Clive Maund: The Mining Sector Resembles a Somme Battlefield

Source: Special to The Gold Report (10/7/13)

http://www.theaureport.com/pub/na/clive-maund-the-mining-sector-resembles-a-somme-battlefield

Technical trader Clive Maund, the force behind CliveMaund.com, tells The Gold Report that the prolonged naked shorting of precious metals stocks has been immensely destructive to the sector and has left a battlefield littered with corpses, like the first day of the Battle of the Somme. The silver lining: He believes his charts are showing a Head-and-Shoulders bottom, which could signal an excellent entry point. That is good news for the companies Maund highlights, which he believes are strong enough to survive the onslaught.

The Gold Report: Clive, please tell us how market quantification techniques can help investors predict reasonable points of entry and exit in the precious metals stocks.

Clive Maund: The goal of what you call quantification techniques is to identity undervaluation and oversold conditions; the greater the undervaluation and the deeper the oversold condition, the more probable it is that a stock will advance after it has been purchased. Sound fundamental analysis will highlight the former and needs to be undertaken with an awareness that many companies will obfuscate their true financial state, or even plain lie about it; traditional tried and tested technical analysis (charting) techniques will identify the latter.

TGR: What about holding onto gold bullion and silver ingots? How does buying or selling the real thing compare to buying and selling precious metal stocks from your point of view?

CM: Nothing beats holding gold bullion and silver ingots. Quite apart from the psychological benefit of being in possession of physical gold and silver, which leads to a feeling of well-being and security that I am quite sure translates into improved health, the fact is that you have your hands on real money. In a sense the paper value of this real money is irrelevant; it is the paper that is intrinsically worthless at the end of the day, not physical gold and silver.

Seasoned holders of gold bullion and silver ingots know that they can ignore the blizzard of fiat swirling around them—it’s only the little guy who sits nervously on the edge of his chair watching the price of gold and silver in fiat currency. In this sense gold and silver are as solid as a rock. The purpose of investing in or trading precious metals stocks is to leverage the potential gains of gold or silver measured in fiat, and it is much more risky as individually they can collapse into worthlessness as gold or silver never can. If you aren’t buying precious metals stocks with the aim of leveraging potential gains in gold and silver, you would be better off buying the metals themselves.

TGR: Are we currently looking at an optimum entry point for buying precious metal stocks? If so, why? How can buying precious metals stocks be justified in a situation where gold and silver prices have fallen so hard and fast this year?

CM: I believe that we are. Gold and silver have been sidelined over the past couple of years as a result of hot money piling into markets that have been driven higher by unbridled expansion of fiat currency, notably the stock market and real estate. The competitive devaluation of currencies has continued at breakneck speed. The Federal Reserve, which should have been setting an example, is leading the charge with its doomed and irresponsible policy of quantitative easing (QE), which is the fraudulent dilution of the currency.

The key point to grasp here is that we are way past the point of no return. Especially in the U.S., the Fed has no choice but to continue with QE or even to expand it. The talk of “tapering” is a red herring, designed to create trading opportunities for its cronies as the masses hang on to the Fed’s every utterance. The fact is that if the Fed really did try to taper, the economy and stock market would go cold turkey and implode, and it knows it. Once markets really grasp that money supply expansion is here to stay and is going to accelerate, then there is no other way for gold and silver to go but up.

Any attempt to manipulate gold and silver prices lower by powerful plutocratic entities is doomed to fail as the paper market will be made increasingly irrelevant and sidelined by intensifying physical buying. I believe that physical buying will eventually curb manipulative forces by arbitraging away the gap between paper and physical prices, or at least putting a limit on it. In other words, if the physical price continues to rise, then the paper price will be dragged higher, possibly kicking and screaming as the manipulators dig their heels in. But they cannot stop the inevitable.

Here’s another point: The extent to which manipulators have been successful in driving gold and silver prices down in the recent past is a measure of how big a bargain they are now, and of their potential for recovery as the money supply expansion and competitive devaluation continue inexorably.

TGR: What is the role of public opinion in moving precious metal share prices up and down?

CM: Public opinion is of crucial importance, because the public, en masse, is always wrong. What matters is the level of public bullishness, or as now, bearishness, and its trend. The public has been extremely bearish toward gold and silver in recent months, which is a sign of an important bottom. The public is starting to get less bearish, so we have a rising trend, but are certainly not yet bullish. We have a lot more upside yet before the public is so bullish that we need to worry about a potential top reversal.

TGR: What is the effect of large investment firms shorting precious metals?

CM: The prolonged naked shorting of the precious metals stocks has been immensely destructive to the sector and has left a battlefield littered with corpses, like the first day of the Battle of the Somme. This naked shorting is, of course, a scam, as firms can bombard a stock in a weak market environment until it collapses like a self-fulfilling prophecy, and then move in and cover its shorts on the cheap. The regulators have been turning a blind eye to this and we must wonder why that is.

The bright side of this of course is that when the dust settles at the end of the sector downtrend, the surviving companies can pick themselves up, dust themselves off and look around at a world in which much of the competition has been eliminated, before they notice a great hulking predator standing right behind them waiting to gobble them up for their assets, which is also good for shareholders at this point, of course.

TGR: What are your charts telling you about gold and silver now?

