W.African central bank holds rate, sees stable inflation

By Central Bank News     The Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO) left its benchmark marginal lending rate unchanged at 4.0 percent and said economic activity in the West African Monetary Union (WAMU) continues to improve and inflation is expected to slow down in the fourth quarter.
    The central bank, which cut its rate by 25 basis points in June, said inflation should slow to 2.5 percent by the end of December due to a better supply of grain and inflationary expectations are broadly in line with the bank’s price stability objective.
    “Average annual inflation is expected to be 2.3 percent in 2012 against 3.8 percent in 2011. In a  horizon of 24 months, the rate is projected at 2.4 percent,” the bank said in a statement issued following the monetary policy committee’s fourth meeting of the year on Dec. 7.
    The annual inflation rate rose to 2.7 percent end-September from 2.1 percent in June due to an upward adjustment in fuel prices and some member states raised prices of cereals and fish products.
    The bank said economic activity continued to strengthen, especially in secondary and tertiary sectors, with industrial production up 3.0 percent in the third quarter after a rise of 3.2 percent in the second.
    Monetary conditions were also favorable with the weekly weighted average interbank transactions rate at 4.13 percent in the third quarter, down from 4.24 percent in the second quarter.
    The central bank implements the monetary policy of the West African Monetary Union, which comprises Senegal, Burkina Faso, Guinea Bissau, Ivory Coast, Mali, Niger, Togo and Benin.

    www.CentralBankNews.info

Global Monetary Policy Rates – Nov. 2012: Interest rates continue to fall, average global rate down to 5.9%

By Central Bank News

    (NOTE TO READERS: Central Bank News is introducing a new feature under the title of Global Monetary Policy Rates (GMPR). GMPR replaces and expands the previous feature titled Global Interest Rate Movements. GMPR will be issued monthly and reviews the monthly changes in official interest rates worldwide.)
   
    Global monetary policy interest rates were cut by 470 basis points during November to an average 5.91 percent from October’s 5.96 percent, strengthening this year’s trend of falling interest rates.
    Benchmark interest rates at the 88 central banks followed by Central Bank News have been declining steadily all year, from an average of 6.42 percent in the first quarter to 6.31 percent in the second and 6.11 percent in the third quarter of 2012.
    In the month of November, eight central banks cut policy rates compared with three banks (Iceland, Serbia and Bulgaria) that raised rates, boosting the number of rate cuts in the first 11 months of this year to 114 compared with 28 rate increases.
    November’s notable rate cuts were by the Czech Republic, Colombia, Poland and Mozambique.
    The Czech Republic joined the exclusive club of central banks that have cut rates to essentially zero; Colombia and Poland have now reversed earlier rate rises to bring rates below their level at the start of the year; Hungary cut further despite high inflation, and Mozambique cut for the sixth time this year but looks like it may have won its battle against inflation.
    More than half of the world’s central banks have cut rates this year, with 45 of the 88 banks followed by Central Bank News cutting in the January-November period compared with 11 central banks that have raised rates. Thirty-two central banks have left rates unchanged in the same period.

        Emerging market central banks were again the most active in loosening their policy in November, with four banks cutting rates while all developed market central banks kept rates on hold.
    The average policy rate in developed market central banks was 1.1 percent in November compared with the 4.8 percent average rate among emerging market central banks, illustrating the limited scope for further rate cuts by central banks in advanced economies.
   In the first 11 months of the year, emerging market central banks have cut rates by a total of 1,026 basis points compared with cuts of 325 basis points by developed market banks.  

