EUR/USD is stuck in an ascending triangle, is a breakout imminent?

Introduction

EUR/USD has teased the resistance level at 1.2310 a number
of times, but it has been unable to break it. At the same time, it has been
forming a slope of higher lows. As a result, the common currency has formed a
nice-looking ascending triangle pattern.

 

Factors Affecting

It seems the euro zone debt problems have not raised their
ugly head in the market for sometime now. Today, the current account from the
euro zone gave a reading of 10.9B against a projected value of 5.3B. As a
result, this positive data made the demand of the euro to rise in the market.
Nonetheless, traders are still keen on any news updates about the euro zone
debt situation.

 

Technical Analysis

Technical analysis on the EUR/USD reveals it is has formed
an ascending triangle pattern. If the pair convincingly breaks out of the
pattern to the downside, it may drop to the support level at 1.2170. On the
other hand, if the pair convincingly breaks out of the pattern to the upside,
it may test the resistance level at 1.2370.

 

Forecast

Currently, the pair is on a downtrend in the short term.
Therefore, aggressive traders should just wait for further confirmation before
going short on the pair.

To read more from Shawn James subscribe to pipstoday.

 

Euro novamente em declinio

By TraderVox.com

Tradervox.com (Dublin) – A moeda de 17 nações caiu contra a maioria dos pares mais importantes após especulações de que um relatório da confiança dos consumidores previsto para ser emitido dia 23 de julho irá demonstrar um enfraquecimento na confiança do consumidor e setor industrial na região.

O Euro está prestes a atingir uma baixa de 4 semanas contra o Iene. A moeda única européia está sofrendo, fazendo com que investidores procure os moedas mais seguras. A demanda do Dólar foi impulsionada pelo crescente índice do Dólar, que subiu pela primeira vez em quase uma semana, a demanda para o dólar foi apoiado pelo enfraquecimento das ações da Ásia.

Falando sobre o relatório da confiança do consumidor, Andrew Salter, que é um estrategista de moedas do Australian & New Zealand Banking Group, em Sydney, disse que há uma série de problemas com a economia da zona do Euro e é claro que há uma contração aguda. Ele previu que o Euro continuará a enfraquecer na próxima semana. O euro aumentou em relação ao dólar cerca de 0.1% na semana, mas diminuiu 0,6% em relação ao iene.

Economistas esperam um Índice de sentimentos domésticos manter-se inalterado este mês a partir do mês de junho com 19,8 negativos. Este número deverá ser confirmado na segunda-feira, 23 de julho.

Article provided by TraderVox.com
Tradervox.com is a Forex News Portal that provides real-time news and analysis relating to the Currency Markets.
News and analysis are produced throughout the day by our in-house staff.
Follow us on twitter: www.twitter.com/tradervox

Euro Down on Confidence Data Speculations

By TraderVox.com

Tradervox.com (Dublin) – The 17-nation currency has declined against most of its major peers following speculations that a consumer confidence report set to be released on July 23 will show a weakening in consumer confidence and manufacturing sector in the region. The euro is set to record a fourth weekly decline against the yen, after Spanish bond yields surged in an auction yesterday. This has continued to put euro under scrutiny as investors avoid the currency for safe haven currencies. The US currency’s demand was boosted by the rising Dollar Index, which rose for the first time in almost a week; the demand for the dollar was supported by the weakening Asian stocks.

Talking about the consumer confidence report, Andrew Salter, who is a currency strategist at Australian & New Zealand Banking Group in Sydney, said that there are a number of issues with the euro zone economy and it is clear that there is an acute contraction. He predicted that the 17-nation currency will continue to weaken in the coming week. The euro has increased against the dollar by 0.1 percent on the week, but has declined by 0.6 percent against the yen. The US dollar has had a tough week after a series of disappointing data and sentiments. The greenback has dropped by 0.7 percent against the yen on the week.

