Ford Reaches a Crossroads

Ford Reaches a Crossroads

by Justin Dove, Investment U Research
Tuesday, June 28, 2011

People who follow Ford (NYSE: F) were dealt a big surprise last week by some negative press.

Ford fell 18 spots to 23rd in this year’s J.D. Power and Associates 2011 Initial Quality Study.

Ford was ranked fifth last year and was the mainstream brand with fewest defects. Ford had exceeded industry averages in quality each year since 2006.

There’s no coincidence that it was also President and CEO Alan Mullaly’s first year with the company…

Mullaly’s Reputation with Boeing and Ford

Mullaly built his own strong reputation as the CEO at Boeing. Then he added to this reputation with the way he handled Ford through the recession. Ford was the only company of the “Big Three” that didn’t take federal aid and still made a profit in 2009.

Ford’s stock fell sharply in the financial crisis to as low as $1.58 per share. Since then, it’s peaked at $18.65 per share this past January, much higher than its pre-recession value that hovered around $6 per share.

So how did Ford fall so far in quality?

It appears there is an array of problems with the MyFord Touch and MyLincoln Touch systems Ford has recently rolled out. While Ford Sync helped sales and revenue, these new touchscreen systems have become a burden for the automaker over the past year.

Consumer Reports blasted the systems last December and reiterated the sentiment this month, calling the systems “cumbersome and distracting.”

Despite Touchscreen Tech Hiccups, Ford Continues Consumer Innovation

Despite the hiccups with new technology, some appear to be high on Ford over the long term:

  • According to this International Business Times article, “Responding to increasing consumer demand for mobile app use in vehicles, Ford is hiring top tech execs and engineers.” While rolling new technology too quickly hurt Ford with MyFord Touch, the company is showing strong innovation and seems to be carving out a niche for tech-savvy customers.
  • Earlier this month Ford announced it was going to vamp up its efforts overseas, especially in Asia. They claim to expect overseas sales to increase by 50 percent over the next five years. The global market has been an issue for Ford as competitors like General Motors have overtaken them in Asia and other markets.

It appears that Ford is at a crossroads. Growth has been strong, but quality slipped this year. It could be a case of Ford spreading itself too thin. Trying to innovate in technology and increase efforts abroad may have been too aggressive over the past year.

Mulally has a rock-solid track record though, and this situation will likely serve as a wake-up call to the giant auto manufacturer. Ford could continue to have a very strong decade if it can improve the implementation of new technology and reach the lofty expectations for Asia and abroad.

Good investing,

Justin Dove

Can the Fed and Economists Forecast the Future? See This Startling Chart.

Elliott Wave Financial Forecast Editors Kendall and Hochberg on economists, the Fed and forecasting
By Elliott Wave International

Business Talk Radio host Gabriel Wisdom recently spoke with Pete Kendall, Co-Editor of EWI’s Elliott Wave Financial Forecast. Their discussion included a crucial but rarely asked question about economists and the Federal Reserve. Here’s the relevant excerpt:

Gabriel Wisdom: “Ben Bernanke, the chairman of the Federal Reserve, says the economy is slowing but there’s faster growth ahead. Is he wrong?”

Pete Kendall: “Economists are extrapolationists. They tend to look at what’s happening in the economy and extrapolate that forward. So here we have a situation where not just Bernanke but economists in general are looking at… what they call the ‘soft patch’ and somehow contorting that into growth later in the year.

Pete’s startling reply flatly contradicts conventional wisdom. Most people believe that the Fed really is able to anticipate the economic future. After all, they’re the most “qualified.” But what do the facts say?

Pete’s Elliott Wave Financial Forecast Co-Editor Steve Hochberg recently included this eye-opening chart (from Societe Generale Equity Research) in his new subscriber-exclusive video, “Buy and Hold, or Sell and Fold: Where Are The Markets Headed in 2011?

Analysts Lag Reality. From 'Buy and Hold, or Sell and Fold: Where Are the Markets Headed in 2011?'

The red line in the chart is the S&P earnings, and the black line shows economists’ forecasts relative to those earnings. Here’s what James Montier, head of equity research for Societe Generale, said about it:

“The chart makes it transparently obvious that analysts lag reality. They only change their minds when there is irrefutable proof they were wrong, and then only change their minds very slowly.” (emphasis added)

That comment is spot-on. In 2002-2003, as you can see, earnings turned up despite economists’ forecasts for earning declines. It took them a while to “turn the ship around” and play catch-up with the trend.

