174 ETFs You Should NEVER Buy

By WallStreetDaily.com

My apologies, but I misspoke earlier in the week.

The most dangerous, wealth-destroying investment in the world right now isn’t cash. It’s leveraged exchange-traded funds (ETFs).

By my count, there are at least 174 of these in existence. And on the surface, these ETFs promise to double or triple the movements of the underlying markets they track.

I’m here to tell you that they’ll do anything but.

You see, double- and triple-leveraged ETFs (whether long or short) pack a nasty surprise. It’s almost unbelievable, actually.

And particularly in this volatile market, theses ETFs are hardwired for losses.

Here’s what I mean…

The Nuts and Bolts of Leveraged ETFs

Leveraged ETFs have been around about as long as Hannah Montana (only since 2006).

Given such newness, let’s first make sure we’re all on the same page regarding the general mechanics of how they work…

A normal exchange-traded fund is constructed to mirror the movement of an underlying index. If the index rises 5%, the ETF that’s tracking it is supposed to rise 5% (before expenses). And an inverse ETF simply moves in the opposite direction of the index that it’s tracking. So if the index drops 5%, the inverse ETF should rise 5%.

When you apply leverage, however, these movements are magnified. So if the inverse ETF uses three-times leverage – and the index falls 5% – the ETF should rise 15%.

Sounds simple enough in theory, right?

Too bad the reality doesn’t measure up. Or, as Yogi Berra used to say, “In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is.”

Leverage? What Leverage?

Consider this: From January to May 15, 2009, the Russell 1000 Financial Services Index fell by 5.9%.

So a long ETF using three-times leverage should have dropped by 17.7% (-5.9 x 3 = -17.7%). Instead, it plummeted by 65.6%.

And an inverse ETF using three-times leverage should have been up 17.7%. But it sank by 83.4%.

Talk about not getting what you paid for.

Pick any other period, and I promise it will yield similarly confounding results. And the worst offenders will always be the ETFs using three-times leverage.

The question is, why?

Two Fatal Flaws of Leveraged ETFs

Just so we’re clear, I don’t detest all exchange-traded funds.

Regular ETFs provide a low-cost way to achieve instant diversification and access markets that aren’t readily available. And unlike traditional mutual funds, they provide intraday liquidity.

But when it comes to leveraged ETFs, those benefits are completely nullified by two fatal flaws…

~Fatal Flaw #1: Daily Rebalancing

Leveraged ETFs don’t actually buy individual stocks. Instead, they invest in derivatives. And these derivatives require daily rebalancing in order to match the rise or fall in the index. Otherwise, the leverage ratio for the ETF will be off-kilter. That means leveraged ETFs can only be counted on to perform (as promised) for a single day.

In other words, they’re for day traders only – not investors.

But this distinction isn’t being communicated clearly to investors. As a result, the SEC actually felt the need to issue its own warning about the confusion surrounding leveraged ETFs.

~Fatal Flaw #2: The “Dark Magic” of Compounding

For years, we’ve been wooed by the magic of compounding returns. If you’re 18 years old and invest $2,000 per year for three years (and not a penny more after that), they say you’ll end up a millionaire if you simply leave it invested and let compounding work its magic.

But when it comes to leveraged ETFs, compounding often works against us.

For example, consider what would happen if a regular ETF drops by 10% one day, then rises by 10% the next. (And for simplicity’s sake, let’s assume the starting value of the index it tracks is 100.)

  • Day 1: The ETF would be down 10% to $90.
  • Day 2: It would rise by 10% to reach an ending value of $99.

Total Return: -1%

Now let’s take a look at what happens with an ETF that seeks double the return of the index (i.e. – uses two-times leverage). Again, we’ll assume a starting value of $100…

  • Day 1: The ETF would be down 20% to $80.
  • Day 2: It would rise by 20% to reach an ending value of $96.

Total Return: -4% (when it should actually be down only 2%)

If we ratchet up the leverage to three-times and extend the holding period, it magnifies the negative impact of compounding. Toss in some market volatility, which we’re experiencing now, and this tracking error gets even worse.

Bottom line: Beneath a simple exterior – and the allure of a novel hedging strategy – there are considerable complexities and risks associated with leveraged ETFs.

Unless you’re a day trader, with an uncanny ability to predict every jot and tittle of the market, avoid leveraged ETFs like the plague. Heck, even if you could pull off such a feat, the transaction costs would eat your portfolio alive.

So the best bet is to simply avoid leveraged ETFs altogether.

Ahead of the tape,

Louis Basenese

The post 174 ETFs You Should NEVER Buy appeared first on  | Wall Street Daily.

Article By WallStreetDaily.com

Original Article: 174 ETFs You Should NEVER Buy

Asian market varies after US data

By HY Markets Forex Blog

The Asian market were trading mixed on Wednesday, with the Shanghai Composite index opening at a negative territory, while the Australian and Hong Kong shares climbed overnight after the better-than-expected US data was released .

The Japanese Nikkei 225 closed at 1.04% to 12,834.01, while the Topix index closed down at a low 0.9% to 1,069.28.

Shanghai Composite slid 1.02% to 1.02% to 1,931.16 at 6:03am GMT, while in Hong Kong, the climbed 1.12% to 20,079.27 at the same time.

The Australian S&P/ASX 200 gained 1.48% higher, closing at 4,724.70, while in South Korea; the Kospi index increased 0.16% at 1,783.45.

The People’s Bank of China (PBOC) said it would maintain the liquidity in the financial markets in order to stabilize the system where required, in a statement released on Tuesday.

“We’ll closely monitor the change of liquidity within the banking system going forward, flexibly adjust liquidity management based on international payments and the liquidity demand-and-supply situation,” deputy head of the PBoC’s Shanghai branch Ling Tao said in a statement.

The rate of the seven-day average repurchase rate closed at 7.44% higher on Tuesday. High borrowing costs in China’s interbank markets is expected to decline by mid-July this year, according to analysts.

Goldman Sachs changed its estimate for the Chinese economic growth for this year from 7.8% to 7.4%.

Meanwhile in the U.S, the consumer confidence index climbed to 8.14 in June from its previous record of 76.2 in May, according to the Conference Board statement released on Tuesday.

Durable goods booking in the US rose 3.6% in May to $231 billion, while the house markets made a 1.3% gain to 460,000 sold homes

The post Asian market varies after US data appeared first on | HY Markets Official blog.

Article provided by HY Markets Forex Blog

European market climbs with China still in focus

By HY Markets Forex Blog

The European market opened green on Wednesday, while investors are still concerned and focused on China over the credit crunch.

European Euro Stoxx 50 rose 0.46% at 2,555.47 as of 7:29am GMT, while in Germany; the DAX index gained 0.44% to 7,846.15 at the same time. The French CAC 40 gained 0.13% to 3,645.68 and the British FTSE 100 added 0.14% to 6,110.50.

Jonathan Sudria, trader at Capital Spreads Jonathan said “The vicious moves lower on fears of Fed tapering and a Chinese credit crunch seem to have abated for now and tentative buyers are feeling a little confidence about dipping their toes back into the market.”

The US Consumer Confidence Index advanced to 81.4 in June, from previous month of 76.2, while durable goods booking in the US rose 3.6% in May to $231 billion, according to reports released from the department of commerce.

Earlier, the central bank said it would put in cash into the economy to support growth, however changing its tune; the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) stated in a statement released on Tuesday, that it would the support liquidity in the financial markets in order to keep the system stable where necessary.

