By The Gold Report

Source: Thibaut Lepouttre for Streetwise Reports   05/16/2018

Thibaut Lepouttre of Caesars Report profiles an explorer with a substantial gold asset portfolio and some well-known backers.

Contact Gold Corp. (C:TSX.V) was able to acquire a substantial Nevada gold asset portfolio from Waterton in 2017, and used this purchase to go public right before the summer. Not “just another” gold exploration company, as the IPO was backed by, for instance Goldcorp Inc. (G:TSX; GG:NYSE), which invested C$7.5M at a price of C$1 per share.

It looks like Goldcorp didn’t want to miss out on the opportunity to secure a pole position in this Nevada-focused exploration company, whose flagship asset already contains a historic resource estimate of 1.4 million ounces of gold at an average grade of 1.5 g/t.

Pony Creek: Contact’s flagship property

Pony Creek, is located just 20 miles south of Newmont Mining’s Emigrant gold mine in the Piñon range in Elko County, Nevada. And Contact Gold is in good company as its Pony Creek claims are actually bordering the land package of Gold Standard Ventures Corp. (GSV:TSX.V; GSV:NYSE), which contains the Dark Star gold discovery. This discovery actually heated up this part of Nevada.

As you can see on the previous map, there appears to be a structural mineralized north-south trend in with five established gold deposits (Emigrant, Rain, Dark Star, Pinion, North Bullion). It also looks like the Bowl Zone (which hosts the 1.4Moz historical estimate) is located on the same trend.

This Bowl zone was actually discovered by Newmont Mining in the 1980s, and was subsequently owned by Vista Gold and Allied Nevada. Allied Nevada entered bankruptcy proceedings, and Waterton scooped up the exploration assets. After looking at several offers from other companies to acquire and explore the claims, Waterton accepted an offer from Contact Gold, which offered a combination of cash, stock and preferred stock.

Contact Gold has issued 18.55M shares, 11.111M preferred shares and made a C$7M cash payment, giving Waterton an initial 37% stake in Contact Gold, allowing it to participate in the exploration upside at Pony Creek.

As the properties were pretty much drill ready, Contact immediately started a 10,000 meter drill program in the summer of last year, as well as some more basic exploration activities to define and generate more (new) drill targets.

A large part of last year’s drill program was focusing on the Bowl zone of the Pony Creek project, where the historical resource is located as Contact Gold wanted to verify the historical data on this zone. On top of that, an RC drill rig was used to expand the mineralized zones before being redirected to the Pony Creek North zone, which is located halfway the Bowl zone and Gold Standard Ventures’ Jasperoid Wash.

Pony Creek North was originally discovered in the 1980s but it looks like Barrick Gold/Homestake were drilling too far up north and while their main interval of 43 meters at 0.47 g/t gold definitely yielded an interesting result, it never followed up on that hole.

This old intercept caught Contact’s interest and the company completed 2,500 meters of drilling before the end of the exploration season. 11 holes were drilled, and assay results of 44 meters at 0.34 g/t gold, 15 meters at 0.33 g/t gold and 14 meters at 0.32-0.33 g/t gold are decent results for a first drill program.

OK, 0.3-0.35 g/t isn’t anything to get really excited about (yet), but remember this was a so-called “first pass” drill program. These were the first 11 holes drilled on the property in almost 30 years and a lot more work needs to be done to determine the high priority targets. The company did a good job by defining a mineralized corridor of 1000 by 200 meters has now been identified, and Contact will very likely include a few more Pony Creek North holes in its 2018 exploration plan.

On top of that, the majority of the gold intercepts at Pony Creek North are very shallow. That’s important, as this means the strip ratio could be very low and the required tonnage could remain low as well, as PCN could be seen as a satellite deposit to the main Bowl zone.

At the Bowl zone, a total of 8,000 meters of drilling was completed. As mentioned before, the 2017 drill program wasn’t meant to result in an updated resource estimate, but was meant to form a basis for this year’s drill program. Virtually every hole drilled at Pony Creek as part of the 2017 exploration program has encountered anomalous gold values. Some holes contained low-grade material while other holes returned very respectable gold grades for oxidized material. But again, the 2017 drill program was just designed to be some sort of “pathfinder” exploration program to design the 2018 drill program as efficient as possible.

On top of the 10,400 meters of drilling, Contact also collected 3,500 soil samples, completed several geophysical surveys (including a 33 kilometer CSAMT survey) and ran an extensive mapping program, resulting in the discovery of a new mineralized target; the ‘West Target.’ This target is pretty close to the Bowl Zone, and as you can see in the next image, the soil sampling program seems to indicate there’s a huge surface anomaly of approximately 2,000 by 3-400 meters. A similar target was defined further to the north where the Moleen target is a 1.5-kilometer-long soil anomaly target literally bordering the GSV claims (and although it’s still early days, it appears to be an extension of Gold Standard Ventures’ Jasperoid Wash anomaly).

