Market Review 27.11.12

Source: ForexYard

printprofile

The marketplace saw moderate risk taking during Asian trading last night, after euro-zone finance ministers agreed to terms for providing Greece with a new round of bailout funds.

The price of crude oil advanced close to $0.40 a barrel, eventually reaching as high as $88.10, before dropping to its current level of $87.95.

The EUR/USD gained around 20 pips to trade as high as 1.2993, before giving up virtually all of its gains during early morning trading.

Gold prices saw very little movement in overnight trading, and remain within reach of the psychologically significant $1750 an ounce level.

Main News for Today

US Core Durable Goods Orders- 13:30 GMT
• Forecasted to come in at -0.6%, significantly below last month’s 2.0%
• Any disappointing data could result in the USD/JPY taking losses during afternoon trading

US CB Consumer Confidence- 15:00 GMT
• Forecasted to come in slightly higher than last month’s figure
• Better than expected news could result in risk taking, which may lead to gains for crude oil during the second half of the day

Read more forex news on our forex blog

Forex Market Analysis provided by ForexYard.

© 2006 by FxYard Ltd

Disclaimer: Trading Foreign Exchange carries a high level of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. There is a possibility that you could sustain a loss of all of your investment and therefore you should not invest money that you cannot afford to lose. You should be aware of all the risks associated with Foreign Exchange trading.

ECB May Be Considering to Help Greece

By TraderVox.com

Tradervox.com (Dublin) – According to three euro area officials who asked for anonymity, the European Central Bank is considering new measures to help Greece reduce its funding gap through the use of Greek debt in its investment portfolios. The ECB has Greek bonds in its investment portfolios and had agreed in February to give any profits back to Greece. This issue has been revisited, with ECB suggesting options including rolling over the holdings or allowing the Greek Government to buy them back.

According to one of the officials, the ECB has over 10 billion euros in the portfolios. But the amount saved by Greece would be considerable less than the overall value of the holdings. The euro zone finance ministers were meeting in Brussels yesterday where they agreed to help Greece by allowing the bailout money. The impasse had prevented the next bailout from being paid to the country despite Greek parliament passing austerity measures. Greece requires as much as 32.6 billion euros in extra financing through 2016. According to creditors’ assessment of the Greek issue, allowing Greece two more years would open up financing gaps of 15 billion euros through 2014 and 17.6 billion euros in 2015-2016.

The considerations of debt rollovers or buybacks would lead to controversy as they would open the ECB to accusations of monetary state financing. Bundesbank, Germany’s central bank, has already voiced its opposition to such a move by the region’s central bank, opposing the current bond-buying program as it poses dangers to the banks credibility and independence. Economists who have talked about the issue have indicated that the rollover would give remedy to the immediate Greece funding requirements, while a buyback would force the government to pay ECB the amount it paid for the bonds, which is less than the face value.

If the Greek government is able to close the funding gap to meet the terms of its bailout, it would receive the next tranche of funds which would allow the ECB to accept Greek government bonds as collateral.

Disclaimer
Tradervox.com is not giving advice nor is qualified or licensed to provide financial advice. You must seek guidance from your personal advisors before acting on this information. While we try to ensure that all of the information provided on this website is kept up-to-date and accurate we accept no responsibility for any use made of the information provided. Opinions expressed at Tradervox.com are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Tradervox.com or its management. 

Article provided by TraderVox.com
Tradervox.com is a Forex News Portal that provides real-time news and analysis relating to the Currency Markets.
News and analysis are produced throughout the day by our in-house staff.
Follow us on twitter: www.twitter.com/tradervox

Natural Gas to Rule the World

By MoneyMorning.com.au

Back in the swinging sixties, Liza Minelli famously sang, ‘money makes the world go round’.

She had it all wrong. It’s not money – it’s cheap energy that makes the world go round.

Cheap energy means cheap transport, cheap manufacturing, and cheap food – all of which translate to higher living standards.

