The Gold Meltdown – What Happened?

The Gold Meltdown – What Happened?

In today’s Trade School video, we’re going to be looking into what caused the recent meltdown in gold prices. How could gold drop so precipitously in such a short time, given what’s going on in the world? Did it have anything to do with the ETF GLD or was a country forced to sell its precious metals to satisfy creditors?

I will share with you how you could have systematically made money in gold using our Trade Triangle technology, which has produced some very positive results over the years.

Since 1975, there have been 13 bear markets with an average drop around 14%. This would put gold below the $1,300 level, around $1,280.

In this short 4 minute video on gold, I will illustrate the importance of having a solid game plan and a market-proven approach. We will go through each trade in gold and share with you the results of using our Trade Triangle approach from the beginning of the year.

This approach is not for everyone, but we think you will agree that the results certainly speak for themselves.

For more information on the tools I use in this video visit: here

Adam Hewison
President, INO.com
Co-Creator, MarketClub

 

Book Review: The Little Book of Big Profits from Small Stocks

By The Sizemore Letter


The “Little Books” series has produced several memorable titles, such as Joel Greenblatt’s The Little Book that Beats the Market.  Greenblatt offers a mechanical investing strategy that involves very little work on the part of the reader.  You simply build a portfolio of 30 stocks from his screener and re-run his “Magic Formula” screen on an annual basis.

Hilary Kramer’s Big Profits from Small Stocks is not that kind of book.  Kramer does not offer a trading strategy or a proprietary screener.  Instead, she teaches her readers how to think for themselves.

Kramer, herself a Wall Street veteran, has carved a niche for herself in an area where most professional money managers are afraid to tread: low-priced stocks trading for less than $10 per share.

As Kramer points out, most mutual fund managers and other institutional investors could not buy low-priced stocks like these even if they wanted to; their investment mandates forbid it.  But even if they have the ability, few have the intestinal fortitude.  Their own research departments generally won’t cover the stocks, and it’s a career risk to buy a stock that is too far out of the mainstream.  As the old saying goes, “no one ever got fired for buying IBM.”  But if a manager bets big on a smaller company that ends up going bust, they might be out of a job.

Not all low-priced stocks are good buys, of course.  As Kramer writes, “Many stocks under $10 are cheap because they deserve to be.  They are dogs that never had potential, were permanently damaged by the recession, of have misstepped so badly they have no hope of ever getting back on track.”

Still, there are potential gems for those investors willing to do the research and look.  It is here that you’re most likely to find a “break out” stock.  Due to the mechanics of the market, it’s generally a lot easier for a $5 stock to go to $10 than for a $50 to go to $100.  Yes, the percentages are the same.  But lower-priced stocks tend to be low-capitalization stocks as well.  A large institutional investor like a Warren Buffett moving into a small cap stock is going to move the price a lot more that he would in a large, liquid stock with an enormous float.  The key is finding these gems before the big boys do.

Kramer notes that low-priced stocks are a great place to find fallen angels, or large (formerly) blue chip companies that have fallen out of favor for various reasons, such as missing an overly optimistic earnings forecast or lack of direction from management.  In looking for a fallen angel, you have to ask two questions: What went wrong? And can it be fixed?

Kramer gives the example of Ford, a stock that she bought during the pits of the 2008-2009 crisis.  It’s pretty easy to see what went wrong with Ford.  Their product line had gotten stale, they owned too many non-core brands, they had too much debt, and they had obligations to the United Auto Workers they could never hope to honor.  But could these be fixed?  Well, at least in the short-term, yes.  Ford revamped its lineup, sold off some of its non-core brands, and restructured some of its debts and union obligations.  Oh, and in the process, Kramer’s investment soared from $2 per share to $18 two years later.

You cannot do a screen for fallen angels and buy them as a group.  You really have to examine each on a case-by-case basis and make a judgment call.  There are, alas, no short cuts!