The French final gross domestic product (GDP) fell by 0.2% in the first quarter, while the year-on-year dropped 0.4%, according to the National Institute for Statistics and Economic studies.

Germany’s consumer climate increased by 6.8 points in July from previous record of 6.5 in June, GFK reported. While in Italy, the roman government will auction Treasury bills with maturity in 186 days, the country’s target is eight billion euros.

The post European market climbs with China still in focus appeared first on | HY Markets Official blog.

Article provided by HY Markets Forex Blog

Is This the Ultimate Contrarian Opportunity…Or a Death Wish?

By MoneyMorning.com.au

Q: How can you spot a vegan at a dinner party?

A: Don’t worry, they’ll tell you…

Markets like this require a dose of humour to get through! Because stocks, bonds, currencies, commodities…the current rout is taking no prisoners.

As central bankers make moves to remove the stabilisers from the market, the mood is turning sour as quickly as asset prices are falling.

The consensus mood is almost universally bearish. The question is: will consensus be proven wrong?

With many asset prices at multi-year lows, will this be looked back on as a massive contrarian buying opportunity…or is buying this market today an investing death wish?

The well-worn contrarian quote from that 18th century financier Baron Rothschild goes, ‘The time to buy is when there’s blood in the streets.

In his case it was quite literal: he bulked up the substantial Rothschild family fortune by betting big after the carnage and confusion of the Battle of Waterloo.

However, the full quote was in fact, ‘Buy when there’s blood in the streets, even if the blood is your own.

Well, there are plenty of investors out there that could relate to that today.

Is it Time to Get Bullish Again?

It’s tough to imagine. Junior resource companies have been falling for two and a half years now, and have lost over 70% on average.

Small Resources Index – a World of Pain


Source: Bell Potter

The worry now is that in the last month the small resources index has crashed through the level set in the GFC. This means it’s now at nine year lows.

Right now it’s hard to think we have seen the worst of it. Until recently, I’ve been pretty bullish. The thing is even just talk of the Federal Reserve dialling back on the current $85 billion buying program caused the market to crash – even while the Fed is merrily still buying $85 billion each month.

If global markets are falling simply in anticipation of tapering, what will happen when tapering actually happens?

In yesterday’s Money Morning I explained how the Bank of International Settlements (BIS) is pressuring all central banks to step off the gas and tighten up monetary policy.

They may be getting their way. It’s not just the Federal Reserve talking about it, but China seems to be actually tightening already. This could have a major effect on commodities and resources in particular. Marc Faber reckons commodities look ‘horrible‘.

A mining exec I was in touch with recently said, ‘It will be interesting to see how the next 12 months plays out. I think there will be a lot of blood on the floor.

This strain is showing up in more than just stock prices. Brokers are leaving the industry each month in large numbers. The Australian financial services sector has now shrunk by around 10% from its recent peak.

Everyone is having a tough time. As a measure of retail investor activity, the web-traffic for the stock forums has more than halved in the last six months.

You can understand why. Even last year’s hot trotters are turning into this year’s dog food. Sirius (SIR), the rags-to-riches nickel explorer with the dream project, has fallen 70% in a few months from $5.00 to as low as $1.56 yesterday. Another recent market darling, Linc Energy (LNC), has crashed from $3.00 to $0.78 as of yesterday. There are many more with similar charts.

Sirius and Linc – Sharp Falls in Last Three Months

Source: Bigcharts

In recent days I’ve taken profit on some of the winners in the Diggers and Drillers tips, and cut some losers in anticipation of prices falling further. In all, I’ve halved the number of stocks in the portfolio.

But just as this all unfolds, some people in the market are getting very bullish, with talk of this being an outstanding opportunity. We’ve heard that the whole way down of course, but ultimately they may be right. Patience will be the key, as things may well get worse before they get better.

Just as some high profile resource funds are being forced to sell to meet investors’ redemptions, there are other funds out there that are starting to see value and buy ‘quality’ on the cheap. They admit that they will have to be patient.

Others, like mining legend Owen Hegarty, made the case for the current squeeze in mining to make the next bull market ‘stronger for longer‘.

History to Repeat?

Your regular editor, Kris Sayce, is certainly getting more excited by the day. The market reminds him of the collapse in 2008. Back then, when everyone was running for the hills, he tipped a raft of beaten up stocks which went on to put in big triple-digit returns, including gains of 242%, 338% and 458%.

The trigger that Kris saw back in 2008 (along with the torrent of central bank money printing) is happening today – the collapse of the yen.

The yen slumped from late 2012 through to the early part of this year, before rallying in recent weeks. But that rally looks to be over. If Kris is right, he believes that could be the catalyst for another Aussie stock rally.

It’s a risky strategy, but I don’t think I’ve ever seen him so confident.

Dr Alex Cowie
Editor, Diggers & Drillers

Join me on Google+

From the Port Phillip Publishing Library

Special Report: The Sixth Revolution Has Just Begun

Daily Reckoning: Think and Invest Like a Venture Capitalist

Money Morning: How Central Bank Zombies Control the Stock Market

Pursuit of Happiness: Don’t Blame Progress, Blame the Governments

Diggers and Drillers:
Why You Should Invest in Junior Mining Stocks Now

China’s Growth Story Ends With a Whimper

By MoneyMorning.com.au

The Chinese model of economic growth is flawed. It has wasted resources on an unprecedented scale. Empty cities, excess industrial capacity and sour construction loans litter the country. New lending yields less and less incremental growth. And the very worst construction projects aren’t producing enough cash to service debts.

The Chinese economy, like most others, rests on a shaky foundation of credit. The country has completed the largest building boom in history – a boom dependant on unsustainable growth in the supply of money and credit.

It’s important to understand that there are effectively two governmental factions in China: one that’s interested in power, control and stability and one that’s interested in getting rich no matter the consequences.

With China’s late 2008 surge in bank lending, the second faction’s priorities – construction and industrial activity of all kinds – won out. But ever since inflation heated up, threatening social stability, the first faction grew more concerned about its hold on power.

Because of concerns about social stability, China’s central bank, the People’s Bank of China (PBOC), started tightening liquidity to the official banking system. Such tightening had the potential to spark a panic in real estate and banking a few years ago.

No panic ensued…

No Panic in China…Yet

Instead, overstretched borrowers and local governments migrated to off-balance sheet structures within the ‘shadow’ banking system. The loans that funded busted projects were, in many cases, not rolled over during China’s credit tightening phase of 2010-11.

Shunned from the banking system, stressed borrowers were desperate to find new sources of funding. They found high-interest, short-term funding from ‘trust’ companies. As part of the shadow banking system, trust companies match savers looking to earn high interest rates with desperate borrowers.

At the end of 2012, borrowers scrambled to secure loans from trust companies. According to the PBOC, trust loans rose 679% in the year ending December 2012, to 264 billion yuan ($42 billion). High-interest rate trust loans now make up 16% of China’s entire pool of financing. Trust loans, like payday loans in the U.S., have short maturities. Short-term trust loans amount to an estimated 50% of Chinese GDP, so liquidity crises can quickly spiral into solvency crises.

Local governments are big trust loan borrowers. They’ve reverted to bad, old infrastructure spending habits. The late 2012 revival in infrastructure spending may have been cut off when liquidity to fund trust companies dried up. Some trusts could be on the verge of defaulting…

Trusts rely on funding from the official banking sector, and in recent weeks, the PBOC has directed the banks to ration credit to shadow banks. ‘The [PBOC] has made it clear that it intends to penalize those aggressive lenders and crack down on the potential for moral hazard,’ writes Credit Suisse analyst Dong Tao in a June 20 note. ‘Some small-medium-sized banks have deployed an excessive amount of liquidity into high-yield/high-risk assets [like trust loans]… counting on the central bank’s rescue in case that liquidity gets tightened.’