Yet in 2007-2008, earnings turned down — despite the forecast by economists for continued increases. The devastating truth is that earnings did more than fall in the first quarter of 2008: they had their first negative quarter in the history of the S&P. As Steve said in his subscriber video, “Economists were wrong to a record degree” — and investors felt the pain.

So what’s the point? Economists do extrapolate the trend. That approach works fine, until it doesn’t­ — and you’re on the hook.

Elliott wave analysis never extrapolates trends — it anticipates them. The Wave Principle recognizes that markets must rise and fall — and that they unfold according to changes in investor psychology, in a way that is patterned and recognizable.

—–

Most people believe that the Fed really is able to anticipate the economic future. Now you know the facts. Uncover other important myths and misconceptions about the economy and the markets by reading Market Myths Exposed.

EWI’s free Market Myths Exposed 33-page eBook takes the 10 most dangerous investment myths head on and exposes the truth about each in a way every investor can understand. Download your free copy now.

This article was syndicated by Elliott Wave International and was originally published under the headline Can the Fed and Economists Forecast the Future? See This Startling Chart.. EWI is the world’s largest market forecasting firm. Its staff of full-time analysts led by Chartered Market Technician Robert Prechter provides 24-hour-a-day market analysis to institutional and private investors around the world.

5 Things Every Income Investor Needs to Know Now

By Carla Pasterna, DividendOpportunities.com

We’re sitting on the edge. This year, 2011, marks the tipping point.

Don’t worry; it’s nothing dangerous. In fact, if you’re an income investor, this might be the start of a very prosperous trend.

In 2011 the first of 75 million Baby Boomers will hit 65 — retirement years. You might be among them. This marks a major shift for millions of people that will play out over the next years and decades. And I think that it could mean soaring popularity for income investing.

In fact, my colleague Amy Calistri outlined the case in a recent Dividend Opportunities article:

“Think about it. Some estimates have this group [Baby Boomers] controlling over 80% of personal financial assets — that’s trillions of dollars. Much of that is tied up in housing and other non-liquid investments, but there are still loads of cash in traditional spots. According to the Investment Company Institute, there is $10.7 trillion in mutual funds alone. 

As Baby Boomers wind down their working years, they’re going to do what retirees before them have done — shift from riskier stocks and commodities into more buttoned-down income investments. In fact, given the rocky market over the past decade and disappearing pensions, the shift could be larger than most people think.”

This could lead to a golden age for income investing. But as attractive an opportunity this may be, there is no guarantee the graying of the Baby Boomers will simply lead to a massive bull market across all income securities. That’s why it’s still most important to select high-quality ideas. If you do this, then any broad bull market will simply be icing on the cake.

So to help you find the best high-yield plays — and maximize your returns — I’ve rounded up some of my favorite income investing tips. I use these tips personally to help guide my portfolio choices in High-Yield Investing, so no matter your experience level, they should give you an edge in finding the best income investments on the market. And if we see the big shift into income securities in the years and decades ahead, all the better.

Tip #1 – Look off the beaten path: Always remember that yield is a combination of dividends paid and share price. If prices rise, the yield on a security falls, all else being equal.

So what will happen to many of the most popular high-yield spots if millions more are looking for solid income? Their prices would likely rise, pushing yields down.

That’s why I think it’s valuable to look off the beaten path for higher yields. You have to look into the special classes of securities built for income investors. My years of researching the income field have uncovered even the most rare of these assets, including securities like business development companies, stapled products, master limited partnerships, and even exchange-traded bonds. This is where you’ll uncover truly mouth-watering yields overlooked by the majority of investors who are focused on common stocks.

Tip #2 – Dividend safety is key: For us income investors, nothing should be held in higher esteem than the safety of our dividends. After all, what’s the use of a high dividend if it’s only going to be cut a few weeks later?

But an amazing thing happens when you follow my first tip and look off the beaten path for income investments.

Common stocks are under no obligation to pay a dividend; they can cut their payments at any time if they please. But I’ve found a few securities — such as preferred stocks — that can’t change or reduce their payments. A number of other little-known securities have the same restrictions, all but guaranteeing you’ll be paid a stream of income you can count on.