Economists are expecting an Index of household sentiments to remain unchanged this month from the month of June at negative 19.8. This figure is expected to be confirmed on Monday July 23, when it is scheduled to be released by the European Commission. Further, a gauge of manufacturing is expected to show a figure of 45.3 which is below the level of 50, indicating contraction in the sector. This report by Markit Economics is scheduled to be released on July 24.

These bearish sentiments on the euro zone data has sent the euro down by 0.2 percent against the US dollar to trade at $1.2260. The 17-nation currency has remained unchanged at 96.43 yen per euro.

Disclaimer
Tradervox.com is not giving advice nor is qualified or licensed to provide financial advice. You must seek guidance from your personal advisors before acting on this information. While we try to ensure that all of the information provided on this website is kept up-to-date and accurate we accept no responsibility for any use made of the information provided. Opinions expressed at Tradervox.com are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Tradervox.com or its management. 

Article provided by TraderVox.com
Tradervox.com is a Forex News Portal that provides real-time news and analysis relating to the Currency Markets.
News and analysis are produced throughout the day by our in-house staff.
Follow us on twitter: www.twitter.com/tradervox

Market Review 20.7.12

Source: ForexYard

printprofile

The euro took losses against most of its main currency rivals in overnight trading, as poor demand at a Spanish bond auction yesterday led to risk aversion in the marketplace. The EUR/USD fell close to 30 pips and is currently trading at 1.2255, while the EUR/AUD is currently trading just above a record low at 1.1775. Crude oil maintained its recent gains, as supply side fears due to the ongoing conflict with Iran boosted the commodity. Crude is currently trading at $92.45 a barrel.

Main News for Today

Eurogroup Meetings- All Day
• Euro-zone finance ministers will be meeting to discuss the terms of an aid package to assist the Spanish banking sector
• If the terms of the aid package are agreed to, investor fears regarding the health of Spanish banks may be calmed, which could result in gains for the euro before markets close for the week

Read more forex news on our forex blog

Forex Market Analysis provided by ForexYard.

© 2006 by FxYard Ltd

Disclaimer: Trading Foreign Exchange carries a high level of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. There is a possibility that you could sustain a loss of all of your investment and therefore you should not invest money that you cannot afford to lose. You should be aware of all the risks associated with Foreign Exchange trading.

No Mr. President, Entrepreneurs Did Build That…

By MoneyMorning.com.au

The war against freedom, free enterprise, and entrepreneurialism continues.

Last week US President, Barack Obama told a crowd of cheering Statists and Progressives exactly what he thinks about entrepreneurs.

You can catch a clip of the video here and the full speech here.

He told the baying crowd:

‘If you’ve been successful, you didn’t get there on your own. You didn’t get there on your own…if you got a business, you didn’t build that, somebody else made that happen.’

That’s what every central planner thinks. That if it wasn’t for the government, nothing would get done. Of course, the reality is the complete opposite…

To prove his point, Obama reeled off examples of how businesses didn’t make things happen:

‘The internet didn’t get invented on its own, government research created the internet so that all the companies could make money off the internet…that’s how we created the middle class, that’s how we built the Golden Gate Bridge, the Hoover Dam. That’s how we invented the internet, that’s how we sent a man to the moon.’

Obama and other Statists forget who paid for the big projects — the taxpayer. And that without the ingenuity of entrepreneurs and the hard work of individuals, the government wouldn’t be able to take the taxes that it needs to build its expensive follies.

The Golden Gate Bridge and Hoover Dam are impressive feats of engineering and construction. But would the world really be any worse off if either was never built?

Putting a man on the Moon? Great. What exactly did that achieve? The space race and arms race bankrupted the Soviet Union. And it would have bankrupted the US too if it wasn’t for the entrepreneurialism that kept the US economy going.

The Golden Gate Bridge, Hoover Dam and Neil Armstrong’s small step didn’t create prosperity. They were just the follies built by government from expropriated private wealth (taxes).

(And we won’t even mention the fallacy about the US government inventing the internet. But at least it’s an improvement on Al Gore’s claim to have invented it!)
No. Private enterprise creates the real wealth in an economy.