The central bank told banks to look elsewhere for liquidity. ‘To us, this is a sign of brinkmanship,’ Tao concludes.

When the Chinese banks looked for liquidity outside the cozy confines of the PBOC, they found it scarce and expensive. The banks demanded higher interest rates to lend to each other.

When one bank fears another bank might have exposure to dodgy trust companies, it now demands a high interest rate to compensate for risk. The Shanghai Interbank Offered Rate (SHIBOR) – the rate banks charge each other for loans – spiked dramatically.

SHIBOR rates have fallen a bit since the PBOC injected some liquidity into the system. But the PBOC issued a terse memo on liquidity management practices to the banks on June 24. Credit Suisse’s Tao explains:

‘We take this as a gesture from the central bank that ‘teaching a lesson’ is probably over, but it could tighten the liquidity again should it feel banks are misbehaving.’

The PBOC, in other words, will ensure liquidity is sufficient to allow for an orderly deleveraging of unviable shadow banking entities. But the deleveraging (credit contraction) process will not be stopped.

A state-sponsored contraction of China’s shadow banking system is bad news for property developers. The second Chinese government faction – the faction of speculators and crony politicians making money from the bubble – has no interest in ending the status quo: It financed projects through entities called local government financing vehicles (LGFVs). These are joint ventures between local governments and property developers.

Local governments own the land. There are no real property taxes in China, so local governments earn tax revenue by selling land into these joint ventures. Then, they get a piece of the proceeds from development.

Loans to these LGFVs are in a sort of netherworld. The Chinese banks think they are going to be ‘money good’ because they are quasi-government entities. But a study of LGFVs conducted by banking regulators a few years ago discovered that a staggeringly high number of these LGFVs couldn’t generate enough cash to service their debts. Some estimate that up to half of these loans could go bad.

Everyone expects that the government will bail out LGFVs when they default, after losing funding from the trust loan market. But the central government may not ride to the rescue. Political leaders concerned with stability and inflation seem determined to purge excesses. The will to reform and restructure will be tested, because the bubble’s excesses were staggering…

Short selling legend Jim Chanos is a vocal bear on China. He famously described the country as stuck on a ‘treadmill to hell.’

In other words, Chinese leaders feel the need to sustain frantic levels of construction and infrastructure activity for fear that the economy would crash without it; yet more and more construction results in lower and lower incremental returns on investment.

Chanos illustrated the scale of China’s new office and residential apartment construction; it’s so enormous that it’s hard to grasp: 31-32 billion square feet of new office space was constructed in just 18 months after China’s 2008 bank-funded wave of stimulus. To put the number into perspective, it’s equivalent to a 5-by-5 office cubicle for every man, woman and child in China.

The Biggest Myth of Them All

Chanos thinks the biggest myth of all about the China investment story is the myth of limitless urban migration. This myth involves 15-20 million people per year moving from rural areas to urban areas. But the migrants into cities are among the lowest-wage workers, and, ironically, many have migrated simply to construct the very condos that they can’t afford.

Another myth Chanos busted is the idea that most Chinese real estate investors are all-cash buyers – or at the very least invest with hefty down payments. But much of this ‘all-cash’ buying is funded by loans sourced elsewhere, such as loans drawn from corporate credit lines.

Whatever the source of down payments for real estate, the bottom line is that Chinese banking system assets grew at 25% per year and the shadow banking system grew at 10% per year. Thirty-five percent credit growth never ends well, but it’s fun while it lasts.

Everything in China is about making the GDP number. Politicians are fixated on the result, rather than how they get there. But GDP – adjusted for wasteful, uneconomic projects – will ultimately be much lower. We’ll see how much lower when the government recapitalises the Chinese banking system – both official and shadow banks.

By the end of the banking system restructuring, China’s reputation will have taken a big hit…

The biggest construction project in history will have ended; the supply of newly printed yuan, printed to fund the banking system restructuring, will have ballooned; the savings of a hardworking population will have been wasted on boondoggles; and China’s growth story, as its population follows Japan into an aging demographic cycle, will end with a whimper.

Dan Amoss
Contributing Editor, Money Morning

Publisher’s Note: This article first appeared in The Daily Reckoning USA.

Join Money Morning on Google+

From the Archives…

The 12 Most Important Rules Every Investor Must Know
21-06-2013 – Vern Gowdie

The US Economy Butterfly Effect
20-06-2013 – Murray Dawes

Beware The Federal Reserve’s Deadly Game of Poker
19-06-2013 – Dr Alex Cowie

Why Thursday Could Be a Key Day for Silver…
18-06-2013 – Dr Alex Cowie

The Single Biggest Mistake a Technology Investor Can Make
17-06-2013 – Sam Volkering

After Labor Strikes, What’s Next for Platinum?

Source: Brian Sylvester of The Metals Report (6/25/13)

http://www.theaureport.com/pub/na/15399

Violent South African mining labor strikes shocked the globe in 2012, but the resulting negotiations underway could create more stable supply flows in the long term—that’s how CPM Commodity Analyst Erica Rannestad sees it. In this interview with The Metals Report, Rannestad discusses the key developments that could signal a price rise and which producers could clean up big on high-priced PGMs.

The Metals Report: Erica, the platinum group metals (PGM) sector created a lot of buzz at the beginning of this year. What can investors expect in the coming 12 months?

Erica Rannestad: There’s going to be a lot of development in labor and wage negotiation structures in South Africa. It could potentially improve labor conditions in the platinum mining sector, which would provide more certainty about supply flows.

The PGM markets are highly concentrated, meaning that both supply and demand are heavily reliant on only a few sources. On the supply side, about 75% of platinum mine supply comes from South Africa.

These metals are primarily industrial commodities and their prices move in tandem with industrial activity, mostly in the auto sector. At present, there is weakness in platinum prices because demand from the European auto sector is weak and contracting. During the next 12–18 months, growth could improve in the European auto market, which would be positive for platinum prices.

TMR: Could the downturn in automobile purchases in Europe be offset by growing automobile purchases in China and the rest of Asia?

ER: Not necessarily, because platinum is mostly used in diesel automobiles and the auto markets in China and most Asian countries are predominantly gasoline powered. While commercial vehicles are sold throughout the world, most are powered by diesel and the market only accounts for a minority of total global vehicle sales. Even though there is improved growth in the Chinese auto market, it’s not filtering into platinum prices so much as palladium prices because the Chinese auto market is much more reliant on palladium.

TMR: In 2012, some intense labor conflicts in South Africa lead to the Association of Mineworkers and Construction Union (AMCU) to become the majority union at Lonmin Plc (LMI:LSE), Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd. (IMP:JSE) and Anglo American Platinum Ltd.’s (AMS:JSE) Rustenburg complex. What does this mean for the industry at large?

ER: Lonmin and the AMCU are struggling to form an agreement about revisions to the wage negotiation process. There’s still a lot of uncertainty right now, and high risk of additional strikes over the upcoming months. But there’s potential for a reduction in uncertainty about labor-related disruptions to supply in the long term.

TMR: Will the Lonmin deal set the precedent for other companies?

ER: Not necessarily. Last year, Lonmin agreed to a maximum 22% increase in wages. The market thought it was going to set a precedent, but that didn’t necessarily happen. The Chamber of Mines, the Department of Mineral Resources and platinum mining companies are working together in a collaborative way to try and resolve labor issues.

