Why China’s Monetary Policy is Bad News For Australian Resource Stocks

By MoneyMorning.com.au

This news is ominous for Aussie miners and their supporting industries. And they know it. Already, news of cancelled investment projects are filtering through. A mining industry that stops building new mines is, well, toast.

The latest development is that investors, including companies, have been pulling their money out of China.

The Wall Street Journal has figured out what that’s doing to the Chinese economy:


‘Massive inflows of capital were a key factor behind China’s runaway bank lending, rising asset prices and yuan appreciation. Now, money is flowing in the other direction, contributing to falling prices for everything from real estate to equities and China’s currency.’

But there is a bigger effect. When investors’ money was flowing in, it forced the Chinese to have loose monetary policy to keep their exchange rate peg.

Now that the money is flowing out, China’s monetary policy will, by default, tighten. That means less demand for Australian resources. The faster half of the Australian two speed economy will become the caboose. Resource stocks will tank.

If we’re right, spare a moment of sympathy for Calvin Sheng, who ‘recently shelled out 2.5 million yuan for an apartment in Melbourne, Australia. “I just went to the bank, bought the Australian dollars I needed for the down payment and transferred the funds to Australia,” said Mr. Sheng. “I am going there to study, and you can see it as a balanced investment, in case there is any economic downturn risk in China.”‘ Calvin is trying to hedge a Chinese slowdown by buying a house in Melbourne. Oh boy.

It’s likely the Chinese will revalue their currency downwards in an attempt to stimulate growth. That move would be another salvo fired in the ongoing currency wars. Sound Money. Sound Investments editor Greg Canavan recently hosted the world’s top authority on the subject.

James Rickards told a Sydney audience about his views on what happens next for global currencies, including the Australian dollar.

The recorded speech and questions will soon be made available to subscribers of our paid publications.

Nick Hubble
Editor, Money Morning

Related Articles

Market Pullback Exposes Five Stocks to Buy

There is No Safe Haven – But You Should Still Own Gold

This Three-Legged Investment Market is About to Get Wobbly


Why China’s Monetary Policy is Bad News For Australian Resource Stocks

Why Gold Mining Companies Just Might Take Off

By MoneyMorning.com.au

Changes are afoot in the gold mining sector

Gold has had a quiet year.

Despite the prospect of more money printing by the world’s central banks, and minuscule interest rates, it seems that not many people see inflation as a big threat at the moment.

But things can change quickly in the financial world. Often the best time to buy things is when nobody really wants them. It’s interesting that renowned investors George Soros and John Paulson have been buying gold recently.

It looks a smart move to us. Gold is worth holding, if only as a form of insurance against paper money going bad – which it eventually will, if all the printing continues. We certainly see no reason to hold low-yielding government bonds.

But what about gold mining stocks? If you believe that you should own gold and that it will go up in price, surely gold stocks are a good investment?

Large Gold Mining Companies
Have Disappointed So Far

The logic behind owning the shares of gold mining companies seems quite sensible. By having a slice of the company’s gold in the ground you should benefit from leverage.

By this, I mean that a rise in the gold price – other things being equal – should lead to a bigger proportional rise in the profits of the gold mine. Of course, the same leverage works in reverse when gold prices fall, which makes owning gold stocks a riskier proposition for an investor than owning the metal itself.

HUI index of gold mining stocks

Source: Bloomberg


But the relationship between gold prices and the price of gold stocks has broken down sharply this year. Have a look at the chart above. It tracks the spot price of gold (yellow line) with the HUI index of gold mining stocks (white line) during the last year. It contains a lot of the major players.

The HUI index includes gold mining companies that do not hedge the price of their gold production beyond 18 months. This means that these companies should see their revenues closely correlated to changes in the price of gold.

Yet as you can see, during the last six months, gold stocks have significantly underperformed against the price of gold bullion. But even over a longer period of time, a broad index of gold stocks like the HUI has done worse than bullion.

It’s Been Better to Own Physical Gold

During the last ten years, the HUI index has gone from 120.8 to 424.3 – an increase of just over 250%. Now that’s pretty good, and a lot better than having your money in most stock market funds.

But the price of gold has risen from $308 to $1,604 per troy ounce – an increase of 420%. There have been brief periods when gold stocks have performed better than gold, but it doesn’t look like the leverage theory has worked out in practice. Why?

