Market Trends 24.01.2013

Source: ForexYard

printprofile

Hey Everyone,

Below are some market trends for today.

Good luck!

-Dan

Gold- May see downward movement today
Support- 1666.47
Resistance- 1693.29

Silver- May see downward movement today
Support- 30.97
Resistance- 32.44

Crude Oil- May see upward movement today
Support- 94.33
Resistance-96.73

Dax 30- May see downward movement today
Support- 7604.25
Resistance- 7749.47

EUR/USD May see upward movement today
Support- 1.3186
Resistance- 1. 3370

Read more forex news on our forex blog

Forex Market Analysis provided by ForexYard.

© 2006 by FxYard Ltd

Disclaimer: Trading Foreign Exchange carries a high level of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. There is a possibility that you could sustain a loss of all of your investment and therefore you should not invest money that you cannot afford to lose. You should be aware of all the risks associated with Foreign Exchange trading.

Market Review 24.01.2013

Source: ForexYard

printprofile

The Australian dollar saw significant gains against the JPY last night, following the release of positive Chinese manufacturing data which boosted investor confidence in the global economic recovery. The AUD/JPY advanced close to 100 pips following the news, eventually reaching as high as 94.02.

The Chinese news also helped the EUR/USD gain more than 40 pips. The pair, which peaked at 1.3346, saw a slight downward correction during the early morning session and is currently trading at 1.3325.

Signs of progress in negotiations between US lawmakers to increase the federal government’s borrowing limit caused gold prices to continue falling last night. The precious metal lost more than $8 an ounce during the Asian session, and is currently trading at $1680.

Main News for Today

German Flash Manufacturing PMI- 08:30 GMT
• Forecasted to come in slightly higher than last month
• If the indicator comes in above the expected 47.1, the euro could see upward movement during mid-day trading

US Unemployment Claims- 13:00 GMT
• Forecasted to come in slightly higher than last week’s, which if true, would be a sign that the employment situation in the US is getting worse
• If the indicator comes in above the forecasted 359K, the dollar could take losses during afternoon trading

US Crude Oil Inventories- 16:00 GMT
• Forecasted to come in significantly higher than last week’s result, which if true, would be a sign of decreased demand in the US and may cause oil prices to turn bearish

Read more forex news on our forex blog

Forex Market Analysis provided by ForexYard.

© 2006 by FxYard Ltd

Disclaimer: Trading Foreign Exchange carries a high level of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. There is a possibility that you could sustain a loss of all of your investment and therefore you should not invest money that you cannot afford to lose. You should be aware of all the risks associated with Foreign Exchange trading.

Central Bank News Link List – Jan. 24, 2013: Bernanke seen pressing on with stimulus amid debate on QE

By www.CentralBankNews.info Here’s today’s Central Bank News link list, click through if you missed the previous link list. The list comprises news about central banks that is not covered by Central Bank News. The list is updated during the day with the latest developments so readers don’t miss any important news.

EURUSD stays in a trading range

EURUSD stays in a trading range between 1.3256 and 1.3403. As long as 1.3256 support holds, the price action in the range is treated as consolidation of the uptrend from 1.2998 and another rise towards 1.3500 is still possible after consolidation. Only break below 1.3256 will indicate that lengthier consolidation of the longer term uptrend from 1.2661 (Nov 13, 2012 low) is underway, then deeper decline to 1.3150-1.3200 area could be seen.

eurusd

Daily Forex Forecast

How to Play the EU Referendum for Profit

By MoneyMorning.com.au

The trend in politics over the past 20 years has been towards centralisation.

Central governments have gained more power at the expensive of regional and local governments. That’s hardly surprising as central governments have the biggest range of powers to levy taxes…and the greatest power to provide welfare.

Now, before you stop reading and change channels, we’ll assure you this isn’t one of our libertarian rants (we leave that for our new free eletter, Pursuit of Happiness). The reason we bring up centralised government is that one country appears to be on the verge of reversing that trend.