CM: We are seeing strong evidence that gold and silver are completing major reversal patterns, which are taking the form of Head-and-Shoulders bottoms. These reversal patterns have been accompanied by the classic diminution of downside volume on each successive drop, which is characteristic of valid Head-and-Shoulders bottoms and indicative of the exhaustion of selling pressure. At this point the prices of both gold and silver are believed to be marking out the Right Shoulder lows of their respective patterns, and we have all the accompanying mood of gloom and doom and despondency toward the sector that is music to the ears of the true contrarian, who recognizes it as the dark before the dawn.

We can see these completing Head-and-Shoulders patterns to advantage on the 1-year charts for gold and silver shown below. If this interpretation is correct, then it is obvious that we are at an excellent entry point for the sector from a price/time perspective right now. It’s a great time to load up on gold and silver themselves, of course, and also gold and silver ETFs and the better precious metals stocks, and for those who want more leverage, calls in the sector.

TGR: What gold and silver companies are best weathering the storm? And how are they doing it, if they are? You have written that shares in Barrick Gold Corp. (ABX:TSX; ABX:NYSE), McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX:TSX; MUX:NYSE ) and Silver Wheaton Corp. (SLW:TSX; SLW:NYSE) are moving on an upward slope, whereas others are not doing as well in the markets. Do you have any firms that you think are the strongest picks right now?

CM: Companies that have weathered the storm best are the ones that have the strongest balance sheets and a high asset-to-debt ratio. The ones that have been in the most desperate position are the ones that have had to keep going, cap in hand, to the markets for more cash. Relentless stock dilutions have soured investors toward these stocks and driven their prices relentlessly lower so that many have a high number of shares in issue and now lack credibility, and are on the verge of going under.

In looking for opportunities in the sector, investors should “keep it simple”—look for a strong balance sheet with cash in the bank, strictly controlled costs, a transparent accountable management (that’ll be the day!), and proven assets in the ground. The best stocks are those that are either producers or set to go into production in the foreseeable future.

One of the biggest problems is management. Management incompetence and corruption has destroyed countless mining companies over the past several years, even those which, had it not been for management, would have had a bright future. At the risk of sounding quaintly old-fashioned, the trick is to find companies whose management is dedicated primarily to making the company a profitable concern, rather than to siphoning money out of the company and into their own bank accounts via inflated salaries and other freebies, and living the high life with endless junkets, meetings which accomplish little and expensive trips. Human nature being what it is, this is a tall order.

Getting more specific and starting with the ones you mention, Barrick has had some serious problems with its huge Pascua Lama project in the high Andes on the Argentina-Chile border. Management members would have been well advised to put some boots on and take a little more oxygen when they went there. That said, however, this has been priced into the stock that took a beating on the recent write-down, which was why we recommended the stock and its options on the site a while back. Barrick stock appears to be in the late stages of a fine Head-and-Shoulders bottom.

We must keep in mind that McEwen Mining was created by Robert McEwen, the person who startedGoldcorp Inc. (G:TSX; GG:NYSE) from scratch and brought it up to being the second biggest gold mining company in the world, so the potential here is obvious. We went for McEwen on the site before it leapt in August. It too looks as if it is completing a base pattern and is cheap here at about $2.50/share, compared to when it peaked in 2011 at over $9.50/share.

Silver Wheaton, which has loads of silver, is an obvious play on an increase in the silver price. The solid fundamentals of Silver Wheaton are reflected in the fact that the price hasn’t reacted back all that much, considering what has happened to most other stocks during the same period. It too looks like it is picking itself up out of a base pattern, and unless management does something really stupid, it should perform well as silver gains upside momentum.

Both Goldcorp and Yamana Gold Inc. (YRI:TSX; AUY:NYSE; YAU:LSE) look as if they are in the late stages of basing patterns and are at good entry points.

Gold Resource Corp. (GORO:NYSE.MKT; GORO:OTCBB; GIH:FSE) is intriguing here. It has taken a brutal hammering over the past year or so, dropping from about $26/share to around $6.70/share, but over a week ago it put in a large “bull hammer” at a new low on huge volume, so while this is admittedly bottom fishing, it could be very close to a final low here as the price has just drifted back near the low of the hammer.

Scorpio Gold Corp. (SGN:TSX.V), which has been stomped into the dirt over the past several years, saw immense buying some days back, which drove its volume indicators through the roof. This is looking like a most attractive, if speculative, play at this juncture.

The two old silver stalwarts, Coeur Mining Inc. (CDM:TSX; CDE:NYSE) and Hecla Mining Co. (HL:NYSE)are also looking as if they are at good entry points here, although I would like to see improvement in upside volume in both of them, which has been weak in the recent past.

TGR: How are acquisitions working out this year for the precious metals companies? Goldcorp, for example, acquired Wheaton River Minerals Ltd. Any other gold or silver firms making acquisitions that you find favorable? How long will the basement prices last, if history is an indication of cyclical movements?

CM: I can only make general comments, as I do not know the details of recent acquisitions. You will recall me saying earlier that the mining sector now looks like the battlefield after the first day of the Somme, with losses aggravated by relentless naked shorting, which has resulted in the failure of many companies. The key point here is that the mining sector is not going to cease to exist.

As we know, mining costs have continued to rise substantially in recent years. If you have a situation where many mining companies are put out of business by being put in a vice between a combination of a falling price for their product and an inability to raise capital to continue operations, then it is obvious that a shortage of gold and silver will develop in the future. This is especially true in our current situation, where we have high physical demand, which is growing rapidly in Asia where the precious metals are much more highly regarded as a store of wealth than in the tired old West.