There are several reasons. One is the fact that gold mining companies used to hedge their production by getting another party – typically a bank – to buy their output at a guaranteed price.

Scarred by years of low and lacklustre gold prices, they wanted some security for their efforts. As the price of gold surged, many companies lost out on big profits because they had already agreed to sell their output for much lower prices.

Now, of course, hedging is virtually non-existent among most major gold mining companies. But the other big problem they’ve now encountered is cost. It’s costing a lot more money for mining companies to get their gold out of the ground. Cash costs have soared due to high energy prices and the cost of specialised workers.

This has meant that profits have actually been going down at a lot of gold mining companies. It’s quite ironic that gold companies that have been seen as beneficiaries of inflation have now become victims of it.

Then there’s the growth in exchange traded funds (ETFs), which have made it a lot easier for investors to own physical gold. Some investors have also bought gold royalty companies.

These companies finance gold mining companies and get a share of their production revenues (a royalty) in return. This means their profits are linked to the price of gold, but are not dragged by cost inflation. As a result their shares have done well, leaving them trading on punchy multiples of expected profits.

Will Gold Mining Companies Live Up to Their Promise?

You could say that if gold stocks haven’t done what they should have done, then why bother with them?

Well, some interesting changes are afoot in the sector. And when gold sees a renewed surge of interest – as we expect it will – neglected gold stocks could benefit.

With the rest of the mining sector being hit by the slowdown in demand for industrial metals, you also have to wonder how much longer rampant cost inflation will be hurting gold miners. If other big players are cutting back on projects, then the pressure driving up the costs of staff and machinery will ease off.

But there’s one other major driver that could ignite the sector – and that’s takeover activity. The big question is: if the gold assets of these gold mining companies are genuinely cheap, then why haven’t they been bought by corporate buyers?

Well, now it looks as though they might be.

Phil Oakley
Contributing Editor, Money Morning

Publisher’s Note: This is an edited version of an article that first appeared in MoneyWeek (UK).

From the Archives…

Trusted With Trillions, Bankers Can’t Even Work Out a Two Dollar Puzzle
10-08-2012 – Kris Sayce

What This ‘Junk’ Tells You about Stock Prices
09-08-2012 – Kris Sayce

How to Defeat Your Worst Enemy in Investing: Yourself
08-08-2012 – John Stepek

The Mining Boom is Over
07-08-2012 – Dan Denning

Why the Doc Should Have Flown Further West
06-08-2012 – Kris Sayce


Why Gold Mining Companies Just Might Take Off

USDCAD’s downward movement extends to 0.9859

USDCAD’s downward movement from 1.0083 extends to as low as 0.9859. Resistance is now at 0.9930, as long as this level holds, the downtrend could be expected to continue, and next target would be at 0.9800 area. On the other side, a break above 0.9930 will suggest that a cycle bottom is being formed on 4-hour chart, then consolidation of the downtrend could be seen to follow, and the trading range would be between 0.9800 and 0.9950.

usdcad

Forex Signals

Chile keeps rate steady, economy better than forecast

By Central Bank News

    The central bank of Chile kept its interest rate unchanged at 5.0 percent, as widely expected, and said domestic economic activity and demand was better than it forecast in June due to strong inventory stocking and consumption.
    Banco Central de Chile said international financial conditions had improved and strains in the euro zone had eased slightly.
   “However, uncertainty remains, the risk premium in some European economies remain very high and can not rule out a resurgence of these tensions in the coming months,” the bank said in a statement following a meeting of its council. It added that growth was still weak in advanced economies and emerging markets had slowed more than expected.  
    The central bank noted that the “peso has appreciated” but it did not elaborate further.
    The bank has kept it’s policy rate, known as TPM, unchanged since January when it cut the rate by 25 basis points.

    The bank said inflation remains under 3 percent – the central bank targets inflation of 3 percent plus or minus one percentage point – and volatile energy and food prices had a negative effect on consumer prices in recent months. This could, however, also reverse.
    “Inflation expectations in the policy horizon remain around the target,” the bank said.
    In July Chile’s inflation rate was 2.5 percent while GDP expanded by 1.4 percent in the first quarter for an annual growth rate of 5.6 percent.
    Financial markets were on the lookout for any mention by the central bank of the peso currency, which is one of the strongest performing currencies worldwide.
    Some exporters, including fruit exporters, have expressed concern that the strength of the peso was making exports difficult. Chile is also the world’s largest copper producer.
    The central bank intervened in January last year when the peso was above 465 to the U.S. dollar. It was trading above above 483 today.

    www.CentralBankNews.info


    

   


Trading Psychology: Don’t Trade With Your Ego

Elliott Wave Junctures editor Jeffrey Kennedy talks about “the elephant in the room” that no trader can ignore.