In fact, this makes cheap energy important enough for a nation to fight for.

So when oil started to get harder to find in the US in the middle of the twentieth century, they started a sixty-year long campaign to dominate the Middle East and secure its energy.

This has caused most of the major conflicts in the region in the last half century. But maybe, finally, the worst is behind us…

The Shale Gas Revolution in America

You may have heard of the US shale gas revolution.

Shale gas production employs a drilling technique that gives drillers access to previously inaccessible energy sources.

In under ten years, shale gas has gone from nowhere… to comprising a third of the US natural gas market.

In fact it has been so successful that the price of US natural gas has fallen out of bed and into the basement, from $15 to less than $4.

75% Fall in the Natural Gas Price in Seven Years

75% Fall in the Natural  Gas Price in Seven Years

Source: StockCharts

The monumental effects of this will take years to filter through.

For one thing, it’s creating a tidal wave of employment in the US industry at a time when jobs are hard to come by. A cheap source of energy could also make US manufacturing more competitive once again.

And the impacts of this cheap energy will spread globally as well.

For one thing, the US will gradually stop beating up the Middle East for their energy, as it becomes less dependent on this source. (Although the US-Israeli relationship means peace in the Middle East is still a distant dream.)

Another important effect will be a drop in price for other energy sources, like coal and uranium, as natural gas displaces them.

To start with, many hydrocarbon fuelled power stations in the US have already switched from coal to natural gas over the last two years.

Now that natural gas costs are down 75%, and likely to stay down, it made sense to switch the power stations over to gas. Natural gas is an environmentally friendlier fossil fuel too, so it means less pollution compared to coal.

You can see the effect on the US power mix in this chart. In under two years, use of natural gas as an energy source has almost doubled from providing 70 million Megawatt/hours – to 130 million Megawatt/hours.

It’s suddenly very close to being the US’s dominant source of electricity:

The United States – Cooking on Gas

The United States - Cooking on Gas

Source: soberlook

This is a phenomenal change in a short period, and is great for the US.

Coal and Uranium Getting Kicked in the Guts by Gas

However the change in the status quo is having all sort of knock on effects elsewhere.

For one thing, the switch to natural gas is creating a coal surplus which is hitting the seaborne markets.

This is part of the reason that the price of coal from Newcastle has fallen from around $120 this time two years ago, to recently plunge under $80 / tonne.

At a time that lower Chinese demand is having an effect as well, the US switch to natural gas isn’t helping the Australian coal industry.

You wonder if Treasurer Wayne Swan included that in his calculations for the mineral resource rent tax, or his budget projections…

And with the US sitting on at least a century of shale gas, this is not a market driver that will pass quickly.

Uranium has been in the dog house since the Japanese earthquake and nuclear power accident at Fukushima.

The uranium spot price had been holding well around $52 / lb for a year or so.

But six months ago it cracked.

And since then, spot uranium has plummeted as low as $40 / lb.

The uranium spot market is only a short term indicator for uranium, as most is traded through long term contracts. But all the same, it’s a good bellwether for what’s going on.

And right now, it’s looking pretty bleak. Part of this is due to the Japanese government turning increasingly against nuclear power.

But I think cheap natural gas as a competitive source of power in the US (a major uranium user) is also part of the picture.

The chart above shows a very slight pullback in nuclear power production this year.

If this is the start of the same trend we saw for coal, then it’s another kick in the guts for uranium.

This is all bad for the status quo, but great for the industries leveraged to the new guard. So it’s essential for investors to stay up with the story.

Dr Alex Cowie
Editor, Diggers & Drillers

PS. Leverage is a great way to boost your returns. You can either use margin lending to trade big blue-chip shares, or you can use the method I prefer – buying and selling small-cap stocks for big gains. It’s also a method favoured by your regular editor, Kris Sayce. Keep an eye on your inbox later this week for a notice from Kris about the greatest Australian you’ve never heard of, and how he used risk and leverage to create enormous wealth…

From the Port Phillip Publishing Library

Special Report:
Retire Rich, Happy and Free From Money Worries

Daily Reckoning:
The Aussie Dollar Dilemma

Money Morning:
Will Australian Banking Scandals Rock the Economy in 2013?