The resulting shortage must eventually lead to higher prices, which would lead to higher prices still as investors, seeing the new uptrend, pile in again to take advantage of it. From all this it is clear that with the precious metals sector still flat on its back, there has almost never been a better time for heavy hitters to go mopping up the better stocks and properties on the cheap.

The key point here is that companies are going after assets in the ground to add to their inventories, and they are seriously cheap now given the drubbing that most stocks have suffered. That’s what matters—the more proven gold and silver a company has in the ground, the more attractive it is. As for timing, the time is now; the sector appears to be in the late stages of basing.

What about the worst-case scenario, where say the Fed pulls the plug and we experience serious deflation? In this scenario gold might fall in price, but because it will probably fall a lot less fast than just about everything else, you should still do all right.

TGR: Do you have any particular firms that you like in the Americas?

CM: The key point about companies in the Americas is that you need to avoid stocks in companies that are heavily invested in risky countries like Argentina and Bolivia. Argentina has become a very risky place to invest. The current government of Cristina Kirchner there first nationalized (grabbed) the pension savings of its citizens several years back. Then it grabbed the assets of the Spanish company Repsol a year or two ago, and the latest is that it in effect kicked LAN Argentina Airlines out of the country a month or so ago, by telling it that it can no longer use its hanger at Aeroparque in Buenos Aires, despite it having a contract to use it until 2023. You get the picture? A company can think that it owns a mine, and if the government feels like it, it can simply turn up and take it and boot the company out of the country. Small wonder that Argentina has the worst inflation rate in the world at about 25% or more. That is not a place to do business.

Likewise, Evo Morales, the leader of Bolivia, is not exactly fond of “capitalists,” so you could invest there only to find out later that the government wants in—and wants you out.

TGR: Thank you for your insights.

Clive Maund has been president of www.clivemaund.com, a successful resource sector website, since its inception in 2003. He has 30 years of experience in technical analysis and has worked for banks, commodity brokers and stockbrokers in the City of London. He holds a diploma in technical analysis from the UK Society of Technical Analysts. He lives in southern Chile.

Want to read more Gold Report interviews like this? Sign up for our free e-newsletter, and you’ll learn when new articles have been published. To see a list of recent interviews with industry analysts and commentators, visit our Streetwise Interviews page.

DISCLOSURE:

1) Goldcorp Inc. is not affiliated with The Gold Report. Streetwise Reports does not accept stock in exchange for its services or as sponsorship payment.

2) Clive Maund: I or my family own shares of the following companies mentioned in this interview: None. I personally or my family am paid by the following companies mentioned in this interview: None. My company has a financial relationship with the following companies mentioned in this interview: None. I was not paid by Streetwise Reports for participating in this interview. Comments and opinions expressed are my own comments and opinions. I had the opportunity to review the interview for accuracy as of the date of the interview and am responsible for the content of the interview.

3) Interviews are edited for clarity. Streetwise Reports does not make editorial comments or change experts’ statements without their consent.

4) The interview does not constitute investment advice. Each reader is encouraged to consult with his or her individual financial professional and any action a reader takes as a result of information presented here is his or her own responsibility. By opening this page, each reader accepts and agrees to Streetwise Reports’ terms of use and full legal disclaimer.

5) From time to time, Streetwise Reports LLC and its directors, officers, employees or members of their families, as well as persons interviewed for articles and interviews on the site, may have a long or short position in securities mentioned and may make purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market or otherwise.

Streetwise – The Gold Report is Copyright © 2013 by Streetwise Reports LLC. All rights are reserved. Streetwise Reports LLC hereby grants an unrestricted license to use or disseminate this copyrighted material (i) only in whole (and always including this disclaimer), but (ii) never in part.

Streetwise Reports LLC does not guarantee the accuracy or thoroughness of the information reported.

Streetwise Reports LLC receives a fee from companies that are listed on the home page in the In This Issue section. Their sponsor pages may be considered advertising for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1734.

Participating companies provide the logos used in The Gold Report. These logos are trademarks and are the property of the individual companies.

101 Second St., Suite 110

Petaluma, CA 94952

Tel.: (707) 981-8999

Fax: (707) 981-8998

Email: [email protected]

 

 

Western Analysts Bearish Gold, Chinese Imports Show Another 100-Tonne Month

London Gold Market Report
from Adrian Ash
BullionVault
Tues 8 Oct 08:30 EST

The PRICE of gold halved yesterday’s gains in London trade Tuesday morning, slipping below $1320 per ounce as European stock markets extended their drop and the US government shutdown continued.

 Silver fell less than gold, edging back towards $22.20 from a new 3-week high hit overnight at $22.46 per ounce.

 A new ABC/Washington Post poll says 70% of US voters “disapprove of how the Republicans in Congress are handling the budget negotiations,” with the October 17th deadline for potential US debt default drawing nearer.

 The VIX volatility index on S&P 500 stockmarket options yesterday jumped by 15%, the sharpest 1-day move since June.

 Analysis from London market-maker Scotia Mocatta said Monday night the bank’s New York desk is “currently neutral” despite yesterday’s 1.2% gain, “but would view it as a positive development if gold holds key support at $1273.”

 “Potential is for a fresh sell-off to materialise soon,” counters analysis from fellow market-making bank UBS.

 “The bearish outlook remains intact…We expect the yellow metal to test the crucial support at $1180.50, the June 28 low, over the coming days.”