It’s the entrepreneurs and businesses who take a risk. Some get it right. Others get it wrong.

So Near, Yet So Far

An example of firms getting it wrong is Nokia. We wrote about this to Australian Small-Cap Investigator subscribers a few weeks back, and again in our Money Morning article on how a href=”http://www.moneymorning.com.au/20120704/why-government-intervention-hinders-progress-and-innovation.html” target=”_blank”>government intervention hinders progress and innovation on 4 July.

Here’s what we wrote:

‘First, it missed the trend towards ‘flip’ mobile phones. It stayed with the ‘brick’ style that had won it millions of customers over the years. But at the time consumers wanted compact and sleek phones. The kind you could neatly hide away in a pocket or handbag.

‘But as you know, technology changes quickly. The trend for compact and sleek phones didn’t last long. Perhaps if Nokia caught the next trend wave it would be fine.

‘But no, it missed that too. That was where consumers wanted the opposite of sleek and compact. Mobile phones (smart phones) became fashion accessories.

‘Consumers wanted big screens. The bigger the better. No longer were mobile phones stashed in pockets or handbags, now they were laid out on the table or desk where everyone could marvel at the size of your screen and the smallness of your pixels.

‘Nokia missed out. But Apple and Samsung didn’t.’

It turns out Nokia wasn’t as far away from getting it right as we thought. The Wall Street Journal reports:

‘More than seven years before Apple rolled out the iPhone, the Nokia [design] team showed a phone with a colour touch-screen set above a single button. The device was shown locating a restaurant, playing a racing game and ordering lipstick. In the late 1990s, Nokia secretly developed another alluring product: a tablet computer with a wireless connection and touch screen — all features today of the hot-selling Apple iPad.’

The entrepreneurs (the Nokia designers) had it right, but the pen pushing executives got it wrong, and Nokia has paid the price. Yesterday the firm announced a record loss. As the UK Daily Telegraph reports:

‘In the second quarter, Nokia posted a net loss of 1.41 billion euros, about four times their loss of 368 million euros during the same period a year earlier and more than double the loss anticipated by analysts.’

That’s the problem with big firms that are too slow to move. They’re more worried about protecting their existing market, rather than with trying out crazy new ideas.

Entrepreneurial small businesses are different. Most of the time they’ve got nothing…except for an idea. If they get it wrong and their idea doesn’t work out, they haven’t lost much.

Of course, the investors who punt on the idea may lose, but they know the risks to begin with…which is why they invest. Yes, they lose all they’ve invested, but if the idea works, well, they could make three, four, five, or even 100 times their money.

For punters, those are odds worth taking.

Frontier Investing

It’s that attitude which steers the managing director of the company we met with earlier this week. We recorded a half-hour Strategy Session for subscribers of Australian Small-Cap Investigator. Subscribers will get the link to the video later today.

The company sprung up from nowhere. This entrepreneurial MD recognised an opportunity that few others had explored — the east coast of Africa.

Today, East Africa is a hive of activity. A bidding war between oil major, Shell and a Thai exploration company has priced a UK explorer at more than one billion pounds.

But after missing out on the deal, Shell isn’t finished. It’s eyeing off other assets, including an $8 billion portfolio held by US firm, Anadarko.

This entrepreneur and the small Aussie firm took a risk. It punted on a frontier exploration opportunity.

It could have gone pear-shaped (and it still could; nothing is ever certain with oil exploration until the black gold flows), but it could also lead to big returns for those prepared to take the risk.

So when Statists and Progressives start telling entrepreneurs and individuals that ‘you didn’t build that’, it’s a slap in the face.

President Obama’s attitude to free enterprise is something we’ve always felt Statists and Progressives believed. That your wages are the gift of the government…it takes the taxes and leaves you with whatever is left over.

They may as well say about your wages, ‘you didn’t earn that’.

But if you work in the private sector we know you did earn that. And you earned it despite the government, not because of it.

Cheers,
Kris.

Related Articles

Market Pullback Exposes Five Stocks to Buy

When the Going Gets Tough, Entrepreneurs Innovate

Is This Man the Ultimate Contrarian Indicator for Mining Shares?