    Two-thirds of all emerging markets central banks have cut rates this year while just under half of central banks in developed markets have cut.
    But the true extent of policy easing by developed markets central banks is not fully reflected in these figures as they do not capture the quantitative easing that major central banks have undertaken. Policy rates at the Federal Reserve, the Bank of Japan, and the Bank of England have been at effectively zero since 2009.
    Central banks in frontier markets have been the most aggressive in cutting rates this year, with policy rates cut by a total of 1,523 basis points in the first 11 months, lead by Kenya which cut by 200 basis points in November for a reduction of 700 basis points year-to-date.
    Countering the global policy easing are total rate rises of 1,570 basis points by all central banks in the first 11 months of this year. More than half of this increase is accounted for by Malawi’s total rate hike of 800 basis points – 400 basis points in November alone – as the country struggles with falling foreign exchange reserves and roaring inflation.
    In 2011 the average global monetary policy rate of the 88 central banks followed by Central Bank News was 6.0 percent. This compares with the 2010 average policy rate of 4.3 percent, 5.2 percent in 2009, 7.4 percent in 2008, 6.9 percent in 2007 and 6.2 percent in 2006.
 INTEREST RATE CUTS, YEAR-TO-DATE IN BASIS POINTS, NOVEMBER 2012:

COUNTRY     YTDCOUNTRY     YTDCOUNTRY     YTD
BELARUS-1500HUNGARY-100SOUTH AFRICA-50
UGANDA-1050LATVIA-100SOUTH KOREA-50
KENYA-700MONGOLIA-100SWEDEN-50
MOZAMBIQUE-550PHILIPPINES-100THAILAND-50
VIETNAM-500ALBANIA-75ANGOLA-25
MOLDOVA-400ISRAEL-75CHILE-25
BRAZIL-375ROMANIA-75COLOMBIA-25
TAJIKISTAN-330CZECH REPUBLIC-70EURO AREA-25
GAMBIA-200CHINA-56INDONESIA-25
KAZAKHSTAN-200DENMARK-50MACEDONIA-25
PAKISTAN-200INDIA-50MOROCCO-25
DOMINICAN REPUBLIC-175KUWAIT-50NORWAY-25
CAPE VERDE-150MAURITIUS-50T&T-25
GEORGIA-125NAMIBIA-50W. AFRICAN STS.-25
AUSTRALIA-100POLAND-50BULGARIA-18

Ukraine Crushed in $1.1bn Fake Gas Deal

By OilPrice.com

Certainly the folks at Gazprom are having a good snicker, reveling in the mockery that has been made of what should have been a landmark Ukraine-Spain gas deal that would have loosened Russia’s gas grip on Kiev.

Everyone wondered how Russia would respond to Ukraine’s attempt at gas independence. But this is what happens when you mess with Gazprom.

It was a horrible moment for Ukraine last Monday—all the more horrible because the whole event was televised—when the historical $1.1 billion deal it was about to sign with Spain’s Gas Natural Fenosa turned out to be fake.

Why was the deal historical? It would have secured $1.1 billion in investment for the construction of Ukraine’s first liquid natural gas (LNG) terminal on the Black Sea and a pipeline connecting the country’s vast gas network to the terminal.

More to the point, this would enable Ukraine to import by tanker up to 10 billion cubic meters of European gas at a price 20% cheaper than Gazprom. Even more to the point, it would be a major first step toward reducing Ukraine’s dependence on Russia.

The deal was that investors had apparently signed agreements through a newly formed consortium for the construction of the $1.1 billion LNG terminal.

Here’s how the ill-fated signing ceremony went down:

While Ukrainian Prime Minister Mykola Azarov and Energy Minister Yuriy Boyko were cutting the ribbon on the construction of the terminal in a live televised ceremony, the country’s investment chief, Vladislav Kaskiv, was attending the official investment signing ceremony elsewhere, also via live video feed. This is where walls caved in very suddenly.

Signing on behalf of Fenosa was one Jordi Sarda Bonvehi. At the 11th hour, Fenosa let it be known that they have no idea who Bonvehi is and that he certainly does not represent the company in any way. Fenosa apparently had no idea it was signing a landmark agreement with Ukraine.

Kiev was necessarily taken aback, and Bonvehi remained conveniently silent at the signing ceremony once the news broke out.

Of course, what no one knows is how Ukrainian authorities were led to believe—during multiple rounds of negotiations—that Bonvehi was a Fenosa representative.

