How Many Warren Buffett’s in a Bar of Gold?

By MoneyMorning.com.au

As you should know by now, we’ve got a fairly simple view on gold.

Don’t fuss around with it.

Don’t dwell over when you should buy it.

Just buy it and be done with it.

But that doesn’t mean we aren’t interested in gold and the gold market. From time to time something catches our eye.

That happened yesterday. It reminded us of a way to help tell the end of the gold bear market…and Warren Buffett’s role in determining it…

Yesterday the World Gold Council released its quarterly Gold Demand Trends report.

Given the absolutely brutal performance of gold in recent months, we were keen to flick through it soon after it arrived in our inbox.

To be honest, for most of the past three years we’ve barely paid any attention to this quarterly report. But this time we thought it was worth at least a few minutes of our time.

And we’re glad we did because we were stunned by what we read…

Selling Paper Gold to Buy Real Gold

We’ve cut the following table from the report and circled the key numbers. What it shows you is that total gold bar and coin demand hit 507.6 tonnes during the quarter.

By contrast the demand from gold exchange-traded funds (ETFs) was -402.2 tonnes. In other words, the ETFs were net sellers of gold:


Source: World Gold Council

The fact that ETFs were net sellers doesn’t surprise us. Especially when we read the latest news about famed hedge fund manager John Paulson selling half his fund’s holding in the main US gold ETF.

What really stunned us was the size of the physical bar and coin demand. We knew from personal experience that there was a long line the last time we bought gold bullion about three months ago. So the figures make sense. But it still surprised us.

But that table only tells part of the story. It only gives you the numbers. It doesn’t interpret the numbers into useful information. For that you need to speak to a respected gold analyst.

That’s why we asked our old pal Greg Canavan, editor of Sound Money, Sound Investments, to chime in with his take on the numbers. Here’s what he told us:

In an ETF, you can only get access to the actual physical gold if you’re an “authorised participant”, which are generally the banks. As a small investor, an ETF only gives you “exposure” to gold. That isn’t the same as owning gold…especially if you find out the “authorised participants” have drained all the gold from the ETF and you can only redeem your gold “investment” in equivalent US dollars. Those stats show an increasing realisation that the recent gold price plunge was more about selling in the paper gold market, rather than the physical gold market.

Also, it shows how much actual demand there was for physical when the price fell. The bullion banks (authorised participants) are the main intermediaries in the global physical gold market. The fact they’re taking lots of gold out of the ETF’s means there is strong demand for it elsewhere. ETF’s don’t lose physical metal just because the price falls. That’s not how they work. The silver ETF, for example, has hardly shed any silver even though silver’s price performance has been much worse.

So I’d say this confirms that investors prefer real, limited supply physical gold, not abundant paper gold.

So, gold has taken a drubbing. Paper gold investors are selling out. But real gold investors are buying in. That’s the important thing. If you’re interested in buying gold at a good price, is now the time?

Gold v Stocks

For the answer to that question we had to turn to another of our old pals, Dan Denning. (We’re happy to admit that we don’t know a quarter of what these guys know about gold, and so we tap their brains for info.)

Some time ago we remembered Dan telling us that he had a different way to most people of judging when it was a good time to buy gold. He doesn’t just look at the gold price, he looks at gold’s relative price.

In this case, the price relative to stocks…and one stock in particular – Berkshire Hathaway [NYSE: BRK/B].

Berkshire Hathaway is of course billionaire investor Warren Buffett’s listed investment vehicle. Buffett is the man who famously says that gold is about as pointless an investment as you can get.

We don’t agree. But that’s by the by. The point is whether gold is now at a price that makes it worth buying when compared to stocks (Berkshire Hathaway).

As Dan sees it, it is. Dan’s view was that gold would find support when it was trading at 14-times the price of Berkshire Hathaway ‘B’ shares (currently USD$116.57 per share), but only after gold had over-corrected through that level.

It’s now at 11.9-times Berkshire ‘B’ shares as you can see on the chart below:


Source: StockCharts.com

Of course, this isn’t just about the gold price falling. It’s about stocks hitting an all-time high too.

As far as Dan is concerned, as he told us yesterday, ‘Move complete, rally to commence.

The hedge fund guys are selling big chunks of their gold ETF positions, and yet the physical gold demand has almost doubled compared to the previous year.

If you’ve put off buying gold for fear it could fall further, everything we’ve covered today could be reason enough to tempt you into the market.

Then again, as we mentioned at the top of this letter, we try not to think about gold too much…we just buy it whenever we feel like it.