No Mr. President, Entrepreneurs Did Build That…

What Are the Bond Markets Telling Us?

By MoneyMorning.com.au

Most small investors spend the majority of their time looking at stock markets. However, I’ve always believed that to get a deeper understanding of what’s really going on, the best thing you can do is to try to figure out what the bond market is telling you.

Why? Because the yields on government bonds have a major impact on the price of virtually all investment assets. Put simply, rising yields tend to reduce the value of assets, while lower ones tends to make them go up. That’s because government bonds are supposed to be the ‘safe’ assets.

That’s very debatable, but assuming the market believes this, then if the yields on government bonds go up, then the yields on other assets such as shares or property should go up too in order to remain attractive. These higher yields are usually achieved because prices fall.

The current action in the bond market is probably the biggest conundrum facing investors today. Despite the massive debts held by governments, yields on the likes of UK gilts and US Treasuries are at record lows.

Is the bond market one massive bubble like dotcom stocks in 1999 or property in 2006, or is it telling us that we face years of Japan-style deflation and stagnation?

The Bond Market ‘Bubble’:
Irrational Exuberance or Plain Realism?

Have a look at the chart below. It shows the redemption yield on ten-year UK government bonds, less the rate of inflation, since 1956 – the real yield. This chart is used by the bond bubble camp to claim that government bonds are massively overvalued and ready for a crash.

UK Real Ten-Year Bond Yields

They argue that no rational investor should accept bond yields less than the rate of inflation. Investing should be about preserving and growing the purchasing power of your money, therefore buying bonds in the current market doesn’t make sense.

I’ve got a lot of sympathy with this view of the bond market. With ten-year UK gilts at 1.55%, there’s little to lose in holding cash.

However, I can also understand why big companies might want to deposit large amounts of cash in the bond market rather than a bank. Deposit insurance limit might cover most small investors’ needs, but it doesn’t help companies with significant cash holdings.

The bubble camp also points out that the UK and US bond markets have been heavily manipulated and propped up by the money-printing and bond-buying of their respective central banks. This has in effect, resulted in a one-way bet for investors.

With heavy central bank buying of bonds pushing up prices and pushing down yields, there’s been some easy money to be made in the bond market. This can’t go on forever, argue the bond bears.

Again, I have a lot of sympathy with this view. But let’s ask ourselves for a moment: what if the bond market is right? What if the UK, US and European economies are actually going the same way as Japan?

If that’s the case, and we’re facing low economic growth and falling prices (deflation), then bond yields could go even lower. Is this the outcome that Western bond markets are correctly anticipating?

Are the UK and the US Bond Markets Turning Japanese?

The arguments made by the bond market bears are very sensible, but I’m not in a hurry to dismiss the bond market. Compared to the equity market, it’s often seen as the smart money. It’s always worth at least considering the possibility that it’s priced correctly.

So could we be heading for a deflationary bust despite the best efforts of the Federal Reserve and the Bank of England?

Let’s have a look at what has happened in the Japanese bond market.

Japanese Ten-Year Bond Yields (%)

As you can see, in 1995, more than five years after the Japanese stock market peaked and the economy started to cool, Japanese government bonds (JGBs) were still yielding 4.5%. Seventeen years later, yields on JGBs are now sitting at 0.77% as repeated attempts to stimulate the economy and increase inflation have failed.

This is because Japan is still stuck in what is known as a ‘balance sheet recession’ – a recession caused by too much debt. The focus of consumers and companies has been to get rid of debt, rather than spend more money. Printing money and cutting interest rates doesn’t do any good in this scenario, because there is no desire to spend, just to save and pay off debt.

Most of the Western world is currently in a similar situation. It too has way too much debt and unfunded welfare liabilities. The credit boom of the mid-2000s means that debt has to be repaid and/or bankruptcies need to rise. Governments and central banks have been doing everything they can to prevent the market from doing its job and a natural correction happening – just as occurred in Japan.