Pursuit of Happiness:
Revealed: The UN to Watch Over You on the Internet

Diggers and Drillers:
Why Shale Gas Could Be Your Investment of the Decade


Natural Gas to Rule the World

The Ongoing Energy Revolution

By MoneyMorning.com.au

My goal is to give you the best perspective that I can offer in the arena of energy and mineral resources.

In that spirit, let’s start by looking at the Middle East, which remains a political mess. Hey, what else is new, right? Still, some times are messier than others. Some times offer more opportunity than others.

We’ll start with the big picture. The Middle East mess affects all manner of scenarios for future price and availability of oil in the world.

It Isn’t 1973 Anymore

Right now, headlines from the Middle East describe the battle between Israel and Hamas in and around the Gaza Strip. It’s quite a display of ordnance. In the first four days of conflict, Hamas has fired nearly 1,000 missiles at Israel – that’s 250 per day, over 10 per hour.

In fact, that’s more missiles than the Germans fired at London in all of 1944-45. Most of the Hamas missiles were manufactured in Iran and smuggled into Gaza over the past few years.

Against this steel rain, Israel has employed a remarkable anti-missile system called ‘Iron Dome’. Basically, Israeli radars pick up Hamas missiles in flight and plot the course and trajectory. If a missile looks like it’ll hit an uninhabited area, the Israelis just let it fly to impact. So what if there’s a hole in the ground, right?

But if a Hamas missile is headed for a populated area, then the Israelis fire a low-cost (about $50,000) interceptor to kill it. The idea is that $50,000 is ‘cheap’ compared with the damage a missile hit could cause, including injuries and deaths.

So far, the Israelis have shot down about 90% of Hamas missiles that could’ve harmed people and/or other high-value assets. Nice shooting, and there are several angles to consider:

  • Routinely knocking down the Iranian/Hamas missile barrage is an astonishing feat of technology, which sends a message to governments around the world. That is, missile defense actually works. An entire global aspect of operational war-fighting art is now being rendered impotent. Who knew? (Well, some of us knew.)
  • By lessening the direct threat to civilians, Israeli policymakers buy time and flexibility to pursue a broad spectrum of responses. On the one hand, there’s no internal pressure within Israel to “make peace” and stop the rockets. At the same time, there’s less popular pressure for the Israelis to roll tanks and ‘invade’ Gaza
  • Every Hamas rocket launch fixes a set of coordinates for Israeli military intelligence, which in turn rapidly targets that site. The Israelis employ smart-bombs in reply, which destroy Hamas launch systems while minimizing nearby civilian casualties. It’s a true ‘revolution in military affairs’ in action
  • Over time, Hamas is running out of missiles, while not achieving its military or political goals. Plus, in return, Hamas is getting its people and assets blown up. At most other times or eras in human history, that would’ve been known as ‘losing the war’. Will the global media bother to explain that?
  • Through the success of Iron Dome, a small, localized military engagement remains… small. And localized. Indeed, in terms of casualties, more people have died in motor accidents in, say, Europe, in the past week, than in the Israel-Hamas conflict.

As events unfold, other players have chimed in with standard, reflexive anti-Israel, anti-U.S. rhetoric. Neighboring Egypt, for example, is incensed about the conflict, if not very incensed. But not incensed enough to, say, annex Gaza to Egypt and offer citizenship and state-level protection to the people who live in that idyllic garden spot. No way.