And it could present you with an outstanding investment opportunity

Yesterday, UK Prime Minister, David Cameron gave a long awaited speech on the UK’s relationship with Europe. In the speech he said:

 ‘The next Conservative Manifesto in 2015 will ask for a mandate from the British people for a Conservative Government to negotiate a new settlement with our European partners in the next Parliament.

It will be a relationship with the Single Market at its heart.

And when we have negotiated that new settlement, we will give the British people a referendum with a very simple in or out choice. To stay in the EU on these new terms; or come out altogether.

This could be the big story of the next four years (the EU referendum is due around 2017).

Forget the US debt and deficit troubles. Don’t worry about China’s booming or busting economy (depending on which of our editors you agree with, check out here and here). And as for Europe’s various problems — Greece, Spain, Italy, Ireland, France — forget about it.

Make no mistake, this is a huge story. And not surprisingly, the central planners don’t like it. As the BBC reports:

 ‘In Washington, the White House welcomed Mr Cameron’s “call to remain in the EU”, saying it believed that the UK was stronger as a result of its EU membership.

French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius said a future for the UK outside the EU could be “dangerous”.

French President Francois Hollande was clear about his desire to see the UK remain an EU member…

German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle called for the UK to “remain an active and constructive” part of the EU.

But the biggest message from the Eurocrats is it’s clear they don’t like people having choice. Guido Westerwelle says ‘more integration’ would solve Europe’s problems and that ‘cherry-picking is not an option.

In other words, they want more centralisation and less choice.

So, what does this have to do with investing?

 When George Broke the Bank of England

There’s nothing big investors (and we mean BIG) like more than key events in highly liquid markets.

Big investors like these markets because of the amount of money invested. They also tend to be mature, and importantly, they attract sophisticated investment products. By that we mean derivatives.

Think about the stock market bubbles and crashes…think about the US housing market bubble and collapse…think about commodity market bubbles and crashes — gold, iron ore, and rare earths.

But also think back to one of the most famous investor attacks on a highly liquid and sophisticated market. We’re talking about billionaire investor, George Soros’ attack on Pound Sterling in 1992.

If you’re not familiar with the story, the short version is that the UK was part of the European Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM). The ERM was basically a system where governments and central banks agreed to keep Europe’s various currencies within certain trading bands.

This would involve the central banks working together to buy and sell currencies in order to keep an exchange rate stable. For example, if the German mark was too high against the British pound, the central banks would agree to sell marks and buy pounds.

This agreement fell apart in 1992 when the UK refused to raise interest rates or devalue the pound.

Prior to this, Soros made a huge USD$10 billion bet that the UK would be forced to devalue the pound. It turns out he was right. Despite the UK Treasury’s effort to support the pound, the UK eventually withdrew from the ERM, the pound collapsed, and Soros bagged a USD$1.1 billion profit on his trade.

The mythology of the story is that he ‘broke’ the Bank of England. He may not have done that, but his profit wasn’t bad for a few months’ work!

Our bet is that the big hedge funds will start honing in on the UK economy and its markets. The only question is will they see a UK exit as good or bad for UK investments…

 Why the EU Referendum Will Drive UK Stock Market Down

With the EU referendum still four years away, it’s too early to think about making short term trading profits. Based on the reaction of the FTSE 100 yesterday, right now the markets think it’s pretty ho-hum. The FTSE 100 closed the day up 0.3%.

But even though the EU referendum is a long term event, it’s still worth looking at the market to figure out which way the big hedge funds will play it. And considering the UK stock market is now in ‘overbought’ territory (see Dominic Frisby’s article on the Relative Strength Index) placing a bet on the short side could be a winning trade.

The fact is, we’ve got no doubt that over the next few years the central planners and collectivists will paint a very grim picture of what life will be like for the UK outside the European Union…even though it did pretty well for the previous 900 years without European integration.

And with the next UK election due by 2015, it makes for a fairly unstable four years for the UK markets. That’s why we see the long term trade (2-4 years) for the UK as sell. Especially given the UK’s debt position and the threat to its AAA rating. As the Financial Times reported last December:

The UK’s prized triple-A credit rating could be set for the chop next year, as the big rating agencies reassess its finances…

Remember the most important thing, whatever the reality (we personally think the UK will be better off on the outside), the old stock market saying is ‘buy the rumour, sell the fact’.