All large companies start small, and low-priced stocks are often a good place to find up-and-coming growth stocks. Often times, these are going to be companies in non-sexy industries, such as junkyards or waste collection.  Though Warren Buffett usually buys larger companies, some of his outsized returns over the years have been due to his willingness to buy companies in “boring,” unglamorous industries.

Finally, low-priced stocks are a great place to find companies in the “good old bargain bin,” or companies selling for less than their book value.

Kramer identifies two sectors in particular that tend to be good hunting grounds for low-priced stocks.  The first is one that I would advise caution in exploring: medical and biotech stocks.  Biotech stocks often have “binary” outcomes.  They produce a new “it” drug and enjoy returns of hundreds or thousands of percent or they don’t, and they end up going bust.  Still, if medical technology is an area of expertise for you, it might be worth your while to give these stocks some attention.

Kramer’s other hunting ground is one that I am a fan of myself—emerging markets.   With Europe, Japan and the United States all mired in long-term debt and demographic problems, emerging markets will be some of the few reliable sources of growth in the years ahead.

But here too, you need to be careful.  What makes these stocks potentially attractive is that they are not widely covered by Wall Street.  But part of the reason they are not covered is that they don’t have much in the way of public reporting, and what they do have may or may not be in English.

Plus, you might have a hard time buying them.  Many do not trade in the U.S., or if they do it is on the “over the counter” markets, which tend to be thinly traded.  So, you’ll need a broker that will give access to foreign exchanges.

A low-priced investment strategy is a value approach of sorts, but it is different from the sort of value approach that many investors are used to taking.  For example, Kramer maintains that the price/earnings (P/E) ratio, which is a basic metric known to all value investors, is generally not applicable to the low-priced stocks she covers:

“We are looking for signs of improvement and plans to continue or return to a growth trajectory.  For example, the P/E ratio isn’t going to help us pick these kinds of stocks.  After all, the P/E ratio requires the current share price and the earnings per share price for a stock.  And often low-priced stocks have little to no earnings at the time they are poised to become breakout stocks, or show earnings that are cyclically depressed”

As a case in point, Ford had P/E ratio of 88 when Kramer bought it because its earnings had been gutted in the crisis.  You don’t really care what the earnings were yesterday; you want to estimate what they will  be tomorrow.

There is a lot of investing wisdom in the pages of Big Profits from Small Stocks, and Kramer has chosen her hunting grounds well.  I don’t always pay attention to academic work in finance because a lot of it is nothing more than a very sophisticated way of stating the obvious.  But there was one 1992 landmark paper by Eugene Fama and Kenneth French titled “The Cross Section of Expected Stock Returns” that basically proved that value investing and small-cap investing outperform over time.  Kramer’s low-priced stock approach is really a small-cap value strategy.

In any event, Kramer’s approach will work best during or immediately following a crisis, when the market is full of fallen angels that were the proverbial baby thrown out with the bath water.  During times of relative market calm—such as today—there are simply going to be fewer opportunities and the ones that are out there will require more research to find.

I recommend you keep Kramer’s book on your shelf and give it a read next time we get a good market sell-off.

SUBSCRIBE to Sizemore Insights via e-mail today.

We Can Barely Stop Laughing

By Bill Bonner

Whoa! On Friday, gold got whacked hard – down $63. It’s barely holding above $1,500.

Is this the end for the bull market in gold? Everybody says so. From The New York Times:

In Pocatello, Idaho, the tiny golden
treasure of Jon Norstog has dwindled… A $29,000 investment that Mr.
Norstog made in 2011 is now worth about $17,000, a loss of 42%.

“I thought if worst came to worst and
the government brought down the world economy, I would still have
something that was worth something,” Mr. Norstog, 67, says of his foray
into gold.

Gold, pride of Croesus and store of
wealth since time immemorial, has turned out to be a very bad investment
of late. A mere two years after its price raced to a nominal high, gold
is sinking — fast. Its price has fallen 17% since late 2011. Wednesday
was another bad day for gold: The price of bullion dropped $28, to
$1,558 per ounce.

And this was before gold tumbled on Friday.

We can barely stop laughing.

This sad sack “investor” thought he would make money by putting $29,000 into gold stocks.