The story being bandied about by authorities in Kiev is now that Bonvehi was under the impression that Fenosa would sign the deal with Ukraine and that he would be given the authority to sign the deal retroactively.

But Fenosa denies it has ever considered such a deal and continues to deny any relationship at all with Bonvehi.

So where does that leave us? It leaves Ukraine in the lurch. There is no way it can fund this terminal on its own, despite its claims to the contrary. We probably don’t have to look much further than Gazprom and the Ukrainian oligarchy to find where this beautifully crafted charade was hatched.

In the meantime, Bonvehi—if such a person of that name even exists—remains elusive. No one knows who he really is or who he really works for.

More than anything, it’s an advertisement for due diligence.

Source: http://oilprice.com/Energy/Natural-Gas/Ukraine-Crushed-in-1.1bn-Fake-Gas-Deal.html

By. Jen Alic of Oilprice.com

 

All Eyes on Today’s FOMC Statement

Source: ForexYard

The euro saw gains against virtually all of its main currency rivals yesterday, following the release of a significantly better than expected German ZEW Economic Sentiment figure. Additionally, a positive Spanish bond auction led to an increase investor risk taking. Today, all eyes are likely to be on the US FOMC Statement, scheduled to be released at 17:30 GMT. Speculations that the Fed will announce an expansion of its bond buying program today have caused the US dollar to turn bearish in recent days. If the FOMC Statement includes such an announcement, the greenback could take additional losses as a result.

Economic News

USD – FOMC Statement May Lead to Further Dollar Losses

The US dollar extended its recent bearish trend yesterday, as the combination of “fiscal cliff” worries and speculations that the Fed will initiate a new round of monetary easing caused investors to sell the greenback. Against the Swiss franc, the dollar fell more than 40 pips during European trading, eventually reaching as low as 0.9317, before bouncing back to 0.9330 during the evening session. The AUD/USD shot up some 35 pips during mid-day trading before peaking at 1.0510. By the end of the European session, the pair was trading at the 1.0505 level.

Today, the main piece of economic news is likely to be the FOMC Statement, scheduled to take place at 17:30 GMT. Analysts are widely expecting the Fed to announce an expansion of its bond buying program, which if true, is likely to result in additional dollar losses during evening trading. Additionally, traders will also want to pay attention to the FOMC Economic Projections and Press Conference at 19:00 and 19:15. Any signs of economic expansion in the US from the FOMC may result in investor risk taking, which could send the safe-haven dollar even lower.

EUR – Euro Receives a Boost from German Data

The combination of a significantly better than expected German ZEW Economic Sentiment figure, and a positive Spanish bond auction helped give the euro a boost throughout European trading yesterday. The EUR/USD was able to gain close to 60 pips during mid-day trading, eventually trading as high as 1.2996, before dropping back to the 1.2980 level. Against the Japanese yen, the common-currency advanced more than 50 pips before reaching 107.20. By the beginning of the US session, the EUR/JPY was trading around the 106.90 level.

Today, the euro could see some volatility following the release of the EU Industrial Production figure at 10:00 GMT, with a better than expected result likely to lead to some risk taking in the marketplace. Additionally, the US FOMC Statement is likely to impact the euro as well as the US dollar. If an expansion of the Federal Reserve’s bond buying program is announced, higher-yielding assets, including the euro, are likely to see bullish movement as a result.

Gold – Gold Takes Minor Losses Ahead of Fed Announcement

The price of gold took minor losses during mid-day trading yesterday, as investors anxiously looked for signs regarding the Fed’s upcoming decision on whether to expand its bond-buying program. While the precious metal fell slightly more than $6 an ounce, eventually reaching $1708, analysts were quick to say that significant movements were unlikely to occur before today’s FOMC Statement.

Later in the week, gold traders will not want to forget to pay attention to the Eurogroup meetings, scheduled to take place on Thursday and Friday. Any positive announcements from the meetings regarding the pace of euro-zone economic growth could generate risk taking among investors, which is likely to benefit gold.

