(VIDEO) What Is the Debt Situation in Europe and the U.S.?

(VIDEO) What Is the Debt Situation in Europe and the U.S.?

By Elliott Wave International

In this video clip from Steve Hochberg’s “Don’t Get Caught Holding the Bag” presentation, recorded at the San Francisco MoneyShow, Elliott Wave International’s Chief Market Analyst addresses a popular question we get at EWI. Enjoy this insight from Hochberg, then take a few minutes to learn how you can get Elliott Wave International’s newest free report: How to Protect Your Money When the U.S. Debt Bill Comes Due.


How to Protect Your Money When the U.S. Debt Bill Comes Due

Read this new FREE report from Robert Prechter

The Federal Reserve has been inflating the supply of dollars at a stunning 33% annual rate over the past five years. You don’t want to be unprepared when that bill comes due! Read this free report from Robert Prechter, market forecaster and a leading opponent of the Federal Reserve, and learn how you can protect yourself. As a result, you will understand today’s biggest risks to stocks, commodities, precious metals and the economy — risks that most mainstream sources cannot see because they’re blinded by decades of inflationary Fed policy.

Download your FREE report by Robert Prechter now — for a limited time >>

This article was syndicated by Elliott Wave International and was originally published under the headline (VIDEO) What Is the Debt Situation in Europe and the U.S.?. EWI is the world’s largest market forecasting firm. Its staff of full-time analysts led by Chartered Market Technician Robert Prechter provides 24-hour-a-day market analysis to institutional and private investors around the world.

Jordan Roy-Byrne: When Stalking Juniors, Follow the Leaders

Source: Kevin Michael Grace of The Gold Report (10/28/13)

http://www.theaureport.com/pub/na/jordan-roy-byrne-when-stalking-juniors-follow-the-leaders

The bear market in precious metals equities will end soon, says Jordan Roy-Byrne, editor and publisher of The Daily Gold Premium, perhaps even by the end of the year. But the rising tide will not lift all juniors equally. In this interview with The Gold Report, Roy-Byrne explains why bottom-fishing is a bad idea and why the savvy investor must find companies that will not just survive but thrive when the bears become bulls.

The Gold Report: The managing director of the International Monetary Fund, Christine Lagarde, worries about the world sliding back into recession. What are the chances of that?

Jordan Roy-Byrne: We tend to have recessions every four or five years, on average. In the last 30 or 40 years, however, recessions have been less frequent than the average, due to extremely expansionary monetary policy. But another recession is almost a certainty in the next couple of years. I expect it will be milder than the 2008 recession. Typically, after such a severe recession or financial crisis the next recession is quite mild in comparison.

TGR: We seem to have permanent quantitative easing in the U.S. Do you think there’s a point when the country will hit a debt wall?

JRB: I don’t know if the U.S. will ever hit a debt wall. We have the world’s reserve currency, and that’s not going to change any time soon. We have the ability to print a lot of money, and there’s always going to be demand for our bonds. If that demand wanes, I think we will see central banks increase their buying. They will buy every bond if they have to in order to prevent interest rates from rising.

Looking out over the next five years, I see similarities to the 1940s after World War II when there was essentially huge quantitative easing and interest rate price fixing. This was done to lower the debt-to-GDP ratio. There were a couple of recessions, but when the economy grew, it grew very strongly. There was quite a bit of inflation, that was the negative consequence, but the debt-to-GDP ratio did begin to decline.

The problem with debt is not the nominal amount. The problem is when the economy doesn’t grow fast enough to service the debt. One way to deal with that problem is to keep interest rates extremely low so there is very high nominal growth. The drawback to this is inflation. Commodity prices in the mid-to-late 1940s escalated substantially. I think we could see similarities in the next five years.

TGR: We’ve seen for some time an inverse relationship between precious metal stocks and equities in general. Do you think this will continue? Must equities fall before gold and silver stocks rise?

JRB: I do think this relationship will continue. Historically, gold stocks have performed fantastically at times when equities are in a bear market. The two best examples are 1972–1974 and 2000–2003. Because the gold bugs have lost a lot of money and don’t have the firepower to drive the market higher right now, outside money is going to have to come in. I think once conventional investments weaken, which I expect to happen in the next three to six months, asset managers will look to precious metals. For example, there were quite a few generalists and international fund managers at the recent Denver Gold Forum.

TGR: How long will this bear market in precious metal stocks last?

JRB: It could already be over. Gold and gold stocks have been in a bear market for two years and two months but silver, silver stocks and juniors peaked in April 2011 and have been in a bear market for 2.5 years. History shows that bear markets in the gold stocks tend to average 65%, while the two worst were 72%. At the June low the NYSE Arca Gold BUGS Index (HUI) was down 67%. That tells us the market is likely very close to a low or has already bottomed.

The market is retesting its summer low. Some stocks have already bottomed. Some will make double bottoms, and the worst will make new lows. That’s just how a bottom is—disjointed. The major bottoms in 2000 and 2008 occurred in October–November, so we are right on schedule.

TGR: How strong will the recovery be?

JRB: The recovery will be fantastic because that’s what always happens in this sector. Looking at recoveries from major bottoms starting from 1960, the average recovery for large gold stocks was 58% over the first four months and 75% over the first seven months. My guess is that the next recovery will be stronger than average, but the problem is we don’t know when it will start. It could be late November or even January. It could have started already. In the summer rally, Market Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) rebounded 59% from its low in only two months. Odds are, many stocks could be up 40–50% before most realize a bottom is in.

TGR: Could you talk about relative strength analysis and its importance to the valuation of precious metal stocks?