Ha-ha. Wrong on all counts. He thought gold was an “investment”… he
thought an amateur speculator could make money in gold stocks… and The New York Times thought he was an investor.

And now The New York Times thinks gold is going down. Why?

Now… things are looking up for the
economy and, as a result, down for gold. On top of that, concerns that
the loose monetary policy at Federal Reserve might set off inflation — a
prospect that drove investors to gold — have so far proved to be
unfounded.

So Wall Street is growing increasingly
bearish on gold, an investment that banks and others had deftly marketed
to the masses only a few years ago.

Ha-ha. Do you remember Wall Street deftly marketing gold to the
masses a few years ago? Show us the ads! Give us the brokers’ phone
logs! Prove it!

The fact is, the masses never got anywhere near gold. Not even close.
Most people have never seen a gold coin… and few are as reckless as
the aforementioned Mr. Norstog. Most are even more reckless! They’ll
wait for gold to hit $2,000… or $3,000 before they buy.

Which is why we’re nowhere close to the top. Wall Street never
marketed gold deftly… or any other way. Not even in its usual greedy,
heavy-handed fashion. And the masses never bought it.

Just the opposite. As the price of gold rose, we saw ads in the paper
soliciting people to SELL gold. The masses held gold parties… in
which they sold their golden heirlooms at preposterously low prices.

And those concerns that money printing by central banks would cause trouble that have “so far proved to be unfounded”? Well, stay tuned!

The Good News About Gold

More good news from the NYT:

On Wednesday, Goldman Sachs became the
latest big bank to predict further declines, forecasting that the price
of gold would sink to $1,390 within a year, down 11% from where it
traded on Wednesday. Société Générale of France last week issued a
report titled “The End of the Gold Era,” which said the price should
fall to $1,375 by the end of the year and could keep falling for years.

Why “good news”? Because the more bearish on gold Wall Street
becomes, the more the rubes and pumpkins sell. The more they sell… the
cheaper it is for the smart money to buy.

Yes, dear reader, we hope Goldman and SocGen are right. We’d like to see gold crash down around $1,300… or lower.

First, because this would mark a real correction in the bull market.
It’s been going on for 12 years without a serious correction. Not a
healthy situation. We’d like to get the correction out of the way…
shaking out the Johnnies-come-lately and the two-bit speculators. Then,
the final stage in the bull market could begin.

Second, because it gives us a chance to buy more. Because no matter
what noise you hear in the press or in the street, central bankers are
far more reckless than Mr. Norstog. The monetary authorities are
convinced that they can revive sluggish economies by printing money…
and they’ll continue printing until all hell breaks loose.

Then, when the dust settles… when pounds, pesos, yen, euros and dollars have all been beaten and bruised… there will be one currency still standing tall. That will be gold.

Regards,

Bill Bonner

Bill

 

Gold’s Demise “Still in Early Stages” as Price Drops Below $1400

London Gold Market Report
from Ben Traynor
BullionVault
Monday 15 April 2013, 06:00 EST

SPOT MARKET gold prices fell to a two-year low below $1400 an ounce Monday morning, extending Friday’s drop that took gold into bear market territory under the definition of a 20% fall from its peak.

Silver fell as low as $23.11 an ounce, its lowest level since October 2010, as stocks and commodities also fell while the Dollar gained.

Gold in Sterling meantime also fell to two-year lows near £900 an ounce, while gold in Euros fell to €1061 an ounce, its lowest level since July 2011.

Last Friday saw the Dollar gold price end the day down 5%. By late Monday morning in London gold had dropped another 6% from where it opened in Asian trading this morning.

“Previous episodes of gold dropping more than 3% in one day were typically followed by either a sharp rebound or a period of consolidation,” says a note from UBS.

“Given the forcefulness of the move over the last couple days, some correction may be in store up ahead. But given the damage to market sentiment, gold would have to work that much harder to rebuild trust. With no clear catalysts expected in the immediate future, the burden falls on physical markets and long-term holders: how they respond to these lower levels will be key in determining gold’s journey from here.”