This debt overhang means that despite the large amounts of money printing, the UK and US economies are still stagnating. Money printing is barely keeping the huge deflationary forces at bay.

So could bond yields fall further? Respected economists such as Gary Shilling think so. Shilling has a fantastic record in predicting major economic events and is a prominent deflationist – have a read of his book The Age of Deleveraging. Earlier this year, in a television interview he discussed the possibility of the yields on 30-year US bonds hitting 2% (they are currently 2.58%).

How is this possible? Well, looking back at Japan again, you can see that even with yields of less than 1% you can still have positive real yields (in other words, you can still make a ‘real’ return) if you have deflation. If this is the fate that awaits the UK and US then rather than being hysterical and heavily manipulated, the bond markets are ahead of the game.

Japanese Real Yields (%)

What Happens Next: Deflation Then Inflation?

So there are good grounds to argue that the bond market may be right in predicting that deflation is the major threat in the short-term.

The forces of deflation are so great that the central banks will have to print lots more money than most people expect to create inflation and erode the massive debt burden we face. Only then will the bond market bubble pop and stock and property markets will crash.

The other alternative is for governments to get out of the way and let the markets correct. But for politicians this would be akin to turkeys voting for Christmas.

In Greece, Ireland, Portugal and now Spain, the bond market – free of central bank money printing – has done its job and punished reckless economic behaviour. In the UK and US, the central banks have so far postponed the day of reckoning, but that day will surely come. And when it does, they seem to be voting for an inflationary rather than a deflationary bust.

So What Can You Do With Your Money if the Bond Market Collapses?

It’s not easy to predict when the bond market will collapse as central bankers get their way and spark inflation. The good news is that you don’t have to.

While government bonds could remain at low yields – and could go lower – we still wouldn’t own them. There’s little upside and lots of downside. If you are worried about deflation, then as an individual, holding cash is a safer bet. It also gives optionality to take advantage of falling prices (in other words, if you’re sitting on cash, you can quickly deploy it when you spot bargains).

Hold some gold too as a hedge for when inflation rears its ugly head, as politicians try to print us out of trouble.

Finally, any equity investments should be in companies that have pricing power and so are able to cope with both inflation and deflation.

Phil Oakley

Contributing Writer, Money Morning

Publisher’s Note:This is an edited version of an article that first appeared in MoneyWeek (UK)

From the Archives…

The Credit Market Debt Bubble and the Role of Gold
13-07-2012 – Greg Canavan

How to Survive and Thrive from China’s Bust
12-07-2012 – Kris Sayce

Payday Loans: Why This Lender of Last Resort Isn’t the Bad Guy
11-07-2012 – Kris Sayce

What A Slowing Chinese Economy Means For Pork Chops
10-07-2012 – Dr. Alex Cowie

Late News: Bankers Rig Interest Rates, No-One Fired
09-07-2012 – Dr. Alex Cowie


What Are the Bond Markets Telling Us?

USDCHF is in consolidation of uptrend

USDCHF is in consolidation of the uptrend from 0.9421. Key support is at the upward price channel on 4-hour chart, as long as the channel support holds, we’d expect uptrend to resume, and another rise towards 1.0000 is still possible. On the downside, a clear break below the channel support will indicate that the uptrend from 0.9421 has completed at 0.9872 already, then the following downward movement could bring price back to 0.9500 zone.

usdchf

Forex Signals

How to Buy Silver Below Its Spot Price

Article by Investment U

Most investors are skeptical when you tell them that they can actually buy silver below spot prices.

But it’s absolutely true. And there’s no word play, or gimmicks. Anyone can do it right now.

The only caveat is, to buy silver below spot prices you have to make bulk purchases of the right silver vehicle.

Standard silver bullion – like American Eagles and Canadian Maple Leafs – can often carry high premiums above the metal’s spot price. And no matter how many you buy at once, you’d be very hard pressed to find any bullion dealers willing to part with Eagles or Maple Leafs below spot.

However, there is one specific set of silver coins that dealers quite frequently sell below spot prices.