JRB: Relative strength analysis is a type of technical analysis that compares one security or market to another. We use this analysis to spot market leaders and market laggards. We want to own the leaders and avoid the laggards, obviously. You don’t necessarily want to chase the strongest stocks. There’s an art to it. My view is you want to identify what the strongest stocks are when the sector is correcting, and you want to buy them when they are correcting.

For example, the market has been correcting for the last several weeks, and this may continue for another week or two. So, if you happen to like a stock that has performed really well and you haven’t bought it yet, maybe in the next week or two that stock will come down another 5%, 10% or 15%, and that gives you the opportunity to buy it.

TGR: You’ve written that buying a weak stock on the dip is not a good idea. In a time of bottoming stocks, however, there is a great temptation to go bottom fishing. How do investors distinguish between stocks that are truly undervalued and those that have fallen for good reason?

JRB: Mining companies—95% of them, anyway—are not like blue chip stocks. A lot of these companies that have declined 80% can end up declining 99%. Relative strength analysis should be used in conjunction with fundamental analysis. For example, you may really like a company, but if it’s badly underperforming the sector, that is a warning sign.

A recent example is Pretium Resources Inc. (PVG:TSX; PVG:NYSE). It was very strong during the summer rebound, but at the end of August some huge and consistent selling came in and it continued into September. It was one of the weakest stocks in September, ahead of its major decline. The warning signs were there.

TGR: Let’s look at the four big mining locations in North America: Nevada, Mexico, Ontario and Quebec. We’ll begin with Mexico. Which companies do you like there and why?

JRB: Some of the absolutely best companies are located in Mexico, and that should tell you something about Mexico as a jurisdiction. Two of the best are First Majestic Silver Corp. (FR:TSX; AG:NYSE; FMV:FSE) and Argonaut Gold Inc. (AR:TSX). First Majestic put its Del Toro mine into production this year. It is ramping up steadily and will be the company’s largest mine. First Majestic continues to have a stronger growth outlook than all of its smaller former peers, which is quite amazing considering how strongly the company has grown already. One might expect its size to limit its growth. That’s not the case.

As far as relative strength goes, First Majestic has held up very well during this downturn compared to the majority of silver stocks. Typically, when silver rallies, First Majestic shares perform well. In the recent summer rally, shares went from $9 to $16. Again, this is quite amazing, considering that First Majestic is a billion-dollar company, not some tiny junior.

TGR: And Argonaut?

JRB: Argonaut has two growing mines in Mexico, La Colorada and El Castillo, and two strong development projects, San Antonio in Mexico and the recently acquired Magino project in Ontario. There could be permitting issues with San Antonio. It’s not going to be a slam dunk, but if Argonaut can get that mine into production before the end of 2014, it will have a growth profile basically unmatched by anyone in the industry. In addition, Argonaut has ongoing cash flow, a very strong cash position of around $140 million ($140M) and one of the best management teams in the industry.

TGR: Do you consider Argonaut to be an undervalued stock that’s likely to show a significant gain with the end of the bear market?

JRB: Yes. Argonaut’s relative strength has been very strong for the most part over the last year or two. In early July, its shares went from about $5 to more than $8, and I think we’re going to see a similar move when the bear market ends in the next few months.

Argonaut has the management, the capital and the projects to be a serious growth-oriented producer over the next three or four years. That’s why I call it a long-term gift.

TGR: What do you like in Nevada?

JRB: Nevada’s a great jurisdiction, both politically and geologically. Drill costs tend to be lower and deposits are easier to work with because so many projects are open pittable and heap leachable. There are two Nevada companies I like. The first is Corvus Gold Inc. (KOR:TSX). This is one of my absolute favorites right now. The company has a large gold deposit called North Bullfrog very close to Barrick Gold Corp.’s (ABX:TSX; ABX:NYSE) old Bullfrog mine.

Corvus’ main resource at North Bullfrog is moderately economic at current prices, but the real kicker is that it has been getting higher-grade intercepts at Sierra Blanca and especially Yellowjacket, and the metallurgy on the latter is very good. Corvus will be coming out with a new resource estimate by the end of 2013 or early 2014 and a preliminary economic assessment will follow. Yellowjacket is going to be part of a starter pit, and I believe the economics at these gold prices are going to be very favorable.

TGR: What is Corvus’ relative strength?

JRB: Its relative strength could be indicating that it has something very significant on its hands and that Yellowjacket is going to be worth quite a bit. Corvus is one of only three stocks in this sector trading above a rising 400-day moving average. It’s difficult to buy a stock that’s already gone up so much, but I think Corvus is going to perform very well in 2014. I think it has a good shot to be acquired.

TGR: What is your second Nevada pick?

JRB: As far as production stories go, Klondex Mines Ltd. (KDX:TSX; KLNDF:OTCBB) is one I’ve started following recently. With regard to relative strength, it has been one of the strongest stocks over the last six to nine months. If you like the fundamentals, you want to try to buy it on weakness. Klondex’s Fire Creek project looks to have outstanding potential. Grades have been spectacular; the company has a sizeable resource and it has been doing some bulk sampling, which I believe has gone pretty well.

When Klondex goes into commercial production, it is going to be able to produce a sizeable amount of gold at a low cost with very low capital expenses. It’s going to be highly economic, but it won’t be easy, and there will have to be some financings along the way. This is an underground, narrow-vein mine, but the new CEO, Paul Huet, is experienced with these types of deposits and is the man for the job. It’s a perfect fit.

TGR: What do you like in Ontario and Quebec?