 Even as gold rose 3.7% vs. the Dollar in August, gold bullion imports to China from Hong Kong topped 100 tonnes, net of exports, for the fourth month running new data showed today.

 Former No.1 consumer nation India imported only 100 tonnes over July, August and September combined, says local managing director for market-development group the World Gold Council, P.R. Somasundaram.

 “Gold recovered in a weak US-Dollar environment [with] few assuring economic data,” says the latest Precious Metals Update from German-based refining group Heraeus.

 “Still, the short-lived dip in prices led to an increased demand for gold investment bars.”

 Focusing on the developed West in contrast, “The investment case for gold relies on the expectation of rising inflation,” says analysis from investment bank and bullion market-maker J.P.Morgan, “which in turn relies on growth.

 “Yet the US shutdown is damaging US growth, both in direct terms through the furlough of 800,000 government employees and through a host of indirect channels.”

 Yesterday’s move in the gold price came in very quiet trade, with volume in US Comex gold futures reaching barely 98,000 contracts – some 60% of the last month’s average turnover.

 “We will stay supported,” reckons brokerage Marex Spectron’s head of precious metals David Govett, “as long as the US keeps playing brinkmanship with itself and as the deadline for the debt ceiling approaches.

 “[But] interest in the market is pretty low. Once this farce is out of the way, I think we head lower.”

Adrian Ash

BullionVault

Gold price chart, no delay | Buy gold online

 

Adrian Ash is head of research at BullionVault, the secure, low-cost gold and silver market for private investors online, where you can fully allocated bullion already vaulted in your choice of London, New York, Singapore, Toronto or Zurich for just 0.5% commission.

 

(c) BullionVault 2013

Please Note: This article is to inform your thinking, not lead it. Only you can decide the best place for your money, and any decision you make will put your money at risk. Information or data included here may have already been overtaken by events – and must be verified elsewhere – should you choose to act on it.

 

 

Indonesia holds rates, sees inflation returning to target

By www.CentralBankNews.info     Indonesia’s central bank held its policy rates steady, saying it expects past rate increases and macroprudential measures to help bring down the current account deficit “to a more healthy level” while inflation is expected to return to the target.
    Bank Indonesia (BI), which has raised its benchmark BI rate four times this year by a total of 150 basis points to limit the fall in the rupiah currency, held the BI rate steady at 7.25 percent, the lending rate at 7.25 percent and the deposit rate at 5.50 percent. All three rates were raised by 25 basis points in September.
    The central bank expects the global economy to continue to slow and is characterized by a high degree of uncertainty, putting pressure on the country’s exports. In the third quarter, Indonesia’s economy is expected to expand by 5.6 percent, down from 5.8 percent in the second and 6.03 percent in the first quarter.
   For the full year, Indonesia’s Gross Domestic Product is still forecast to expand by 5.5-5.9 percent.
    Next year, the economy is expected to improve, growing between 5.8 and 6.2 percent. Last month Bank Indonesia cut its growth forecasts for this year and next.

    Indonesia’s inflation rate picked up sharply in recent months following the government’s increase of subsidized fuel prices by an average of 33 percent in June and the central bank said it still expects average inflation this year to hit 9.0-9.8 percent before easing toward the bank’s range of 4.5 percent, plus/minus one percentage point in 2014.
    In September Indonesia’s headline inflation rate eased to 8.4 percent from 8.79 percent in August, in line with the central bank’s expectation that inflation will slowly return to normal from September.
    The depreciation of Indonesia’s rupiah has also increased inflationary pressures but the currency has recently started to stabilize after slowly falling in mid-May with the fall accelerating from mid-July.
    The central bank said the depreciation was mainly due to sentiment surrounding the expected tapering of asset purchases by the U.S. Federal Reserve against the background of a relatively high current account deficit.
   In the third quarter the rupiah weakened by an average of 8.18 percent to the U.S. dollar from the second quarter. The rupiah was quoted at 11.163 to the dollar today, up from 11,580 at the end of September but down 16 percent from the start of the year.
    “Bank Indonesia views the exchange rate at the moment as describing the condition of Indonesia’s economic fundamentals,” the central bank said.
    Indonesia’s current account, which grew to $9.850 billion in the second quarter from $5.270 billion in the first quarter, is expected to narrow in the third quarter due to lower imports from weaker domestic demand and the impact of the weaker rupiah, the central bank said.
    The Federal Reserve’s delayed tapering of asset purchases last month, a greater surplus in the capital account, a re-entry of foreign investors and reduced selling of domestic stocks helped boost foreign reserves to $95.7 billion at the end of September from $93.0 billion end-August, the equivalent of 5.2 months of imports.
   
    www.CentralBankNews.info

Crude Oil Prices Trades Flat; US Shutdown In Focus

By HY Markets Forex Blog

Crude oil prices were seen trading flat during the late Asian trading hours on Tuesday, while investors continue to focus on the US government shutdown.

The West Texas Intermediate crude dropped 0.09%, trading at $102.94 a barrel at the time of writing, while the European benchmark Brent crude lost 0.22% to $109.44 a barrel.

Crude Oil Prices – US Government Shutdown

Lawmakers in the US, still haven’t budged on the budget of the world’s largest economy, which has lead to the US second week of its government shutdown, which began on October 1.

Over 800,000 federal employees have been left without pay and idle, with several federal institutions and government services closed.