TMR: How much platinum and palladium has Lonmin been responsible for annually?

ER: It has the capacity to produce about 1.5 million ounces (1.5 Moz) of platinum, palladium and rhodium, which is about 9% of global mining capacity of PGMs.

TMR: That could be a significant shortfall if negotiations don’t go well. When is the earliest we could expect an agreement?

ER: It’s been turned over to arbitration. The Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration has scheduled the arbitration for June 26. Therefore, I think there could be a decision in the next month or so.

TMR: The other difficulty often associated with South Africa is the threat of nationalization. Those whispers were more ubiquitous a year ago. What are you hearing now?

ER: Our view is that nationalization of the mining industry in South Africa will not occur. That conversation is always coming into the market and it’s always being shut down.

TMR: Let’s get to some hard numbers.

ER: Overall, we do expect an improvement in both supply and demand for all the PGMs. For platinum, last year there was a nearly 11% reduction in supply. This year, we expect about a 4% increase to 7.3 Moz. Last year, fabrication demand was flat from 2011 levels. Most of that was driven by a sharp reduction in European auto demand, which was offset by an increase in jewelry demand. This year, we expect about a 0.9% increase in fabrication demand to 7.4 Moz. That will mostly be driven by a much smaller reduction in European auto demand coupled with continued growth in jewelry demand.

Palladium supply contracted by 5.5% last year to 8.6 Moz, which was slower than the reduction in platinum because the palladium market is less dependent on South African supply. This year, we expect about a 6% palladium production increase to 9.1 Moz. Much of that is the return of supply from South Africa, but also growth in Zimbabwe.

Palladium demand last year grew 8.5% to 5.5 Moz. This year, we expect about a 6.4% increase to 5.8 Moz. The reduction in fabrication demand growth isn’t necessarily a negative thing. Less demand one year could manifest as pent-up demand in the following year. That was the case with Japan last year, following the 2011 natural disasters in the country that disrupted economic and industrial activity. That pent-up demand is largely behind the market now and we expect more normalized growth.

Total supply of rhodium declined 8% last year and we expect it to rise 5% this year to 933,000 ounces (933 Koz). Fabrication demand rose last year by 4.4% to 931 Koz. A lot of that growth was a return in demand from Japan last year. This year, we expect a 1.5% increase in fabrication demand to 945 Koz.

TMR: Where is investment demand trending for platinum and palladium?

ER: Last year, there were a lot of investors selling in the market. The reasons varied. Some investors who had invested years ago saw that the price had doubled and were offloading inventories. Investors in PGMs do best when they have a long-term horizon because these markets are very cyclical and highly concentrated, with very strong and price-positive long-term supply/demand fundamentals. Other investors sold because of cyclical weakness in these markets—contracting demand in Europe and slowing growth in China.

This year, we’re seeing some renewed, although hesitant, interest in PGMs. The new South African physical platinum exchange-traded fund (ETF) that was launched, NewPlat ETF by Absa Investments, has garnered a lot of interest from the South African community. Prior to the launch, institutional investors were only able to invest in the platinum market through mining equities, and equities have not performed very well for several years.

TMR: Right now, prices are at $1,475 for platinum, $750 for palladium and $1,175 for rhodium. What are your projected averages for those three through the end of the year?

ER: We expect platinum will average $1,555 for the year, which is almost flat from 2012. However, we expect a pickup in the Q4/13. We’re much more positive on palladium. We expect about a 13% increase in the annual average price to $730. The average rhodium price could experience a 12% decline to $1,120/oz.

TMR: You’re forecasting modest growth in demand in 2013. Why?

ER: The price weakness during the past two years has been cyclical. It’s also been a function of reduced overall investor interest in precious metals since they touched their peaks in 2011. We do believe that the prices will pick up. Investors need to watch for changes in demand prospects. If the European auto market does significantly improve, it’s going to be positive for platinum demand and prices. The long-term factors that drive the PGM markets are still very positive for the price. Investors that are still in the market with long-term objectives likely have not changed their views about the PGM markets, because many of those price-positive factors remain intact.

TMR: Can you explain the dynamics of PGM’s fabrication demand?

ER: We get this question a lot because these metals are reliant on very cyclical industries. Is there potential for PGMs to be substituted out of an auto catalyst? The answer right now is no. You can use platinum and palladium interchangeably in auto catalysts in gasoline vehicles—less so in diesel vehicles—but these metals are the most efficient, reliable and cheapest answer to reducing harmful emissions. There’s no other metal or technology that is able to perform those functions at those costs. It doesn’t look like PGMs are going to be thrifted out of the auto industry any time soon. Other applications that use PGMs, like the glass and petrochemical industries, don’t have much substitution potential either.

TMR: About a decade ago, Ford Motor Co. and others began stockpiling PGMs to guard against price increases. Could larger manufacturers using PGMs begin to stockpile again?

ER: The industry is much more sophisticated now and understands these markets better than they used to. The market is a little bit more transparent and we have a better idea of where the metal is. There’s also larger secondary supply than there was a decade ago, which has helped to diversity supply sources for fabricators. Of course stockpiling could happen again, but I doubt it would to that magnitude.

TMR: Are there any PGM mines slated to begin production this year?

ER: There are three mines or mine expansions that should start producing metal this year. The Booysendal project, which is owned by Northam Platinum Ltd. (NHM:JSE), is expected to begin producing metal in H2/13. The project could produce about 160 Koz PGMs annually. Northam already has one mine in South Africa, the Zondereinde Mine, which is the deepest, level mine in the country.

The Serra Pelada mine in Brazil, which is owned by Colossus Minerals Inc. (CSI:TSX; COLUF:OTCQX), will produce some PGMs from its asset. It’s primarily a gold mine.

TMR: Platinum and palladium are produced as byproducts at a lot of mines, including First Quantum Minerals Ltd.’s (FM:TSX; FQM:LSE) Kevitsa project in Finland.

ER: Then there is Zimplats in Zimbabwe, which is expanding its Ngezi mine with an additional 174 Koz.

TMR: Are there any other PGM projects on the drawing board?

ER: Xstrata Plc (XTA:LSE) has a project in Tanzania, called Kabanga, with a resource of about 1 Moz of PGMs slated for 2015.

Royal Nickel Corp.’s (RNX:TSX) Dumont nickel project in Canada could create 19 Koz of PGMs per year as a byproduct of nickel production. There are 1.5 Moz platinum and palladium Measured and Indicated resources. Only 19 Koz PGMs would be produced per annum, based on the latest reports.

In the U.S., the NorthMet project in Minnesota is being developed by Polymet Mining Corp. (POM:TSX; PLM:NYSE.MKT).

The largest project slated to come on-stream in the near term is the Platinum Group Metals Ltd. (PTM:TSX; PLG:NYSE.MKT) WBJV 1 project in South Africa. It’s a primary platinum project with 275 Koz of annual output.

TMR: That’s a low-cost producer as well.

ER: It’s a near-surface mine, not nearly as deep as most operations in the area. This feature helps reduce the cost, offsetting the fact that the deposit is relatively lower grade.

TMR: There is a slight uptick in cash costs globally, too.

ER: C1 cash costs rose globally by 10% last year and 14% in South Africa. We don’t see any end in sight for cost increases in the medium term. We forecast annual increases of around 10% in the next few years. Labor costs in South Africa have increased at a double-digit pace for the past 30 years. We don’t expect that to change.

TMR: Will price increases outpace cash cost increases, or are they in lockstep with each other?