Cheers,
Kris+

Join Money Morning on Google+

From the Port Phillip Publishing Library

Special Report: The Sixth Revolution

Daily Reckoning: Silver, The Devil’s Metal

Money Morning: Two Points to Consider from the Commonwealth Bank…

Pursuit of Happiness: The Next Big Leap for Transportation Technology

Australian Small-Cap Investigator:
How to Make Big Money from Small-Cap Stocks

Chapter 8: Individual Stocks v The Index

By MoneyMorning.com.au

[Ed Note:The following is an edited extract from a book Vern Gowdie wrote to his three daughters. The book’s title is A Parent’s Gift of Knowledge.]

The Australian share market has two major indices: 

  • The All Ordinaries Index 
  • The ASX 200 index 

The All Ordinaries reflects the share price movements of a larger number of shares.

The ASX 200 index reflects the movement of the top 200 companies in Australia.

The way an index works is relatively simple. The following is an example only and the values I have attributed to each company bear no resemblance to reality.

Company 

Value 

% of index 

CBA 

$50 Billion 

14% 

NAB 

$30 Billion 

  8% 

ANZ 

$35 Billion 

10% 

Westpac 

$40 Billion 

11% 

BHP 

$60 Billion 

17% 

Rio Tinto 

$40 Billion 

11% 

Telstra 

$25 Billion 

  7% 

Woolworths 

$25 Billion 

  7% 

Wesfarmers 

$30 Billion 

  8% 

Harvey Norman 

$25 Billion 

  7%  

TOTAL 

$360 Billion 

100% 

In the above example, if BHP (17%) and CBA (14%) share prices move up or down, the movement influences 31% of the index.

Sometimes when they give the share market news on TV you’ll hear things like, ‘the mining stocks helped lift the index today,’ or ‘banking shares drove the market lower.’ The sheer size of these stocks and their weighting in the index casts a huge shadow over the movement of the share index.

In my opinion the best and most economical way to invest (as opposed to speculate) in the Australian share market is to buy into an index ETF. An index ETF gives investors exposure to a broad range of stocks.

Why invest in the index (Beta investing) and not individual shares (Alpha investing)? With individual shares (buying shares in Telstra, NAB, Woolworths etc.) there are stock-specific risks and rewards. Telstra is a classic example of this.

Telecommunication usage (mobile phones, wireless internet etc.) has grown exponentially over the past decade, yet Telstra’s share price has fallen nearly 50% over the past fourteen years.

The combination of the bursting in the tech bubble euphoria and Government interference to reduce Telstra’s monopoly in the telecommunications sector created uncertainty over the company’s future profitability. And so investors re-priced Telstra’s business.

The banking sector has performed strongly over the past decade. However NAB has been relatively weak due to some poor management decisions. In Jan 2000 the NAB share price was $21.80 and is currently around $30. This is a compound growth return of 2.5% per annum.

Yet BHP, CBA and a handful of other quality companies have performed exceptionally well over the past decade. BHP was around $8 in 2000 and is currently at $37. This is an outstanding 362% return over 13 years. Not bad compared to Telstra losing 50% in value.

Individual shares can be rewarding but picking the right one is difficult and requires painstaking research. For instance, will BHP continue its stellar run for the next ten years or will Telstra be the stand out performer?

History shows this process of consistently anticipating the direction of companies is difficult over the longer term.

Therefore it’s my conclusion that over the longer term you’re better off tracking the index.

The ASX 200 index over the past thirteen years has returned approximately 65%. This isn’t particularly great when compared to BHP or CBA, but significantly better than how Telstra shareholders fared. Investing in the index reduces your reliance on an individual company to perform (alpha) and enables you to participate in the general movement of the market (beta).

The question for stock pickers is, ‘What will be the outstanding companies over the next decade?’ Foresight is a much harder task and it’s for this reason that sticking with the index enables you to participate in the general market movement.

Investing in an index still requires you to do your homework to determine whether the market is over-priced or not. Anyone who invested in the index in late 2007 at 6,700 points has lost 25% of their investment.

In 2007 the market had been in the ascendency for four straight years (2003 to 2007). Common sense and history dictated this trajectory couldn’t possibly last yet the majority of people were lured in by the fact that it had run for that long and believed it would continue.

Using past performance as a future guide is a very poor substitute for detailed analysis. This was another hard lesson to learn for market participants.

When it comes to markets, common sense isn’t so common when greed clouds your judgment.