JRB: Balmoral Resources Ltd. (BAR:TSX.V; BAMLF:OTCQX), which just announced a financing that will take its cash position to $11M. The company has made a high-grade discovery at its Martiniere project, which is located about 40 kilometers away from Detour Gold Corp.’s (DGC:TSX) mine. Balmoral should have a maiden resource estimate out in early 2014. This is going to be a high-grade property, and, like Corvus, it’s another potential acquisition.

The stock has been beaten down, but it did rally 100% during the summer. That tells me that there is a lot of leverage if you buy shares near a low. CEO Darin Wagner has done it before—built up an exploration company and sold it for nearly $0.5 billion. It looks as if he’s going to be able to do it again. The question comes down to what price will Balmoral sell out. Obviously it wants to wait for a market recovery, so it can prove up more value and get a better price. At the same time, potential acquirers (of not just Balmoral) want to wait for improved market sentiment. No one is taking any risks right now, though those that do could be rewarded.

TGR: Any other companies anywhere you’d like to mention?

JRB: Bear Creek Mining Corp. (BCM:TSX.V) in Peru. The company’s Corani deposit has gotten environmental approval, and it’s going to be a mine. The economics are tremendous. It can make money at $20/ounce ($20/oz) silver, and it can make a ton of money at $25/oz. This is a stock that has shown very good relative strength over the last 12 months. That says that long-term selling has dried up.

The only issue for Bear Creek is financing. The company can’t escape doing an equity component if it intends to finance the entire project, and that would be just too dilutive at these prices. So it is going to look at starting with a smaller operation, getting that going and then working its way up because this will eventually become a huge mine.

TGR: What about Bear Creek’s Santa Ana project?

JRB: That was taken away by the previous administration in Peru. Bear Creek has been going through the courts to try to get it back. There was a story in Reuters that quoted the mining minister of Peru saying he was looking for an amicable solution. The market is essentially giving Bear Creek zero for this project, but it looks as if the company could get some value out of it in the coming months. I think investors should keep their eyes on the Santa Ana situation. Who knows? This could be a reason why Bear Creek shares are showing good relative strength.

TGR: Bear Creek’s share price has yo-yoed from $1.60 to more than $2.50 twice since August.

JRB: It’s a very volatile stock. There’s not a huge amount of liquidity in it because something in the vicinity of 50–60% is held by a small number of hands. Silver Wheaton Corp. (SLW:TSX; SLW:NYSE) and Tocqueville are big holders. It’s a stock you want to buy on weakness rather than on strength.

TGR: We’ve discussed companies in Mexico and Peru. A couple of people I’ve interviewed in the last month have said that they are not happy with the talk of a new Mexican royalty regime. What do you make of this?

JRB: First, nothing has gone through. Second, the mining lobby in Mexico is very powerful, so I would be surprised if it does go through at that level. We’re talking about a 7% tax. If we get back into a bull market for precious metals, I don’t think 7% is really going to matter. I’m not an expert on this issue, but maybe we’ll see a 3% or 4% tax go through. It’s just a random guess.

Based on the charts of how companies operating in Mexico are performing, this potential tax is not an issue. However, if these companies in Mexico start to underperform the sector it could be because of the new tax regime.

TGR: Peru was regarded as toxic just a few years ago, but its reputation has improved a fair bit. I’m told that each company operating in Peru has to be considered individually based on its ability to come to a modus vivendi with the government and local communities. Do you agree?

JRB: I think that’s accurate. Let’s step back and remember that Peru is one of the world’s leading producers of commodities. Peru is economically dependent on the mining industry. Bear Creek is a wonderful example of what you said. At Corani, Bear Creek has done fabulous work with the local community, which will see lots of jobs when it goes into production. But Santa Ana was taken away from the company because of local strife. The two projects are in completely different areas. It’s a case-by-case situation. Investors have to look at where the project is located and the attitudes of the local community. Bear Creek’s situation underscores this perfectly.

TGR: Maynard Keynes said famously that the market can remain irrational longer than an investor can remain solvent. Many investors in gold and silver companies are close to their limits in this regard. What advice do you have for them?

JRB: Well, everyone’s personal financial situation is different. Everyone has different goals and tolerance of risk and time objectives. Therefore, it’s difficult to give blanket advice, but if investors are in companies that have been market laggards, companies that don’t have much potential, they have got to sell them. They should do research and get into companies with the potential to be market leaders, companies that will not just survive but thrive when we do get a recovery.

TGR: Jordan, thank you for your time and your insights.

Jordan Roy-Byrne is a Chartered Market Technician, a member of the Market Technicians Association and a former official contributor to the CME Group, the largest futures exchange in the world. He is the editor of The Daily Gold Premium, and his work has been featured in CNBC, Barron’s, the Financial Times,Alphaville, Yahoo Finance, Business Insider, 321Gold, Gold-Eagle, FinancialSense, GoldSeek and Kitco.

Want to read more Gold Report interviews like this? Sign up for our free e-newsletter, and you’ll learn when new articles have been published. To see a list of recent interviews with industry analysts and commentators, visit our Streetwise Interviews page.

DISCLOSURE:

1) Kevin Michael Grace conducted this interview for The Gold Report and provides services to The Gold Report as an independent contractor. He or his family own shares of the following companies mentioned in this interview: None.

2) The following companies mentioned in the interview are sponsors of The Gold Report: Argonaut Gold Inc., Klondex Mines Ltd. and Balmoral Resources Ltd. Streetwise Reports does not accept stock in exchange for its services or as sponsorship payment.