Crude Oil – US Inventories Figure Set to Impact Oil Prices Today

Signs of a decrease in global demand for crude oil caused prices to remain close to a one-month low throughout the European session yesterday. While the commodity was able to gain close to $0.50 a barrel during the first part of the day, eventually reaching as high as $86.29, a bearish correction virtually erased all of its gains. By the beginning of US trading, prices were stable at the $85.85 level.

Today, the US Crude Oil Inventories figure, set to be released at 15:30 GMT, is likely to have the biggest impact on oil prices. If the figure comes in below the forecasted -2.6M, it would likely be taken as a sign that demand in the US has gone up, which could help the commodity recoup some of its recent losses.

Technical News

EUR/USD

The Bollinger Bands on the weekly chart are beginning to narrow, indicating that this pair could see a price shift in the near future. Furthermore, the MACD/OsMA on the same chart is close to forming a bearish cross, signaling that the price shift could be downward. Going short may be a wise choice for this pair.

GBP/USD

Most long-term technical indicators show that this pair is range trading at the moment, making a definitive trend difficult to predict. Traders may want to take a wait and see approach, as a clearer picture is likely to present itself in the near future.

USD/JPY

The weekly chart’s Slow Stochastic has formed a bearish cross, signaling an impending downward correction. Furthermore, the same chart’s Williams Percent Range has crossed over into overbought territory. Opening short positions may be the wise choice for this pair.

USD/CHF

While the Williams Percent Range on the daily chart has crossed over into overbought territory, most other long-term technical indicators show this pair range trading at this time. Taking a wait and see approach may be the preferred strategy at this time, as a clearer picture is likely to present itself in the near future.

The Wild Card

DAX 30

The Relative Strength Index on the daily chart has crossed over into overbought territory, indicating that a downward correction could take place in the near future. Furthermore, the Slow Stochastic on the same chart has formed a bearish cross. This may be a good time for forex traders to open short positions ahead of possible downward movement.

Forex Market Analysis provided by ForexYard.

© 2006 by FxYard Ltd

Disclaimer: Trading Foreign Exchange carries a high level of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. There is a possibility that you could sustain a loss of all of your investment and therefore you should not invest money that you cannot afford to lose. You should be aware of all the risks associated with Foreign Exchange trading.

 

The Price of Risk in the Stock Market

By MoneyMorning.com.au

The disparity between the markets and reality on the ground continues to widen. The November NAB survey showed business confidence plummeted to minus 9 from minus 1 in October.

That takes business confidence to the weakest level since April 2009. In April 2009 the ASX 200 was trading near 3,600 or 22% below the level it’s trading at now.

I’m not saying that we should necessarily be trading at that level with business confidence so low but it’s interesting that we had just experienced a stock market crash back in early 2009. Fast forward to today and our stock market has been rallying for six months and is retesting multi-year highs.

Something doesn’t add up.

Either the stock market is getting ahead of itself or the pessimism in business is misplaced…

NAB said that ‘overall the survey implies a significant slowing in underlying demand and GDP growth in the December quarter, both easing to around 2 ¼ per cent – clearly below trend.’

A closer inspection of the ASX 200 shows that the rally isn’t very broad based. There is a large divergence opening up between different sectors of the economy.

Comparison of Australian Sector Indices

Comparison of Australian Sector Indices
Click here to enlarge

Source: Slipstream Trader

The financials make up a huge part of the ASX 200. The big four banks alone are nearly 25% of the index. So when they rally the index goes up.

Looking at the chart you can see that the financials are rallying strongly at the moment. But the small-cap stocks are not being taken along for the ride. The resources stocks have also underperformed since the start of the year, although they’ve picked up some steam over the last month.

Basically we’re seeing the outcome of the US Federal Reserve’s ZIRP (zero interest rate policy). Yields have been forced so low worldwide that anything with a yield is now being bought with ears pinned back.

Commonwealth Bank [ASX: CBA] is now yielding just under 5.5%. I wonder what yield it needs to get to before the market decides that the risk isn’t worth it? 5%? 4%?

