Robert Kiyosaki Shocks Investors At FreedomFest

Article by Investment U

“The government makes capitalists and business people rich in America. The losers are the working middle class and poor.”

– Robert Kiyosaki

Two thousand wealthy investors and concerned citizens jammed into this year’s FreedomFest in Las Vegas to hear over 150 speakers talk mainly about the threats to our wealth, and how to survive and prosper during the ongoing financial crisis.

Among the star speakers were Steve Forbes, Senator Rand Paul, and Oxford Club members Alex Green, Marc Lichtenfeld and Steve McDonald and Wall Street Daily’s Karim Rahemtulla. (For a full report and how to buy the audio recordings, go to www.freedomfest.com.)

Without a doubt the most controversial speaker was Robert Kiyosaki, the real estate guru from Hawaii and author of Rich Dad, Poor Dad. He was the final speaker at FreedomFest, and he didn’t disappoint the crowd.

He bluntly told the audience that the richest people in America are capitalists and business people who take advantage of the system through cheap money, debt financing and tax shelters, not the hard-working employees who save money, buy a home, pay off their debts, and invest long term in a 401k. “They are the losers,” he said.

He accused the public schools of failing to teach sound financial principles. “Most of the teachers are not capitalists – they are socialists and fascists!” he declared.

He said what the public schools do teach is to avoid risk at all costs and be dependent on the government. “They teach that the government should take care of the people and control the economy.”

Moreover, they emphasize careers that lead to dependence on the state, especially after they retire on Social Security and Medicare. “They teach students to stay in school, get a degree, get a job, work hard, save money, buy a house, get out of debt and invest for the long run in the stock market.” This “safe” approach is the “worst advice,” he said, because you’re at risk of losing everything when the market collapses or the government runs out of money.

The audience reaction was either applause or a shocked look on their faces.

What to do? His topic was upbeat: “Be the Fed: Gaining Your Unfair Advantage in an Unfair System.” If you would like to hear his speech, go to www.miracleofamerica.com to reserve a copy.

His advice: Be a capitalist and take full advantage of the government’s easy-money policies and tax breaks. How? By using your savings, home equity and OPM (other people’s money) to invest in a business or real estate. He does both. He has a publishing house that employs a thousand people, noting that his appearance on “Oprah” led to sales of one million copies of Rich Dad, Poor Dad.

He remarked, “I made $5 million for one hour of work!” (According to Kiyosaki, Rich Dad, Poor Dad is the No. 1 financial education book ever written, with 35 million copies sold in various editions and translations.)

But he’s primarily a real estate speculator. He told us that he and his wife have over 3,500 rental units that generate millions of dollars in positive cash flow every year and owe little or no tax each year.

Of course, to do that requires huge debt financing, what he calls leverage. “I love debt,” he exclaimed. “I have about half a billion dollars in debt.” But, he noted, “The government and the Fed punish savers, and reward debtors. The dollar is a debt instrument that loses value every day.”

Who pays off the debt? “My tenants,” he argued.

Finally, he invests in commodities, such as gold and silver, and especially oil. He prefers oil and gas partnerships rather than publicly traded stocks, because of the 30% tax credit on partnerships.

“America is the biggest tax-free country in the world,” he stated emphatically… if you know how to play the game.

My take: Kiyosaki energized the audience and made them think. But his advice is not for the faint of heart. His approach applies to risk-takers who are willing to become entrepreneurs and start their own businesses or leverage their finances into rental properties.

But beware: 80% of all businesses fail. Making money in real estate is not easy. It’s a business like anything else, and if you borrow too much, pay too much for a property, or lose your tenants, you can find yourself in bankruptcy court.

For the majority of investors, there’s nothing wrong with getting a college degree, finding a good job, saving regularly, buying a house, paying off your debts and building a nest egg in stocks, bonds and commodities (including gold and silver coins). There are many ways to climb a mountain. I’ve met lots of financially conservative men and women who have worked hard and saved and invested successfully and are now multi-millionaires and set for life. You don’t have to own your own business or own dozens of rental properties to find financial independence.

You can make money – a lot of money – in the stock market if you know what you’re doing. There’s risk in everything, including stocks and real estate. As J. Paul Getty wrote, “The big profits go to the intelligent, careful and patient investor, not to the reckless and overeager speculator.”

In the economy, there are speculative hares and conservative turtles, and both can succeed or fail. Some people are driven to be entrepreneurs and risk takers, and if successful, they can become super rich. Others are destroyed by over leverage and bad timing. Not everyone is suited to go out on their own. For the vast majority, it’s better to be well-educated, save regularly and invest wisely in a diverse portfolio of good companies that are growing and pay quality dividends.

Enterprise Products Partners (NYSE: EPD), the Houston-based pipeline company, comes to mind. It’s been increasing its dividend quarterly since 1999.

Or Aberdeen-Asia Pacific Income Fund (AMEX: FAX), the Australian and emerging market sovereign debt fund, that pays a regular 5% annual yield. I call it “the fund that never loses money.” Over any three-year period since its incept (1986), it has not lost money.

Finally, how about business development companies (BDCs) that finance private companies? I’ve recommended one today for Investment U Plus subscribers that has increased its dividend four times this year as its net asset value grows.

All three of these examples are benefiting from the Fed’s easy-money policies, and are likely to do well in the future. There’s more than one way to “be the Fed.”

And if you’re interested in making good money in real estate, my favorite gurus are John Schaub (www.johnschaub.com) and Jack Reed (www.johnreed.com). I’ve known almost all the real estate gurus over the years, and they are two of the very best.

Good Investing, AEIOU

Mark

Article by Investment U

Read This Gold Price Warning Before You Buy Another Stock

By MoneyMorning.com.au

Since stock markets bottomed in 2009, both stocks and gold have risen…almost in tandem. And that’s because they’ve both risen for the same reason — money-printing.

Just this week, the minutes from the latest US Federal Reserve meeting indicated that most members were in favour of more intervention if the economy didn’t improve.