And finally, Contact Gold also increased its land position by approximately 40% during 2017 to ensure it has the majority of the gold-bearing trend pretty much locked up.

2018

All four zones of the southern part of the Pony Creek target (Moleen, West, North and Bowl) will be drilled this year, and the main focus will be on expanding the gold zones at Bowl and North (which really is where the low hanging fruit is). We would expect this to result in Contact being in a position to release a maiden NI43-101 compliant resource estimate. Just confirming the historical resource estimate would be an excellent first step.

Additionally, Contact Gold will also drill 6-8 holes at the North Star target, which is located immediately north of Gold Standard Ventures’ Dark Star deposit which contains just short of 1 million ounces of gold in oxidized mineralization. The CSAMT survey conducted on the North Star target as part of the 2017 exploration program seems to indicate a similar “signature” as the Dark Star deposit.

Trading 70% lower than the IPO price, despite strong shareholders

The share price appears to have been moving down due to some low-volume, but relentless selling ever since the company started trading.

A part of this could be explained by the owners of the original shell selling their stock (Contact Gold used a shell to go public), but it’s important to realize 50% of Contact’s stock (the shares owned by the insiders and Waterton) are locked up until the summer of next year. Adding Goldcorp’s 15% stake to the mix, 65% of the stock has been placed in strong hands.

There has been some insider buying as well, as according to SEDI filings CFO Wenger and CEO Lennox-King and Chairman Dorward have been active on the market, buying more stock. This won’t move the needle, but it’s an encouraging sign.

Fortunately, the Contact Gold management (headed by veterans, as you can see on the next image) was smart enough to come out of the gate fully cashed up and the company is fully funded for its 2018 exploration program.

So approximately 37% of the current amount of outstanding shares have a cost basis of C$1/share, whilst an additional 50% are locked up until next year. It’s clear that whoever is still selling now, is very likely doing so at a loss.

This year’s 16,000-meter drill program should allow Contact Gold to gain enough insight in its property to be in a position to publish a resource estimate on its Pony Creek gold project in Nevada. This should put the company on the map as Gold Standard Ventures, whose Dark Star property actually borders Contact Gold’s Pony Creek project, is trading at a multiple of Contact’s valuation. While this doesn’t mean Contact Gold should trade at the same valuation as Gold Standard, the current enterprise value of C$9M (based on a share price of C$0.31) doesn’t appear to do the company any justice.

Thibaut Lepouttre is the editor of the Caesars Report, a newsletter and mining portal based in Belgium that covers several junior mining companies with a special focus on precious metals and base metals. Lepouttre has a Bachelor of Law degree and two economics masters degrees that have forged his analytical approach to the mining sector. Considered a number cruncher, Lepouttre focuses on the valuations of companies and is consistently on the lookout for the next undervalued mining company.

Want to read more Gold Report articles like this? Sign up for our free e-newsletter, and you’ll learn when new articles have been published. To see a list of recent articles and interviews with industry analysts and commentators, visit our Streetwise Interviews page.

Disclosure:
1) Thibaut Lepouttre: I, or members of my immediate household or family, own shares of the following companies mentioned in this article: a long position in Contact Gold. I personally am, or members of my immediate household or family are, paid by the following companies mentioned in this article: None. My company currently has a financial relationship with Contact Gold. I determined which companies would be included in this article based on my research and understanding of the sector.
2) The following companies mentioned in this article are sponsors of Streetwise Reports: Gold Standard Ventures. Streetwise Reports does not accept stock in exchange for its services. Click here for important disclosures about sponsor fees. The information provided above is for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
3) Statements and opinions expressed are the opinions of the author and not of Streetwise Reports or its officers. The author is wholly responsible for the validity of the statements. The author was not paid by Streetwise Reports for this article. Streetwise Reports was not paid by the author to publish or syndicate this article.
4) This article does not constitute investment advice. Each reader is encouraged to consult with his or her individual financial professional and any action a reader takes as a result of information presented here is his or her own responsibility. By opening this page, each reader accepts and agrees to Streetwise Reports’ terms of use and full legal disclaimer. This article is not a solicitation for investment. Streetwise Reports does not render general or specific investment advice and the information on Streetwise Reports should not be considered a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Streetwise Reports does not endorse or recommend the business, products, services or securities of any company mentioned on Streetwise Reports.
5) From time to time, Streetwise Reports LLC and its directors, officers, employees or members of their families, as well as persons interviewed for articles and interviews on the site, may have a long or short position in securities mentioned. Directors, officers, employees or members of their immediate families are prohibited from making purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market or otherwise from the time of the interview or the decision to write an article, until one week after the publication of the interview or article.

Charts and images provided by the author.

( Companies Mentioned: C:TSX.V,
GSV:TSX.V; GSV:NYSE,
)