Vern Gowdie
Editor, Gowdie Family Wealth

Join Money Morning on Google+

From the Archives…

Should You Still Buy Stocks Here? Yes, but…
09-08-2013 – Kris Sayce

The Secret to China’s $7 Billi on Milk Market
08-08-2013 – Nick Hubble

RBA (Retirees Below Average)
07-08-2013 – Vern Gowdie

Have Australian Stocks Broken Free from China?
06-08-2013 – Kris Sayce

When Should You Sell Your ‘Loser’ Stocks?
05-08-2013 – Kris Sayce

What’s Warren Buffett Buying?

By The Sizemore Letter

It’s that time again.  Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-A) released its quarterly 13F filing today, which details stock by stock what Buffett and his managers have been buying and selling.

At the top of the list?  A 17.8-million-share position in Suncor Energy (SU), Canada’s biggest oil and gas producer.  Suncor is a major producer in the Alberta oil sands, and this purchase is consistent with Buffett’s overall belief in a North American industrial renaissance.

Next is Dish Network (DISH), the satellite television provider. Berkshire Hathaway added 547,312 shares of Dish, worth about $24 million.  The relatively small size of the acquisition indicates it was probably made by one of Buffett’s lieutenants and not the Sage himself.  Still, given that Buffett’s two managers—Todd Combs and Ted Weschler—are front runners to take control of Berkshire Hathaway’s portfolio once Buffett eventually retires, the move is worth noting.

Dish is an odd addition for Berkshire Hathaway given that archrival DirecTV (DTV) is already in the portfolio and has been for a few years now.  It’s even stranger when you consider the high drama surrounding Dish and its CEO Charlie Ergen and its failed bid to purchase Sprint (S) and Clearwire for their spectrum assets.

Ergen had grand ambitions of using Sprint’s bandwidth to create something of a wireless empire that would have included paid TV, phone service, and wireless internet…which sounds great, except that he would have been entering an already crowded market in all three services.  And in any event, he got outbid.

Buffett is not known for endorsing great jumps into the unknown. Dish seems an odd addition to a generally conservative, staid portfolio.  It’s highly-indebted, not particularly cheap, and operates in an industry in the middle of a transformation with a very uncertain outcome.  I’m left scratching my head on this one.

In addition to Dish and Suncor, Buffett massively increased his position in General Motors (GM), adding about 60% to a position now worth $1.4 billion.  Like Suncor, this move is more in line with Buffett’s belief in America’s industrial future.  It’s also an established player in an old-line industry trading for a reasonable price.  Classic Buffett.

And what did Buffett sell?

He cut his positions in packaged foods companies Kraft Foods (KRFT) and Mondelez (MDLZ) to nearly zero.

Until his next letter to shareholders comes out, we’re left to speculate as to why Buffett unloaded these two.  My guess is simply that he wanted to free up cash for another big purchase.

SUBSCRIBE to Sizemore Insights via e-mail today.

Join the Sizemore Investment Letter – Premium Edition

Bull vs. Bear: Charles Sizemore and Jeff Reeves Talk Wal-Mart

By The Sizemore Letter

Watch Jeff and I duke it out over Wal-Mart’s (WMT) earnings release.

From Jeff Reeves at The Slant:

Charles Sizemore, editor of the Sizemore Investment Letter, is a good friend and a great investor. But friends often disagree — as Charles and I do on Walmart (WMT) stock and Walmart earnings.

Me, I see Walmart as a retailer in trouble. As I wrote in advance of Walmart earnings, the excuses about a cold, wet spring and income tax checks don’t mask the underlying problem of weak consumer spending at home and big investment abroad that has yet to pay off substantially for shareholders.

Walmart earnings on Thursday validated these headwinds as sales missed, the outlook was slashed and the stock fell. And in the near- to medium-term, I see continued trouble for Walmart stock.

But Charles has a different take, and a long view that places Walmart stock at the top of the market when it comes to returning capital to shareholders via dividends and buybacks. Consider for a moment that its dividend has exploded from 22 cents a quarter in 2007 to an amazing 47 cents a quarter currently — a 113% increase in just five years!

And bigger picture, Charles says the risk posed by Walmart earnings declines and sales trouble isn’t necessarily a risk that just applies Walmart but the U.S. economy generally. He notes that Walmart makes up 10% of non-auto retail sales in the U.S. and that any downturn here is in fact a reflection of the macro picture — not poor management.

As such, that shouldn’t mean underperformance since broadly the market will be feeling pressure as a result. Retail stocks from Target (TGT) to Macy’s (M) to Gap (GPS) will feel the pain, as will other stocks that rely on consumers.