They’re called “junk silver coins”. And despite their less-than-flattering name, they’ve become one of the most popular investments for speculators looking to get the most silver for their money.

Investing in Junk Silver Coins

The term “junk silver coin” is broad, covering many world coins. But at its core, a junk silver coin is any government-issued coin containing any amount of silver that has little to no numismatic or collectible value above the value of the metal it contains.

Although there are many world coins minted in silver, the most popular junk silver on the market today are circulated U.S. coins minted before 1965. Prior to that year, the U.S. government produced many of its coins in alloys consisting of silver purities ranging from 35% to 90%.

Investors buy these coins today for their metal content, paying attention to what they call “melt value” – which doesn’t imply the melting of the coin (that’s illegal) but rather the intrinsic value of the silver contained.

Here are the most common U.S. junk silver coins that are available on the market today and an idea of their melt values:

Investing in junk silver coins below spot price

In the past few years, the market for U.S. junk silver coins has been quite healthy as buyers quickly learn that they can be one of the absolute most affordable ways to buy silver.

A new, uncirculated American Silver Eagle typically carries a 10% – 15% premium over spot prices right now.

Meanwhile, you buy can U.S. junk silver coins for as little as 1% – 3% over spot prices. Sometimes you can even buy junk silver below spot if you buy in bulk.

But you have to buy the right coins. That’s because a growing interest in numismatics has greatly increased the premiums for certain, rarer U.S. silver coins.

A circulated Peace dollar in good condition, for example, will sell for a 15% – 20% premium from a coin shop or online auction – higher that the premium on a 99.9% pure silver American Eagle.



So if you’re interested in junk silver coins as an affordable way to buy silver, not all U.S. silver coins fit the bill.

But there are three specific U.S. silver coins that I believe provide for the best junk silver investment.

The Best Junk Silver Coins for Investment

The best junk silver coins are the purest. Junk silver coins with lower silver purities – like the 40% silver Kennedy half-dollars and 35% silver Jefferson war nickels – force you to mostly own other metals of much lesser value, like copper and manganese.

Popularity-wise, junk coins with lower silver purities play second fiddle to the 90% silver coins and are ultimately less liquid. So I recommend staying away from those.

So considering purity and rising numismatic values for the rarer U.S. silver coins, here are the three best junk silver coins for investment:

1964 Kennedy Half Dollar 1946-1964 Roosevelt Dime 1932-1964 Washington Quarter

Very few of these coins remain in general circulation. However, you will receive a silver dime or quarter as change once every blue moon.

Nevertheless, you certainly won’t be able to put together a sizable investment from the silver coins you find in your pocket change. So you’ll need to buy them somewhere. And the best places to do that are from coin shops and reputable online dealers. There, you’ll find junk silver coins sold in small denominations, or in what are known as “silver bags”.

The Cheapest Junk Silver: Silver Bags

A silver bag is simply a bag of circulated U.S. junk silver coins – assorted in either single or multiple denominations with varying dates.

A typical 90% silver bag will contain U.S. Roosevelt dimes, Washington quarters, and Franklin and Kennedy half dollars with a specific face value. Dealers most frequently sell silver bags with $100, $500 and $1,000 face values.

These silver bags are the absolute cheapest way to buy silver. Sometimes you can even buy just below spot prices, if you buy enough. One online dealer, Ampex, is selling a $1,000 silver bag for about 0.2% below spot right now. Below is a brief approximation of current premiums on silver bags:

Premiums on silver bags

To buy silver below spot prices, speculators may need to make a sizable investment. But for serious silver investors, a large silver bag could be very profitable if the metal’s price continues to rise.

Even though these coins are called “junk”, they contain one of the most important monetary metals known to man: silver. Today’s coins are minted with base metals of much lesser value, like copper and nickel. It seems to me that they are the real “junk.”

But no matter what you call them, 90% silver U.S. coins can be one of the most affordable and fun ways to invest in silver.

Good Investing,

Luke Burgess

P.S. For a limited time, our friends at Asset Strategies International, Inc. are offering Investment U readers a special deal on “junk” silver coins.