The ongoing US government shutdown has affected the country’s economy and delaying the expected macroeconomic data releases, including Friday’s payrolls report.

Concerns have been raised on whether the Congress will fail to raise the country’s debt-limit before October 17.

Workers from the oil producers in the Gulf of Mexico, which includes Chevron, Marathon Oil, BHP Billiton, Petrobras and Andarco, resumed at the offshore platforms after tropical storm Karen dissipated.

The Gulf of Mexico accounts for almost 1.3 million barrels a day, almost a fifth of total US oil output.

Almost 62% of the overall production in the region, representing 866,000 barrels per day, was shut down when storm Karen occurred, the US Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement reported on Sunday.

Production at the Kashagan oilfield resumed on Sunday after a gas pipeline from D island of the field to the onshore plant was repaired after a gas leak was detected on September 25, the Oil and Gas Ministry confirmed in a statement.

China’s Growth Lowered

The World Bank lowered its growth outlook for China and the developing countries of East Asia, lowering  China’s economy growth outlook to 7.5% this year and 7.7% in 2014. The previous forecast were set at 8.3% for this year and expected to grow at 8% for 2014.

 

Visit www.hymarkets.com  today and find out more on how you can how you can trade Energy products with only $50.

The post Crude Oil Prices Trades Flat; US Shutdown In Focus appeared first on | HY Markets Official blog.

Article provided by HY Markets Forex Blog

Asian Stocks In Green While Australia’s Benchmark Dragged Lower

By HY Markets Forex Blog

Asian stocks were seen trading in green on Tuesday, while Australia’s main stock index was dragged down mainly due to the mining sector.

Asian Stocks – Japan

The Japanese benchmark Nikkei 225 advanced 0.30% higher, after trading the flat-line during the gloomy start to the session and hitting a fresh one-month low at 13,894.61, while the Topix index closed 0.22% higher at 1,150.13.

Japan’s Cabinet Office posted the Economy Watcher’s Sentiment for the country, which showed an increase of 52.8 in September compared to the previous reading of 51.2 in August, while analysts were expecting a rise of 52.2.

The Economy Watcher’s Outlook for the nation showed its first rise in five months, with a 54.2 rise in September versus 51.2 in August.

The giant electronic manufacturers Sharp dropped 2.1%, following the 8% drop in the previous session. While Japan Airlines eased 1.7%, following the company’s announcement to purchase 31 aircrafts from Airbus on Monday.

While Sony dropped 2.7% and car manufacturers Toyota Motor lost 0.3%.

Asian Stocks- China

China stocks moved higher from its lower open, assisted by HSBC China’s services Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) reaching 52.4.

Hong Kong’s Hang Seng index gained 0.94% to 23,190.00 at the time of writing, while the mainland Shanghai index rose 1.02% to 2,196.75.

The President of China Xi Jingping said that countries with major global currencies should follow dependable policies and also be careful with the changes of the monetary policy.

Australia

Australia benchmark S&P/ASX 200 index dropped 0.23% to 5,149.40, hitting a one-month low.

Newcrest Mining declined 2.26% and Evolution Mining edged 1.9% lowers.

While Korea’s Kospi index edged 0.42% higher at 2,002.76.

 

Interested in trading Asian Stocks Online?

Visit www.hymarkets.com and start trading today with only $50.

The post Asian Stocks In Green While Australia’s Benchmark Dragged Lower appeared first on | HY Markets Official blog.

Article provided by HY Markets Forex Blog

The Three Most Dangerous Stocks in the Market

By WallStreetDaily.com

When it comes to discerning the future direction of share prices, I can’t emphasize enough the importance of earnings growth.

Or, as my favorite mantra goes, “Stock prices ultimately follow earnings.”

Yet, a subscriber recently wrote in to accuse me of being overwhelmingly lopsided in my application of this golden rule of investing…

“You always focus on companies consistently earning more and more profits, which are poised for stock price appreciation. But how about focusing on some dogs – companies with declining earnings and, in turn, stock prices that are bound to hit the skids?” – Joe B.

Okay, guilty as charged. So today I’m going to rectify the situation.

With earnings season upon us, I’m sharing three stock landmines that every investor should avoid.

As you’ll see, the odds point to each company dropping by double-digit margins in the blink of an eye. And the last thing we want is to be stuck holding any of them in our portfolios.

Heck, one could detonate as early as Thursday morning at 9:30 AM…

Take heed!

A Recipe for Disaster

To identify the market’s most dangerous stocks, I focus on four key criteria:

~ Extreme Volatility: What better place to start than companies with a penchant for dramatic price swings, right? Well, each quarter, Bespoke Investment Group compiles a list of the stocks in the S&P 1500 Index that react the most violently on their earnings report days. I’m talking about single-day price swings of over 10%.

~ Negative Price Trends: Because market trends tend to persist, the next element I hone in on is year-to-date performance. Specifically, the most volatile stocks that also happen to be down in price for the year. Why? Because if a stock is already under selling pressure, the trend is likely to persist. And there’s no better trigger for the next big leg down than a bad earnings report. Speaking of which…

~ A History of Bad Earnings Surprises: Since a bad quarterly report stands to trigger a selloff, I focus on companies with track records of reporting worse-than-expected earnings. The bigger the disappointments, on average, the bigger the stock declines we can expect.