The high gold price is a signal that everything isn’t well with the market or the global economy. That’s why we remain cautious on stocks.

And the latest news backs up our view. Take this from Bloomberg News:

‘Applications for U.S. unemployment benefits climbed last week to a one-month high, showing scant progress in the labour market that’s left Americans more pessimistic about the economy.’

So odds are the US Fed will crank out more new dollars or fiddle with interest rates before the year is out.

But the money-printing can’t go on forever. At some point the general public will figure out printing money from thin air isn’t mending the economy. Well, perhaps the end is in sight. And contrary to what you might think, it could mean more good news for gold.

It’s Not Gold That’s Volatile…

Today’s Financial Times (FT) reports:

‘The gold standard has returned to mainstream US politics for the first time in 30 years, with a “gold commission” set to become part of official Republican party policy.’

Although forgive us if we don’t celebrate just yet. The odds of it happening are still pretty slim. Especially when you remember that the last time a Republican president was in office, this happened:

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

The biggest increase in money supply for at least 30 years. Of course, the FT can’t resist an opportunity to bash gold, however ill-informed the argument:

‘Inflation has remained under control in recent years, despite claims that expansion of the Fed’s balance sheet would lead to runaway price rises, while gold has been highly volatile. The price of the metal is up by more than 500 per cent in dollar terms over the past decade.

‘A return to a fixed money supply would also remove the central bank’s ability to offset demand shocks by varying interest rates. That could mean a more volatile economy and higher average unemployment over time.’

The ignorance of the mainstream never fails to amaze. The gold price simply reflects the uncertainty and volatility of paper money.

As the gold-haters like to point out, gold doesn’t do anything, it just sits there. If that’s the case how can it be volatile? The chemical make-up of gold doesn’t change from moment to moment.

What changes are the economy and the monetary system…thanks to the meddling of central bankers, governments, and bureaucrats. It’s these actions that cause market instability, and so investors value gold based on that instability.

In short, it’s the economy that’s volatile, not the gold price.

And as for ‘higher average unemployment over time’, how’s the current plan working? Not so well, we think.

Cheers,
Kris

Related Articles

Market Pullback Exposes Five Stocks to Buy

Things Are Looking Up for Gold

Why Currency Manipulation is a War on Your Wealth


Read This Gold Price Warning Before You Buy Another Stock

Stocks Are Up – Is it a Good Time to Buy?

By MoneyMorning.com.au

Which way should you turn?

US stocks are near a four-year high.

Australian stocks have jumped nearly 10% in just three months.

And gold is climbing back towards the magic USD$1,700 level again.

So, what should you do? Isn’t it a good thing when stock prices go up?

Isn’t that a sign that things are on the mend?

Maybe, but as any seasoned investor will tell you, it’s more important to know where prices are going than where they’ve been.

What you really need to know is whether financial assets represent good value at this price, and if so, how much further they could rise.

We’ll give you one view on what you should do below…

When it comes to stock investing, individual opinions don’t matter. That may shock you after everything we’ve written this week about the power of individualism.

But stick with us and we’ll explain.

The beauty of free markets is that the individual thoughts, actions, and expectations of investors come together to create a fair market price.

There’s no coercion. It’s a voluntary transaction. If you don’t like the price offered, you’re under no obligation to take it or pay it.

That pricing action is the same regardless of whether you’re buying an investment, a chocolate bar, or a new car.

(One Money Morning reader wrote in to say he used to have simple instructions for his staff: ‘Give the customers what they want. Smile. And take their money.’ That’s how business works.)

Of course, when you’re buying investments you don’t consume them. You buy them because you think the investment will be worth more in the future than today.

Right now, investors have driven US stocks to a four-year high, Aussie stocks to a 10% gain in three months, and gold towards USD$1,700.

It would be a fair comment to say that if stocks are going up, then it must mean companies are making profits. And if that’s the case, then maybe companies will make bigger profits next year…warranting even higher stock prices.

But what does this all mean for stock prices? As we mentioned at the top of this letter, US stock prices are high, and Australian stock prices have rallied strongly in recent weeks.

So is it time to fill up your portfolio with stocks?

How to Find Value in the Stock Market

In recent weeks we’ve suggested boosting your exposure to the market. Not by much, but enough so you’d benefit from a stock rally.

We even published a list of five beaten-down blue-chip stocks you should consider adding to your portfolio: Harvey Norman [ASX: HVN], JB Hi-Fi [ASX: JBH], Myer Holdings [ASX: MYR], Qantas [ASX: QAN], and Toll Holdings [ASX: TOL].

The price for each is higher than when we recommended them a few weeks back. But if you’re after a bunch of stocks to make up no more than 10-20% of your portfolio, we still reckon these stocks are worth looking at.

But be warned, just because stocks have risen, doesn’t mean they’ll keep going up. The high gold price is a warning sign to investors about the instability and risk in the global economy.

Our old chum, Sound Money.Sound Investments editor, Greg Canavan reminded his subscribers of this risk in his latest monthly issue.

He wrote:

‘During this long bear market (5 years and counting) momentary sharp rallies have lured many back into the market. That’s because rising prices anesthetise people’s brains to real analysis. The overwhelming complexity of the financial world means the vast majority of investors are content to let the price mechanism do the work for them. That is, a rising price means things must be getting better. Therefore, it must be a good time to ‘get back in’.’

Greg said investors need to be wary about the market repeating the pattern of the past five years…rallies followed by falls.

We agree.

As much as we like to see the market go up, we don’t believe the problems facing the global economy have ended.

So how do you know if the market is good value? And how do you know which markets are good value?

Fortunately, Greg has a simple strategy that investors can use to find value during a bear market. He’s explained this strategy to his readers in this month’s issue of his newsletter.

And the first part of it doesn’t so much involve looking at stocks as looking at the value of currencies first. Because according to Greg, ‘currency movements play a major role in long term portfolio performance.’ You can find out more about Greg’s analysis and how he’s using currencies to find value by clicking here…

Cheers,
Kris

Related Articles

Market Pullback Exposes Five Stocks to Buy

Things Are Looking Up for Gold

Why Currency Manipulation is a War on Your Wealth


Stocks Are Up – Is it a Good Time to Buy?