By Elliott Wave International

Senior Analyst Jeffrey Kennedy is a busy man. Along with his regular duties at Elliott Wave International, he prepares 3-5 video lessons each week that teach technical traders how to anticipate — and act on — trading opportunities.

Subscribers say that what sets Jeffrey’s educational service apart is his unique ability to combine easy-to-understand, actionable advice along with a no-nonsense, uncensored look at trading psychology.

Of course, Elliott Wave Junctures is full of useful charts and technical tips. Yet some of Jeffrey’s most priceless content is his straightforward discussion of the problems that most traders face — but few experts talk about.

When I asked Jeffrey about one such lesson that resonated with his subscribers (we call it his “Patience and Persistence” episode), here’s what he said:

I think that hit home because it was honest — someone is finally talking about the elephant in the room.

Patience. Because of modern society, everything is “instant gratification.” Mobile communication, fast food, you name it. Whenever you’re counting waves, there’s a tendency to rush the wave count. It’s something that you’ll always have to be on guard against. That’s why I insist on confirming price action. When the pattern is indeed done, it will tell you it’s done. When you’re not patient, you tend to want to pick tops and bottoms.

Persistence: Just because things don’t unfold exactly the way you want doesn’t mean you’re wrong. If you ask for a raise, and you only get 60% of what you asked for, that’s not a failure. What’s important is the movement; the general trend; your overall assessment of motive wave vs. corrective wave.

Being able to top-tick or bottom-tick the market is ego trading, and it’ll cost you.

In my mind, there’s nothing in the world that’s worth anything that doesn’t take a little bit of patience and persistence to achieve. A relationship, an education or career, a healthy body: how do you get these things? You keep working at it; you keep showing up every day.

 

14 Critical Lessons Every Trader Should Know

Learn about managing your emotions, developing your trading methodology, and the importance of discipline in your trading decisions in The Best of Trader’s Classroom, a FREE 45-page eBook from Elliott Wave International.

Since 1999, Jeffrey Kennedy has produced dozens of Trader’s Classroom lessons exclusively for his subscribers. Now you can get “the best of the best” in these 14 lessons that offer the most critical information every trader should know.

Find out why traders fail, the three phases of a trader’s education, and how to make yourself a better trader with lessons on the Wave Principle, bar patterns, Fibonacci sequences, and more!

Don’t miss your chance to improve your trading. Download your FREE eBook today >>

 

This article was syndicated by Elliott Wave International and was originally published under the headline Trading Psychology: Don’t Trade With Your Ego. EWI is the world’s largest market forecasting firm. Its staff of full-time analysts led by Chartered Market Technician Robert Prechter provides 24-hour-a-day market analysis to institutional and private investors around the world.

 

 

Marvell Technology (MRVL) and the Next Generation of Wi-Fi

Article by Investment U

Nowadays, many of us have internet-connected devices in almost every room. Sometimes more than one.

At any given moment mom, dad and the kids may be streaming movies through game consoles, shopping on Amazon (Nasdaq: AMZN) on their smart phones and reading the latest stock market moves on their tablets, all at the same time.

This stresses our current wireless network systems, and many aren’t producing fast enough speeds for our growing electronic demand.

But have no fear…

Starting next year, wireless networks will have a new standard called 802.11ad that will support a 60 GHz band. This will allow wireless networks to run a great deal faster than those that run on today’s 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands.

To draw comparisons, today’s 5 GHz Wi-Fi can work as fast as 600 megabits per second, while the new standard will support speeds up to 7 gigabits per second.

However, this new, faster band standard doesn’t mean jack if you don’t have products to support it.

“Peanut Butter and Jelly”

That’s where Marvell Technology (Nasdaq: MRVL) and its recent partnership with Israeli-based start-up Wilocity come into play.

Their partnership makes as much sense as peanut butter and jelly. Wilocity is the leading developer of 60 GHz multi-gigabit wireless chipsets. And Marvell produces market-leading Avastar devices; these are the physical routers we see in many homes and offices today.