Tip #3 – Use market downturns to find higher yields: Most investors look at a market downturn as a bad thing, and in fact, I would rather the market rise than fall. But I also appreciate the opportunities that appear in a downturn.

As I said, a stock’s yield is a function of its price. If a stock pays $1 per share and trades at $20, its yield is 5%. If the same stock dips to $10 per share, the yield has risen to 10%.

That’s one reason why I bought heavily during the recent market downturn — the yields became too high to ignore! If you can stomach volatility during a bear market, you’ll likely have a chance to lock in unnaturally high yields.

Tip #4 – Don’t be afraid to take a loss: High-Yield Investing subscribers always ask me when to sell their holdings. And for good reason — when you sell is just as important as when you buy.

I’m personally never afraid to take a loss. Many investors continue holding losing stocks and hope for a rebound, only to watch them sink further. I’ve seen this countless times, so I’m always sure to look at the reasons a holding is falling and if I should sell.

If the stock in general is falling with the market, I may not be worried. However, if a change in the company’s operations mean it could see rocky times ahead, I don’t want a part of it.

Tip #5 – Taxes matter: When is a lower yield more attractive than a higher yield that’s just as safe? When the lower yield is taxed at a lower rate.

Consider this: An investor in the top federal tax bracket is invested in a municipal bond that pays 6%. Because the income from this bond is tax-free, the taxable-equivalent yield is actually 9.2%! In other words, if the same investment were in a fully taxable security, our investor would have to earn 9.2% to have the same income after taxes.

It doesn’t take long for that difference to add up to serious cash.

Good Investing!


Carla Pasternak’s Dividend Opportunities

P.S. — Don’t miss a single issue! Add our address, [email protected], to your Address Book or Safe List. For instructions, go here.

How America Beats China by 2025

 


 

Think America is guaranteed to lose out to China? Think again… 

A quick survey question: Who do you think is more likely to be better off — on top of the pile, if you will — in the year 2025? America or China?

The conventional wisdom (what everybody knows) is that China is on a relentless march upward, and America has entered an era of permanent decline.

And yet, as management guru Peter Drucker once observed, “What everybody knows is frequently wrong.”

Does that mean the China transcendence prediction, and America’s guaranteed demise, could be looked on as foolishness from a future vantage point? Stranger things could happen. You never know…

To stretch your mind a little, today we will make the base case for “America triumphant” in the year 2025. Fourteen years from now, about the time so many expect Uncle Sam to be on a respirator, America could actually be doing great, even as the dragon slips on some unexpected banana peels.

To start out, let’s address a contradiction that doesn’t make a lot of sense.

On the Western side, faith in America’s leadership has hit all-time lows. (Speaking collectively here: Democrats, Republicans, the Federal Reserve, all of them.) And yet America itself still has a core so vibrant, a set of cultural ideals and can-do capabilities so strong, that the country can’t be counted out. Under the right circumstances, America can shake off weak leaders like a bad case of fleas.

On the Eastern side, faith in China’s leadership has hit all-time highs. How else do you explain investors’ belief that a fraud-wracked totalitarian state, still “command and control” oriented in so many ways, will just keep going from strength to strength?

It is a truly wacky paradox. Everything we have learned about economics, about how markets work and political systems work, points in the direction of “free markets for free men” — the culture that America used to uphold better than anyone else, and a culture the USA can re-embrace.

And yet today, countless Western world investors (who made their wealth in free-market, free-speech environments) are now putting their faith in (drum roll please) a quasi-capitalist, quasi-fascist politburo, where decisions as to what to build and where, and which articles can be run in the newspaper and which can’t, are made by connected government officials!

The assumption is that China’s top-down, authoritarian political structure will necessarily evolve toward free-market democracy as capitalism further takes hold. But that’s one heck of a big assumption, no? Perhaps in line with W.’s assumption that democracy would flourish in Iraq?

The alternative view (regarding political change) is that, even if China does not embrace “free markets for free men,” it can still succeed anyway. To this your humble editor asks: Have we learned nothing from the communists, or even the Japanese for that matter, when it comes to state-driven “command and control?”

But getting back to the “America wins by 2025” argument…

The crux of the scenario focuses on three things: food, energy and manufacturing.

First up, food: America, as you know, is an agrarian superpower. The USA is one of the largest grain exporters in the world. We grow so much food, in fact, that we can afford to burn up food in our gas tanks (in the form of cockamamie ethanol subsidies).