Are Apple Shares Still a Great Investment?

By MoneyMorning.com.au

Apple shares just seem to keep going up and have increased by over 80% during the last year. Virtually every Wall Street analyst is a buyer. Some commentators talk of Apple having a market value of $1trn one day.

But can the good times continue?

Only if Apple can keep its customers happy and fend off its competition without cutting prices. And here, history is not on its side.

Apple Has Great Products and Great Profits

Apple is a phenomenon. It has a range of products in the form of iPhones, iPads and Mac computers that customers love. Across the world people have been buying its products in droves and Apple’s profits and Apple’s share price have soared.

Apple is a staggeringly profitable business. During the last year its operating income has been nearly $36bn on a net capital investment of just over $12bn – giving it a return on investment of nearly 300%!

In many industries, returns like this would attract companies into the market and they would be competed away. Why isn’t this happening?

Source: MoneyWeek

Because most of its competition cannot copy what Apple is doing. So far, Apple has succeeded in selling products that seamlessly link up with each other with innovative new features. But things can change.

Can the Apple iPhone Fend Off Competition?

Take the smartphone market. Nokia has been slow to enter this market and has backed the wrong type of technology in Windows. HTC has struggled to grow despite having what many experts saw as a good product. But is the iPhone still a long-term winner from here?

It could be but the market is very interesting. The fact that Apple and Samsung are embroiled in a legal battle over smartphone patents is quite revealing. Samsung is making some good phones such as the Galaxy S III, which is a good competitor to the iPhone, especially outside America. Is Apple relying on the courts to protect itself against Samsung?

Then there is Google. At the moment, its interest in the smartphone market is with its Android operating system. Phones with Android are actually outselling the iPhone globally. Developers like its open platform and the phones do most of the things an iPhone can. On top of that they are also cheaper.

In many Asian markets where the iPhone is out of reach for many consumers, there are lots of cheap Android phones but no cheap Apple ones.

But does Google make much money out of Android?

Making money out of mobile advertising is not easy. If you look at Apple, you’d say that selling handsets is the way to go. This is where Google could threaten Apple. It bought the Motorola phone business and could use this to make a Google phone with its highly rated Chrome operating system.

The other potential concern on the iPhone is how long will mobile phone companies – particularly US ones – keep spending money keeping it affordable for customers?

The iPhone has been great for them, as people have wanted this ‘must-have’ product. But mobile operators – not Apple – have had to spend money to keep these products affordable. With revenues under pressure due to falling call rates, will they keep doing this? If they don’t, then will Apple sell as many iPhones?

The Tablet Market Looks Less Competitive

The competitive landscape in tablets looks easier for Apple. No one is really taking on its iPad. Samsung has had a go whilst the Kindle Fire is not really taking off. The iPad looks like it has become an iconic brand, and for many young people it is their idea of a computer.

How long can Apple defy the economics of consumer electronics?

Arguably one of the key reasons behind Apple’s success is its ability to keep innovating without cutting prices. Most consumer electronics products fall in price. That’s why the companies that make them always want you to upgrade to the latest model. Apple has been very good at doing this.

You get a better computer but it still costs about the same.

But how long can Apple keep doing this?

As you can see, the iPhone’s achieved revenue per unit has been quite resilient. However, Apple is getting $116 less for each iPad than it was a year ago. That’s fine if it’s costing less to make them. But it’s a potential profit problem if they are not or it can’t sell more of them.

That’s why the stock market gets excited about new products such as the iPhone 5 or Apple TV. It thinks that Apple can wave its magic wand and bring out another money-making product that keeps profits growing.

Common sense suggests that there are limits to how long any company can keep doing this. In Apple TV, Apple will have to take on the might of the cable operators. Will people want to buy what will probably be an expensive box when their cable operator will give them one for virtually nothing?

The TV market is different to computers and mobile phones. Content is much more important to people. Apple has the firepower to buy lots of content but it’s going to be more difficult to see the company dominating here.

Are Apple’s Shares Overvalued Now?

We’ve been positive on Apple shares so far this year. We thought they looked good value in January at $420. In April at $560, we were a bit more nervous but thought the shares were not ridiculously valued. On both occasions, you could have bought the shares for less than ten times profits when you adjusted for the huge pile of cash.

The competitive landscape can change quickly with technology companies. Now, with a market value of $627bin and $117bn of cash, based on expect net profits of $41.3bn the shares are more highly rated at 12.3 times cash adjusted profits ($510/$41.3).

This is not silly by any means but given the need to keep producing blockbuster products every year, we think it’s a good time to take some profits.

Phil Oakley
Contributing Editor, Money Morning

Publisher’s Note: This article originally appeared in MoneyWeek (UK)

From the Archives…

A Housing Bubble…Upon Bubble…Upon Bubble
17-08-2012 – Nick Hubble

How Government Extortion is Happening Right Before Our Eyes
16-08-2012 – Kris Sayce

Are Gold Stocks About to Turn?
15-08-2012 – Dr. Alex Cowie

The Amazing Ethanol Scam in the USA
14-08-2012 – Jeffrey Tucker

Why I’ve Done a U-Turn on Solar Energy
13-08-2012 – Kris Sayce


Are Apple Shares Still a Great Investment?

Why You Should Stay Away From Facebook Shares

By MoneyMorning.com.au

High profile flops don’t come much bigger than the flotation of website Facebook NASDAQ: FB. At its peak in the immediate aftermath of  the Facebbok IPO, it was trading at $45. At the moment, it trades at just under $20, less than half this level.


With the end of the lock-up period arriving, even major backers are cashing out. Peter Thiel, the first outside investor, who had 44 million shares before it went public and still has a seat on the board, has now mostly sold up. Luckily for him, even after seeing the price plunge, he stands to make a huge profit since he bought the shares cheaply in 2004.

So should other investors follow his lead?