The world’s largest gold exchange traded fund SPDR Gold Trust (ticker: GLD) ended Friday with 1158.6 tonnes of gold backing its shares, the lowest volume since April 2010.

Over in India, the world’s biggest gold buying nation traditionally, gold imports in the first quarter of the year were down nearly 24% from the same period last year, according to the Bombay Bullion Association. In January India’s government raised the import duty on gold to 6%.

Compared to the start of last week, the gold price is down around 12%, while silver is down 15%.

“The demise of gold is still at an early stage,” reckons ABN Amro commodities strategist Georgette Boele.

“Other assets will become increasingly more attractive as the growth outlook improves.”

“Some of the key pillars of the gold bull market look like they’re suffering fatigue,” adds Peter Richardson, chief metals economist at Morgan Stanley Australia.

“The gold market’s probably started to price in the prospect that beleaguered members of the Eurozone might be forced to sell gold to raise part of the funding, and there are much bigger holders in that category than Cyprus.”

“This may be the correction that gold needs,” Suggests legendary hedge fund manager Jim Rogers.

“If it goes down enough, I will start buying it.”

“I love the fact that gold is finally breaking down,” adds Gloom, Boom & Doom Report publisher Marc Faber, “because that will offer an excellent buying opportunity…the bull market in gold is not completed.”

The Greek economy meantime is expected to return to growth by 2014, the troika of international lenders the European Commission, the European Central Bank and the International Monetary Fund said Monday.

Over in China the Shanghai Gold Exchange said Monday it may increase trading margins on gold and silver contracts as a result of sharp price falls.

China’s economy meantime grew at an annualized rate of 7.7% in the first quarter, down from 7.9% in the final three months of 2012, official figures published Monday show.

“Industrial production is unexpectedly weak and that’s the source of weakness in GDP,” says Tim Condon, Singapore-based head of Asian economic research at ING.

“Based on this, the consensus forecasts for GDP are going to be headed lower and we’ll certainly be looking at ours.”

Ben Traynor

BullionVault

Gold value calculator   |   Buy gold online at live prices

 

Editor of Gold News, the analysis and investment research site from world-leading gold ownership service BullionVault, Ben Traynor was formerly editor of the Fleet Street Letter, the UK’s longest-running investment letter. A Cambridge economics graduate, he is a professional writer and editor with a specialist interest in monetary economics. Ben can be found on Google+

 

(c) BullionVault 2013

Please Note: This article is to inform your thinking, not lead it. Only you can decide the best place for your money, and any decision you make will put your money at risk. Information or data included here may have already been overtaken by events – and must be verified elsewhere – should you choose to act on it.

 

Central Bank News Link List – Apr 15, 2013: BOJ upgrades assessment of all nine regions on global pickup

By www.CentralBankNews.info Here’s today’s Central Bank News link list, click through if you missed the previous link list. The list comprises news about central banks that is not covered by Central Bank News. The list is updated during the day with the latest developments so readers don’t miss any important news.

When This Indicator Hits 19, Stocks Always Rally… And it Just Did Again

By WallStreetDaily.com

I know that James Surowiecki achieved “bestsellerdom” in 2004 by telling us that there’s wisdom in crowds. That, collectively, humans make much more informed decisions than individuals.

What a total crock! (At least when it comes to investing.)

As Humphrey B. Neill observed, “When everybody thinks alike, everyone is likely to be wrong.”

And there’s no better proof of this than investor sentiment.

As I shared in July 2012, when bullish sentiment hits extreme lows, stocks almost always rally.

Well, guess what? Bullish sentiment just cratered.

Bulls Run Scared

Every week, the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) measures investor sentiment. And the latest bullish sentiment reading ranks as nothing short of jaw dropping.

It plummeted 45%, from 35.5 to 19.3. That’s the largest weekly drop in over a decade, folks.

What gives? I mean, stocks just hit another record high, and suddenly investors don’t feel bullish at all?

So much for embracing the notion that the trend is our friend.