ER: That hasn’t been the case. We’ve seen prices decline and costs increase, which has deteriorated profit margins. The moment we see a cyclical turnaround in demand growth—again focusing mostly on the European auto market—there could be stronger price increases, which would help alleviate some of that margin pressure on profits.

TMR: How are the institutional investors playing the platinum space?

ER: Investors have been exiting the market over the past 18 months because they reached their long-term price objectives, or shorting the market because of short-term demand weakness. Investors mostly look at the PGMs as an industrial metal and treat it as a cyclical investment. The futures market has expanded in the PGM space remarkably during the past several years. It’s a much different market than it used to be.

Another thing to point out in the futures market is the gross short positions of non-commercials, which are at multi-year highs. Non-commercials are the market participants like money managers and traders, rather than commercial market participants who use the futures market for hedging purposes.

Even though there has been tremendous growth in long positions over the past several years, since H2/12, gross short positions increased to near-record levels. There’s a huge increase in market participation, but also a lot of bearish signs with regards to the growth in short positions. That’s indicative of the entire precious metals complex. All the precious metals are experiencing multiyear highs in gross short positions of non-commercials. We could see some turnaround in the latter half of this year or next year that could be pretty significant.

TMR: Given the strong industrial demand factors then, do you see more offtake agreements coming in this space?

ER: I think what we are seeing is some more interesting financial structures going on in the precious metals industry overall. We’re seeing a lot more metal streaming agreements, for instance.

TMR: Any parting thoughts?

ER: Last year was a turning point in South African supply. It has filtered into decisions on labor issues in the country and the overall industry. Going forward, we are going to see a lot of development at the government, company management and labor union levels in how wages are negotiated and how unions approach labor disputes, which could be a long-term positive for the certainty of supply flow.

The strikes in 2012 were not new to the PGM market. The heightened level of violence certainly was new. That triggered what we are beginning to see as a long-term improvement in labor structure in the country. Investors should watch to see if that provides more certainty. There could be some long-term shifts in certainty and supply flow.

CPM Group actually just released its Platinum Group Metals Yearbook 2013, which includes final 2012 statistics for platinum, palladium and rhodium supply and demand as well as projections for the rest of 2013. In this edition, we’ve included disaggregated PGM secondary supply statistics for the first time, and those are broken down by spent auto catalyst, old jewelry and end-of-life electronics recycling. It’s a great, in-depth resource for investors interested in PGMs.

Erica Rannestad is a commodity analyst at CPM Group. Rannestad covers the precious metals and agricultural softs markets as well as currency markets. She is responsible for building CPM Group’s supply and demand statistics for the precious metals Yearbooks and Long-Term Outlook reports. Rannestad is currently most closely monitoring the silver and platinum markets, providing near- and medium-term price forecasts for these metals in CPM Group’s Precious Metals Advisory, a monthly publication. Rannestad also often contributes to and supports CPM Group consulting projects and regularly presents CPM Group’s market views at conferences and seminars around the world. Rannestad holds a Bachelor of Science degree in finance from Fordham University’s Gabelli School of Business.

Want to read more Metals Report interviews like this? Sign up for our free e-newsletter, and you’ll learn when new articles have been published. To see a list of recent interviews with industry analysts and commentators, visit our Metals Report <href=”#interviews” target=”_blank”>homepage.

DISCLOSURE:

1) Brian Sylvester conducted this interview for The Metals Report and provides services to The Metals Report as an independent contractor.

2) The following companies mentioned in the interview are sponsors of The Metals Report: None. Streetwise Reports does not accept stock in exchange for services.

3) Erica Rannestad: I or my family own shares of the following companies mentioned in this interview: Platinum Group Metals LTD. I personally am or my family is paid by the following companies mentioned in this interview: None. My company has a financial relationship with the following companies mentioned in this interview: None. I was not paid by Streetwise Reports for participating in this interview. Comments and opinions expressed are my own comments and opinions. I had the opportunity to review the interview for accuracy as of the date of the interview and am responsible for the content of the interview.

4) Interviews are edited for clarity. Streetwise Reports does not make editorial comments or change experts’ statements without their consent.

5) The interview does not constitute investment advice. Each reader is encouraged to consult with his or her individual financial professional and any action a reader takes as a result of information presented here is his or her own responsibility. By opening this page, each reader accepts and agrees to Streetwise Reports’ terms of use and full legal disclaimer.

6) From time to time, Streetwise Reports LLC and its directors, officers, employees or members of their families, as well as persons interviewed for articles and interviews on the site, may have a long or short position in securities mentioned and may make purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market or otherwise.

Streetwise – The Gold Report is Copyright © 2013 by Streetwise Reports LLC. All rights are reserved. Streetwise Reports LLC hereby grants an unrestricted license to use or disseminate this copyrighted material (i) only in whole (and always including this disclaimer), but (ii) never in part.

Streetwise Reports LLC does not guarantee the accuracy or thoroughness of the information reported.

Streetwise Reports LLC receives a fee from companies that are listed on the home page in the In This Issue section. Their sponsor pages may be considered advertising for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1734.

Participating companies provide the logos used in The Gold Report. These logos are trademarks and are the property of the individual companies.

101 Second St., Suite 110

Petaluma, CA 94952

Tel.: (707) 981-8999

Fax: (707) 981-8998

Email: [email protected]

 

Choosing the Right REIT ETF

By The Sizemore Letter

It may seem like madness to suggest buying REITs at a time when yields are soaring and anything associated with “income investing” is getting slammed.  But with many popular REITs down 30% or more, now is precisely the time to start digging around for value.

This bond market selloff roiling all income-focused securities may very well continue for a while, and I don’t recommend trying to catch the proverbial falling knife by calling an exact bottom in REIT shares.  But at the very least, you can build a watch list of your favorite names and average into them on any weakness.  This has been my approach in my own income-focused portfolios.

But what about REIT ETFs?

Given the popularity of REITs, a plethora of ETFs have sprung up, each offering a slightly different approach to the asset class.  While I prefer to cherry pick a portfolio of my favorite REITs, REIT ETFs may be a great option for smaller accounts or investors who prefer a “one stop shop” approach.

I’ll go through several familiar (and probably not so familiar) names today.

 

REIT

Ticker

Dividend Yield

AUM

Expenses

Vanguard REIT ETF

$VNQ

3.37%

$34.68 billion

0.10%

SPDR Dow Jones REIT

$RWR

2.84%

$2.13 billion

0.25%

iShares Cohen & Steers Realty Majors

$ICF

2.86%

$2.87 billion

0.35%

iShares Dow Jones US Real Estate

$IYR

3.52%

$5.78 billion

0.47%

 
Let’s start with the biggest and most popular ETFs in the segment, which hold the largest-cap equity REITs.  In this space, we have the Vanguard REIT ETF ($VNQ), the SPDR Dow Jones REIT ($RWR), the iShares Cohen & Steers Realty Majors ($ICF) and the iShares Dow Jones US Real Estate ETF ($IYR).  

What is immediately striking about this group is the pitifully low yield on RWR and ICF.  For an asset class that is ostensibly income-focused, that is simply not a high enough yield to warrant serious consideration.

Each of these ETFs uses a slightly different index to track the sector, but their top ten holdings are nearly identical.  Simon Property Group ($SPG) is the single largest holding in all four ETFs, and HCP Inc ($HCP), Public Storage ($PSA), Vornado ($VNO), and Equity Residential ($EQR) feature prominently as well.

While there is nothing “wrong” with these large-cap REITs, some of them have yields that are a little less than impressive for securities that were designed to be income vehicles.  Simon Property Group, the largest holding in all four ETFs, yields only 2.9%.