This Facebook Insider Sale is a Bad Sign


Thiel’s decision to sell, but still remain on the board (he still has a small stake) has angered those who think he should have quit having cashed out. However, the bigger issue is what it says about the company.

Insiders tend to know a lot more about a company than the average investor. Unlike institutional investors, they are playing with their own money, not other peoples. And while the evidence is mixed on whether directors time their sales correctly, when someone like Thiel, with very intimate knowledge of a business, gets out, investors should take note.

Equally importantly, even at today’s share price Facebook is no bargain.

Facebook is Still Too Expensive


The major problem is that Facebook is simply too expensive. Even with the recent falls, it is priced at around 30 times 2013 earnings. This means that it has to keep growing quickly in order to justify its valuation. Sadly, it is hard to see how it can do this.

One possible way is through more ads. The downside is that this risks losing subscribers. The trouble is that users are often unwilling to accept the sort of large banner ads that big companies want.

It’s an issue that all online media firms are having to grapple with but it matters more for Facebook, given its lofty valuation, than for most others.

The example of MySpace shows what can happen when the time comes to convert users into dollars. At the time of its sale to News Corp in 2005 for $900m it was second only to Facebook in size.

However, the board found that they could only meet targets for ad revenue by inserting ads into every nook and cranny. Users rumbled the tactic and defected en masse to Facebook, leaving the firm to be sold last year for $35m.

There is also a big question mark about whether data on the number of Facebook users – a key stat for advertisers – is even correct. A recent BBC report claims that many profiles may be fake. More worryingly, some advertisers are now alleging that many of the clicks that Facebook ads attract do not come from human viewers but rather from automated programmes.

Facebook’s Threat From Competitors


While Facebook has managed to fend off similar websites, there is no guarantee that this will remain the case. It is not legally impossible to set up a Facebook clone. Rivals have also learnt lessons from the failure of early attempts to copy Facebook.

Already it has been unable to stop the network VK.com from dominating the Russian market. And if Microsoft or Apple decided to build a clone, Facebook could be in serious trouble.

Meanwhile Google are putting a lot of effort into making their users sign up to Google+, Google’s own network. It’s still growing whereas Facebook looks to have stalled, which is why we think Google is the better investment.

Buy Google Shares Instead of Facebook Shares


If you want to buy an Internet technology share, we’d suggest Google NASDAQ: GOOG instead. The company is trading at a far more reasonable forward price/earnings (p/e) ratioof 13.7. It has a proven track record of growth and a more diversified business model.

It boasts YouTube, Gmail, the Android operating system for tablets and smartphones, and Chrome. It also has its own version of Facebook in Google+. These channels offer a wider range to advertisers than Facebook’s social network. In short it offers an investor more than Facebook can offer, for less risk.

Matthew Partridge

Contributing Editor, Money Morning 

 Publisher’s Note: This is an edited version of an article that first appeared in MoneyWeek (UK)

From the Archives…

A Housing Bubble…Upon Bubble…Upon Bubble
17-08-2012 – Nick Hubble

How Government Extortion is Happening Right Before Our Eyes
16-08-2012 – Kris Sayce

Are Gold Stocks About to Turn?
15-08-2012 – Dr. Alex Cowie

The Amazing Ethanol Scam in the USA
14-08-2012 – Jeffrey Tucker

Why I’ve Done a U-Turn on Solar Energy
13-08-2012 – Kris Sayce


Why You Should Stay Away From Facebook Shares

AUDUSD is facing 1.0410 support again

AUDUSD is facing 1.0410 support again, a breakdown below this level will indicate that the downtrend from 1.0612 has resumed, then another fall to 1.0300 area could be seen. However, as long as 1.0410 support holds, one more rise to test 1.0612 previous high resistance is still possible, a break above this level will signal resumption of the longer term uptrend 0.9581 (Jun 1 low), then further rise towards 1.0800 could be expected.

audusd

Forex Signals

American Virility

By The Sizemore Letter

You really never know where a conversation on demographic trends will sprout up.

I recall a conversation I had nearly a decade ago in a London pub with some Italian classmates from my graduate program at the London School of Economics. After, perhaps, one pint too many, I decided to rile my new friends by suggesting that Italy’s low birthrate—one of the lowest in the world—was somehow due to a deficiency in Italian masculinity. Could it be that the heirs of Casanova had simply lost their mojo?

After a volley of curses and obscene gestures thrown my direction, one of the Italians informed the table that it was the fault of “my people” and their <expletive> Yankee birth control.

So yes, in addition to its uses as a research and forecasting tool, demographics can be used by immature male grad students to haze one another while drinking.

I remembered this story as I read a recent issue of The Economist.  In “Virility Symbols”, The Economist notes that the American birthrate—long the pride of red-meat-eating Americans—had fallen below the level of France. France!

There are several ways to calculate birth rates, but the most common and easiest to conceptualize is the total fertility rate (TPR), or the number of children the average woman can expect to have over her lifetime. The replacement rate is 2.1 children; one child for each parent with a small allowance for mortality. The United States has held steady at this level for years, even while most of Europe and East Asia was well below it.

The Economist writes, “it comes as something of a shock to discover that in 2011 America’s fertility rate was below replacement level and below that of some large European countries. The American rate is now 1.9 and falling. France’s is 2.0 and stable. The rate in England is 2.0 and rising slightly.”

America’s birth dearth coincided with the 2008 crisis and the economic dislocations that followed. As The Economist continues,

Recession seems to have reduced fertility through at least two channels. First, migrants often cannot find work and go back home. Since they tend to have slightly larger families than native-born citizens, this reduces fertility…

Second, loss of income, compounded by the housing crisis, is causing young people to postpone marriage, the setting up of new homes, and having children. In 2011 the Pew Research Centre asked 18-to-34-year-old Americans about their reaction to recession: 22% said they had postponed having a baby and 20% said they had postponed marriage as a result.