Regardless of what really happens to the UK if it leaves the EU, investors in the market will make up their mind before it happens. And if the hedge funds and big investors have anything to do with it, that likely means striking fear into the market and driving it down.

So, how can you trade the UK? Unfortunately, the Australian share market doesn’t have any exchange traded funds for the UK stock market. So the best way to trade the UK is through Contracts for Difference (CFD’s).

Using CFD’s you can buy or sell individual stocks, or our preference is to focus on the index. That gives you the broadest possible exposure to any big bets the big investors may place on the UK economy.

Just be aware that CFD’s are highly leveraged, so they aren’t for everyone. Before you think about getting involved with them, check out the education section of the main CFD providers.

But whatever you do, keep an eye on the UK. Our hunch is that over the next couple of years it will surprise everyone and become the biggest talking point in financial markets.

Cheers,

Kris

From the Port Phillip Publishing Library

Special Report: The Big Money Secret of Ironstone Mountain

Daily Reckoning: The Bank of Japan Fires a Pop-Gun

Money Morning: Here’s Why I’m Proudly Bullish About China’s Economy

Pursuit of Happiness: The WEF: The World’s Biggest Gathering of Socialists, Collectivists and Central Planners

Australian Small-Cap Investigator:
Five Simple Steps to Picking Winning Small-Cap Stocks

Trading the Relative Strength Index: How to Profit from Market Momentum

By MoneyMorning.com.au

Do you like the idea of a trading system that doesn’t involving you staring at the markets every day?

One by which you might make five or six trades a year – certainly no more than ten – in a market that you can get in and out of easily?

And one by which you should comfortably be able to beat an index, such as the FTSE or gold?

Then I may have something for you in today’s Money Morning

How to Profit from Market Momentum

Late last week, I had the pleasure of meeting Andrew Craig who runs the website, plainenglishfinance.com. He’s just published his first book, Own The World, about plucking your finances from the expensive hands of fiends, financial advisors, and fund managers, and taking control of them yourself.

We were discussing how it shouldn’t be that hard to make 15% or 20% a year, and how few fund managers or even private investors manage this. By the time you compound that over several years, you’re talking serious money.

Andrew swears he can beat most markets by using a simple tool called the relative strength index – the RSI.

Let me start by explaining how it works. In short, RSI measures momentum. It’s an indicator of whether something is ‘oversold’ or ‘overbought’. When it reaches ‘overbought’ levels, you sell. When it reaches ‘oversold’ levels, you buy.

Andrew uses it in conjunction with other indicators, both technical and fundamental, but for the purposes of today, we’ll use it by itself.

Most chart websites – such as Big Charts or Stockcharts – give you the option of seeing the RSI beneath whatever price you are looking at.

Below we consider the FTSE 100 over the past year.

chart of the FTSE 100 over the past year

You can see how in May, the RSI went below 30, deeming it oversold. We were in buy-signal territory. Some traders like to use the moment it crosses back through 30 as the actual buy signal. At this point, the FTSE 100 was at around 5,250.

Now that the RSI has gone above 70, it is ‘overbought’. This suggests that you should be thinking about taking profits – or at least sticking in a very tight stop to protect them, if you think the market has further to run. The moment it crosses back down through 70 is the moment many traders use as their sell signal.

Let’s assume that we have a sell signal now, for the sake of argument. At 6,180, you’ve made over 900 points.

With just one trade last year, it involved low commission costs. You didn’t have to spend all your time looking at screens – you could have got on with that important skiing holiday. You got in close to the low for the year and you made about 18%. Nice work!

Why You Shouldn’t Rely on Just One Indicator

Of course, this is just one example where the method happens to have worked well. Back-testing it, there are plenty of examples where it hasn’t.

For example, in a bull market, you tend to get a lot of overbought readings – sell signals – and very few, if any oversold readings – buy signals. You sell, the market carries on its rapid ascent and you miss out. Very frustrating.

