Article by Investment U
No Social Security. No Medicare. No pensions. Higher life expectancy. Retirement income is harder to attain than ever, but it can be done.
A generation ago, it was easy. Case in point: My Dad spent 35 years working for Bethlehem Steel. He was a union man that knew his pension and retired health benefits were coming after he called it quits. On top of that, he would also file for social security to give him an added boost in retirement income. And that’s how it would be for the rest of his years.
Then that reality changed. For the most part, the private sector realized that pensions – and the actuaries that ran them – put a hurting on their bottom line. Workers would be OK because those 401(k) plans that Congress created finally started to really catch on in the 1990s. Thirteen or 14 years ago a 401(k) would burst off the charts with tech funds and when you wanted to play it safe a money market fund would give you 5%. This saving for retirement stuff wasn’t so hard. Can you say, “The good old days?’’
Let’s fast forward to 2012. We just saw the greatest economic downturn since the Great Depression four years ago. The ball game has changed. Gone are the days when retirement was just simple math. You knew exactly how much retirement income Social Security, savings and your pension would deliver. Then, you would cut back any unaffordable expenses when you hit 65.
With Social Security and Medicare’s future uncertain due to our budget crisis and a market that makes your employer benefit retirement plans remind you of a rollercoaster, the retirement planning process went from pretty simple to very complicated.
The current landscape has caused a great deal of pessimism concerning the retirement years. This new retirement reality is reflected in the fact that only 14% of Americans polled in the 2012 Retirement Confidence Survey conducted by the Employee Benefit Research Institute said they were “very confident they will have enough money to live comfortably in retirement.”
“Will I or we have enough money to maintain a comfortable lifestyle and make adjustments that may be necessary once I stop working?” This question is a burden weighing on the hearts of many. More than half of those surveyed said they had not even tried to calculate how much retirement income they will need.
As you enter that stage where you’re really thinking about how to use retirement money for living expenses, you probably need to come up with a spending plan. Figure out the income you will have and what costs you will be paying out to help make your retirement income last over the long haul. This plan cannot be based on wishful thinking. Let’s be brutally honest. Let’s take into account the following:
There is a risk these days of your nest egg running out while you are still alive and kicking.
Technology and the knowledge of how to live better have us living longer. According to the Society of Actuaries, at age 65:
To sum it up, this money better last cause chances are that you will.
Given your investments, rates of return, life expectancy and amount of risk you’re taking in your 401(k) portfolio, how much money will you need? The run-of-the-mill retirement model will tell you to assume you’ll need to replace 80% of your pre-retirement income. For most people going through this process, many find that there is a gap between projected income and expenses during retirement.
Your plan’s possible “funding gap” will show that some changes in behavior may be necessary to meet objectives. This could be accomplished by increased contributions to retirement plans, a larger allocation to stocks or greater outside savings. It is essential that you determine how you will fill the gap through creating your retirement spending plan.
You need to determine a strategy for using all of your investment accounts and IRAs to bridge the gap. You might want to start by taking the following steps:
For the moment, all of this is preliminary planning because Social Security and Medicare are wild cards.
If your gap really scares you, you also can take these additional steps now:
Allocate your retirement assets to accomplish the complementary strategies of asset preservation and growth. You’ve heard this from Investment U before. Because different asset classes are imperfectly correlated – some zig, while others zag – our approach allows you to boost returns while reducing your portfolio’s volatility. True Asset Allocation should be the foundation stone of your whole investment strategy. It’s critical to your long-term financial health.
To do this, you use a special asset allocation percentage among large and small stocks, foreign shares, real estate investment trusts (REITs), gold stocks and three different types of bonds (high grade corporates, junk bonds and inflation-adjusted treasuries). The actual percentages run as follows:
Remember that just sticking your money in money market accounts and Treasuries doesn’t cut it anymore. According to the Society of Actuaries, from 1980 to 2007, annual inflation in the United States has averaged 3.5%, so keeping some of your money in equities is vital if you expect your retirement funds to last by keeping pace with inflation.
Finally, a good idea would be to keep your retirement funds in separate “buckets.”
Choose the retirement assets that you will draw down first with consideration for tax advantages. Consider withdrawals from taxable accounts first and then tax-deferred accounts such as traditional IRAs, 401(k) plans, 457 plans and the like. Roth IRAs should be drawn down last to allow the tax-free earnings to continue growing as long as possible.
I hope this is a start and gets rid of some of that pessimism.
Good Investing,
Jason Jenkins
Article by Investment U