Young Americans will start procreating again. It is inevitable. The record births of 2007 were primarily to Generation X mothers, and we should remember that Generation X is significantly smaller than the Baby Boomers that preceded them and the Echo Boomers that came after them. As a generation, the front end of the Echo Boomers is just now turning 30 and the bulk of them are still in college. We have another baby boom coming, and the implications for everything from starter houses to shopping malls are enormous.

Still, in the meantime, Americans might have a few bruises on their collective national ego. As The Economist concludes, there is no “profound transatlantic difference between virile Americans and flaccid Europeans.”

This article is an excerpt of Part II of the August 2012 issue of the HS Dent Forecast.

SUBSCRIBE to Sizemore Insights via e-mail today.

Related posts:

Renewable Energy Ambitions, Independence & Donald Trump – An Interview with Alex Salmond

By OilPrice.com

We were fortunate enough to have some time with Scotland’s First Minister Alex Salmond where we discussed a broad range of topics from Scotland’s ambitious renewable energy targets and North Sea oil & gas to Scottish independence and Donald Trump.

In the interview, Alex discusses:

* How Scotland will achieve its ambitious renewable energy targets.  * The impact North Sea oil and gas revenues would have on an independent Scotland.  * How Scotland can become the green energy capital of Europe.  * Donald Trumps recent tantrum over offshore wind energy.  * The impact Independence would have on the Scottish economy.  * Why companies are continuing to invest in Scotland’s renewable energy sector.  * Why Scotland would establish an oil fund and how it would be used.  * Why the shale revolution will not affect investment in Scottish renewables.  * The recent partnership between Scotland and Abu Dhabi.  * How Scotland will achieve its ambitious renewable energy targets.

Alex Salmond is the First Minister of Scotland and head of the Scottish National Party. He is a champion of green energy and has a vision to transform Scotland into a renewable energy powerhouse whilst aggressively reducing the country’s carbon emissions.

 

Interview conducted by James Stafford of Oilprice.com

Oilprice.com: If Scotland manages to gain its independence it would receive a 90% geographical share of North Sea oil and gas fields based on a division under international maritime law, roughly 81% of current oil and gas receipts, worth between $9.67 – $19.34 billion annually. Is this income crucial to the SNP’s future economic policies?

Alex Salmond: Even without our offshore oil and gas reserves, Scotland currently has the third highest output per head in the UK, after London and the South-East. And when oil and gas output is included, Scotland’s output per head is 15% above the UK average.

Energy is important to Scotland’s economy. We have world class companies operating in the global oil and gas supply chain while we will benefit from Scotland’s second energy windfall in renewable energy where we have around a quarter of Europe’s potential offshore wind and tidal energy and some 10% of its wave energy resource.

Oilprice.com: What plans do you have for investing this revenue back into Scotland?

Alex Salmond: In contrast to other oil rich nations, successive UK Governments have failed to take the action necessary to ensure that future generations benefit from the economic windfall from Scottish oil and gas. An independent Scotland would use its oil and gas reserves far more responsibly. Specifically, the Scottish Government would establish an oil fund, once fiscal conditions allow. The development of an oil fund for Scotland would promote economic responsibility and stability. Revenues could be invested, rather than spent on current expenditure, during good financial times, and could counteract the effects of economic downturns.

Oilprice.com: You have stated that there is no chance of any new nuclear power plants being built in Scotland. Does this anti-nuclear stance go as far as shutting down current nuclear power plants? I saw that nuclear power currently provides up to 33% of Scotland’s electricity generation needs – how soon would you hope to close the plants down, and where would you find the extra power?

Alex Salmond: We have always been clear that as long as the safety case can be made we are supportive of the possible life extension of existing nuclear power stations but that we are opposed to the development of new nuclear build in Scotland. New build nuclear power is vastly expensive and prone to delay – and shut downs in recent times have meant they have not been meeting 40 per cent of Scotland’s energy needs. We do not support subsidies for new nuclear.

Nuclear power will also leave a legacy of waste and vast decommissioning costs for the next generation of Scots – we will not add to the issues of decommissioning by building new nuclear plants in Scotland. The legacy we must leave future generations is a world where invention and innovation is used to harness the earth’s natural resources sustainably. And it is in wind, wave and tidal energy, and in carbon capture and storage, where Scotland has strong competitive advantages, both in terms of capacity and expertise. This is where it makes economic sense to concentrate our efforts, and that is what we are doing.

Oilprice.com: Scotland is famously doing very well in achieving its renewable energy goals with provisional generation statistics confirming that 2011 was a record year for renewable generation in Scotland, up 28.1 % from the previous record in 2009. Your well publicized target is 100% renewable electricity by 2020. How are you coming along with that? Is this figure really achievable?

Alex Salmond: Our Electricity Generation Policy Statement confirms that our 100% renewable electricity is technically feasible although we are not complacent and accept that it will be challenging. Delivery of the target will require around 16GW of capacity. We currently have almost 5GW operational. With a further 3.3 GW consented or operational and over 20GW in planning or scoping we are confident that the target can be delivered.

Oilprice.com: If Scotland manages to achieve 100% renewable electricity by 2020, will it continue to invest in renewable energy technology and look to become an energy exporter?

Alex Salmond: Scotland is fortunate in having a massive green energy potential. We have the best capacity for CCS in the European Union as well as a buoyant oil and gas regime, with record levels of capital investment. Our wind and seas hold some of the most concentrated potential not only across the UK and Europe, but in the world – our practical offshore renewables resource has been estimated at 206 GW. By harnessing around a third of this resource, installed offshore renewables capacity could reach 68 GW by 2050 – enough to meet Scotland’s own domestic electricity needs seven times. Around 20 per cent of the electricity generated in Scotland is already exported to the rest of the UK and Scotland can go far beyond this to become the green energy capital of Europe.

Oilprice.com: Offshore wind farms are an important part of Scotland’s renewable energy future, but what do you say about the concerns of small fishing villages, such as those of East Neuk, who fear that their livelihoods will be threatened?