(In fact, judging by readers’ emails, investors find missing out on a run even more frustrating than being trapped in a bear market.)

The same applies in a severe bear market. In 2008, for example, there were a lot of oversold readings – which might have made you buy – only for the market to head a lot lower.

This is why RSI tends to work best when used in conjunction with something else. This might be some fundamental analysis you have done or read on a market. Perhaps the economics and financials are such that you really feel you should own a certain asset, and just want to find the best time to get in.

Or it might be another technical tool, such as moving averages, (which I like). Or it might be a tip from somebody, another trader or a newsletter writer, who you follow.

Here’s a good example of why you need to be careful about relying on just one indicator. The chart below shows silver in 2010-11 – when it made that huge run from $15 to $50.

silver price chart 2010-2011

The RSI gave a lovely buy signal at $15 in February 2010. The following October it gave a sell signal at around $23. That made you $8 in as many months.

Very nice trade. Open the champagne.

Then look on in horror as, without giving another buy signal, silver launches all the way to $50 without ever seeing $23 again. (Something similar happened to me, you may remember, as I wrote about taking some profits at, I think, $30.)

That’s why I advise using this indicator in conjunction with something else. Andrew, for example, says he held on when he got his first sell signal on silver because the volumes were so strong. Volume is pretty telling as far as interest in a market is concerned.

Another way to use this indicator – if you have the facility on your charting software – is to change the parameters of RSI. (Stockcharts offers this facility.) I have used website’s default settings above (that’s the 14 day RSI). Playing about, I have found that a ten-day RSI works well for a gold, although it gives you a lot more than one or two trading signals a year.

Currently the major indices – the Dow, the S&P, as well as the FTSE – are all approaching overbought levels.

Dominic Frisby
Contributing Writer, Money Morning

Publisher’s Note: This article first appeared in MoneyWeek

Bill Gross: Beware the Central Banks Bond Playing Game

By MoneyMorning.com.au

Central bankers around the world are enthralled by quantitative easing, says Bill Gross. That should make investors very nervous, says the co-founder of PIMCO, the world’s biggest bond fund.

In his January newsletter, he notes that ‘the world’s six largest central banks have collectively issued six trillion dollars’ worth of checks since the beginning of 2009 in order to stem private sector deleveraging.’

Why do they like QE so much? Well for them it must feel like they’ve found a way to game the financial system, says Gross. ‘The Fed and other central banks such as the Bank of England (BOE) actually rebate the interest they earn on the Treasuries and Gilts that they buy.’ That means that they give the interest back to the government so the Treasury gets to issue debt for free.

Even if interest rates were to rise and losses accrue to the central bank portfolio as bond prices fall, they can just ‘record it as an accounting liability owed to the Treasury, which need never be paid back.’

From a government’s point of view ‘this is about as good as it can get’, says Gross. ‘Money for nothing. Debt for free.’

And that’s exactly why investors should be worried, he continues. Because whenever governments think they’ve found a way to game the financial system, it always goes horribly wrong.

The Madness of Men Doesn’t Change

To make his point he cites the example of the South Sea Bubble in England in the 1700s, when government bonds were sold to finance the exploitation of a far-off, resource-rich land.

‘At the time Sir Isaac Newton was asked about the apparent success of the plan and he responded by saying that “I can calculate the movement of the stars but not the madness of men”. The madness he referred to was the rather blatant acceptance by government and its citizen investors, that they had discovered the key to perpetual prosperity: “essentially costless” debt financing.’

The trouble is, says Gross, that nothing apart from the air we breathe is actually costless. ‘The future price tag of printing six trillion dollars’ worth of checks comes in the form of inflation and devaluation of currencies either relative to each other, or to commodities in less limitless supply such as oil or gold.’

Given that the Fed says it will keep QE until US unemployment falls to 6.5%, the associated economic distortions will continue to grow.

Investors also need to reposition their portfolios, says Gross. They ‘should be alert to the long-term inflationary thrust of such check writing’. That means avoiding long-term bonds ‘confine your maturities and bond durations to short/intermediate targets supported by Fed policies.’ Translation? Beware the bursting of the QE-powered bond bubble.