3) Jordan Roy-Byrne: I or my family own shares of the following companies mentioned in this interview: Argonaut Gold Inc., Bear Creek Mining Corp. and Corvus Gold Inc. I personally am or my family is paid by the following companies mentioned in this interview: None. My company has a financial relationship with the following companies mentioned in this interview: Argonaut Gold Inc., Corvus Gold Inc., Bear Creek Mining Corp., First Majestic Silver Corp. and Balmoral Resources Ltd. I was not paid by Streetwise Reports for participating in this interview. Comments and opinions expressed are my own comments and opinions. I had the opportunity to review the interview for accuracy as of the date of the interview and am responsible for the content of the interview.

4) Interviews are edited for clarity. Streetwise Reports does not make editorial comments or change experts’ statements without their consent.

5) The interview does not constitute investment advice. Each reader is encouraged to consult with his or her individual financial professional and any action a reader takes as a result of information presented here is his or her own responsibility. By opening this page, each reader accepts and agrees to Streetwise Reports’ terms of use and full legal disclaimer.

6) From time to time, Streetwise Reports LLC and its directors, officers, employees or members of their families, as well as persons interviewed for articles and interviews on the site, may have a long or short position in securities mentioned and may make purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market or otherwise.

Streetwise – The Gold Report is Copyright © 2013 by Streetwise Reports LLC. All rights are reserved. Streetwise Reports LLC hereby grants an unrestricted license to use or disseminate this copyrighted material (i) only in whole (and always including this disclaimer), but (ii) never in part.

Streetwise Reports LLC does not guarantee the accuracy or thoroughness of the information reported.

Streetwise Reports LLC receives a fee from companies that are listed on the home page in the In This Issue section. Their sponsor pages may be considered advertising for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1734.

Participating companies provide the logos used in The Gold Report. These logos are trademarks and are the property of the individual companies.

101 Second St., Suite 110

Petaluma, CA 94952

Tel.: (707) 981-8999

Fax: (707) 981-8998

Email: [email protected]

 

 

Deciding on a Forex Trading Platform

Deciding which forex trading platform to use is the first thing that many traders have to do. Most forex brokers have their own proprietary trading platform, which means that this decision may play a key role in deciding which broker to use. While most forex trading platforms may seem similar on the surface, all of them have their differences and idiosyncrasies. There are three main factors that you should consider when deciding on a forex trading platform: usability, latency and compatibility. Since it can be disruptive to switch systems and brokers, you should take your time and do your research before settling on your platform.

The usability of a trading platform includes how intuitive it is to use and how easy it is to customize. A trading platform needs to be simple, direct and easy to use. You want your trading strategy to dictate how you use the platform, not the other way around. You will already have many factors working against you and your money, your platform shouldn’t add to that. A good trading platform will be able to be modified, extended and customized to suit any trader’s strategies. You never want to feel limited by the capabilities of your software, or find yourself fumbling for the correct keyboard shortcuts at a critical time.

Latency is the amount of time it takes for the system to react to your actions and the amount of time it takes the system to report data to you. Latency can be a problem with the broker’s network as well as the platform itself. In an extremely fast-paced market, latency is especially hurtful. Scalpers can have their techniques completely invalidated by even seemingly insignificant levels of lag, so it is vital to test out the latency of your broker and your trading platform. For those who hold positions long-term, latency is not as critical an issue.

Compatibility is becoming especially important, but this does not just mean whether the platform runs on PCs or Macs. Cross compatibility also includes the ability to log into your trading platform on your phone or tablet, which can be extremely vital. Since the forex market is open 24 hours a day, it is impossible to be glued to the computer screen at all times. Those who have trading strategies that demand continuous management will find phone and tablet applications practically a necessity. A fast, bug-free and reliable mobile application for your trading platform can radically alter your trading possibilities, especially for traders that may not know where they’ll be when news hits.

While it is your strategy and your discipline that will ultimately make or break you as a forex trader, your trading platform is going to become your best friend and closest colleague. Remember that your trading platform’s limitations are your limitations. You will need to learn your system well and utilize it to its fullest extent, especially with more complex forex strategies. While the right platform does not assure success in the forex market, the wrong platform will almost assuredly lead to failure.

To learn more please visit www.clmforex.com

Disclaimer: Trading of foreign exchange contracts, contracts for difference, derivatives and other investment products which are leveraged, can carry a high level of risk. These products may not be suitable for all investors. It is possible to lose more than your initial investment. All funds committed should be risk capital. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. A Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) is available from the company website . Please read and consider the PDS before making any decision to trade Core Liquidity Markets’ products. The risks must be understood prior to trading. Core Liquidity Markets refers to Core Liquidity Markets Pty Ltd. Core Liquidity Markets is an Australian company which is registered with ASIC, ACN 164 994 049. Core Liquidity Markets is an authorized representative of Direct FX Trading Pty Ltd (AFSL) Number 305539, which is the authorizing Licensee and Principal.

 

Israel holds rate steady as shekel appreciates

By www.CentralBankNews.info     Israel’s central bank kept its policy rate steady at 1.0 percent, as widely expected after three cuts earlier this year, saying future rate moves depend on inflation, economic growth, the monetary policy of major central banks and the exchange rate of the shekel.
    The Bank of Israel (BOI), which has cut its rate by 75 basis points this year to help stem the rise in the shekel and counter weaker economic growth, noted that the appreciation of the shekel had come to a halt in the last month, weakening by 1.5 percent in terms of its effective exchange rate and by 0.7 percent against the U.S. dollar while most other currencies had strengthened.
    The shekel has risen steadily against the U.S. dollar this year, hitting a high of 3.49 to the U.S. dollar on Sept. 19 compared with 3.73 at the end of last year. But since Sept. 19, the day after the U.S. Federal Reserve delayed its tapering of asset purchases, the shekel has risen and was trading at 3.53 today.
    Among the main considerations behind its decision to maintain its interest rate, the BOI said that inflation remains within its 1-3 percent target range of and below the midpoint. Israel’s inflation rate was steady at 1.3 percent in September from August.