If the market is happy to accept a 5% yield on CBA then the price could rally from its current price of $61.00 to around $67.00 based on the last year’s total dividend of $3.34.

So the rising stock market no longer reflects the prospects of the economy, but instead is a function of low interest rates. This begs the question, ‘Is it worth getting a 5% yield if you lose 50% of your capital?’

CBA fell from $62.00 to under $25.00 from 2007 to early 2009. As we approach that $62.00 level again I don’t think it is an outrageous question to ask.

Australian Interest Rates

Australian Interest Rates
Click here to enlarge

Also, if the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) is lowering interest rates due to deterioration in the underlying economy, is that really a signal to buy the stock market? The RBA slashed rates during 2008, and I’m sure you remember what stocks did then.

The level rates are at now is equivalent to where they were after the crash. So either the RBA is panicking or our stock market is oblivious to the risks facing us in the immediate future.

Macroeconomic data continues to deteriorate around the world. China’s trade surplus fell 38% over the last month from $32 billion to $19.6 billion, which is a huge fall. Europe is slowing and going into reverse, Japan is back in yet another recession. America is getting close to stall speed.

But interest rates are lower, so let’s buy the stock market! Yeah, right.

I know I’ve shouted my bearish view from the rooftops, and the fact that we closed yesterday at multi-year highs is making it harder to stick to that view, but it’s only a matter of time until the market tops out and starts heading down again.

The Santa rally appears to be alive and well. We have the FOMC meeting tomorrow night which will probably see the US Fed printing another US$45 billion a month to make up for the loss of Operation Twist.

If there is any good news in relation to the fiscal cliff drama we may indeed see a sharp spike higher in equity markets in the short term.

But unless the RBA plans on dropping rates again in the near term to fire the banks up further, I can’t see the ASX 200 trading that much higher from here.

And I don’t think that RBA governor Glenn Stevens has the stomach to continue dropping rates further in the very near term. A recent article in the Age by Clancy Yeates said that Governor Stevens thinks that, ‘Central banks should be prepared to take the heat out of asset price booms, rather than relying on lower interest rates to “clean up” the mess after bubbles burst.’

If he is prepared to lean on asset bubbles before they become a problem then I don’t think he’ll be that keen to create a bubble by dropping rates too low.

I found another comment by Governor Stevens quite illuminating. He said that:


‘I would have thought that by this point we have to conclude that simply expecting to clean up after the credit boom is not sufficient any more; the mess might be so large that monetary policy ends up not being able to do the job when the time comes.’

I think we all know that that time has already come and gone. ZIRP worldwide and endless money printing is the result.

Murray Dawes
Slipstream Trader

From the Port Phillip Publishing Library

Special Report: The Fuse is Lit

Daily Reckoning:
Why Free Speech is the Most Important of All the Civil Liberties

Money Morning:
Why Silver Could Be the Best Investment in 2013

Pursuit of Happiness:
Government: The Holy Hangman Still Kills

Australian Small-Cap Investigator:
Why Speculating On Small-Cap Stocks is Your Best Bet in a Rigged Market

Peak Oil: Why the US Oil Boom Can’t Solve this Big Problem

By MoneyMorning.com.au

I was at a talk recently where a well-known oil economist made an analogy.

He said that if you gathered up all the crude oil that people have ever pumped out of the ground since Col. Drake drilled his famous well in 1859, it would cover California to a depth of about 10 feet.

‘Of course,’ he said with a smile, ‘we don’t have to worry about California drowning under 10 feet of oil. Over the past 150 years, mankind has taken all that oil, burned it, harnessed the energy and put the combustion products into the atmosphere.’

Everyone in the room laughed… sort of. We got the thermodynamic point, which is that mankind uses a heck of a lot of oil, much of it via four-stroke engines and that well-known cycle: intake, compression, power and exhaust.

Why has mankind used so much oil? Because global population has risen for over a century, right along with oil use. ‘People are energy,’ as Scott Tinker, the state geologist of Texas, says. And people like oil because it’s energy-dense. A little bit of oil goes a long way, if you use it right.