Together they’ll create tri-brand solutions enabled with the new 802.11ad standard. And they’re among four other companies currently in the process of bringing these products to market.

These new Wi-Fi routers will create a platform where multiple devices can stream live content at the same time, with extremely faster speeds and fewer glitches.

Since it takes a year on average for Silicon Valley to get new products into motion, we’re looking for new Wi-Fi routers to hit the shelves around 2014. And when they do, expect Marvell’s bottom line to get a big boost.

But let’s take a look at things right now…

Priced to Sell

When you break down some of Marvell’s financials, there are a few statistics that scream “bargain.”

Marvell’s most recent quarterly earnings and revenue growth are nothing to smile about, considering both were negative. And the stock has taken a considerable fall of 36% this year since its high of $18.86 back on February 3. Today it’s trading in the $12 range.

Marvell Technology and the Next Generation of Wi-Fi

But when you look at the fact that they have zero debt, trade at a P/E of 12.69 (well below the industry average of 33.11) and sport healthy profit margins of 16.62% (almost 5% higher than the industry average), the picture starts to brighten.

Marvell’s P/E is very attractive, but the ratio only values their underlying equity. It’s also nice to know the company has one of the industry’s lowest EV/EBITDA ratios.

EV/EBITDA stands for “Enterprise Value to Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization,” and it’s a measure merger analysts often use to value a firm since it also accounts for debt and cash holdings in a company’s valuation.

Marvell’s EV/EBITDA is an attractive 6.49 – almost half the industry average of 12.

And this is no surprise, considering Marvell has over $2 billion in cash sitting on its balance sheet and no debt.

Essentially a low EV/EBITDA means the company is at an attractive takeover price. Since Marvell is valued around $7 billion, we don’t expect the company to be taken over soon – there are only so many companies that could afford such an expenditure. However, a bargain is a bargain, and investors should take note.

Oh, and did we mention famed hedge fund manager David Einhorn is bullish on Marvell? According to its latest 13-F filing, Einhorn’s fund – Greenlight Capital – has 2.87% ownership of the company. And Marvell is one of the fund’s top five holdings, representing more than 5% of the fund as of March 31.

So with all the metrics covered, Marvell’s value ratios appear to be emphasizing that the company is currently sitting on the bargain rack. And with new cutting edge Wi-Fi routers in the works to hit shelves in 2014, future sales look bright, too.

Good Investing,

Ryan Fitzwater

Article by Investment U

How to Be a Better Golfer and Achieve Financial Independence

Article by Investment U

Bob Toski’s classic book, The Touch System for Better Golf, could make you rich. But for those of you who haven’t read it yet, I’m happy to give you the gist of it and how it can set you on the path to financial independence…

As a senior in high school, I was captain of my golf team. I had a great short game. My iron shots were pretty good, too. The problem was my driver. Oh, I hit a long way. But too often the ball ended up beyond the white stakes or deep in the elephant grass.

That changed after I read Bob Toski’s book. Toski pointed out that most golfers get on the tee, aim down the middle, and then try to hit the ball as far as they can.

Big mistake. The driver is just like any other club, Toski insisted. You need to aim for a target. You can’t just point it down the middle. You need to select an exact spot in the fairway and hit to it. When you do, you quit jumping out of your shoes and swing more smoothly. Your driving accuracy – and distance – improves immediately, just by having a definite target in mind.

What does golf have to do with achieving financial independence? Everything, really…

How Golf and Financial Independence Go Hand-in-Hand

In my former life as a money manager, I would ask prospective clients what they were trying to achieve with their investment portfolios.

“Well, I’m trying to make a lot of money,” was the typical reply.

“By what date?” I asked.

“The sooner the better.”

There’s an old saying: If you don’t know where you’re going, you’re not likely to get there. This is especially true in investing.

You need a definite goal (an exact spot in the fairway). Then you can put together a plan to achieve it.

“I’d like to be rich,” is not a goal.

“I’d like to have a $1 million net worth on my 65th birthday.” Now that’s a goal.

Once you have a goal, making a plan is easy. For instance, let’s say you are 25 years from retirement. How much do you need to save every month? Well, get out a financial calculator. (Or visit Investment U’s ROI calculator.) If you save $750 a month – and do no better than the stock market’s long-term annual return of 10% a year – you will have $1,003,418 in 25 years.