    The bank also said that economic activity continued at a rate that was slightly below 3 percent, excluding natural gas output, although several indicators point to a slowdown in the third quarter, primarily in exports and industrial production.
    It also referred to its three recent rate cuts, the International Monetary Fund’s reduced global growth forecasts and the Federal Reserve’s delayed tapering of its bond purchases.
    In addition, the BOI said the number of housing transactions continues to decline though home prices continue to rise along with a high volume of new mortgages.

    www.CentralBankNews.info

Monetary Policy Week in Review – Oct 21-25, 2013: Mexico, Jordan cut as 5 central banks strike dovish tone

By www.CentralBankNews.info

    Last week Mexico and Jordan’s central banks cut their policy rates while five other banks – Canada, Sweden, Norway, Colombia and Namibia – struck more dovish tones, underscoring that the era of extraordinary accommodative monetary policy is set to continue into next year.
    Slower-than-expected global growth, which led the U.S. Federal Reserve to delay its expected tapering of asset purchases, has now forced the Bank of Canada and Norges Bank to drop their tightening biases, while an unflappable Swedish Riksbank maintained its tightening bias but nevertheless cut its growth forecasts.
    The Federal Reserve’s surprise decision last month to continue its $85 billion monthly purchases immediately eased the pressure on emerging market currencies by restoring capital inflows, a shift that allowed the Bank of Jordan to cut its rates for the second time this year.
    The Bank of Mexico, which has also seen its peso rebound after falling in May along with other major emerging market currencies, cut its rate for the third time this year on growing downside risks to global growth and flagged that it would be trimming its growth forecast.
   The Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey also benefited from the prospect of continued ultra easy monetary policy in advanced economies, leaving its rates on hold as the recent rise in its lira currency is helping keep inflation under control.
   Although the Central Bank of Colombia maintained its rates last week following three cuts earlier this year, it noted that the downside risks were “not negligible and may have increased recently.”
    Other central banks that maintained rates last week include the Central Bank of the Philippines and the Central Bank of the Republic of Uzbekistan
    But while most of the world’s central banks are still leaning toward further easing, there is a growing recognition of the dangers to financial stability from continued low policy rates, whether the dangers stem from high property prices – as evidenced by a warning from Germany’s Bundesbank last week and observed in a raft of countries such as New Zealand, China, Sweden, Canada, Norway and London – or from investors throwing caution to the wind by taking on excessive risk.
    And during the U.S. flirtation with an unprecedented default the previous week, one of the scary prospects was the realization that the Fed and other major advanced central banks with ultra-easy policy have limited ammunition to counter the global financial chaos that would arise from such a default.
    There is thus is a growing bias within central banks towards normalizing policy rates so it’s far from a foregone conclusion that global interest rates will continue to decline for much longer.
    In addition, there were fresh signs of economic improvement last week.
    In the United Kingdom, the Bank of England is expected to signal in next month’s inflation report that interest rates may rise sooner than currently forecast as the economy is accelerating, data from China topped expectations and investors are increasingly confident about the euro zone’s slow, but steady climb back from recession.
   
    Last week’s two rate cuts reinforced this year’s trend toward lower rates with policy rates through the first 43 weeks of this year now cut 96 times, or 23.3 percent of this year’s 412 policy decisions taken by the 90 central banks followed by Central Bank News.
    This is up from 94 total rate cuts after the previous week, but slightly down in percentage terms from 23.4 percent, and down from 25.3 percent after the first six months of the year.
    Meanwhile, the trend toward higher rates seen in September has weakened with the number of rate increases worldwide stagnating in the last three weeks at 22. In percentage terms, rate rises declined in to 5.3 percent last week from this year’s 412 policy decisions, down from 5.5 percent the previous week but still up from 4.7 percent at the end of the first half.
    
    LAST WEEK’S (WEEK 43) MONETARY POLICY DECISIONS:

COUNTRYMSCI     NEW RATE           OLD RATE         1 YEAR AGO
JORDANFM4.50%4.75%5.00%
NAMIBIA5.50%5.50%5.50%
TURKEYEM4.50%4.50%5.75%
UZBEKISTAN12.00%12.00%12.00%
CANADADM1.00%1.00%1.00%
NORWAYDM1.50%1.50%1.50%
SWEDEN1.00%1.00%1.25%
PHILIPPINESEM3.50%3.50%3.50%
MEXICOEM3.50%3.75%4.50%
COLOMBIAEM3.25%3.25%4.75%
    
    This week (week 44) nine central banks are scheduled to hold policy meetings, including Israel, Angola, India, Hungary, United States, Fiji, Egypt, New Zealand and Zambia. Zambia has announced it will hold its meeting at the end of the month but not the specific day.

COUNTRYMSCI             DATE CURRENT  RATE        1 YEAR AGO
ISRAELDM28-Oct1.00%2.00%
ANGOLA28-Oct9.75%10.25%
INDIAEM29-Oct7.50%8.00%
HUNGARYEM29-Oct3.60%6.25%
UNITED STATESDM30-Oct0.25%0.25%
FIJI31-Oct0.50%0.50%
EGYPTEM31-Oct8.75%9.25%
NEW ZEALANDDM31-Oct2.50%2.50%
ZAMBIA                 ?9.75%9.25%
  

How Low Interest Rates Are Holding 144 Million U.S. Workers Hostage

281310_DL_whitefootby John Paul Whitefoot, BA

Are the long-term retirement plans of working Americans being held hostage by the Federal Reserve?