China, in contrast, does not have enough food, and their troubles are only going to grow worse. China as a country is wracked by devastating droughts. Their water reservoirs are both polluted and depleted, with the problem bordering on catastrophe.

So what is going to happen, then, over the next decade as China’s hunger grows (and weather patterns worsen)? If the long-run agriculture forecasts are correct, a lack of self-sufficiency in future years could be a very big problem. America will have that self-sufficiency. China won’t.

Next up, energy. Once again, a big problem for China, especially with “peak oil” kicking in (as it inevitably will over the next few years) and with the Middle East threatening to blow up (a virtually guaranteed occurrence also).

But did you know America is a major power when it comes to energy too? The USA is addicted to oil, to be sure, but there are huge quantities of another valuable, clean-burning fuel under Americans’ feet — natural gas.

Is it so hard to imagine an American energy culture switched over from oil to natural gas? A world with natgas hybrid electric cars, and natgas power plants fueling electric generator stations all across the country?

Remember, we are talking about the year 2025 here. Somewhere between now and then, the price of oil will surpass $200 a barrel, perhaps even $300, at which point the heavy infrastructure costs for switching from crude to natty will seem cheap.

But the point is, America will get through the crude oil crisis and have natural gas waiting for it on the other side, with enough abundance to support the U.S. economy (perhaps with further help from our Canadian friends). That is long-term energy security. What kind of energy security does China have?

The final point to consider is manufacturing. Over the past few years we have seen and heard a great deal about the “China price,” with China being the low-cost manufacturing outlet to the world. That reality is already fading now, as wages and input costs in China rise.

What happens to the manufacturing equation, though, if America endures a fiscal crisis of great proportion at some point in the next few years? At least two things happen. First, Americans stop buying so much from overseas exporters. Second, jobs start coming home!

Imagine America, five years from now, in the midst of true “Great Depression” conditions, with unemployment at 30%. Were this to be the case, the rest of the global economy would be in a major slump too, as the USA is worth a quarter of world GDP.

But with all those Americans out of work, what would happen to manufacturing jobs? They would start coming home! To the extent that America declines economically, the USA once again becomes a cheap labor state. Why wouldn’t corporations start aggressively moving factories back home in droves?

And by the way, for those who expect the dollar’s value to fall to zero and stay there — how does that work in a world where food and energy are scarce with the U.S. having an abundance of both? As the technology picks up, we may even be able to export gas (in the form of LNG) as well as grain at some point.

How well would grain sell to a hungry world if priced in “worthless” dollars? How quickly would manufacturing jobs return to the USA if cheap American workers were paid in dirt-cheap greenbacks?

And by the way, we haven’t even touched on America’s capacity to innovate… if someone solves the peak oil problem in a big way by engineering bacteria that eat carbon dioxide and excrete gasoline (a real project), which country do you think will pull it off? If there is a new cleantech and biotech revolution that sweeps the planet, bringing in trillions of revenue from aging humans on every continent, which country do you think will have the innovation lead?

Now, imagine fast-forwarding to the year 2025…

The great dragon, which was supposed to be dominant by now — it is 2025 remember — actually hit a series of snags beginning in late 2011, when the entire Chinese economy imploded under the weight of overcapacity and fraud. China then bounced back from this implosion, as Jim Rogers predicted it would, but quickly ran into further problems of intractable civil unrest, infrastructure problems born of “command and control,” and chronic shortages of food and energy that crippled economic output and acted as a huge brake on growth.

America, meanwhile, has once again become “a shining city on a hill” by 2025. A major fiscal crisis hit the USA hard in late 2011, as a Middle East oil spike created “rage riots” and led to inflationary collapse of the bond market. And yet, while the years 2012-2015 were very dark for the USA, an incredibly cheap dollar, coupled with the surging value of grain exports and a return of U.S. manufacturing jobs, enabled Uncle Sam to find his feet.

A vicious wave of inflation swept through the United States for most of the teens, but a new Paul Volcker stepped up in 2020 and “broke the back” of inflation once again. The benefit of all that inflationary pain was that most of America’s debt was monetized out of existence (with China and Japan caught holding the bag). By today — the year 2025 — America is reaping the fruits of new balanced budget laws, huge agricultural profits, a resurgence in home-based manufacturing, and the fruits of a cleantech/biotech new innovation boom.