Here’s what you need to know… I’ve said it before, and I’m sure I’ll say it again – when virtually no one is optimistic about the stock market, that’s all the more reason we should be bullish. Just take a look at the data and tell me you disagree…

As you can see, when the AAII bullish sentiment reading drops below 25% during the current bull market, stocks (almost) always rally over the next three and six months.

Of course, the latest reading is way below 25%, which got me thinking about what happens when we get really extreme lows.

So I went ahead and analyzed the data all the way back to 1987 – the year AAII started tracking sentiment.

My findings are equally compelling. (But only for those of us with the guts to be contrarians and ignore the “wisdom” of crowds.)

More Evidence You Should Ignore the Masses

Since 1987, bullish sentiment has dipped below 20% on 26 separate occasions. So you can’t dismiss the findings as anomalies.

And just like today, when bullish sentiment readings are extremely low, the implications for stocks couldn’t be more, well… bullish!

  • For 24 out of 26 occurrences, stocks jumped higher three months following a low sentiment reading. That works out to 92.3% of the time. The average gain? 6.5%.
  • And for 25 out of 26 occasions, or 96.2% of the time, stocks shot higher six months following a low sentiment reading. The average gain? An impressive 13.4%.

Such much for the wisdom of crowds, huh?

Bottom line: You’re not going to find a more accurate contrarian indicator in the market. When bullish sentiment tanks, forget bailing on stocks. Consider backing up the truck, instead.

Or as Bespoke Investment Group wrote in a note to clients, “The historical evidence suggests that investors who turned bearish may want to change course.” True that!

Ahead of the tape,

Louis Basenese

Article By WallStreetDaily.com

Original Article: When This Indicator Hits 19, Stocks Always Rally… And it Just Did Again

Beware the ‘Safety Bubble’, But Don’t Sell Stocks Yet

By MoneyMorning.com.au

Safe investments are safe.

And risky investments are risky.

Sounds right…until it isn’t.

The chief investment officer of one of the world’s biggest funds management firms fears that the US stock market has built a ‘safety bubble’.

That is, the rush by investors to buy ‘safe’ assets has forced prices higher, making those assets overvalued and putting them in bubble territory.

It looks as though those Americans are at it again, creating another bubble. But they aren’t alone. The same game is playing out here. Here’s how to make sure the stock market doesn’t catch you out…

If you’re a long-time Money Morning reader you’ll know we have a simple asset allocation strategy.

We suggest you split your wealth into ‘safe money’ and ‘punting money’. The amount you allocate to each is up to you. It depends on your attitude to risk, the returns you’re after, and the risks you’re prepared to take.

If you’re a low risk investor and you’re not after big returns, you’ll have a bigger exposure to ‘safe money’ than you will to ‘punting money’.

To give you a rough idea of what we consider ‘safe money’, we put cash, term deposits, gold and silver, and dividend stocks into this category.

In the ‘punting money’ category we put growth stocks, other commodities, blue-chip growth stocks and small-cap stocks.

It’s an effective strategy. And it has worked pretty well over the past two years since we started talking about it. However, some of the biggest returns have come from the least likely source…

Safe Money Becoming Punting Money

Two years ago we rightly pointed out that it would be a tough time for growth stocks. We suggested that you only view growth stocks (blue-chip stocks and small-cap stocks) as ‘punting’ investments.

At the same time we told you to have a decent cash buffer and a good exposure to dividend paying stocks. Our belief was that if stocks didn’t go up then at least you would get better-than-the-bank cash dividends.

Owning dividend stocks was good advice. But not only for the reasons we had expected.

As it turned out you did get better-than-the-bank dividends, but you got something else you perhaps didn’t bank on — growth stock-style capital gains.

It’s these major gains that have Seth Masters, chief investment officer of Bernstein Global Wealth Management calling the rise in dividend stocks a ‘safety bubble’.

Masters told Bloomberg News:

‘Many stocks with high dividends don’t have growth potential. Their payout is their primary appeal. Utility stocks, for instance, [are perceived to] have safe dividends. So a lot of people are buying them.