Alex Salmond: “Communities across the country stand to benefit from the development of Scotland’s huge offshore clean energy resources and clearly the fishing industry is right at the heart of many coastal communities, so we aim to strike the right balance between our renewables ambitions and other competing uses for the seas. That’s why Marine Scotland is actively engaged with the industry, for example, through a trilateral policy group, bringing together government, renewables and fisheries, and by ensuring fishermen are represented on two other renewable energy steering groups and where possible engaging them in an operational capacity such as undertaking fisheries liaison duties.. It is also undertaking mapping and research into areas used by the fishing industry, including sensitive fisheries. At an individual project level, Marine Scotland is required by statute to fully consult relevant stakeholders, including the fishing industry, and the public, before any offshore renewable project can be consented or rejected.”

Oilprice.com: Donald Trump has made a public complaint and set up a campaign to prevent offshore wind farms along the coast of Scotland. I imagine he is more worried about the view from his luxury golf resort than the plight of the local communities, but the local communities do still back him. Do you believe his campaign could receive enough support to prove troublesome, or will you always be able to laugh it off as the tantrum of man who is used to getting his own way?

Alex Salmond: In terms of the local community, I’d simply point out that so far there have been some 460 representations from members of the public supporting the Offshore Wind Demonstrator project, compared to 137 against. Of course, as we have made clear throughout, each project is determined on it merits taking into account views of stakeholders, consultees and members of the public. In general terms, however, several recent surveys have shown strong public support for clean energy, including wind power.

Some 71 per cent of people in Scotland backed wind power as part of our energy mix in a Scottish Renewables/YouGov poll published around the time Mr Trump gave his evidence to the Scottish Parliament Committee. The development of the low carbon economy, driven by a renewables revolution that reindustrialises communities across Scotland, was a clear commitment in the last election which we won convincingly. So, I’m confident that our support for Scotland’s world-leading renewables industry is well welcomed across Scotland. Communities are already benefiting from thousands of jobs and tens of millions of pounds of investment. Over last year, around £750 million of new renewable electricity projects began generating in Scotland, while there is a potential future pipeline of renewable electricity projects with a capital value of around £46 billion.

Oilprice.com: Angus Armstrong, director of macroeconomic research at NIESR, said that “even with a favourable settlement on future oil revenues, its (Scotland’s) fiscal balances are likely to be volatile with large deficits in some years as a result of its dependence on oil revenues.” He suggested that an independent Scotland’s debt would be about 70% of the country’s gross domestic product. Does this fear have any founding? How do you intend to protect Scotland from an over reliance on oil revenues?

Alex Salmond: As a result of the financial crisis and the management of the public finances by successive UK Governments, the UK has a considerable national debt. Debt that Scotland will have to repay independent or not. If UK debt was allocated on a per capita basis, then for 2010-11 – the last year in which figures are fully available – Scotland’s net debt would be 51% of GDP compared to 60% of GDP for the UK.

Scotland has a broad tax base and is not overly reliant on North Sea revenues. For example even when North Sea revenues fell by 50% in 2009-10, during the global financial crises, Scotland’s fiscal position remained stronger than the UK’s.

Oilprice.com: The partnership deal with Masdar, the Abu Dhabi clean energy company, could be hugely lucrative and beneficial for Scotland. We know that the agreement covers; offshore and onshore wind, carbon capture and storage, investment in the low carbon economy, and renewable energy research and development, but could you give us a more detailed account as to what Scotland will benefit from, and what Abu Dhabi will benefit from?

Alex Salmond: Globally, we need to make the transition from an economy which largely generates energy from fossil fuels to one based on renewable energy. The issues that Scotland and Abu Dhabi will work on together are among the key challenges that confront the world as it moves to a low carbon future: how to develop commercial onshore and offshore wind projects of scale; how to reduce the cost of offshore wind; the implementation of projects for carbon capture and storage; smart grids; power electronics; bio-energy; building technologies and solar power. Both Abu Dhabi and Scotland know that countries which develop the low carbon technologies to power the planet in the future will gain significant economic benefits, whether it is from the sale of technology, the manufacture of turbines and machinery, or the export of clean electricity itself. The Framework for Action between Scottish Enterprise, Masdar, the 12 Scottish universities of the Energy Technology Partnership and the Masdar Institute for Science and Technology brings together a huge amount of accumulated expertise. Masdar is a very attractive partner because its basic premise is to invest in and develop low carbon technologies and Scotland has massive investment opportunities, for example in offshore wind. Masdar is making significant investments in markets outside the UAE and is ambitious to invest further in the UK. Masdar, which has a number of investment funds which take shares in hi-tech companies, will consider potential investment opportunities in the Clean Technology sector in Scotland. Both Abu Dhabi and Scotland are committed to using our existing expertise in the oil and gas industry to help us in the transition to a low-carbon economy, for example Scotland’s North Sea experience can help cut the costs of offshore wind. Our partnership is also a wider statement of intent that it makes about the role that Scotland and Abu Dhabi intend to play in helping the world to meet its future energy needs.

Oilprice.com: If Scotland achieves its independence, in what areas are you looking to exert that independence? I have read that you will still keep the pound sterling as your currency, but that means that monetary policies will be set/heavily influenced by the Bank of England.

Alex Salmond: Scottish Ministers have outlined our intention to stay in a sterling zone with the rest of the UK, which would be in the best interests of the Scottish and UK economies.
“The Bank of England has had operational independence from the UK Government since 1997 – a position we would support post independence.

The aim of monetary policy is to provide the overall stable macroeconomic framework that is conducive to growth. What independence would provide is access to the key levers – particularly fiscal policy – which would give the Scottish Government the ability to tailor a full range of policies to meet the specific needs of the Scottish economy. These levers could include the use of taxation and regulation to boost innovation, skills and attract investment.

Oilprice.com: Do you think that Scottish Independence will be contested in Europe? It could prove a troublesome issue for countries, for example, the regions of Catalonia or the Basque Country could decide to separate themselves and declare their independence from Spain.