If the point of quantitative easing was to stave off a recession and spur jobs growth, I think it’s fair to say the Federal Reserve’s $85.0-billion-per-month money-printing scheme has been a failure. At the very least, I’m not so sure the money was well spent, and that the end does not justify the means.

I enter as evidence almost $4.0 trillion that the Federal Reserve has dumped into the U.S. economy since 2009. To put that into perspective, the average unemployment rate that same year was around 8.5%; that translates into roughly 13.1 million Americans being out of work in 2009. Fast-forward to today, and the unemployment rate stands at an unacceptable 7.2%, or 11.3 million Americans. (Sources: “Civilian Labor Force (CLF16OV),” Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Economic Research web site, last accessed October 24, 2013; “The Employment Situation – September 2013,” U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics web site, October 22, 2013.)

It could be argued that over the last four years, the Federal Reserve has printed off $4.0 trillion to create 1.8 million jobs.

But at what expense? Since the stock market crash in 2008, the Federal Reserve, through its use of quantitative easing, has sent U.S. interest rates towards near-record lows. In fact, the Federal Reserve has kept the federal funds rate target between zero and 0.25% for almost five years.

That’s terrible news for anyone looking to save money, and near-record-low interest rates make it virtually impossible for people to save money to meet their retirement needs. Sadly, for those nearing or already in retirement, the artificially low interest rate environment has taken income out of fixed income investing and devastated their retirement savings.

So much so, in fact, that 37% of middle-class Americans say they’ll never retire. On top of that, 42% say it’s impossible to pay monthly bills and save for retirement. (Source: “Middle Class Americans Face a Retirement Shutdown; 37% Say ‘I’ll Never Retire, But Work Until I’m Too Sick or Die,’ a Wells Fargo Study Finds,” Wells Fargo web site, October 23, 2013.)

Thanks to a near-zero interest rate environment, the retirement plans of today’s 144 million working Americans have been decimated. But in the eyes of the Federal Reserve and the U.S. government, it’s been money well printed. In a nutshell, 144 million Americans have had their retirement savings held hostage so the Federal Reserve and U.S. government can point to marginal jobs growth.

But even that is debatable. Keep in mind that millions of Americans have stopped looking for work and are not counted among the unemployed, suggesting more people today are out of work than before the Federal Reserve stepped in to “save” the U.S. economy.

Does the end justify the means? While it’s great that the American economy is creating jobs, it’s tough to say whether it’s been worth almost $4.0 trillion and an income environment that has been punishing the 144 million working Americans who have spent years saving for retirement.

Sure, the S&P 500, Dow Jones Industrial Average, and NYSE are enjoying a record run, but again, middle-class America is missing out. Only 24% of middle-class Americans are confident in the stock market as an investment vehicle for retirement, and 45% say the stock market doesn’t benefit people like them.

But with the S&P 500 up 23% year-to-date, the Dow Jones Industrial Average up 18%, the NASDAQ up 27%, and the Federal Reserve still printing off money and devaluing the dollar, the stock market is, without question, the place to be.

While investors still need to show caution and understand where they’re parking their retirement money, there are a lot of great investment opportunities out there right now, both domestically and internationally.

This article How Low Interest Rates Are Holding 144 Million U.S. Workers Hostage was originally published at Daily Gains Letter

 

 

Is Following Irrationality the New Trade Strategy?

by Mohammad Zulfiqar, BA

As the U.S. government shutdown was prolonged, not only was there noise about getting away from the U.S. dollar, but also about what happens to the U.S. economy next. On one hand, there was a consensus that the U.S. government shutdown was actually a good thing, serving as a cost-cutting measure that allowed the government to save money. On the other hand, there were those who said it was impacting the U.S. economy’s recovery process and would wipe a certain percentage off the U.S. economy’s gross domestic product (GDP).

Both sides had a solid argument to prove their point about the impact of the U.S. government shutdown on the U.S. economy, but my stance differs from that of both groups. Before going into the details, be aware that we don’t know the exact impact of the shutdown just yet, because the economic data has not been released, but time will eventually draw a better picture.

So what’s my take on the U.S. government shutdown that happened for 16 days? Forget the shutdown; it didn’t matter. What I am concerned about is the other dismal trends that continue to remain in the U.S. economy. If they are not fixed or their direction doesn’t change, then economic growth in the U.S. economy becomes very doubtful.

One of the trends I have been closely following is the unemployment in the U.S. economy. I agree that the number on the surface, the unemployment rate, looks much better than what it was during the financial crisis. However, when I assess and analyze the details, it’s not looking very good.

What you want to see are Americans getting better-paying jobs; once this happens, they will have disposable incomes, which promotes consumer spending. Sadly, they are just not getting those. We are seeing a significant amount of jobs creation in the low-wage-paying sectors of the U.S. economy, but not in sectors like construction and mining, where wages are better.

On top of all this, those who are unemployed in the U.S. economy are staying out of work for much longer than usual. For example, in September, the average duration of unemployment was 36.9 weeks; this means that those who are unemployed are off work for an average of more than nine months. In early 2009, this number stood at 20 weeks. (Source: “Average (Mean) Duration of Unemployment (UEMPMEAN),” Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Economic Research web site, last accessed October 23, 2013.)

Unfortunately, what many are not focusing on is that as Americans remain unemployed longer, they will begin to forget and lose their skills. This results in them having an even harder time finding jobs in the future. In addition, once a person is unemployed for an extended period, they risk having to give up unemployment claims and any savings they may have accumulated.

