected] with “Send book letter” in the subject line… and we’ll forward you this letter of action to tell your representative you’ve had enough!

While we may never match the success of Samso Island, we can dramatically reduce our dependency on foreign oil. Wouldn’t you like to think America, one of the greatest countries in the world, is capable of so much more?

Do you want to continue to pay $5… $6… even $7 for a gallon of gasoline? Do you want to see more soldiers die for Middle East oil?

No one does. But it will be up to you and me to make a difference. All it takes is one simple phone call, letter or email to your legislator. Don’t be a victim any longer. It’s time to tell the oil industry to take a hike!

But you must act quickly. With China emerging as the world’s second-largest superpower, how long will it be before we are in head-to-head competition with them for a barrel of oil?

Already China’s oil consumption grows by 7.5% per year, seven times faster than the U.S. With real gross domestic product growing at a rate of 8-10% a year, China’s need for energy is projected to increase by 150% by 2020.

A report by the International Energy Agency predicts that by 2030, Chinese oil imports would equal imports by the U.S. today.

Just like the U.S., China has become increasingly dependent on Middle East oil. Today, 58% of China’s oil imports come from the region. By 2015, its share of Middle East oil will stand on 70%.

And here lies the danger. China is already strengthening its strategic ties in the Middle East. Unlike the U.S., China isn’t suffering a $14 trillion budget deficit problem.

China has $2 trillion in cash reserves, enough to buy billions of barrels of oil. How long will it be before we are paying $200… even $300 for a barrel of oil?

Is that too much to pay? The answer is YES. That’s why our addiction to foreign oil must end. No matter what your political beliefs or affiliations are, don’t let the oil industry ruin American prosperity.

Take action now. Get a copy of Barbarians of Oil right away. Then email, write or call your legislator.

Let’s make a difference in our country’s future.

P.S. Standard & Poor’s has downgraded America’s debt outlook to negative. The S&P says there is material risk that U.S. policymakers might not reach an agreement on how to address medium- and long-term budgetary challenges by 2013. That downgrade shocked oil futures prices, which shot up to $121 a barrel. Time is of the essence. Please get your copy of Barbarians of Oil now.

Article brought to you by Taipan Publishing Group. Additional valuable content can be syndicated via our News RSS feed. Republish without charge. Required: Author attribution, links back to original content or www.taipanpublishinggroup.com.

{jtagstpg} {authorstpg}

{loadposition sidarticles}