I admit Charles has a good point to be made about the long-term potential, and he admits that there’s no reason to run out tomorrow and buy Walmart given the short-term headwinds.

So maybe we are both right. Or both wrong.

Time will tell!

Note from Charles: Target even trumps Wal-Mart in terms of shareholder friendliness.  Both retailers have been monster dividend raisers and share repurchasers in recent years.

SUBSCRIBE to Sizemore Insights via e-mail today.

Join the Sizemore Investment Letter – Premium Edition

Free Metals Report: Read Bob Prechter’s Big 5 Gold Warnings for Bulls and Bears

By Elliott Wave International

Gold and silver have been THE financial news in recent weeks. The coverage began during mid-April’s three-day price decline, but the real precious metals story goes back further than that. Since 2011, gold and silver have declined more than 30% and 50%, respectively. Continue reading to learn more, or get ahead of the trend by reading Bob Prechter’s Big 5 Gold Warnings for Bulls and Bears!

Read more about Prechter’s urgent report now.

Dear Investor,

Volatile price action is a surprise to most investors most of the time.

That’s definitely true of precious metals in the past 30 days. But, the real story is far bigger than just one month. In fact, gold and silver have seen declines of more than 30% and 50%, respectively, since 2011. Now that’s news!

If you invest in precious metals, you owe it to yourself to read this brand-new report, Bob Prechter’s Big 5 Gold Warnings for Bulls and Bears, from Elliott Wave International.
Inside the new report, you’ll learn the truth about:

1) Central Bank Buying
2) Fed Inflating
3) The “Crisis Hedge” Argument
4) The “Gold is Cheap” Argument
5) The Conviction that Post-Peak Lows were Support

Follow this link to learn more about Bob Prechter’s Big 5 Gold Warnings for Bulls and Bears and get your very own copy now — it’s free >>

P.S. If you follow the link above, you’ll see a stunning chart of some of EWI’s gold and silver forecasts over the past three years. When a market’s wave patterns are clear, as they are now in gold and silver, it is a remarkable sight.

See the chart now.

 

About the Publisher, Elliott Wave International
Founded in 1979 by Robert R. Prechter Jr., Elliott Wave International (EWI) is the world’s largest market forecasting firm. Its staff of full-time analysts provides 24-hour-a-day market analysis to institutional and private investors around the world.

 

Casey’s Louis James Warns: ‘Don’t Try to Time the Market’

Source: JT Long of The Gold Report (8/14/13)

http://www.theaureport.com/pub/na/caseys-louis-james-warns-dont-try-to-time-the-market

Don’t ask Louis James if the gold price has reached bottom. He doesn’t care. The senior editor with Casey Research is too busy trying to ferret out those gold miners with a bird in the hand, as he calls it in this interview with The Gold Report. He travels the world, most recently visiting Ethiopia, looking for companies with an overlooked story, an undervalued mine, an underappreciated grade. While James knows no one can time the market, he is quite certain he has found some good values.

The Gold Report: You warn investors against trying to time the market. If even experts don’t know a bottom until it’s behind them, how do regular investors know when to invest, when to buy the next tranches and when to cut losses?

Louis James: The wisdom of not trying to time the market is tried and true. Benjamin Graham said the same thing 60 years ago. I shouldn’t have to defend this premise. Even though investors all know it, they fervently wish it weren’t so; they just can’t help themselves.

You can’t time the market. A bureaucrat in Washington can open his mouth and send the price of gold up or down 5% in an afternoon.

Fortunately, we can look for value. Value tends to be slippery in the junior sector when you have a bunch of companies that, as Doug Casey famously says, are little better than burning matches. They have no income. Even the biggest players in the field are so volatile that Benjamin Graham would never touch them.

However, there are things that we can look for. We can compare companies to their peers. We can look at the ounces in the ground and see if something is out of whack. We can look at cash in the bank. The market is so beat up now that some companies with viable projects are trading for cash or less. It’s actually possible in a market this beat up to make relatively low-risk acquisitions.

TGR: You can’t really tell when to buy, but you can tell which one to buy. What’s the most important factor to look at when picking a stock?

LJ: I use Doug Casey’s “eight Ps” formula. “People” is the first “P.” The best projects can still be messed up if the wrong people run them. If you know the people involved have a track record unblemished by success, as Rick Rule likes to say, that’s absolutely a warning, regardless of how cheap the shares are. Don’t throw the fundamentals out just because it’s on sale.