Recently they were trading at a 50 percent premium to their historical average valuation. That’s their biggest premium ever.’

We know what he means. We’re looking to put some cash to work in the family retirement fund. Our initial thought was to put it in the stock market…into something safe…into a dividend stock.

But then we remembered that dividend stocks aren’t the safe stocks they used to be. Masters is right, there is something of a ‘safety bubble’ among Australian dividend stocks.

It’s not normal for a safe and boring food stock or bank stock to gain 50% in just over a year. That’s especially so when earnings have risen marginally, or in some cases fallen.

So, does that mean you should avoid dividend stocks altogether? If only investing was that easy…

Dividend Stocks are Still a Good Bet

In short, despite the threat of a ‘safety bubble’, we still believe it’s too early to sell stocks. That means you shouldn’t sell dividend stocks yet either.

We will give you one word of caution: although dividend stocks may not have shifted from ‘safe money’ to ‘punting money’, they aren’t the safe investment choice they were two years ago. So you need to be careful before you buy a dividend stock.

But we don’t want to put you off buying dividend stocks.

Last Friday we showed you a chart that compared Australian dividend yields with dividend yields on overseas stocks. Australian yields are about 70% higher than overseas stock yields.

That’s attractive to foreign investors.

The market has fallen in the past few weeks and so have the share prices of dividend stocks. That should give you the chance to buy dividend stocks at a cheaper price than three or four weeks ago.

Just be aware of the valid warning from Seth Masters. Most dividend stocks are low growth. That means you shouldn’t expect to make a killing on these stocks with capital growth.

But the combination of dividends and even modest capital growth makes income stocks a better over the next 12 months than cash, term deposits or other fixed interest investments.

If you’re happy to take on the higher risk, and you want a bit more than the returns you can get in a bank account or fixed interest investment, then dividend stocks are still a good bet.

Just remember that unlike cash, the value of shares can go down…that even goes for ‘safe’ dividend stocks.

Cheers,
Kris

Join me on Google+

PS. A new feature in Money Morning each day is Money Morning Premium. Each day we’ll take the theme from the main issue of Money Morning and turn it into an investable idea. To gain access to Money Morning Premium you just need to make a small change to your subscription. Click here to find out how…

From the Port Phillip Publishing Library

Special Report: TORRENT SIGNAL 3

Daily Reckoning: Why Europe’s Debt Crisis is Barely Getting Started

Money Morning: Rick Rule: You’re Either a Victim or a Contrarian

Pursuit of Happiness: Why the NBN is Dead Before it’s Begun

Australian Small-Cap Investigator:
How to Make Money From Small-Cap Stocks

The Euro’s Moment of Truth is Fast Approaching

By MoneyMorning.com.au

‘Nothing to see here. Move along.’

That was the message from European Central Bank (ECB) boss Mario Draghi at his press conference.

Draghi, clearly keen to draw a line under the Cyprus panic, argued that the eurozone would begin to bounce back within a few months. He gave only the vaguest hint that he might loosen monetary policy.

As a result, the euro has remained steady against other currencies. In fact, with Japan embarking on a money-printing spree, it’s even strengthened a little.

But don’t be fooled. The deal over Cyprus is already coming undone, and other countries look set to follow.

The time for Draghi to ‘put up or shut up’ on his promise to save the euro is fast approaching — and you don’t want to be holding the single currency when it does…

Cyprus Needs to Raise Another €6bn

Former German chancellor Helmut Kohl recently admitted that there is no way that Germany would have joined the single currency had there been a popular vote.

This is hardly a situation unique to Germany. The progress of the eurozone project has been one long sorry tale of voters being ignored and sidelined by ambitious political elites.

However, now that they’re in the euro, voters from Greece to Italy have backed away from the chance to exit the single currency. You can understand why. While quitting the euro might speed these countries’ recoveries in the longer run, savings and pensions would take a big hit.

But a turning point might be approaching. Cyprus is being asked for even more money to contribute to its own bailout.