You want to have $3 million when you retire? Increase your savings… or your rate of return… or your number of years working… or all three. The important thing is to know where you’re going so you can devise a plan to get there.

Your First Steps Towards Achieving Financial Independence

If this sounds awfully basic, rest assured it isn’t. Studies show most Americans don’t have a clue how much to save for retirement.

The recently released 2012 Retirement Confidence Survey, conducted by the Employee Benefit Research Institute (EBRI), reveals that 42% of those polled are just guessing how much they’ll need in retirement and have no confidence in their retirement plans.

Fretting doesn’t change a thing, however. Money compounding does.

So get out the financial calculator…

  • Play with the numbers.
  • Adjust the amount saved.
  • Vary the annual returns.
  • Consider different retirement dates.

Keep it realistic – and decide what you need to do.

Take Bob Toski’s advice and aim for something specific. That’s your first step toward financial independence.

Good Investing,

Alex

Article by Investment U

Long-term rates don’t always track short rates-BOC study

By Central Bank News

   A cut in short-term interest rates by central banks during an economic recession does not necessarily lead to a fall in long-term interest rates, according to a study in the Bank of Canada’s Summer Review.
    Central banks typically use open market operations to control short-term interest rates and rely on this signal to be transmitted to the economically important long-term rates that govern the cost of credit to consumers and businesses.
    But this transmission mechanism has not always worked as expected. In 2004-2005 when the U.S. Federal Reserve raised its policy rates to slow growth, long-term rates actually declined,  a phenomenon famously described as a “conundrum” by then Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan.
    But a new model used by Bank of Canada economists shows that long-term rates are determined by two factors and this helps explain the conundrum, which in fact was part of a global phenomenon.
     The first, and traditional factor, is investors’ expectations of the future direction of short-term rates. These expectations are typically based on either actions or statements from the central bank.
    The second factor is the extra return that investors demand for holding a risky asset. The two economists find this risk premium is largely driven by global macroeconomic conditions. If the economy is slowing down, investors demand a higher yield to hold on to long-term bonds.
    “In particular, it is strongly countercyclical, rising sharply during global recessions and falling during global expansions,” the article said, adding:
    “This is an important phenomenon that central banks must consider in their monetary policy decision-making process. For example, markets may be pushing down long-term interest rates at the same time that tightening by central banks would be acting to raise them. Thus, in order to have the required effect on long-term rates, a larger move in the short-term policy rate may be necessary.”
    Click to read the article: “Global risk premiums and the transmission of monetary policy

    www.CentralBankNews.info

The Other Side of the Sanctions

By OilPrice.com

Iran has been pushed into a corner and is fighting for its life. The safest weapon in its arsenal is an economic strategy; and it is the one point where the United States is vulnerable.

There is no doubt about it. Section 1245 of the National Defense Authorization Act that was signed into law by President Obama on December 31, 2011 is having the intended effect upon Iran.

Unlike previous sanctions, Section 1245 attacks the foundation of the Iranian economy. The provisions of the law seek to stop the sale of crude oil and to block transactions between the Iranian central bank and the rest of the world. About fifty percent of the national budget is funded from the sale of exported crude oil that provides eighty percent of the foreign exchange.  “Crude (oil) sales are a trap which we inherited from the years before the (1979 Islamic) Revolution,” Khamenei told a gathering of researchers and scientists at the end of July.

An immediate consequence of the legislation has been the plunge in the exchange rate of the Iranian Rial that has lost half its value against the U.S. dollar. A combination of devalued currency and a break down in international bank transfers has created shortages of imported products, including basic food grains. The result is seen in an official inflation rate of 25 percent and an unemployment rate of 12.3 percent.

Before the implementation of the sanctions, Iranian oil exports were the second largest in OPEC at 2.2 million barrels per day.  Today, the current level is around 1.1 million barrels, but that does not take into account the oil leakage through the sanction barriers. A friendly government in Baghdad makes Iraq one of the easier routes to the world market. Shipments of gold bullion through Turkey to Iran indicate that the Iranians are selling to someone.

After nearly thirty years of dealing with American sanctions, the Iranians have developed methods of evading some of the restrictions, but the current application goes far beyond anything faced earlier. The National Iranian Oil Company has been forced to relinquish its monopoly of sales and authorized private traders to market the crude. The Oil Products Exporters Union expects to manage a fifth of exports and claims to have completed arrangements with refiners in Europe.