Of course, oil impacts the planet in many ways, good and not so good. Indeed, it’s fair to say that oil defines modernism, even modern civilization.

Take away oil, and much else in our world goes away, starting with Big Government and its far-ranging military and police powers. Take away oil, and most of the world’s people go away, too, sooner or later.

Keep in mind that the world’s oil-dependent energy system has been a century and a half in the making. The world – as we know it – needs a constant oil fix, and that won’t change anytime soon. Not without a major dystopian catastrophe.

Why Peak Oil is the Lens to See What’s Happening Now to Forecast Possible Futures

Enough introduction. Let’s look at some numbers. Every day, the world uses about 84 million barrels of crude oil. That oil, of course, comes out of the ground, from wells scattered pretty much everywhere.

Oil comes from the deserts of the Middle East, the frozen tundra of Russia and Alaska. Oil comes, in huge volumes, from platforms in the Gulf of Mexico and North Sea, and wells off Brazil and West Africa. And oil comes in dribs and drabs from stripper wells across the oil patches of America, Canada and many other locales. You get the idea.

These two graphs illustrate the sources and destinations of the world’s daily oil.

First, look at the production side graph. Note how overall global oil output has flattened out over the past five years or so. Is this the proverbial ‘Peak Oil‘ plateau, the maximum in global output that precedes a long-term decline?

Some people now hate hearing talk about Peak Oil. They won’t have a word of it. The so-called ‘fracking revolution’ is supposed to solve our energy problems for a long time into the future. Between the Eagle Ford play, down in Texas, and the Bakken play, up in North Dakota, the U.S. is in tall cotton, energywise. Or so I’ve been told.

Indeed, lately, I’ve received snarky emails from some readers when I bring up Peak Oil. I’ve been accused of ‘living in 2005′. One reader asked if I knew that the USA ‘will surpass Saudi Arabia in oil output by 2020.’ Well, yes. I received that memo. But there’s more to the story…

I’ve stated many times that the Peak Oil concept is a tool. It’s a lens through which one can observe the world of energy, both to figure out what’s happening now and to forecast possible future scenarios.

In simple terms we’re talking about natural depletion. As we find more ‘fracking’ oil and gas here in the U.S. many ‘conventional’ forms of oil (domestically and globally) are naturally depleting – for example: Alaska’s North Slope, Mexico’s Cantarell field, and other, once-prolific production zones like Siberia and Egypt.

Indeed, to say the current situation in Cairo has solely to do with natural oil depletion is NOT a far stretch of the imagination.

Going forward we’re going to need to produce a lot more oil to make up for this natural depletion. In the U.S. we’re actually seeing that happen – it’s that whole ‘drilling treadmill’ idea that we covered last week.

Point is, as we find more domestic, unconventional energy we have to agree that the global oil production output – when accounting for natural depletion – doesn’t jump off the charts.

Besides, when it comes to Peak Oil, time will tell. I started thinking about Peak Oil back in the 1970s when I met the geologist M. King Hubbert at Harvard. It’s only been 35 years. I can wait.

A Quirk in the Oil Numbers Tells a Story

Let’s get back to those graphs. Look at the one for oil consumption. There’s no recent plateau there, right? Globally, oil demand has been steadily growing. It’s pretty clear that more and more oil is moving and burning across the world.

When you compare the two graphs, there appears to be higher oil ‘consumption’ than there is ‘production’. How can that be? Can the world use more oil than it produces?

The difference in production and consumption between the graphs is due to two main things. First is the growing supply of natural gas liquids (NGLs) – essentially ‘oil’ from gas deposits, such as blowing down traditional gas caps, as well as the recent fracking revolution. Basically, the world supplements its crude supply with NGLs.

That NGL phenomenon will work until it stops working due to the dicey economics of what’s called ‘energy return on investment’ (EROI). That is, at some point, eventually, somebody will figure out that they’re putting a barrel of oil in to get a barrel of oil out.