To find out how to get your complimentary Morgan silver dollar, click here.

Article by Investment U

LIBOR Rate Manipulation: What it Means for Investors

Article by Investment U

LIBOR Rate Manipulation: What it Means for Investors

The Barclays LIBOR case has brought to light LIBOR rate manipulation on a massive scale. What does this mean for your investments?

In case you’re not up on your major British multinational banking and financial services conglomerates, Barclays is headquartered in London and was founded in the late seventeenth century.

It has operations in over 50 countries and territories spanning across five continents. We’re talking upwards of 48 million customers. At the end of last year, it had a market capitalization of approximately $34 billion and was the twenty-second largest company listed on the London Stock Exchange.

So yeah, it’s a big deal…

LIBOR Rate Manipulation

Bear with me. The concept of the LIBOR rate is both simple and convoluted at the same time.

It’s almost amazing that it has a place in the world of high finance.

LIBOR stands for the London Interbank Offered Rate. This is the rate banks are charged to borrow money from each other.

Here’s how it works. Thomas Reuters, on behalf of the British Bankers Association (BBA), goes around daily to a bunch of BBA member banks asking how much it would cost to borrow money today from one another. The rate submitted isn’t based on anything concrete, but an estimate of what they believe they would have to pay. Take out the highs and lows, average the remainder, and you have your LIBOR for that day. Wow, that’s based on some heavy math and concrete data.

Now what does all this merry ole England stuff have to do with you?

Well, chances are you’ll never be in the market for an interbank loan in the U.K. – or at least I don’t think so. But, LIBOR isn’t just one rate with one purpose. Different LIBORs are calculated over different time horizons and in many currencies. The rate is used to price somewhere around $800 trillion of investment vehicles worldwide, including adjustable rate mortgages and student loans.

So what would be the reason to manipulate the LIBOR rate?

There’s been a lot of talk over media outlets that Barclays understated their LIBOR during the financial crisis. If they lowered rates, isn’t this good for consumers? It may have been. But that doesn’t look at the entire horizon of the story.

If you listen to the Regulators at the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), the rate manipulation went in both directions. The rate submitted depended upon what type of contract the traders at Barclays were trying to make profitable. This has been documented as going back as far as 2005. That was at the height of market dealing and gambling.

It wasn’t till after the market hit bottom that there was pressure to keep LIBOR down. The lower your borrowing costs, the stronger the bank looked, and vice versa. Remember, the submissions are public record. This information would have easily been factored into pricing its equity.

And then consider that a low interest rate is good for mortgages and car loans because you pay less interest. However, if you’re trying to save in a LIBOR based investment that’s been manipulated lower, you may have been cheated out of return.

And it may have devastated your community. Many cities, pension funds and transportation systems had invested in vehicles based on LIBOR calculations in the mid 2000s. Those entities would have brought in less income if LIBOR was manipulated downwards.

It begs the question, “What cuts in your city or municipality may not have needed to be made?”

That’s why the city of Baltimore is leading a legal battle against banks, such as Barclays, that determine the LIBOR rate. It’s claiming the city’s budget cuts and layoffs were aggravated by the bankers’ LIBOR rate manipulation, which was linked to hundreds of millions of dollars the city had borrowed.

Will Justice Be Served This Time Around? (Probably Not)

Barclays got hit with about $450 million in fines from regulators both in the United States and the United Kingdom.

What may be even more devastating is another black eye for the banking industry. This story just doesn’t have legs across the pond. The initial findings are suggesting that some other global big time players such as Citibank (NYSE: C), J.P. Morgan (NYSE: JPM), HSBC (NYSE: HBC) and Lloyd’s Banking Group (NYSE: LYG) may have had their hands in the LIBOR cookie jar, too.

The bad press and fines may affect some bottom lines and the industry as a whole going forward – granted it hasn’t done much yet. But we may never fully realize the effect this had on unemployment rates and local economies around the United States and the world.

Good Investing,

Jason

Article by Investment U