In fact, investors should start with themselves when evaluating any investment. Before they start buying shares, they need to determine what kind of investors they are. Risk-adverse investors probably want to stick with the producers. Investors after potentially big gains—those tenbaggers, the 1,000% returns—have to take a chance on early-stage, high-risk speculations.

TGR: Grade is important, but how does a regular investor reading a press release or a report on test results determine which are quality projects?

LJ: Grade is king for good reason. High-grade forgives many sins and makes many things possible. People also say that size is king—that can also be true. I have been to projects that have very low grades and still make a lot of money, due to economies of scale.

Today, there’s a great deal of skepticism about low-grade bulk tonnage projects. Companies have been taking write downs on projects that haven’t worked out. Troubled projects are making headlines. There’s a sentiment that low-grade bulk tonnage is out.

Investors want high-grade, but that’s too simplistic. Large high-grade projects, like Pretium Resources Inc.’s (PVG:TSX; PVG:NYSE) Brucejack project, with its bonanza-grade Valley of the Kings zone, are very few and far between. There are not enough of those to sustain the industry.

I strongly urge readers not to throw the whole class of bulk tonnage out. You do need to be selective. If a company does a reasonable job and presents credible numbers in its economic studies, that does tell a lot.

TGR: You travel the world looking at investment opportunities and recently returned from Ethiopia. How do investors know what jurisdictions are safe?

LJ: There is no place that’s completely safe. There have been adverse actions in Canada—even in Québec. Nothing is sacred. However, at some level, price trumps risk. Yes, Africa, as a general rule, is higher risk than Canadian provinces are. That’s the nature of the beast. The market often factors that into prices, but sometimes it overdoes the discount and that can be an opportunity.

A number of the countries in West Africa have been relatively stable: Ghana, Burkina Faso and the Ivory Coast. The bad boy in the area is Mali, which unfortunately had military problems with rebels in recent memory, but those never affected the mining areas. The country just had a peaceful election. Negative headlines can be alarming, but it’s a grave mistake to sell off everything in Africa just because one country had a problem.

For example, Eritrea and Somalia have garnered negative headlines recently, but, though nearby, Ethiopia is different. It does not deserve to be painted with the same brush. I did more than just look at projects. I walked the streets. I did man-on-the-street interviews. I haven’t bought into any Ethiopia plays yet, but I came away quite impressed with the country, and am keeping my radar on, looking for targets.

TGR: What companies in other parts of Africa do you like?

LJ: Endeavour Mining Corp. (EDV:TSX; EVR:ASX) is operating in multiple jurisdictions in West Africa, which gives it some mitigation of political risk through diversity. The company bought out Mali-based Avion Gold Corp., a profitable and growing producer that was deeply discounted because the coup I mentioned scared the market. Endeavour Mining has cash, it has doubled its mill capacity in Mali and has completed more than 80% of the construction of its Agbaou gold mine in the Ivory Coast. The company is growing fast, and market just doesn’t seem to notice or care because it’s scared of Africa.

TGR: What else in Africa do you find interesting?

LJ: PMI Gold Corp. (PMV:TSX.V; PVM:ASX; PN3N:FSE) in Ghana is an interesting story. The company has a large resource with favorable economics. It raised about half the money it needed to build its mine, but then the market turned south and it hasn’t been able to raise the rest of the money. If it can arrange the rest of the money, the stock should get a rerating.

TGR: Like a lot of juniors right now, is it a matter of having money in the bank to move forward?

LJ: PMI Gold is different because it isn’t at risk of going insolvent and having to padlock the door. The company has more than $100 million ($100M) in the bank; it’s not going anywhere. It has a viable project and money to wait for the market to get better if it needs to.

TGR: You’ve spent a lot of time in Latin America. What catches your eye there?

LJ: French Guiana is an interesting, “off the radar” place. It has the same geology as West Africa and has been home to significant discoveries. French Guiana is not an independent country, but a department of France—the regulators are in Paris—which has shown a willingness to work with miners.

TGR: You’ve said before that you also like Colombia.

LJ: I like Colombia a lot because it was basically held off the market for decades due to the war there, making it a target-rich environment. That said, the country does have an active environmental movement, and you do need to take care to do things right.

TGR: Are there any countries that concern you?

LJ: Argentina has great mineral resources, but has become a very risky political jurisdiction, and Chile, once one of the most pro-mining countries in Latin America, has taken several turns for the worse recently. We wouldn’t touch anything in Bolivia or Ecuador, and don’t care much for most of Central America for mining.