~ Souring Sentiment: Last, but not least, I screen for companies where analysts have dramatically lowered their earnings forecasts over the last 90 days. This seems obvious, but keep in mind that analysts seldom get it right… so if they’re rapidly souring on a company’s earnings prospects, chances are, they’re too late to the game and too conservative. And the actual results stand to be even worse.

Add it all up, and we have the perfect screener for companies destined to disappoint. So without further ado, here are the three most dangerous stocks heading into earnings season…

Our Top Three Earnings Season Stinkers

~ Stock Landmine #1: Crocs, Inc. (CROX): I can’t believe anyone still wears these ugly plastic shoes. But they must, as the company reported sales of more than $360 million last quarter.

Nevertheless, the future looks bleak for the stock.

First, in a strongly rising market, shares are down 5% this year.

Second, over the last 90 days, analysts slashed their earnings per share forecasts by a hefty 50% – from $0.39 to $0.18. And that sharp revision is no accident, either.

On September 10, management lowered its guidance, citing weaker-than-expected sales in the Americas. But even after lowering guidance, I’m convinced that the company is still going to come up short this quarter.

While analysts still expect the company to report earnings per share of $0.18, that’s the high end of the company’s guidance. So unless there was some end-of-summer rush for ugly footwear, there’s no chance the company puts up better-than-expected numbers. And consider that, in the last quarter, Crocs missed expectations by 25%.

Bottom line: With an average one-day price change of 12.02% on earnings days, look out below when Crocs reports results on October 24.

~ Stock Landmine #2: Gibraltar Industries, Inc. (ROCK): Bank of America (BAC) might be bullish on the industrials sector, but Gibraltar is the exception. The company has significant customer concentration without long-term contracts, weak pricing power and sizeable foreign currency risk.

Plus, with the stock already down 13% so far this year, analysts have chopped their earnings projections by 34% over the last 90 days.

The company is prone to missing expectations by a wide margin, too. Case in point: Two quarters ago, the company’s earnings per share tumbled almost 70% below consensus estimates.

To top it off, the stock averages a one-day price change of 10.3% on earnings report days.

Bottom line: An investment in ROCK is anything but rock solid. I wouldn’t leave any of my hard-earned capital on the line when the company reports results on October 31.

~ Stock Landmine #3: Ruby Tuesday, Inc. (RT): I confess, I may be a tad biased against this dining chain. I had a bad experience a decade ago, and could never muster the courage to eat there again.

However, aside from my hellish night of food poisoning, this isn’t a revenge mission. There are strong, fundamental reasons to expect a disappointment when the company reports its results after the bell on Wednesday.

The stock is already down 4% on the year, and investors are reacting to the company’s weak sales figures, which prompted analysts to cut their earnings per share forecasts over the last 90 days from a profit of $0.08 per share to a loss of $0.05. (Ouch!)

Now consider that the company has missed expectations by an average of 17.5% over the last four quarters. That means it’s likely to report bigger losses than analysts expect.

Bottom line: An average price swing of 10.8% on earnings report days makes this one stock we should promptly remove from our menu.

That’s it for today. Hope my pessimism satisfies you, Joe!

Ahead of the tape,

Louis Basenese

The post The Three Most Dangerous Stocks in the Market appeared first on Wall Street Daily.

Article By WallStreetDaily.com

Original Article: The Three Most Dangerous Stocks in the Market

Two Old Restaurant Stocks Offer Investors Growth

By Profit Confidential

Two Old Restaurant Stocks Offer Investors GrowthThe last time we looked at Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) in this column, the company was trading around $400.00 a share after blowing away Wall Street estimates in its second quarter.

The company’s numbers were excellent with 2013 second-quarter sales growth of 18% to $817 million, a 5.5% gain in comparable restaurant sales, and earnings-per-share growth of 10% to $2.82 a share.

In the second quarter, the company opened 44 new restaurants for a total of 1,502. Company management said that it expects comparable restaurant sales to be in the low to mid-single digits this year on between 165 and 180 net new locations.

Wall Street earnings estimates for Chipotle have mostly been going up for this fiscal year, but especially for 2014.

In its second quarter, expenses increased significantly, especially in the cost of food products. Company management cited higher costs for chicken and dairy products, and even for salsa due to a shortage of tomatillo in Mexico.

Labor costs as a percentage of revenues actually dropped compared to the second quarter of 2012, and so did occupancy costs.

Historically, Chipotle typically experiences lower average daily restaurant sales in the first and fourth quarters of the calendar year, due to the weather and holidays. In its upcoming financial report, the Street expects the company to generate approximately 22% in earnings growth and approximately 17% in quarterly sales growth.

Naturally, the stock is expensively priced because of this. Last year’s third quarter produced solid revenue growth of 18% to $700 million and diluted earnings per share grew 19.5% to $2.27 a share on comparable restaurant sales growth of 4.8%.

While the stock is pricey with a trailing price-to-earnings ratio of around 45, the company is providing genuine economic growth for investors. (See “New Restaurant Stocks Plentiful, but This Old Name Delivers.”)

The stock is trading right at its 52-week high and is close to its record price high set in April 2012.

Restaurant companies regularly experience operational issues that aren’t often related to general consumer spending. Changing consumer tastes and price wars can wreak havoc on operating margins. However, the equity market has proven that restaurant stocks are good wealth creators, and investors should always consider the sector as part of a diversified portfolio.

Right now, there’s value among a few struggling chains. Darden Restaurants, Inc. (DRI) is not a Wall Street favorite right now, but the stock is reasonably priced, and the company’s dividend yield is nearly five percent.