When I look at this, I have to wonder if all the effort we have seen by the Federal Reserve and the government was useful or not.

I don’t think the recovery in the U.S. economy that we have been hoping for since the financial crisis will occur by printing money. If there had been some progress, we would have these anemic trends turning into healthy ones by now; currently, they remain on the same trajectory.

As a result, I continue to watch key stock indices very carefully, as they seem to be running ahead of reality. Investors have to keep in mind the quote of John Maynard Keynes: “The market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent.” This may be the case now. Follow irrationality, but be very careful at the same time.

 

This article Is Following Irrationality the New Trade Strategy? was originally published at Daily Gains Letter

Urge to “Dump Gold” Finished as US Fed “Turns Dovish”, Diwali Begins

London Gold Market Report
from Adrian Ash
BullionVault
Mon 28 Oct 08:25 EST

WHOLESALE London prices of gold sat tight Monday morning, holding onto Friday’s 6-week closing high as European stockmarkets failed to continue a rise in Asian shares.

 Silver was unchanged with commodities, major government bonds and gold, sitting at $22.58 per ounce by lunchtime.

 The US Dollar rallied after hitting a new 9-month low on its trade-weighted index against major competitor currencies.

 Gold last week enjoyed its strongest rise in almost 3 months, adding 2.6% as silver rose 2.9%.

 “Gold’s ascent above $1350, to one-month highs, has been driven by investor interest,” says a note from Barclays Capital, pointing to the “largest daily increase” in exchange-traded gold funds, which give investors exposure to the metal’s price without them taking physical ownership, since January.

 Over the week as a whole, however, the largest gold ETF – the SPDR Gold Trust listed in New York (ticker: GLD), as well as in Hong Kong and other financial centers – saw its holdings drop 10 tonnes, hitting new 54-month lows of 871.

 The GLD started 2013 with near-record holdings of 1,350 tonnes, before shedding 380 tonnes as prices crashed in the first half of the year.

 “There’s not much reason anymore to dump gold further,” says one London trading desk in a note, “[not] while the US Fed renews its dovish stance after a miserable attempt at the medium-rare hawk side of things.

 “In truth, the USA are cornered by a sluggish growth.”

 The US central bank begins a two-day meeting on Tuesday, announcing its monetary policy on Wednesday. Many analysts now expect it to stick with $85 billion of monthly quantitative easing.

 Looking at short-term interest rates, now held at zero for almost four years, “the implied yield on the Fed funds futures contract for December 2015 has fallen from a recent peak of 1.45% percent to 0.65%,” says Reuters, “highlighting that investors have scaled back rate hikes expectations in 2015 and beyond.”

 “There’s no real indication,” said Thomas Capalbo at New York brokers Newedge, speaking after Friday’s weaker-than-expected US data, “that things are getting much better, and no indication saying that we are going to see tapering soon.

 “So that’s going to be beneficial for gold and probably silver too.”

 US regulator the CFTC is currently three weeks behind with its Commitment of Traders data for gold and silver futures, owing to this month’s debt-ceiling shutdown.

 Gold in India – the world’s heaviest consumer nation – meantime held near record highs above international benchmarks on Monday, with the premium in Mumbai at $120 per ounce.

 The peak gold-buying festival of Diwali begins on Saturday. After surprising market analysts with a small interest-rate rise in September, Reserve Bank of India governor Raghuram Rajan will announce the latest policy move on Tuesday.

 “Impact of high gold premiums will be there on prices on the [start of Diwali] Dhanteras day,” says Haresh Soni, chairman of the All India Gems & Jewellery Trade Federation, “because supplies have dried up in the absence of imports in the last three months due to government curbs.”

 Jewelry sales are stable from Diwali last year, says Soni, but sales of investment gold bars and coins are running at half 2012 levels.

 Former president of the Bombay Bullion Association Suresh Hundia disagrees, says MoneyControl, putting India’s jewelry sales down by 60%, with coin and gold bar sales 70% lower.

 “Government has banned import of bars and coins,” says Hundia. “So, there is no supply to meet the demand for such items on the festival day.”

 The Times of India today reports what it calls a “treasure trove” of mineral resources discovered in Uttar Pradesh, including up to 0.25 tonnes of gold.

 India last year imported some 845 tonnes of gold to meet domestic demand.

 Smuggling may have increased by 50% so far in 2013, reports the New Indian Express.

 The number of Indian customs gold seizures is little changed from 2012, the Business Standard says, but the value of those hauls has jumped by well over 300%.

 Over in China, meantime premiums on the Shanghai Gold Exchange briefly went negative overnight, recovering to $1.50 per ounce above London spot gold prices but down from this spring’s record levels of $30.

 Next month’s planning meeting for Beijing’s politburo will see “unprecedented” reforms, according to Yu Zhengsheng, the fourth-highest member of the Communist Party’s Standing Committee.

 Interbank interest rates rose again in Shanghai today, taking the annualized cost of 1-month money to 6.48%, the highest level since June’s spike to double digits.

Adrian Ash

BullionVault

Gold price chart, no delay | Buy gold online

 

Adrian Ash is head of research at BullionVault, the secure, low-cost gold and silver market for private investors online, where you can fully allocated bullion already vaulted in your choice of London, New York, Singapore, Toronto or Zurich for just 0.5% commission.

 

(c) BullionVault 2013

Please Note: This article is to inform your thinking, not lead it. Only you can decide the best place for your money, and any decision you make will put your money at risk. Information or data included here may have already been overtaken by events – and must be verified elsewhere – should you choose to act on it.

 

 

 

 

Is Sitting on the Fence the Best Investment Strategy Right Now?