Here’s a quick reminder of the story so far. Cyprus was thought to need around €17bn to bail out its banks and keep its sovereign debt at bearable levels. The troika (Europe and the International Monetary Fund (IMF)) were only willing to lend €10bn.

So Cyprus needed to raise the rest itself. And that’s why it ended up deciding to pinch a load of money from people with big deposits in its banks.

Trouble is, the Cypriot government made such a mess of organising this bank levy that lots of large depositors managed to get their money out of the country. Meanwhile, because of the damage to its banking sector, the Cypriot economy is expected to shrink severely in the next few years.

In all, this means the cost of the bailout has now risen to €23bn. And team IMF is not prepared to chip in any more money.

In other words, Cyprus has to find another €6bn. Nothing is out of bounds it seems, with the country potentially having to sell three-quarters of its gold reserves, valued at €400m, to help raise the money.

But that’s just €400m. Where’s the rest going to come from? ‘Depositors and bank bondholders’, that’s who, says Jonathan Loynes at Capital Economics. Given that Cyprus is already so tightly squeezed, it must be getting to the point where leaving the euro is no worse than staying within it.

And these aren’t problems that can be kicked down the road. Due to the revenue raised from tax being lower than previously thought, Cyprus will go bankrupt unless it gets an infusion of cash in less than a fortnight. It is by no means certain that a deal will be agreed before this happens.

The Cypriot Fear is Starting to Spread

Meanwhile savers and bondholders in other eurozone countries are starting to worry that they will suffer a similar fate to those in Cyprus. It’s a domino effect — with haircuts in one country leading to panic about another.

The fact that the troika has refused to step in automatically to protect banks is a big worry for small countries with outsized, or broken banking sectors. The latter group includes Estonia, Luxembourg and Slovakia. But the two most immediate concerns are Slovenia and Malta.

Most experts agree that Slovenia’s banks are a mess. Over one in seven loans are ‘non-performing’, (i.e., have little hope of being repaid). This means the government will either have to bail them out, or force depositors to take losses.

Combined with the deficit, a bailout could see Slovenia’s debt rise by at least 15% of GDP. Because of this, the yield on Slovenian bonds has begun to spike upwards by nearly 2% in the last fortnight alone.

Another problem case is Malta. Like Cyprus it has a huge banking sector (equivalent to seven times GDP). While some of this is due to banks using it for the purposes of moving money between their individual sub-groups, this still represents a substantial risk.

As Capital Economics points out, there are few bank bondholders to bear the brunt of any losses. This means that depositors could be hit if there is a crisis.

On top of all this, there’s the other significant problem that the eurozone economy is incredibly weak. GDP for the region is expected to shrink both this year and next. The larger countries are suffering too – France is expected to go into recession, while even Germany will stagnate.

It looks as though the ECB is going to be forced to follow Japan’s lead and boost the money supply aggressively. In other words, sooner or later, expect money-printing in the eurozone.

Matthew Partridge
Contributing Editor, Money Morning 

Publisher’s Note: This article first appeared in MoneyWeek

Join Money Morning on Google+

From the Archives…

Australia: The Home of World Beating Dividend Stocks
12-04-2013 – Kris Sayce

Investors: Ignore Japan’s Yen Devaluation Game
11-04-2013 – Murray Dawes

What Japan’s Economic Disaster Means for Australia
10-04-2013 – Dr. Alex Cowie

Gold Bulls About to Win the War
9-04-2013 – Dr. Alex Cowie

A Better Inflation Bet Than Gold…Stock Market Investing
8-04-2013 – Kris Sayce

An Odd Way to Play America’s Crumbling Roads

By MoneyMorning.com.au

I live in the Washington, DC, area, and the Capital Beltway — the vital road network of the region — is crumbling. ‘Under the surface of all but some recently restored segments,The Washington Post reports, ‘fissures are spreading, cracks are widening and the once-solid roadbed that carries about a quarter-million cars a day is turning to mush.

The 64-mile highway that rings the nation’s capital is nearing the end of its useful life. It may be too late to fix it already. Instead, it is time to rip it up and lay a brand-new roadbed from bare earth.