All it takes is one strong turnaround quarter for Darden and investors will pile in. It happened to Chipotle in the third quarter last year. However, it will probably take longer for Darden, but the position definitely offers value.

In this stock market, I favor existing winners.

Chipotle reports its third-quarter earnings on October 17.

Article by profitconfidential.com

Update: Apple’s Attempt to Enter Emerging Markets a Blunder?

By Profit Confidential

Update: Apple’s Attempt to Enter Emerging Markets a BlunderWhen the next-generation Apple Inc. (NASDAQ/AAPL) “iPhone 5S” and “iPhone 5C” were launched in mid-September, the company reported record sales over its first weekend of selling.

But there was a problem: the majority of the sales were for the iPhone 5S, while sales of the iPhone 5C lagged. The problem was the cost of the plastic-cased 5C; at around $100.00 with a two-year contract, the “cheaper” version simply cost too much, especially for the emerging markets like China, where Apple had high hopes for the iPhone 5C.

Obviously, the initial demand for the iPhone 5C over the first few weeks appears to be disappointing. Best Buy Co., Inc. (NYSE/BBY) announced it was cutting the price of the 5C to $50.00 on a two-year contract between October 3 and October 7.

But while the discount was only for four days, you kind of wonder if there will be a more permanent price cut ordered by Apple should sales lag.

The iPhone 5S is selling very well, but for Apple to really break out of its shell, the company will need to cut the cost of the iPhone 5C in order to get a foothold in the emerging markets.

Without a major price cut, it will not be easy for Apple to break into a mobile market that focuses on attractively priced smartphones—a market that includes established rivals, such as Nokia Corporation (NYSE/NOK), whose mobile assets are to be acquired by Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ/MSFT), Samsung Electronics Company Ltd., LG Corporation, and major upstarts, such as Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. and ZTE Corporation, based out of China.

For Apple, the massive mobile market in China is what the company desperately aims to grow. The company’s current market share in China is insignificant and lags behind both the domestic and foreign makers.

So far, an official distribution deal with China Mobile Limited (NYSE/CHL), the largest cell phone operator in China with 500 million-plus users, has yet to materialize and this is worrisome. Apple needs China, especially a deal with China Mobile.

Until Apple can make some ground in China and other massive cell phone sectors in the emerging markets, such as India, Asia, and Latin America, the company will only be regarded as tops domestically. With the U.S. mobile market being only a small fraction of the global market, Apple will need international success.

In my view, I would be hesitant to buy Apple now unless there are developments in China. One contrarian play in the smartphone market to consider might be Microsoft, if its deal to buy the mobile assets of Nokia is approved. (Read “Why I Like Microsoft’s Proposed Acquisition of Nokia’s Cell Phone Business.”)

Article by profitconfidential.com

Beware of the Bear Dressed Up as a Bull

By Profit Confidential

Income is the largest factor when it comes to determining changes in the consumer spending. Unfortunately, personal income is declining in the U.S. economy—not a good indicator; no matter how anyone tries to spin it.

In the first eight months of 2012, the average change in real personal disposable income (income adjusted for price change) in the U.S. economy was 0.11%. In the first eight months of this year, real personal disposable income has actually contracted by 0.4%. (Source: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis web site, last accessed October 4, 2013.)

As real disposable income pulls back, we are seeing the effects of slow consumer spending starting to emerge.

Total light vehicle sales by the automakers in the U.S. economy declined 4.2% in September compared to the same period a year ago. Passenger car sales declined 5.6% in the month. Automakers like General Motors Company (NYSE/GM) saw their total car sales fall 17.1% in September from the same period in 2012. (Source: Autodata, October 1, 2013.)

Another indicator of slowing consumer spending, crude oil inventories are increasing. For the week ended September 27, the Energy Information Administration reported that there was a build-up of 363.7 million barrels of crude oil in the U.S. economy. The agency reiterated these inventory levels are “toward the upper range for this time of the year.” (Source: Energy Information Administration, October 2, 2013.) When there’s less consumer spending, or companies are producing less, then fewer barrels of crude oil are used.

And worst of all, 19 companies in the consumer discretionary sector of the S&P 500 have issued negative guidance about their corporate earnings for the third quarter. (Source: FactSet, September 30, 2013.) This is roughly 23% of all the companies in the sector. (Source: S&P Dow Jones Indices, September 30, 2013.) The consumer discretionary sector is very dependent on consumer spending. Companies in this sector see the trends in consumer spending long before anyone, because they are very close to the customers. If they are warning about future profitability, something isn’t right when it comes to consumer spending.

Mainstream outlets are too focused on the debt ceiling debate and the U.S. government shutdown. Few are talking about consumer spending, which can actually change the fate of the U.S. economy going forward. We are fixated on quantitative easing, which helps out the big banks and Wall Street, but not the average American Joe. And optimism among stock advisors is growing again. The reality of what’s going on in the economy, dear reader, is very different from the picture the stock market paints. Beware of the bear dressed up as a bull.

What He Said:

“The Real Threat to the Economy: U.S. retail sales are falling, the producer price index is crashing, house prices, car prices are all falling—and no one is talking about deflation but me. Fed governors are still talking about inflation—they’ve got it wrong. There’s no need for me to get into the dangers of deflation as I’ve written about them (many times) before. Let’s just put it this way: Deflation is about the worst economic state a country will experience. The risks to the U.S. economy in 2007 are greater than I’ve seen in years.” Michael Lombardi in Profit Confidential, November 15, 2006. Michael was one of the first to warn of deflation. By late 2008, world economies were embedded in their worst state of deflation since the Great Depression.