Whoops! Busted! At the end of the day, you can’t violate the second law of thermodynamics for long. Physics will prevail.

The second aspect of crude oil consumption exceeding production is a quirk of modern technology called ‘refinery gains’. In essence, down at the refinery, there are ways of transforming a barrel of crude into more than a barrel of refined product.

Here’s a graph that’s based on data from BP. The data show that crude oil production has hit a plateau in recent years at around 82-84 million barrels per day. Yet despite flat oil output, it’s apparent that refinery output has steadily increased. Why?

Refinery output has increased due to the proverbial ‘better living through chemistry’. That is, engineers continually figure out more ways to squeeze more barrels of refined product out of the same amount of raw material.

More specifically, refiners take low-cost oil fractions – like distillates, which used to go to asphalt or bunker fuel – and upgrade them to higher-priced chemicals and fuels. More bang for the buck, more bucks for the barrel.

Who’s Burning Oil?

As the graphs up above indicate, oil consumption is growing fast in the Middle East. There, population has exploded in the wake of several decades’ worth of more babies and longer life spans.

That, and there’s rapid, energy-intense industrialization all across the region. Plus, most Middle Eastern nations heavily subsidize energy use by the populace.

Of course, growing internal oil use across the Middle East leaves less oil available for export. Is that a problem? We’re about to find out. We’re exactly on the cusp of that thorny issue. Saudi Arabia’s so-called ‘spare capacity’ is getting squeezed. It’s a problem, and it could transform into a really big problem in short order. Stand by.

The graph above also shows crude oil consumption growing strongly in Asia-Pacific, Africa and South/Central America. It’s the well-known story of how the developing world is… developing.

Billions of people are moving toward a higher standard of living. That requires oil.

That’s all for now. Tune in tomorrow for Part II of this discussion…

Byron King
Contributing Editor, Money Morning

Publisher’s Note: This article originally appeared in Daily Resource Hunter

From the Archives…

How You Can Use Small-Cap Stocks to Leverage Your Share Returns
7-12-2012 – Kris Sayce

How to Make Cash-Like Returns Using Shares
6-12-2012 – Kris Sayce

How Long Can the Market Ignore These ‘Warning Signs’?
5-12-2012 – Murray Dawes

Is There Any Good News to Come from the US Debt Crisis?
4-12-2012 – Dr. Alex Cowie

Buy Small Caps Now While Investors Are Crying
3-12-2012 – Dr. Alex Cowie

From the Port Phillip Publishing Library:

The Three Oil and Gas Stocks Making Money in a Market Crash

Time to Buy America

The U.S. is the place to be. That’s what everybody says. It has all the advantages: a stronger economy, a younger population, cheaper energy and a central bank ready to print money as necessary.

Look for U.S. manufacturing to get a boost, especially in industries such as chemicals, from new energy discoveries. Households should benefit from lower energy prices too. And the dollar should go up as foreigners move their money to America in search of safety and higher returns.

This from markets blog Business Insider:

We are seeing calls that, thanks to shale drilling, the U.S. is poised to become the world leader in oil production, leading some to begin invoking “Saudi America.”

Goldman Sachs analyst Kamakshya Trivedi, weighed in on the global macro implications of this phenomenon in a note titled: “The shale revolution is changing the global energy landscape.”

The note actually goes further, talking about how the entire economic landscape could potentially change.

The main impact, they write, is that oil prices will no longer prove a brake on growth:

…shifts in production are gradually loosening the oil price constraint that has been a persistent feature of the global economy. If global demand growth can recover, the risks that it will be choked off by rising oil prices are receding.

This will produce a knock-on effect for household incomes in the West, while blindsiding petro-states:

The drag on household incomes in the developed world from this source should end.

Meanwhile, central banks will be able to shift their focus from containing headline inflation:

Rising energy prices have affected core inflation measures to a degree, influencing the inflation outlook even for central banks, like the Federal Reserve, that have focused more on underlying inflation measures. As a result, lower ongoing energy inflation means that monetary policy may be easier on average than it otherwise would have been.