Some of these REITs—and Vornado has been a high-profile case of this in recent years—have evolved away from pure landlording and have moved to become “deal making” growth vehicles in which property speculation is as important (or more so) than collecting rent checks.  Again, there is nothing inherently “wrong” with this, but it may not be what you are looking for if you consider yourself an income investor.

LC REITS

Figure 1: Large-Cap Equity REIT ETFs

Not surprisingly, since all four large-cap REIT funds hold substantially the same securities, they tend to track each other pretty closely (see Figure 1).  Given that these are index investments with no active management in place, the smartest course of action is to buy the ETF with the highest yield and lowest management fee.  This leaves us with the Vanguard REIT ETF and the iShares Dow Jones US Real Estate.

The iShares Dow Jones US Real Estate has a slightly higher current yield (15 basis points) though its management fee is 37 basis points higher.

Normally, I would call that close enough to be a wash.  But the Vanguard ETF is a purer play on actual property-owning equity REITs, whereas the iShares fund has exposure to mortgage REITs and to non-REIT development and holding companies such as Alexander and Baldwin ($ALEX), which, among other things, produces sugar and coffee on Hawaiian plantations.

For broad large-cap REIT exposure, go with Vanguard’s VNQ.  I would consider this appropriate for a long-term asset allocation, and—in the interests of full disclosure—that is exactly how I utilize it myself.

Specialty REITS

 

REIT

Ticker

Dividend Yield

AUM

Expenses

PowerShares KBW Pr Yield Equity REIT

$KBWY

4.36%

$71.81 million

0.35%

IQ US Real Estate Small Cap ETF

$ROOF

4.48%

$39.41 million

0.69%

iShares FTSE NAREIT Residential

$REZ

2.96%

$309.76 million

0.48%

iShares FTSE NAREIT Retail

$RTL

2.95%

$20.83 million

0.48%

iShares FTSE NAREIT Residential

$FNIO

2.72%

$12.5 million

0.48%

As I mentioned in the section above, cap-weighting tends to skew the large-cap REIT ETFs towards a handful of very large REITs that tend to have mediocre yields. This brings me to two small-to-mid-cap REIT ETFs:  The PowerShares KBW Premium Yield Equity REIT ($KBWY) and the IQ US Real Estate Small Cap ETF ($ROOF).

There is a lot to like about the small-cap sector.  Because the REITs are smaller and less followed by Wall Street, you can often find better pricing and higher yields.  You have to do your homework and look at the underlying property portfolios for signs of over concentration in certain markets or deteriorating tenant quality.  But with that added bit of work comes the potential for a lifetime of higher dividend payments.  And of course, with an index fund like KBWY or ROOF, you can avoid the homework by just buying the entire basket.

Unfortunately, both KBWY and ROOF are small in terms of assets under management and have fairly thin trading volumes.  So, you have to be careful when buying or selling and you should use a limit order.

And ROOF may be somewhat poorly named, as it includes both mortgage REITs and traditional equity REITs. (For anyone needing a review, “equity REITs” hold properties whereas “mortgage REITs” hold mortgages and mortgage derivatives. One is an investment in real assets; the other in paper.)

I like KBWY’s portfolio and consider it worth owning alongside the large-cap Vanguard REIT ETF.  National Retail Properties ($NNN) is a core holding in several income portfolios I run, and I consider Omega Healthcare Investors ($OHI), Government Properties Income Trust ($GOV), and Health Care REIT ($HCN) to be solid income producers.

And what about sector REIT ETFs?

iShares has multiple offerings on this front, but none are exceptionally appealing.  The iShares FTSE Industrial/Office REIT ETF ($FNIO) has 32% of the portfolio in just two stocks—ProLogis ($PLD) and Boston Properties ($BXP).  It also has a pitiful $12 million under management and trades only 3,000 shares per day.  This ETF may not be in business a year from now.

Likewise, the iShares FTSE NAREIT Retail REIT ETF ($RTL) is heavily weighted in just one stock—Simon Property Group, at 22% of the portfolio—and trades just 8,000 shares per day.

The iShares FTSE NAREIT Residential REIT ETF ($REZ) is the only sector REIT ETF that has any volume to speak of, at 70,000 shares traded per day, but even this is too low a volume for a larger portfolio.  This residential REIT ETF is also the best diversified of the lot, though I do not consider apartment REITs particularly attractive at current prices and yields.

With the housing market recovering and with the Echo Boomers (aka “Generation Y” or the “Millennials”) now, for the most part, moved out of their parents’ basements and into apartments of their own, the strong demand that has underpinned the sector is looking a little more tepid.  This doesn’t mean that the sector is facing a pending crash, mind you.  But I don’t see the growth going forward, and 2.9% is not a high enough yield to warrant holding based on income alone.

And finally, I should say a word about mortgage REITs.  Mortgage REITs operate like “virtual banks,” borrowing cheaply short term and using the proceeds to buy long-dated mortgages.  The difference between the two is the “spread,” which varied based on the term structure of interest rates.

Rising bond yields have wrecked the book value of the REITs’ mortgage holdings and have prompted investors to dump the securities en masse.  But going forward, a steeper yield curve is actually good, as it increases the spread between the borrowing rate and the lending rate.

The question you have to ask yourself as a potential investor is this: Has the curve finished steepening, or do we have a ways to go?

If believe, as I do, that the hike in Treasury bond yields is a short-term blip and not a major regime shift, then mortgage REITs as a sector make sense.  Many of the larger names—such as Annaly Capital Management ($NLY) now sell for well below book value.

But I should be clear here: while equity REITs are solid “buy and hold” investments for investors who want exposure to real, income-producing assets, mortgage REITs most assuredly are not.  They are closer to publically traded hedge funds and are nothing more than highly-leveraged paper-shuffling vehicles.  Mortgage REITs should be viewed as a trade, not a long-term investment.

On the ETF front, there are two mortgage REIT funds of note: the Market Vectors Mortgage REIT ETF ($MORT) and the iShares FTSE NAREIT Mortgage Plus Index ETF ($REM), which currently yield 9.25% and 11.15%, respectively.  Though please note that mortgage REIT dividends are fair less consistent than equity REIT dividends.

Note: There are plenty of REIT ETFs I left out of this write-up either due to lack of assets under management and liquidity concerns or due to the fact that, in my estimation, they added no noteworthy new exposure that wasn’t already covered by another ETF.

Disclosures: Sizemore Capital is long NNN and VNQ. This article first appeared on InvestorPlace.

SUBSCRIBE to Sizemore Insights via e-mail today.

Roger Wiegand Predicts a Brand New World for Gold

Source: Peter Byrne of The Gold Report (6/24/13)

http://www.theaureport.com/pub/na/15382

The quant who produces Trader Tracks newsletter tells The Gold Report that the technical charts project a brightening future for precious metals. Technical market analyst Roger Wiegand tracks annual trading cycles while keeping an expert eye on potentially disruptive world events. He is a stickler for fundamentals, though, when it comes to picking out the best juniors for safe bets in a cash-poor industry.

The Gold Report: In early 2012, Roger, you predicted that the price of gold would rise to over $2,000/ounce ($2,000/oz) during the year. But as the overall stock market increased in value, the yellow metal went in the opposite direction. What happened?

Roger Wiegand: Two things happened. First, the last gold peak almost made it. It went to $1,923/oz, and that was a technical and fundamental top. Then it sold down. The other thing that happened is that the U.S. Treasury intentionally sold gold to protect the stock and bond markets. Treasury feared that if gold ran up too high too quickly, people would dump securities en masse.