We were quite concerned about Peru after the election of the current president, Ollanta Humala, because he used a lot of anti-mining rhetoric in his campaign. We completely exited all our Peru plays at the time. However, he’s since turned out to be more practical than he sounded. Some projects are still on ice there, but mining isn’t easy anywhere in the world and Peru does have a terrific mineral endowment.

We recently recommended Dynacor Gold Mines Inc. (DNG:TSX) in Peru because it’s a producer without the danger and technical challenges of actual mining. It is a licensed gold mill and buys ore from miners in the area. Peru is cracking down on illegal mining and milling by so-called artisan miners that are harming the environment. The government decided to get serious about milling in environmentally sound ways and is actually enforcing the law. Dynacor has the only legal mill in an area full of high-grade gold veins, and, presto, now it can pick and choose from the highest-grade supplies of gold ore. The real beauty of this set up is that if the price of gold drops, Dynacor pays less for the ore it buys—it’s more “correction proof” than any other producer I know.

Dynacor is a small, thinly traded stock, so buyers should take care. But as long as gold doesn’t go so low that the miners stop mining, this one makes money. It’s an example of opportunity where the bottom for gold doesn’t matter. Share price appreciation doesn’t depend on higher gold prices, just on the company executing its business plan.

TGR: What about farther north. What companies are promising in Mexico?

LJ: I like the high-grade silver producers in Mexico, like Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (FSM:NYSE; FVI:TSX; FVI:BVL; F4S:FSE), First Majestic Silver Corp. (FR:TSX; AG:NYSE; FMV:FSE) and Endeavour Silver Corp. (EDR:TSX; EXK:NYSE; EJD:FSE).

And then there is Almaden Minerals Ltd. (AMM:TSX; AAU:NYSE), which I like a lot. It has made a large, good-grade discovery. It’s well above average for an open-pit mine and has a lot of characteristics that lend itself to a profitable operation. That is the bird in the hand. There’s also the potential for more such zones to be discovered on the same property.

TGR: The next catalyst is a resource estimate?

LJ: There’s a resource update due this fall. Drills are still turning. At some point this fall, management will have to draw a line in the sand—because I don’t think they’ll run out of mineralization to drill—and come up with new numbers.

TGR: A country that doesn’t get a lot of attention as a gold producer is Turkey. Does it have the geology to fit your profile of what can make money?

LJ: I would encourage investors to reconsider any negative attitudes they may have about Turkey because the country has shown that it is truly open to responsible mining. It has permitted eight major gold mines that have gone into production this cycle alone, including several owned by Western companies. There have been some protests unrelated to mining and some violence along the border with Syria in the news. However, the companies mining in Turkey are mostly far from those sources of tension, and have not been affected. If the market sees the place as higher risk than it is, that’s an opportunity.

The Turkey play we like the most is Pilot Gold Inc. (PLG:TSX); the company’s high-grade discovery at its TV Tower gold project has helped put Turkey back on the radar for many investors. There’s no resource estimate yet, but there have already been several spectacular drill holes and many excellent ones. Most recently, it reported 45 meters (45m) of 15+ grams/ton (15+ g/t), and it’s wide open. The project is demonstrating strong, multimillion-ounce potential. The beauty is that the project is not just one hot spot, but a whole district with outstanding potential. I’ve been to this one. You drive from one end to the other and there are outcroppings and showings of hydrothermal activity all over the place.

But there is more. With Pilot, investors also get a great project in the prime jurisdiction of Nevada: Kinsley Mountain. The company has already reported several high-grade intercepts, as well as others one might call merely “encouraging.” They are looking for a big, low-cost discovery, as the same team delivered at the now-famous Long Canyon project they sold to Newmont Mining. That’s a bit of a speculation, but the question of how likely success is will be answered after this year’s drilling. The market is focused on the discovery in Turkey and isn’t giving Pilot anything for Nevada. That gives investors the Nevada upside, whatever it is, for free.

TGR: When might its resource estimate be out?

LJ: It’s premature to say that there will be a resource after this year’s drilling at Kinsley Mountain. If the drilling goes well, and is consistent enough, there should be enough holes to estimate a resource, but we won’t know that until it happens. Pilot’s target in Turkey is much more likely to produce a resource estimate after this field season’s drilling. It could be the first quarter of next year.

TGR: Closer to home, what are some companies in Canada that you’re excited about right now?