Elsewhere in the Middle East, a spokesman for the Iraqi government expressed the idea of Arabs ‘embargoing’ oil exports to the U.S., as punishment for the U.S. ‘support’ of Israel. Of course, the Iraqis haven’t rejected the $4 billion per month of U.S. ‘aid’ that still flows to that country. (Oh, you thought that the expense of the Iraqi war was over?)

Basically, the Israeli ordnance exchange with Hamas has generated plenty of outside blah, blah, blah. Shades of 1973? No, it’s not 1973. It’s a different world. The only gas lines in the U.S. are due to Hurricane Sandy, and not to another Arab-Israeli war.

Payback and Blowback

To the north of Israel, there’s an ongoing civil war in Syria. This one is far more deadly than the Israel-Hamas exchange, with close-in combat all around. It’s a bloody, regional version of the ‘Oil War’ scenario that we’ve advanced over the years. Basically, Shiite Muslims are fighting with Sunni Muslims, settling a score that goes back about 1,300 years.

The fighting in Syria has more or less moved to the inner pages of newspapers, and away from network news. Still, every now and again, something interesting trickles out.

For example, a Turkish military helicopter crashed in Pervari, in Siirt province of southeast Turkey, near the Syrian border, killing 17 soldiers and aircrew. The official version is that the helicopter went down due to ‘bad weather’.

Oh, really? Another way of explaining the crash is ‘surface to air missiles’ (SAMs). That is, according to Russian and Israeli accounts, the Syrian government had something to do with that Turkish helicopter going down.

The backstory is that the Syrian government is perturbed that its ‘rebels’ have acquired SAMs from outside interests (guess who) via Turkish routes. In the past couple of months, rebels have shot down Syrian aircraft. Thus, there’s now payback against the Turks from Syria. It’s a tit for tat using SAMs.

Where is this all headed? Well, as they taught us back at the Naval War College, conflict is what often brings clarity to human struggle. Carl von Clausweitz stated it in his own, inimitable way, in his great book On War: ‘The maximum use of force is in no way incompatible with the simultaneous use of the intellect.’

The Energy Revolution

Just as Israel’s Iron Dome is knocking Hamas missiles out of the sky, revolutionizing military operations and changing political equations on the ground, so is other technology revolutionizing the world of energy.

Recently, the International Energy Agency (IEA) released a report stating that North America leads a ‘sweeping transformation’ in global oil and gas production, based on the fracking boom that we’ve discussed so often here.

In addition to new ‘supply-side’ techniques, in the area of drilling and production, the IEA report focused on how the technology-driven energy revolution is accompanied by a ‘similarly transformative shift’ in global energy efficiency. Indeed, efficiency has a critical role to play going forward.

According to IEA executive director Maria van der Hoeven:

‘By 2035, we can achieve energy savings equivalent to nearly a fifth of global demand in 2010. In other words, energy efficiency is just as important as unconstrained energy supply, and increased action on efficiency can serve as a unifying energy policy that brings multiple benefits.’ (Emphasis added.)

According to the IEA, extraordinary growth in oil and natural gas output in the US will cause an upheaval in global energy flows. One section of the IEA report dealt with new policy scenarios, specifically how the US could become a net exporter of natural gas by 2020.

Overall, per IEA estimates, the US could become net-energy self-sufficient by 2035 – but to be realistic, it assumes an almost explosive growth in non-fossil fuel energy supply (meaning solar and windmills).

Furthermore, according to the IEA, North America is emerging as a net oil exporter, based on growing output from Canada’s oil sands.

North American oil exports will accelerate an ongoing massive switch in the direction of international oil trade. That is, by 2035, almost 90% of Middle East oil exports will sail toward Asia, where China and India will account for 60% of future global energy demand growth. In that regard, the Middle East will become somebody else’s problem.

Not a moment too soon, some might say.