In spite of the evasive measures that are being employed, The Iranian treasury is still losing about thirty billion dollars per annum, a decline from seventy-two billion in 2011. Beyond that, reduced exports are causing a problem of what to do with the surplus.  On shore facilities have been filled. Seven million barrels are being held at Sidi Kerir in Egypt.

That leaves the tankers as the only other storage choice. Half the Iran tanker fleet of forty-seven ships is already sitting at anchor with tanks full and no place to go.

The less attractive possibility is for the National Iranian Oil Company to continue shutting down wells. Already, production has declined from 3.5 to 3.3 million barrels per day.

Once they are shut down and the pressurizing of the aging neglected wells stopped, salt water seepage will make it costly and difficult to reactivate them.  When they are reopened, production is likely to be reduced.  This is the long term damage that the sanctions will have upon the economy.

How long can they endure the losses?  That is the question that the Ayatollah has to be asking.

So far, there are no signs that people are starving from food shortages, and there is no indication that people are taking their grievances into the streets.  Regardless, Tehran cannot ignore the long term damage to the economy and the potential for social disorder.

Right now, the bombs are not falling.  Sooner or later, though, the risk of war must be resolved.  They cannot ignore that Section 1245 is a declaration of war; and must be treated accordingly.  The Ayatollah has said, “Threat for threat.”

Ayatollah Khamenei compares the present situation of Iran to Mohammed and his early followers who were besieged for three years in the desert of Saudi Arabia.  When there seemed to be no hope, they struck the surrounding superior army and defeated it at Badr and Kheybar.

He sees Iran is also surrounded by an enemy.  They are being confronted by two carrier battle groups with a formidable destructive capacity that Iran cannot hope to stop or to match; the repeated threats from politicians in the United States and Israel to attack Iranian nuclear facilities; the newest sanctions that are slowly strangling the economy; and Khamenei believes that it is all for the sole purpose of regime change.

That raises the question.  How does a minor military power contend with the forces available to the United States?  The leaders in Tehran talk about closing the Straits of Hormuz and developing new missiles.  It is all bravado that Khamenei hopes will calm anxieties at home and frighten potential aggressors.

Over the three decades of the Islamic Republic, the Iranians have been careful about pushing Washington to the point that it would retaliate militarily.  The Ayatollah is not going to provoke the U.S. to destroy the theocratic regime and his political career.

“….to defend ourselves we will attack on the same level as the enemies attack us,” Khamenei said on television in March.  Section 1245 is economic warfare.  That is most likely to be the battlefield that Khamenei will choose and it fits perfectly into the strategies employed over the centuries by the persecuted Shia minority

Where is the United States vulnerable economically?  It is the draconian character of the sanctions.

At the end of June, Washington did what was expected.  All twenty of Iran’s regular buyers were granted six month wavers that will push the next decision beyond the November election.  To have found any of the twenty governments to be in violation of the sanction restrictions would have compelled Washington to deny access to the U.S. financial system.  That would have Sparked an economic war with countries taking sides in support or in opposition to the United States.

It is no secret that many governments object to the sanctions and are willing to deal outside of normal channels for a reduced price.  If the Iranians should use the new private traders to dump a few million barrels of oil onto the market at a sharply discounted price, they just might encourage one of these governments to openly defy the United States for a bargain.  Should the United States imposes restrictions upon the offender, that could trigger an unwanted trade war,  while ignoring the challenge would render the sanctions meaningless and invite everyone else to go bargain hunting.

As a persecuted minority, the Shia have learned that the weaker in a conflict must employ cunning rather than muscle,. The philosophy is the core principle of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard that focuses upon the use of asymmetric warfare.  Employing economic tactics is just another form of the asymmetric warfare.

It is the inherent weakness of the alliance that is Iran’s strength. The unwillingness of Washington to pressure supposed allies and the simple fact that there are buyers willing to defy the sanctions secretly reveals the cracks in the system. If the Iranians can break through the weak point in the American siege, they will be able to repeat without firing a shot the triumph of Badr and Kheybar.

Source: http://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/The-Other-Side-of-the-Sanctions.html

By. Felix Imonti for Oilprice.com

 

 

Central Bank News Link List – Aug 16, 2012

By Central Bank News
    Here’s today’s Central Bank News link list, click through if you missed the previous link list. The list comprises news about central banks that is not covered by Central Bank News. The list is updated during the day with the latest developments so readers don’t miss any important news