Article by profitconfidential.com

To See How It All Turns Out, Here’s What Happened in Japan

By Profit Confidential

What Happened in JapanIf you want to see how this all turns out in the end, I’m talking about the Federal Reserve’s program of printing over $1.0 trillion a year in new paper money (something that’s never happened in history), we need not look any further than the Japanese economy.

Why? Because the Japanese economy collapsed about 15 years before our credit crisis collapse of 2008. What we are doing now (artificially low interest rates, deep government debt, and money printing), the Japanese did years ago.

But unfortunately, when I compare the “Japanese experiment” to what our government and central bank are doing now, I don’t like what I see. In fact, I question the long-term benefits and effectiveness of quantitative easing.

Did quantitative easing help the Japanese economy? Turns out the answer is, NO. Since 1990, when troubles in the Japanese economy began, until 2011, the average annual growth rate (as measured by GDP) of the third biggest nation in the global economy has been less than 1.1%. (Source: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis web site, last accessed October 4, 2013.) In 2012, the Japanese economy didn’t perform so well and fell back into recession.

This year, the Japanese economy grew one percent in the first quarter and then declined to 0.9% in the second. (Source: Trading Economics web site, last accessed October 4, 2013.) Albeit a generalization, if quantitative easing and low interest rates were working, the Japanese economy would not be suffering like it is.

Which investments made money for the investors in the Japanese economy during its post-boom era? To say the very least, just don’t count on the stock market.

While the American stock market has moved slightly above its 2007 boom-time peaks, the main stock market in the Japanese economy has done horribly. The main index in the country, the Nikkei, is well below its record high, as the chart below illustrates.

NIKK Tokyo Nikkei Average Chart

Chart courtesy of www.StockCharts.com

Since its peak in 1990, the Nikkei is still down about 60%.

Last month, we heard the U.S. Federal Reserve won’t be slowing down on its quantitative easing. The Federal Reserve said it will start to slow quantitative easing when the unemployment rate in the U.S. economy reaches 6.5% and the inflation expectation increases above two percent—two events that can be more than one year away, if not more.

Earnings growth for U.S. corporations is running at its lowest pace in four years, while revenue growth is almost non-existent. The mirage called the stock market in the U.S. economy is running on newly printed money; the rally will only go so long as the easy money continues to flow.

Michael’s Personal Notes:

Income is the largest factor when it comes to determining changes in the consumer spending. Unfortunately, personal income is declining in the U.S. economy—not a good indicator; no matter how anyone tries to spin it.

In the first eight months of 2012, the average change in real personal disposable income (income adjusted for price change) in the U.S. economy was 0.11%. In the first eight months of this year, real personal disposable income has actually contracted by 0.4%. (Source: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis web site, last accessed October 4, 2013.)

As real disposable income pulls back, we are seeing the effects of slow consumer spending starting to emerge.

Total light vehicle sales by the automakers in the U.S. economy declined 4.2% in September compared to the same period a year ago. Passenger car sales declined 5.6% in the month. Automakers like General Motors Company (NYSE/GM) saw their total car sales fall 17.1% in September from the same period in 2012. (Source: Autodata, October 1, 2013.)

Another indicator of slowing consumer spending, crude oil inventories are increasing. For the week ended September 27, the Energy Information Administration reported that there was a build-up of 363.7 million barrels of crude oil in the U.S. economy. The agency reiterated these inventory levels are “toward the upper range for this time of the year.” (Source: Energy Information Administration, October 2, 2013.) When there’s less consumer spending, or companies are producing less, then fewer barrels of crude oil are used.

And worst of all, 19 companies in the consumer discretionary sector of the S&P 500 have issued negative guidance about their corporate earnings for the third quarter. (Source: FactSet, September 30, 2013.) This is roughly 23% of all the companies in the sector. (Source: S&P Dow Jones Indices, September 30, 2013.) The consumer discretionary sector is very dependent on consumer spending. Companies in this sector see the trends in consumer spending long before anyone, because they are very close to the customers. If they are warning about future profitability, something isn’t right when it comes to consumer spending.

Mainstream outlets are too focused on the debt ceiling debate and the U.S. government shutdown. Few are talking about consumer spending, which can actually change the fate of the U.S. economy going forward. We are fixated on quantitative easing, which helps out the big banks and Wall Street, but not the average American Joe. And optimism among stock advisors is growing again. The reality of what’s going on in the economy, dear reader, is very different from the picture the stock market paints. Beware of the bear dressed up as a bull.

What He Said:

“The Real Threat to the Economy: U.S. retail sales are falling, the producer price index is crashing, house prices, car prices are all falling—and no one is talking about deflation but me. Fed governors are still talking about inflation—they’ve got it wrong. There’s no need for me to get into the dangers of deflation as I’ve written about them (many times) before. Let’s just put it this way: Deflation is about the worst economic state a country will experience. The risks to the U.S. economy in 2007 are greater than I’ve seen in years.” Michael Lombardi in Profit Confidential, November 15, 2006. Michael was one of the first to warn of deflation. By late 2008, world economies were embedded in their worst state of deflation since the Great Depression.

Article by profitconfidential.com