Byron King
Contributing Editor, Money Morning

Publisher’s Note: This article originally appeared in Daily Resource Hunter

From the Archives…

Why You Should Always Be Looking to Buy Small Cap Stocks
23-11-2012 – Kris Sayce

China is Now the World’s Biggest Gold Producer – and Consumer
22-11-2012 – Dominic Frisby

The Stock Market Gets Squeezed
21-11-2012 – Murray Dawes

Buy Quality Gold Stocks That Have the ‘Right Stuff’
20-11-2012 – Dr. Alex Cowie

Picking the Hot Commodity Stocks of 2013
19-11-2012 – Dr. Alex Cowie


The Ongoing Energy Revolution

USDCAD stays below a downward trend line

USDCAD stays below a downward trend line on 4-hour chart, and remains in downtrend from 1.0055. As long as the trend line resistance holds, the downtrend could be expected to continue, and further decline to test 0.9874 support could be seen. On the upside, a clear break above the trend line resistance will suggest that a cycle bottom has been formed at 0.9914, then the following upward movement could bring price back towards 1.0055 previous high.

usdcad

Forex Signals

The Little Book of Stock Market Cycles

By The Sizemore Letter


“There is no magic formula to make trading or investing easy,” starts Jeffrey Hirsch in The Little Book of Stock Market Cycles.  “Nothing can replace research, experience, and a healthy dose of luck.”

History, however, can be a useful guide in understanding the environment in which you are investing.  This is the focus of Mr. Hirsch’s latest installment in the Little Books series.  Hirsch is the Editor in Chief of the Stock Trader’s Almanac and an authority on stock market cycles and seasonal patterns.

Cycle research is dismissed in some investing circles as “voodoo,” but Hirsch makes a compelling defense of the discipline throughout the book and explains it with clarity:  “Recurring events such as the presidential election every four years, end-of-quarter portfolio rebalancing, options and futures expirations, tax deadlines, and holidays have a predictable influence on traders and investors.”

Indeed, all of these predictable events affect flows into and out of the stock market, as do many, many others detailed by Hirsch.

Hirsch starts his book with a description of secular bull and bear markets.  For the uninitiated in market terminology, “secular” means long-term in this case.  Secular markets tend to last 8 to 20 years, and recent history has been no exception.  The last secular bull market lasted 18 years, from 1982 to 2000.  The secular bear that followed started in 2000 and still persists 12 years later.

Within a secular bull or bear market, there are smaller and shorter cyclical bull and bear markets that can last anywhere from a couple months to several years.

It is somewhat controversial to consider the 2003-2007 bull market—which peaked with a new all-time high—as a “cyclical” bull market, but I consider that a fair description given that price / earnings multiples contracted throughout the period and that it ending with one of the worst cyclical bear markets in history in 2008.  This was also the view of John Mauldin, whose Little Book of Bull’s Eye Investing we covered in a separate book review.

Though most of Hirsch’s work is empirically sound, he falls into the mental trap of confirmation bias on a few occasions and tries to fit the data to his thesis rather than shape his thesis around the data.  This was certainly the case when he contends that “a new secular bull will not emerge and lasting prosperity will not take charge until there is an extended period of relative peace.”

Why? Because “the single most important enduring influence on the stock market is war.”

Hirsch states that the stock market has never made significant headway when the United States was involved in a major war.  The problem with this argument is that there have only been a small handful of wars in modern U.S. history and certainly not enough to reasonably draw conclusions.

But more than that, the statement is just flat-out not true, at least not unless you ignore the Korean War (perhaps it was called the “Forgotten War” for a reason).  Stocks soared throughout the Korean War, as the 1950s were one of the best decades in market history.

That Kirsch considers the Iraq and Afghanistan campaigns “major wars” and Korea—where U.S. involvement lasted longer than World War I and where 36,500 Americans died—not, is a fatal flaw in his argument on the role of wars on the stock market.

The war argument notwithstanding, I would agree with Kirsch when he asserts that “all of the previous secular bull trends were accompanied by a major paradigm shift from an enabling technology or cultural change.”