Could the above not happen? Write in and tell me why it’s impossible. If China can survive near-fatal shocks to the system, as Jim Rogers predicts, then America still can too. And the underlying power of America’s institutions, coupled with potentially significant food, energy and innovation advantages, means the pain of a serious debt and inflation crisis can be endured and then overcome.

China’s food and energy shortages, on the other hand, are only set to become worse — and China’s long-run success as a quasi-capitalist command-and-control state is a dubious proposition at best, with the prospects of successful free-market handoff unknown.

Sound crazy? Write in and tell me why it’s crazy.

This isn’t so much a hard prediction, by the way, as a “thinking outside the box” exercise. So much of the commentary today is just ad nauseum repetition of the obvious party lines that it becomes dangerous to one’s health and wealth to listen to it. We must think for ourselves, and be ready for counterintuitive surprises of all kinds.

Send critiques of my “America in 2025” scenario here: [email protected].

Written by Justice Litle Taipan Publishing Group. Additional valuable content can be syndicated via our News RSS feed. Republish without charge. Required: Author attribution, links back to original content or www.taipanpublishinggroup.com. 

The New Defensive Stock of the Decade

Jared LevyThings have gotten rough in the financial markets. Investors are looking for the next “safe haven” stock. And I’ll show you how you can buy it for 10% less than where it’s trading at!

Let’s look at why investors are looking at defensive stocks right now.

When times get tough, investors start to eye traditional defensive companies like Johnson & Johnson (JNJ:NYSE), Clorox (CLX:NYSE), Pfizer (PFE:NYSE) and Procter & Gamble (PG:NYSE). Utility and energy companies like Exelon (EXC:NYSE) and Exxon Mobil (XOM:NYSE) also attract investors when the future looks murky.

Tobacco and alcohol giants like Phillip Morris (PM:NYSE) and Diageo (DEO:NYSE) tend to come into favor, too, because consumers take up more bad habits when they are experiencing hardships in a down economy.

Usually defensive companies like these increase in popularity after the market has had a bullish run and a slowdown seems like the next step of the economy. Investors see these defensive stocks as a “safe haven.” But even though they are considered defensive, these stocks can and will drop in value.

In fact in 2009, many of these defensive stocks lost nearly as much of their value as the major market indexes! That’s not really defensive, is it?

What About America’s Situation Now?

We are supposedly emerging from a recession, but economic data doesn’t look so rosy. Do you really want to put your money into traditional defensive sectors like food and energy, or even “vice” companies that only seem to be safe havens?

What if I told you about a “defensive” stock that could outperform traditional safe havens? And what if I told you that you could buy this stock at a 10% discount?

I want to tell you about a company that creates an extremely strong, positive bond between citizens that is tough as nails. It provides an escape from stress, encourages creativity, individuality and is a symbol of freedom and the American way of life still yearned for around the world.

Oh and by the way, it is making TONS of money, offers a small dividend and is somewhat “green.”

Harley-Davidson, a Defensive Alternative

In this marketplace, you have to think outside the box. I always say you should invest in what you know. Since I have been riding, repairing and building motorcycles since I was five, I can tell you that this is an area I know a lot about!

I think of Harley-Davidson (HOG:NYSE) as a slightly older, tanned Apple computer, wearing leather chaps with a couple tattoos. How’s that visual for ya?

Harley-Davidson has created an obsessive culture that reveres, collects and lives to ride its products since 1903. I’ve ridden all over North America and Europe, and I can tell you that the obsession is still strong.

When I ride to Sturgis, Laconia, Daytona, Myrtle Beach, Austin and Laughlin, Nev., cities that host the largest bike rallies in the U.S., the majority of the bikes there are Harleys… and no two look the same.

They are dependable, high quality, sexy and command respect! That is hard to come by when you’re a biker.

Harley-Davidson does have competition and from time to time fads and custom bike builders gain popularity, but Harley still manages to reinvent itself time and time again. Its tried and true machines remain not only relevant, but dominant.

Recently, the company has streamlined its business to improve profitability and just reported a 10% rise in retail sales (year over year) along with a 74% rise in 1Q profits compared to last year.

Many are looking to Harley-Davidson for continued growth.