Alex Salmond: An independent Scotland would inherit membership of the EU as a successor state, in the same way as the rest of the UK, and Scotland brings a great deal to the EU table. We are a leader in the field of climate change, we are natural-resource rich, we have 10% of Europe’s coastline and 20% of Europe’s seas and we enjoy vast renewables potential, including around a quarter of Europe’s offshore wind and tidal energy resource, and as much as a tenth of Europe’s wave power potential, and in the North Sea Western Europe’s largest oil and natural gas reserves – crucial to the Commission’s objectives for energy security of supply.

Scotland’s constitutional position within the UK is very different from the Spanish context, but in any event Spain have already confirmed that they would have no objections to Scottish independence and membership of the EU. Spanish Foreign Minister José Manuel García-Margallo, is quoted in the Spanish newspaper Diario Vasco on 24th February 2012 saying that “If in the UK both parties agree that this is consistent with their constitutional order, written or unwritten, Spain would have nothing to say, just that this does not affect us. No one would object to a consented independence of Scotland.

Oilprice.com: Is Scottish independence crucial to your renewable energy plans for the future?

Alex Salmond: The Scottish Government has a very strong vision of the opportunities that independence would bring to Scotland in the energy sector. We are aiming for a transformation – a re-industrialisation along the lines of a green economy. The Scottish Government strongly believes that the increasingly integrated EU energy market means it is in the shared interests of Scotland and the rest of the UK to continue with the GB-wide energy and electricity markets after Scottish independence. This would be similar in principle to the many international sharing arrangements which already exist, for example the All-Islands Approach agreed by UK, Scottish and Irish governments. Scotland can continue to play a key role in ensuring security of supply for the UK. The costs of low carbon electricity generation, be it in Scotland, England, Wales or Northern Ireland, to allow us collectively to meet international obligations to reduce polluting emissions, would continue to be spread equally across the consumer base.

Oilprice.com: Subsidies for renewable energy programs are losing popularity in many countries as expensive startup costs and the shale gas revolution make these technologies economically unfeasible. How are you attracting investors to your various programs?

Alex Salmond: Scotland has a natural competitive advantage in the transition to the low carbon economy given our vast renewable energy resources and our history of technological innovation. We believe that our competitive advantage lies in being at the forefront of technological innovation: this is achievable for a small nation. We want to make Scotland the destination for international investment in low carbon, and for the development of the financial architecture for a global low carbon economy, by operating at the forefront of development of clean energy. You also have to provide investment certainty. In 2009 the Scottish Parliament unanimously passed The Climate Change (Scotland) Act 2009. This groundbreaking piece of legislation sets a world-leading target of at least a 42% cut in national greenhouse gas emissions by 2020 compared to 1990. As well as having all-party support, the Scottish legislation received support from across Scottish civil society such as business organisations, trade unions and environmental groups. The aim of the Act was to provide certainty for businesses and the public about Scotland’s low carbon future. We have backed up the legislation with a comprehensive delivery framework. So business, and investors know that Scotland is serious about leading the low carbon transition and International energy companies are making Scotland their base for research and development in offshore wind and marine energy.

Climate change campaigner and Nobel Laureate Al Gore praised Scotland’s commitment to renewables when he said: “Scotland has not only provided inspiring leadership, you are exploiting one of the greatest resources anywhere on the planet, with wind onshore and particularly offshore, all sorts of variety of windmills – and the new renewable technologies are especially important”. So clearly, major international figures think we have the framework right in Scotland.

Oilprice.com: Given the SNP commitment to renewable energy independence would you be able to discuss the importance of wave & tidal power in the overall renewable matrix?

Alex Salmond: The Scottish Government sees wave and tidal as playing a central role in the energy mix given their ability to complement and balance other forms of renewable energy generation. In the short term our priority is to develop the industry through small arrays to meet as much as possible of the ambitious plans for over 1GW of wave and tidal in the Pentland Firth and Orkney waters by 2020.

We have also consented a 10 megawatt tidal power array in the Sound of Islay; this is the world’s largest consented wave or tidal stream project. We have launched the Saltire Prize, Scotland’s £10 million energy challenge to the world to push back the boundaries of marine energy innovation will accelerate the commercial development of wave and tidal technology.

Oilprice.com: Would Edinburgh join the EU? If so, what does that mean for its renewable energy targets?

Alex Salmond: Scotland is and will remain a member of the EU. We already have ambitious targets, above the EU target, so we will take those ambitions to the top table in Europe. Scotland has a target of delivering the equivalent of 100% of domestic electricity demand from renewables – far above the EU target of about 30% for the UK – we exceeded that last year.

Oilprice.com: Should you gain independence from the United Kingdom, do you believe North Sea oil will give Edinburgh enough cash to shield it from similar debt burdens plaguing the eurozone?

Alex Salmond: Scotland has had a lower fiscal deficit than the UK over the past five years as a whole. Scottish Ministers believe that with the additional economic levers that independence would provide, and the £1.5 trillion asset based provided by Scotland’s remaining oil and gas reserves, an independent Scotland would stand on a strong financial footing.

An independent Scotland would establish a credible fiscal framework to ensure Scotland’s public finances were put on a sustainable footing. In order to facilitate this process, the Scottish Government has recently established a Fiscal Commission Working Group (comprising of Professors Joseph Stiglitz; Andrew Hughes Hallett; Sir Jim Mirrlees; and Frances Ruane) to oversee the crucial work to assist in the design of a fiscal and macroeconomic framework for Scotland which entrenches financial responsibility.

Oilprice.com: A recent Citigroup research report estimated that to achieve your renewable energy goals you would need to invest between £6 billion to £7 billion a year. Where do you see this investment coming from? As green energy has not delivered good returns for investors in the past.