LJ: The No. 1 pick has to be Pretium Resources. Bob Quartermain’s large, high-grade discovery, the Valley of the Kings zone at the Brucejack project, is one for the record books. There are people who are skeptical of the current resource model. Some of these are not just people who are professional critics, but good people with years of experience in the field. They know how tricky Mother Nature can be, and that’s fine. However, if you’re going to speculate on a mineral discovery, you want to speculate on something that’s really big or really high grade. This project is both. It could be a mega-bonanza-grade deposit—and not in some kleptocratic banana republic. It’s certainly worth a swing for the bleachers on this one. The project is undergoing a bulk-sampling test now. The results, expected in the fall, should tell us if it’s real.

TGR: Is there a cutoff for grade or size that you are looking for?

LJ: No, it’s really about consistency. Do the results from underground match the model that was generated from the surface? The model that was generated from the surface is extremely robust. This could be a highly profitable mine. Even at low gold prices it still makes money.

By the way, while this is going on, Pretium is still making discoveries. It just announced results from the Cleopatra Vein where it reported 2.5 kilos—not grams, not ounces, but kilos—of gold over a thickness of more than 5m. That’s a honking fat vein for such high grades. In Mexico they say, un vetaso. A vena is a vein so un vetaso is a great big vein.

TGR: We love those technical terms in all languages.

LJ: I’m also very fond of Balmoral Resources Ltd. (BAR:TSX.V; BAMLF:OTCQX). The company has a high-grade story coming together. It has made a high-grade discovery that keeps returning high grades over significant thicknesses. One of the zones is 500+m in shallow drilling along strike. That’s great because these kinds of deposits tend to be deeper than they are wide. If the long dimension is down, this thing will be big. There’s no initial resource. There’s no preliminary economic assessment. There’s no feasibility study. But the company has a discovery in hand and plenty of money. It’s drilling it now.

I also like Premier Gold Mines Ltd. (PG:TSX). The company has multiple high-grade projects all adjacent to mines in production. It has tons of money, which it can deploy in various ways. Whether the company gets taken over or if it needs to advance its projects itself, it’s not going to need to go to the market anytime soon.

TGR: Is there a catalyst on the horizon or is Premier just waiting for the gold price to go back up?

LJ: There will be drill results as catalysts. The real game changer is a sleeper project that it has had for years: the Red Lake joint venture with Goldcorp Inc. (G:TSX; GG:NYSE). Goldcorp dug a tunnel through the property to connect their two mines in the area. Premier has a geological theory that there’s a lot of high-grade ore to be discovered near where that tunnel passed by. That is being drill tested now. Will it work? Will they find as much or will it be as consistent and high grade as it hopes? We don’t know, but the cost is pretty minimal and Premier has more than $100M in cash. Investors get the upside almost for free.

TGR: What companies might offer a bit more immediate upside?

LJ: There’s a little stock with light volume, Banks Island Gold Ltd. (BOZ:TSX.V), that I view as a “little engine that could” story. This little engine hasn’t made it to the top of the mountain yet, but it has momentum. It has a small, but very high-grade deposit on Banks Island, British Columbia, called Yellow Giant. It’s not a giant yet (the company is working on making it bigger), but it’s near the surface, so it should have a very high return. The study Banks Island Gold did on Yellow Giant had a one-month payback and only needed $6M to put it into production. It recently signed an offtake deal that provides all the capital and then some. We’ll see if the little engine makes it or not, very soon. If it does, Yellow Giant will throw off a significant amount of cash, even at low gold prices.

That leads us to the second part of the story. Banks Island Gold has a much larger project called Red Mountain with a lot of upside. If the little one works out, it gives shareholders a chance to see the big one advance with minimal shareholder dilution.

TGR: Any others in Canada?

LJ: I also like ATAC Resources Ltd. (ATC:TSX.V), because it has sold off without any bad news from the company. I can say the same thing about Kaminak Gold Corp. (KAM:TSX.V). Both are up in the Yukon, which the market seems to have suddenly realized is remote. Of course, the Yukon is remote, but it’s no more remote this year than it was last year. It’s as if Mr. Market believes somebody has moved the Yukon farther up to the North Pole.

ATAC has been drilling into exceptionally high-grade stuff in multiple discoveries along it’s very large Rackla property. It will take more drilling to prove all that up into NI-43-101-compliant resources with attractive economics, but the ingredients are there.

Kaminak is like that, too. Its base-case resource has 3.2 million ounces (3.2 Moz) at over 1.5 g/t on average. That’s a good average for an open-pit resource. What people forget is that within that it has almost 2 Moz at almost 3 g/t.

TGR: What advice can you give to investors who have been on this wild ride for the last year, looking for ways to protect or even grow their wealth in the current market?