Middle-Class Stress Relief

The world’s middle class is growing at a breakneck pace. More men and women around the world now have disposable income to buy “toys.” You see, my belief is that we all need an escape from time to time to keep ourselves sane. Spending thousands on a five-day vacation is nice… but spending fifteen thousand on a machine that can provide you with hundreds of mini vacations over the years makes more sense to me.

It’s much easier and more practical to hop on your Harley after a bad day at work and take a spin, rather than to plan a full-blown vacation.

They are not all fun and games; motorcycles also offer practical, pleasurable daily transportation and are much easier to park in dense areas.

Did I mention they get great gas mileage?

Harley-Davidson knows that its bikes are a mini vacation on two wheels and the company is going after customers globally.

According to several sources, Harley is looking to open dealerships in Ahmedabad, Chennai and Kolkata, India, by the end of 2011, offering premium, inexpensive bikes. It already operates high-end dealerships in Delhi, Mumbai, Bangalore and Hyderabad. India, like China, is fast creating a middle class.

Harley also operates its own financing arm, bringing would be riders one step closer to the rumbling of their V-twin engines.

Taking a Ride

The motorcycle may be one of the last youthful freedoms left on Earth (at least in my eyes). I cannot tell you what it’s like to experience the world on two wheels in the open air, taking in the sights and smells of the countryside. I’ve experienced unusual kindness, generosity and wonderment from most of the world on my Harley.

It’s a feeling that you can only get by being on one, and I believe that once you do, you are hooked for life. Harley knows this too and markets the “lifestyle” heavily.

Over the past couple weeks, the market has been correcting. But Harley has been moving higher and has broken ABOVE its 200-day moving average. I call that pretty darn defensive.

It may not be a traditional defensive stock, but Harley is worth a look. It’s a stock that I believe will thrive through these uncertain times.

Of course if there is a complete meltdown, no stock will be safe, but that is the risk you take as an equity investor. By the way, I showed Smart Investing Daily readers how to spot key sell signals.

Buy HOG for a 10% Discount

As an options trader, I would be remiss if I didn’t show you a cool, simple tactic that you can use to buy HOG for $34.75, when it’s trading at $38.25.

For the option traders out there…

The cash secured put is a great way to acquire stock. If you are bullish on HOG, you can sell the August 36 put for $1.25. This means that you are obligated to BUY the stock at $36 a share until August 19 and getting paid $1.25 per share to do so.

Every put contract you sell obligates you buy 100 shares, so remember to set aside 100 x $36 or $3,600 for each put. The cool thing is that the $1.25 credit you get is yours to keep! So if you are buying stock at $36 and getting $1.25 (per share) you are only paying $34.75 for a share of Harley!

If the stock manages to stay above $36 by the time these contracts expire on Aug. 19, you simply keep the $1.25 for a 3.5% return! If the stock is below $36 on that date, you will be the proud owner of the stock.

But again, while everyone is buying it at $38.25, you’ll own shares of Harley at $34.75, an automatic gain of 10%!

P.S. While the technique I outline may sound complicated, it is not. I made my living off of trades just like this one. Now that I have created a reliable stream of income, I spend my time teaching others and showing them the vast opportunities that exist in this little-understood realm.

To see how I do it and to learn if it is something you may be interested in, take a minute to read my latest report.

Article brought to you by Taipan Publishing Group. Additional valuable content can be syndicated via our News RSS feed. Republish without charge. Required: Author attribution, links back to original content or www.taipanpublishinggroup.com.

{loadposition sidarticles}

{jtagstpg} {authorstpg}

Other Related Sources:

  • How to Protect Yourself From the Inflate-a-Rally
  • Harley-Davidson Shares Up On ‘Short-Term Buy’ Rating
  • Which Signals Tell You That the Market Is About to Drop?
  • Shell’s FLNG Breakthrough

    Shell’s FLNG Breakthrough

    by Tony D’Altorio, Investment U Research
    Tuesday, June 28, 2011

    Most Investment U readers are aware of a new technology, developed in the United States, that’s transforming the global natural gas industry.

    New technology that has made natural gas located in difficult areas economical to extract. And has resulted in a glut of natural gas in the United States along with sharply lower prices over the past two years.

    Now, as pointed out by my IU colleauge David Fessler, a major event is about to occur in the liquefied natural gas industry.