Alex Salmond: The Citigroup report was widely criticised by industry in Scotland and the proof is that investors are continuing to invest in Scotland. The UK Government estimates announcements more of renewables investment and jobs in 2011-12 in Scotland were £1.7 billion with 4411 jobs, with a potential £8bn and 3313 jobs in the pipeline – that’s more investment in the pipeline than the rest of the UK put together – significantly more. There have been a string of announcements by major domestic and international companies making significant investments in Scotland encouraged by our commitment to the low carbon revolution: Scottish and Southern Energy, Iberdrola Scottish Power, Gamesa, Mitsubishi, Samsung, Gaia Wind, Global Energy Group, Aquamarine Power. And we have seen substantial £7bn of investment in grid connections in Scotland being fasttracked by Ofgem in particular to strengthen the capacity to export green electricity to England – Scotland already exports around a fifth of our electricity generation. And of course we heard recent welcome news that the Green Investment Bank, with capital of £3bn, will have its HQ in Edinburgh.

Oilprice.com: Alex, thank you for taking the time to go through our questions.

Source: http://oilprice.com/Interviews/Making-Scotland-the-Green-Energy-Capital-of-Europe-Interview-with-Alex-Salmond.html

Interview by. James Stafford of Oilprice.com

 

 

Single- and Multi-Bar Price Analysis: Could It Help You Forecast the Markets?

EWI’s Jeffrey Kennedy shows you what a simple price bar can tell you about a market

By Elliott Wave International

Senior Analyst Jeffrey Kennedy has spent over 15 years developing techniques to “read between the lines” on a price chart, and he shares some of his techniques with you in a FREE eBook: Learn to Identify High Confidence Trading Opportunities Using Price Bars and Chart Patterns.

You’d be amazed at how a simple price bar can provide you with so much information that can improve your trading success. In this excerpt from his eBook, Jeffrey explains how to interpret price bars and what that means for the subsequent market moves. Learn how you can download the entire 14-page eBook below.

 

Here’s a picture of two different price bars that we will consider to be daily price bars. What story does the single price bar on the left tell you?

Prices opened that day at the lowest price and closed at the highest price, which means that the buyers, or bulls, are in total control of the market. The bears have no power whatsoever, and, because the market closed so high, odds are that the price will continue up the next day. As I said, one price bar can give you tons of information about a financial market.

Now, look at the price bar on the right. It tells you a similar story in the opposite direction. Once the market opened, it got slammed to the down side. It stayed down hard all day and closed on the lows. A market like this is dominated by the bears, the sellers, and odds favor further decline the following day. It means that the bulls, or the buyers, have no control in this market.

Although these kinds of price bars are fairly rare, they may open your eyes to how much information a single price bar can contain, especially if you know how to interpret it.

These two price bars are more like what you will encounter every day.

The price bar on the left side shows that the bears, or the sellers, opened the market up and pushed it down a little bit. In a sense, they had some control, but not much. Then the buyers, or the bulls, took control of this market so that it closed above the open. This type of price bar shows up in an uptrending market.

Conversely, the price bar on the right often shows up in downtrending markets. It signifies that the bears control the market. You could say that the buyers gave it a feeble attempt early on, but by the close, the sellers had taken over. Closes don’t lie, and they are the most important item on the price chart.

 

Learn to Identify High Confidence Trading Opportunities Using Price Bars and Chart Patterns

When you look at a price chart, can you quickly spot the dominant trend? What about important reversals, or possible support/resistance levels?

EWI has just released a free 14-page eBook: Learn to Identify High Confidence Trading Opportunities Using Price Bars and Chart Patterns. Senior Analyst Jeffrey Kennedy has spent over 15 years developing techniques to “read between the lines” on a price chart, and he shares some of his techniques with you in this new resource. You’ll be amazed at how a simple price chart can provide you so much information that can improve your trading success.

Learn how to get your free eBook >>

 

This article was syndicated by Elliott Wave International and was originally published under the headline Single- and Multi-Bar Price Analysis: Could It Help You Forecast the Markets?. EWI is the world’s largest market forecasting firm. Its staff of full-time analysts led by Chartered Market Technician Robert Prechter provides 24-hour-a-day market analysis to institutional and private investors around the world.

 

 

Loonie Drops on Poor Retail Sales Data

By TraderVox.com

Tradervox.com (Dublin) – The Canadian dollar dropped against the greenback for the second day after retail sales dropped in June more than the market had expected. This has ignited concerns that the Canadian economy experiencing difficulties in gaining momentum. However, the decline was limited as the Federal Open Market Committee meeting minutes showed that most members are willing to support additional stimulus to spur growth if information coming from the US does not indicate economic growth. The demand for safety drove commodity related currencies down as the yen held its gains.

David Doyle has indicated that the FOMC minutes report is having a great effect on the market right now which might spillover to Asia trading session. Doyle, who a Strategist at Macquarie Capital Markets in Toronto, also added that the market is likely to continue with this risk-on environment for the next one to two weeks. This will probably push the Canadian dollar up against the greenback. In a statement to the press, Mark Carney, the Bank of Canada Governor, reiterated that the higher borrowing cost maintained by the bank may be appropriate if domestic demand-driven expansion continues. The Canadian economy seems to weather the current global economic slowdown which is hampering economic growth in many countries.

Carney also expressed optimism in the economic growth rate, where he said that it is expected to accelerate through next year. He also noted that the economic momentum is in line with the potential output. Despite this optimism, a report from Statistic Canada showed that the Retail Sales dropped by 0.4 percent to reach C$38.7 billion. The report was against the market expectation of 0.1 gain, but is in line with other reports this month which has shown declines in wholesale sales, employment, and building permits. The consumer prices have also slowed in this month.

The Canadian dollar dropped by 0.2 percent against the US dollar to exchange at 99.14 cents per US dollar at the close of trading in Toronto. The currency had touched 98.43 cents yesterday, which is the strongest it has been since May 3.

Disclaimer
Tradervox.com is not giving advice nor is qualified or licensed to provide financial advice. You must seek guidance from your personal advisors before acting on this information. While we try to ensure that all of the information provided on this website is kept up-to-date and accurate we accept no responsibility for any use made of the information provided. Opinions expressed at Tradervox.com are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Tradervox.com or its management. 

Article provided by TraderVox.com
Tradervox.com is a Forex News Portal that provides real-time news and analysis relating to the Currency Markets.
News and analysis are produced throughout the day by our in-house staff.
Follow us on twitter: www.twitter.com/tradervox