281310_IC_leongby George Leong, B.Comm.

Recently, a friend called me up and asked for some investment advice. He wondered if he should run for the exits, given the recent run-up in the stock market in what is now a somewhat euphoric investment climate.

My response? Yes and no.

I told my friend to take some profits off the table, but at the same time, he should also ride the stock market higher to what will likely be higher upside moves.

This is something that I have constantly advised during this recent stock market rally.

Hey, why take all of the your profits off the table now when there will surely (at least I’m thinking) be more gains to end the year? That is, of course, if the shopping season doesn’t tank and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke doesn’t decide to surprise us with tapering. I doubt Ben will be smart enough to taper, but then again, with his stint as the head of the central bank drawing to a close, he may yet give us a surprise.

At this time, it’s all about maximizing your opportunities in the stock market while the easy money is flowing in. In other words, follow Dow theory and ride the ticker tape higher.

Even long-time perennial bear David Rosenberg of Gluskin Sheff appears to be conforming to the mass populous. In an interview with CNBC, Rosenberg seemed the most bullish I have ever seen him towards the stock market over the past decade, when he was constantly telling us stocks were set to fall.

In the interview, Rosenberg went as far as to suggest a stock weighting of just over 50%. (Source: Navarro, B.J., “Why a top market bear is turning bullish,” CNBC, October 22, 2013.) His top areas for growth include industrials, technology, and large-cap exporters.

“There are some opportunities in the stock market,” Rosenberg commented. (Source: Ibid.)

So here we are, chasing the S&P 500 higher breaking record after record.

However, we will likely see a retrenchment should the rapid rise continue unabated, as an overextension of the market is problematic.

So I’d offer investors the same advice I offered to my friend: for now, ride the gains, but be sure to take some profits off the table, especially following surges in a stock that appear to be overdone. The case of Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ/NFLX) last Tuesday is a prime example.

This article Is Sitting on the Fence the Best Investment Strategy Right Now? was originally published at Investment Contrarians

 

 

What Caterpillar’s Big Drop in Earnings Means for the General Stock Market

by Sasha Cekerevac, BA

With the S&P 500 hovering around its all-time highs, I think it’s quite interesting to read some of the latest corporate earnings reports and get a sense of what’s really happening in the global economy.

One of the most international companies within the S&P 500 is Caterpillar Inc. (NYSE/CAT). The firm recently released its third-quarter 2013 corporate earnings report, in which the firm poured some cold water on expectations. Revenue during the quarter was down 18% year-over-year, and corporate earnings were down 44% year-over-year. (Source: Caterpillar Inc., October 23, 2013.)

That’s not even the worst part. The company also brought down guidance for both revenue and corporate earnings for the foreseeable future.

In its corporate earnings release, Caterpillar cites several issues that it’s worried about, including uncertainty regarding U.S. fiscal and monetary policy, the health of economic regions globally (including the eurozone and China), and a lack of demand from customers.

Because revenue and corporate earnings growth is questionable, the company is taking the only smart action it can—reducing its own cost base. Obviously, no company can force a customer to buy their product, but it can keep its operations as lean as possible. To that end, the firm has cut 13,000 jobs globally over the past year, reduced pay and incentives, and initiated the “implementation of general austerity measures across the company.”

Considering Caterpillar is a large firm within the S&P 500 and it has its fingers on the pulse of the global economy, do any of these comments give you hope or confidence that either the domestic or international economies are about to surge upward in growth? Not to me, it doesn’t.

This is where I raise serious questions about the strength and health of the S&P 500. Caterpillar is one of the largest international companies, a component of the S&P 500, and would not be issuing such a weak forward guidance regarding potential for corporate earnings growth unless management was truly concerned about the future.

            Chart courtesy of www.StockCharts.com

 

I think that the chart above, which places the price of Caterpillar against the price of the S&P 500 (black line), is very interesting. From late 2006 until early 2008, the S&P 500 moved far ahead of the price of Caterpillar. Then, there was a convergence and both the S&P 500 and Caterpillar literally moved lockstep until the middle of 2010, when Caterpillar outperformed.

From 2010 until mid-2012, Caterpillar continued to diverge from the S&P 500, primarily due to the strong corporate earnings gained from selling equipment to mining companies. Currently, the S&P 500 has continued moving higher, while Caterpillar has stalled.

Generally speaking, markets tend to overshoot, moving from oversold into overbought territory. After reading the outlook for corporate earnings and revenue given by company management, it’s hard to logically believe that Caterpillar’s stock price will accelerate.

If that’s the case, is it more likely that the S&P 500 will decline in order to revert to the mean? In my opinion, if a company that has extensive operations around the world is telling me that it’s extremely cautious about the outlook, I find it hard to recommend investors put new money into the S&P 500 at such lofty levels.

In fact, I think many of these concerns are legitimate, and you will see more companies having difficulty increasing revenue and corporate earnings going forward. While the market is being fueled by cheap money from central banks, at some point, corporate earnings will matter.

Similar to a balloon, it takes quite a bit of work to keep pumping up the numbers, but it deflates very quickly.

To help protect your portfolio, advanced investors might consider using options, such as buying puts, which move up in value when the market or stock declines. Another possibility is buying an inverse exchange-traded fund (ETF) like the ProShares UltraShort S&P500 (NYSEArca/SDS). A note on some of these inverse ETFs: they are great for the short-term, but not well suited to long-term holdings, as they can erode in value and not mimic the exact inverse relationship between the underlying asset and the ETF price.

This article What Caterpillar’s Big Drop in Earnings Means for the General Stock Market was originally published at Investment Contrarians