    Liquefied natural gas (LNG) satisfies 10 percent of global gas demand today. And that percentage is growing, making this is an event definitely worth revisiting…

    Shell’s Floating Liquefied Natural Gas Breakthrough

    Royal Dutch Shell (NYSE: RDS.A) is developing a new technology for use in Australia. So far, the company has spent $500 million and 15 years’ worth of research on its development.

    This breakthrough – floating liquefied natural gas terminals – will enable Shell to recover natural gas from offshore fields that were previously considered uneconomical to develop. As mentioned in David’s article, much of Australia’s gas lies buried in offshore fields.

    Shell’s Floating Liquefied Natural Gas (FLNG) Prelude facility is certainly impressive.

    • It’ll be the world’s largest offshore facility, at 600,000 tons and six times larger than the largest aircraft carrier.
    • Prelude will begin service in 2016, moored approximately 125 miles off the coast of northwestern Australia, atop a major gas field in the Browse Basin.

    Shell’s general manager for FLNG, Neil Gilmour, says that the gas field contains more than 100,000 billion cubic feet of discovered, but undeveloped, gas. This is an astronomical number, and is equivalent to about five times U.S. annual natural gas consumption.

    Shell believes that the Prelude field is just one of a number of giant offshore gas fields around the globe, waiting to be tapped by the right technology.

    Shell estimates that globally, nearly 300,000 billion cubic feet of natural gas is sitting offshore. The company says this is an extremely conservative estimate, which excludes small- and mid-sized fields, and fields that could exist in the polar regions.

    FLNG – The Future of The Global LNG Industry

    These numbers highlight natural gas and LNG’s potential to shape the world energy stage in the years ahead.

    Most conservative estimates call for LNG demand to increase at a rate of five percent a year over the next decade. More aggressive estimates say a double-digit annual increase is possible. Either way, there’s an enormous demand for gas, which makes LNG a growth industry worth investing in.

    There are other companies besides Shell that realize the potential of FLNG technology. Its Prelude facility won’t be alone for long.

    Other companies are moving ahead with similar, albeit smaller, projects. For example, Petrobras (NYSE: PBR) and other companies are issuing tenders to three contractors to bid on engineering and construction for an FLNG project off the coast of Brazil.

    Another believer in FLNG is Andrew Pearson from the energy research group Wood Mackenzie. Of Shell’s Prelude, he said, “This is a key milestone in the development of the LNG business. This will change the business.”

    Robin West, Chairman of PFC Energy, goes even further. He thinks FLNG is the future of the global LNG industry. He believes that most planned LNG facilities will not be built and that the industry will move rapidly toward FLNG.

    If so, Shell, with its lead over its peers, stands to benefit the most.

    Especially if what Shell’s Neil Gilmour envisions comes true…

    He thinks the industry will follow the same path as the floating oil production ship business. From one ship in 1997, there are now some 150 of these ships deployed globally.

    Look for the FLNG industry to follow a similar path of expansion in the decade ahead.

    Good investing,

    Tony D’Altorio

    Swiss Consumption Indicator Rises in June

    printprofile

    Switzerland’s UBS AB investor and financial services company based in Zurich released its consumption indicator this morning at 7:00 GMT. The indicator, which represents the level of a composite index made of data from five consumer-based economic indicators, revealed mild growth in consumer optimism and spending.

    The indicator’s growth level was minor in comparison to other data which has resulted in its muted impact on today’s market. The news that consumption is rising in the European heavy-weight is a bullish note in these bearish days. Analysts have digested the news to represent a forecast of higher retail sales in the coming months, which may help Switzerland regain some of last month’s economic losses.

    Read more forex trading news on our forex blog.

    British Macro Data Suggests Economic Stagnation

    printprofile

    The British economy released several reports this morning which appear to have underlined recent concerns of a flattening-out in market activity in the second quarter of 2011. Final GDP for the UK came in right at the expected level of 0.5% growth, dismal by any standard.

    Additionally, the economy’s Current Account, a measure of the difference between imports and exports, revealed a widening trade deficit, well beyond market forecasts. Economists had anticipated a steadying of the deficit near 5 billion UK pounds, but the actual figure showed an expansion of the deficit to 9.4 billion pounds.

    A revised reading on business investment, however, did give minor cause for optimism, showing that business activity did not contract as much as previously assumed. The data was still bearish in overall investment activity, but the declining speed of contraction is a ray of light on an otherwise gloomy day for Britain.