We are in the seasonal cycle when many markets go sideways. We have seen the selloff at the end of last week. A triple bottom is extremely bullish. The snap back in the price going long could be impressive.

TGR: What factors are keeping gold down in the near term?

RW: Gold is taking a pounding since the big bullion banks have full control and they have to cover their radical short positions taken at the behest of the FOMC and U.S. Treasury to preserve the fiat markets. Briefly, they kept the gold market under control to prevent a runaway for the FOMC and are now using TARP bank capital and derivative dollars to drive gold to the basement. Next, they are accumulating all the gold bullion they can to preserve their wealth in the forthcoming legendary crash. In addition, they get to buy it on the cheap as the dumb money is in full exit in fear.

Also, China, South Korea and Japan have problems and each central bank is dealing American bonds. Recently, China sold American paper through its own markets in order to offload Treasury bonds for currency. All kinds of problems are looming in China; some experts claim that China’s export trade numbers are only half of what was actually reported. South Korea is clearly weakening, and Japan is experiencing an emergency, causing it to stimulate at twice Mr. Bernanke’s rate. That is simply unsustainable. Japan is the Achilles heel of the whole financial system. If the yen runs away, it’s a disaster.

What does that mean for gold? Starting in August, the price will likely rise until the end of September. Then harsh political and economic factors will create serious problems in the global markets: I’m calling for a 50% correction in the U.S. stock markets in Q4/13.

TGR: In your June 6 newsletter, you said that we are on the verge of a brand new world.

RW: The brand new world is imminent because the lessons of 2008 were not learned. The banks are doing the same bad things they were doing before the crash, only worse. The derivative markets are larger now than they were back then. A huge number of student loans might well be written off. And the real estate market is doing a rerun. Incredible! People with foreclosures who may not be qualified for a new mortgage are receiving Federal Housing Authority-insured loans in a desperate effort to try to prop up the home loan industry, which is a major sector of the U.S. economy.

We are in a depression, not a recession. The real numbers for unemployment in the U.S. are 25%. They were 25% in the 1930s. In Spain, 54% of the workers under age 25 are unemployed. The down-the-hill slide is global and in slow motion. People still believe a lot of media nonsense, but this market simply has not corrected. The ultimate jobs program will be a new war.

TGR: Where do you think a war will break out, Roger?

RW: Iraq is cranking up for another round. War is on the agenda in Turkey. Libya has bad problems, not to mention the horror that is Syria. China is beating a war drum, but that’s just talk. North Korea is not capable of going to war. But more wars over energy resources will continue to break out in the Middle East.

War creates jobs. World War II ended the Depression of the 1930s. I don’t think there will be a nuclear war, but three or four conventional wars can go on simultaneously, hire a lot of people, square away the economy and get things righted in the bond market.

TGR: Given such a dismal scenario, how will that affect the price of bullion and shares in gold mining firms?

RW: In the short term, gold and silver shares will follow the futures and cash markets. We are still in a corrective phase, which can last for another six weeks. But once gold and silver start to climb, the shares will follow. It’s a big mistake right now for people to unload shares in good junior companies just because the stock has been beaten down. The companies with good fundamentals and enough cash to sustain operations for the next two to three years are going to do better. Look for good management with a project next door to a senior that is going to buy out reserves. Cash-starved greenfield juniors out in the middle of nowhere with no senior around to buy them out will not make it. It is like the salmon going upstream—some fish fall by the streamside, some make it home to nest.

TGR: What technical tools do you use to analyze the future of gold?

RW: I look at the Market Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ), which is the Index for the juniors group. Right now, the graph of that technical tool looks like an upside down head and shoulders, and that’s very bullish. It is going to take a few more weeks for the junior stocks to pick up steam.

TGR: Do you have any junior names that meet your criteria for success?

RW: Watch California Gold Mining Inc. (CGM:TSX.V) at $0.08/share. The company has top management from Northern Gold Mining Inc. (NGM:TSX.V). It is located in a region with gold mining activity historically. Six mines are in various stages at that location. California Gold Mining stock had a low of $0.03 and a high of $0.24/share. Technically, we add the high and low and divide by two and find a 50% retracement. That is half of $0.27 or almost $0.14. The company has money and it has strong backers.

One of the standards out there that has been very good to our readers for the last four years is Timmins Gold Corp. (TMM:TSX; TGD:NYSE.MKT). It is a steady play, always on the upswing. When the futures and the cash markets rise, Timmons runs alongside. The near-term price is between $2.50 and $2.75/share. We’re looking at $2.85 to $3/share in the next 30–60 days, roughly.

We have followed Canasil Resources Inc. (CLZ:TSX.V) for years. It is trading around $0.055/share. Rounding to $0.06, we are looking at $0.125 as a goal within 90 days. A key point with Canasil is it is primarily a silver exploring company in northern Mexico. Its partner is MAG Silver Corp. (MAG:TSX; MVG:NYSE), and the two companies just signed a partnership agreement, expanding a major project with an injection of several million dollars. MAG Silver has a lot of capital. MAG Silver’s Peter Megaw is one of the top geologists in the business. He told me that the company plans to build a 100 million ounce silver reserve and make it as big as the biggest of the precious metal mines in Mexico. So far, it is doing exactly that. Canasil also has some wonderful projects in British Columbia that just got permits.

At Trader Tracks, we like Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. (SCZ:TSX.V; 1SZ:FSE) at CA$1.15/share. We are looking for a 50% retracement back to CA$1.75/share.

And there is Gold Standard Ventures Corp. (GSV:TSX.V; GSV:NYSE) in Nevada, right next door to Newmont Mining Corp. (NEM:NYSE). The chief geologist for Newmont has done the exploratory work and the results look good. The firm’s shares have big support by some very wealthy investors and are going up. The price was down to CA$0.50/share in May, and it is at CA$0.67 today. Gold Standard Ventures is the perfect example of a company that is building good reserves next door to a senior that, in my opinion, is going to buy it out.

One of our old favorites is Hecla Mining Co. (HL:NYSE). Today, it is at $2.79/share. The company went through a spate of problems during the last three years. But after settling a lawsuit with the Environmental Protection Agency, it expanded the Lucky Friday mine in Idaho. It bought out Rio Tinto Plc’s (RIO:NYSE; RIO:ASX) partnership shares there. It now totally owns the Greens Creek project on Admiralty Island in Alaska, which has a silver life of 50 years. That island mine was running on electricity generators, and now it is connected by wire to the mainland. Hecla has been busy with a gold mine in northern Mexico in an area that is very rich, with four seniors operating in the region. We are looking for a high of $4.88/share in three to six months. Hecla’s stock likes to go to $8 or $9/share, and then retreat on a correction.

TGR: Roger, can you tell us what kind of technical information you look at to come up with your recommendations?

RW: I am mainly a chartist and a technician, but one cannot neglect the fundamentals, particularly considering the state of political economy in the world. First off, does a firm have good management? Is it located in an area that’s politically reliable? Does it have expertise in engineering and geology? Then, we look at valuations.

Remember, if you want to find gold or silver, go where the old mines have been prolific. Just because a lot of ore has been pulled out successfully does not mean that there is not more there to be mined. California Gold is a perfect example. The two big mines that Hecla runs in Idaho and Alaska are examples. The old mines in northern Mexico are loaded with silver. First Majestic Silver Corp. (FR:TSX; AG:NYSE; FMV:FSE) is an intermediate-size miner in Mexico that has done exceedingly well. Its stock is lofty in price, but the company continues to prove its way down the road and make money by expanding the business.