Disruptive technologies are essential to the process of creative destruction that is so important in driving the economy forward.  Kirsch believe that the next boom will be driven by alternative energy (as is already happening in the shale gas boom), biotechnology or perhaps some other “yet-to-be-discovered” field.

Kirsch sees the next secular bull market—which he believes will send the market 500 percent higher before it is finished—starting in 2017-2018.

Much of the book is a description of shorter-term market cycles and seasonal patterns.  Most readers will be familiar with the Presidential Cycle, but Kirsch takes the analysis several layers deeper, looking at month-by-month returns and dividing his analysis between elections with incumbents and elections without.  Even seasoned market technicians will find some new angles on this old standard.

Kirsch takes the “sell in May and go away” maxim several layers deeper as well.   Given the time of year, it is worth mentioning that November, December, and January are the three best consecutive months out of the year:  “If you were only to be invested for three months out of the year, these are the months.”

But if this period fails to deliver, watch out.  There are macro forces at work overpowering the cyclical forces, and it is a major red flag.

Kirsch also has a trading tip that might be a bit puzzling to non-Jewish “goy” investors: “Sell Rosh Hashanah, Buy Yom Kippur, Sell Passover.”

This is really just a slight variation to the standard seasonal advice of being invested from late October to April, as Yom Kippur falls in October and Passover falls in March or April.  But as Kirsch elaborates, “Perhaps it is Talmudic wisdom, but selling stocks before the eight-day span of the High Holidays [of Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur] has avoided many declines, especially during uncertain times like 2008.”

In any event, The Little Book of Stock Market Cycles is a nice primer on cycle research and an excellent starting point for further research.  Kirsch is not offering a magic solution that is “guaranteed” to improve your investment performance, and he would never claim to.  But he has given us an insightful collection of market observations and plenty of food for thought.  I recommend you add it to your winter reading list.

SUBSCRIBE to Sizemore Insights via e-mail today.

The post The Little Book of Stock Market Cycles appeared first on Sizemore Insights.

Related posts:

Canada’s Carney to become Bank of England governor

By Central Bank News
    The U.K. government has appointed Mark Carney, the highly-regarded governor of the Bank of Canada (BOC), as the next governor of the Bank of England (BOE), surprising commentators that had put their money on Paul Tucker to replace Sir Mervyn King on July 1, 2013.
    Tucker, deputy governor at the BOE, had topped the list of candidates to replace King, who retires after 10 years as governor, after Carney had said he would not be applying for the job.
    “Mark Carney is the outstanding candidate to be Governor of the Bank of England and help steer Britain through these difficult economic times. He is quite simply the best, most experienced and most qualified person in the world to do the job,” U.K. Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne said in a statement, adding Carney has indicated he intends to serve a five year term.
    Carney has headed the BOC since February 2008 and is also chairman of the Financial Stability Board (FSB), which monitors and promotes global financial regulation. Carney is familiar with the United Kingdom, having a masters and doctorate in economics from Oxford University and worked for Goldman Sachs in its London, Tokyo, New York and Toronto offices.
    As a Canadian, Carney is a subject of The Queen and the UK Treasury said he had indicated that he would apply for British citizenship. He is married to a British citizen.
    Carney said in a statement he was “honoured to accept this important and demanding role,” adding:
    “This is a critical time for the British, European and global economies; a decisive period for reform of the global financial system including its leading financial centre, the City of London; and a crucial point in the Bank of England’s history as it accepts vital new responsibilities.”

     Canada was one of the few countries that escaped the worst ravages of the global financial crises, mainly due to tighter banking regulation that limited the exposure of Canada’s banks to property. The country’s economy has bounced back strongly after 2009, expanding 3.2 percent in 2010 and 2.4 percent in 2011 compared with anaemic UK growth of 1.8 percent in 2010 and 0.8 percent in 2011.