    Read more forex trading news on our forex blog.

    German Consumer Climate Report Reveals Growing Optimism

    printprofile

    A recent survey by the GfK Group, one of the world’s leading market research organizations, revealed a burst of optimism in Germany regarding its present financial situation. The monthly survey is a leading indicator of consumer confidence and often carries a moderate impact on market forecasts.

    Today’s reading, which not only beat expectations but actually grew beyond last month’s survey results, suggests that consumer fears of economic stagnation are beginning to abate. The mild uptick in consumer risk appetite was enough to give the EUR a small boost in earlier trading, but the currency has so far failed to maintain its recent support.

    Read more forex trading news on our forex blog.

    Sleepers in the E-Commerce Boom

    Sleepers in the E-Commerce Boom

    by Justin Dove, Investment U Research
    Tuesday, June 28, 2011

    E-commerce is one of the few areas of constant growth in the United States these days. It’s the reason Wal-Mart (Nasdaq: WMT) wants to unseat Amazon (Nasdaq: AMZN) as the leader in online retail sales.

    Check out what the first-quarter 2011 comScore report had to say about online retail sales:

    • Online retail sales totaled $38 billion in the first quarter of 2011. This marks a 12 percent rise over the first quarter of 2010.
    • It is the sixth straight quarter with positive growth over the previous year and the second consecutive quarter with double-digit growth over the previous year.
    • The number of online buyers increased by seven percent.
    • The transactions per buyer increased by nine percent.
    • The dollars per transaction fell by four percent, meaning people are purchasing a wider array of products.

    These growth trends are expected to continue. Especially when fuel isn’t getting any cheaper. As gas prices continue to rise over the long term, consumers will look to save money on transportation and buy more products online.

    U.S. Online Retail Sales - Projected 2009 - 2014

    (Courtesy: Tech Flash, Forrester Research)

    And while companies like Walmart and Amazon will continue to rank in profits, there is another class of winners that not many people consider. Transporting companies and credit card firms will reap the benefits. No matter who ends up dominating the sales market, these companies will benefit from the overall growth in the sector.

    Stand and Deliver With UPS and FedEx

    The top shipping companies are FedEx (NYSE: FDX) and UPS (NYSE: UPS). Both have been doing quite well.

    FedEx just released these key figures for 2010:

    • Revenue increased 13 percent.
    • Operating income improved by 19 percent.
    • Net Income increased 23 percent.
    • Adjusted earnings per share improved to $4.90 from $3.76 in 2009.

    FedEx also came in one spot ahead of Amazon at number eight in Fortune’s 2011 list of “The World’s Most Admired Companies.”

    FedEx appears to be very healthy, but UPS is about double the size of FedEx and experiencing similar growth. The stock has steadily climbed back to pre-recession levels after a big dip early in 2009.

    Here’s what UPS reported about their 2010 growth back in April:

    • Global revenue grew 7.3 percent and produced a 21 percent increase in operating profit.
    • UPS generated 900 million in free cash flows in 2010, increasing dividends by more than 10 percent.
    • Earnings per share increased to $4.40 from $4.15

    With Visa and MasterCard… Cash Isn’t Always King on the Internet

    It’s obviously impossible to pay in cash for things that are purchased online, so credit card companies will also benefit from online sales improving. The two dominant players here are Visa (NYSE: V) and MasterCard (NYSE: MA).

    • Visa has a strong outlook for 2011 through the first two quarters. They see revenue growing between 11 and 15 percent and annual free cash flow in excess of $3 billion by years end. They also plan to lower the supply of the stock by buying back $1 billion worth of common shares.
    • Visa also announced a new feature called Digital Wallet which will make it more efficient to purchase things online. They will partner with various large banks and provide a “Click-to-Buy” functionality for customers of these institutions. According to the report it will hit the market in fall of 2011.
    • MasterCard reported double-digit growth in the first quarter of this year over the first quarter of 2010. Revenue increased by 14.8 percent and net income increased by 19.4 percent. The stock, which peaked at over $300 per share, is finally getting close to that level after being cut in half by the recession.

    These services are crucial to the growth of online sales. Retail sales online could not exist without the ability to exchange currency and deliver products across the globe. So as long as online retail sales growth is strong, so will the growth of the infrastructure that is supporting it.

    Good investing,

    Justin Dove