Besides this, road congestion is terrible and commuting times keep rising. (Fortunately, I work out of a home office. My commute is a flight of stairs.)

Crumbling America’s Roads

Of course, what’s happening here is a microcosm of what’s going on all over the US. The Beltway is, as the Post reports, ‘one roadway among the tens of thousands at the end of a long and fruitful life span.

You have undoubtedly heard by this point about the dilapidated state of American roads and bridges and the huge sums to fix them all.

And no, this isn’t a piece about investing in stocks that benefit from having to rebuild it all. Quite the opposite, actually. I don’t think the government ever makes the investments needed. For why, consider this quote from James O’Connor, author of The Fiscal Crisis of the State:

‘Transportation costs and hence the fiscal burden on the state are not only high but also continuously rising. It has become a standard complaint that the expansion of road transport facilities intensifies traffic congestion. The basic reason is that motor vehicle use is subsidized and thus the growth of the freeway and highway system leads to an increase in the demand for their use.’

This is simple economics. You subsidize something, people use more of it. In the case of the nation’s road systems, they are the progeny of tax dollars. Few who use the roads pay the full cost of their use — especially when you consider the costs of things such as pollution or even gasoline.

So the O’Connor thesis is that the more money the state dumps into roads, the more demand rises. The result is a never-ending spiral, except that demand rises faster than the ability of the state to pay for it. Hence, you reach a crisis at some point. O’Connor’s book came out in 1973, I should note — 40 years ago. This theme is one of those that took a long time to play out.

It seems we are close to that breaking point now, though. The road is so bad in parts that just laying new asphalt won’t do it. ‘The underbed is rotten,’ the Post writes, ‘so a fresh asphalt surface doesn’t last. As the surface gets rough, traffic slows and backups begin. When the surface needs more frequent repaving, traffic backs up.

In the past, I’ve pointed my readers to invest in road building. We owned, for example, Astec Industries for little more than a year in 2008–09. Astec makes equipment needed for road building.

We didn’t own it long because it didn’t take long to see that the needed investment dollars weren’t coming. Even today, you look at a five-year chart of that stock and you see it’s just been marking time and going nowhere.

So let’s forget about investing in infrastructure stocks. Doing so yields an investment thought process of an entirely different kind. It takes as its beginning that all these trends just get worse.

Americans will spend more time idling away in traffic. Congestion will continue to raise the cost of transporting goods. Costs to use this network will just go up and up. Thinking of it in this way, it signals a crisis for an old order and perhaps the birth of something new.

The New Trend to Back in the USA

The old order — namely corporate giants — benefitted tremendously from subsidized roads. What is Wal-Mart without the ability to send its cheap, China-imported crap across the country’s subsidized road networks? In fact, just about any business that depends on this infrastructure as part of a competitive cost advantage will find tougher competition than those that don’t.

The latter group would include locally sourced production that saves money on transportation costs. This is part of what’s contributing to the revival of American manufacturing and hurts China’s export model. Being near your market will be more important in the 21st century.

In the 20th century, the dominant trend of Corporate America was to get bigger. It was, as historian Robert Sobel described it, ‘the age of giant corporations.’ Scale and size were winning combinations.

In the 21st century, I think the winning formula will be a very different mix. States are broke and the infrastructure, not just the roads, disintegrates. Local businesses that serve local markets more efficiently than the big guys will be where you’ll want to put your money.

Chris Mayer
Contributing Editor, Money Morning

Join Money Morning on Google+

From the Archives…

Australia: The Home of World Beating Dividend Stocks
12-04-2013 – Kris Sayce

Investors: Ignore Japan’s Yen Devaluation Game
11-04-2013 – Murray Dawes

What Japan’s Economic Disaster Means for Australia
10-04-2013 – Dr. Alex Cowie

Gold Bulls About to Win the War
9-04-2013 – Dr. Alex Cowie

A Better Inflation Bet Than Gold…Stock Market Investing
8-04-2013 – Kris Sayce