LJ: Don’t blink. Don’t lose your courage. Do not sell just for portfolio balancing reasons or any other Procrustean approach. Gold is off, but don’t panic. Don’t realize losses you don’t need to. Be disciplined.

This is an opportunity to average down. That can be a scary thing to do, but if your investment premises remain true—gold is going higher, the company’s story is still compelling, etc.—averaging down is a necessary part of success. Let’s say an investor buys something at $1/share, it drops to $0.50/share and goes back to $1/share—the investor is merely back at the starting point and hasn’t made anything. Suppose the investor averages down, buying an equal amount of the stock at $0.50/share. When it goes back to $1/share, the investor’s average cost is $0.75/share. That’s the way to come out ahead.

If it’s a great stock, a great story, a great company run by great people and you believe the fundamental premise of rising metals prices going forward, don’t be afraid.

TGR: Thank you so much for your time.

LJ: Sure, my pleasure.

Louis James is the master of metals at Casey Research, where he’s the widely read and well-respected senior editor of the International Speculator, Casey Investment Alert and Conversations with Casey.Fluent in English, Spanish and French, James regularly takes his skills on the road, evaluating highly prospective geological targets and visiting explorers and producers at the far corners of the globe and getting to know their management teams.

Louis James will be speaking at the Casey Research Fall Summit Oct. 4–6 in Tucson, Arizona, along with former presidential candidate and congressman Dr. Ron Paul, economist Dr. Lacy Hunt and The Crash Course author Chris Martenson. More information on the conference and conference audio is available here.

Want to read more Gold Report interviews like this? Sign up for our free e-newsletter, and you’ll learn when new articles have been published. To see a list of recent interviews with industry analysts and commentators, visit our Streetwise Interviews page.

DISCLOSURE:

1) JT Long conducted this interview for The Gold Report and provides services to The Gold Report as an employee. She or her family own shares of the following companies mentioned in this interview: None.

2) The following companies mentioned in the interview are sponsors of The Gold Report: Pretium Resources Inc., Fortuna Silver Mines Inc., Almaden Minerals Ltd., Pilot Gold Inc., Balmoral Resources Ltd., Premier Gold Mines Ltd. and Goldcorp Inc. Streetwise Reports does not accept stock in exchange for its services or as sponsorship payment.

3) Louis James: I or my family own shares of the following companies mentioned in this interview: ATAC Resources Ltd., Balmoral Resources Ltd., Almaden Minerals Ltd., Banks Island Gold Ltd. and Endeavour Mining Corp. I personally am or my family is paid by the following companies mentioned in this interview: None. The following companies have sponsored tables at the Casey Research Conference and/or purchased banner ads on the Casey Research site this year: Pretium Resources Inc., Endeavour Mining Corp., PMI Gold Corp., Dynacor Gold Mines Inc., Almaden Minerals Ltd., Balmoral Resources Ltd., Premier Gold Mines Ltd., Banks Island Gold Ltd., Kaminak Gold Corp., First Majestic Silver Corp. and Pilot Gold Inc. I was not paid by Streetwise Reports for participating in this interview. Comments and opinions expressed are my own comments and opinions. I had the opportunity to review the interview for accuracy as of the date of the interview and am responsible for the content of the interview.

4) Interviews are edited for clarity. Streetwise Reports does not make editorial comments or change experts’ statements without their consent.

5) The interview does not constitute investment advice. Each reader is encouraged to consult with his or her individual financial professional and any action a reader takes as a result of information presented here is his or her own responsibility. By opening this page, each reader accepts and agrees to Streetwise Reports’ terms of use and full legal disclaimer.

6) From time to time, Streetwise Reports LLC and its directors, officers, employees or members of their families, as well as persons interviewed for articles and interviews on the site, may have a long or short position in securities mentioned and may make purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market or otherwise.

Streetwise – The Gold Report is Copyright © 2013 by Streetwise Reports LLC. All rights are reserved. Streetwise Reports LLC hereby grants an unrestricted license to use or disseminate this copyrighted material (i) only in whole (and always including this disclaimer), but (ii) never in part.

Streetwise Reports LLC does not guarantee the accuracy or thoroughness of the information reported.

Streetwise Reports LLC receives a fee from companies that are listed on the home page in the In This Issue section. Their sponsor pages may be considered advertising for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1734.

Participating companies provide the logos used in The Gold Report. These logos are trademarks and are the property of the individual companies.

101 Second St., Suite 110

Petaluma, CA 94952

Tel.: (707) 981-8999

Fax: (707) 981-8998

Email: [email protected]