James McKeigue
Contributing Writer, Money Morning

Publisher’s Note: This article originally appeared in MoneyWeek

From the Archives…

How to Find Stocks for Troubled Times: Keep Scalable Businesses in Mind
22-01-2013 – Nick Hubble

Why It’s Still Not time to Buy the Japanese Stock Market
21-01-2013 – Murray Dawes

Hey, Give The Mining Guys a Break
19-01-2013 – Kris Sayce

Here’s Another Reason to Buy Gold at the ‘Bottom’
18-01-2013 – Kris Sayce

CBA Shares ‘Priced for Perfection’: Sell Now
17-01-2013 – Kris Sayce

Charles Sizemore on Straight Talk About Money

By The Sizemore Letter

Listen to Charles Sizemore discuss the Microsoft ($MSFT)-Dell ($DELL) deal, investing for income, the “Great Rotation” from bonds into stocks and more on Mike Robertson’s Straight Talk About Money.

If you cannot view the embedded player, you can follow this link: Straight Talk About Money

The post Charles Sizemore on Straight Talk About Money appeared first on Sizemore Insights.

Where are my Metatrader Log files?

By Martin Yerfo

This tip is to debunk the conspiracy theories about Forex Brokers deleting your trade journal in order to erase evidence of their wrongdoing; since we started discussing the Virtual Dealer Plugin people have sent us many inquiries of the whereabouts of the trade Journal.

The problem is that in some systems when you right click on the Journal Tab of the MetaTrader 4 Terminal and choose open, the folder where the Journal is stored opens but it is empty, no files at all, the assumption is that the broker has reached out from the Internet and deleted the files; but in this case is not your broker, the cause for this strange behavior lies on a new Windows Feature called UAC (user account control).

Users of MetaTrader 4 running under Windows Vista or any future versions like Windows 7 may find it impossible to locate the trade Journal and the Expert’s logs at their usual location. For example on a typical Windows XP installation the path to the journal would be something like:

C:\Program Files\FOREX.com FT\Logs

On the same install in a Windows 7 you would think to look at the same location for the Journal at:

C:\Program Files (x86)\FOREX.com FT\Logs

But after navigation to the above folder you find that it’s empty, the reason is that windows has moved all the data to a especial folder called the Virtual Store, which is inside the user’s folder under the name of the current user in a folder about 6 layers deep. The fastest way to get to the journal is by replacing the driver letter on the path for the words %LOCALAPPDATA%\VirtualStore, let’s give you an example by correcting the above path:

%LOCALAPPDATA%\VirtualStore\Program Files (x86)\FOREX.com FT\Logs

By navigating to the above path you will be able to find all the Journals for your MT4 since you started using this terminal.

To avoid this problem of not being able to easily find the Journals the best solution is to reinstall Meta Trader 4 again on a different folder, the UAC protection is only active if the program is installed under the “Program Files (x86)” folder, my suggestion is to install your MetaTrader 4 terminals on a different folder called C:\Meta Trader\, this way your program will run just like it did on XP and you will be able to right click on the Journal Tab and quickly open the Journal.

By changing the installation folder of MetaTrader 4 you will also be fixing other bad side effects of UAC such as:

* Inability of receiving Updates to the terminal if MetaTrader 4 is installed inside of the UAC protected folder. You should visit the Metaquotes forum and make sure you are running the latest version of the terminal ( http://forum.mql4.com/) at the writing of this article the latest build was 402.

* UAC can also interfere with your trading if you run advanced expert advisor that rely on data that’s been stored in the same folder as MetaTrader 4

* Loading history to get 90% Modeling quality during back-testing into MetaTrader 4 can be very difficult if UAC is on.

I hope this helps you understand that MetaTrader 4 was not design to work well in this conditions and there should be more than enough reasons for you not to run MetaTrader 4 on Windows Vista under the “Program Files (x86)” folder.