After assessing the fundamentals, we examine the technical side with a long-range chart of 5 or 10 years. Then we narrow it down to a one-year chart. We next narrow it down to the cycles. Historically, gold and silver do very well between Nov. 1 through April. From May through mid-August, everything slows down. The annual fall rallies start the second or third week of August and run until the middle of October. Traders and investors in gold and silver know that the two big contracts in Q4 for gold and silver are the December futures, and they expire in November.

TGR: The futures explain the cycles?

RW: Yes. August gold is not that big a deal. December is the really big one for gold. In silver, March is the big one. July is less important. September is big because it’s in the middle of the peak season going higher. The other big cycle for silver is December. So keep these cycles in mind when trading and investing. Those are the times of year a trader or investor with average experience can profit from quantification. Chart the time of year when prices consistently bottom out and then start to rise.

TGR: Any junior names for us outside of North America?

RW: We follow Global Minerals Ltd. (CTG:TSX.V; DPF:FSE) in Slovakia. It has great reserves. It is a previously exploited, proven mine. Slovakia is a business-friendly, Westernized country with all the big auto and consumer companies operating there. Global Minerals had a dewatering project that went on for about eight months. The pumping is completed, and the engineers and geologists are working at the 3,000-foot level, doing the exploratory work for the next move.

TGR: Do you own stock in Global Minerals?

RW: I trade futures and commodities. Because I recommend stocks for the Trader Tracks newsletter, ethically I cannot buy them. That breaks my heart, sometimes, because I’ve seen some dandies that I knew were going to do well. But I personally trade futures in gold, silver, currencies, the energy sector and grains.

TGR: Any parting advice, Roger?

RW: Please have patience, gold investors. Some analysts are predicting crazy numbers, like $900/oz. Not me.

TGR: Thanks, Roger.

Roger Wiegand—aka Traderrog—produces Trader Tracks newsletter to provide investors with short-term buy and sell recommendations and give them insights into political and economic factors that drive markets. After 25 years in real estate, Wiegand has devoted intensive research time to the precious metals, currency, energy and financial market for more than 18 years. He creates a weekly column forJay Taylor’s Gold, Energy & Tech Stocks newsletter.

Want to read more Gold Report interviews like this? Sign up for our free e-newsletter, and you’ll learn when new articles have been published. To see a list of recent interviews with industry analysts and commentators, visit our Streetwise Interviews page.

DISCLOSURE:

1) Peter Byrne conducted this interview for The Gold Report and provides services to The Gold Reportas an independent contractor. He or his family own shares of the following companies mentioned in this interview: None.

2) The following companies mentioned in the interview are sponsors of The Gold Report: Timmins Gold Corp., MAG Silver Corp., Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd., Gold Standard Ventures Corp. and Global Minerals Ltd. Streetwise Reports does not accept stock in exchange for its services or as sponsorship payment.

3) Roger Wiegand: I or my family own shares of the following companies mentioned in this interview: None. I personally am or my family is paid by the following companies mentioned in this interview: None. My company has a financial relationship with the following companies mentioned in this interview: None. I was not paid by Streetwise Reports for participating in this interview. Comments and opinions expressed are my own comments and opinions. I had the opportunity to review the interview for accuracy as of the date of the interview and am responsible for the content of the interview.

4) Interviews are edited for clarity. Streetwise Reports does not make editorial comments or change experts’ statements without their consent.

5) The interview does not constitute investment advice. Each reader is encouraged to consult with his or her individual financial professional and any action a reader takes as a result of information presented here is his or her own responsibility. By opening this page, each reader accepts and agrees to Streetwise Reports’ terms of use and full legal disclaimer.

6) From time to time, Streetwise Reports LLC and its directors, officers, employees or members of their families, as well as persons interviewed for articles and interviews on the site, may have a long or short position in securities mentioned and may make purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market or otherwise.

Streetwise – The Gold Report is Copyright © 2013 by Streetwise Reports LLC. All rights are reserved. Streetwise Reports LLC hereby grants an unrestricted license to use or disseminate this copyrighted material (i) only in whole (and always including this disclaimer), but (ii) never in part.

Streetwise Reports LLC does not guarantee the accuracy or thoroughness of the information reported.

Streetwise Reports LLC receives a fee from companies that are listed on the home page in the In This Issue section. Their sponsor pages may be considered advertising for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1734.

Participating companies provide the logos used in The Gold Report. These logos are trademarks and are the property of the individual companies.

101 Second St., Suite 110

Petaluma, CA 94952

Tel.: (707) 981-8999

Fax: (707) 981-8998

Email: [email protected]

 

Stunning Chart Shows Gold and Silver Defy Bulls’ Optimism

By Elliott Wave International

Gold and silver have been all over the financial news.

On Thursday, June 20, silver fell below $20 (-60% from 2011 high), and gold fell below $1300 (-30% from 2011 high).

We first published the chart below after metals plunged in mid-April. It shows EWI’s forecasts not only leading up to those big moves … but during the past three years of opportunity.

Three years of volatile price action in these two markets is plain to see. And the forecasts speak for themselves.

Overwhelmingly, most metals experts favored the other side of the gold and silver trend for the past three years – and they still do today. Meanwhile, EWI subscribers were prepared ahead of time for nearly every important turn.

Now, some periods are more vexing than others. But currently we are in a period where the wave patterns are particularly clear.

Metals prices may bounce higher near-term – like we warned they would do after the April 16-18 lows – but the quotes on the chart clearly show how countertrends are the source of opportunity. And that is the great strength of pattern analysis via the Elliott wave method, along with tools like sentiment, momentum and price.

For a limited time you can see the full story in metals in a free report from EWI. See below for more details.


FREE Gold Video from Elliott Wave International

Elliott Wave International forecasted nearly every major trend and turn of the past three years in gold and silver. If you invest in precious metals, you owe it to yourself to see how we got to where we are today. In a 10-minute video titled Gold Defies Bulls’ Optimism, Elliott Wave International’s Chief Market Analyst Steve Hochberg lays out what has transpired in gold since 2011 so you can understand where it’s headed next.

Click Here to See the Video Now — It’s FREE by joining the largest Elliott wave community at no cost >>

This article was syndicated by Elliott Wave International and was originally published under the headline Stunning Chart Shows Gold and Silver Defy Bulls’ Optimism. EWI is the world’s largest market forecasting firm. Its staff of full-time analysts led by Chartered Market Technician Robert Prechter provides 24-hour-a-day market analysis to institutional and private investors around the world.

 

June 23rd- How we scored 7.7-8% gains in a few days in DXM

By activetradingpartners.com

We alerted our stock swing traders to an opportunity in DXM on Friday, June 14th.  We felt the stock was poised to move to the upside near term and it was time to enter. This was after watching the stock on our watch list for many days and following the behavior of the stock and how it trades.

Armed with this information, we advised our traders to buy from 17.40-17.90 per share if possible that day.

2-3 trading days later we we booked gains at 8% and 7.7% gains respectively taking 1/2 off the table on each sell alert sent to our traders.

Below are the actual Email/Text alerts sent to our traders:

June 17th- 230pm EST- 

“DXM- 19.15-Sell 1/2 take 8% profits, hold 1/2 long”

June 18th- 10am EST

“DXM- 19.07 Time to punch out final 1/2 and take 7.7% or so gains”

Consider joining us for Stock and 3x ETF alerts, where you receive both a SMS Text Message and E-mail  on buys and sells, and daily updates on open positions. Learn more at www.activetradingpartners.com