    “He has done a brilliant job for the Canadian economy as its central bank Governor, avoiding big bail outs and securing growth,” Osborne said.
    Carney’s experience at the FSB was also a draw for the UK as the Bank of England is set to be put back in charge of financial stability and banking regulation next year.
    “Mark Carney is the perfect candidate to take charge of the Bank as it takes on these vital new responsibilities. He will bring strong leadership and a fresh new perspective…We needed the best – and in Mark Carney we’ve got it,” Osborne said.
    The candidacy of Tucker, who has been with the BOE for 30 years and responsible for financial stability, was hurt after he was criticized for his failure to recognize that banks were rigging the LIBOR interest rate. Phone calls from 2008 showed that Tucker was in close contact with Barclays chief executive Bob Diamond who has resigned.
    In addition to Carney’s appointment, the UK Treasury said Charles Bean had been reappointed as deputy governor for monetary stability to help the BOE in its expanded role and the transition to Carney. Bean has asked to leave his job on June 30, 2014.
    The Bank of Canada’s board will shortly form a special committee with independent directors to look for a successor to Carney. Governors of the BOC are appointed by the independent directors, subject to approval by Canada’s government.

    www.CentralBankNews.info

Israel holds rate, no inflation pressure, growth moderate

By Central Bank News
    Israel’s central bank left its policy interest rate steady at 2.0 percent, saying inflationary pressures were not visible and the economy is expected to continue to expand moderately in coming months.
    The Bank of Israel (BOI), which last month cut its rates for the third time this year for a total reduction of 75 basis points, said “the level of economic risk from around the world remains high, and with it the concerns over negative effects on the local economy.”
    But data point to moderate economic improvement in U.S. and China in contrast to continued recession in Europe and a deterioration in Japan. Inflation worldwide continues to be low and commodity prices are expected to support the current level of inflation.
    The BOI said Israel’s Gross Domestic Product expanded by an annual 2.9 percent in the third quarter with private consumption up 3.5 percent and exports up 4.6 percent. But there was a decline of demand for consumer durables, machinery and equipment investment.

    Recent indicators are consistent with the central bank’s forecast of 3.3 percent growth this year and 3.0 percent in 2013 with surveys continuing to indicate pessimism and moderate economic activity.
   Israel’s inflation rate fell to 1.8 percent in October from 2.1 percent in September, in the midpoint of the bank’s 1-3 percent target range, and the bank said inflationary expectations for the next 12 months are also around that midpoint. The BOI forecast 2013 inflation of 2.2 percent.
    The decline in October inflation was due to a sharper drop in housing, fruit and vegetable prices, the bank said.

    www.CentralBankNews.info

s

Angola holds rate steady as inflation rises slightly

By Central Bank News
    The central bank of Angola kept its base rate (BNA) unchanged at 10.25 percent, noting the inflation rate had ticked up slightly in October while credit to the economy expanded by a monthly 1.94 percent for an increase of 19.45 percent since the start of the year.
    Banco Nacional de Angola has held its base rate steady all year and the inflation rate rose 0.91 percent in October from September for an annual rate of 9.76 percent, up from September’s rate of 9.65 percent, the lowest level this year.
    Reducing inflation to single digit levels has been an aim of the central bank for many years.
    In its statement, the banks said the rise in inflation was due to higher prices of housing, water, and electricity gas & fuel, food, alcohol and tobacco.
    Interest rates had remained stable throughout the month with the LUIBOR overnight at 5.56 percent while the average exchange rate of the kwanza against the U.S. dollar was 95.47 end-October compared with 95.42 at the end of September.
    Local currency credit accounts for 56 percent of total credit to Angola’s economy, the bank added.

    www.CentralBankNews.info

   

Central Bank News Link List – Nov 26, 2012: Bank of England set to name new governor at 1030 EST

By Central Bank News
Here’s today’s Central Bank News link list, click through if you missed the previous link list. The list comprises news about central banks that is not covered by Central Bank News. The list is updated during the day with the latest developments so readers don’t miss any important news.)