What? Fighting inflation? What central bank is worried about fighting inflation?

They’ve got ZIRP and QE to infinity. They seem to be trying to cause inflation, not fight it. These guys aren’t firefighters. They’re pyromaniacs. As credit expert Tony Boechk, who writes The Boeckh Investment Letter, puts it:

The magnitude of reflation efforts is without precedent.

Meanwhile, here’s Philip Stephens, writing in the Financial Times:

It’s time to buy America.

America’s military reach will be unrivalled for decades. It has a stable political system. The country’s demographic profile is significantly better than that of any potential rivals. […] The US has huge advantage in technological prowess and intellectual resources.

How about that, dear reader? Is it time to buy America?

Maybe not. The real effect of cheaper energy in the U.S. will be to allow policymakers to make a bigger mess of things. They’ll shift more of America’s real wealth to the zombies. They’ll go deeper into debt. They’ll print more money.

The Worst Kind of Luck

America got lucky. Its energy entrepreneurs found ways to squeeze oil and gas out of stone. Neat trick. But sometimes good luck is the worst kind of luck.

Atlanta would have been better off if the South had lost the war before Sherman approached. George A. Custer would have been better off if he’d gotten fired before taking his troops to the Little Big Horn. And the whole world would have been better off if Gavrilo Princip had not had the good luck to have a revolver in his hand when he ran into the Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria.

Putting that aside, one thing we notice immediately: Mr. Stephens seems to have no idea how markets work. Reading his description of America’s pluses, it looks like a time to sell the country, not buy it.

Stephens says the U.S. is leading in several important ways. But so what? What America is today must already be reflected in the prices of her stocks, bonds and real estate.

Future prices are tomorrow’s business. If the U.S. could surprise on the upside, it might be a good time to buy. If the surprise is more likely to come on the downside, it is better to sell.

It is like betting at a racetrack. The previous winner may hold his head high and prance around. He may be the favorite to win again. He may be at the peak of his career. But that is not usually a good time to bet on him.

Investors tend to over-value the recent past and forget the distant past. They like betting on yesterday’s winners. They run the odds up on the favorite until the payout for winning is small and the risk of loss is huge.

Out of Whack

That is why the yield on the 10-year T-note is so low – less than 1.6% last week. And that is why U.S. stocks are so expensive – about 32% above their historic average on a Shiller P/E basis (which uses the average inflation-adjusted earnings for the previous 10 years).

Black Tuesday Chart

Stocks and bonds have been in bull markets for the last 30 years. A generation of investors has grown up with no experience of anything else. As far as they know, stocks only go up. And on the rare occasions when they go down, the feds come in to push them back up again.

As for bonds, they’re a one-way bet too. Ben Bernanke has pledged to keep bond prices high for years into the future. If prices begin to fall (pushing up bond yields) he’ll come into the market to shore them up.

Of course, it’s been many years since we thought we could predict the future. A full head of hair and soothsaying both went away at about the same time.

What we try to do now is to wait for things to get so far out of whack that even a Fed governor has to work hard not to notice. Then we bet that they will get back into whack.

When? How? We don’t know. But right now, we see U.S. debt at levels that look out of whack to us. The feds are running real, unfunded deficits equal to 21 times the rate of GDP growth.

Where this will lead? We don’t know. But probably not to higher prices for America’s stocks and bonds.

P.S. Move Your Money out of Stocks — Right Now

A coordinated “economic suicide bomb” attack on the stock market could begin on Dec. 31, 2012, according to findings by the economic research team at the Insiders Strategy Group.

If you have money in the stock market, you must remove a large chunk — if not all — of it as soon as possible.

In this letter, I’ll show you 27 alternative investments that are poised to profit — even as the stock market collapses.

Other Related Articles:

Article brought to you by Inside Investing Daily. Republish without charge. Required: Author attribution, links back to original content or www.insideinvestingdaily.com. Any investment contains risk. Please see our disclaimer.