About the Author

Full time Metatrader developer, programer, forex trader and marketing director

Professional Metatrader Indicators

 

The REAL Reason Governments Mess Up so Much

By Bill Bonner, billbonnersdiary.com

I have been bent and broken, but — I hope — into a better shape.

— Charles Dickens, Great Expectations

“I told him not to take her back,” said Calvin.

Calvin was our first boss. We went to work for him at 16. In 1964. He was a painter who loved to talk, joke, sing… It was a pleasure to work for him. He knew everyone. And everyone’s business. And he had his own code of conduct, which he was happy to share.

“I told him not to take her back. When a woman runs off one time, she’ll do it again. Besides, if you have a woman you have to worry about, you don’t have a woman worth worrying about.”

It was a no-nonsense judgment. Probably a good one.

“So what happened?”

“She ran off again. With the same guy.”

“Oh… So then what did he do?”

Tommy, her husband, took a philosophical approach.

“Oh… Tommy told me that he didn’t take it personally. She was just that kind of woman. You couldn’t trust her.”

Live and Learn

Tommy may have learned something valuable from the experience. Or not. But that’s what life does to you. You live. And learn. Or not. You can make a mess of things. You can learn a valuable lesson. You go on…

On his own, a man’s errors usually go little further than his own family. His errors are “corrected” by life. He is bent… but usually into a better shape.

Or he is broken…

We learn by trial and error. We try something; if it doesn’t work, we feel the sting of our mistake. We lose money. We lose a friend. Our business or career takes a hit.

But if we don’t try… and don’t make errors… we get nowhere and learn nothing.

Suppose we never suffer from our own mistakes. Suppose someone else does. We put our hand in the fire and feel no pain. But someone in West Virginia gets a blister. We invest recklessly and someone in New York loses money. We moon the mayor at her next press
conference… and someone in Seattle gets arrested.

What would we learn from that?

Error-Prone

We have a line we use in our rare speeches that usually draws a laugh:

You can make a mess of things on your own, but if you really want a huge disaster, you need government support.

Let’s think about it. Is it true?

Government
is the biggest institution on the planet. Talk about large-scale catastrophes and you are necessarily talking about government in action.

But is there any reason to think that governments mess up more often than private businesses or households? Are government mistakes any larger than they should be, proportionally?

Oddly, these questions have never been addressed in any serious way that we know of.

Modern “conservatives” assume government is prone to error — unless it is kicking someone’s butt at home or overseas.

Modern “liberals” think government ought to do more butt kicking — at home. They want it to put the boot to big business… and the rich… and anyone who isn’t green enough.

But why do you need government to pull off a major catastrophe? Is it only because it is big… and it kicks butt?

Not exactly. But almost. Smaller, more civilized institutions — and individuals — make plenty of errors. But their mistakes are usually corrected before they become major disasters.

Let’s say you make investment errors. You buy subprime mortgage-backed debt in 2007. Then… bam! The market falls apart. You lose all of your money. The bad decisions self-correct. Soon, you have no money. You can make no more bad investment decisions.

Or maybe you thought the world would end on 21 December 2012 , as the Mayans seemed to suggest? You jumped off a high building just as the moment arrived, hoping to be taken up in rapture. Well. Problem solved!

Or maybe you made a bad marriage. But you are a good Catholic. You suck it up. You stick it out. Then your wife runs off with the priest. You won’t do that again!

Bent Track

In the private world, problems take care of themselves. Businesses that are badly run go out
of business. People who make mistakes usually don’t make them again. Bad drivers pay higher insurance premiums. Bad chefs lose their jobs. Bad economists become head of the Fed. (Oops… that’s another story.)

That’s because the errors one commits in private life are suffered most by the people who commit them… and those immediately around him.

There is a feedback loop that takes your mistakes around the track and delivers them back to you — with interest. You feel the pain. You suffer the loss. You cringe with embarrassment and shame.

But in larger institutions — even many private corporations — it is often the feedback track that is bent. Some people make mistakes. Other people suffer.

Not surprisingly, these mistakes are detected less quickly and corrected more slowly. That’s how they get to be so big. They are not readily corrected.

More to come!

http://www.billbonnersdiary.com/